This document outlines the public policy formulation process. It begins with defining key concepts like policy and public policy. The public policy formulation process has four phases - initiation, generation, implementation, and evaluation. The initiation phase involves agenda-setting, identifying policy issues, and stakeholder engagement. The generation phase is when policies are formulated and drafted. Implementation involves enacting the policies. Evaluation is monitoring and assessing the policies. The document provides details on steps like policy analysis and stakeholder consultation that are part of the initiation and generation phases of the public policy formulation process.
This document provides an overview of policy analysis, outlining several key points:
- It defines policy analysis and describes it as a process used to determine what a policy will or has achieved. Approaches include descriptive analysis of existing policies and prescriptive analysis to formulate new policies.
- The importance of policy analysis is highlighted, such as assessing situations, seeking acceptance, providing opportunities for modification, and facilitating evidence-based decision making.
- Several models of policy analysis are described, including process, substantive, eightfold path, logical-positivist, and participatory policy analysis.
- The use of indicators and outcomes to evaluate policies is discussed, noting they can measure results at the population, agency
Defines the policy,lists the main features of a policy , the step by step process of policy formulation and implementation,describes the criteria to judge the efficacy and chances of success of policy and lastly the weaknesses of policy formulation in a developing country like Pakistan
This document discusses the policy making process. It begins by defining what a policy is, including that it guides decision making and translates vision into action. It then outlines the major steps in policy making - defining the policy issue, developing potential policy options to address it, and making a decision on the best option to implement. It emphasizes that the process should be informed by facts, include input from stakeholders, and involve public debate on alternatives. The goal is to select a policy that benefits the public while respecting individual rights.
- Public policy can be defined as "anything a government chooses to do or not to do" according to Thomas Dye. This definition emphasizes that governments are the primary actors in public policy and their decisions, whether to act or not act, constitute public policy.
- Governments are uniquely able to make authoritative decisions on behalf of citizens, backed by legislation. Public policy also involves a series of interrelated decisions made across government to address problems.
- Studying public policy allows us to scientifically understand the causes and consequences of policies, help solve practical problems, and make policy recommendations. It also allows us to learn what governments are doing in key areas, the causes of their decisions, and the impacts of their policies
The document discusses policy implementation, which involves carrying out the activities designed by the legislative branch to achieve its policy goals. This includes establishing and staffing new agencies or assigning new responsibilities to existing agencies. The implementing agencies then translate the legislative intent into operational rules and guidelines, and coordinate resources and personnel to achieve the intended goals.
The lecture discusses the first stage of the policy process - problem delimitation and recognition. It defines what constitutes a problem, social problem, and policy problem. A social problem becomes a policy problem if it can be addressed through public policy. Problem delimitation in public policy involves structuring and specifying issues to help define the scope of potential solutions. Different problems have varying levels of agreement on values/knowledge, from well-structured to unstructured. The theory of agenda setting explains how issues rise on the agendas of public, policymakers and government. The stage model of the policy cycle is used to analyze the process, though it has limitations as policymaking is complex and non-linear.
This document defines public policy and discusses its key subfields. Public policy is defined as a government's actions or inactions in response to public problems. There is no single agreed-upon definition, but generally it refers to the choices governments make and the outcomes of those decisions, backed by state authority. The main subfields of public policy are policy analysis, policy evaluation, and policy process. Policy analysis focuses on determining the best policy options, policy evaluation examines the consequences of policies, and policy process studies how and why policies are made.
The document discusses the process of public policy. It defines policy and differentiates it from procedures and guidelines. It then outlines the key steps in the public policy process: problem identification, agenda setting, policy making, budgeting, implementation, and evaluation. It notes that key actors in agenda setting include think tanks, interest groups, media, and government officials. The document also discusses who the main players are in making economic policies, noting the roles of the prime minister, donor community, various ministries and constituencies. It provides guidelines for changing policies, emphasizing preparation, planning, personal contact, understanding community perspectives, positivism, participation, publicity, and persistence.
The document outlines the key stages of the policy making process:
1) Issue identification where problems are publicized and gain government attention
2) Agenda setting where the government begins serious consideration of issues
3) Policy formulation where various alternatives are developed and considered
4) Policy adoption where policies are legitimized through official government statements and actions
5) Policy implementation which involves all activities that result from officially adopting a policy.
- Public policy is defined as actions or decisions by government to address public issues through laws, regulations, or programs.
- Three main approaches to analyzing public policy are empirical, which examines facts and impacts; valuative, which determines the worth of policies; and normative, which recommends courses of action.
- Key theories for studying public policy include political systems theory, which views policy as responses to demands on government; group theory, which sees policy as outcomes of group competition and influence; and elite theory, which posits that elites set the policy agenda to serve their own interests.
This document provides an overview of public policy definitions, approaches, and processes. It begins by defining public policy as systems of laws, regulations, and actions by governmental entities to address public issues. The traditional views of public policy are discussed, including definitions that focus on the dichotomy between politics and administration.
The document then examines several models of public policy analysis, including the institutional, process, group, elite, rational, incremental, game theory, public choice, and systems models. It discusses the importance of models in creating order, simplifying complexity, and identifying key elements in the policy process like institutions, stakeholders, formulation, and evaluation.
POLICY MAKING PROCESS training policy influence appiah-kubi, 16 dec 2015
POLICY MAKING PROCESS
Policy
• a statement of intent for achieving an objective.
• Deliberate statement aimed at achieving specific objective
• policies are formulated by the Government in order to provide
a guideline in attaining certain objectives for the benefit of the
people.
• Importance and objective of any policy
• to solve existing challenges/problems in any society
• used as a tool to safeguard and ensure better services to
members of the society.
• Reasons for formulating a Policy
• Reforms (socio-economic, technological advancements, etc)
within and outside the country.
Models of policy making and the concept of power in policy
The document discusses different models of policy making and concepts of power in policy making. It describes four models:
1) The rational model which aims to make the best decision by defining problems, establishing goals, generating alternatives, and selecting the best option.
2) The bounded rationality model which aims for a satisfactory decision by analyzing problems and establishing criteria for acceptable solutions.
3) The incremental model which involves successive limited comparisons and trial-and-error adjustments.
4) The mixed scanning model which combines bounded rationality and incrementalism, using broad goals to guide incremental decisions.
The document also discusses three dimensions of power: decision making power, agenda-setting power, and thought control power. It outlines three sources
This document provides an overview of public policy analysis. It discusses definitions of public policy, typologies of public policy, why governments intervene in markets, models of the policy process, and approaches to policy analysis. The key points are:
1) Public policy is defined in various ways but generally refers to courses of action by governments to address issues of public concern.
2) Public policy can be categorized in typologies such as patronage/promotional, regulatory, and redistributive policies.
3) Governments intervene in markets when societies desire certain goods like healthcare but the free market does not adequately provide them, or when markets fail due to issues like externalities, information problems, or barriers to entry.
The document discusses India's economic policies, including fiscal policy, monetary policy, foreign exchange policy, and foreign investment policy. It provides an overview of the objectives and instruments of each policy area. Fiscal policy aims to achieve desirable price levels, employment, income distribution, and capital formation through public expenditure and taxation. Monetary policy operates through money supply, interest rates, and credit availability to influence spending and prices. Foreign exchange policy moved from control to management with the introduction of the Foreign Exchange Management Act in 1999. Foreign investment policy aims to attract long-term foreign direct investment and allows foreign investors to establish wholly owned subsidiaries in most sectors.
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley presented the Union Budget for 2016-17 and reaffirmed that the economy is on the right track. The budget is aimed at strengthening India's firewalls by ensuring macroeconomic stability and prudent fiscal management; driving growth through domestic demand; and economic reforms and policy initiatives to change lives for the better. With measured focus on social sector reforms and recapitalising India's banking system, this Budget has an overarching focus on improving agriculture, and scaling infrastructure, all of which bode well for the country. The government is now planning to rationalise and channel subsidies to the poor by increasing the burden on the rich, and by increasing spending on public welfare through its own kitty.
Mr. Jaitley said the Union Budget is aimed at improving rural infrastructure and increasing rural income, as the biggest challenge to the economy is agrarian distress. Applauding the budget presented by the Finance Minister, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said the Budget is pro-village, pro-poor and pro–farmers, and is focused on bringing about qualitative changes in the country through a slew of time-bound programmes.
The attached note captures key highlights and summarises major announcements in the Budget.
Please reach out to us should you wish to understand more about the Union Budget and its impact on your business
Modi Effect on the Indian Economy - AJSH & Co. Chartered Accountants (New Del...
Contact: AJSH & Co. Chartered Accountants (New Delhi, India)
The Modi government took charge at the Centre with a promise to bring about many changes in terms of governance. This created a wave of excitement among the people.
The Narendra Modi government has put together an elaborate economic reforms package in sync with the party’s election manifesto.
A "king among kings" is how Anil Ambani, one of India's leading industrialists, described Narendra Modi in January last year, long before the latter entered the race to become the country's next prime minister. After winning the Indian election comprehensively, the business community here is waiting with its arms wide open to embrace Mr Modi. They hope he will be their saviour at a time when the economic growth rate is flagging, investments are dwindling and consumer demand is dropping.
The document provides an overview of strategic factors for firms considering investment in India. It analyzes the country environment including strong economic growth, large consumer market, and improving infrastructure. Government policy aims to increase foreign investment and competition. Local competitors have innovative low-cost products and access to rural consumers. The resources, capabilities, and objectives of multinational companies are also discussed, as well as key strategic choices around greenfield investment, acquisitions, and partnerships.
This document provides an overview of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) that is being implemented in India, including the current state of indirect taxes, how GST will work, and Oracle's approach and roadmap. It discusses the key concepts of GST, including how it will replace existing taxes and function as a single, destination-based tax across India. The document also outlines some of the opportunities for Oracle in areas like GST roadmaps, advisory services, developing custom reporting/settlement solutions, and building capabilities around GST processes and configuration.
The document discusses different classifications of public expenditures. It outlines Mrs. Hicks' classification which separates expenditures into defense, civil, and development. Defense expenditure includes costs for defense equipment and wages for armed, navy, and air forces. Civil expenditure maintains law and order and administration of justice. Development expenditure promotes growth in agriculture, industry, trade, transport, and communication.
Public policy formulation, implementation & evaluation
This document discusses the process of public policy formulation. It defines public policy as plans or actions undertaken by government to achieve broad goals affecting citizens. The policy process is described as cyclical, involving problem identification, assessment, solution development, implementation, and review. Key aspects of policy formulation discussed include setting the policy agenda, developing potential solutions, and constraints influencing decision making such as public opinion, economic factors, and political realities. The stages of policy implementation and potential gaps between policy design and real-world application are also outlined.
The document summarizes key points from India's Budget for 2016-2017 presented by Kishan K Shenoy, Lester Max D souza, and Lathesh Kumar Shetty. It outlines economic growth of 7.6% in 2015-2016, challenges of global slowdown and increased fiscal burden. Allocations target agriculture, rural development, social sectors, education, healthcare, infrastructure, and job creation. Tax rates and slabs are adjusted, and certain deductions are proposed to phase out. Fiscal deficit is retained at 3.5% of GDP to balance growth and fiscal discipline.
This document discusses the eBS R12 tax engine and its implementation for Australian GST. It provides an overview of the tax engine components and configuration steps for GST. It also addresses some challenges with the initial R12 upgrade and provides recommendations for custom reporting and reconciliations for GST purposes.
This document provides an introduction to public policy. It defines public policy as actions taken by governments to address public issues through laws, regulations, funding, and programs. The document outlines the framework for developing public policy, including setting objectives and targets, identifying alternatives, designing and implementing programs, and evaluating impacts. It also discusses different analytical approaches to public policy, the stages of the policy process, challenges with implementation, and criteria for evaluating policies. Key topics covered include the roles of government, rationales for public policy, categories of policies, and steps for policy analysis.
This document provides an overview of the Indian economic and trade policy course structure and evaluation. It discusses key topics like the structure of the Indian economy, sector-specific issues, social sector development, external sector overview and trade policy. It analyzes India's economic growth performance across five-year plans and four phases of development. Some challenges discussed are structural transformation of the economy, employment growth, poverty reduction and the political economy implications of reforms.
This is an analysis on the Capital Expenditure of the 2016 Budget – Appropriation Bill – with special focus on the Number of Capital Projects to be executed by Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs).
This document provides an overview of topics related to the Indian economy that may be covered in the UPSC Prelims 2016 exam, including terms used in the Indian economy, planning, poverty and unemployment, economic reforms, inflation, and monetary policy. It defines key economic concepts and terms, describes India's various Five-Year Plans since 1951 and their objectives, outlines approaches to measuring and addressing poverty, and explains tools and objectives of monetary policy in India like the bank rate, cash reserve ratio, and statutory liquidity ratio.
The document gives highlights from key sectors – agriculture and rural development, banking, financial services and insurance, defence and aviation, e-commerce and retail, energy, FMCG, food & beverages, infrastructure and housing, manufacturing, railways, social welfare, steel and mining, and technology IT & telecom.
Recent data released by Stats SA show that public-sector capital expenditure has risen over the last five years, from a total of R203 billion in 2012 to R284 billion in 2016; an average rise of 8,7% per year. Over R1,2 trillion was spent during this five-year period.
Eskom topped the list as the biggest capital spender of the 772 public-sector entities covered in the report. The power utility contributed 25,7% (R73,0 billion) to total capital expenditure, focusing mainly on the continued construction of the Kusile and the Medupi power stations, and the Ingula Pumped Storage Scheme.
Transnet was the second biggest spender, focusing mainly on maintaining capacity in its port and rail divisions.
For more on this, go to
http://www.statssa.gov.za/?p=10252
The document discusses different economic goals, theories and policies of Democrats, Republicans and other groups. It covers various types of capitalism and economic systems, as well as the influence of corporations, interest groups and government institutions on policy creation. Key economic indicators and theories around supply and demand, laissez-faire, Keynesian and supply-side economics are also examined.
Describes about the meaning of public policy, need and importance of public policies, recent public policies in india, weakness of public policies and remedies to overcome the public policy problems
This document provides a SWOT analysis of the Modi government in India. It details the government's strengths such as minimum government and infrastructure initiatives. Weaknesses include being a single-man government and limited focus on farmers. Opportunities exist in using foreign exchange savings for employment and capitalizing on the large mandate. Threats include limited cash reserves and lack of numbers in the upper house of parliament. Global experts generally view Modi positively and see potential for further reforms leading to strong growth.
The document discusses monitoring, evaluation, indicators, and data quality in the context of management information systems (MIS). It provides definitions and explanations of key concepts:
Monitoring is the regular tracking of project inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes and impacts. Evaluation determines the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of a project. Good indicators for monitoring and evaluation should be useful, valid, reliable, and understandable. Both quantitative and qualitative data and methods can be used. Ensuring high quality data involves clear goals, training, checks and addressing errors. Together, monitoring, evaluation and quality data support effective project management through information systems.
Whole systems change across a neighbourhood
How can we collaborate with people to help them build their resilience? Get under the skin of the culture and the lives people live. Identify people’s feelings and experiences of community and understand what people think is shaped by different values and by the environment and infrastructure around them. The future of collaboration could bring many opportunities but people find it more difficult to live and act together than before. How can we help people…and communities build their resilience? Understand people’s different situations and capabilities to develop pathways that help them build resilient relationships. Help people experience and practice change together. Help people grow everyday practices into sustainable projects. Turn people’s everyday motivations into design principles. Support infrastructure that connects different cultures of collaboration. Build relationships with people designing in collaboration for the future…now.
Metrics is a hot topic within all fundraising fields. Measurement models have been established for monitoring the work of frontline fundraisers in order to assess the variety of activities performed as well as the schedule, pace, and outcomes of those activities. With this information in hand, choices can be made about which fundraising activities are most effective in achieving the desired donor behavior, most obviously giving.
Organizational Capacity-Building Series - Session 6: Program Evaluation
This document summarizes a presentation on program evaluation for NGO partner organizations. It defines program evaluation as the systematic process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to make necessary decisions. There are two main types of evaluations: process evaluations, which verify proper implementation, and outcome evaluations, which assess a program's effectiveness and impact. The presentation outlines key steps for developing an evaluation plan, including determining the purpose and audience, identifying evaluation questions, choosing a methodology, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting findings. It also discusses important considerations like the appropriate evaluator and presents an activity for participants to develop strategies, outcomes, and discuss an evaluation plan for one of their program objectives.
Evaluability Assessments and Choice of Evaluation Methods
The document discusses evaluability assessments (EAs) and how they can inform the choice of evaluation methods. Key points:
- EAs examine a project's design, available information, and context to determine if and how an evaluation could be conducted. They help ensure evaluations are useful and feasible.
- Common EA steps include reviewing documentation, engaging stakeholders, and making recommendations about a project's logic, monitoring systems, and potential evaluation approaches.
- Choosing evaluation methods depends on the EA results as well as the evaluation's purpose, required credibility, complexity of the intervention, and available resources. Methods like experiments provide strong evidence of impact but are difficult to implement.
- EAs improve evaluation quality by engaging
This document provides an overview of monitoring and evaluation concepts for designing M&E frameworks and plans. It discusses the key components of an M&E framework including objectives, indicators, data collection, responsibilities and frequency. Examples are provided of frameworks for different public health programs addressing problems like maternal mortality and fertility. Participants are guided through exercises to identify health problems, program objectives, and indicators for sample case studies. The document emphasizes establishing valid, reliable and timely indicators that are consistent with program design and aid management and evaluation of progress toward objectives. It also covers developing a full M&E framework with defined indicators, data sources and collection responsibilities.
Assessment MEAL Frameworks in scientific field.ppt
This document provides an overview of monitoring and evaluation concepts for designing M&E frameworks and plans. It discusses the difference between program frameworks and M&E frameworks, and how to identify appropriate indicators. Participants are guided through exercises to develop a program logic model and select indicators for a sample public health case study. Key aspects of M&E frameworks like data sources, collection methods and responsibilities are reviewed. The document emphasizes setting realistic expectations and adapting the M&E plan if funding is reduced.
This document provides guidance on conducting a needs assessment. It defines a needs assessment as a systematic process to determine gaps between current and desired conditions. It outlines the goals, types, techniques, and steps involved in needs assessment. This includes collecting both hard and soft data, using methods like questionnaires, focus groups, and secondary data. The document emphasizes obtaining institutional approval when needed and establishing a planning team to guide the process. The overall purpose is to learn about problems and design effective programs to address identified needs and gaps.
Public policy implementation and programs are shaped by various factors including expertise, leadership, politics, and budgets. Programs operationalize public policy goals to address societal problems. The policymaking process involves legislative development of policies, administrative implementation through rulemaking and programs, and judicial/legislative review. Effective implementation requires planning, interpretation of legislative intent, and application of programs. Evaluation determines program success through data collection and analysis methods like before/after studies and controlled experiments. Evaluation results inform continuation, termination, or changes to policy and future planning.
Module 4.2 - Performance management
The SENSES project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF and IPA)
For more information check the official website: http://www.interreg-danube.eu/senses
This document provides an introduction to public policy analysis. It defines key terms like policy, analysis, and public policy analysis. Public policy is described as a course of action by governments to address citizen needs defined by constitutions. Public policy analysis involves assessing alternatives to satisfy goals and values. The document outlines theories of public choice and discusses how political actors like politicians, voters, bureaucrats and interest groups behave according to self-interest. It also examines the characteristics, stages, and uses of public policy analysis.
This document discusses policy implementation. It defines implementation as converting policy intentions into actions and outcomes. It describes top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation and categories for identifying problems. Challenges to implementation include lack of support, capacity issues, and barriers like weak political support, poor design, and limited funding. Strategies for managers include designing policies with implementation in mind, mobilizing resources quickly while building capacity, and managing the change process. Understanding context is also important to successful implementation.
This document outlines factors that contribute to both the success and failure of social programs. Key factors for success include social acceptability, unity of purpose among all groups, and having a critical mass of supporters. Sufficient resources, clear communication and coordination are also important. Potential barriers include a lack of defined aims or objectives, problematic attitudes, limited resources and support, unpreparedness, and over-reliance on outside help.
This document outlines the public policy formulation process. It begins with defining key concepts like policy and public policy. The public policy formulation process has four phases - initiation, generation, implementation, and evaluation. The initiation phase involves agenda-setting, identifying policy issues, and stakeholder engagement. The generation phase is when policies are formulated and drafted. Implementation involves enacting the policies. Evaluation is monitoring and assessing the policies. The document provides details on steps like policy analysis and stakeholder consultation that are part of the initiation and generation phases of the public policy formulation process.
This document provides an overview of policy analysis, outlining several key points:
- It defines policy analysis and describes it as a process used to determine what a policy will or has achieved. Approaches include descriptive analysis of existing policies and prescriptive analysis to formulate new policies.
- The importance of policy analysis is highlighted, such as assessing situations, seeking acceptance, providing opportunities for modification, and facilitating evidence-based decision making.
- Several models of policy analysis are described, including process, substantive, eightfold path, logical-positivist, and participatory policy analysis.
- The use of indicators and outcomes to evaluate policies is discussed, noting they can measure results at the population, agency
Defines the policy,lists the main features of a policy , the step by step process of policy formulation and implementation,describes the criteria to judge the efficacy and chances of success of policy and lastly the weaknesses of policy formulation in a developing country like Pakistan
This document discusses the policy making process. It begins by defining what a policy is, including that it guides decision making and translates vision into action. It then outlines the major steps in policy making - defining the policy issue, developing potential policy options to address it, and making a decision on the best option to implement. It emphasizes that the process should be informed by facts, include input from stakeholders, and involve public debate on alternatives. The goal is to select a policy that benefits the public while respecting individual rights.
- Public policy can be defined as "anything a government chooses to do or not to do" according to Thomas Dye. This definition emphasizes that governments are the primary actors in public policy and their decisions, whether to act or not act, constitute public policy.
- Governments are uniquely able to make authoritative decisions on behalf of citizens, backed by legislation. Public policy also involves a series of interrelated decisions made across government to address problems.
- Studying public policy allows us to scientifically understand the causes and consequences of policies, help solve practical problems, and make policy recommendations. It also allows us to learn what governments are doing in key areas, the causes of their decisions, and the impacts of their policies
The document discusses policy implementation, which involves carrying out the activities designed by the legislative branch to achieve its policy goals. This includes establishing and staffing new agencies or assigning new responsibilities to existing agencies. The implementing agencies then translate the legislative intent into operational rules and guidelines, and coordinate resources and personnel to achieve the intended goals.
The lecture discusses the first stage of the policy process - problem delimitation and recognition. It defines what constitutes a problem, social problem, and policy problem. A social problem becomes a policy problem if it can be addressed through public policy. Problem delimitation in public policy involves structuring and specifying issues to help define the scope of potential solutions. Different problems have varying levels of agreement on values/knowledge, from well-structured to unstructured. The theory of agenda setting explains how issues rise on the agendas of public, policymakers and government. The stage model of the policy cycle is used to analyze the process, though it has limitations as policymaking is complex and non-linear.
This document defines public policy and discusses its key subfields. Public policy is defined as a government's actions or inactions in response to public problems. There is no single agreed-upon definition, but generally it refers to the choices governments make and the outcomes of those decisions, backed by state authority. The main subfields of public policy are policy analysis, policy evaluation, and policy process. Policy analysis focuses on determining the best policy options, policy evaluation examines the consequences of policies, and policy process studies how and why policies are made.
The document discusses the process of public policy. It defines policy and differentiates it from procedures and guidelines. It then outlines the key steps in the public policy process: problem identification, agenda setting, policy making, budgeting, implementation, and evaluation. It notes that key actors in agenda setting include think tanks, interest groups, media, and government officials. The document also discusses who the main players are in making economic policies, noting the roles of the prime minister, donor community, various ministries and constituencies. It provides guidelines for changing policies, emphasizing preparation, planning, personal contact, understanding community perspectives, positivism, participation, publicity, and persistence.
The document outlines the key stages of the policy making process:
1) Issue identification where problems are publicized and gain government attention
2) Agenda setting where the government begins serious consideration of issues
3) Policy formulation where various alternatives are developed and considered
4) Policy adoption where policies are legitimized through official government statements and actions
5) Policy implementation which involves all activities that result from officially adopting a policy.
- Public policy is defined as actions or decisions by government to address public issues through laws, regulations, or programs.
- Three main approaches to analyzing public policy are empirical, which examines facts and impacts; valuative, which determines the worth of policies; and normative, which recommends courses of action.
- Key theories for studying public policy include political systems theory, which views policy as responses to demands on government; group theory, which sees policy as outcomes of group competition and influence; and elite theory, which posits that elites set the policy agenda to serve their own interests.
This document provides an overview of public policy definitions, approaches, and processes. It begins by defining public policy as systems of laws, regulations, and actions by governmental entities to address public issues. The traditional views of public policy are discussed, including definitions that focus on the dichotomy between politics and administration.
The document then examines several models of public policy analysis, including the institutional, process, group, elite, rational, incremental, game theory, public choice, and systems models. It discusses the importance of models in creating order, simplifying complexity, and identifying key elements in the policy process like institutions, stakeholders, formulation, and evaluation.
POLICY MAKING PROCESS
Policy
• a statement of intent for achieving an objective.
• Deliberate statement aimed at achieving specific objective
• policies are formulated by the Government in order to provide
a guideline in attaining certain objectives for the benefit of the
people.
• Importance and objective of any policy
• to solve existing challenges/problems in any society
• used as a tool to safeguard and ensure better services to
members of the society.
• Reasons for formulating a Policy
• Reforms (socio-economic, technological advancements, etc)
within and outside the country.
Models of policy making and the concept of power in policyNayyar Kazmi
The document discusses different models of policy making and concepts of power in policy making. It describes four models:
1) The rational model which aims to make the best decision by defining problems, establishing goals, generating alternatives, and selecting the best option.
2) The bounded rationality model which aims for a satisfactory decision by analyzing problems and establishing criteria for acceptable solutions.
3) The incremental model which involves successive limited comparisons and trial-and-error adjustments.
4) The mixed scanning model which combines bounded rationality and incrementalism, using broad goals to guide incremental decisions.
The document also discusses three dimensions of power: decision making power, agenda-setting power, and thought control power. It outlines three sources
This document provides an overview of public policy analysis. It discusses definitions of public policy, typologies of public policy, why governments intervene in markets, models of the policy process, and approaches to policy analysis. The key points are:
1) Public policy is defined in various ways but generally refers to courses of action by governments to address issues of public concern.
2) Public policy can be categorized in typologies such as patronage/promotional, regulatory, and redistributive policies.
3) Governments intervene in markets when societies desire certain goods like healthcare but the free market does not adequately provide them, or when markets fail due to issues like externalities, information problems, or barriers to entry.
The document discusses India's economic policies, including fiscal policy, monetary policy, foreign exchange policy, and foreign investment policy. It provides an overview of the objectives and instruments of each policy area. Fiscal policy aims to achieve desirable price levels, employment, income distribution, and capital formation through public expenditure and taxation. Monetary policy operates through money supply, interest rates, and credit availability to influence spending and prices. Foreign exchange policy moved from control to management with the introduction of the Foreign Exchange Management Act in 1999. Foreign investment policy aims to attract long-term foreign direct investment and allows foreign investors to establish wholly owned subsidiaries in most sectors.
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley presented the Union Budget for 2016-17 and reaffirmed that the economy is on the right track. The budget is aimed at strengthening India's firewalls by ensuring macroeconomic stability and prudent fiscal management; driving growth through domestic demand; and economic reforms and policy initiatives to change lives for the better. With measured focus on social sector reforms and recapitalising India's banking system, this Budget has an overarching focus on improving agriculture, and scaling infrastructure, all of which bode well for the country. The government is now planning to rationalise and channel subsidies to the poor by increasing the burden on the rich, and by increasing spending on public welfare through its own kitty.
Mr. Jaitley said the Union Budget is aimed at improving rural infrastructure and increasing rural income, as the biggest challenge to the economy is agrarian distress. Applauding the budget presented by the Finance Minister, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said the Budget is pro-village, pro-poor and pro–farmers, and is focused on bringing about qualitative changes in the country through a slew of time-bound programmes.
The attached note captures key highlights and summarises major announcements in the Budget.
Please reach out to us should you wish to understand more about the Union Budget and its impact on your business
Modi Effect on the Indian Economy - AJSH & Co. Chartered Accountants (New Del...TIAG_Alliance
Contact: AJSH & Co. Chartered Accountants (New Delhi, India)
The Modi government took charge at the Centre with a promise to bring about many changes in terms of governance. This created a wave of excitement among the people.
The Narendra Modi government has put together an elaborate economic reforms package in sync with the party’s election manifesto.
A "king among kings" is how Anil Ambani, one of India's leading industrialists, described Narendra Modi in January last year, long before the latter entered the race to become the country's next prime minister. After winning the Indian election comprehensively, the business community here is waiting with its arms wide open to embrace Mr Modi. They hope he will be their saviour at a time when the economic growth rate is flagging, investments are dwindling and consumer demand is dropping.
The document provides an overview of strategic factors for firms considering investment in India. It analyzes the country environment including strong economic growth, large consumer market, and improving infrastructure. Government policy aims to increase foreign investment and competition. Local competitors have innovative low-cost products and access to rural consumers. The resources, capabilities, and objectives of multinational companies are also discussed, as well as key strategic choices around greenfield investment, acquisitions, and partnerships.
This document provides an overview of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) that is being implemented in India, including the current state of indirect taxes, how GST will work, and Oracle's approach and roadmap. It discusses the key concepts of GST, including how it will replace existing taxes and function as a single, destination-based tax across India. The document also outlines some of the opportunities for Oracle in areas like GST roadmaps, advisory services, developing custom reporting/settlement solutions, and building capabilities around GST processes and configuration.
The document discusses different classifications of public expenditures. It outlines Mrs. Hicks' classification which separates expenditures into defense, civil, and development. Defense expenditure includes costs for defense equipment and wages for armed, navy, and air forces. Civil expenditure maintains law and order and administration of justice. Development expenditure promotes growth in agriculture, industry, trade, transport, and communication.
This document discusses the process of public policy formulation. It defines public policy as plans or actions undertaken by government to achieve broad goals affecting citizens. The policy process is described as cyclical, involving problem identification, assessment, solution development, implementation, and review. Key aspects of policy formulation discussed include setting the policy agenda, developing potential solutions, and constraints influencing decision making such as public opinion, economic factors, and political realities. The stages of policy implementation and potential gaps between policy design and real-world application are also outlined.
The document summarizes key points from India's Budget for 2016-2017 presented by Kishan K Shenoy, Lester Max D souza, and Lathesh Kumar Shetty. It outlines economic growth of 7.6% in 2015-2016, challenges of global slowdown and increased fiscal burden. Allocations target agriculture, rural development, social sectors, education, healthcare, infrastructure, and job creation. Tax rates and slabs are adjusted, and certain deductions are proposed to phase out. Fiscal deficit is retained at 3.5% of GDP to balance growth and fiscal discipline.
This document discusses the eBS R12 tax engine and its implementation for Australian GST. It provides an overview of the tax engine components and configuration steps for GST. It also addresses some challenges with the initial R12 upgrade and provides recommendations for custom reporting and reconciliations for GST purposes.
This document provides an introduction to public policy. It defines public policy as actions taken by governments to address public issues through laws, regulations, funding, and programs. The document outlines the framework for developing public policy, including setting objectives and targets, identifying alternatives, designing and implementing programs, and evaluating impacts. It also discusses different analytical approaches to public policy, the stages of the policy process, challenges with implementation, and criteria for evaluating policies. Key topics covered include the roles of government, rationales for public policy, categories of policies, and steps for policy analysis.
This document provides an overview of the Indian economic and trade policy course structure and evaluation. It discusses key topics like the structure of the Indian economy, sector-specific issues, social sector development, external sector overview and trade policy. It analyzes India's economic growth performance across five-year plans and four phases of development. Some challenges discussed are structural transformation of the economy, employment growth, poverty reduction and the political economy implications of reforms.
This is an analysis on the Capital Expenditure of the 2016 Budget – Appropriation Bill – with special focus on the Number of Capital Projects to be executed by Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs).
This document provides an overview of topics related to the Indian economy that may be covered in the UPSC Prelims 2016 exam, including terms used in the Indian economy, planning, poverty and unemployment, economic reforms, inflation, and monetary policy. It defines key economic concepts and terms, describes India's various Five-Year Plans since 1951 and their objectives, outlines approaches to measuring and addressing poverty, and explains tools and objectives of monetary policy in India like the bank rate, cash reserve ratio, and statutory liquidity ratio.
The document gives highlights from key sectors – agriculture and rural development, banking, financial services and insurance, defence and aviation, e-commerce and retail, energy, FMCG, food & beverages, infrastructure and housing, manufacturing, railways, social welfare, steel and mining, and technology IT & telecom.
Recent data released by Stats SA show that public-sector capital expenditure has risen over the last five years, from a total of R203 billion in 2012 to R284 billion in 2016; an average rise of 8,7% per year. Over R1,2 trillion was spent during this five-year period.
Eskom topped the list as the biggest capital spender of the 772 public-sector entities covered in the report. The power utility contributed 25,7% (R73,0 billion) to total capital expenditure, focusing mainly on the continued construction of the Kusile and the Medupi power stations, and the Ingula Pumped Storage Scheme.
Transnet was the second biggest spender, focusing mainly on maintaining capacity in its port and rail divisions.
For more on this, go to
http://www.statssa.gov.za/?p=10252
The document discusses different economic goals, theories and policies of Democrats, Republicans and other groups. It covers various types of capitalism and economic systems, as well as the influence of corporations, interest groups and government institutions on policy creation. Key economic indicators and theories around supply and demand, laissez-faire, Keynesian and supply-side economics are also examined.
Describes about the meaning of public policy, need and importance of public policies, recent public policies in india, weakness of public policies and remedies to overcome the public policy problems
This document provides a SWOT analysis of the Modi government in India. It details the government's strengths such as minimum government and infrastructure initiatives. Weaknesses include being a single-man government and limited focus on farmers. Opportunities exist in using foreign exchange savings for employment and capitalizing on the large mandate. Threats include limited cash reserves and lack of numbers in the upper house of parliament. Global experts generally view Modi positively and see potential for further reforms leading to strong growth.
The document discusses monitoring, evaluation, indicators, and data quality in the context of management information systems (MIS). It provides definitions and explanations of key concepts:
Monitoring is the regular tracking of project inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes and impacts. Evaluation determines the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of a project. Good indicators for monitoring and evaluation should be useful, valid, reliable, and understandable. Both quantitative and qualitative data and methods can be used. Ensuring high quality data involves clear goals, training, checks and addressing errors. Together, monitoring, evaluation and quality data support effective project management through information systems.
Whole systems change across a neighbourhood
How can we collaborate with people to help them build their resilience? Get under the skin of the culture and the lives people live. Identify people’s feelings and experiences of community and understand what people think is shaped by different values and by the environment and infrastructure around them. The future of collaboration could bring many opportunities but people find it more difficult to live and act together than before. How can we help people…and communities build their resilience? Understand people’s different situations and capabilities to develop pathways that help them build resilient relationships. Help people experience and practice change together. Help people grow everyday practices into sustainable projects. Turn people’s everyday motivations into design principles. Support infrastructure that connects different cultures of collaboration. Build relationships with people designing in collaboration for the future…now.
Metrics is a hot topic within all fundraising fields. Measurement models have been established for monitoring the work of frontline fundraisers in order to assess the variety of activities performed as well as the schedule, pace, and outcomes of those activities. With this information in hand, choices can be made about which fundraising activities are most effective in achieving the desired donor behavior, most obviously giving.
Organizational Capacity-Building Series - Session 6: Program EvaluationINGENAES
This document summarizes a presentation on program evaluation for NGO partner organizations. It defines program evaluation as the systematic process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to make necessary decisions. There are two main types of evaluations: process evaluations, which verify proper implementation, and outcome evaluations, which assess a program's effectiveness and impact. The presentation outlines key steps for developing an evaluation plan, including determining the purpose and audience, identifying evaluation questions, choosing a methodology, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting findings. It also discusses important considerations like the appropriate evaluator and presents an activity for participants to develop strategies, outcomes, and discuss an evaluation plan for one of their program objectives.
Evaluability Assessments and Choice of Evaluation MethodsDebbie_at_IDS
The document discusses evaluability assessments (EAs) and how they can inform the choice of evaluation methods. Key points:
- EAs examine a project's design, available information, and context to determine if and how an evaluation could be conducted. They help ensure evaluations are useful and feasible.
- Common EA steps include reviewing documentation, engaging stakeholders, and making recommendations about a project's logic, monitoring systems, and potential evaluation approaches.
- Choosing evaluation methods depends on the EA results as well as the evaluation's purpose, required credibility, complexity of the intervention, and available resources. Methods like experiments provide strong evidence of impact but are difficult to implement.
- EAs improve evaluation quality by engaging
This document provides an overview of monitoring and evaluation concepts for designing M&E frameworks and plans. It discusses the key components of an M&E framework including objectives, indicators, data collection, responsibilities and frequency. Examples are provided of frameworks for different public health programs addressing problems like maternal mortality and fertility. Participants are guided through exercises to identify health problems, program objectives, and indicators for sample case studies. The document emphasizes establishing valid, reliable and timely indicators that are consistent with program design and aid management and evaluation of progress toward objectives. It also covers developing a full M&E framework with defined indicators, data sources and collection responsibilities.
This document provides an overview of monitoring and evaluation concepts for designing M&E frameworks and plans. It discusses the difference between program frameworks and M&E frameworks, and how to identify appropriate indicators. Participants are guided through exercises to develop a program logic model and select indicators for a sample public health case study. Key aspects of M&E frameworks like data sources, collection methods and responsibilities are reviewed. The document emphasizes setting realistic expectations and adapting the M&E plan if funding is reduced.
This document provides guidance on conducting a needs assessment. It defines a needs assessment as a systematic process to determine gaps between current and desired conditions. It outlines the goals, types, techniques, and steps involved in needs assessment. This includes collecting both hard and soft data, using methods like questionnaires, focus groups, and secondary data. The document emphasizes obtaining institutional approval when needed and establishing a planning team to guide the process. The overall purpose is to learn about problems and design effective programs to address identified needs and gaps.
Public policy implementation and programs are shaped by various factors including expertise, leadership, politics, and budgets. Programs operationalize public policy goals to address societal problems. The policymaking process involves legislative development of policies, administrative implementation through rulemaking and programs, and judicial/legislative review. Effective implementation requires planning, interpretation of legislative intent, and application of programs. Evaluation determines program success through data collection and analysis methods like before/after studies and controlled experiments. Evaluation results inform continuation, termination, or changes to policy and future planning.
Module 4.2 - Performance management
The SENSES project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF and IPA)
For more information check the official website: http://www.interreg-danube.eu/senses
This document provides an overview of a executive masterclass bootcamp on impact measurement hosted by the CSR Training Institute. It introduces the faculty team who will be teaching sessions on impact measurement frameworks, applying frameworks to case studies, SDGs and impact measurement, and emerging trends. It provides backgrounds on each faculty member and their relevant experience. The agenda and objectives of the bootcamp are outlined, focusing on developing an understanding of impact measurement and applying the framework to real projects. Guiding principles for the sessions are discussed and a caution is given around evolving terminology in the field.
Evaluation of SME and entreprenuership programme - Jonathan Potter & Stuart T...OECD CFE
Presentation by Jonathan Potter, OECD LEED Senior Policy Analyst, and Stuart Thompson, OECD LEED Policy Analys, tat the seminar organised by the OECD LEED Trento Centre for the Officers of the Autonomous Province of Trento on 13 November 2015.
https://www.trento.oecd.org
This document discusses the importance of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) for programs and projects. It defines monitoring as an ongoing process of collecting and analyzing data to track progress and make adjustments, while evaluation assesses relevance, effectiveness, impact and sustainability. The key aspects of building an M&E system are agreeing on outcomes to measure, selecting indicators, gathering baseline data, setting targets, monitoring implementation and results, reporting findings, and sustaining the system long-term. A strong M&E system provides evidence of achievements and challenges, enables learning and improvement, and helps ensure resources are allocated to effective programs.
DEFINING THE MARKETING RESEARCH PROBLEM AND DEVELOPING AN APPROACHShashank Kapoor
This document provides an overview of Delphi Research Services Pvt Ltd, a market research and strategic consulting firm based in India. It discusses Delphi's areas of specialization in industrial, business-to-business, social and development research, and specialized consumer research for the services sector. It notes Delphi was established in 1991 and has expertise in research for Indian and international clients. It also briefly outlines Delphi's infrastructure, headquartered in Bangalore with field offices in other major cities, and lists some of its major clients across various industries.
JJ Schmidt, Senior Vice President at York Risk Services Group, presented on making the most of predictive analytics. The presentation covered definitions of key terms, how predictive analytics work by analyzing data to find patterns and insights, and what predictive analytics can do such as improve decision making and reduce costs. Schmidt discussed considerations like tying analytics to objectives and ensuring data quality. He also presented a case study where predictive analytics reduced claim costs and durations. The key takeaways were that predictive analytics can help make decisions more accurately, consistently, and timely by using data as a tool to guide decisions about the past, present, and future.
How to Assess and Continuously Improve Maturity of Health Information Systems...MEASURE Evaluation
This document describes a new toolkit for assessing and continuously improving health information systems (HIS) to achieve better health outcomes. The toolkit includes:
1) A five-stage scale to measure the maturity of six HIS components, from emerging to optimized.
2) An assessment tool that maps the current and desired future stages to guide improvement planning. It is administered through key informant interviews and a stakeholder workshop.
3) The goal is to help countries strengthen their HIS through a collaborative, participatory process focused on setting priorities and tracking progress over time.
Marketing research involves systematically collecting, recording, and analyzing data to solve marketing problems. It has two main components - marketing and research. Marketing refers to creating value for customers, while research refers to a scientific study of a problem. There are three main steps to the marketing research process: 1) defining the problem, 2) designing the research, and 3) collecting and analyzing data. Problem definition involves understanding the client's needs, environment, and objectives. Research design specifies the methodology, including what data is needed and how it will be collected and analyzed. Overall, marketing research links customers and markets to organizations through insights gleaned from a systematic process.
The document outlines DataActiva's approach to program evaluation through 10 tasks:
1) Conduct start-up meetings to discuss the research plan and identify data sources
2) Design surveys for participants, non-participants, and stakeholders
3) Develop a sampling plan to collect necessary information from target groups
4) Collect accurate data from the samples through online/phone/in-person methods
5) Conduct a process evaluation through stakeholder interviews and customer surveys
6) Conduct an impact evaluation combining data sources to assess program effects
7) Reporting will describe methods, results, and provide an assessment of the program
Public policy and program implementation involves several key factors:
- Programs implement public policy and deal with specific societal issues, shaped by various political and non-rational influences
- Policies can be distributive, redistributive, or regulatory in nature and aim to allocate resources across groups
- The policymaking process involves legislative and administrative stages for creating and carrying out policy through programs and projects
- Program evaluation systematically assesses success and involves specification of goals, data collection, and analysis to determine impacts and accountability
- Government evaluates programs through methods like site visits, comparisons, and controlled experiments to establish causality and make continuation/termination decisions
The document discusses various policy instruments used by governments to achieve development goals, including regulatory, economic, and administrative tools. Regulatory instruments include laws and regulations, while economic instruments involve taxation, subsidies, and exemptions. Specific policy objectives center around economic growth, development, quality of life, market improvements, and addressing social/cultural factors. Development plans are highlighted as an example of a coordinated policy instrument used to prioritize and achieve long-term objectives related to industrialization and social transformation through public consultation. Challenges in implementing policy measures include transition difficulties, capacity issues, resistance to changes, time required for legal implementation, and budget constraints.
The document summarizes the process of assigning responsibilities to agencies in Kenya's public sector. It discusses how the original colonial structure was maintained after independence but new impetus was brought by Kenya's 2010 constitution. The main objectives of assigning responsibilities are to efficiently carry out government mandates and achieve goals like economic growth. Factors influencing assignments include laws, policies, and political considerations. Responsibilities are determined by the constitution, acts of parliament, and cabinet requests, and assignments are done through presidential circulars and other directives. Challenges include reorganizing after constitutional reforms, unclear oversight of state corporations, restructuring delays, and overlapping functions.
This document outlines an investment plan roadmap for developing investment plans for the potato and rice value chains in Uganda. It begins by highlighting the importance of agriculture to Uganda's economy. It then discusses challenges facing the sector like low productivity and limited access to markets. The government has instituted policies to address these challenges. The objectives of the investment plans are to identify constraints, determine costs of interventions, expected returns on investments, and contributions to GDP growth. Stakeholder consultations and studies will be conducted to develop the plans using a methodology of mapping constraints, agreeing on interventions and costs. The plans will guide public and private sector investments to stimulate production, processing and market access.
PASIC project -MAAIF Achievements by Simon peter Nsereko pasicUganda
The document provides an overview of major achievements and progress made by the Policy Action for Sustainable Intensification of Cropping Systems in Uganda (PASIC) project in Uganda. Key achievements include staff recruitment, development of annual work plans, formal introduction of the project to local governments, initiation of household surveys and agronomic studies, organization of workshops to develop Zonal Investment Plans, support for policy reviews, and capacity building activities for Ministry of Agriculture staff. The project has made progress in staffing, awareness creation, evidence generation through studies, policy support, and strengthening capacities of partners to undertake evidence-based policy action.
The document summarizes the Republic of Uganda Policy Action for Sustainable Intensification of Cropping Systems in Uganda (PASIC) project. The project aims to improve household incomes, livelihoods, and food security through sustainable intensification of cropping systems. It has four main components: evidence generation, zonal investment plans, capacity building, and policy action. Key activities include specialized studies, trainings, policy dialogues, and dissemination workshops. The meeting's purpose is to create awareness about the PASIC project and begin developing a zonal investment plan for Irish potatoes in Southwestern Uganda.
This document summarizes a meeting of the PASIC project which aims to stimulate policy action to support agricultural intensification in Uganda. It is implemented by various organizations and funded by the Netherlands embassy. The objectives and outputs discussed include gathering evidence on constraints/opportunities for crop intensification, preparing investment plans with stakeholders, addressing bottlenecks in national policies, and strengthening capacities for evidence-based policymaking. Specifically, opportunities for investment in fertilizers, mechanization, storage and processing are presented, and progress on policy actions like national strategies and regulations is reviewed.
In BLOEMFONTEIN ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In BLOEMFONTEIN Mada...508tomato
In BLOEMFONTEIN ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In BLOEMFONTEIN Madadeni In BLOEMFONTEIN ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In BLOEMFONTEIN Madadeni In BLOEMFONTEIN ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In BLOEMFONTEIN Madadeni In BLOEMFONTEIN ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In BLOEMFONTEIN Madadeni In BLOEMFONTEIN ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In BLOEMFONTEIN Madadeni
Presentation by R. Derek Trunkey, an analyst in CBO’s National Security Division, at the 2024 Conference of the Western Economic Association International.
SDG Stocktake Georgia 2024 - SDGs Through the Eyes of Georgia's Business SectorUNGlobalCompactNetwo1
SDGs Through the Eyes of Georgia's Business Sector. The research was carried out by the UN Global Compact Network Georgia in partnership with EY Georgia, funding was provided by Sweden.
In Kempton Park ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Kempton Park MAPETLA525nixie
In Kempton Park ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Kempton Park MAPETLA In Kempton Park ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Kempton Park MAPETLA In Kempton Park ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Kempton Park MAPETLA In Kempton Park ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Kempton Park MAPETLA In Kempton Park ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Kempton Park MAPETLA
In Oakmoor ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Oakmoor Mesinamagentamoselle
In Oakmoor ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Oakmoor Mesina In Oakmoor ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Oakmoor Mesina In Oakmoor ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Oakmoor Mesina In Oakmoor ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Oakmoor Mesina In Oakmoor ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Oakmoor Mesina
The FY2025 Proposed Budget Report provides a comprehensive overview of the financial plan for the upcoming fiscal year for the City of Winter Springs. It outlines the city's revenue sources, expenditure plans, and fiscal policies, emphasizing transparency and fiscal responsibility. Key highlights include:
A total proposed budget of approximately $68.3 million, representing a 6% decrease from the prior fiscal year.
A focus on balancing economic growth with environmental conservation, reflecting the city's commitment to maintaining high-quality government services and public infrastructure.
Detailed breakdowns of budget allocations across various departments, including General Fund, Enterprise Funds, and other governmental funds.
An Executive Summary that reviews the financial outlook, funding sources, expenditure highlights, and personnel costs.
Specific budgetary considerations for major projects, capital outlay, debt service, and interfund transfers.
Projections of changes in fund balance and equity for governmental and enterprise funds, ensuring fiscal sustainability and sound financial management.
The report also discusses challenges faced by the city, such as inflation, infrastructure maintenance, and the need for strategic investments in public services and facilities. It includes detailed appendices with financial data, organizational charts, and a glossary of terms. This document serves as a crucial tool for city officials, stakeholders, and residents to understand and engage with the city's financial planning and priorities for FY2025.
In Johannesburg ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Johannesburg Hazy...ivory3872
In Johannesburg ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Johannesburg Hazyview In Johannesburg ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Johannesburg Hazyview In Johannesburg ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Johannesburg Hazyview In Johannesburg ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Johannesburg Hazyview In Johannesburg ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Johannesburg Hazyview
Political polarization: threat to international cooperation.aimantahira
Political polarization is an existential threat to international cooperation. It undermines the ability of states to collaborate effectively over shared challenges, potentially hindering progress and across border communication on global issues that require coordinated actions. As per UNDP report, it has hijacked the domestic politics of USA so Pakistan with no exception. Ironically speaking, it is not just limited to state affairs but equally affects International treaties and agreements. So eventually influence the global integration. Hence the countries entrenched in partisan bickering find it challenging to forge the alliances necessary to tackle pressing global issues like climate change or international security.
INDUSTRY 5.0 STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION KEYNOTEMichael Rada
INDUSTRY 5.0 PRINCIPLES can be implemented in any environment, any location, without any limitation related to the size.
The first governments of the world named the importance of INDUSTRY 5.0 for national development already in 2023, but struggled with adoption.
This keynote reveal and help to understand what is needed and how to proceed, so as outline the benefits resulting from the implementation
If any questions, feel free to ask
The original presentation can be viewed on YouTube https://youtu.be/YZUfuw3VBnw
3. • Who Evaluates?
• Elites:
– Government Agencies, Think Tanks, National or
International Audit institutions, Regulators
• Interest Groups:
– Trade Associations, Business groups, Pressure groups,
Media
• Citizens:
– Complaints, Whistle Blower laws, Public Opinion, Voting
• Of course, some agencies may be shielded from
evaluations, some may have repeated evaluations
thrust upon them.
Politics of public policy evaluation
4. • Determine policy outcomes
• Identify policy strengths
• Identify and improve weaknesses
• Justify use of resources
• Increased emphasis on accountability
• Professional responsibility to show
effectiveness.
Why evaluate?
6. • Summary process.
Evaluation
Identify
scope and
stakeholders
Analysis
Information
gathering
Identify
sources of
information
Team
Selection
Compare with:
business strategy
business case
Use the information for more effective business
operations
7. • Why are you doing the evaluation?
– mandatory?
– policy outcomes?
– policy improvement?
• What is the scope? How large will the effort be?
– large/small
– broad/narrow
• How complex is the proposed evaluation?
– many variables, many questions?
• What can you realistically accomplish?
Scope of evaluation
8. • There are a number of common challenges that
may be encountered
• the evaluation team need to be aware of these
• although they may not be able to solve them.
Common challenges
9. • more than one organisation involved, no common standard
for measuring and recording benefits and costs
• lack of documentation
• inadequacy of baseline measures - measures of success can
only be made accurately by comparing the level of
performance before implementation
• sensitivities – examining performance may lead to feelings
of insecurity or grievance for those involved
• the organisation is too busy and it never gets it done (there
should be policies to ensure that it is normal practice)
• lack of cooperation by involved agencies.
Challenges:
10. • There is one most important question
• What is it that you want to know about your
policy?
• Once you have defined this make it
measurable
• Do not move forward if you cannot answer
this question!
Ensuring effective and efficient
monitoring
11. • What is the purpose?
• What should we measure to ensure that the policy:
• is producing the required products
• is being carried out to schedule and in accordance with its
resource and cost plans
• remains viable against its business case
• Monitoring activities facilitate the checking and
reporting on progress against the plan
• Control activities promote revisions to be made to the
plan in response to issues discovered during
monitoring.
Monitoring ... for control
12. • To benchmark is to compare performance against a
standard
• To improve the effectiveness of monitoring and
evaluation (M&E) in the policy cycle, benchmarking can
be useful in three ways
1. can help place an outcome in context - was the
achievement good, bad, or indifferent?
2. can help assess the reasonableness of targets that
may be set
3. can help identify specific regions or subgroups whose
exceptionally good or poor results hint at what factors
drive performance.
International comparisons and
benchmarking
13. • Today, there is much online
availability of large
internationally comparable data
sets (such as those in the World
Bank’s Data Development
Platform)
• Plus widely available national
survey data
• It is now considerably easier to
use international data for
benchmarking exercises.
Benchmark with what?
16. • Give an example of a performance indicator
for your area of responsibility ...
Exercise
17. • Consider these assumptions:
• Indicators will provide clear answers to
questions about policy efficiency and
effectiveness
• Indicators will help explain how decisions and
decision outcomes are linked
• Having the right indicators will result in better
decisions.
Performance indicators
18. • Political use – indicators used to support a
predetermined position
• Symbolic use – ritualistic assurance about appropriate
attitudes towards decision-making (“we even
developed indicators”)
• Tactical use – indicators and the process used as a
delaying tactic or substitute for action (“we will do it
later once we have indicators”)
• Conceptual use for enlightenment – change the
understanding of an issue
• Instrumental – direct relationship between indicators
and decision outcomes.
Possible motives
19. • Indicators play an important role in the policy cycle
and can serve a useful purpose
• They can
– Help assimilate and better understand stakeholder views
– Add to the process of governance
– Help guide and mould policy decisions
• Indicators are linked to the governance process ...
• “which can act like a magic bullet causing decision-
making to become instantly objective and scientific”.
Indicators in the Policy Cycle
20. • Saliency
– will anyone care?
• Legitimacy
– can people trust it?
• Credibility
– can people believe it?
• Usability
– can people understand it?
Observing agency outputs
21. Standards for an M&E Plan
• Utility
– serve practical information needs of intended
users
• Feasibility
– be realistic, prudent, diplomatic and frugal
• Propriety
– conducted legally, ethically, and with regard to
those involved in and affected by the evaluation
• Accuracy
– reveal and convey technically accurate
information.
22. Factors to Consider When
Setting Targets
• What can realistically be achieved given the
resources and the program context?
– Baseline levels
– Past trends
– Needs and gaps in services
– Capacity and logistics
– International benchmarking.
23. Approaches to Setting Targets
• Establish final target then plan progress in
between
• Establish intermediate targets
• Assess progress in attaining targets and
readjust, if necessary.
24. • Past trends
• Expert opinion
• Research findings
• What has been accomplished elsewhere
• Client expectations.
Useful Information for Setting Targets
25. • Advocate for the need for M&E
• Understand program goals and objectives
• Identify user needs and perspectives
• Learn about existing data collection systems &
their quality
• Understand indicators that are being collected
and used (or not used)
• Determine capacity for collecting and using data.
Stakeholder Consultation
26. • Developing M&E framework
• Selecting indicators
• Setting targets
• Reviewing results
• Requires building consensus & commitment
and maintaining effective relationships with
intended users.
Stakeholder Participation
27. DEVELOP A DATA COLLECTION MATRIX FOR YOUR PROGRAM. CONSIDER
THE FOLLOWING ISSUES:
• Who will be responsible for data collection and its supervision?
• Who will be responsible for ensuring data quality at each stage?
• How will data quality be checked at every stage?
• How often will the data be collected, compiled, sent, and analyzed?
• What indicators will be derived from each data source?
• How will the data be sent (raw, summary)?
• What tools/forms will be used, if any?
• What resources (staff, office supplies, computers, transportation) will
be needed at each stage?
• Who will analyse the data? How often will analysis occur?
• How often will the results be compiled into reports?
• To whom and how often will the results be disseminated?
Data Collection Plan
28. Developing & Implementing an
M&E Plan: Logic Model
Inputs
•Human
resources
•Understanding
of the program
•Authority and
mandate
•Stakeholders
Processes
•Advocate
•Assess strategic
information needs
•Assess information
systems capabilities
•Achieve consensus
and commitment
•Develop
mechanism for M&E
plan review
•Prepare document
for final approval
Outcomes
Output
•M&E Plan
Document
Short-term
•M&E System for obtaining
Strategic Information
decision making
Long-term
•Evidence-based decisions
for improving programs
Impacts
•Policy delivery
29. • Start early
• Involve stakeholders at all stages in the process
• Assess strategic information needs for intended users
• Assess current capacity and use what is already available
• Avoid duplication of data collection and reporting
• Do not collect information that will not be used
• Review progress / results regularly and make adjustments
to M&E plan, if necessary.
Summary: The Basics
32. • Case study 1
– Continuously troublesome students are excluded from
school to prevent disturbance of well behaved
students
• Case study 2
– in 18th- and 19th-century northern Europe, there was
a “window tax”
– a property tax whose amount depended upon the
number of windows in a house
– an explicit “income tax” was politically unpopular, so
the intention was to create an income tax without
explicitly taxing on the basis of income.
First order and second order
impacts
33. • Unintended consequences arise because we
live in an interconnected and complex world
• Interconnectedness and complexity of the
world imply that a small change in one part of
a system can potentially generate far-reaching
effects in another part of the system
• Also policymakers may be unable to anticipate
or understand how their policies affect the
incentives of individuals within the system.
Complex systems
34. • public policy attempts to address social
problems, often without understanding
the policy’s effects on individuals’
incentives
• systematic consideration of a policy’s
intended and unintended effects is
imperative
• just because a policy could theoretically
affect individuals’ incentives doesn’t mean
that the policy actually will
• the extent to which individuals respond to
incentives is an empirical question, which
requires an empirical answer.
Empirical answers
36. • The good evaluation of a project or a policy
needs on the one hand thorough application
of methodology up to the highest professional
standards ...
• and is on the other hand a creative thought
exercise: what do we really want to know and
how to find out.
Evaluation methodology
37. • If policies are meant to improve on outcomes, they should not be
based on ideology or wishful thinking, but rather on proven
effectiveness
• But obtaining convincing evidence on the effects on specific policies
is not an easy task
• Relevant data on possible outcomes has to be gathered
• Showing a mere correlation between a specific policy or practice
and potential outcomes is not proof that the policy or practice
caused the outcome
• For policy purposes, mere correlations are irrelevant, and only
causation is important
• What would really happen if a specific policy is introduced – would
it really change any outcome that society cares about?
• Evidence-based policy require answers to causal questions.
Overview
38. • The need for evidence-based policy is increasingly
recognised (e.g., Commission of the European Communities
2007)
• Providing empirical evidence suitable for guiding policy is
not an easy task
• It refers to causal inferences that require special research
methods
• Not always easy to communicate due to technical
complexity
• Econometrics is a set of quantitative techniques that are
useful for making "economic decisions“
• Of course, economic decisions are not restricted to those
made by economists ...
Econometrics
39. • The decision of a student to stay an extra year at
university to earn a double degree
• The decision of a spice seller to open a shop in
this village, or another
• The decision of a bank to approve a loan
application
• The decision of a power company to start-up an
extra generator on a certain day
• The decision of a Government to introduce a
purchase tax in order to reduce income taxes.
Examples:
40. • The "efficient allocation of resources" is the subject
matter of economics
• The traditional role of econometricians is to "test"
alternative economic theories
• To confront theories with real data and to reject those
that are not compatible with reality
• It is what transformed economics from an "art" into a
"science“
• However, it only gave the econometrician an indirect
role as an economist's sidekick
• If economists didn't come up with new theories,
econometricians didn't have anything to do!
What is old?
41. • Regardless of what economists do, economic problems
persist in reality and decisions have to be made
• The modern role of an econometrician is therefore more
direct
• Econometricians extract information from the available
data in order to provide support for an economic decision
• The raw material that the econometrician uses is more
often real observed data, instead of economic theory
• In any specific problem if an economic theory that has been
validated by data exists, it will certainly be used
• If no such model exists, however, econometrics must still
make a statistical model for the data, and provide
intelligent support for the decision process.
What is new?
42. • In government decision-making there are always
competing priorities for funds
• The purpose of a CBA is to allow competing policy
priorities to be compared in a consistent way, and for
their economic, social and environmental impacts to be
assessed
• In all areas of policy, the function of the CBA is to assist
policymakers to identify the best way to deliver the
strategic objectives of governments
• And then to assist with the evaluation of the policy.
Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA)
43. 1. needs to be future looking
2. needs to be objective
3. needs to consider implementation risks
4. to be easily understood so it can be subject to a
degree of contestability.
What does a good CBA look like?
44. 1. establishing the base case – or the ‘no change’ policy
option
2. defining the policy options to be evaluated and
compared against the base case and against each
other
3. laying out the estimates and assumptions for external
factors affecting the policy outcomes
4. defining and estimating the costs of a policy proposal
5. defining and estimating the benefits of a policy
proposal
6. drawing a conclusion.
Key steps in a CBA
45. • An initial question ‘what would happen if this investment
did not take place?’
• allows the CBA to compare two futures: the future with the
investment and that without the investment
• The base case does not mean ‘how things have been in the
past’ and should include any observed long term trends
• In particular, the base case needs to account for future
population and economic growth
• All forecasts contain an element of uncertainty
• In order to address this uncertainty, forecasters need to
develop different forecast scenarios (usually low, mid-range
and high scenarios).
1. Establishing the base case
46. • The purpose of any investment proposal is to achieve an
outcome that improves the wellbeing of the community
• In many instances there are multiple approaches that could
achieve the outcome
• Similar to the base case, the policy options in a CBA should
be clearly articulated and reasonable
• It is also important to consider whether there are any
policy options that may have been overlooked and not
included in the CBA
• A well thought-out CBA includes all the feasible options and
provides justification where options have not been covered
• Avoid “Goldilocks” analysis.
2. Defining the policy options
47. • Analysis will be built up from a range of estimates and assumptions
• Estimates are variables where there is existing evidence, preferably
from multiple sources
• Assumptions are variables where there is less robust data and the
team developing the CBA has had to use judgement
• Estimates are clearly preferable to assumptions
• A CBA, however, almost always includes assumptions because not
all of the information needed to perform the analysis is available
• Just because it is necessary to make some assumptions to conduct a
CBA does not mean it is not worth doing as all analysis involves
assumption about the future
• One strength of CBA is that it makes it clear what the key
assumptions are and allows for the systematic testing of
assumptions.
3. Estimates and assumptions
48. • What assumptions need to be made to conduct the
analysis?
• consider the impacts of a proposal across all sectors of
the economy by thinking about the inter-relationships
between sectors (economists term this ‘general
equilibrium analysis’)
• include all intangible costs and benefits where they can
be reliably estimated
• include all subsequent or contingent costs/investments
• analyse over the economic life of the underlying
proposal or assets, subject to a maximum of 20 years.
3. Estimates and assumptions
49. • Takes into account all the impacts of the policy
options that produce undesirable impacts
• A useful way of looking at costs is to identify which
individuals or groups in the community are worse-off
as a result i.e.
– Government
– Business
– The community
• The full range of costs in a CBA should be identified,
even those that may be difficult to measure -
understating or overlooking a cost that is difficult or
impossible to quantify is a common fault with CBAs
• Everything is relative to the base case – that is, the
costs that are additional to the base case.
4. Costs
50. • Helpful to ask, ‘who is made better off as a result of the investment?’ i.e.
– Government: time or money saved through more efficient programs or
processes
– Businesses: reduction in time or cost, particularly with respect to
administration, or improvements in efficiency, productivity and innovation
– The community: increase in welfare, safety, participation and/or connectivity
• Many CBAs will also look at benefits according to the ‘triple-bottom-line’
which covers the positive economic, environmental and social outcomes
of the investment
• While there is nothing wrong with classifying benefits under these
headings, it is crucial to avoid double-counting
• Like the cost side of the CBA, it is important to identify all the benefits
related to the policy options and measure them relative to the base case.
5. Benefits
51. • Finally calculate the value of each policy option taking into account
all future discounted benefits and all future discounted costs
• The final overall value is usually expressed in one of three ways:
– Net present value or Internal rate of return or Benefit-cost ratio
• In a CBA some options may be easier to value than others
• Although CBA places an emphasis on quantifying in financial terms
the impacts of potential options, the CBA should not be biased
towards an option just because it is easy to value
• This does not necessarily make it the best approach
• However, where difficult-to-value impacts are included, document
carefully and transparently the manner in which that has been
done.
6. Drawing a conclusion
52. • An important and often overlooked step, and
purpose is to:
– Identify whether the expected benefits of the
project have been realised
– Assess whether any aspects of the current project
require remedy
– What lessons can be learned from the project for
future investment projects.
Post implementation
53. • Quantitative observations are made using scientific
tools and measurements
• The results can be measured or counted
• Any other person trying to quantitatively assess the
same situation should end up with the same results
• An example of a quantitative evaluation would be
"this year our government paid 4m citizens a pension
totalling $4,000m at an average of $1000 per
pensioner.“
Quantitative
54. • More subjective than quantitative evaluation, qualitative
observations are defined in science as any observation
made using the five senses
• Because people often reach different interpretations when
using only their senses, qualitative evaluation becomes
harder to reproduce with accuracy
• Two individuals evaluating the same thing may end up with
different or conflicting results
• In research and business, qualitative evaluations may
involve value judgments and emotional responses
• An example of a qualitative evaluation is "our government
provided a better pension arrangement last year than this
year."
Qualitative
55. • Both evaluation methods have their benefits, though one is usually
more appropriate than the other in any given situation
• Quantitative evaluation can help remove human bias from a
statistic, making it more of a reliable fact than any piece of
information gathered qualitatively
• Thus, accurate quantitative evaluations can be relied upon as truth
• Qualitative evaluations may also entail truths, but these truths are
harder to get at, and evaluators may not always agree
• Still, qualitative information is invaluable precisely because it
involves human interaction and interpretation
• Many fields need this interpretation in order to decide how to move
forward or to judge the value of past and future sources of data.
Benefits
56. • Individuals or groups are randomly assigned to
either the policy intervention or non-intervention
(control) group and the outcomes of interest are
compared
• There are many methods of randomisation from
field experiments to randomised control trials
• Random allocation design means that systematic
differences between groups are unlikely and so
any differences and changes in outcomes
between the two groups can be confidently
attributed to the policy intervention.
Control groups
58. • Increasing recognition that rigorous evaluation of public
interventions should feature in the policy decision making process
• Yet there is frequently a gap between the desire for information on
the effectiveness of programs and an understanding of the
potential and the limitations of evaluation tools
• What questions can evaluations answer?
• What administrative structures are required to implement them?
• What are the political and social factors surrounding the acceptance
of evaluations by target groups and the public?
• How much do evaluations cost?
• How long do they take to complete?
Cost-implications of different
methodologies
59. • For international aid programmes it is suggested that
the cost of an evaluation is between about 5 and 7
percent of the cost of the program being evaluated as a
rule of thumb (W. K. Kellogg Foundation, 1998)
• Other evidence suggests that there is very little
correlation between the cost of an impact evaluation
and the size of the program being evaluated.
Evaluation costs
60. • Objectives
– the policy questions to be addressed determine how complex
the study design must be and consequently how costly
– simpler is usually better
• Availability of representative socioeconomic data
– if national data exists, alternative methods of selecting a
comparison group can be considered which may be cheaper
than the ideal random assignment design
• Timeframe
– evaluators frequently do not have the luxury of months or years
for data collection
– this lack of time necessitates more creative use of data and
more complicated statistical techniques, potentially raising the
overall price of evaluation.
Cost factors
62. • Conduct a gap analysis
• Determine whether the project
goals were achieved
• Determine the satisfaction of
stakeholders
• Determine the project's costs and
benefits
• Identify areas of further
development
• Report findings and
recommendations.
Questions for post-
implementation review
63. • An equality impact assessment (EIA) is a tool that helps
public authorities make sure their policies, and the ways
they carry out their functions, do what they are intended to
do and for everybody
• Carrying out an EIA involves systematically assessing the
likely (or actual) effects of policies on people in respect of
disability, gender, including gender identity, and racial
equality and, where you choose, wider equality areas
• This includes looking for opportunities to promote equality
that may have previously been missed or could be better
used, as well as negative or adverse impacts that can be
removed or mitigated, where possible.
What is an Equality Impact
Assessment
64. • In many countries, if any
negative or adverse impacts
amount to unlawful
discrimination, they must be
removed
• Typically there are four possible
outcomes and more than one
may apply to a single policy:
– No major change
– Adjust the policy
– Continue the policy (justification)
– Stop and remove the policy.
Possible Outcomes
65. • Statutory Equality Duties Guidance
• Competition Assessment
• Small Firms Impact Test
• Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment
• Wider Environmental Impact Test
• Health and Well-Being
• Human Rights
• Justice Impact Test
• Rural Proofing
• Sustainable Development Impact Test.
Other impact tests include ...