NCCMT Spotlight Webinar: Guide to Policy-Influence Evaluation

Join Dr. Sarah Neil-Sztramko, Knowledge Translation Advisor, and Dr. Maureen Dobbins, Scientific Director, to learn how the NCCMT quickly pivoted to meet decision makers’ needs for high-quality synthesized evidence during the COVID-19 pandemic. The presentation will include an overview of how rigorous review methods were adapted to the ever-changing COVID-19 evidence landscape and provide time for discussion and questions from webinar participants. Reviews from the Rapid Evidence Service are available here: https://www.nccmt.ca/res​, and a pre-print article describing methods is available here: https://www.researchsquare.com/articl...​. Learning Objectives: By the end of this webinar, you will: 1. Learn about the methods for conducting rigorous rapid reviews in the face of quickly evolving evidence. 2. Apply knowledge of the strengths and limitations of rapid reviews to decision making. 3. Gain tools and resources to apply to rapid reviews in your own work.

We will introduce the National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy’s online course in public health ethics, including its development and an overview of its content. We will then pass the microphone to a health professional who will discuss the ethical challenges she has faced in professional practice, as well as her experience in taking the course. By the end of this webinar, participants will be able to: • Understand how an ethical perspective can inform decision making • Describe some of the main elements of the online course • See how the knowledge and practical skills in applied ethics offered by the course may be put to use in professional practice.

The NCCMT looks forward to hosting its popular student-led webinar on evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) in public health programs. During this webinar, students and recent graduates showcase how they are using EIDM tools and resources. EIDM skills are in demand in the workforce. Join this webinar to learn how the NCCMT’s accessible and informative resources can support your coursework, practicums and future public health careers.

Join us for a discussion of methods and tools that can be used to support evidence-informed decision making in the context of health equity. Learn about resources to help you apply health equity principles to planning processes that contribute to evidence informed public health. Guest speakers from Niagara Region Public Health discussed the use of the 10 promising practices to address health equity. This included the results of a qualitative study to identify barriers and facilitators, and provided recommendations for strengthening planning and implementation practice to improve health equity. This webinar is jointly produced by the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) and the National Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health (NCCDH), and is supported through funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada. The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada. NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.

The Program Evaluation Toolkit, developed by the Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health, outlines a three-phase process to apply to program evaluation. It contains useful lists, steps and templates for developing a logic model and final report. This toolkit can be used by anyone involved in planning and conducting program evaluation, accessing data sources and analysing data on an ongoing basis. To see the summary statement of this tool developed by NCCMT, click here: http://www.nccmt.ca/resources/search/68 The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada. NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.

The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) hosted our popular student-oriented webinar on evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) in public health programs. The NCCMT supports students learning remotely by continuing to provide online resources for EIDM. Learn how these resources can support your coursework, practicums and public health careers. Recent Master of Public Health (MPH) graduates from programs across the country provide fresh perspectives and share their experiences of using research evidence in their own work.

This webinar on evidence-informed decision-making, delivered jointly by NCCMT and NCCID, draws on the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) seven-step process, with reference to how methods and tools for each step can apply to infectious disease prevention. The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada. NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.

The following document outlines the supporting tools that were discussed in the Spotlight on Methods and Tools: Rapid Review Guidebook: Synthesizing Evidence to Inform Public Health Practice webinar. These tools aid in the production of a rapid review and are specific to the first five stages of the Evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) process.

Join Dr. Anthony Levinson and Kalpana Nair, PhD from McMaster University as they discuss the Early Years Check-In (EYCI) and its companion web-based resource, Play&Learn. Designed for parents of children 18 months to 6 years of age, the EYCI helps parents quickly identify any concerns they may have about their child’s development across four domains: social and emotional, language, movement, and thinking and learning. The EYCI can be used as a discussion aid to foster dialogue about early child development between parents and practitioners providing early years services, creating opportunities to build relationships as well as provide education and support to parents to foster their child’s development.

Commissioner Choucair's keynote presentation at the 2014 Wisconsin Public Health Association Annual Conference

Join us in launching the NCCMT’s new tools for assessing the quality of community evidence. These tools can be applied to evidence for local health issues and context, such as surveillance data and community health status reports, as well as evidence for community and political preferences and actions, such as the expressed needs and interests of community members and support from public or government officials.

This sample answer sheet corresponds with the ninth webinar in the Online Journal Club series, “What are public health interventions’ return on investment?" The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada. NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.

This document provides guidance on recruiting patient and public partners for research engagement. It discusses important considerations around language and inclusion. Key aspects of developing a recruitment strategy are described, such as determining the purpose and goals of engagement and identifying motivations, roles and time commitments. The document provides a template for a call for patient partners, covering project details, the engagement opportunity, responsibilities, timelines, and contact information. It also offers tips for recruitment methods, screening applicants, and tips for successful engagement.

Ce webinaire est offert en anglais. L’enregistrement audio sera accessible en ligne après la séance. Les diapositives de l’exposé seront affichées en ligne, en anglais et en français. Les diapositives en français peuvent être obtenues à l’avance sur demande. Veuillez nous envoyer un courriel à l’adresse ccnmo@mcmaster.ca. Evaluability assessments in public health Evaluability assessments are completed before an evaluation and are designed to maximize the chances that a subsequent evaluation will result in useful information. Evaluability assessments point the way to evaluations that have the best chance of revealing important information by facilitating the following: Shed light on disagreements among stakeholders Describe the logic of a program Indicate the need for adjustments in activities and resources Inform stakeholders about options for evaluation and their potential usefulness Reveal problems before decision makers commit to a formal evaluation How can the evaluability assessment method help you? Evaluability assessments are described as cyclical, iterative processes that build an understanding of the program design, the underlying program logic model or theory of change, and the opportunities for useful evaluation and potential program improvement. Evaluation is one of the public health competencies and this method helps public health professionals conduct evaluations of programs, policies or practices. Join us to learn more! Click here to access the method: http://www.nccmt.ca/resources/search/290

The document summarizes a presentation given by Dr. Steven Pearson of the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) on developing a framework for assessing the value of medical treatments for US health insurers. ICER has created a framework that considers clinical effectiveness, additional benefits, affordability, and other factors to determine a treatment's "clinical care value" and "health system value." ICER engaged stakeholders including insurers, manufacturers, and patient groups to gather input on the framework. ICER aims for the framework to facilitate more transparent and consistent discussions between payers and manufacturers about a treatment's value.

This webinar on evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) draws on The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT)'s seven-step process, with reference to methods and tools for each step that are specific to healthy weights. The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada. NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada. Visit the NCCMT website (www.nccmt.ca) or contact nccmt@mcmaster.ca for more information.

Join Dr. David Buckeridge, in partnership with the Office of the Chief Public Health Officer (CPHO) and the National Collaborating Centres for Public Health, to learn more about approaches to establishing and assuring the components for developing a data system, along with consideration of overarching factors such as options for coordinating and leading the development and operation of a coordinated network of systems to inform a bold vision for a renewed public health system in Canada.

Vous souhaitez apprendre comment évaluer l’influence des politiques? Faites-vous la promotion de la mise en place et de la diffusion de connaissances provenant d’interventions en santé des populations? Souhaitez-vous explorer des études de cas d’évaluation de l’influence des politiques en santé publique? Le Guide pour évaluer l’influence sur les politiques peut vous aider! Ce guide a été développé par la Stratégie d’innovation de l’Agence de la santé publique de du Canada et a été produit par la firme de consultation Cathexis. Comment le Guide pour évaluer l’influence sur les politiques peut-il vous aider? Le Guide pour évaluer l’influence sur les politiques a été mis au point pour aider les organismes à utiliser l’influence sur les politiques afin d’améliorer la mise en œuvre et l’évaluation d’interventions en santé des populations fondées sur des données probantes. Le processus se divise en quatre étapes destinées à planifier l’évaluation. Chacune d’elles renferme au moins deux ressources pour soutenir l’étape de l’évaluation. Celles-ci sont résumées et les grands points sont exposés dans la méthode. Ce webinaire comprend un survol du Guide par ses créateurs, suivi d’une présentation par une organisation communautaire qui a évalué l’impact sur les politiques dans leur travail visant à promouvoir des poids plus sains. Le Guide pour évaluer l’influence sur les politiques comprend trois études de cas en santé publique : •les poids santé chez les enfants et les jeunes autochtones; •la prévention de l’intimidation dans les écoles primaires; •la sécurité alimentaire et les poids santé. •Inscrivez-vous pour en apprendre davantage! Cliquez ici pour lire le sommaire qu’a élaboré le CCNMO sur la méthode : http://www.nccmt.ca/fr/ressources/interrogez-le-registre/241 Le Centre de collaboration nationale des méthodes et outils est financé par l’Agence de la santé publique du Canada et affilié à l’Université McMaster. Les vues exprimées ici ne reflètent pas nécessairement la position officielle de l’Agence de la santé publique du Canada. Le CCNMO est l’un des six centres de collaboration nationale en santé publique au Canada. Les Centres encouragent et améliorent l’utilisation des connaissances provenant de la recherche scientifique et des autres savoirs afin de renforcer la pratique et les politiques de santé publique au Canada.

Cette exemple de feuille de réponse correspond au deuxième webinaire de la série club de lecture en ligne, « Quelles sont les stratégies efficaces pour améliorer l'immunisation chez les adolescents? » Le Centre de collaboration nationale des méthodes et outils est financé par l’Agence de la santé publique du Canada et affilié à l’Université McMaster. Les vues exprimées ici ne reflètent pas nécessairement la position officielle de l’Agence de la santé publique du Canada. Le CCNMO est l’un des six centres de collaboration nationale en santé publique au Canada. Les Centres encouragent et améliorent l’utilisation des connaissances provenant de la recherche scientifique et des autres savoirs afin de renforcer la pratique et les politiques de santé publique au Canada.

Vous intéressez-vous aux critères fondés sur des données probantes pour une communication claire dans les documents de santé publique? Êtes-vous relecteur ou rédacteur de documents de communication en santé publique? Désirez-vous améliorer la clarté et la facilité de compréhension de ces documents? Le Clear Communication Index peut vous aider! Cet indice a été développé par les Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Comment le Clear Communication Index peut-il vous aider? L’indice permet de développer et d’examiner les documents de communication en santé publique pour plus de clarté. Il encourage la collaboration entre les auteurs et les examinateurs pour assurer l’exactitude et permet d’évaluer la facilité d’utilisation du matériel de communication. L’outil est axé sur des critères qui améliorent la clarté et la compréhension. Le recours au Clear Communication Index permet d’attribuer un score quantitatif basé sur l’évaluation de sept domaines : message principal et appel à l’action, langue, conception de l’information, état de la science, recommandations comportementales, chiffres et risques. Un widget est accessible pour une utilisation dans les pages Web. Ce webinaire comprend un aperçu de l’indice par ses développeurs et sera suivi d’une présentation de (description de l’histoire de l’utilisateur). Cliquez ici pour lire le sommaire qu’a élaboré le CCNMO sur la méthode : http://www.nccmt.ca/fr/ressources/interrogez-le-registre/247 Le Centre de collaboration nationale des méthodes et outils est financé par l’Agence de la santé publique du Canada et affilié à l’Université McMaster. Les vues exprimées ici ne reflètent pas nécessairement la position officielle de l’Agence de la santé publique du Canada. Le CCNMO est l’un des six centres de collaboration nationale en santé publique au Canada. Les Centres encouragent et améliorent l’utilisation des connaissances provenant de la recherche scientifique et des autres savoirs afin de renforcer la pratique et les politiques de santé publique au Canada.

contains adequate info. about group theory...some contents are not seen coz...thr r images on top of the info.... wud suggest to download and see the ppt on slideshow...content is good and adequate..!!

Easton constructed a systems theory model of politics that defines the basic processes of any political system. The model views the political system as converting "inputs" from the environment, like demands and support from citizens, into "outputs" like policies, plans and programs. There is also "feedback" as citizens react to outputs. The environment outside the political system also influences inputs, decision-making, outputs and feedback. However, critics argue the model presents an overly mechanical and rigid view of politics that better describes stable democracies and has a "black box" view of how decisions are made inside the political system.

The document outlines the key stages of the policy making process: 1) Issue identification where problems are publicized and gain government attention 2) Agenda setting where the government begins serious consideration of issues 3) Policy formulation where various alternatives are developed and considered 4) Policy adoption where policies are legitimized through official government statements and actions 5) Policy implementation which involves all activities that result from officially adopting a policy.

Fall Global Health Practitioner Conference 2017 Planning and Conducting Advocacy at National and Subnational Levels Kavita Sethuraman, Annie Toro, & Danielle Heilberg

Budget Advocacy in Nigeria an ways in which nutrition desk officers/state actors can engage for better nutrition funding

The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is excited to present a two-part webinar featuring the Policy Readiness Tool In Part 2, you will hear the stories of how public health practitioners have used the Policy Readiness Tool in practice and discuss challenges and successes when applying the Policy Readiness Tool. ALSO AVAILABLE ON YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHtFaVCpvhE Part 1 slides are available here: http://www.slideshare.net/NCCMT/nccmt-webinar-policyreadinesstoolpt19172015en A summary statement of this tool developed by NCCMT is available here: http://www.nccmt.ca/registry/view/eng/144.html NCCMT is one of six NCCs for Public Health in Canada. More on the NCCs at www.nccph.ca. Production of this webinar has been made possible through a financial contribution from the Public Health Agency of Canada. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.

This document discusses challenges, methodologies, and solutions for evaluating advocacy efforts. It begins by defining advocacy and distinguishing it from other types of campaigns. Key challenges include focusing on activities rather than outcomes and proving impact. The document recommends understanding the desired changes, monitoring progress, selecting appropriate evaluation methods, estimating influence on changes, and sharing lessons learned. A variety of evaluation methods are described, from stakeholder interviews to contribution analysis. The goal is to integrate evaluation into advocacy strategies to continually improve efforts and demonstrate successes.

This document summarizes the work of the Self-directed Support Project Team in developing a framework to support the implementation of Self-directed Support in Scotland. It outlines the engagement process, key issues identified, proposed SDS standards to address these issues, and next steps which include a public consultation on the draft framework. The goal is to move practice from a deficit-based approach to one focused on empowering individual choice, control, and human rights in social care.

This document provides guidance on creating effective policy briefs. It discusses what a policy brief is, how to plan for policy influence by understanding your audience and context, how to craft clear and memorable messages, and how to structure a policy brief with key elements like an executive statement, introduction, methodology, results, implications and recommendations, and references. The goal is to communicate research findings to policymakers in a concise way that will inform and influence decision making.

This seminar covered Extension's involvement in health initiatives at the community level. It discussed strategic health priorities for Extension and the role of social media in outreach. The National Institute of Food and Agriculture aims to increase access to health services and clinical preventive care through Extension programs. Extension also launched a multi-state Health Insurance Literacy Initiative to educate consumers about selecting health plans under the Affordable Care Act. Connecting programs and outreach at the local level will be important for implementing health reform.

Health Evidence, in partnership with the National Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health, hosted a 90 minute webinar, funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (KTB-112487), presenting key messages and implications for practice in the area of social determinants of health on Wednesday September 19, 2012 at 1:00 pm EST. Maureen Dobbins, Scientific Director of Health Evidence, lead the webinar, which included interactive discussion with Sume Ndumbe-Eyoh, Knowledge Translation Specialist at the National Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health.

NHS Improving Quality was invited to take part in a recently held event that celebrated the work that is being done in partnership between the Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust and AQuA to deliver a Quality Improvement Methodologies Programme (QuIMP). Gillian Phazey, Learning and Organisational Development Manager at Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust explains: 'The Learning and Organisational Development and Governance teams at the Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust have been working collaboratively with AQuA to deliver a Quality Improvement Methodologies Programme (QuIMP) to support staff in developing knowledge and skills in this topic. The programme has been specifically designed to support colleagues wanting to gain an introduction to the fundamentals and concepts of quality improvement. So far, two cohorts of staff, from clinical and non-clinical areas of the Trust have completed the programme, and have completed quality improvement projects in their own work area to apply their knowledge. On 17th July a celebration event was held for cohort 2 where staff presented their work in poster or presentation form, the aim of which is to share and spread learning across the Trust. Projects were wide ranging, from introducing new processes to reduce complaints and drug errors, to improving patient experience by implementing new tools and techniques. The day was a great success with the Chief Executive and Chief Nurse in attendance. The Trust is highly supportive of this approach in equipping staff with these important techniques, and the programme supports not only our internal quality agenda and objectives, but more widely responds to the recommendations of the Berwick report. The next cohort is starting in September this year.' Fiona Thow, Patient Safety Collaborative Delivery Lead at NHS Improving Quality delivered a keynote speech, (link to presentation slides) providing a national perspective on the plans for improving patient safety and took the opportunity to introduce the national safety collaboratives. She also highlighted the need for organisations and individuals to think differently about safety for both patients and staff.

Health Impact Assessment (HIA) is a structured and innovative process for prospectively assessing the potential impacts of a project, program or policy on the health and well-being of populations. In order to support capacity building in the field of HIA, the National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy (NCCHPP) has developed an online course on HIA. This 5-hour course is available free of charge in English and French and can be accessed at any time upon registration. It aims to familiarize participants with the process of conducting health impact assessments of projects, programs, and policies in collaboration with relevant stakeholders.

This document discusses fostering research for policy and practitioners through cohort and longitudinal studies. It provides an overview of CIFF's mission and strategic priority areas. CIFF seeks transformational impact through a systematic approach across sectors like education, nutrition, health, and climate change. CIFF currently has a portfolio of 57 investments totaling $560 million spread across innovation, pilot programs, delivery at scale, and systems change. The document discusses challenges in achieving scale and uptake of research findings, and how CIFF is approaching these challenges through clear theories of change, cost evaluations, communication of evidence, and partnerships.

There are many examples of evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) among public health professionals and organizations in Canada. However, there are limited mechanisms in place to facilitate the sharing of these stories within the public health community. The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) seeks to address this gap with an interactive, peer-led webinar series featuring a collection of EIDM success stories in public health. These success stories will illustrate what EIDM in public health practice, programs and policy looks like across the country. Join us to engage with public health practitioners across Canada as they share their success stories of using or implementing EIDM in the real world. Learn about the strategies and tools used by presenters to improve the use of evidence. Building a cultural foundation for EIDM: An evaluative thinking communications campaign Kristin Beaton, Huron County Health Unit In an effort to build evaluation and evidence-informed decision making capacity, Huron County Health Unit has implemented several strategies to encourage evaluative thinking. Learn more about how this health unit built a learning organizational culture. Testing integrated knowledge translation processes to improve the participation of children with disabilities in leisure activities in British Columbia Dr. Ebele Mogo and Dr. Keiko Shikako-Thomas, McGill University To improve policies on physical activity promotion for people with disabilities, this team undertook a project to bridge the evidence to policy gap. Learn more about how a community forum and policy dialogue were used to help bridge this gap and inform policymakers about evidence.

This document outlines an agenda and materials for a workshop on developing statewide initiatives to support paraeducator career growth. The workshop will explore five strategic steps: defining the need, developing partnerships, preparing a plan, securing support, and maintaining collaboration. A panel will then discuss lessons from Washington state's paraeducator legislation process. The panel will take questions from attendees.

This presentation helped facilitate a TWG meeting primarily focused on providing direction to Task Groups

"An enjoyable presentation, well-delivered with excellent insight into community and stakeholder engagement strategies. Terry Dyni - July 23, 2015" on the webinar version. This version is my complete slide deck from a live webinar presentation requested by the Conference Board of Canada. April, 2015. Thanks for your interest in Better Healthcare Through Community and Stakeholder Engagement. Compliments of Paul W. Gallant, CHE, GALLANT HEALTHWORKS & Associates (GHWA), Vancouver, BC, Canada. PS See the last slide for contact details or to arrange customized training/facilitation or advice on your organizational needs.

This document discusses bridging the gap between research and practice in health programs and policies. It notes there is often a divide between researchers and decision-makers due to differing perspectives and priorities. The document advocates placing research within the policy and program continuum to better align research with decision-making needs. This involves considering how research outcomes could inform advocacy, policy formulation, program design, monitoring or evaluation. It also stresses involving stakeholders throughout the research process to promote evidence-based decision-making.

The document summarizes a workshop on building skills to advocate for change using health data. The workshop covered developing advocacy strategies, identifying target audiences, crafting messages, selecting communication channels, and assessing the impact of advocacy efforts. Attendees participated in activities to develop an advocacy strategy and elevator speech for a health issue. The goal was to help participants learn how to use data to directly and indirectly influence decision makers and support policies.

1) The document discusses agenda setting in the policy process and how clinical practice issues can be moved onto organizational agendas. 2) It provides required readings on stakeholder engagement, policy briefs, nursing advocacy, and research usefulness for policymaking. 3) Readers are asked to identify a clinical practice issue for their organization's agenda, stakeholders interested in the issue, and strategies to inform and persuade stakeholders of the issue's importance.

The document discusses assessing the impact of health research and innovation from a systems perspective. It presents a Canadian framework that identifies five categories of research impact: advancing knowledge, capacity building, informing decision making, health benefits, and broad economic and social benefits. The framework includes a library of 66 impact indicators that can be measured at different levels. It also discusses promising tools for addressing needs across the system, including a common approach, language, and metrics to optimize measuring research impact in Canada. Building greater capacity for impact assessment using a collaborative approach is advocated.

This summary provides an overview of 3 implementation research studies on integrated community case management (iCCM) conducted by the University Research Co., LLC. The first study analyzed iCCM policies in 6 countries to understand how policy context, actors, and processes influence iCCM implementation. It found that policies often did not explicitly mention iCCM and were developed with technical staff but lacked engagement from key stakeholders. External funding was critical for policy development. The second study developed an iCCM costing and financing tool to help countries estimate costs and plan long-term financing. It was tested in Malawi and Senegal. The third study examined an iCCM monitoring improvement project in an unnamed country. Overall, the studies provide insights into real-

L’évaluation critique est une étape inestimable du processus de prise de décision éclairée par des données probantes. Cependant, il peut être difficile de choisir et d’intégrer les outils d’évaluation critique appropriés. Le CCNMO est heureux d’accueillir la Dre Marilyn Macdonald et la Dre Lori Weeks du JBI Centre of Excellence (https://www.dal.ca/faculty/health/nursing/research/JBI.html), qui présenteront un webinaire sur l’évaluation critique des données probantes issues de la recherche en santé publique. Cette séance offrira un aperçu de l’importance de l’évaluation critique ainsi qu’une introduction à certains des outils d’évaluation critique du JBI (https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools).

Critical appraisal is an invaluable step in the evidence-informed decision making process. However, it can be challenging to select appropriate critical appraisal tools and apply their use in practice. The NCCMT is excited to host Dr. Marilyn Macdonald and Dr. Lori Weeks from the JBI Centre of Excellence (https://www.dal.ca/faculty/health/nursing/research/JBI.html) to present a webinar on the critical appraisal of public health research evidence. This session will provide an overview of the importance of critical appraisal as well as an introduction to some of JBI’s critical appraisal tools (https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools).

Joignez-vous aux lauréates 2024 des Bourses d’application des connaissances pour étudiants du Centre de collaboration nationale en santé publique (CCNMO) afin de prendre directement connaissance de leurs travaux essentiels permettant de combler l’écart entre la recherche et la pratique. Ces étudiantes et ces nouvelles diplômées dirigent des stratégies d’application des connaissances novatrices. Cette séance souligne leur excellence scolaire et met de l’avant des stratégies uniques et transférables pour s’attaquer aux priorités actuelles en matière de santé publique. Hannah Bayne, Université de l’Alberta – Supporting tomorrow’s stewards: A knowledge mobilization project for climate-health literacy in Alberta elementary schools [Soutenir les intendants et intendantes de demain : un projet de mobilisation des connaissances en faveur de la littératie climat-santé dans les écoles primaires de l’Alberta] Miranda Field, Université de Regina – Decolonized theory of place [La théorie du lieu décolonisée] Jordan Chin, Université McMaster – The art of creation: An arts-based knowledge translation method to promote and advocate for a healthy start to life [L’art de la création : une méthode d’application des connaissances fondée sur les arts pour promouvoir et défendre un bon départ en santé]

Join the winners of the 2024 National Collaborating Centre for Public Health (NCCPH) Knowledge Translation Student Awards and get a first-hand look at their crucial work in bridging the gap between research and practice. These students are leading innovative knowledge translation strategies. This session highlights their academic excellence and features unique and transferable strategies to address today’s public health priorities. Hannah Bayne, University of Alberta - Supporting Tomorrow’s Stewards: A Knowledge Mobilization Project for Climate-Health Literacy in Alberta Elementary Schools Miranda Field, University of Regina - Decolonized Theory of Place Jordan Chin, McMaster University - The Art of Creation: an Arts-Based Knowledge Translation Method to Promote and Advocate for a Healthy Start to Life

Avez-vous besoin d’aide pour évaluer la qualité de différents types de données probantes non issues de la recherche? Ce webinaire vous guidera à travers des exemples de cas montrant la manière d’utiliser l’Outil d’évaluation de la qualité des données probantes issues de la communauté (ÉQDPIC) et l'outil de planification et d’évaluation des ressources (PÉR) pour évaluer la qualité des données probantes contextuelles, y compris les problèmes de santé locaux, les préférences et les actions communautaires et politiques, ainsi que les ressources financières et humaines. Dans le but de soutenir l’utilisation de ces outils après le webinaire, nous offrons du mentorat en courtage de connaissances.

Do you need help with quality appraisal of different types of non-research evidence? This webinar will walk you through case examples showing how to use NCCMT’s Quality Assessment of Community Evidence (QACE) and Resource Planning and Assessment (RPA) tools to assess the quality of contextual evidence, including local health issues, community and political preferences and actions, and financial and human resources. Alongside the webinar, we are offering Knowledge Brokering mentorship to support post-webinar use of the tools.

Le CCNMO se réjouit d’organiser son populaire webinaire étudiant sur la prise de décision éclairée par des données probantes (PDÉDP) dans les programmes de santé publique. Dans ce webinaire, des étudiants et de récents diplômés montreront les manières dont ils utilisent des outils et des ressources en matière de PDÉDP. Les habiletés en matière de PDÉDP sont très recherchées sur le marché du travail. Participez à ce webinaire pour découvrir les manières dont les ressources accessibles et enrichissantes du CCNMO peuvent vous soutenir dans vos cours, vos stages et votre future carrière en santé publique. Profitez de cette occasion d’apprendre d’autres étudiants et de récents diplômés. Ce webinaire fera participer des étudiants actuels et de récents diplômés de programmes de maîtrise en santé publique (M.P.H.) au Canada qui parleront de leurs expériences d’utilisation des données probantes dans leur travail.

The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) hosts its popular student-led webinar on evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) in public health programs. During this webinar, students and recent graduates showcase how they use EIDM tools and resources. Watch this webinar to learn how the NCCMT’s accessible and informative resources can support your coursework, practicums and future public health careers. This webinar features current students and recent graduates from Master of Public Health (MPH) and other graduate programs in Canada who share their experiences using evidence in their work.

Joignez-vous aux lauréates des Bourses d’application des connaissances pour étudiants du Centre de collaboration nationale en santé publique (CCNSP) afin de prendre directement connaissance de leurs travaux essentiels permettant de combler l’écart entre la recherche et la pratique. Ces étudiantes et ces nouvelles diplômées dirigent des stratégies d’application des connaissances novatrices. Cette séance souligne leur excellence scolaire et met de l’avant des stratégies uniques et transférables pour s’attaquer aux priorités actuelles en matière de santé publique. Jorden Hendry, Université de la Colombie-Britannique – « Les instructions sont fournies : comprendre et mettre en œuvre les engagements fondamentaux pris envers les peuples autochtones par le Bureau du médecin hygiéniste provincial de la Colombie-Britannique »; Karen Wong, Université de la Colombie-Britannique – « Une description des manières dont les travaux universitaires mettent en œuvre des stratégies d’application des connaissances en santé publique »; Leah Taylor, Université Western – « Tout le monde peut jouer : une ressource en application des connaissances pour promouvoir la participation à l’activité physique chez les enfants vivant avec un handicap à London (Ontario) ».

Join the winners of the National Collaborating Centre for Public Health (NCCPH) Knowledge Translation (KT) Student Awards and get a first-hand look at their crucial work in bridging the gap between research and practice. These students and recent graduates are leading innovative knowledge translation strategies. This session highlights their academic excellence and features unique and transferable strategies to address today’s public health priorities. Jorden Hendry, University of British Columbia – Instructions have been provided: Understanding and implementing Foundational Commitments to Indigenous Peoples in the BC Office of the Provincial Health Officer. Karen Wong, University of British Columbia – Description of how academic work implements public health knowledge translation strategies. Leah Taylor, Western University – Everyone Can Play: A Knowledge Translation Resource to Promote Physical Activity Participation of Children with Disabilities in London, Ontario.

Une grande incertitude découle de l’apparition de nouvelles maladies infectieuses comme la COVID-19, ce qui pose des défis uniques en matière de communication, différents d’autres initiatives de communication en santé. Une communication de crise efficace est essentielle à la promotion des comportements de prévention recommandés (comme la distanciation physique, l’hygiène des mains, le port du masque et la vaccination) et au maintien de la confiance durant la crise. Cette séance présentera un survol des meilleures pratiques en matière de communication de crise en santé publique dans les médias sociaux et abordera leur application concrète durant la COVID-19. D’abord, les meilleures pratiques en ce qui a trait à une communication de crise efficace pour démontrer que l’on est digne de confiance seront présentées. Le guide de communication de crise dans les médias sociaux, largement diffusé et téléchargé, offre des conseils pratiques en matière de santé publique. Par la suite, la communication de crise de Santé publique Ottawa dans les médias sociaux durant la COVID-19 sera examinée pour mettre en évidence les leçons tirées et les principales stratégies utilisées par l’équipe. Le compte Twitter de Santé publique Ottawa est le compte d’une autorité locale de santé publique le plus suivi en Amérique du Nord, et l’excellence de son travail dans les médias sociaux tout au long de la pandémie de COVID-19 a été soulignée par des organisations comme l’Agence de la santé publique du Canada, l’Organisation mondiale de la Santé, la Fondation Rockefeller et plusieurs autres.