The papers in this volume were presented at the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024), sponsored by the ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory (SIGACT). The conference was held in Vancouver, Canada, June 24--28, 2024, with the papers being presented as live talks.
Explicit Orthogonal Arrays and Universal Hashing with Arbitrary Parameters
Orthogonal arrays are a type of combinatorial design that emerged in the 1940s in the design of statistical experiments. In 1947, Rao proved a lower bound on the size of any orthogonal array, and raised the problem of constructing arrays of minimum size. ...
Tree Evaluation Is in Space 𝑂 (log 𝑛 · log log 𝑛)
The Tree Evaluation Problem (TreeEval) (Cook et al. 2009) is a central candidate for separating polynomial time (P) from logarithmic space (L) via composition. While space lower bounds of Ω(log2 n) are known for multiple restricted models, it was ...
Locality Bounds for Sampling Hamming Slices
Spurred by the influential work of Viola (Journal of Computing 2012), the past decade has witnessed an active line of research into the complexity of (approximately) sampling distributions, in contrast to the traditional focus on the complexity of ...
No Complete Problem for Constant-Cost Randomized Communication
We prove that the class of communication problems with public-coin randomized constant-cost protocols, called BPP0, does not contain a complete problem. In other words, there is no randomized constant-cost problem Q ∈ BPP0, such that all other problems P ...
Explicit Separations between Randomized and Deterministic Number-on-Forehead Communication
We study the power of randomness in the Number-on-Forehead (NOF) model in communication complexity. We construct an explicit 3-player function f:[N]3 → {0,1}, such that: (i) there exist a randomized NOF protocol computing it that sends a constant number ...
Index Terms
- Proceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
Recommendations
Acceptance Rates
Year | Submitted | Accepted | Rate |
---|---|---|---|
STOC '15 | 347 | 93 | 27% |
STOC '14 | 319 | 91 | 29% |
STOC '13 | 360 | 100 | 28% |
STOC '11 | 304 | 84 | 28% |
STOC '08 | 325 | 80 | 25% |
STOC '03 | 270 | 80 | 30% |
STOC '02 | 287 | 91 | 32% |
STOC '01 | 230 | 83 | 36% |
STOC '00 | 182 | 85 | 47% |
STOC '98 | 169 | 75 | 44% |
STOC '97 | 211 | 75 | 36% |
STOC '96 | 201 | 74 | 37% |
STOC '89 | 196 | 56 | 29% |
STOC '88 | 192 | 53 | 28% |
STOC '87 | 165 | 50 | 30% |
STOC '80 | 125 | 47 | 38% |
STOC '79 | 111 | 37 | 33% |
STOC '78 | 120 | 38 | 32% |
STOC '77 | 87 | 31 | 36% |
STOC '76 | 83 | 30 | 36% |
STOC '75 | 87 | 31 | 36% |
STOC '74 | 95 | 35 | 37% |
STOC '71 | 50 | 23 | 46% |
STOC '70 | 70 | 27 | 39% |
Overall | 4,586 | 1,469 | 32% |