This document provides an overview of different seismic analysis methods for reinforced concrete buildings according to Indian code IS 1893-2002, including linear static, nonlinear static, linear dynamic, and nonlinear dynamic analysis. It describes the basic procedures for each analysis type and provides examples of how to calculate design seismic base shear, distribute seismic forces vertically and horizontally, and determine drift and overturning effects. Case studies are presented comparing the results of static and dynamic analysis for regular and irregular multi-storey buildings modeled in SAP2000.
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY
DERIVATION OF EQUATION TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY FACTORS
Download vedio link
https://youtu.be/imy61hU0_yo
Seismic Analysis of regular & Irregular RCC frame structures
This document discusses seismic analysis of regular and irregular reinforced concrete framed buildings. It analyzes 4 building models - a regular 4-story building, a stiffness irregular building with a soft ground story, and two vertically irregular buildings with setbacks on the 3rd floor and 2nd/3rd floors. Static analysis was performed to compare bending moments, shear forces, story drifts, and joint displacements. Results showed irregular buildings experienced higher seismic demands. The regular building performed best, with the single setback building also performing well. Irregular configurations increase seismic effects and should be minimized in design.
This document provides definitions and explanations of key concepts in reinforced concrete design. It defines reinforced concrete as a composite material made of concrete and steel reinforcement. The purpose of reinforcement is to improve the tensile strength of concrete. The Limit State Method of design considers both the strength limit state and serviceability limit state, making it a more realistic and economical approach compared to other methods like Working Stress Method and Ultimate Load Method. Key factors of safety in the Limit State Method include partial factors for concrete γc = 1.5, and for steel γs = 1.15.
This document provides an overview of a project report on designing a multi-storied reinforced concrete building using ETABS software. The objectives are to analyze, design, and detail the structural components of the building. The methodology involves preparing CAD drawings, calculating loads, analyzing the structure, and designing and detailing structural elements. The building to be designed is a residential building with ground + 5 floors located in Chalikkavattom. Loads like dead, live, wind, and seismic loads will be calculated according to Indian codes and applied in the ETABS analysis model.
This document provides an overview of slope stability and analysis. It defines different types of slopes as natural, man-made, infinite and finite. Common causes of slope failure like erosion, seepage, drawdown, rainfall, earthquakes and external loading are described. Key terms used in slope stability are defined, including slip zone, slip plane, sliding mass and slope angle. Types of slope failures are identified as face/slope failure, toe failure and base failure. Methods for analyzing finite slope stability, like Swedish circle method, Bishop's simplified method and Taylor's stability number are introduced. Infinite slope analysis is described for cohesionless, cohesive and cohesive-frictional soils. Example tutorial problems on slope stability calculations are
Structural Analysis And Design is a structural analysis and design software. It includes tools for 3D modeling, analysis, and design of structures according to various international codes. The software was originally developed by Research Engineers International and later acquired by Bentley Systems. It allows engineers to generate models using different elements like frames, plates, and solids. Various types of structures like trusses, planes, and spaces can be modeled and analyzed. The software provides tools for assigning properties, loads, boundary conditions, and performing analysis to calculate member forces and deflections. The results can then be used for structural design of elements like beams, columns, slabs, and foundations.
This document discusses reinforced concrete columns. It begins by defining columns and different column types, including based on shape, reinforcement, loading conditions, and slenderness ratio. Short columns fail due to material strength while slender columns are at risk of buckling. The document covers column design considerations like unsupported length and effective length. It provides examples of single storey building column design and discusses minimum longitudinal reinforcement requirements in columns.
This document discusses response spectra and design spectra. It begins by explaining how response spectra are developed by analyzing the response of single-degree-of-freedom systems to ground motion records and plotting the maximum response versus natural period. Design spectra are then developed as smooth versions of response spectra to account for uncertainties in natural period. The key differences between response and design spectra are also summarized.
Limit state, working stress, ultimate load method - Detailed Concept
Get PPT here
https://civilinsider.com/design-philosophies-of-rcc-structure/
www.civilinsider .com
www.civilinsider .com
www.civilinsider .com
www.civilinsider .com
Various design philosophies have been invented in the different parts of the world to design RCC structures. In 1900 theory by Coignet and Tedesco was accepted and codified as Working Stress Method. The Working Stress Method was in use for several years until the revision of IS 456 in 2000.
What are the Various Design Philosophies?
Working Stress Method
limit state method
ultimate load method
#civil insider
information on types of beams, different methods to calculate beam stress, design for shear, analysis for SRB flexure, design for flexure, Design procedure for doubly reinforced beam,
This document discusses counterfort retaining walls. It defines a retaining wall and lists common types, focusing on counterfort retaining walls. It describes the components and mechanics of counterfort walls, noting they are more economical than cantilever walls for heights over 6 meters. The document also covers forces acting on retaining walls, methods for calculating active and passive earth pressures, and stability conditions walls must satisfy including factors of safety against overturning and sliding and limiting maximum pressure at the base.
This document summarizes the procedures for conducting a pile load test to determine the load carrying capacity of a pile. The test involves installing a test pile between two anchor piles and applying incremental loads through a hydraulic jack while monitoring settlement. Loads are applied until the pile reaches twice its safe load or a specified settlement. A load-settlement curve is plotted to determine the ultimate load and safe load based on settlement criteria. The test provides values for maximum load, permissible working load, and pile settlement under different loads.
This document provides an analysis and design of a G+3 residential building. It includes details of the building such as dimensions, material properties, and load calculations. An equivalent static analysis is performed to calculate the seismic lateral loads at each floor level. The results of the structural analysis including bending moment and shear force diagrams are presented. Slab, beam, column and footing designs are to be covered in the thesis work according to the scope.
This document provides an overview of the design of compression members (columns) in reinforced concrete structures. It discusses various types of columns based on reinforcement, loading conditions, and slenderness ratio. It describes the classification of columns as short or slender. The document also covers effective length, braced vs unbraced columns, codal provisions for reinforcement, and functions of longitudinal and transverse reinforcement. Key points include types of column reinforcement, minimum reinforcement requirements, cover requirements, and assumptions for the limit state of collapse under compression.
This document provides design aids for reinforced concrete structures based on Indian Standard IS: 456-1978 Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete.
The design aids cover material strength and stress-strain relationships, flexural members, compression members, shear and torsion, development length and anchorage, working stress design, deflection calculation, and general tables. Charts and tables are provided for preliminary and final design of beams, slabs, and columns. Assumptions made in developing the design aids are explained. An example illustrates the use of the design aids. Important points regarding the use and limitations of the charts and tables are noted.
The design aids were prepared based on examination of international handbooks and consultation with Indian
The document discusses the design of footings for structures. It begins by explaining that footings are needed to transfer structural loads from members made of materials like steel and concrete to the underlying soil. It then describes different types of shallow and deep foundations, including spread, strap, combined, and raft footings. The document provides details on designing isolated and combined footings to resist vertical loads and moments based on provisions in IS 456. It also discusses wall footings and combined footings that support multiple columns. In summary, the document covers the purpose of footings, various footing types, and design of isolated and combined footings.
Approximate analysis methods make simplifying assumptions to determine preliminary member forces and dimensions for indeterminate structures. Case 1 assumes diagonals cannot carry compression and shares shear between diagonals. Case 2 allows compression in diagonals. Portal and cantilever methods analyze frames by dividing into substructures at assumed hinge locations, solving each sequentially from top to bottom.
This document discusses different methods for seismic analysis of reinforced concrete buildings, including linear static, nonlinear static, linear dynamic, and nonlinear dynamic analysis. It provides details on each analysis method, including the steps involved. It also presents a case study that compares the results of static and dynamic analysis methods on regular and irregular multi-storey buildings, finding that dynamic analysis more accurately predicts structural response.
This document discusses different methods for seismic analysis of reinforced concrete buildings, including linear static, nonlinear static, linear dynamic, and nonlinear dynamic analysis. It provides details on each analysis method and outlines the general procedures. It also presents a case study that compares the results of equivalent static, response spectrum, and time history analysis of regular and irregular multi-storey buildings to determine storey displacements and seismic behavior.
Sesmic strengthening and evalution of multi storey building with soft storey ...
This document discusses seismic strengthening of multi-storey buildings with soft storeys. It defines local and global damage indices, with interstorey drift ratio (IDR) identified as an easy way to find the damage index. Analytical approaches like pushover analysis and time history analysis are evaluated. Experimental problems analyze buildings with varying soft storey heights subjected to earthquakes, comparing damage indices among storeys. The conclusion is that damage index increases with more storeys and higher soft storeys, and can exceed 1 based on IDR. Pushover analysis provides capacity while time history gives maximum IDR under seismic loads.
Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Structure Subjected To Different (1).pptx
This document summarizes a presentation on analyzing the seismic behavior of multi-story buildings with varying heights using ETABS software. It analyzes buildings with 5, 6, 7, and 8 stories under seismic, dead, and live loads. The objectives are to check the seismic response of buildings using ETABS, analyze forces, moments, stresses, strains, and deformations, and analyze story drift, displacement, shear, stiffness, period, and frequency on different floors. The methodology involves modeling the buildings in ETABS and subjecting them to static and dynamic analysis to determine responses like base shear, maximum displacement, tensile forces, and moments and shear forces.
Seismic analysis of reinforced concrete buildings -A Review
This document discusses different methods for analyzing reinforced concrete buildings under seismic loads, including linear static, nonlinear static, linear dynamic, and nonlinear dynamic analysis. Linear static analysis (equivalent static analysis) distributes seismic forces along the height of the building based on its mass and fundamental period, while nonlinear static (pushover) analysis applies monotonically increasing lateral loads until a target displacement is reached. Linear dynamic analysis uses modal response spectrum analysis to determine seismic forces based on the building's vibration modes and acceleration response spectrum. Nonlinear dynamic analysis uses time-history analysis to model the structure's exact nonlinear response over time under recorded earthquake ground motions.
Dynamic Response of High Rise Structures Under The Influence of Shear Walls
This study presents the procedure for seismic performance estimation of high-rise buildings based on a concept of the capacity spectrum method. In 3D analytical model of thirty storied buildings have been generated for symmetric buildings Models and analyzed using structural analysis tool ETABS. The analytical model of the building includes all important components that influence the mass, strength, stiffness and deformability of the structure. To study the effect of concrete core wall & shear wall at different positions during earthquake, seismic analysis using both linear static, linear dynamic and non-linear static procedure has been performed. The deflections at each storey level has been compared by performing Equivalent static, response spectrum method as well as pushover method has also been performed to determine capacity, demand and performance level of the considered building models. From the below studies it has been observed that non-linear pushover analysis provide good estimate of global as well as local inelastic deformation demands and also reveals design weakness that may remain hidden in an elastic analysis and also the performance level of the structure. Storey drifts are found within the limit as specified by code (IS: 1893-2002) in Equivalent static, linear dynamic & non-linear static analysis.
This document provides an overview of earthquake resistant design of structures. It discusses key topics like seismology, seismic zonation maps, and various methods of earthquake analysis for structural design purposes. These include equivalent static analysis, nonlinear static (pushover) analysis, response spectrum dynamic analysis, and time history dynamic analysis. Load combinations for accounting for multi-directional ground shaking are also addressed. The document serves as a reference for understanding earthquake effects on structures and performing appropriate seismic analyses.
Investigation on performance based non linear pushover analysis of flat plate...
This document summarizes an investigation into the performance of flat plate reinforced concrete buildings under nonlinear pushover analysis. The study evaluates bare frame structures with different percentages of masonry infill, as well as structures with soft stories or shear walls. Pushover analysis was performed on a 7-story model building to determine base shear, displacement, story drift, and hinge formation at different performance levels. Results show that infill and shear walls improve seismic performance by reducing displacement, and that placing soft stories higher in the structure increases strength and stability. Shear walls performed best and controlled hinge formation, indicating more uniform response.
Seismic Vulnerability of RC Building With and Without Soft Storey Effect Usi...
A soft storey is one which has less resistance to earthquake forces than the other storeys;
Buildings containing soft stories are extremely vulnerable to earthquake collapses, since one floor is
flexible compared to others. Vulnerability of buildings is important in causing risk to life hence special
consideration is necessary for such soft storey RC buildings. In the present study, analytical
investigation of a RC building by considering the effect of soft storey situated in seismic Zone-V of
India, in accordance with IS 1893-2002 (part-1), is taken as an example and the various analytical
approaches (linear static and nonlinear static analysis) are performed on the building to identify the
seismic demand and also pushover analysis is performed to determine the performance levels, and
Capacity spectrum of the considered, also Storey Shear is compared for 3 models by using Finite
Element Software Package ETAB’s 9.7.4 version.
Seismic performance of r c buildings on sloping grounds with different types ...
Abstract
Structure are highly susceptible to serve damages in earthquake scenario, so choosing an appropriate lateral force resisting
bracing systems will have a significant effect on performance of the structure. So this present study is aimed at evaluating and
comparing various types of eccentric steel bracings for 12 storey RC frame building resisting on sloping ground configurations.
For this 5 types of bracing systems like X-Bracing, Diagonal bracing, K- bracing, V-bracing and inverted V bracing are
considered on the outer periphery of the buildings with step back and set back – step back type configurations are modeled and
analyzed. The models are compared for different aspects within the structure, such as the maximum storey displacement, base
shear, storey drift and storey shear, the structure is analyzed for seismic zone V and medium soil condition as per IS 1893:2002
using ETABS software. Results conclude that on sloping ground due to irregularity on ground surface, the structures are more
vulnerable to earthquakes. Hence use of eccentric steel bracing is an effective and economical way to resist earthquake forces,
Inverted V type bracing performs well compared to other bracing types. By using inverted V type bracing in step back buildings
types maximum storey displacement of 70% and storey drift of 66% are obtained. Similarly for setback – step back configuration
maximum storey displacement of 74% and storey drift of 70% are obtained respectively.
Keywords: X-Bracing, Diagonal Bracing, K- Bracing, V-Bracing and Inverted V Bracing
This document discusses earthquake analysis and earthquake resistant design concepts. It begins with terminology related to earthquakes and seismic analysis. It then discusses the basic concepts of earthquake resistant design including structural simplicity, uniformity and symmetry. It also covers equivalent static analysis and calculating the seismic design base shear. The document discusses seismic zone coefficients, structural importance factors, response reduction factors, and seismic design categories. It concludes with discussions of site classification, soil factors, time periods, and determining lateral force coefficients and building masses.
Capacity Spectrum Method for RC Building with Cracked and Uncracked Section
one of the most widespread procedures for the assessment of building behavior, due to earthquake, is the Capacity Spectrum Method (CSM). In the scope of this procedure, capacity of the structure compares with the demands of earthquake ground motion on the structure. The capacity of the structure is represented by a nonlinear force-displacement curve, referred to as a pushover curve. The base shear forces and roof displacements are converted to equivalent spectral accelerations and spectral displacements, respectively, by means of coefficients that represent effective modal masses and modal participation factors. These spectral values define the capacity spectrum. The demands of the earthquake ground motion are represented by response spectra. A graphical construction that includes both capacity and demand spectra, results in an intersection of the two curves that estimates the performance of the structure to the earthquake. In this study, for determination of the performance levels, G+10 R.C.C. Building with cracked and uncracked section were taken. The structural Capacity of cracked and uncracked section compared with performance point value, which shows the structural capacity of building having cracked section is lesser than the uncracked section. Different modeling issues were analyzed to study the effect on Capacity of the structure with cracked and uncracked section for different position of Shear wall.
Static and Dynamic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Framed Building: A Compara...
Reinforced concrete frame buildings are most common type of construction in urban India, which is subjected to several types of forces during their life time such as static forces and dynamic forces due to wind and earthquakes. The static loads are constant with time, while dynamic loads are time varying, causing considerable inertia effects .It depends mainly on location of building, importance of its use and size of the building. Its consideration in analysis makes the solution more complicated and time consuming and its negligence may sometimes becomes the cause of disaster during earthquake.
So it is growing interest in the process of designing civil engineering structures capable to withstand dynamic loads . The behavior of building under dynamic forces depends upon its mass and stiffness properties, whereas the static behavior is solely dependent upon the stiffness characteristics.
Pushover analysis was performed on a 12-story building model designed for seismic zones 3 and 5 in India. The analysis assessed damage at different performance levels from immediate occupancy to collapse. For the zone 3 design, yielding initially occurred in beams and then columns. The structure remained within collapse prevention limits, indicating ductile behavior. Similarly, the zone 5 design remained ductile with initial yielding in beams and columns. The structures designed using linear analysis for both seismic zones were found to perform well under pushover analysis and experience damage within acceptable limits.
Pushover is a static-nonlinear analysis method where a structure is subjected to gravity loading and a monotonic displacement-controlled lateral load pattern which continuously increases through elastic and inelastic behavior until an ultimate condition is reached. Lateral load may represent the range of base shear induced by earthquake loading, and its configuration may be proportional to the distribution of mass along building height, mode shapes, or another practical means.
The static pushover analysis is becoming a popular tool for seismic performance evaluation of existing and new structures. The expectation is that the pushover analysis will provide adequate information on seismic demands imposed by the design ground motion on the structural system and its components. The purpose of the paper is to summarize the basic concepts on which the pushover analysis can be based, assess the accuracy of pushover predictions, identify conditions under which the pushover will provide adequate information and, perhaps more importantly, identify cases in which the pushover predictions will be inadequate or even misleading.
Non-Linear Static (Pushover) Analysis of Irregular Building Systems
This document discusses the non-linear static (pushover) analysis of irregular building systems. It presents 6 building models of 13-story reinforced concrete buildings with different configurations of masonry infill walls and concrete shear walls to study their seismic performance. Non-linear static pushover analysis is performed using ETABS software to obtain the capacity curves and evaluate the performance of each model under seismic loading. The results show that the inclusion of masonry infill walls and concrete shear walls affects the seismic response of the irregular buildings, and that some configurations perform better than others.
Strengthening of RC Framed Structure Using Energy Dissipation Devices
A large numbers of existing buildings in India are severely deficient against earthquake forces and
the number of such buildings is growing very rapidly. This paper presents a way of using energy dissipation
devices for seismic strengthening of a RC framed structure. The objective was to improve the seismic
performance of the building to resist the earthquake. The viscous dampers are used as an energy dissipation
device in the form of single, double, inverted V, V type of dampers with different percentages of damping such
as 10%, 20% and 30% to prevent building from collapse in a major earthquake and also to control the damage
during earthquake. The performance of the buildings is assessed as per the procedure prescribed in ATC-40
and FEMA 356.
This document summarizes a study that evaluated the seismic behavior of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings in Venezuela. Three models of a sample building were analyzed: the original building design, a resizing design, and a displacement-based design. Nonlinear static and dynamic analyses were performed using software. Results found the original design did not meet code drift limits and had lower ductility than the other designs. The study aims to improve seismic design procedures in Venezuela.
1. This document discusses performing a pushover analysis on a flat slab building using SAP2000 software to evaluate its seismic performance.
2. A pushover analysis applies increasing lateral loads to identify weak zones and determine the building's strength and deformation capacities.
3. The analysis revealed that retrofitting weak columns with jacketing and adding beams could significantly improve the building's lateral strength and stiffness to withstand seismic forces.
This document provides details of the structural analysis and design of a commercial and residential building using STAAD.Pro, AutoCAD, and STAAD.Foundation software. The building is located in Trivandrum, Kerala and consists of a basement, ground plus three floors. The document describes the site details, building plans, load calculations, modeling in STAAD.Pro, design of structural elements like beams, columns, foundation, and reinforcement details. Pile foundation is adopted based on the bore log details. The analysis helps gain knowledge of designing various components using structural analysis and design software.
This document discusses scheduling problems in complex, poorly structured projects. It notes that scheduling becomes difficult when costs and durations depend on other activities or resources are specialized. A practical approach is to have experienced managers review and modify schedules before implementation. For more complex projects, the best solution is an iterative "generate and test" process where schedules are generated, tested for feasibility and constraints, and improvements are identified to generate new alternatives to test. The number of possible schedules is enormous, so considerable insight is needed to generate reasonable alternatives efficiently. Interactive scheduling systems using graphical displays and easy modification of schedules can help evaluate alternatives rapidly.
Sulphate attack occurs when sulphates react with hardened cement paste, causing expansion and cracking of concrete. Soil sulphates do not severely damage concrete, but water sulphates can enter porous concrete and react with hydration products. This forms ettringite which increases in volume, disintegrating the concrete. Sulphate attack can be external from sulphates in groundwater penetrating concrete, or internal from sulphates in the original mix. Delayed ettringite formation is a type of internal sulphate attack where ettringite decomposes during curing then reforms, expanding and damaging the concrete.
This document discusses various types of earth moving equipment used in construction projects. It describes excavation equipment like power shovels, backhoes, draglines, and clamshell buckets used to excavate earth and load trucks. It also covers excavating and earth moving equipment like scrapers and bulldozers used to dig and transport materials over long distances. Finally, it summarizes earth compacting equipment like smooth drum rollers, sheepfoot rollers, and pneumatic tyred rollers used to compact excavated earth in embankments and prepare surfaces for construction.
Dampers are mechanical systems that dissipate earthquake energy by deforming or yielding. They absorb seismic energy, reducing forces on structures and controlling building oscillations. Common types include hydraulic dampers using fluid flow, electro-rheological fluid dampers using variable viscosity fluids, metallic dampers using hysteretic behavior of metals, steel dampers using frame deformation, and friction dampers using clamped friction surfaces. Shape memory alloys also dissipate energy through large strain recovery without damage. Dampers direct earthquake energy to dissipating devices within structures, transforming mechanical energy into heat.
This document discusses shear wall analysis and design. It defines shear walls as structural elements used in buildings to resist lateral forces through cantilever action. The document classifies different types of shear walls and discusses their behavior under seismic loading. It outlines the steps for designing shear walls, including reviewing layout, analyzing structural systems, determining design forces, and detailing reinforcement. The document emphasizes the importance of properly locating shear walls in a building to resist seismic loads and minimize torsional effects.
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY
DERIVATION OF EQUATION TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY FACTORS
Download vedio link
https://youtu.be/imy61hU0_yo
Seismic Analysis of regular & Irregular RCC frame structuresDaanish Zama
This document discusses seismic analysis of regular and irregular reinforced concrete framed buildings. It analyzes 4 building models - a regular 4-story building, a stiffness irregular building with a soft ground story, and two vertically irregular buildings with setbacks on the 3rd floor and 2nd/3rd floors. Static analysis was performed to compare bending moments, shear forces, story drifts, and joint displacements. Results showed irregular buildings experienced higher seismic demands. The regular building performed best, with the single setback building also performing well. Irregular configurations increase seismic effects and should be minimized in design.
This document provides definitions and explanations of key concepts in reinforced concrete design. It defines reinforced concrete as a composite material made of concrete and steel reinforcement. The purpose of reinforcement is to improve the tensile strength of concrete. The Limit State Method of design considers both the strength limit state and serviceability limit state, making it a more realistic and economical approach compared to other methods like Working Stress Method and Ultimate Load Method. Key factors of safety in the Limit State Method include partial factors for concrete γc = 1.5, and for steel γs = 1.15.
This document provides an overview of a project report on designing a multi-storied reinforced concrete building using ETABS software. The objectives are to analyze, design, and detail the structural components of the building. The methodology involves preparing CAD drawings, calculating loads, analyzing the structure, and designing and detailing structural elements. The building to be designed is a residential building with ground + 5 floors located in Chalikkavattom. Loads like dead, live, wind, and seismic loads will be calculated according to Indian codes and applied in the ETABS analysis model.
This document provides an overview of slope stability and analysis. It defines different types of slopes as natural, man-made, infinite and finite. Common causes of slope failure like erosion, seepage, drawdown, rainfall, earthquakes and external loading are described. Key terms used in slope stability are defined, including slip zone, slip plane, sliding mass and slope angle. Types of slope failures are identified as face/slope failure, toe failure and base failure. Methods for analyzing finite slope stability, like Swedish circle method, Bishop's simplified method and Taylor's stability number are introduced. Infinite slope analysis is described for cohesionless, cohesive and cohesive-frictional soils. Example tutorial problems on slope stability calculations are
Structural Analysis And Design is a structural analysis and design software. It includes tools for 3D modeling, analysis, and design of structures according to various international codes. The software was originally developed by Research Engineers International and later acquired by Bentley Systems. It allows engineers to generate models using different elements like frames, plates, and solids. Various types of structures like trusses, planes, and spaces can be modeled and analyzed. The software provides tools for assigning properties, loads, boundary conditions, and performing analysis to calculate member forces and deflections. The results can then be used for structural design of elements like beams, columns, slabs, and foundations.
This document discusses reinforced concrete columns. It begins by defining columns and different column types, including based on shape, reinforcement, loading conditions, and slenderness ratio. Short columns fail due to material strength while slender columns are at risk of buckling. The document covers column design considerations like unsupported length and effective length. It provides examples of single storey building column design and discusses minimum longitudinal reinforcement requirements in columns.
This document discusses response spectra and design spectra. It begins by explaining how response spectra are developed by analyzing the response of single-degree-of-freedom systems to ground motion records and plotting the maximum response versus natural period. Design spectra are then developed as smooth versions of response spectra to account for uncertainties in natural period. The key differences between response and design spectra are also summarized.
Get PPT here
https://civilinsider.com/design-philosophies-of-rcc-structure/
www.civilinsider .com
www.civilinsider .com
www.civilinsider .com
www.civilinsider .com
Various design philosophies have been invented in the different parts of the world to design RCC structures. In 1900 theory by Coignet and Tedesco was accepted and codified as Working Stress Method. The Working Stress Method was in use for several years until the revision of IS 456 in 2000.
What are the Various Design Philosophies?
Working Stress Method
limit state method
ultimate load method
#civil insider
information on types of beams, different methods to calculate beam stress, design for shear, analysis for SRB flexure, design for flexure, Design procedure for doubly reinforced beam,
This document discusses counterfort retaining walls. It defines a retaining wall and lists common types, focusing on counterfort retaining walls. It describes the components and mechanics of counterfort walls, noting they are more economical than cantilever walls for heights over 6 meters. The document also covers forces acting on retaining walls, methods for calculating active and passive earth pressures, and stability conditions walls must satisfy including factors of safety against overturning and sliding and limiting maximum pressure at the base.
This document summarizes the procedures for conducting a pile load test to determine the load carrying capacity of a pile. The test involves installing a test pile between two anchor piles and applying incremental loads through a hydraulic jack while monitoring settlement. Loads are applied until the pile reaches twice its safe load or a specified settlement. A load-settlement curve is plotted to determine the ultimate load and safe load based on settlement criteria. The test provides values for maximum load, permissible working load, and pile settlement under different loads.
This document provides an analysis and design of a G+3 residential building. It includes details of the building such as dimensions, material properties, and load calculations. An equivalent static analysis is performed to calculate the seismic lateral loads at each floor level. The results of the structural analysis including bending moment and shear force diagrams are presented. Slab, beam, column and footing designs are to be covered in the thesis work according to the scope.
This document provides an overview of the design of compression members (columns) in reinforced concrete structures. It discusses various types of columns based on reinforcement, loading conditions, and slenderness ratio. It describes the classification of columns as short or slender. The document also covers effective length, braced vs unbraced columns, codal provisions for reinforcement, and functions of longitudinal and transverse reinforcement. Key points include types of column reinforcement, minimum reinforcement requirements, cover requirements, and assumptions for the limit state of collapse under compression.
This document provides design aids for reinforced concrete structures based on Indian Standard IS: 456-1978 Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete.
The design aids cover material strength and stress-strain relationships, flexural members, compression members, shear and torsion, development length and anchorage, working stress design, deflection calculation, and general tables. Charts and tables are provided for preliminary and final design of beams, slabs, and columns. Assumptions made in developing the design aids are explained. An example illustrates the use of the design aids. Important points regarding the use and limitations of the charts and tables are noted.
The design aids were prepared based on examination of international handbooks and consultation with Indian
The document discusses the design of footings for structures. It begins by explaining that footings are needed to transfer structural loads from members made of materials like steel and concrete to the underlying soil. It then describes different types of shallow and deep foundations, including spread, strap, combined, and raft footings. The document provides details on designing isolated and combined footings to resist vertical loads and moments based on provisions in IS 456. It also discusses wall footings and combined footings that support multiple columns. In summary, the document covers the purpose of footings, various footing types, and design of isolated and combined footings.
Approximate analysis methods make simplifying assumptions to determine preliminary member forces and dimensions for indeterminate structures. Case 1 assumes diagonals cannot carry compression and shares shear between diagonals. Case 2 allows compression in diagonals. Portal and cantilever methods analyze frames by dividing into substructures at assumed hinge locations, solving each sequentially from top to bottom.
This document discusses different methods for seismic analysis of reinforced concrete buildings, including linear static, nonlinear static, linear dynamic, and nonlinear dynamic analysis. It provides details on each analysis method, including the steps involved. It also presents a case study that compares the results of static and dynamic analysis methods on regular and irregular multi-storey buildings, finding that dynamic analysis more accurately predicts structural response.
This document discusses different methods for seismic analysis of reinforced concrete buildings, including linear static, nonlinear static, linear dynamic, and nonlinear dynamic analysis. It provides details on each analysis method and outlines the general procedures. It also presents a case study that compares the results of equivalent static, response spectrum, and time history analysis of regular and irregular multi-storey buildings to determine storey displacements and seismic behavior.
Sesmic strengthening and evalution of multi storey building with soft storey ...SVMohtesham
This document discusses seismic strengthening of multi-storey buildings with soft storeys. It defines local and global damage indices, with interstorey drift ratio (IDR) identified as an easy way to find the damage index. Analytical approaches like pushover analysis and time history analysis are evaluated. Experimental problems analyze buildings with varying soft storey heights subjected to earthquakes, comparing damage indices among storeys. The conclusion is that damage index increases with more storeys and higher soft storeys, and can exceed 1 based on IDR. Pushover analysis provides capacity while time history gives maximum IDR under seismic loads.
Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Structure Subjected To Different (1).pptxGoneJustin
This document summarizes a presentation on analyzing the seismic behavior of multi-story buildings with varying heights using ETABS software. It analyzes buildings with 5, 6, 7, and 8 stories under seismic, dead, and live loads. The objectives are to check the seismic response of buildings using ETABS, analyze forces, moments, stresses, strains, and deformations, and analyze story drift, displacement, shear, stiffness, period, and frequency on different floors. The methodology involves modeling the buildings in ETABS and subjecting them to static and dynamic analysis to determine responses like base shear, maximum displacement, tensile forces, and moments and shear forces.
Seismic analysis of reinforced concrete buildings -A ReviewIRJET Journal
This document discusses different methods for analyzing reinforced concrete buildings under seismic loads, including linear static, nonlinear static, linear dynamic, and nonlinear dynamic analysis. Linear static analysis (equivalent static analysis) distributes seismic forces along the height of the building based on its mass and fundamental period, while nonlinear static (pushover) analysis applies monotonically increasing lateral loads until a target displacement is reached. Linear dynamic analysis uses modal response spectrum analysis to determine seismic forces based on the building's vibration modes and acceleration response spectrum. Nonlinear dynamic analysis uses time-history analysis to model the structure's exact nonlinear response over time under recorded earthquake ground motions.
Dynamic Response of High Rise Structures Under The Influence of Shear WallsIJERA Editor
This study presents the procedure for seismic performance estimation of high-rise buildings based on a concept of the capacity spectrum method. In 3D analytical model of thirty storied buildings have been generated for symmetric buildings Models and analyzed using structural analysis tool ETABS. The analytical model of the building includes all important components that influence the mass, strength, stiffness and deformability of the structure. To study the effect of concrete core wall & shear wall at different positions during earthquake, seismic analysis using both linear static, linear dynamic and non-linear static procedure has been performed. The deflections at each storey level has been compared by performing Equivalent static, response spectrum method as well as pushover method has also been performed to determine capacity, demand and performance level of the considered building models. From the below studies it has been observed that non-linear pushover analysis provide good estimate of global as well as local inelastic deformation demands and also reveals design weakness that may remain hidden in an elastic analysis and also the performance level of the structure. Storey drifts are found within the limit as specified by code (IS: 1893-2002) in Equivalent static, linear dynamic & non-linear static analysis.
This document provides an overview of earthquake resistant design of structures. It discusses key topics like seismology, seismic zonation maps, and various methods of earthquake analysis for structural design purposes. These include equivalent static analysis, nonlinear static (pushover) analysis, response spectrum dynamic analysis, and time history dynamic analysis. Load combinations for accounting for multi-directional ground shaking are also addressed. The document serves as a reference for understanding earthquake effects on structures and performing appropriate seismic analyses.
Investigation on performance based non linear pushover analysis of flat plate...Yousuf Dinar
This document summarizes an investigation into the performance of flat plate reinforced concrete buildings under nonlinear pushover analysis. The study evaluates bare frame structures with different percentages of masonry infill, as well as structures with soft stories or shear walls. Pushover analysis was performed on a 7-story model building to determine base shear, displacement, story drift, and hinge formation at different performance levels. Results show that infill and shear walls improve seismic performance by reducing displacement, and that placing soft stories higher in the structure increases strength and stability. Shear walls performed best and controlled hinge formation, indicating more uniform response.
Seismic Vulnerability of RC Building With and Without Soft Storey Effect Usi...IJMER
A soft storey is one which has less resistance to earthquake forces than the other storeys;
Buildings containing soft stories are extremely vulnerable to earthquake collapses, since one floor is
flexible compared to others. Vulnerability of buildings is important in causing risk to life hence special
consideration is necessary for such soft storey RC buildings. In the present study, analytical
investigation of a RC building by considering the effect of soft storey situated in seismic Zone-V of
India, in accordance with IS 1893-2002 (part-1), is taken as an example and the various analytical
approaches (linear static and nonlinear static analysis) are performed on the building to identify the
seismic demand and also pushover analysis is performed to determine the performance levels, and
Capacity spectrum of the considered, also Storey Shear is compared for 3 models by using Finite
Element Software Package ETAB’s 9.7.4 version.
Seismic performance of r c buildings on sloping grounds with different types ...eSAT Journals
Abstract
Structure are highly susceptible to serve damages in earthquake scenario, so choosing an appropriate lateral force resisting
bracing systems will have a significant effect on performance of the structure. So this present study is aimed at evaluating and
comparing various types of eccentric steel bracings for 12 storey RC frame building resisting on sloping ground configurations.
For this 5 types of bracing systems like X-Bracing, Diagonal bracing, K- bracing, V-bracing and inverted V bracing are
considered on the outer periphery of the buildings with step back and set back – step back type configurations are modeled and
analyzed. The models are compared for different aspects within the structure, such as the maximum storey displacement, base
shear, storey drift and storey shear, the structure is analyzed for seismic zone V and medium soil condition as per IS 1893:2002
using ETABS software. Results conclude that on sloping ground due to irregularity on ground surface, the structures are more
vulnerable to earthquakes. Hence use of eccentric steel bracing is an effective and economical way to resist earthquake forces,
Inverted V type bracing performs well compared to other bracing types. By using inverted V type bracing in step back buildings
types maximum storey displacement of 70% and storey drift of 66% are obtained. Similarly for setback – step back configuration
maximum storey displacement of 74% and storey drift of 70% are obtained respectively.
Keywords: X-Bracing, Diagonal Bracing, K- Bracing, V-Bracing and Inverted V Bracing
This document discusses earthquake analysis and earthquake resistant design concepts. It begins with terminology related to earthquakes and seismic analysis. It then discusses the basic concepts of earthquake resistant design including structural simplicity, uniformity and symmetry. It also covers equivalent static analysis and calculating the seismic design base shear. The document discusses seismic zone coefficients, structural importance factors, response reduction factors, and seismic design categories. It concludes with discussions of site classification, soil factors, time periods, and determining lateral force coefficients and building masses.
Capacity Spectrum Method for RC Building with Cracked and Uncracked SectionIOSR Journals
one of the most widespread procedures for the assessment of building behavior, due to earthquake, is the Capacity Spectrum Method (CSM). In the scope of this procedure, capacity of the structure compares with the demands of earthquake ground motion on the structure. The capacity of the structure is represented by a nonlinear force-displacement curve, referred to as a pushover curve. The base shear forces and roof displacements are converted to equivalent spectral accelerations and spectral displacements, respectively, by means of coefficients that represent effective modal masses and modal participation factors. These spectral values define the capacity spectrum. The demands of the earthquake ground motion are represented by response spectra. A graphical construction that includes both capacity and demand spectra, results in an intersection of the two curves that estimates the performance of the structure to the earthquake. In this study, for determination of the performance levels, G+10 R.C.C. Building with cracked and uncracked section were taken. The structural Capacity of cracked and uncracked section compared with performance point value, which shows the structural capacity of building having cracked section is lesser than the uncracked section. Different modeling issues were analyzed to study the effect on Capacity of the structure with cracked and uncracked section for different position of Shear wall.
Static and Dynamic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Framed Building: A Compara...IOSR Journals
Reinforced concrete frame buildings are most common type of construction in urban India, which is subjected to several types of forces during their life time such as static forces and dynamic forces due to wind and earthquakes. The static loads are constant with time, while dynamic loads are time varying, causing considerable inertia effects .It depends mainly on location of building, importance of its use and size of the building. Its consideration in analysis makes the solution more complicated and time consuming and its negligence may sometimes becomes the cause of disaster during earthquake.
So it is growing interest in the process of designing civil engineering structures capable to withstand dynamic loads . The behavior of building under dynamic forces depends upon its mass and stiffness properties, whereas the static behavior is solely dependent upon the stiffness characteristics.
Pushover analysis was performed on a 12-story building model designed for seismic zones 3 and 5 in India. The analysis assessed damage at different performance levels from immediate occupancy to collapse. For the zone 3 design, yielding initially occurred in beams and then columns. The structure remained within collapse prevention limits, indicating ductile behavior. Similarly, the zone 5 design remained ductile with initial yielding in beams and columns. The structures designed using linear analysis for both seismic zones were found to perform well under pushover analysis and experience damage within acceptable limits.
Pushover is a static-nonlinear analysis method where a structure is subjected to gravity loading and a monotonic displacement-controlled lateral load pattern which continuously increases through elastic and inelastic behavior until an ultimate condition is reached. Lateral load may represent the range of base shear induced by earthquake loading, and its configuration may be proportional to the distribution of mass along building height, mode shapes, or another practical means.
The static pushover analysis is becoming a popular tool for seismic performance evaluation of existing and new structures. The expectation is that the pushover analysis will provide adequate information on seismic demands imposed by the design ground motion on the structural system and its components. The purpose of the paper is to summarize the basic concepts on which the pushover analysis can be based, assess the accuracy of pushover predictions, identify conditions under which the pushover will provide adequate information and, perhaps more importantly, identify cases in which the pushover predictions will be inadequate or even misleading.
Non-Linear Static (Pushover) Analysis of Irregular Building SystemsIRJET Journal
This document discusses the non-linear static (pushover) analysis of irregular building systems. It presents 6 building models of 13-story reinforced concrete buildings with different configurations of masonry infill walls and concrete shear walls to study their seismic performance. Non-linear static pushover analysis is performed using ETABS software to obtain the capacity curves and evaluate the performance of each model under seismic loading. The results show that the inclusion of masonry infill walls and concrete shear walls affects the seismic response of the irregular buildings, and that some configurations perform better than others.
Strengthening of RC Framed Structure Using Energy Dissipation DevicesIOSR Journals
A large numbers of existing buildings in India are severely deficient against earthquake forces and
the number of such buildings is growing very rapidly. This paper presents a way of using energy dissipation
devices for seismic strengthening of a RC framed structure. The objective was to improve the seismic
performance of the building to resist the earthquake. The viscous dampers are used as an energy dissipation
device in the form of single, double, inverted V, V type of dampers with different percentages of damping such
as 10%, 20% and 30% to prevent building from collapse in a major earthquake and also to control the damage
during earthquake. The performance of the buildings is assessed as per the procedure prescribed in ATC-40
and FEMA 356.
This document summarizes a study that evaluated the seismic behavior of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings in Venezuela. Three models of a sample building were analyzed: the original building design, a resizing design, and a displacement-based design. Nonlinear static and dynamic analyses were performed using software. Results found the original design did not meet code drift limits and had lower ductility than the other designs. The study aims to improve seismic design procedures in Venezuela.
1. This document discusses performing a pushover analysis on a flat slab building using SAP2000 software to evaluate its seismic performance.
2. A pushover analysis applies increasing lateral loads to identify weak zones and determine the building's strength and deformation capacities.
3. The analysis revealed that retrofitting weak columns with jacketing and adding beams could significantly improve the building's lateral strength and stiffness to withstand seismic forces.
This document provides details of the structural analysis and design of a commercial and residential building using STAAD.Pro, AutoCAD, and STAAD.Foundation software. The building is located in Trivandrum, Kerala and consists of a basement, ground plus three floors. The document describes the site details, building plans, load calculations, modeling in STAAD.Pro, design of structural elements like beams, columns, foundation, and reinforcement details. Pile foundation is adopted based on the bore log details. The analysis helps gain knowledge of designing various components using structural analysis and design software.
This document discusses scheduling problems in complex, poorly structured projects. It notes that scheduling becomes difficult when costs and durations depend on other activities or resources are specialized. A practical approach is to have experienced managers review and modify schedules before implementation. For more complex projects, the best solution is an iterative "generate and test" process where schedules are generated, tested for feasibility and constraints, and improvements are identified to generate new alternatives to test. The number of possible schedules is enormous, so considerable insight is needed to generate reasonable alternatives efficiently. Interactive scheduling systems using graphical displays and easy modification of schedules can help evaluate alternatives rapidly.
Sulphate attack occurs when sulphates react with hardened cement paste, causing expansion and cracking of concrete. Soil sulphates do not severely damage concrete, but water sulphates can enter porous concrete and react with hydration products. This forms ettringite which increases in volume, disintegrating the concrete. Sulphate attack can be external from sulphates in groundwater penetrating concrete, or internal from sulphates in the original mix. Delayed ettringite formation is a type of internal sulphate attack where ettringite decomposes during curing then reforms, expanding and damaging the concrete.
This document discusses various types of earth moving equipment used in construction projects. It describes excavation equipment like power shovels, backhoes, draglines, and clamshell buckets used to excavate earth and load trucks. It also covers excavating and earth moving equipment like scrapers and bulldozers used to dig and transport materials over long distances. Finally, it summarizes earth compacting equipment like smooth drum rollers, sheepfoot rollers, and pneumatic tyred rollers used to compact excavated earth in embankments and prepare surfaces for construction.
Dampers are mechanical systems that dissipate earthquake energy by deforming or yielding. They absorb seismic energy, reducing forces on structures and controlling building oscillations. Common types include hydraulic dampers using fluid flow, electro-rheological fluid dampers using variable viscosity fluids, metallic dampers using hysteretic behavior of metals, steel dampers using frame deformation, and friction dampers using clamped friction surfaces. Shape memory alloys also dissipate energy through large strain recovery without damage. Dampers direct earthquake energy to dissipating devices within structures, transforming mechanical energy into heat.
Pneumatic structures are membrane structures stabilized by compressed air pressure. They are round in shape to create the greatest volume with the least material. The pressure needs to be uniformly distributed for stability. Common types are air supported structures, which use air pressure above atmospheric to support the envelope, and air inflated structures, which have supporting frames inflated with high pressure air while the interior remains at atmospheric pressure. Pneumatic structures offer advantages like light weight, rapid erection, and ability to span large distances, but require continuous air pressurization and have a relatively short lifespan. Common materials for the envelope include fiberglass, polyester, ETFE, and nylon.
20CDE09- INFORMATION DESIGN
UNIT I INCEPTION OF INFORMATION DESIGN
Introduction and Definition
History of Information Design
Need of Information Design
Types of Information Design
Identifying audience
Defining the audience and their needs
Inclusivity and Visual impairment
Case study.
Unblocking The Main Thread - Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesSinan KOZAK
In the realm of Android development, the main thread is our stage, but too often, it becomes a battleground where performance issues arise, leading to ANRS, frozen frames, and sluggish Uls. As we strive for excellence in user experience, understanding and optimizing the main thread becomes essential to prevent these common perforrmance bottlenecks. We have strategies and best practices for keeping the main thread uncluttered. We'll examine the root causes of performance issues and techniques for monitoring and improving main thread health as wel as app performance. In this talk, participants will walk away with practical knowledge on enhancing app performance by mastering the main thread. We'll share proven approaches to eliminate real-life ANRS and frozen frames to build apps that deliver butter smooth experience.
Understanding Cybersecurity Breaches: Causes, Consequences, and PreventionBert Blevins
Cybersecurity breaches are a growing threat in today’s interconnected digital landscape, affecting individuals, businesses, and governments alike. These breaches compromise sensitive information and erode trust in online services and systems. Understanding the causes, consequences, and prevention strategies of cybersecurity breaches is crucial to protect against these pervasive risks.
Cybersecurity breaches refer to unauthorized access, manipulation, or destruction of digital information or systems. They can occur through various means such as malware, phishing attacks, insider threats, and vulnerabilities in software or hardware. Once a breach happens, cybercriminals can exploit the compromised data for financial gain, espionage, or sabotage. Causes of breaches include software and hardware vulnerabilities, phishing attacks, insider threats, weak passwords, and a lack of security awareness.
The consequences of cybersecurity breaches are severe. Financial loss is a significant impact, as organizations face theft of funds, legal fees, and repair costs. Breaches also damage reputations, leading to a loss of trust among customers, partners, and stakeholders. Regulatory penalties are another consequence, with hefty fines imposed for non-compliance with data protection regulations. Intellectual property theft undermines innovation and competitiveness, while disruptions of critical services like healthcare and utilities impact public safety and well-being.
Natural Is The Best: Model-Agnostic Code Simplification for Pre-trained Large...YanKing2
Pre-trained Large Language Models (LLM) have achieved remarkable successes in several domains. However, code-oriented LLMs are often heavy in computational complexity, and quadratically with the length of the input code sequence. Toward simplifying the input program of an LLM, the state-of-the-art approach has the strategies to filter the input code tokens based on the attention scores given by the LLM. The decision to simplify the input program should not rely on the attention patterns of an LLM, as these patterns are influenced by both the model architecture and the pre-training dataset. Since the model and dataset are part of the solution domain, not the problem domain where the input program belongs, the outcome may differ when the model is trained on a different dataset. We propose SlimCode, a model-agnostic code simplification solution for LLMs that depends on the nature of input code tokens. As an empirical study on the LLMs including CodeBERT, CodeT5, and GPT-4 for two main tasks: code search and summarization. We reported that 1) the reduction ratio of code has a linear-like relation with the saving ratio on training time, 2) the impact of categorized tokens on code simplification can vary significantly, 3) the impact of categorized tokens on code simplification is task-specific but model-agnostic, and 4) the above findings hold for the paradigm–prompt engineering and interactive in-context learning and this study can save reduce the cost of invoking GPT-4 by 24%per API query. Importantly, SlimCode simplifies the input code with its greedy strategy and can obtain at most 133 times faster than the state-of-the-art technique with a significant improvement. This paper calls for a new direction on code-based, model-agnostic code simplification solutions to further empower LLMs.
Response & Safe AI at Summer School of AI at IIITHIIIT Hyderabad
Talk covering Guardrails , Jailbreak, What is an alignment problem? RLHF, EU AI Act, Machine & Graph unlearning, Bias, Inconsistency, Probing, Interpretability, Bias
2. INTRODUCTION
• Since earthquake forces are random in nature and
unpredictable, the static and dynamic analysis of the
structures have become the primary concern of civil
engineers.
• The main parameters of the seismic analysis of
structures are load carrying capacity, ductility,
stiffness, damping and mass.
• IS 1893-2002 is used to carryout the seismic analysis
of multi-storey building. 2
3. SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES
• The seismic analysis type that should be used to
analyse the structure depends upon :-
external action
the behavior of structure or structural
materials
the type of structural model selected
3
4. • The different analysis procedure are
Linear Static Analysis
Nonlinear Static Analysis
Linear Dynamic Analysis
Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis
4
6. • Also known as Equivalent Static method.
• Based on formulas given in the code of practice.
STEPS
• First, the design base shear is computed for the whole building.
• It is then distributed along the height of the building.
• The lateral forces at each floor levels thus obtained are distributed
to individual lateral load resisting elements.
6
7. 7
Equivalent lateral shear force along two orthogonal axis
(Source: Nouredine Bourahla, "Equivalent Static Analysis of Structures Subjected to
Seismic Actions", Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering, Springer-Verlag Berlin
Heidelberg, 2013)
8. 8
Limitations
The use of this method is restricted with respect to
• High seismic zones and height of the structure
• Buildings having higher modes of vibration than the
fundamental mode
• Structures having significant discontinuities in mass and
stiffness along the height
9. PROCEDURE
• Calculation of the Design Seismic Base Shear, VB
• Vertical distribution of base shear along the height of
the structure
• Horizontal distribution of the level forces across the
width and breadth of the structure
• Determination of the drift, overturning moment, and
P-Delta effect
9
10. Design Seismic Base Shear, VB
From IS 1893- 2002, Clause 7.5.3, the design base shear
where,
W - seismic weight of the building
Ah - horizontal seismic coefficient
Horizontal Seismic Coefficient, Ah
As per IS 1893(Part 1)-2002, Clause 6.4.2
Provided that for any structure with T < 0.1 s, the value of Ah will not be taken less
than Z/2 whatever be the value of I/R.
10
Ah =
VB= Ah W
11. Where,
Z - Zone factor
I - Importance factor
R- Response Reduction factor
Sa/g - Average response acceleration coefficient
T -Undamped Natural period of the structure
11
12. Zone Factor ( Z)
• It is the indicator of the maximum seismic risk characterized by
Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE ) in the zone in which the
structure is located.
• According to IS 1893(Part 1)-2002, Seismic Zones are classified into
II, III, IV & V respectively.
Average response acceleration coefficient (Sa/g)
• It depends on the type of rock or soil sites and also the natural period
and damping of the structure.
• It is obtained from, Clause 6.4.5, IS 1893-2002.
12
13. Importance Factor (I)
• It depends on the occupancy category of the building.
• It is obtained from table 6, Clause 6.4.2, IS 1893-2002.
Site Class
• Site Class is determined based on the average properties of the soil within a
certain depth (30 m) from the ground surface.
Response Reduction factor (R)
• It is determined by the type of lateral load resisting system used.
• It is a measure of the system’s ability to accommodate earthquake loads and
absorb energy without collapse.
• It is obtained from table 7, IS 1893-2002.
13
14. Ta =
Fundamental Period
• The approximate fundamental natural period of vibration ( Ta ),
of a MRF building from Clause 7.6,
without brick infil panels,
with infil panels,
14
where,
h - height of the building
d- Base dimension of the building at the plinth level
Ta = 0.075 h0.75 for RC frame building
= 0.085 h0.75 for steel frame building
15. Vertical Distribution of Base Shear to Different Floor levels
The lateral force induced at any level hi as per Clause 7.7.1, IS 1893-
2002, can be determined by,
where,
Qi - Design lateral force at floor i
Wi - Seismic weight of floor i
hi - Height of floor i measured from base, and
n - Number of storey's in the building is the number of levels at
which the masses are located.
15
16. Horizontal Distribution of Base Shear
The horizontal distribution of base shear as per FEMA P749, can be
determined by
where,
Fij : force acting on the lateral force-resisting line j at a floor level i
nk : number of lateral force-resisting elements (lines)
Kij ,Kik : story stiffness of the lateral force-resisting element (line) k
and j at level i
Fi : seismic force at floor (level) i
16
17. Drift Story
• It is a measure of how much one floor or roof level displaces under
the lateral force relative to the floor level immediately below.
• It is the ratio of the difference in deflection between two adjacent
floors divided by the height of the story that separates the floors.
Overturning Moment and P-Delta Effects
• There is a tendency for the moment created by equivalent static
force acting above the base to overturn the structure.
• The dead weight of the building is sufficient to resist the overturning
force, but it must be checked always.
17
18. • The “stability coefficient” for each story as per FEMA P749, can
be calculated as,
where,
Pi - weight of the structure above the story being evaluated
i - is the design story drift determined
Vi - is the sum of the lateral seismic design forces above the story
hi - story height
18
=
20. • Also known as Pushover Analysis
• Used to estimate the strength and drift capacity of existing
structure and the seismic demand for this structure subjected to
selected earthquake.
• It can be used for checking the adequacy of new structural
design as well.
• It is an analysis in which, a mathematical model incorporates
the nonlinear load-deformation characteristics of individual
components and elements of the building which shall be
subjected to increasing lateral loads representing inertia forces
in an earthquake until a ‘target displacement’ is exceeded.
20
21. • Response characteristics that can be obtained from the pushover
analysis are
– Estimates of force and displacement capacities of the structure.
– Sequences of the failure of elements and the consequent effect
on the overall structural stability.
– Identification of the critical regions, where the inelastic
deformations are expected to be high and identification of
strength irregularities of the building.
21
22. PROCEDURE
In Pushover analysis the magnitude of the lateral load is
increased monotonically maintaining a predefined distribution
pattern along the height of the building.
Building is displaced till the ‘control node’ reaches ‘target
displacement’ or building collapses.
The sequence of cracking, plastic hinging and failure of the
structural components throughout the procedure is observed.
The relation between base shear and control node
displacement is plotted for all the pushover analysis.
22
23. 23
Schematic representation of pushover analysis procedure
(Source: Jan, T.S.; Liu, M.W. and Kao, Y.C. (2004), “An
upper-bond pushover analysis procedure for estimating
the seismic demands of high-rise buildings”. Engineering
structures. 117-128)
24. • Pushover analysis may be carried out twice:
(a) first time till the collapse of the building to estimate target
displacement.
(b) next time till the target displacement to estimate the seismic
demand.
• The seismic demands for the selected earthquake are calculated at
the target displacement level.
• The seismic demand is then compared with the corresponding
structural capacity to know what performance the structure will
exhibit.
24
25. Lateral Load Patterns
FEMA 356 suggests the use of at least two different patterns for
all pushover analysis.
Group – I
i) Code-based vertical distribution of lateral forces used in
equivalent static analysis
ii) A vertical distribution proportional to the shape of the
fundamental mode in the direction under consideration
iii) A vertical distribution proportional to the story shear
distribution calculated by combining modal responses from a
response spectrum analysis of the building
25
26. Group – II
i) A uniform distribution consisting of lateral forces at each level proportional to the
total mass at each level
ii) An adaptive load distribution that changes as the structure is displaced
26
Lateral load pattern for pushover analysis as per FEMA 356
(Source: Jan, T.S.; Liu, M.W. and Kao, Y.C. (2004), “An upper-bond
pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of high-
rise buildings”. Engineering structures. 117-128)
27. Target Displacement
Two approaches to calculate target displacement:
(a) Displacement Coefficient Method (DCM) of FEMA 356
(b) Capacity Spectrum Method (CSM) of ATC 40
• Both of these approaches use pushover curve to calculate global
displacement demand on the building.
• The only difference in these two methods is the technique used.
27
28. Displacement Coefficient Method (FEMA 356)
• This method estimates the elastic displacement of an
equivalent SDOF system assuming initial linear
properties and damping for the ground motion
excitation under consideration.
• Then it estimates the total maximum inelastic
displacement response for the building at roof by
multiplying with a set of displacement coefficients.
28
29. Capacity Spectrum Method (ATC 40)
• Uses the estimates of ductility to calculate effective period and
damping.
• This procedure uses the pushover curve in an acceleration
displacement response spectrum (ADRS) format.
• This can be obtained through simple conversion using the
dynamic properties of the system.
• The pushover curve in an ADRS format is termed a ‘capacity
spectrum’ for the structure.
• The seismic ground motion is represented by a response spectrum
in the same ADRS format and it is termed as demand spectrum.
29
31. • Response spectrum method is a linear dynamic analysis
method.
• In this approach multiple mode shapes of the building
are taken into account.
• For each mode, a response is read from the design
spectrum, based on the modal frequency and the modal
mass.
• They are then combined to provide an estimate of the
total response of the structure using modal combination
methods.
31
32. Combination methods include the following:
• Absolute Sum method
• Square Root Sum of Squares (SRSS)
• Complete Quadratic Combination (CQC)
• The design base shear calculated using the dynamic
analysis procedure is compared with a base shear Vb ,
calculated using static analysis.
• If Vb is less than , all the response quantities, eg.
member forces, displacements, storey forces, storey
shears, and base reactions, should be multiplied by Vb /
32
33. • Buildings with plan irregularities and with vertical
irregularities cannot be modelled for dynamic analysis by
this method.
• For irregular buildings, lesser than 40m in height in
zones II and III, dynamic analysis, though not mandatory,
is recommended.
33
34. Modal Analysis
Modal Mass (clause 7.8.4.5(a))
Where,
- mode shape coefficient at the floor i in the mode k
- seismic weight of floor i
34
35. Modal Participation Factor (Clause 7.8.4.5 (b))
Design lateral force at each floor level in each
mode(clause7.8.4.5(c))
Where,
Qik - peak lateral force
Ak - design horizontal acceleration spectrum
35
36. Storey shear forces in each mode (clause 7.8.4.5(d))
The peak storey shear, Vik
Lateral forces at each storey due to all modes
considered(clause 7.8.4.5(f))
36
The design lateral forces, Froof and Fi, at roof and at floor i are
given by
37. Modal Combination
• The peak response quantities should be combined as per the
Complete Quadratic combinations (CQC) method
Where,
r - number of modes being consider
ρij - the cross-modal coefficient
λi, - response quantity in mode i
λj - response quantity in mode j
ξ - model damping ratio
β - frequency ratio 37
38. Square Root Sum of Squares (SRSS)
Absolute Sum method
• If the building has a few closely spaced modes the peak response
quantity λ* due to these modes should be obtained as
38
Where λk is the absolute value of quantity in mode k, and r is the number
of modes being considered.
40. • Also known as Time History Analysis(THA)
• To perform such an analysis, a representative earthquake
time history is required for a structure being evaluated.
• In this method, the mathematical model of the building is
subjected to accelerations from earthquake records that
represent the expected earthquake at the base of the
structure.
• The method consists of a step- by- step direct integration
over a time interval.
40
41. • The time-history method is applicable to both elastic
and inelastic analysis.
• In elastic analysis the stiffness characteristics of the
structure are assumed to be constant for the whole
duration of the earthquake.
• In the inelastic analysis, however, the stiffness is
assumed to be constant through the incremental time
only.
41
42. PROCEDURE
• An earthquake record representing the design earthquake is selected.
• The record is digitized as a series of small time intervals of about 1/40
to 1/25 of a second.
• A mathematical model of the building is set up, usually consisting of a
lumped mass at each floor. Damping is considered proportional to the
velocity in the computer formulation.
• The digitized record is applied to the model as accelerations at the
base of the structure.
• The equations of motions are then investigated with the help of
software program that gives a complete record of the acceleration,
velocity, and displacement of each lumped mass at each interval.
42
43. SAP2000
• It is a finite-element-based structural program for the
analysis and design of civil structures.
• SAP2000 is object based, meaning that the models are
created using members that represent the physical reality.
• All the seismic analysis procedures can be analysed
effectively in SAP2000.
43
45. Comparative Study of Static and Dynamic Analysis of
Multi-Storey Regular & Irregular Building
• This study was carried out by Saurabh G. Lonkar, in the year 2015.
objectives of this paper were
To study the seismic behavior of RC building and to analyse the structure
using equivalent static method, time history Method and response spectrum
method followed by Pushover analysis.
Determination of storey displacements.
To check the accuracy and exactness of Time History analysis, Response
Spectrum Analysis and Equivalent Static Analysis with respect to different
conditions & aspects.
Also to check the seismic behavior and relative displacement of regular &
irregular building in different seismic zone. 45
46. Structural Analysis and Modeling
• A 22 storey residential building was modelled for zone III
in SAP2000.
• The storey plan was changing for irregular building &
symmetric for regular building.
• The building had been analyzed by using equivalent static,
response spectrum and time history analysis, based on IS
codes.
• The maximum storey displacements result had been
obtained by using all methods of analysis.
46
47. Results and Discussions
• Displacement values between static and dynamic analysis is
insignificant for lower stories but the difference is increased in
higher stories and static analysis given higher values than
dynamic analysis.
• According to damage assessment of building, it was concluded
that the damage percentage of building was different for each
method of analysis.
• Static analysis is not sufficient for high rise building its
necessary to provide dynamic analysis because of specific & non
linear distribution of forces.
• Time history analysis should be performed as it predicts the
structural response more accurately than other two methods
based on damage assessment of building.
47
48. Comparative Study of Seismic Analysis of 3-Storey
RC Frame on SAP2000
• This study was carried out by Akshay Mathane, Saurabh Hete, Tushar
Kharabe, in the year 2016
The main Objectives were -
• To analyze the building as per code IS 1893-2002 part I
• To study the response of the structure such as base shear and
lateral displacement
• To study methods of earthquake analysis (Equivalent static and
Response spectrum method)
• To study seismic analysis of frame by SAP2000 48
49. Modeling
• 3 storey building with storey height 3m having 4 bays of
5 m in X and 3 bays of 5m in Y directions for seismic
zone V was modeled in SAP2000.
Results and Discussion
49
Storey Level Displacement (Manual in mm) Displacement (SAP in mm) Displacement (%)
4 0.052469 0.050533 0.036897
3 0.044383 0.042554 0.041209
2 0.0131142 0.024788 -0.890164
1 0.015023 0.014306 0.0477268
Comparison of Storey Displacements
50. Storey Level Displacement by ESM in mm
as per SAP
Displacement by RSM in mm
as per SAP
4 0.050533 0.043112
3 0.042554 0.037057
2 0.029788 0.026739
1 0.014306 0.013248
50
Sl. No. Manual shear( kN) Base shear in SAP (kN)
1 1269.64 1282.039
Comparison of Base reaction
Comparison of Storey Displacements in ESM & RSM
Sl.No. Base shear by ESM in SAP
(kN)
Base shear by RSM in SAP
(kN)
1 1282.039 1275.628
Comparison of Base reaction in ESM & RSM
51. • Equivalent static method was simpler than Response Spectrum method, but
Static analysis was not sufficient for high-rise building.
• SAP results for Equivalent static and Response spectrum method were
nearly same.
• The results obtained from static analysis method shows higher storey
displacement values as compared to response spectrum analysis.
• Manual and SAP result of story displacement, base reaction of Equivalent
Static method were approximately same.
• Response spectrum of irregular and multistory building was very tedious
work but for the analysis of any type of building this method can be
preferred to get better results.
• Response spectrum results were more accurate than Equivalent static
method.
51
52. STRUCTRAL ANALYSIS AND MODELLING
• A 2D Frame of floor height 3m was modelled by SAP2000.
• Building has 2 bays of 3 m in X direction.
• The grade of concrete is M25.
• Pushover analysis procedure were carried out for 2D frame.
• Lateral load of 10kN and a Vertical load of 100kN was applied at
the roof level.
• Hinge support was provided.
• P- Delta effects were included in analysis. 52
54. 54
Pushover Curve
• Pushover analyses using uniform lateral load pattern yielded capacity curves
with lower initial stiffness and base shear capacity but higher roof displacement
55. CONCLUSION
• Dynamic analysis for simple structures can be carried out manually,
but for complex structures finite element analysis can be used to
calculate the mode shapes and frequencies.
• Depending upon the accuracy of results needed and the importance
of the building that should be analysed various seismic analysis
procedures can be adopted like Linear Static Analysis, Nonlinear
Static Analysis, Linear Dynamic Analysis and Nonlinear Dynamic
Analysis.
• For smaller structures, response spectrum analysis or equivalent
static analysis can be used with little effort.
• If accurate and precise result is wanted from the analysis, then we
should carryout non-linear dynamic analysis.
55
56. • Nonlinear relationship between force and displacement
in multi-storey building structures may be determined
easy enough with the application of nonlinear static
pushover analysis.
• SAP2000 provides almost accurate results when
compared with manual calculations.
56
57. REFERENCE
[1] Chopra AK (1995). “Dynamics of Structures Theory and Application to Earthquake Engineering”, University of California at Berkeley, USA.
[2] Duggal S K (2010). “Earthquake Resistance Design of Structure”, Fourth Edition, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
[3] FEMA 356 (2000), “Pre-standard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings”, American Society of Civil Engineers, USA.
[4] IS 1893 Part 1 (2002). “Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[5] Jan. T.S, Liu. M.W. and Kao. Y.C. (2004), “An upper-bond pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of high-rise buildings”,
Engineering structures. 117-128.
[6] Nouredine Bourahla (2013), "Equivalent Static Analysis of Structures Subjected to Seismic Actions", Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering, Springer-
Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
[7] Pankaj Agarwal and Manish Shrikhande (2014)."Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures", PHI Learning Private Limited, Delhi.
[8] Prof. Sakshi Manchalwar, Akshay Mathane, Saurabh Hete and Tushar Kharabe "Comparative Study of Seismic Analysis of 3-Storey RC Frame",
International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR), April 2016, ISSN: 2278- 7798 .
[9] Saurabh G Lonkar and Riyaz Sameer Shah, ''Comparative Study of Static and Dynamic Analysis of Multi-Storey Regular & Irregular Building-A Review",
International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Technologies (IJRESTs), ISSN 2395-6453.
57