RELEVANCE THEORY.

. Introduction
Relevance theory may be seen as an attempt to work out in detail one of Grice’s central claims:
that an essential feature of most human communication, both verbal and non-verbal, is the
expression and recognition of intentions (Grice 1989: Essays 1-7, 14, 18; Retrospective
Epilogue). In developing this claim, Grice laid the foundations for an inferential model of
communication, an alternative to the classical code model. According to the code model, a
communicator encodes her intended message into a signal, which is decoded by the
audience using an identical copy of the code. According to the inferential model, a
communicator provides evidence of her intention to convey a certain meaning, which is
inferred by the audience on the basis of the evidence provided. An utterance is, of course, a
linguistically coded piece of evidence, so that verbal comprehension involves an element of
decoding. However, the linguistic meaning recovered by decoding is just one of the inputs to
a non-demonstrative inference process which yields an interpretation of the speaker's
meaning.

The goal of inferential pragmatics is to explain how the hearer infers the speaker’s meaning
on the basis of the evidence provided. The relevance-theoretic account is based on another of
Grice’s central claims: that utterances automatically create expectations which guide the hearer
towards the speaker’s meaning. Grice described these expectations in terms of a Co-operative
Principle and maxims of Quality (truthfulness), Quantity (informativeness), Relation (relevance)
and Manner (clarity) which speakers are expected to observe (Grice 1961; 1989: 368-72): the
interpretation a rational hearer should choose is the one that best satisfies those expectations.

On other hand oxford university defines Relevance theory as a cognitive approach to pragmatics
which starts from two broadly Gricean assumptions: (a) that much human communication, both
verbal and non-verbal, involves the overt expression and inferential recognition of intentions, and
(b) that in inferring these intentions, the addressee presumes that the communicator’s behavior will
meet certain standards, which for Grice are based on a Cooperative Principle and maxims, and for
relevance theory are derived from the assumption that, as a result of constant selection pressures in
the course of human evolution, both cognition and communication are relevance-oriented.
Relevance is defined in terms of cognitive (or contextual) effects and processing effort: other things
being equal, the greater the cognitive effects and the smaller the processing effort, the greater the
relevance.
A long-standing aim of relevance theory has been to show that building an adequate theory of
communication involves going beyond Grice’s notion of speaker’s meaning. Another is to provide a
conceptually unified account of how a much broader variety of communicative acts than Grice was
concerned with—including cases of both showing that and telling that—are understood. The
resulting pragmatic theory differs from Grice’s in several respects. It sees explicit communication as
much richer and more inferential than Grice thought, with encoded sentence meanings providing no
more than clues to the speaker’s intentions. It rejects the close link that Grice saw between implicit
communication and (real or apparent) maxim violation, showing in particular how figurative
utterances might arise naturally and spontaneously in the course of communication. It offers an
account of vagueness or indeterminacy in communication, which is often abstracted away from in
more formally oriented frameworks. It investigates the role of context in comprehension, and shows
how tentative hypotheses about the intended combination of explicit content, contextual
assumptions, and implicatures might be refined and mutually adjusted in the course of the
comprehension process in order to satisfy expectations of relevance.
Relevance theory treats the borderline between semantics and pragmatics as co-extensive with the
borderline between (linguistic) decoding and (pragmatic) inference. It sees encoded sentence
meanings as typically fragmentary and incomplete, and as having to undergo inferential enrichment
or elaboration in order to yield fully propositional forms. It reanalyzes Grice’s conventional
implicatures—which he saw as semantic but non-truth-conditional aspects of the meaning of words
like but and so—as encoding procedural information with dedicated pragmatic or more broadly
cognitive functions, and extends the notion of procedural meaning to a range of further items such
as pronouns, discourse particles, mood indicators, and affective intonation.

THE FOUNDER.
It was first proposed by Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson, and is used within cognitive linguistics
and pragmatics.

Initially, Sperber & Wilson proposed one Principle of Relevance to account for the fact that
an act of ostension carries a guarantee of its eventual relevance, but in the Postface to the
second edition of their book Relevance (Sperber & Wilson, 1995: 260ff), they propose that
we can distinguish a broad a cognitive principle of relevance: “human cognition tends to be
geared to the maximization of relevance”), as well as a narrower communicative principle of
relevance: “every act of ostensive communication communicates a presumption of its own
optimal relevance”; 1986: 158), the latter being the main focus of analysis within pragmatics.
But the former is important too, since it stresses the fact that we are biologically geared
4
towards processing the most relevant inputs available. Besides, it is this evolved disposition
that allows for the prediction of the mental states of others, which is crucial in human
communication.
The communicative principle involves a definition of optimal relevance comprising
two parts: (a) The ostensive stimulus is relevant enough for it to be worth the addressee’s
effort to process it; and (b) The ostensive stimulus is the most relevant one compatible with
the communicator’s abilities and preferences (Sperber & Wilson, 1995: 267 and 270). As
Wilson & Sperber (2002a: 257-258) correctly point out, communicators “cannot be expected
to go against their own interests and preferences in producing an utterance. There may be
relevant information that they are unable or unwilling to provide, and ostensive stimuli that
would convey their intentions more economically, but that they are unwilling to produce, or
unable to think of at the time”. All this is covered by clause (b) of the definition of optimal
relevance, which states that the ostensive stimulus is the most relevant one “that the
communicator is WILLING AND ABLE to produce” (ibid., 258).
2.4. Assessing relevance: Cognitive effects versus processing effort
Unlike what is the case in ‘static’ pragmatics, which foregrounds the importance of context
but somehow takes it for given or is merely interested in dissecting, as it were, its elements,
Sperber & Wilson’s theory views the context as a dynamic, mental entity made up of a sub-set
of the person’s assumptions about the world; it is this subset which is accessed in the search
for relevance. Often several extensions of context are required in order to arrive at an
optimally relevant interpretation. However, as soon as one interpretation is found to be
satisfactory, interpretation stops and no other interpretive hypotheses are considered: “when a
hearer following the path of least effort finds an interpretation which satisfies his expectations
of relevance, in the absence of contrary evidence, this is the best possible interpretive
hypothesis” (Wilson & Sperber, 2002b: 605).
The aforementioned Communicative Principle of Relevance predicts a basic procedure
for hearers when hypothesizing about contextual extensions required for the interpretation of
a verbal stimulus: to consider interpretive hypotheses in order of accessibility (following a
path of least effort) and to stop when they arrive at an interpretation which satisfies the
expectations of relevance raised by the stimulus itself. Relevance, then, is a matter of balance
between the interest that the utterance might provide (in terms of so-called “positive cognitive
effects”) and the mental effort that obtaining this interest demands.
Relevance is a characteristic of an input to the human cognitive processes which, when
processed in a certain context, yields positive cognitive effects. Since there are too many
possible stimuli to which we can pay attention, our cognitive architecture is designed to
allocate our processing effort in such a way that benefit is maximized. Hence, relevance has to
do with the improvement of the person’s knowledge; this can be achieved either by adding
new information, by revising existing assumptions, or by yielding new conclusions resulting
from the combination of old and new information (in this case contextual implications are
generated).
The definition of relevance of an input to an individual involves two clauses: “(a)
everything else being equal, the greater the positive cognitive effects achieved in an
individual by processing an input at a given time, the greater the relevance of the input to that
individual at that time; and (b) everything else being equal, the smaller the processing effort
expended by the individual in achieving those effects, the greater the relevance of the input to
that individual at that time” (Wilson & Sperber, 2002b: 602).
3. CURRENT ISSUES AND OPEN DEBATES
3.1. The explicit/implicit distinction
One of the key differences between Grice’s model and Sperber & Wilson’s lies in the
demarcation of explicit and implicit communication. For Grice, what is said involved little
inference, mainly reduced to disambiguation and reference assignment, while all the
inferential load was laid upon the derivation of implicatures, the latter being obtained after an
interpretation reduced to the literal meaning has been found inappropriate, in a so-called dual-
stage processing. Sperber & Wilson reject this view and favor a more adequate, mutual
parallel adjustment of explicit content –explicatures– and implicit import –implicatures–
during interpretation, and with no pre-conceived sequential arrangement.
Within RT, explicitly communicated information not only demands as much
contextualization as do implicatures, but also covers aspects of communicated meaning which
Grice included in the term implicature (e.g. the so-called generalized conversational
6
implicatures, most of which are now pictured as explicit information, see Levinson, 2000;
Carston, 2002).
Besides implicatures, Sperber & Wilson propose two types of explicitly
communicated information: the basic-level explicature, and the higher-level explicature.
The latter also includes the speaker’s attitude (to regret that…, to be happy that…, etc.) or a
higher-order speech-act schema (to be asking that…, to be ordering that…, etc.). Both
explicatures and implicatures allow for degrees (i.e., strong and weak
explicatures/implicatures), depending on the addressee’s responsibility for their derivation
and the amount of mental processing required.
Other notions used by other authors in the definition of explicit information, for
instance literal meaning or what is said, are put into question by Sperber & Wilson, since
these do not play any useful role in the study of verbal comprehension: “even when a literal
meaning is available, it is not automatically the preferred interpretation of an utterance. In
fact, literalness plays no role in our account of language comprehension, and nor does the
notion of what is said” (Wilson & Sperber, 2002b: 586). This is because, among other
reasons, hearers commonnly derive loose interpretations rather than purely literal ones:
“hearers have no objection to strictly false approximations as long as the conclusions they
bother to derive from them are true. In fact, they might prefer the shorter approximations to
their longer-winded but strictly true counterparts for reasons of economy of effort” (ibid.,
598).
Whereas Bach (1994) has proposed a third term, impliciture, half-way between
explicatures and implicatures, other authors, such as Vicente (2002), reject this blurring of the
explicit/implicit dichotomy. The term ‘impliciture’ covers several cases which would fit into
Sperber & Wilson’s notion of explicature, basically being completions of the semantic
representation of the sentence (e.g. ‘The table is too wide’ [to go through the door]) and non-
literal uses of sentences in which no constituent is being used non-literally, what Bach calls
standardized non-literality (e.g. (said to a person who has cut himself) ‘You are not going to
die’ [from this cut]).
3.2. Conceptual and procedural encoding
7
... According to relevance theory, a cognitive pragmatics theory of human communication (Sperber
and Wilson, 1995), in the process of interacting with various sources of information, individuals
maximize their ability to identify the relevance of the stimuli that they process. explains that in
relevance processing one of the most essential mechanisms is the "human ability to combine
contextual… information with new incoming information to yield relevant conclusions, as in … 1)
new information…, 2) information already available (from encyclopedic knowledge)," and relevant
conclusion inferred by combining the two mentioned criteria (p. 681). ...
Guardians of the Knowledge: Relevant, Irrelevant, or Algorithmic?
Preprint
Full-text available

• Jul 2019
•
• Lala Hajibayova
View
... . As was summarised in, according to relevance theory(Sperber and Wilson 1995), the human
cognitive system infers two basic types of information encoded by linguistic expressions: concepts
or conceptual representations on the one hand, and procedures for manipulating them on the other.
Connectives such as but should not be seen as encoding concepts, but as procedural devices which
constrain the inferential phase by indicating the kind of cognitive process that the hearer should go
through. ...
An outline of some future research issues for internet pragmatics [Internet Pragmatics 2(1): 1-33,
2019]
Article
Full-text available
• May 2019
•
 • Francisco Yus
View
... Although displays the point of view of the mutual knowledge and the mutual manifestness the
theory presents-rejecting the former and approving the latter-and the critics' opinions, considering
both of them cannot be distinguished from each other, he considers that the two parties are not
convinced to give up their "claims about mutuality." Criticized as a cognitive theory, it is considered
as a hypothetical theory since it does not use empirical proof while predicting the mental processes
and interpretive phases the mind of humans experiences during the communication process. ...
Communicators' Schemata and Mutual Role Achieving Relevance in Catherine Ryan Hyde's Pay It
Forward - An Interdisciplinary Cognitive Approach
Thesis
Full-text available
• Feb 2019
•
• Abdelghani Elhusseini
View
... Discussing the optimal relevance, Francisco stresses the communicator's role concerning the
ostensive stimulus which will be most relevant only when the first person is willing and able to
use/create the relevant information. Thus, he refers to the Gricean's Maxim of Quality, which is
connected to the TRUTH telling. ...
COMMUNICATORS' SCHEMATA AND MUTUAL ROLE ACHIEVING RELEVANCE
Conference Paper
Full-text available
• Feb 2019
•
• Abdelghani Elhusseini
View
... This chapter addresses humor on the Internet from a cognitive pragmatics, relevance-theoretic
perspective (see Sperber & Wilson, 1995;Wilson & Sperber, 2004Yus, , 2010b. This theoretical
framework aims to describe the mental processes and inferential strategies that humans engage in
while making sense of what people communicate. ...
Positive non-humorous effects of humor on the Internet
Chapter
Full-text available
• Jan 2018
•
• Francisco Yus
View
... Gibbs bases his definition on informative intentions described in Relevance theorywhich is
categorized as a post-Gricean approach in pragmatics . "The communicator's informative intention
is better described as an intention to modify directly not the thoughts but the cognitive environment
of the audience" (Sperber & Wilson, 1995: 58). ...
Intentionality and Conventionality in the Use of Irony
Thesis
Full-text available
• Jun 2016
•
• Reza Arab
View
Ostension and the communicative function of natural language
Article
• Apr 2022
• J PRAGMATICS
•
• Stavros Assimakopoulos
View
Beyond meaningNN and ostension: Pragmatic inference in the wild
Chapter
• Nov 2021
•
• Stavros Assimakopoulos
View
Chapter 12. Positive non-humorous effects of humor on the internet
Chapter
• Jan 2018
•
• Francisco Yus
View
The Cognitive Principle Of Relevance And Its Application To Anti-Iraq War Posters
Article
Full-text available
• Jan 2017
•
• Fareed Hameed Al-hindawi
• Rufaidah Kamal Abdulmajeed
View
 Object 1

Recommended publications
Discover more
Article

Propositional Attitudes
December 2006
•
• Kasia Jaszczolt
K M Jaszczolt is senior lecturer in semantics and pragmatics at the University of Cambridge and
fellow of Newnham College, Cambridge. She also taught linguistics at the universities of Oxford,
Sussex, and Brighton. She is the managing editor of the book series Current Research in the
Semantics/Pragmatics Interface (CRiSPI) and a member of the editorial board of Journal of
Pragmatics and the book ... [Show full abstract]
Read more
Article
Full-text available

Examining the Differences in Assessing Quality of Translations and

Acceptability of Texts
July 2013 · ELOPE English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries
•
• Lara Burazer
The main focus of modern Translation Studies seems to be the ever changing challenges of
successful cross–cultural communication. With globalisation of society, limitations in mutual
understanding are surfacing, which are usually followed by the communicator’s failure to meet the
other party’s expectations. Such expectations are not only linguistically, but culturally embedded
and might prove ... [Show full abstract]
View full-text
Article

The Order of Noun and Demonstrative in Bantu.

January 2005
• Mark Van De Velde
In general Bantu languages have a head-before-dependent (HD) basic word order, leaving aside
some exceptional languages such as Nen (A44). Nominal objects and adverbs follow the verb, there
are prepositions and almost all adnominal modifiers follow their head noun. The only exception on
clause level is the initial position of the subject, which is common in HD languages and which I will
not ... [Show full abstract]
Read more
Article

Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development

December 2001 · Applied Linguistics
• G. Kasper
L2 learners' development of pragmatic ability has been studied from a variety of theoretical
perspectives. This paper seeks to assess the contributions made by different approaches to
interlanguage pragmatics as a subfield of Second Language Acquisition. A first approach locates the
development of pragmatic ability within a comprehensive model of communicative competence,
either examining ... [Show full abstract]
Read more

or
Discover by subject area
• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login

Company
About us
News
Careers
Support
Help Center
Business solutions
Advertising
Recruiting
© 2008-2024 ResearchGate GmbH. All rights reserved.
• Terms
• Privacy
• Copyright
• Imprint
• Consent preferences