Rayat Shikshan Sanstha’s

Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Polytechnic, Satara

Micro-Project Report
On
“ MOVING BALLS USING JAVA APPLET “

Presented By :
Roll No Name of Student

136 SANIKA ASHOK JADHAV

140 SIDDHI MAHADEV KUMBHAR

142 MAHEK NASIR SHAIKH

144 SHIVANJALI TANAJI SHINDE

Program: Diploma in Computer Engineering

Class: SYCO (4th Semester)
Course: Java Programming (Subject Code: 22412)

Guided By: Prof.Miss.Jadhav B.S

Computer Engineering Department [2023-24]

 Rayat Shikshan Sanstha’s

Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Polytechnic, Satara

CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that

Ms.SANIKA ASHOK JADHAV

Ms.SIDDHI MAHADEV KUMBHAR

Ms. MAHEK NASIR SHAIKH

Ms.SHIVANJALI TANAJI SHINDE

of Second Year ( Semester 4 ) have successfully completed the Micro-Project

work titled “MOVINGS BALL USING JAVA APPLET” in the Course
Java Programming (22412) of Program Diploma in Computer Engineering of
Maharashtra State of Technical Education, Mumbai, Maharashtra State.

Prof. Ms. Jadhav B.S Prof. Ghorpade Prin. Dr.Shaikh K.C

Guide Head of Department Principal

Date:
Place:
 Undertaking by Students

We will preserve micro-project and the report in our custody till end of completion of
our program. We assure that we will produce the same whenever we or anybody from our
group will be asked to produce it without fail.

Sr. Roll Name of Student Mobile No. Signature

No. No.
1 136 SANIKA ASHOK JADHAV 9021736053

2 140 SIDDHI MAHADEV 8237982755

KUMBHAR

3 142 MAHEK NASIR SHAIKH 8669038370

4 144 SHIVANJALI TANAJI 9373482167

SHINDE
 Annexure – I A

Part A – Plan

Title of Micro-Project: “MOVING BALLS USING JAVA APPLET”

1.0 Brief Introduction: (Importance of the project, in about 4 to 5 sentences)

Java applets are small pieces of code that work in another program. They help make a page more dynamic.
In addition to adding bling to a site, Java applets also add another layer of computer security. The biggest
advantage of applets is that they can be used on multiple platforms.

2.0 Aim is the of the Micro-Project (in about 4 to 5 sentences) This

Micro-Project aims at a
a) To understand the Java Applet
b) To understand the working of Java Applet

3.0 Action Plan (Sequence and time required for major activities for 8 weeks)
Sr. Planned Planned Name of Responsible
No. Details of Activity Start date Finish date Team Members

1 FORMATION OF GROUP 10/10/23 11/10/23 ALL TEAM MEMBERS

2 DISTRIBUTIONN OF WORK 12/10/23 15/10/23 SHIVANJALI SHINDE

3 COLLECTING 16/10/23 17/10/23 SANIKA JADHAV

INFORMATION
4 CREATING PDF 18/10/23 19/10/23 MAHEK SHAIKH

5 PRINT OUT 22/10/22 23/10/23 SIDDHI KUMBHAR

4.0 Resources Requires (Major resources such as raw materials, some machining facility, software etc.)
Sr.
No. Name of resource / material Specification Quantity Remarks

1 Google Information 2

2 PC Processing 3

3 MS OFFICE Editing 1
 Annexure – I

A Part B – Outcome after Execution

“MOVING BALLS USING JAVA APPLET”

1.0 Brief Description:

In Moving Balls using Java Applet project we have two balls moving perpendicular to each
other . Also balls have some sort of animation which will change it’s color a regular intervals .

2.0 Aim of the Micro-Project

A) To understand the Java Applet

B) To understand the working of Java Applet
INFORMATION:

• Applets are small Java applications that can be accessed on an Internet server,

transported over Internet, and can be automatically installed and run as apart of a

web document.

• After a user receives an applet, the applet can produce a graphical user interface. It

has limited access to resources so that it can run complex computations without

introducing the risk of viruses or breaching data integrity.

• Any applet in Java is a class that extends the java.applet.Applet class.

• An Applet class does not have any main() method. It is viewed using JVM. The JVM

can use either a plug-in of the Web browser or a separate runtime environment to

run an applet application.

• JVM creates an instance of the applet class and invokes init() method to initialize an applet
Actual Resources Used
(Mention the actual resources used )
Sr.
No. Name of resource / material Specification Quantity Remarks

1 GOOGLE FOR INFORMATION -

2 JDK 1.8.1 FOR CODING 1

3 MS OFFICE FOR TYPING AND 1

WORKING ON PROJECT

3.0 Code:
4.0 Output of the Micro-Project:
 Annexure – III

Teacher Evaluation Sheet

Name of Student: SANIKA ASHOK JADHAV Enrollment No.: 23210940252

Name of Program: Diploma in Computer Engineering Semester: 4

Course Title: Java programming Code: 22412

Title of the Micro-Project: “ MOVING BALLS USING JAVA APPLET”

Course Outcomes Achieved:

Evaluation as per suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

(Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)
Sr. Characteristic to be Poor ( Average ( Good Excellent (
No. assessed Marks 1 -3 ) Marks 4 -5 ) ( Marks 6 -8 ) Marks 9 -10)

1 Relevance to the course

2 Literature survey /
Information collected

3 Project Proposal

4 Completion of target as
per project proposal

5 Analysis of data and

representation

6 Quality of prototype /
Model

7 Report Preparation

8 Presentation

9 Defense
 Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet
Process assessment Product assessment

Part A Part B Individual Total Marks

Project Project Project Report / Presentation /
Proposal Methodology Working Model Viva 10
( 2 marks ) ( 2 marks ) ( 2 marks ) ( 4 marks)

Note: Every course teacher is expected to assign marks for group evolution in first 3 columns and individual
evolution in 4th column for each group of students as per suggested rubrics.

Comments / suggestion about team work / leadership / inter-personal communication (if any):

Any other Comment:

Name and designation of faculty member:

Signature:

Guidelines for report:

1) Paper Size: A4
2) Font name: Times New Roman
3) Font size: 12 points (excluding cover page and initial pages)
4) Margins (Top, Bottom, Left, Right) : 2.5 cm
5) Line spacing: 1.2
6) Black and White printing (No colour print)
 Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

Sr. Characteristic to be Poor Average Good Excellent

No. assessed ( Marks 1 -3 ) ( Marks 4 -5 ) ( Marks 6 -8 ) ( Marks 9 -10)

1 Relevance to the course Relate to very Relate to very Take care of Take care of
few LOs few LOs atleast one CO more than one
CO

2 Literature survey / Not more than At-least 5 At-least 7 At-least 10

Information collected two sources relevant sources, relevant sources, relevant
(primary and at least 2 latest. most latest. sources, most
secondary), very latest.
old reference

3 Project Proposal Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent

4 Completion of target as Completed less Completed n Completed n Completed
per project proposal than 50% 50 to 60% 60 to 80% more than 80%

5 Analysis of data and Sample size Sufficient and Sufficient and Enough data
representation small, data appropriate appropriate collected by
neither sample, enough sample, enough sufficient and
organised nor data generated data generated appropriate
presented but not which is sample size.
well. organised and organised but Proper
not well poor inferences inferences
present. drawn. drawn by
organising and
presenting data
through tables,
charts and
graphs.
6 Quality of prototype / Incomplete Just assembled / Well assembled Well
Model fabrication / fabricated and / fabricated assembled /
assembly. parts are not with proper fabricated with
functioning functioning proper
well. Not in parts. In proper functioning
proper shape, shape, within parts. In proper
dimensions tolerance shape, within
dimensions and tolerance
beyond
good finish / dimensions and
tolerance limit.
appearance. good finish /
Appearance /
But no appearance.
finish is creativity in Creativity in
shabby. design and use design and use
of material. of material.

7 Report Preparation Very short, poor Nearly Detailed Very detailed

quality sufficient and correct and correct, clear
correct details clear description of
about methods, description of methods,
materials, methods, materials,
precautions and materials, precautions.
conclusion, but precautions. and and conclusion,
clarity is not conclusion, Enough tables,
there in Sufficient charts and
presentation. graphic sketches.
But not enough description.
graphic
description.

8 Presentation Major Includes major Includes major Well organized

information is information information and includes major
not included, but not well well organized information,
information is organized and but not well
not well presented well. presented well. presented.
organized.

9 Defense Could not reply Replied to Replied Replied most

to considerable considerable properly to of the questions
number of number of considerable properly.
question. questions but number of
not very questions.
properly.
 Teacher Evaluation Sheet
Name of Student: SIDDHI MAHADEV KUMBHAR Enrollment No.: 23210940256

Name of Program: Diploma in Computer Engineering Semester: 4

Course Title: Java programming Code: 22412

Title of the Micro-Project: “ MOVING BALLS USING JAVA APPLET”

Course Outcomes Achieved:

Evaluation as per suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

(Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)
Sr. Characteristic to be Poor ( Average ( Good Excellent (
No. assessed Marks 1 -3 ) Marks 4 -5 ) ( Marks 6 -8 ) Marks 9 -10)

1 Relevance to the course

2 Literature survey /
Information collected

3 Project Proposal

4 Completion of target as
per project proposal

5 Analysis of data and

representation

6 Quality of prototype /
Model

7 Report Preparation

8 Presentation

9 Defense
 Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet
Process assessment Product assessment

Part A Part B Individual Total Marks

Project Project Project Report / Presentation /
Proposal Methodology Working Model Viva 10
( 2 marks ) ( 2 marks ) ( 2 marks ) ( 4 marks)

Note: Every course teacher is expected to assign marks for group evolution in first 3 columns and individual
evolution in 4th column for each group of students as per suggested rubrics.

Comments / suggestion about team work / leadership / inter-personal communication (if any):

Any other Comment:

Name and designation of faculty member:

Signature:

Guidelines for report:

1)Paper Size: A4
2)Font name: Times New Roman
3)Font size: 12 points (excluding cover page and initial pages)
4)Margins (Top, Bottom, Left, Right) : 2.5 cm
5)Line spacing: 1.2
6)Black and White printing (No colour printing)
 Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

Sr. Characteristic to be Poor Average Good Excellent

No. assessed ( Marks 1 -3 ) ( Marks 4 -5 ) ( Marks 6 -8 ) ( Marks 9 -10)

1 Relevance to the course Relate to very Relate to very Take care of Take care of
few LOs few LOs atleast one CO more than one
CO

2 Literature survey / Not more than At-least 5 At-least 7 At-least 10

Information collected two sources relevant sources, relevant sources, relevant
(primary and at least 2 latest. most latest. sources, most
secondary), very latest.
old reference

3 Project Proposal Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent

4 Completion of target as Completed less Completed n Completed n Completed
per project proposal than 50% 50 to 60% 60 to 80% more than 80%

5 Analysis of data and Sample size Sufficient and Sufficient and Enough data
representation small, data appropriate appropriate collected by
neither sample, enough sample, enough sufficient and
organised nor data generated data generated appropriate
presented but not which is sample size.
well. organised and organised but Proper
not well poor inferences inferences
present. drawn. drawn by
organising and
presenting data
through tables,
charts and
graphs.
6 Quality of prototype / Incomplete Just assembled / Well assembled Well
Model fabrication / fabricated and / fabricated assembled /
assembly. parts are not with proper fabricated with
functioning functioning proper
well. Not in parts. In proper functioning
proper shape, shape, within parts. In proper
dimensions tolerance shape, within
dimensions and tolerance
beyond
good finish / dimensions and
tolerance limit.
appearance. good finish /
Appearance /
But no appearance.
finish is creativity in Creativity in
shabby. design and use design and use
of material. of material.

7 Report Preparation Very short, poor Nearly Detailed Very detailed

quality sufficient and correct and correct, clear
correct details clear description of
about methods, description of methods,
materials, methods, materials,
precautions and materials, precautions.
conclusion, but precautions. and and conclusion,
clarity is not conclusion, Enough tables,
there in Sufficient charts and
presentation. graphic sketches.
But not enough description.
graphic
description.

8 Presentation Major Includes major Includes major Well organized

information is information information and includes major
not included, but not well well organized information,
information is organized and but not well
not well presented well. presented well. presented.
organized.

9 Defense Could not reply Replied to Replied Replied most

to considerable considerable properly to of the questions
number of number of considerable properly.
question. questions but number of
not very questions.
properly.
 Teacher Evaluation Sheet
Name of Student: MAHEK NASIR SHAIKH Enrollment No.: 23210940258

Name of Program: Diploma in Computer Engineering Semester: 4

Course Title: Java programming Code: 22412

Title of the Micro-Project: “ MOVING BALLS USING JAVA APPLET”

Course Outcomes Achieved:

Evaluation as per suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

(Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)
Sr. Characteristic to be Poor ( Average ( Good Excellent (
No. assessed Marks 1 -3 ) Marks 4 -5 ) ( Marks 6 -8 ) Marks 9 -10)

1 Relevance to the course

2 Literature survey /
Information collected

3 Project Proposal

4 Completion of target as
per project proposal

5 Analysis of data and

representation

6 Quality of prototype /
Model

7 Report Preparation

8 Presentation

9 Defense
 Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet
Process assessment Product assessment

Part A Part B Individual Total Marks

Project Project Project Report / Presentation /
Proposal Methodology Working Model Viva 10
( 2 marks ) ( 2 marks ) ( 2 marks ) ( 4 marks)

Note: Every course teacher is expected to assign marks for group evolution in first 3 columns and individual
evolution in 4th column for each group of students as per suggested rubrics.

Comments / suggestion about team work / leadership / inter-personal communication (if any):

Any other Comment:

Name and designation of faculty member:

Signature:

Guidelines for report:

1)Paper Size: A4
2)Font name: Times New Roman
3)Font size: 12 points (excluding cover page and initial pages)
4)Margins (Top, Bottom, Left, Right) : 2.5 cm
5)Line spacing: 1.2
6)Black and White printing (No colour printing)
 Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

Sr. Characteristic to be Poor Average Good Excellent

No. assessed ( Marks 1 -3 ) ( Marks 4 -5 ) ( Marks 6 -8 ) ( Marks 9 -10)

1 Relevance to the course Relate to very Relate to very Take care of Take care of
few LOs few LOs atleast one CO more than one
CO

2 Literature survey / Not more than At-least 5 At-least 7 At-least 10

Information collected two sources relevant sources, relevant sources, relevant
(primary and at least 2 latest. most latest. sources, most
secondary), very latest.
old reference

3 Project Proposal Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent

4 Completion of target as Completed less Completed n Completed n Completed
per project proposal than 50% 50 to 60% 60 to 80% more than 80%

5 Analysis of data and Sample size Sufficient and Sufficient and Enough data
representation small, data appropriate appropriate collected by
neither sample, enough sample, enough sufficient and
organised nor data generated data generated appropriate
presented but not which is sample size.
well. organised and organised but Proper
not well poor inferences inferences
present. drawn. drawn by
organising and
presenting data
through tables,
charts and
graphs.
6 Quality of prototype / Incomplete Just assembled / Well assembled Well
Model fabrication / fabricated and / fabricated assembled /
assembly. parts are not with proper fabricated with
functioning functioning proper
well. Not in parts. In proper functioning
proper shape, shape, within parts. In proper
dimensions tolerance shape, within
dimensions and tolerance
beyond
good finish / dimensions and
tolerance limit.
appearance. good finish /
Appearance /
But no appearance.
finish is creativity in Creativity in
shabby. design and use design and use
of material. of material.

7 Report Preparation Very short, poor Nearly Detailed Very detailed

quality sufficient and correct and correct, clear
correct details clear description of
about methods, description of methods,
materials, methods, materials,
precautions and materials, precautions.
conclusion, but precautions. and and conclusion,
clarity is not conclusion, Enough tables,
there in Sufficient charts and
presentation. graphic sketches.
But not enough description.
graphic
description.

8 Presentation Major Includes major Includes major Well organized

information is information information and includes major
not included, but not well well organized information,
information is organized and but not well
not well presented well. presented well. presented.
organized.

9 Defense Could not reply Replied to Replied Replied most

to considerable considerable properly to of the questions
number of number of considerable properly.
question. questions but number of
not very questions.
properly.
 Teacher Evaluation Sheet
Name of Student: SHIVANJALI TANAJI SHINDE Enrollment No.: 23210940260

Name of Program: Diploma in Computer Engineering Semester: 4

Course Title: Java programming Code: 22412

Title of the Micro-Project: “ MOVING BALLS USING JAVA APPLET”

Course Outcomes Achieved:

Evaluation as per suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

(Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)
Sr. Characteristic to be Poor ( Average ( Good Excellent (
No. assessed Marks 1 -3 ) Marks 4 -5 ) ( Marks 6 -8 ) Marks 9 -10)

1 Relevance to the course

2 Literature survey /
Information collected

3 Project Proposal

4 Completion of target as
per project proposal

5 Analysis of data and

representation

6 Quality of prototype /
Model

7 Report Preparation

8 Presentation

9 Defense
 Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet
Process assessment Product assessment

Part A Part B Individual Total Marks

Project Project Project Report / Presentation /
Proposal Methodology Working Model Viva 10
( 2 marks ) ( 2 marks ) ( 2 marks ) ( 4 marks)

Note: Every course teacher is expected to assign marks for group evolution in first 3 columns and individual
evolution in 4th column for each group of students as per suggested rubrics.

Comments / suggestion about team work / leadership / inter-personal communication (if any):

Any other Comment:

Name and designation of faculty member:

Signature:

Guidelines for report:

1)Paper Size: A4
2)Font name: Times New Roman
3)Font size: 12 points (excluding cover page and initial pages)
4)Margins (Top, Bottom, Left, Right) : 2.5 cm
5)Line spacing: 1.2
6)Black and White printing (No colour printing)
 Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

Sr. Characteristic to be Poor Average Good Excellent

No. assessed ( Marks 1 -3 ) ( Marks 4 -5 ) ( Marks 6 -8 ) ( Marks 9 -10)

1 Relevance to the course Relate to very Relate to very Take care of Take care of
few LOs few LOs atleast one CO more than one
CO

2 Literature survey / Not more than At-least 5 At-least 7 At-least 10

Information collected two sources relevant sources, relevant sources, relevant
(primary and at least 2 latest. most latest. sources, most
secondary), very latest.
old reference

3 Project Proposal Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent

4 Completion of target as Completed less Completed n Completed n Completed
per project proposal than 50% 50 to 60% 60 to 80% more than 80%

5 Analysis of data and Sample size Sufficient and Sufficient and Enough data
representation small, data appropriate appropriate collected by
neither sample, enough sample, enough sufficient and
organised nor data generated data generated appropriate
presented but not which is sample size.
well. organised and organised but Proper
not well poor inferences inferences
present. drawn. drawn by
organising and
presenting data
through tables,
charts and
graphs.
6 Quality of prototype / Incomplete Just assembled / Well assembled Well
Model fabrication / fabricated and / fabricated assembled /
assembly. parts are not with proper fabricated with
functioning functioning proper
well. Not in parts. In proper functioning
proper shape, shape, within parts. In proper
dimensions tolerance shape, within
dimensions and tolerance
beyond
good finish / dimensions and
tolerance limit.
appearance. good finish /
Appearance /
But no appearance.
finish is creativity in Creativity in
shabby. design and use design and use
of material. of material.

7 Report Preparation Very short, poor Nearly Detailed Very detailed

quality sufficient and correct and correct, clear
correct details clear description of
about methods, description of methods,
materials, methods, materials,
precautions and materials, precautions.
conclusion, but precautions. and and conclusion,
clarity is not conclusion, Enough tables,
there in Sufficient charts and
presentation. graphic sketches.
But not enough description.
graphic
description.

8 Presentation Major Includes major Includes major Well organized

information is information information and includes major
not included, but not well well organized information,
information is organized and but not well
not well presented well. presented well. presented.
organized.

9 Defense Could not reply Replied to Replied Replied most

to considerable considerable properly to of the questions
number of number of considerable properly.
question. questions but number of
not very questions.
properly.