Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Applying a Transformative Justice Approach to Encourage the Participation of Black and Latina Girls in Computing

Published: 15 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Global protests and civil unrest in 2020 has renewed the world’s interest in addressing injustice due to structural racism and oppression toward Black and Latinx people in all aspects of society, including computing. In this article, we argue that to address and repair the harm created by institutions, policies, and practices that have systematically excluded Black and Latina girls from computer science, an intersectional, transformative justice approach must be taken. Leveraging testimonial authority, we share our past 8 years of experience designing, implementing, and studying Digital Youth Divas, a programmatic and systemic approach to encouraging middle school Black and Latina girls to participate in STEM. Specifically, we propose three principles to counter structural racism and oppression embedded in society and computing education: computing education must (1) address local histories of injustice by engaging community members; (2) counter negative stereotypes perpetuated in computer science by creating inclusive safe spaces and counter-narratives; and (3) build sustainable, computational capacity in communities. To illustrate each principle, we provide specific examples of the harm created by racist policies and systems and their effect on a specific community. We then describe our attempt to create counter structures and the subsequent outcomes for the girls, their families, and the community. This work contributes a framework for STEM and computing educators to integrate transformative justice as a method of repairing the harm that both society and the field of computing has and continues to cause Black and Latinx communities. We charge policy makers, educators, researchers, and community leaders to examine histories of oppression in their communities and to adopt holistic, transformative approaches that counter structural oppression at the individual and system level.

Supplementary Material

PDF File (3451345-vor.pdf)

References

[1]
BATJC. n.d. Bay Area Transformative Justice Collective: Building Transformative Justice Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Retrieved December 14, 2020 from https://batjc.wordpress.com/.
[2]
Daniel Aaronson, Daniel A. Hartley, and Bhashkar Mazumder. 2017. The effects of the 1930s HOLC “redlining” maps. Working Paper No. WP-2017-12. FRB of Chicago.
[3]
Michelle Alexander. 2010. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New Press.
[4]
Mariam Asad. 2019. Prefigurative design as a method for research justice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), Article 200, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359302
[5]
Catherine Ashcraft, Elizabeth K. Eger, and Kimberly A. Scott. 2017. Becoming technosocial change agents: Intersectionality and culturally responsive pedagogies as vital resources for increasing girls’ participation in computing. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 48, 3 (2017), 233–251.
[6]
Brigid Barron. 2006. Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development 49, 4 (2006), 193–224.
[7]
Ruha Benjamin. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Polity Press.
[8]
April Bernard. 2015. Transforming Justice, Transforming Lives: Women’s Pathways to Desistance from Crime. Lexington Books.
[9]
Jo Boaler. 2002. The development of disciplinary relationships: Knowledge, practice and identity in mathematics classrooms. For the Learning of Mathematics 22, 1 (2002), 42–47.
[10]
Quincy Brown. 2020. On Being Black In Computing During These Days. Retrieved August 24, 2021 from https://medium.com/@quincykbrown/on-being-black-in-computing-during-these-days-54e049d56987.
[11]
United States Census Bureau. 2020. 2019 American Housing Survey. Retrieved August 24, 2021 from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/ahs/data.html.
[12]
Patricia Hill Collins. 2000. Black Feminist Thought. Routledge.
[13]
Patricia Hill Collins. 2015. Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology 41, 1 (2015), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142
[14]
Patricia Hill Collins. 2019. Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory. Duke University Press.
[15]
Patricia Hill Collins and Sirma Bilge. 2016. Intersectionality. Polity Press.
[16]
Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[17]
Kimberle Crenshaw. 1993. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43 (1993), 1241.
[18]
Robin DiAngelo. 2018. White Fragility: Why It’s so Hard for White People to Talk about Racism. Beacon Press.
[19]
Jessa Dickinson, Jalon Arthur, Maddie Shiparski, Angalia Bianca, Alejandra Gonzalez, and Sheena Erete. 2021. Amplifying community-led violence prevention as a counter to structural oppression. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW (2021), 28.
[20]
Jessa Dickinson, Mark Díaz, Christopher A. Le Dantec, and Sheena Erete. 2019. “The cavalry ain’t coming in to save us” supporting capacities and relationships through civic tech. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1–21.
[21]
Ejeris Dixon and Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha. 2020. Beyond Survival: Strategies and Stories from the Transformative Justice. AK Press.
[22]
Kristie Dotson. 2011. Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia 26, 2 (2011), 236–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x
[23]
Rebecca Epstein, Jamilia Blake, and Thalia González. 2017. Girlhood interrupted: The erasure of Black girls’ childhood. SSRN. Retrieved August 24, 2021 from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3000695.
[24]
S. Erete, N. Pinkard, C. K. Martin, and J. Sandherr. 2015. Employing narratives to trigger interest in computational activities with inner-city girls. In Proceedings of Research in Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT’15). 1.
[25]
Sheena Erete, Naomi Thompson, Miranda Standberry-Wallace, Bo Ju, Denise Nacu, and Nichole Pinkard. 2021. Honoring black women’s work: Creating a parent and caring adult community to support youth STEAM engagement. In Proceedings of Research in Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT’21).
[26]
Sheena L. Erete, Nichole Pinkard, C. K. Martin, and A. Roberson. 2015. Digital narratives to engage girls in computational making. In Proceedings of the Intentional and Inclusive Design to Create Social-Technical Learning Systems Symposium at the Digital Media and Learning Conference.
[27]
Virginia Eubanks. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin’s Press.
[28]
Sarah Fox, Jill Dimond, Lilly Irani, Tad Hirsch, Michael Muller, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017. Social justice and design: Power and oppression in collaborative systems. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW’17 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3022201
[29]
generationFIVE. 2017. Ending Child Sexual Abuse: A Transformative Justice Handbook. Retrieved August 24, 2021 from http://www.generationfive.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Transformative-Justice-Handbook.pdf.
[30]
Phillip Atiba Goff, Matthew Christian Jackson, Brooke Allison Lewis Di Leone, Carmen Marie Culotta, and Natalie Ann DiTomasso. 2014. The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing black children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 106, 4 (2014), 526.
[31]
Rachel Alicia Griffin. 2012. I AM an angry Black woman: Black feminist autoethnography, voice, and resistance. Women’s Studies in Communication 35, 2 (2012), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2012.724524
[32]
Mark Guzdial. 2020. CS Teachers, It’s (Past) Time To Learn About Race. Retrieved August 24, 2021 from https://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/245408-cs-teachers-its-past-time-to-learn-about-race/fulltext#comments.
[33]
Jill V. Hamm and Hardin L. K. Coleman. 2001. African American and white adolescents’ strategies for managing cultural diversity in predominantly white high schools. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 30, 3 (2001), 281–303.
[34]
Sandra G. Harding. 2004. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader. Routledge.
[35]
Christina Harrington, Sheena Erete, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Deconstructing community-based collaborative design: Towards more equitable participatory design engagements. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), Article 216, 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359318
[36]
Christina N. Harrington. 2020. The forgotten margins: What is community-based participatory health design telling us? Interactions 27, 3 (April 2020), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386381
[37]
M. Kay Harris. 2004. An expansive, transformative view of restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review 7, 1 (2004), 117–141.
[38]
Abbe H. Herzig. 2002. Where have all the students gone? Participation of doctoral students in authentic mathematical activity as a necessary condition for persistence toward the PH. D. Educational Studies in Mathematics 50, 2 (2002), 177–212.
[39]
Walidah Imarisha, Alexis Gumbs, Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha, Adrienne Maree Brown, and Mia Mingus. 2017. The Fictions and Futures of Transformative Justice: A Conversation with the Authors of Octavia’s Brood. Retrieved December 14, 2020 from https://thenewinquiry.com/the-fictions-and-futures-of-transformative-justice/.
[40]
Danyelle T. Ireland, Kimberley Edelin Freeman, Cynthia E. Winston-Proctor, Kendra D. DeLaine, Stacey McDonald Lowe, and Kamilah M. Woodson. 2018. (Un) hidden figures: A synthesis of research examining the intersectional experiences of Black women and girls in STEM education. Review of Research in Education 42, 1 (2018), 226–254.
[41]
Mariame Kaba. 2021. We Do This ’ Til We Free Us: Abolitionist Organizing and Transforming Justice. Haymarket Books, Chicago, IL.
[42]
Ibram X. Kendi. 2017. Stamped from the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America. Random House.
[43]
Ibram X. Kendi. 2019. How to Be an Antiracist. One World/Ballantine.
[44]
Gloria Ladson-Billings. 1995. But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice 34, 3 (1995), 159–165.
[45]
Gloria Ladson-Billings. 1995. Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal 32, 3 (1995), 465–491.
[46]
Patricia A. Lauer, Motoko Akiba, Stephanie B. Wilkerson, Helen S. Apthorp, David Snow, and Mya L. Martin-Glenn. 2006. Out-of-school-time programs: A meta-analysis of effects for at-risk students. Review of Educational Research 76, 2 (2006), 275–313. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076002275
[47]
Carol D. Lee. 2003. Toward a framework for culturally responsive design in multimedia computer environments: Cultural modeling as a case. Mind, Culture, and Activity 10, 1 (2003), 42–61.
[48]
James L. Lewis, Holly Menzies, Edgar I. Nájera, and Reba N. Page. 2009. Rethinking trends in minority participation in the sciences. Science Education 93, 6 (2009), 961–977.
[49]
Alan Pelaez Lopez. n.d. The X in Latinx Is a Wound, Not a Trend. Retrieved August 24, 2021 from https://www.colorbloq.org/the-x-in-latinx-is-a-wound-not-a-trend.
[50]
Joseph L. Mahoney, Reed W. Larson, and Jacquelynne S. Eccles. 2005. Organized Activities as Contexts of Development: Extracurricular Activities, After School and Community Programs. Psychology Press.
[51]
Caitlin K. Martin, Nichole Pinkard, Sheena Erete, and Jim Sandherr. 2017. Connections at the family level: Supporting parents and caring adults to engage youth in learning about computers and technology. In Moving Students of Color from Consumers to Producers of Technology. IGI Global, 220–244.
[52]
Mia Mingus. n.d. Transformative Justice: A Brief Description. Retrieved December 14, 2020 fromhttps://transformharm.org/transformative-justice-a-brief-description/.
[53]
Ruth Morris. 2000. Stories of Transformative Justice. Canadian Scholars’ Press.
[54]
Safiya Umoja Noble. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press.
[55]
John U. Ogbu. 2003. Black American Students in an Affluent Suburb: A Study of Academic Disengagement. Routledge.
[56]
Maria Ong, Janet M. Smith, and Lily T. Ko. 2018. Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55, 2 (2018), 206–245.
[57]
Nichole Pinkard, Sheena Erete, Caitlin K. Martin, and Maxine McKinney de Royston. 2017. Digital Youth Divas: Exploring narrative-driven curriculum to spark middle school girls’ interest in computational activities. Journal of the Learning Sciences 26, 3 (2017), 477–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1307199
[58]
Baukje Prins. 2006. Narrative accounts of origins: A blind spot in the intersectional approach? European Journal of Women’s Studies 13, 3 (2006), 277–290.
[59]
Yolanda Rankin and Jakita Thomas. 2016. Moving Students of Color from Consumers to Producers of Technology. IGI Global.
[60]
Yolanda A. Rankin and Jakita O. Thomas. 2019. Straighten up and fly right: Rethinking intersectionality in HCI research. Interactions 26, 6 (Oct. 2019), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363033
[61]
Yolanda A. Rankin and Jakita O. Thomas. 2020. The intersectional experiences of Black women in computing. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’20). ACM, New York, NY, 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366873
[62]
Yolanda A. Rankin, Jakita O. Thomas, and Sheene Erete. 2021. Real talk: Saturated sites of violence in CS education. In Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group in Computer Science Education Technical Symposium. ACM, New York, NY.
[63]
Yolanda A. Rankin, Jakita O. Thomas, and Nicole M. Joseph. 2020. Intersectionality in HCI: Lost in translation. Interactions 27, 5 (2020), 68–71.
[64]
A. Roberson, C. K. Martin, N. Pinkard, and Sheena L. Erete. 2015. Flip the switch: Generating girls’ interest in STEM through E-fashion. In Proceedings of the International Society for Technology in Education.
[65]
Morris E. Robinson. 1997. A Place We Can Call Our Home: The Emerging Black Community Circa, 1850–1930. ME Robinson.
[66]
Ari Schlesinger, W. Keith Edwards, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging identity through gender, race, and class. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’17). ACM, New York, NY, 5412–5427. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025766
[67]
Juliet B. Schor. 2017. Does the sharing economy increase inequality within the eighty percent? Findings from a qualitative study of platform providers. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 10, 2 (2017), 263–279.
[68]
Allison Scott. 2017. Tech Leavers Study: A First-of-Its-Kind Analysis of Why People Voluntarily Left Jobs in Tech. Kapor Center for Social Impact.
[69]
Jakita O. Thomas, Nicole Joseph, Arian Williams, Chanrtel Crum, and Jamika Burge. 2018. Speaking truth to power: Exploring the intersectional experiences of Black women in computing. In Proceedings of Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT’18). https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2018.8491718
[70]
Kentaro Toyama. 2015. Geek Heresy: Rescuing Social Change from the Cult of Technology. PublicAffairs.
[71]
Jackie Wang. 2018. Carceral Capitalism. Vol. 21. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[72]
Debbie Weekes. 2003. Keeping it in the community: Creating safe spaces for black girlhood. Community, Work & Family 6, 1 (2003), 47–61.
[73]
Andrew Wiese. 1999. Black housing, white finance: African American housing and home ownership in Evanston, Illinois, before 1940. Journal of Social History 33, 2 (1999), 429–460.
[74]
Tiffani Williams. 2020. ‘Underrepresented Minority’ Considered Harmful, Racist Language.” Retrieved August 24, 2021 from https://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/245710-underrepresented-minority-considered-harmful-racist-language/fulltext#comments.
[75]
Marisol Wong-Villacres, Aakash Gautam, Wendy Roldan, Lucy Pei, Jessa Dickinson, Azra Ismail, Betsy DiSalvo, et al. 2020. From needs to strengths: Operationalizing an assets-based design of technology. In Proceedings of the Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 527–535.
[76]
Marisol Wong-Villacres, Arkadeep Kumar, Aditya Vishwanath, Naveena Karusala, Betsy DiSalvo, and Neha Kumar. 2018. Designing for intersections. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS’18). 45–58.
[77]
Justin Worland. 2020. America’s long overdue awakening to systemic racism. Time.
[78]
Ryoko Yamaguchi and Jamika D. Burge. 2019. Intersectionality in the narratives of Black women in computing through the education and workforce pipeline. Journal for Multicultural Education 13, 3 (2019), 215–235.
[79]
Richard L. Zweigenhaft and G. William Domhoff. 1993. Blacks in the White Establishment? A Study of Race and Class in America. Yale University Press.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Computing Education Interventions to Increase Gender Equity from 2000 to 2020: A Systematic Literature ReviewReview of Educational Research10.3102/00346543241241536Online publication date: 29-Apr-2024
  • (2024)How to combine criticality with reflection? Scaffolding children's critical reflection in the case of anti-bullying interventionsProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685354(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Participatory design that matters – with activism education of childrenProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666108(221-233)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Applying a Transformative Justice Approach to Encourage the Participation of Black and Latina Girls in Computing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
      ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 21, Issue 4
      December 2021
      290 pages
      EISSN:1946-6226
      DOI:10.1145/3487991
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 15 October 2021
      Accepted: 01 June 2021
      Revised: 01 April 2021
      Received: 01 July 2020
      Published in TOCE Volume 21, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Black
      2. girls
      3. women
      4. Latina
      5. STEM
      6. computing
      7. transformative justice
      8. intersectionality

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Refereed

      Funding Sources

      • National Science Foundation
      • U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, Multidisciplinary Program in Education Sciences

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)429
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)32
      Reflects downloads up to 17 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Computing Education Interventions to Increase Gender Equity from 2000 to 2020: A Systematic Literature ReviewReview of Educational Research10.3102/00346543241241536Online publication date: 29-Apr-2024
      • (2024)How to combine criticality with reflection? Scaffolding children's critical reflection in the case of anti-bullying interventionsProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685354(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Participatory design that matters – with activism education of childrenProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666108(221-233)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Community Is Critical TooCommunications of the ACM10.1145/365198267:5(40-42)Online publication date: 1-May-2024
      • (2024)"For Us By Us": Intentionally Designing Technology for Lived Black ExperiencesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661535(3210-3224)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
      • (2024)Designing for Dissensus: Socially Engaged Art to access experience and support participation.Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661516(2851-2865)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
      • (2024)Transformative agency – the next step towards children's computational empowermentProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655806(322-337)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
      • (2024)"I Got Flagged for Supposed Bullying, Even Though It Was in Response to Someone Harassing Me About My Disability.": A Study of Blind TikTokers’ Content Moderation ExperiencesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642148(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)Bridging cultures and computing: Exploring the relationship between Appalachian problem solving and computational thinkingJournal of Research on Technology in Education10.1080/15391523.2024.2399257(1-17)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
      • (2024) World‐Making Through a Feminist Abolitionist Lens in a STEAM Middle School Program Reading Research Quarterly10.1002/rrq.53259:3(257-281)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2024
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media