Hand Out 4
Hand Out 4
Hand Out 4
HAND OUT #4
SPEECH ACT
A speech act is an utterance that a speaker makes to achieve an intended effect. Some of the functions
which are carried out using speech acts are offering an apology, greeting, request, complaint, invitation,
compliment, or refusal. A speech act might contain just one word or several words or sentences. For
example, “Thanks” and “Thank you for always being there for me. I really appreciate it” both show
appreciation regardless of the length of the statement.
According to J. L. Austin (1962), a philosopher of language and the developer of the Speech Act Theory,
there are three types of acts in every utterance, given the right circumstances or context.
These are:
There are also indirect speech acts which occur when there is no direct connection between the form of
the utterance and the intended meaning. They are different in force (i.e., intention) from the inferred
speech act.
PERFORMATIVES
Austin also introduced the concept of performative utterances: statements which enable the speaker to
perform something just by stating it. In this manner, verbs that execute the speech act that they intend
to effect are called performatives. A performative utterance said by the right person under the right
circumstances results in a change in the world. Note that certain conditions have to be met when
making a performative utterance.
For example, the phrase “I now pronounce you husband and wife,” when uttered by an authorized
person such as a judge will have the actual effect of binding a couple in marriage. However, if the same
statement is uttered to the same couple in the same place by someone who is not authorized to marry
them—as in the case of the accompanying picture, a robot—then there is no effect whatsoever because
a condition was not met.
As a response to Austin’s Speech Act Theory, John Searle (1976), a professor from the University of
California, Berkeley, classified illocutionary acts into five distinct categories.
1. Assertive – a type of illocutionary act in which the speaker expresses belief about the truth of a
proposition. Some examples of an assertive act are suggesting, putting forward, swearing, boasting, and
concluding.
3. Commissive – a type of illocutionary act which commits the speaker to doing something in the future.
Examples of a commissive act are promising, planning, vowing, and betting.
4. Expressive – a type of illocutionary act in which the speaker expresses his/her feelings or emotional
reactions. Some examples of an expressive act are thanking, apologizing, welcoming, and deploring.
Example: I am so sorry for not helping out in our group projects and letting you do all the work.
5. Declaration – a type of illocutionary act which brings a change in the external situation. Simply put,
declarations bring into existence or cause the state of affairs which they refer to. Some examples of
declarations are blessing, firing, baptizing, bidding, passing a sentence, and excommunicating.
By saying that someone is fired, an employer causes or brings about the person’s unemployment, thus
changing his external situation. Always keep in mind that speech acts include concrete life interactions
that require the appropriate use of language within a given culture. Communicative competence (i.e.,
the ability to use linguistic knowledge to effectively communicate with others) is essential for a speaker
to be able to use and understand speech acts. Idioms and other nuances in a certain language might be
lost or misunderstood by someone who does not fully grasp the language yet.
1. Nomination
A speaker carries out nomination to collaboratively and productively establish a topic. Basically, when
you employ this strategy, you try to open a topic with the people you are talking to. When beginning a
topic in a conversation, especially if it does not arise from a previous topic, you may start off with news
inquiries and news announcements as they promise extended talk. Most importantly, keep the
conversational environment open for opinions until the prior topic shuts down easily and initiates a
smooth end. This could efficiently signal the beginning of a new topic in the conversation.
2. Restriction
Restriction in communication refers to any limitation you may have as a speaker. When communicating
in the classroom, in a meeting, or while hanging out with your friends, you are typically given specific
instructions that you must follow. These instructions confine you as a speaker and limit what you can
say. For example, in your class, you might be asked by your teacher to brainstorm on peer pressure or
deliver a speech on digital natives. In these cases, you cannot decide to talk about something else. On
the other hand, conversing with your friends during ordinary days can be far more casual than these
examples. Just the same, remember to always be on point and avoid sideswiping from the topic during
the conversation to avoid communication breakdown.
3. Turn-taking
Sometimes people are given unequal opportunities to talk because others take much time during the
conversation. Turn-taking pertains to the process by which people decide who takes the conversational
floor. There is a code of behavior behind establishing and sustaining a productive conversation, but the
primary idea is to give all communicators a chance to speak. Remember to keep your words relevant
and reasonably short enough to express your views or feelings. Try to be polite even if you are trying to
take the floor from another speaker. Do not hog the conversation and talk incessantly without letting
the other party air out their own ideas. To acknowledge others, you may employ visual signals like a
nod, a look, or a step back, and you could accompany these signals with spoken cues such as “What do
you think?” or “You wanted to say something?”
4. Topic Control
Topic control covers how procedural formality or informality affects the development of topic in
conversations. For example, in meetings, you may only have a turn to speak after the chairperson directs
you to do so. Contrast this with a casual conversation with friends over lunch or coffee where you may
take the conversational floor anytime. Remember that regardless of the formality of the context, topic
control is achieved cooperatively. This only means that when a topic is initiated, it should be collectively
developed by avoiding unnecessary interruptions and topic shifts. You can make yourself actively
involved in the conversation without overly dominating it by using minimal responses like “Yes,” “Okay,”
“Go on”; asking tag questions to clarify information briefly like “You are excited, aren’t you?”, “It was
unexpected, wasn’t it?”; and even by laughing!
5. Topic Shifting
Topic shifting, as the name suggests, involves moving from one topic to another. In other words, it is
where one part of a conversation ends and where another begins. When shifting from one topic to
another, you have to be very intuitive. Make sure that the previous topic was nurtured enough to
generate adequate views. You may also use effective conversational transitions to indicate a shift like
“By the way,” “In addition to what you said,” “Which reminds me of,” and the like.
6. Repair
Repair refers to how speakers address the problems in speaking, listening, and comprehending that they
may encounter in a conversation. For example, if everybody in the conversation seems to talk at the
same time, give way and appreciate other’s initiative to set the conversation back to its topic.Repair is
the self-righting mechanism in any social interaction (Schegloff et al, 1977). If there is a problem in
understanding the conversation, speakers will always try to address and correct it. Although this is the
case, always seek to initiate the repair.
7. Termination
Termination refers to the conversation participants’ close-initiating expressions that end a topic in a
conversation. Most of the time, the topic initiator takes responsibility to signal the end of the discussion
as well. Although not all topics may have clear ends, try to signal the end of the topic through
concluding cues. You can do this by sharing what you learned from the conversation. Aside from this,
soliciting agreement from the other participants usually completes the discussion of the topic
`meaningfully.