This document discusses the equivalent frame method for analyzing two-way slabs. It introduces the equivalent frame method, which transforms a 3D structural system into a 2D system by representing the stiffness of slab and beam members as Ksb, and the modified stiffness of columns as Kec. This allows the 3D behavior to be analyzed using conventional 2D frame analysis methods. The document then covers determining the values of Ksb and Kec to represent the slab and column stiffness in the equivalent frame.
The document discusses ductility and ductile detailing in reinforced concrete structures. It states that structures should be designed to have lateral strength, deformability, and ductility to resist earthquakes with limited damage and no collapse. Ductility allows structures to develop their full strength through internal force redistribution. Detailing of reinforcement is important to avoid brittle failure and induce ductile behavior by allowing steel to yield in a controlled manner. Shear walls are also discussed as vertical reinforced concrete elements that help structures resist earthquake loads in a ductile manner.
Advancement of softwares is main cause behind comparatively quick and simple
design while avoiding complexity and time consuming manual procedure. However
mistake or mislead could be happened during designing the structures because of not
knowing the proper procedure depending on the situation. Design book based on
manual or hand design is sometimes time consuming and could not be good aids with
softwares as several steps are shorten during finite element modeling. This book may
work as a general learning hand book which bridges the software and the manual
design properly. The writers of this book used linear static analysis under BNBC and
ACI code to generate a six story residential building which could withstand wind load
of 210 kmph and seismic event of that region. The building is assumed to be designed
in Dhaka, Bangladesh under RAJUK rules to get legality of that concern organization.
For easy and explained understanding the book chapters are oriented in 2 parts. Part A
is concern about modeling and analysis which completed in only one chapter. Part B
is organized with 8 chapters. From chapter 1 to 7 the writers designed the model
building and explained with references how to consider during design so that
creativity of readers could not be threated. Chapter 8 is dedicated for estimation. As a
whole the book will help the readers to experience a building construction related all
facts and how to progress in design. Although the volume I is limited to linear static
analysis, upcoming volume will eventually consider dynamic facts to perform
dynamic analysis. Implemented equations are organized in the appendix section for
easy memorizing.
BNBC and other codes are improving and expending day by day, by covering new
and improved information as civil engineering is a vast field to continue the research.
Before designing something or taking decision judge the contemporary codes and
choose data, equations, factors and coefficient from the updated one.
Book for Beginners series is basic learning book of YDAS outlines. Here only
rectangular grid system modeling and a particular model is shown. Round shape grid
is avoided to keep the study simple. No advanced analysis is described and it is kept
simple for beginners. Only two way slab is elaborated with direct design method,
avoiding other procedures. In case of beam, only flexural and shear designs are made.
T- Beam, L- Beam or other shapes are not shown as rectangular beam was enough for
this study. Bi-axial column and foundation design is not shown. During column and
foundation design only pure axial load is considered. Use of interaction diagram is not
shown in manual design. Load centered isolated and combined footing designs are
shown, avoiding eccentric loading conditions. Pile and pile cap design, Mat
foundation design, strap footing design and sand pile concept are not included in this
- The document discusses the design of a combined footing to support two columns carrying loads of 700 kN and 1000 kN respectively.
- A trapezoidal combined footing of size 7.2m x 2m is designed to support the loads and transmit them uniformly to the soil.
- Longitudinal and transverse reinforcement is designed for the footing and a central beam is included to join the two columns. Detailed design calculations and drawings of the footing and beam are presented.
Shear walls are vertical reinforced concrete walls that resist lateral forces like wind and earthquakes. They provide strength and stiffness to control lateral building movement. Shear walls are classified into different types including simple rectangular, coupled, rigid frame, framed with infill, column supported, and core type walls. Design of shear walls involves reviewing the building layout, determining loads, estimating earthquake forces, analyzing the structural system, and designing for flexural and shear strengths with proper reinforcement detailing. The behavior of shear walls under seismic loading depends on their height to width ratio, with squat walls experiencing more shear deformation and slender walls undergoing primarily bending deformation.
this slide will clear all the topics and problem related to singly reinforced beam by limit state method, things are explained with diagrams , easy to understand .
The document discusses the moment distribution method for analyzing statically indeterminate structures. It begins by outlining the basic principles and definitions of the method, including stiffness factors, carry-over factors, and distribution factors. It then provides an example problem, showing the calculation of fixed end moments, establishment of the distribution table through successive approximations, and determination of shear forces and bending moments. Finally, it discusses extensions of the method to structures with non-prismatic members, including using tables to determine necessary values for analysis.
This document provides an overview of design in reinforced concrete according to BS 8110. It discusses the basic materials used - concrete and steel reinforcement - and their properties. It describes two limit states for design: ultimate limit state considering failure, and serviceability limit state considering deflection and cracking. Key aspects of beam design are summarized, including types of beams, design for bending and shear resistance, and limiting deflection. Reinforcement detailing rules are also briefly covered. Design examples are provided to illustrate bending and shear design of beams.
This document provides an overview of different seismic analysis methods for reinforced concrete buildings according to Indian code IS 1893-2002, including linear static, nonlinear static, linear dynamic, and nonlinear dynamic analysis. It describes the basic procedures for each analysis type and provides examples of how to calculate design seismic base shear, distribute seismic forces vertically and horizontally, and determine drift and overturning effects. Case studies are presented comparing the results of static and dynamic analysis for regular and irregular multi-storey buildings modeled in SAP2000.
This document summarizes the key aspects of flat slab construction and design according to Indian code IS 456-2000. It defines flat slabs as slabs that are directly supported by columns without beams, and describes four common types based on whether drops and column heads are used. The main topics covered include guidelines for proportioning slabs and drops, methods for determining bending moments and shear forces, requirements for slab reinforcement, and an example problem demonstrating the design of an interior flat slab panel.
- The document describes the design and detailing of flat slabs, which are concrete slabs supported directly by columns without beams.
- Key aspects covered include dimensional considerations, analysis methods, design for bending moments including division of panels and limiting negative moments, shear design and punching shear, deflection and crack control, and design procedures.
- An example problem is provided to illustrate the full design process for an internal panel with drops adjacent to edge panels.
This document discusses the design of two-way floor slab systems. It compares the behavior of one-way and two-way slabs, describing how two-way slabs carry load in two directions versus one direction for one-way slabs. Different two-way slab systems like flat plates, waffle slabs, and ribbed slabs are described. Methods for analyzing two-way slabs include direct design, equivalent frame, elastic, plastic, and nonlinear analysis. Design considerations like minimum slab thickness are discussed along with examples calculating thickness.
This document discusses ductile detailing of reinforced concrete (RC) frames according to Indian standards. It explains that detailing involves translating the structural design into the final structure through reinforcement drawings. Good detailing ensures reinforcement and concrete interact efficiently. Key aspects of ductile detailing covered include requirements for beams, columns, and beam-column joints to improve ductility and seismic performance. Specific provisions are presented for longitudinal and shear reinforcement in beams and columns, as well as confining reinforcement and lap splices. The importance of cover and stirrup spacing is also discussed.
This document discusses T-beams, which are more suitable than rectangular beams in reinforced concrete. There are two types of T-beams: monolithic and isolated. It provides notations and code recommendations for T-beams from IS: 456. There are three cases for finding the depth of the neutral axis in a T-beam: when it lies in the flange, in the rib, or at the junction. An example problem is worked through to find the moment of resistance for a given T-beam section using the provided concrete and steel properties.
This document provides an overview of design in reinforced concrete according to BS 8110. It discusses the basic materials used - concrete and steel reinforcement - and their properties. It describes two limit states for design: ultimate limit state considering failure, and serviceability limit state considering deflection and cracking. Key aspects of beam design are summarized, including types of beams, design for bending and shear resistance, and limiting deflection. Reinforcement detailing rules are also briefly covered.
This document describes research using neural networks to predict the propagation path of plastic hinges in moment resisting frames under seismic loading. Pushover analyses were conducted on various frame configurations to create a database for training a neural network. The neural network takes frame element stiffness values as input and outputs the plastic hinge condition at different nodes. Training results showed the network could accurately predict plastic hinge distribution and collapse mechanisms. Validation on additional frames found reasonable correlation between predicted and actual plastic hinge statuses. The research demonstrates neural networks may provide a useful tool for assessing frame post-elastic behavior and collapse mechanisms at the design stage.
“REVIEW ON EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS ON STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF FIBER MODIFIE...
This document reviews literature on using natural and synthetic fibers to modify the strength properties of concrete. It summarizes several studies that tested how bamboo, fiberglass, carbon fiber, and basalt fiber reinforcements impacted the bending strength, tensile strength, and deformation of concrete beams compared to steel-reinforced beams. The review found that fiber reinforcements can improve concrete strength characteristics but noted gaps in research on using fiber-reinforced polymer composites as the main reinforcement and on reinforcing hollow concrete columns.
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF THREE STOREY FRAMED BUILDING
This document discusses the history of structural analysis methods. It explains that statically indeterminate structures require analysis to ensure they have sufficient strength and rigidity. Two fundamental methods are described: force methods, which satisfy compatibility equations; and displacement methods, which satisfy equilibrium equations. Specific displacement methods discussed include the slope deflection method, which considers bending deformations, and the moment distribution method introduced by Hardy Cross, which is an iterative method for analyzing frames.
Effect of Moment Capacity Ratio at Beam-Column Joint of RC Framed building: A...
This document reviews research on the effect of moment capacity ratio (MCR) at beam-column joints in reinforced concrete framed buildings. It summarizes several studies that investigated how increasing the MCR, defined as the ratio of column moment capacity to beam moment capacity, improves structural performance during seismic events. A higher MCR promotes a strong-column weak-beam design that increases ductility and lateral strength while reducing structural damage and failure probability. Most codes recommend a minimum MCR of 1.0-2.0, but the ideal ratio may vary based on building design, geometry, and seismic zone. Nonlinear analysis shows higher MCR generally enhances displacement capacity and reduces fragility, helping structures better withstand earthquake forces.
This document summarizes a lecture on the design of reinforced concrete beams for shear. It addresses topics like shear stresses in beams, diagonal tension cracking, types of cracks, shear strength of concrete, web reinforcement requirements, and ACI code provisions for shear design. An example is also presented on calculating the required area of web reinforcement based on the code equations. The document provides information needed to understand and apply the design of beams for shear stresses.
IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Steel Frame Building using Bracing in ETAB Software
This paper compares the seismic analysis of a G+11 square building and L-shaped building using time history analysis in ETAB 17.01 software. Different types of bracing systems are used, including X, V, inverted V, and diagonal bracing. The response of the buildings is compared in terms of displacement, base shear, and pseudo acceleration to determine which type of building and bracing system provides the minimum response. The L-shaped building with X bracing is found to have the minimum displacement, while the square building with X bracing has the minimum base shear and pseudo acceleration.
Comparison Study of Soft Computing Approaches for Estimation of the Non-Ducti...
Today, retrofitting of the old structures is important. For this purpose, determination of capacities for these buildings, which mostly are non-ductile, is a very useful tool. In this context, non-ductile RC joint in concrete structures, as one of the most important elements in these buildings are considered, and the shear capacity, especially for retrofitting goals can be very beneficial. In this paper, three famous soft computing methods including artificial neural networks (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and also group method of data handling (GMDH) were used to estimating the shear capacity for this type of RC joints. A set of experimental data which were a failure in joint are collected, and first, the effective parameters were identified. Based on these parameters, predictive models are presented in detail and compare with each other. The results showed that the considered soft computing techniques are very good capabilities to determine the shear capacity.
This document summarizes a study on using frequency response methods to identify structural damage in layered composite materials. It proposes a new vibration-based technique that uses changes in the frequency response functions (FRFs) of an undamaged structure compared to a damaged one. Most reported works are based on changes in modal parameters, but this new method detects damage through existence, localization and extent using frequency response function curvature. It aims to establish an online damage identification method for laminated composites to address needs for health monitoring of composite structures, as damage alters their dynamic characteristics.
This document summarizes an experimental study on the flexural strengthening of continuous two-span unbonded post-tensioned concrete beams with end-anchored CFRP laminates. Five full-scale beams were tested: one control beam and four beams strengthened with CFRP laminates of varying widths and end anchorage configurations. The study found that CFRP strengthening increased the service load capacity more than the ultimate capacity. Proper end anchorage and installation of the CFRP laminates was important to achieve effective load transfer and prevent premature debonding failures. The strengthened beams exhibited higher stiffness and load capacity compared to the control beam.
1) The document presents the results of a linear and non-linear analysis of reinforced concrete frames with members of varying inertia (non-prismatic beams) for buildings ranging from G+2 to G+10 storeys.
2) Both bare frames and frames with infill walls were analyzed considering different beam cross-sections - prismatic, linear haunch, parabolic haunch, and stepped haunch.
3) The linear analysis was performed using ETABS and considered parameters like fundamental time period, base shear, and top storey displacement. The non-linear analysis used pushover analysis in SAP2000 to determine effective time period, effective stiffness, and hinge formation patterns.
The document describes an upcoming seminar on optimizing the modeling and design of steel structures using the ETABS software. The seminar will cover general modeling techniques, static and dynamic loading, steel frame design, composite beam design, vibration analysis, and pushover analysis. Eight example models will be presented to illustrate skills like modeling curved ramps, shear walls, composite beams, braced frames, and nonlinear dynamic analysis. Attendees will learn how to efficiently model complex steel structures and optimize the design in ETABS.
Modeling and Design of Bridge Super Structure and Sub StructureAIT Solutions
This document discusses modeling and analysis techniques for bridge superstructures and substructures. It covers modeling bridge decks using various element types including beam, grid, plate-shell, and solid models. It also discusses modeling bridge piers and foundations using solid elements, beam elements, or springs to represent soil-structure interaction. The document emphasizes the importance of modeling both superstructure and substructure together to accurately capture their interaction, and discusses challenges like modeling bearings and soil.
The document discusses ductility and ductile detailing in reinforced concrete structures. It states that structures should be designed to have lateral strength, deformability, and ductility to resist earthquakes with limited damage and no collapse. Ductility allows structures to develop their full strength through internal force redistribution. Detailing of reinforcement is important to avoid brittle failure and induce ductile behavior by allowing steel to yield in a controlled manner. Shear walls are also discussed as vertical reinforced concrete elements that help structures resist earthquake loads in a ductile manner.
Book for Beginners, RCC Design by ETABSYousuf Dinar
Advancement of softwares is main cause behind comparatively quick and simple
design while avoiding complexity and time consuming manual procedure. However
mistake or mislead could be happened during designing the structures because of not
knowing the proper procedure depending on the situation. Design book based on
manual or hand design is sometimes time consuming and could not be good aids with
softwares as several steps are shorten during finite element modeling. This book may
work as a general learning hand book which bridges the software and the manual
design properly. The writers of this book used linear static analysis under BNBC and
ACI code to generate a six story residential building which could withstand wind load
of 210 kmph and seismic event of that region. The building is assumed to be designed
in Dhaka, Bangladesh under RAJUK rules to get legality of that concern organization.
For easy and explained understanding the book chapters are oriented in 2 parts. Part A
is concern about modeling and analysis which completed in only one chapter. Part B
is organized with 8 chapters. From chapter 1 to 7 the writers designed the model
building and explained with references how to consider during design so that
creativity of readers could not be threated. Chapter 8 is dedicated for estimation. As a
whole the book will help the readers to experience a building construction related all
facts and how to progress in design. Although the volume I is limited to linear static
analysis, upcoming volume will eventually consider dynamic facts to perform
dynamic analysis. Implemented equations are organized in the appendix section for
easy memorizing.
BNBC and other codes are improving and expending day by day, by covering new
and improved information as civil engineering is a vast field to continue the research.
Before designing something or taking decision judge the contemporary codes and
choose data, equations, factors and coefficient from the updated one.
Book for Beginners series is basic learning book of YDAS outlines. Here only
rectangular grid system modeling and a particular model is shown. Round shape grid
is avoided to keep the study simple. No advanced analysis is described and it is kept
simple for beginners. Only two way slab is elaborated with direct design method,
avoiding other procedures. In case of beam, only flexural and shear designs are made.
T- Beam, L- Beam or other shapes are not shown as rectangular beam was enough for
this study. Bi-axial column and foundation design is not shown. During column and
foundation design only pure axial load is considered. Use of interaction diagram is not
shown in manual design. Load centered isolated and combined footing designs are
shown, avoiding eccentric loading conditions. Pile and pile cap design, Mat
foundation design, strap footing design and sand pile concept are not included in this
- The document discusses the design of a combined footing to support two columns carrying loads of 700 kN and 1000 kN respectively.
- A trapezoidal combined footing of size 7.2m x 2m is designed to support the loads and transmit them uniformly to the soil.
- Longitudinal and transverse reinforcement is designed for the footing and a central beam is included to join the two columns. Detailed design calculations and drawings of the footing and beam are presented.
Shear walls are vertical reinforced concrete walls that resist lateral forces like wind and earthquakes. They provide strength and stiffness to control lateral building movement. Shear walls are classified into different types including simple rectangular, coupled, rigid frame, framed with infill, column supported, and core type walls. Design of shear walls involves reviewing the building layout, determining loads, estimating earthquake forces, analyzing the structural system, and designing for flexural and shear strengths with proper reinforcement detailing. The behavior of shear walls under seismic loading depends on their height to width ratio, with squat walls experiencing more shear deformation and slender walls undergoing primarily bending deformation.
this slide will clear all the topics and problem related to singly reinforced beam by limit state method, things are explained with diagrams , easy to understand .
The document discusses the moment distribution method for analyzing statically indeterminate structures. It begins by outlining the basic principles and definitions of the method, including stiffness factors, carry-over factors, and distribution factors. It then provides an example problem, showing the calculation of fixed end moments, establishment of the distribution table through successive approximations, and determination of shear forces and bending moments. Finally, it discusses extensions of the method to structures with non-prismatic members, including using tables to determine necessary values for analysis.
This document provides an overview of design in reinforced concrete according to BS 8110. It discusses the basic materials used - concrete and steel reinforcement - and their properties. It describes two limit states for design: ultimate limit state considering failure, and serviceability limit state considering deflection and cracking. Key aspects of beam design are summarized, including types of beams, design for bending and shear resistance, and limiting deflection. Reinforcement detailing rules are also briefly covered. Design examples are provided to illustrate bending and shear design of beams.
This document provides an overview of different seismic analysis methods for reinforced concrete buildings according to Indian code IS 1893-2002, including linear static, nonlinear static, linear dynamic, and nonlinear dynamic analysis. It describes the basic procedures for each analysis type and provides examples of how to calculate design seismic base shear, distribute seismic forces vertically and horizontally, and determine drift and overturning effects. Case studies are presented comparing the results of static and dynamic analysis for regular and irregular multi-storey buildings modeled in SAP2000.
This document summarizes the key aspects of flat slab construction and design according to Indian code IS 456-2000. It defines flat slabs as slabs that are directly supported by columns without beams, and describes four common types based on whether drops and column heads are used. The main topics covered include guidelines for proportioning slabs and drops, methods for determining bending moments and shear forces, requirements for slab reinforcement, and an example problem demonstrating the design of an interior flat slab panel.
- The document describes the design and detailing of flat slabs, which are concrete slabs supported directly by columns without beams.
- Key aspects covered include dimensional considerations, analysis methods, design for bending moments including division of panels and limiting negative moments, shear design and punching shear, deflection and crack control, and design procedures.
- An example problem is provided to illustrate the full design process for an internal panel with drops adjacent to edge panels.
This document discusses the design of two-way floor slab systems. It compares the behavior of one-way and two-way slabs, describing how two-way slabs carry load in two directions versus one direction for one-way slabs. Different two-way slab systems like flat plates, waffle slabs, and ribbed slabs are described. Methods for analyzing two-way slabs include direct design, equivalent frame, elastic, plastic, and nonlinear analysis. Design considerations like minimum slab thickness are discussed along with examples calculating thickness.
This document discusses ductile detailing of reinforced concrete (RC) frames according to Indian standards. It explains that detailing involves translating the structural design into the final structure through reinforcement drawings. Good detailing ensures reinforcement and concrete interact efficiently. Key aspects of ductile detailing covered include requirements for beams, columns, and beam-column joints to improve ductility and seismic performance. Specific provisions are presented for longitudinal and shear reinforcement in beams and columns, as well as confining reinforcement and lap splices. The importance of cover and stirrup spacing is also discussed.
This document discusses T-beams, which are more suitable than rectangular beams in reinforced concrete. There are two types of T-beams: monolithic and isolated. It provides notations and code recommendations for T-beams from IS: 456. There are three cases for finding the depth of the neutral axis in a T-beam: when it lies in the flange, in the rib, or at the junction. An example problem is worked through to find the moment of resistance for a given T-beam section using the provided concrete and steel properties.
This document provides an overview of design in reinforced concrete according to BS 8110. It discusses the basic materials used - concrete and steel reinforcement - and their properties. It describes two limit states for design: ultimate limit state considering failure, and serviceability limit state considering deflection and cracking. Key aspects of beam design are summarized, including types of beams, design for bending and shear resistance, and limiting deflection. Reinforcement detailing rules are also briefly covered.
This document describes research using neural networks to predict the propagation path of plastic hinges in moment resisting frames under seismic loading. Pushover analyses were conducted on various frame configurations to create a database for training a neural network. The neural network takes frame element stiffness values as input and outputs the plastic hinge condition at different nodes. Training results showed the network could accurately predict plastic hinge distribution and collapse mechanisms. Validation on additional frames found reasonable correlation between predicted and actual plastic hinge statuses. The research demonstrates neural networks may provide a useful tool for assessing frame post-elastic behavior and collapse mechanisms at the design stage.
“REVIEW ON EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS ON STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF FIBER MODIFIE...IRJET Journal
This document reviews literature on using natural and synthetic fibers to modify the strength properties of concrete. It summarizes several studies that tested how bamboo, fiberglass, carbon fiber, and basalt fiber reinforcements impacted the bending strength, tensile strength, and deformation of concrete beams compared to steel-reinforced beams. The review found that fiber reinforcements can improve concrete strength characteristics but noted gaps in research on using fiber-reinforced polymer composites as the main reinforcement and on reinforcing hollow concrete columns.
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF THREE STOREY FRAMED BUILDINGJoshua Gorinson
This document discusses the history of structural analysis methods. It explains that statically indeterminate structures require analysis to ensure they have sufficient strength and rigidity. Two fundamental methods are described: force methods, which satisfy compatibility equations; and displacement methods, which satisfy equilibrium equations. Specific displacement methods discussed include the slope deflection method, which considers bending deformations, and the moment distribution method introduced by Hardy Cross, which is an iterative method for analyzing frames.
Effect of Moment Capacity Ratio at Beam-Column Joint of RC Framed building: A...IRJET Journal
This document reviews research on the effect of moment capacity ratio (MCR) at beam-column joints in reinforced concrete framed buildings. It summarizes several studies that investigated how increasing the MCR, defined as the ratio of column moment capacity to beam moment capacity, improves structural performance during seismic events. A higher MCR promotes a strong-column weak-beam design that increases ductility and lateral strength while reducing structural damage and failure probability. Most codes recommend a minimum MCR of 1.0-2.0, but the ideal ratio may vary based on building design, geometry, and seismic zone. Nonlinear analysis shows higher MCR generally enhances displacement capacity and reduces fragility, helping structures better withstand earthquake forces.
This document summarizes a lecture on the design of reinforced concrete beams for shear. It addresses topics like shear stresses in beams, diagonal tension cracking, types of cracks, shear strength of concrete, web reinforcement requirements, and ACI code provisions for shear design. An example is also presented on calculating the required area of web reinforcement based on the code equations. The document provides information needed to understand and apply the design of beams for shear stresses.
IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Steel Frame Building using Bracing in ETAB SoftwareIRJET Journal
This paper compares the seismic analysis of a G+11 square building and L-shaped building using time history analysis in ETAB 17.01 software. Different types of bracing systems are used, including X, V, inverted V, and diagonal bracing. The response of the buildings is compared in terms of displacement, base shear, and pseudo acceleration to determine which type of building and bracing system provides the minimum response. The L-shaped building with X bracing is found to have the minimum displacement, while the square building with X bracing has the minimum base shear and pseudo acceleration.
Today, retrofitting of the old structures is important. For this purpose, determination of capacities for these buildings, which mostly are non-ductile, is a very useful tool. In this context, non-ductile RC joint in concrete structures, as one of the most important elements in these buildings are considered, and the shear capacity, especially for retrofitting goals can be very beneficial. In this paper, three famous soft computing methods including artificial neural networks (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and also group method of data handling (GMDH) were used to estimating the shear capacity for this type of RC joints. A set of experimental data which were a failure in joint are collected, and first, the effective parameters were identified. Based on these parameters, predictive models are presented in detail and compare with each other. The results showed that the considered soft computing techniques are very good capabilities to determine the shear capacity.
This document summarizes a study on using frequency response methods to identify structural damage in layered composite materials. It proposes a new vibration-based technique that uses changes in the frequency response functions (FRFs) of an undamaged structure compared to a damaged one. Most reported works are based on changes in modal parameters, but this new method detects damage through existence, localization and extent using frequency response function curvature. It aims to establish an online damage identification method for laminated composites to address needs for health monitoring of composite structures, as damage alters their dynamic characteristics.
This document summarizes an experimental study on the flexural strengthening of continuous two-span unbonded post-tensioned concrete beams with end-anchored CFRP laminates. Five full-scale beams were tested: one control beam and four beams strengthened with CFRP laminates of varying widths and end anchorage configurations. The study found that CFRP strengthening increased the service load capacity more than the ultimate capacity. Proper end anchorage and installation of the CFRP laminates was important to achieve effective load transfer and prevent premature debonding failures. The strengthened beams exhibited higher stiffness and load capacity compared to the control beam.
1) The document presents the results of a linear and non-linear analysis of reinforced concrete frames with members of varying inertia (non-prismatic beams) for buildings ranging from G+2 to G+10 storeys.
2) Both bare frames and frames with infill walls were analyzed considering different beam cross-sections - prismatic, linear haunch, parabolic haunch, and stepped haunch.
3) The linear analysis was performed using ETABS and considered parameters like fundamental time period, base shear, and top storey displacement. The non-linear analysis used pushover analysis in SAP2000 to determine effective time period, effective stiffness, and hinge formation patterns.
Performance based plastic design method for steel concentric bracedEr Sharma
This document presents a performance-based plastic design (PBPD) methodology for designing steel concentric braced frames. The design begins by selecting a target drift and intended yield mechanism. The design base shear is then determined by equating the energy required to push the structure to the target drift with the demanded energy from an equivalent single-degree-of-freedom system. P-Δ effects are considered to determine member strengths. Braces are designed to yield according to plastic design, while beams and columns remain elastic. Three baseline frames are also designed and analyzed to validate the PBPD methodology.
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF BRIDGE WITH TWO ENDS FIXED ON VERTICAL WALL USING FIN...IAEME Publication
The Finite element analyses are conducted to model the tensile capacity of steel fiber-reinforced concrete (SFRC). For this purpose bridge with two ends fixed one specimen are casted and tested under direct and uni-axial tension. Two types of aggregates (brick and stone) are used to cast the SFRC and plain concrete. The fiber volume ratio is maintained 1.5 %. Total 8 numbers of dog-bone specimens are made and tested in a 1000-kN capacity digital universal testing machine (UTM). The strain data are gathered employing digital image correlation technique from high-definition images and high-speed video clips. Then, the strain data are synthesized with the load data obtained from the load cell of the UTM.
The lecture coveres the actuall problem of being the engineer. It conciders the transformation of the minds of professionals from the classical and well-established technics of engineering matter design into the creative art of design corresponded the demands of the XXIst century.
Similar to Lecture 12 equivalent frame method (13)
Professional design drives turnover, return, and growth.
How to strengthen the power of design in your domain?
The key is to introduce, specialize, and organize critical capabilities.
Design capacity thus becomes a strategic advantage: valuable, unique, and organized.
Cases from construction, manufacturing, and servicing provide proof.
Achieve your ambition faster with our subject expertise.
Call on us for instruction, support, or execution.
Request a free quick scan* to start.
*) Ask for our conditions.
https://designimpulse.nl
Mastering Web Design: Essential Principles and Techniques for Modern WebsiteswebOdoctor Inc
Dive into the dynamic world of web design with our comprehensive guide that covers everything from foundational principles to advanced techniques. Whether you're a beginner looking to understand the basics or a seasoned designer aiming to refine your skills, this article offers invaluable insights. Explore topics such as responsive design, user experience (UX) optimization, color theory, typography essentials, and the latest trends shaping the digital landscape. Gain practical knowledge and actionable tips to create visually appealing, functional, and user-friendly websites that stand out in today's competitive online environment. Perfect for designers, developers, and anyone passionate about crafting compelling web experiences, this guide equips you with the tools needed to elevate your web design proficiency to new heights.
A visual identity is the heart and soul of a place, embodying its unique
character and heritage. By carefully preserving this essence, we can ensure
that new elements blend seamlessly, honoring the past while embracing
the future.
Professional Document Editing Services / Bank Statement EditingEdit Bank Statement
Need to modify any document? Look no further! I offer expert editing services for all types of documents, ensuring accuracy and confidentiality. Whether you need adjustments for bank statements, certificates, bills, pay stubs, or any other documents, I can help. Contact me now for prompt and reliable editing services!
Services Offered:
• PDF Editing: Professional edits for all types of PDF documents.
• Bank Statement Editing: Accurate and detailed edits for any bank statement.
• Document Editing: Comprehensive edits for all kinds of documents.
• Certificate Correction: Correct and improve certificates for clarity and accuracy.
• Bill Editing: Modify and correct any bill details as needed.
• Pay Stub Editing: Accurate editing of pay stubs for personal or professional use.
• Anything You Want to Edit: Custom editing services tailored to your needs.
#EditBankStatement #BankStatementEditing #Bank #StatementEdit #BankStatementEdit #BankStatementEditing #EditPaystubs #FinancialServices #Paystubs #CheckStubs #CheckStubService #BankServices #USA #Canada #Texas #California #America #UK #London #EditPDF #BankFiles #BankFinance #Statements #BankStatement #BankStatements #BankStatementLoan #EditBankStatementPhotoshop #EditBankStatementsFree #ExplorePage #Top #ForYou #FYP #Instagram #Documents #Edits #Photoshop #GraphicDesign #Illustrator #Illustration #Creative #Design #Designer #EditDrivingLicense #EditPaystubs #EditBankStatement #EditAnyDocument #Editing #Paystubs #PaystubServices #PaystubsNeeded #PaystubService #PaystubService #EditPDFOnlineFree #PDFToWord #PDFEditorFree #PDFEditorOnline #HowToEditABankStatement #FakeBankStatement #HowToEditBankStatementPDF #PDFEditor
An Introduction to Housing: Core Concepts and Historical Evolution from Prehi...Aditi Sh.
This comprehensive PDF explores the definition and fundamental core of housing neighborhoods, tracing the evolution of housing from prehistoric times 2.5 million years ago to the early 19th century Industrial Revolution. It delves into the various stages of housing development, highlighting key innovations, cultural influences, and technological advancements that shaped the way humans have built and inhabited homes throughout history. This document serves as an essential resource for understanding the dynamic history of human habitation and the ongoing transformation of housing neighborhoods.
1. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Lecture 13
Lecture-13
Equivalent Frame Method
By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali
Civil Engineering Department
NWFP UET Peshawar
drqaisarali@nwfpuet.edu.pk
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 5115 Advance Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures 1
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Topics Addressed
Introduction
Stiffness of Slab-Beam Member
Stiffness of Equivalent Column
Stiffness of Column
Stiffness of Torsional Member
Examples
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 2
1
2. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Topics Addressed
Moment Distribution Method
Arrangement of Live Loads
Critical Sections for Factored Moments
Moment Redistribution
Factored Moments in Column and Middle Strips
Summary
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 3
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (ACI 13.7)
Introduction
Consider a 3D structure shown in figure. It is intended to transform this 3D
system into 2D system for facilitating analysis. This can be done by using
the transformation technique of Equivalent Frame Analysis (ACI 13.7).
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 4
2
3. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (ACI 13.7)
Introduction
First, a frame is detached from the 3D structure. In the given figure, an
interior frame is detached.
The width of the frame is same as mentioned in DDM. The length of the
frame extends up to full length of 3D system and the frame extends the full
height of the building.
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 5
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Introduction
Interior 3D frame detached from 3D structure.
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 6
3
4. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Introduction
This 3D frame is converted to a 2D frame by taking effect of stiffness of
laterally present members (slabs and beams).
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 7
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Introduction
This 3D frame is converted to a 2D frame by taking effect of stiffness of
laterally present members (slabs and beams).
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 8
4
5. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Introduction
This 3D frame is converted to a 2D frame by taking effect of stiffness of
laterally present members (slabs and beams).
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 9
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Introduction
Ksb represents the combined stiffness of slab and longitudinal beam (if any).
Kec represents the modified column stiffness. The modification depends on lateral
members (slab, beams etc) and presence of column in the storey above.
Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb
Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec
Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb
Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec
Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb
Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec
Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb
Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 10
5
6. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Introduction
Therefore, the effect of 3D behavior of a frame is transformed into a 2D frame in terms of
these stiffness i.e., Ksb and Kec.
Once a 2D frame is obtained, the analysis can be done by any method of 2D frame analysis.
Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb
Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec
Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb
Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec
Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb
Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec
Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb
Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 11
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Introduction
Next the procedures for determination of Ksb and Kec are presented.
Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb
Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec
Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb
Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec
Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb
Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec
Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb
Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec Kec
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 12
6
7. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Stiffness of Slab Beam member (Ksb):
( )
The stiffness of slab beam (Ksb = kEIsb/l) consists of combined stiffness of
slab and any longitudinal beam present within.
For a span, the k factor is a direct function of ratios c1/l1 and c2/l2
Tables are available in literature (Nilson and MacGregor) for determination
of k for various conditions of slab systems.
c1
l2 c2
l1
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 13
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Stiffness of Slab Beam member (Ksb):
( )
Determination of k
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 14
7
8. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Stiffness of Slab Beam member (Ksb):
( )
Isb determination
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 15
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Stiffness of Slab Beam member (Ksb): Values of k for usual
( )
cases of structural systems.
Column l1 l2 c1/l1 c2/l1 k
dimension
12 × 12 10 10 0.10 0.10 4.182 As evident from the
15 15 0.07 0.07 4.05 table, the value of k for
20 20 0.05 0.05 4.07 usual cases of structures
15 × 15 10 10 0.13 0.13 4.30 is 4.
15 15 0.08 0.08 4.06
20 20 0.06 0.06 4.04
18 × 18 10 10 0.15 0.15 4.403
15 15 0.10 0.10 4.182
20 20 0.08 0.08 4.06
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 16
8
9. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Stiffness of Equivalent Column (Kec):
q ( )
Stiffness of equivalent column consists of stiffness of actual columns
{above (if any) and below slab-beam} plus stiffness of torsional members.
Mathematically,
nKc × mKt
1/Kec = 1/nKc + 1/mKt OR Kec =
nKc + mKt
Where,
n = 2 for interior storey (for flat plates only)
= 1 for top storey (for flat plates only)
m = 1 for exterior frames (half frame)
= 2 for interior frames (full frame)
Note: n will be replaced by ∑ for columns having different stiffness
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 17
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Stiffness of Column (Kc):
( )
General formula of flexural stiffness is given by K = kEI/l
Design aids are available from which value of k can be readily obtained for
different values of (ta/tb) and (lu/lc).
These design aids can be used if moment distribution method is used as
method of analysis.
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 18
9
10. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Stiffness of Column (Kc):
( )
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 19
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Stiffness of Column (Kc):
( )
Determination of k
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 20
10
11. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Stiffness of Column (Kc):
( )
Determination of k: Values of k for usual cases of structural
systems.
ta tb ta/tb lc lu lc/lu k
As evident from the
table, the value of k for
3 3 1.00 10 9.5 1.05 4.52
usual cases of structures
4 3 1.33 10 9.4
94 1.06 4.56
is 5.5.
5 3 1.67 10 9.3 1.07 4.60
6 3 2.00 10 9.3 1.08 5.20
7 3 2.33 10 9.2 1.09 5.39
8 3 2.67 10 9.1 1.10 5.42
9 3 3.00 10 9.0 1.11 5.46
10 3 3.33 10 8.9 1.12 5.5
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 21
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Stiffness of Torsional Member (Kt):
( )
Torsional members (transverse members) provide moment transfer
between the slab-beams and the columns.
Assumed to have constant cross-section throughout their length.
Two conditions of torsional members (given next).
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 22
11
12. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Stiffness of Torsional Member (Kt):
( )
Condition (a) – No transverse beams framing into columns
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 23
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Stiffness of Torsional member (Kt):
( )
Condition (b) – Transverse beams framing into columns
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 24
12
13. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Stiffness of Torsional member (Kt):
( )
Stiffness Determination: The torsional stiffness Kt of the torsional member is
given as:
If beams frame into the support in the direction of analysis the torsional
analysis,
stiffness Kt needs to be increased.
Ecs = modulus of elasticity of slab concrete; Isb = I of slab with beam; Is = I of slab without beam
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 25
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Stiffness of Torsional member (Kt):
( )
Cross sectional constant, C:
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 26
13
14. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Equivalent Frame
q
Finally using the flexural stiffness values of the slab-beam
and equivalent columns, a 3D frame can be converted to 2D
frame.
Ksb Ksb Ksb
Kec Kec Kec Kec
Ksb Ksb Ksb
Kec Kec Kec Kec
Ksb Ksb Ksb
Kec Kec Kec Kec
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 27
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Example: Find the equivalent 2D frame for 1st storey of the E-W interior
frame of fl t plate structure shown b l
f f flat l t t t h below. Th slab i 10″ thi k and LL i
The l b is thick d is
144 psf so that ultimate load on slab is 0.3804 ksf. All columns are 14″
square. Take fc′ = 4 ksi and fy = 60 ksi. Storey height = 10′ (from floor
top to slab top)
Data:
l1 = 25′ (ln = 23.83′)
l2 = 20′
Column strip width = 20/4 = 5′
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 28
14
15. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 01: 3D frame selection.
20′
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 29
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 01: 3D frame extraction.
20′
10′
10′
25′
25′
10′
25′
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 25′ 30
15
16. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 02: Extraction of single storey from 3D frame for separate analysis.
20′
25′
25′
10′
25′
25′
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 31
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 03a: Slab-beam Stiffness calculation.
Table: Slab beam stiffness (Ksb).
l1 and l2 and k
Spa
Span c1/l1 c2/l2 I =l h 3/12
l / Ksb=kEIs/l
c1 c2 ( bl A-20) s 2 f
(table A 20)
25' & 20' and
A2-B2 0.05 0.06 4.047 20000 270E
14" 14"
The remaining spans will have the same values as the geometry is same.
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 32
16
17. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 33
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 03b: Equivalent column stiffness calculation
(1/Kec = 1/∑Kc +1/Kt)
Calculation of torsional member stiffness (Kt)
Table: Kt calculation.
Column
l2 c2 C = ∑ (1 – 0 63x/y)x3y/3 (i 4)
0.63x/y)x (in Kt = ∑ 9EcsC/ {l2(1 – c2/l2)3}
location
A2 20′ 14" {1 – 0.63 × 10/ 14} × 103 × 14/3 = 2567 2 × [9Ecs×2567/ {20×12 (1–14/ (20×12))3}]=231Ecs
Note 01: Kt term is multiplied with 2 because two similar torsional members meet at column A2.
Note 02: Kt values for all other columns will be same as A2 because of similar column
dimensions.
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 34
17
18. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM): A
lu
Solution:
B
Step 03b: Equivalent column stiffness calculation
(1/Kec = 1/∑Kc +1/Kt)
Calculation of column stiffness (Kc)
Table: ∑Kc calculation.
kAB CAB
Ic (in4)
Column (from (from
lc lu = (lc – hf) lc / lu for 14″ × 14″ ta/tb ΣKc = 2 × kEIc/lc
location table table
column
A23) A23)
10′ 120/110 = 14 × 143/12 = 2×(5.09Ecc×3201/ 120)
A2 110″ 5/5 = 1 5.09 0.57
(120″) 1.10 3201 = 272Ecc
Note: For flat plates, ∑Kc term is multiplied with 2 for interior storey with similar columns
above and below. For top storey, the ∑Kc term will be a single value (multiplied by 1)
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 35
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 36
18
19. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 03b: Equivalent column stiffness calculation
(1/Kec = 1/∑Kc +1/Kt)
Calculation of column stiffness (Kc)
Equivalent column stiffness calculation (1/Kec = 1/∑Kc +1/Kt)
1/Kec = 1/∑Kc +1/Kt = 1/272Ecc + 1/231Ecs
Because the slab and the columns have the same strength
concrete, Ecc = Ecs = Ec.
Therefore, Kec = 124.91Ec
As all columns have similar dimensions and geometric
conditions, the Kec value for all columns will be 124.91Ec
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 37
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 04: Equivalent Frame; can be analyzed using any method of analysis
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 38
19
20. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 04: To analyze the frame in SAP, the stiffness values are multiplied by
lengths.
Ksblsb = 270×25×12=81000E
Keclec = 124.91×10×12=14989E
10′
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 39
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Load on frame:
Solution: As the horizontal frame element
Step 04: SAP results (moment at center). represents slab beam, load is
computed by multiplying slab load
with width of frame
wul2 = 0.3804 × 20 = 7.608 kip/ft
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 40
20
21. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 04: SAP results (moment at center).
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 41
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 04: SAP results (moment at faces).
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 42
21
22. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 04: Comparison with SAP 3D model results.
Load on model = 144 psf (LL)
Slab thickness = 10″
Columns = 14″× 14″
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 43
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 04: Comparison of SAP 3D model with EFM.
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 44
22
23. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Example: Find the equivalent 2D frame for 1st storey of the E-W interior
frame of b
f f beam supported f
t d frame structure shown b l
t t h below. Th slab i 7″
The l b is
thick with LL of 144 psf so that ultimate load on slab is 0.336 ksf. All
columns are 14″ square. Take fc′ = 4 ksi and fy = 60 ksi. Storey height =
10′ (from floor top to slab top)
Data:
l1 = 25′ (ln = 23.83′)
l2 = 20′
Column strip width = 20/4 = 5′
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 45
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 01: 3D frame selection.
20′
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 46
23
24. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 01: 3D frame extraction.
20′
10′
10′
25′
25′
10′
25′
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 25′ 47
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 02: Extraction of single storey from 3D frame for separate analysis.
20′
25′
25′
10′
25′
25′
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 48
24
25. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 03a: Slab-beam Stiffness calculation.
Table: Slab beam stiffness (Ksb).
l1 and l2 and k
Span c1/l1 c2/l2 Isb Ksb=kEIs/l1
c1 c2 (table A 20)
A-20)
25' & 20' and
A2-B2 0.0467 0.058 4.051 25844 349E
14" 14"
The remaining spans will have the same values as the geometry is same.
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 49
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 03b: Equivalent column stiffness calculation
(1/Kec = 1/∑Kc +1/Kt)
Calculation of torsional member stiffness (Kt)
Table: Kt calculation.
Column
l2 c2 C = ∑ (1 – 0 63x/y)x3y/3 (i 4)
0.63x/y)x (in Kt = ∑ 9EcsC/ {l2(1 – c2/l2)3}
location
A2 20′ 14" 11208 3792.63Ecs
B2 20′ 14" 12694 4295.98Ecs
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 50
25
26. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM): A
lu
Solution:
B
Step 03b: Equivalent column stiffness calculation
(1/Kec = 1/∑Kc +1/Kt)
Calculation of column stiffness (Kc)
Table: ∑Kc calculation.
Ic (in4)
kAB (from
Column location lc lu lc / lu for 14″ × 14″
14 14 ta/tb Kc
table A23)
column
10′ 120/100 = 14 × 143/12 = 16.5/3.5 =
A2 (bottom) 100″ 7.57 201.9Ecc
(120″) 1.20 3201 4.71
10′ 120/100 = 14 × 143/12 = 3.5/16.5=
A2 (top) 100″ 5.3 141.39Ecc
(120″) 1.20 3201 0.21
∑Kc = 202Ecc + 141Ecc = 343Ecc
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 51
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM): A
lu
Solution:
B
Step 03b: Equivalent column stiffness calculation
(1/Kec = 1/∑Kc +1/Kt)
Calculation of column stiffness (Kc)
Table: ∑Kc calculation.
Ic (in4)
kAB (from
Column location lc lu lc / lu for 14″ × 14″
14 14 ta/tb Kc
table A23)
column
10′ 120/100 = 14 × 143/12 = 16.5/3.5 =
B2 (bottom) 100″ 7.57 201.9Ecc
(120″) 1.20 3201 4.71
10′ 120/100 = 14 × 143/12 = 3.5/16.5=
B2 (top) 100″ 5.3 141.39Ecc
(120″) 1.20 3201 0.21
∑Kc = 202Ecc + 141Ecc = 343Ecc
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 52
26
27. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 03b: Equivalent column stiffness calculation (Column A2)
(1/Kec = 1/∑Kc +1/Kt)
Calculation of column stiffness (Kc)
Equivalent column stiffness calculation (1/Kec = 1/∑Kc +1/Kt)
1/Kec = 1/∑Kc +1/Kt = 1/343Ecc + 1/3792.63Ecs
Because the slab and the columns have the same strength
concrete, Ecc = Ecs = Ec.
Therefore, Kec = 315Ec
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 53
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 03b: Equivalent column stiffness calculation (Column B2)
(1/Kec = 1/∑Kc +1/Kt)
Calculation of column stiffness (Kc)
Equivalent column stiffness calculation (1/Kec = 1/∑Kc +1/Kt)
1/Kec = 1/∑Kc +1/Kt = 1/343Ecc + 1/4295.98Ecs
Because the slab and the columns have the same strength
concrete, Ecc = Ecs = Ec.
Therefore, Kec = 318Ec
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 54
27
28. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 04: Equivalent Frame; can be analyzed using any method of analysis
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 55
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 04: To analyze the frame in SAP, the stiffness values are multiplied by
lengths. Ksblsb = 349×25×12=104700E
Keclec = 315×10×12=37800E
Keclec = 318×10×12=38160E
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 56
28
29. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Load on frame:
Solution: As the horizontal frame element
Step 04: SAP results (moment at center). represents slab beam, load is
computed by multiplying slab load
with width of frame
wul2 = 0.336 × 20 = 6.72 kip/ft
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 57
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 04: SAP results (moment at center).
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 58
29
30. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 04: SAP results (moment at faces).
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 59
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 04: Comparison with SAP 3D model results.
Load on model = 144 psf (LL)
Slab thickness = 7″
Columns = 14″× 14″
Beams = 14″× 20″
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 60
30
31. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 04: Comparison of beam moments of SAP 3D model with beam
moments of EFM by SAP 2D analysis.
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 61
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Moment Distribution Method:
The original derivation of EFM assumed that moment distribution would be
the procedure used to analyze the slabs, and some of the concepts in the
method are awkward to adapt to other methods of analysis.
In lieu of computer software, moment distribution is a convenient hand
calculation method for analyzing partial frames in the Equivalent Frame
Method.
Once stiffnesses are obtained from EFM, the distribution factors are
conveniently calculated.
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 62
31
32. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Moment Distribution Method:
Distribution Factors:
Kct
Ksb1
1 Kt
2 Ksb2 lc
l1 Kt
Kec
l1 3
Kcb
K = kEI/l lc
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 63
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Moment Distribution Method:
Distribution Factors:
Slab Beam Distribution Factors:
Ksb1
DF (span 2-1) =
Ksb1 + Ksb2 + Kec
Ksb2
DF (span 2-3) =
Ksb1 + Ksb2 + Kec
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 64
32
33. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Moment Distribution Method:
Distribution Factors:
Equivalent Column Distribution factors:
Kec
DF =
Ksb1 + Ksb2 + Kec
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 65
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Moment Distribution Method:
Distribution Factors:
These distribution factors are used in analysis.
The equivalent frame of example 02 shall now be analyzed using
moment distribution method.
The comparison with SAP 3D model result for beam moments is also
done.
done
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 66
33
34. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 04: Comparison of SAP 3D model with EFM done by Moment
distribution method.
Joint A B C D E
CarryOver 0.5034 0.5034 0.5034 0.5034
DF 0.000 0.301 0.699 0.412 0.177 0.412 0.412 0.177 0.412 0.412 0.177 0.412 0.699 0.301 0.000
Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab
FEM 0.000 0.000 399.103 ‐399.103 0.000 399.103 ‐399.103 0.000 399.103 ‐399.103 0.000 399.103 ‐399.103 0.000 0.000
Bal 0.000 ‐119.955 ‐279.148 0.000
119.955 279.148 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 279.148 119.955 0.000
Carry over 0.000 ‐140.529 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 140.529 0.000
Bal 0.000 0.000 0.000 57.838 24.854 57.838 0.000 0.000 0.000 ‐57.838 ‐24.854 ‐57.838 0.000 0.000 0.000
Carry over 29.117 0.000 0.000 29.117 ‐29.117 0.000 0.000 ‐29.117
Bal 0.000 ‐8.751 ‐20.365 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 20.365 8.751 0.000
Carry over 0.000 ‐10.252 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 10.252 0.000
Bal 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.220 1.813 4.220 0.000 0.000 0.000 ‐4.220 ‐1.813 ‐4.220 0.000 0.000 0.000
Total 0.000‐129.395 129.395 ‐488.302 26.810 461.492‐367.695 0.000 367.695‐461.492‐26.810488.302‐129.395129.395 0.000
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 67
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 04: Comparison of SAP 3D model with EFM.
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 68
34
35. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution of example 02 by Moment Distribution Method:
p y
Step 04: Analysis using Moment distribution method.
Joint A B C D E
CarryOver 0.5034 0.5034 0.5034 0.5034
DF 0.000 0.474 0.526 0.344 0.313 0.344 0.344 0.313 0.344 0.344 0.313 0.344 0.526 0.474 0.000
Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab
FEM 0.000 0.000 351.891 ‐351.891 0.000 351.891‐351.891 0.000 351.891‐351.891 0.000 351.891‐351.891 0.000 0.000
Bal 0.00 ‐166.90 ‐185.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 166.90 0.00
Carry over 0.00 ‐93.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 93.13 0.00
Bal 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.99 29.15 31.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 ‐31.99 ‐29.15 ‐31.99 0.00 0.00 0.00
Carry over 16.11 0.00 0.00 16.11 ‐16.11 0.00 0.00 ‐16.11
Bal 0.00 ‐7.64 ‐8.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.47 7.64 0.00
Carry over 0.00 ‐4.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.26 0.00
Bal 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.46 1.33 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 ‐1.46 ‐1.33 ‐1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0. ‐174.900 174.900 ‐415.961 30.544 385.417‐335.012 0.000 335.012‐385.417‐30.544415.961‐174.900174.900 0.000
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 69
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM):
Solution:
Step 04: Comparison of beam moments of SAP 3D model with EFM analysis
results obtained by moment distribution method.
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 70
35
36. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Arrangement of Live loads (ACI 13.7.6):
g ( )
When LL ≤ 0.75DL
Maximum factored moment when Full factored LL on all spans
Other cases
Pattern live loading using 0.75(Factored LL) to determine maximum
factored moment
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 71
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 72
36
37. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Critical section for factored moments (ACI 13.7.7):
( )
Interior supports
Critical section at face of rectilinear support but ≤ 0.175l1 from center of
the support
Exterior supports
At exterior supports with brackets or capitals, the critical section < ½ the
pp p ,
projection of bracket or capital beyond face of supporting element.
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 73
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 74
37
38. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Moment Redistribution (ACI 13.7.7.4):
( )
Mu2
Mu1
Mo
Mu3
ln
c1/2 c1/2
l1
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 75
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Factored moments in column strips and middle strips:
p p
Same as in the Direct Design Method
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 76
38
39. Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Two Way Slab
Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
Summary of Steps required for analysis using EFM
y p q y g
Extract the 3D frame from the 3D structure.
Extract a storey from 3D frame for gravity load analysis.
Identify EF members i.e., slab beam, torsional member and columns.
Find stiffness (kEI/l) of each EF member using tables.
Assign stiffnesses of each EF member to its corresponding 2D frame member.
Analyze the obtained 2D frame using any method of analysis to get longitudinal moments
based on center to center span.
Distribute slab-beam longitudinal moment laterally using lateral distribution procedures of
DDM.
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 77
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
The End
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 78
39