Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Case 3.6

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 49

Tensile Butt Joint

 Simple butt joint loaded in tension or compression


 Stress is normal stress

 Throat h does not include extra reinforcement


 Reinforcement adds some strength for static loaded joints
 Reinforcement adds stress concentration and should be ground
off for fatigue loaded joints

Fig. 9–7a Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Shear Butt Joint
 Simplebutt joint loaded in shear
 Average shear stress

Fig. 9–7b
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Transverse Fillet Weld
 Joint
loaded in tension
 Weld loading is complex

Fig. 9–8

Fig. 9–9

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Transverse Fillet Weld
 Summation of forces

 Law of sines

 Solving for throat thickness t

Fig. 9–9
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Transverse Fillet Weld
 Nominal stresses at angle 

 Von Mises Stress at angle 

Fig. 9–9
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Transverse Fillet Weld
 Largest von Mises stress occurs at  = 62.5º with value of
' = 2.16F/(hl)
 Maximum shear stress occurs at  = 67.5º with value of
max = 1.207F/(hl)

Fig. 9–9

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Experimental Stresses in Transverse Fillet Weld
 Experimental results are more complex

Fig. 9–10

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Transverse Fillet Weld Simplified Model
 No analytical approach accurately predicts the experimentally
measured stresses.
 Standard practice is to use a simple and conservative model
 Assume the external load is carried entirely by shear forces on
the minimum throat area.

 By ignoring normal stress on throat, the shearing stresses are


inflated sufficiently to render the model conservative.
 By comparison with previous maximum shear stress model, this
inflates estimated shear stress by factor of 1.414/1.207 = 1.17.

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Parallel Fillet Welds
 Same equation also applies for simpler case of simple shear
loading in fillet weld

Fig. 9–11
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Fillet Welds Loaded in Torsion
 Filletwelds carrying both
direct shear V and moment M
 Primary shear

 Secondary shear

 A is the throat area of all


welds
 r is distance from centroid of
weld group to point of
interest Fig. 9–12
 J is second polar moment of
area of weld group about
centroid of group Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Example of Finding A and J
 Rectangles represent
throat areas. t = 0.707 h

Fig. 9–13

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example of Finding A and J
 Note that t3 terms will be
very small compared to
b3 and d3
 Usually neglected
 Leaves JG1 and JG2 linear
in weld width
 Can normalize by
treating each weld as a
line with unit thickness t
 Results in unit second
polar moment of area, Ju
 Since t = 0.707h,
Fig. 9–13
J = 0.707hJu
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Common Torsional Properties of Fillet Welds (Table 9–1)

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Common Torsional Properties of Fillet Welds (Table 9–1)

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–1

Fig. 9–14

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–1

Fig. 9–15
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Example 9–1

Fig. 9–15
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Example 9–1

Fig. 9–15
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Example 9–1

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–1

Fig. 9–16
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Example 9–1

Fig. 9–16 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Fillet Welds Loaded in Bending

Fig. 9–17

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Bending Properties of Fillet Welds (Table 9–2)

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Bending Properties of Fillet Welds (Table 9–2)

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Strength of Welded Joints
 Must check for failure in parent material and in weld
 Weld strength is dependent on choice of electrode material
 Weld material is often stronger than parent material
 Parent material experiences heat treatment near weld
 Cold drawn parent material may become more like hot rolled in
vicinity of weld
 Often welded joints are designed by following codes rather than
designing by the conventional factor of safety method

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Minimum Weld-Metal Properties (Table 9–3)

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Stresses Permitted by the AISC Code for Weld Metal

Table 9–4

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Fatigue Stress-Concentration Factors

 Kfs appropriate for application to shear stresses


 Use for parent metal and for weld metal

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Allowable Load or Various Sizes of Fillet Welds (Table 9–6)

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Minimum Fillet Weld Size, h (Table 9–6)

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–2

Fig. 9–18

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–2

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–2

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–3

Fig. 9–19

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–3

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–3

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–3

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–3

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–3

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–4

Fig. 9–20
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Example 9–4

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–4

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–4

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–5

Fig. 9–21
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Example 9–5

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–5

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–6

Fig. 9–22
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Example 9–6

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design


Example 9–6

Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design

You might also like