Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
In the first century CE Jewish identity was defined in a context of significant religious diversity. This presents those who read Paul’s Letters with a problem: how to locate Paul’s thought within the complicated matrices of Jewish... more
In the first century CE Jewish identity was defined in a context of significant religious diversity. This presents those who read Paul’s Letters with a problem: how to locate Paul’s thought within the complicated matrices of Jewish intellectual traditions of this period. This study locates Paul within the matrix of Jewish messianic thought between the second century BCE and the first ccentury CE by comparing conceptual elements of messianic traditions in the Parables of Enoch and the undisputed Letters of Paul. Comparative analysis of the nature and functions of the messiah figures in the Parables and the Letters of Paul demonstrates a remarkable combination of shared elements, indicating that Paul was familiar with the Enochic messiah traditions. The extraordinary combination of shared elements is so striking as to preclude the possibility that the Parables and Paul constituted independent developments. The evidence indicates that Paul developed his concept of the Kyrios out of the Enochic Son of Man traditions, or that Paul was at least influenced by these traditions.
Research Interests:
Gnosticism, Cognitive Science, Jewish Law, Jewish Law, Jewish Studies, and 84 more
The Parables of Enoch is one of the most extraordinary sources for our understanding of the development of Jewish thought in the Second Temple period. This is the first Jewish text to have as its protagonist a messiah figure that is both... more
The Parables of Enoch is one of the most extraordinary sources for our understanding of the development of Jewish thought in the Second Temple period. This is the first Jewish text to have as its protagonist a messiah figure that is both heavenly and human, a messiah figure that is also given the divine function of universal judgment. But the Parables also suggest that those who were responsible for its composition and redaction were members of an ecstatic scribal community. This paper will explore evidence in the Parables indicating the practice of a community of Enochic scribes who were open to ecstatic, revelatory experiences that directly informed their understanding and use of wisdom.
"The Enochic Son of Man and Pauline Christology" A comparative analysis of the Messiah in the Book of the Parables of Enoch and the Letters of Paul, this study locates one aspect of Paul’s thought, his christology, in the context of... more
"The Enochic Son of Man and Pauline Christology"

A comparative analysis of the Messiah in the Book of the Parables of Enoch and the Letters of Paul, this study locates one aspect of Paul’s thought, his christology, in the context of Jewish intellectual traditions of the first century BCE and the first century CE. Conceptual elements of messianic traditions are identified in these documents by examining the nature and functions of the divine figure and the nature and functions of the messiah figure. This has implications for understanding divine and human agency and the relationships between mediatorial figures and the one God in Jewish literature from the Second Temple period. Comparative analysis demonstrates that the Book of the Parables and the Letters of Paul share specific conceptual elements of messianic traditions. The combination of shared elements is so striking as to preclude the possibility that the Book of the Parables and the Letters of Paul constituted independent, parallel developments. The evidence indicates that Paul was familiar with the conceptual elements of the Enochic messiah, and that Paul developed his concept of Jesus as the Kyrios out of the Son of Man traditions in the Book of the Parables of Enoch. This study argues that at least one facet of Paul’s thought, his christology, was heavily influenced by Enochic Son of Man traditions.
Intertextual links between First Enoch and the Gospel of Matthew have been widely recognized for over a century. These connections suggest conceptual relationships regarding messianic beliefs both in terms of their difference and their... more
Intertextual links between First Enoch and the Gospel of Matthew have been widely recognized for over a century. These connections suggest conceptual relationships regarding messianic beliefs both in terms of their difference and their similarities. To understand these intertextual relationships between the Enoch literature and Matthew, one must also include Paul’s views of the messiah, developed in the period between the Book of the Parables of Enoch and the composition of the Gospels. Older critical approaches to Pauline christology once drove a wedge between Paul’s views of a crucified and risen messiah as Apostle to the Gentiles and the kinds of Jewish intellectual messianic traditions we have in First Enoch and Matthew. More recent critical approaches have a renewed appreciation for reading Paul in his Jewish context. This study explores the connections between First Enoch, Paul, and the Gospel of Matthew by examining these three messianic systems on the basis of both intertextuality and conceptual developments of Jewish messianic belief in the first century CE.
Research Interests:
""In the first century CE Jewish identity was defined in a context of significant religious diversity. This presents those who read Paul’s Letters with a problem: how to locate Paul’s thought within the complicated matrix of Jewish... more
""In the first century CE Jewish identity was defined in a context of significant religious diversity. This presents those who read Paul’s Letters with a problem: how to locate Paul’s thought within the complicated matrix of Jewish intellectual traditions of this period. A comparative analysis of the Messiah in the Book of the Parables of Enoch and the Letters of Paul, this study locates one aspect of Paul’s thought, his christology, in the context of Jewish intellectual traditions of the first century CE.

Conceptual elements of messianic traditions are identified in these documents by examining the nature and functions of the divine figure and the nature and functions of the messiah figure. This has implications for understanding divine and human agency and the relationships between mediatorial figures and the one God in Jewish literature from the Second Temple period. The literature demonstrates a complex variety of expressions for describing interactions between the divine figure and all other created beings.

Comparative analysis demonstrates that the Book of the Parables and the Letters of Paul share specific conceptual elements of messianic traditions. The combination of shared elements is so striking as to preclude the possibility that the Book of the Parables and the Letters of Paul constituted independent, parallel developments. It cannot be claimed, however, that Paul was familiar with the text of the Book of the Parables; there are no direct quotes of the Book of the Parables anywhere in Paul’s Letters. We can say, however, that Paul was familiar with the conceptual elements of the Enochic messiah, and that Paul developed his concept of the Kyrios out of the Son of Man traditions in the Book of the Parables of Enoch. This study argues that at least one facet of Paul’s thought, his christology, was heavily influenced by Enochic Son of Man traditions.""
“The Shadow and the Substance: Early Reception of Paul the Jew in the Letter to the Colossians.” The Early Reception of Paul the Second Temple Jew: Text, Narrative and Reception History. Isaac Oliver and Gabriele Boccaccini, editors. The... more
“The Shadow and the Substance: Early Reception of Paul the Jew in the Letter to the Colossians.” The Early Reception of Paul the Second Temple Jew: Text, Narrative and Reception History. Isaac Oliver and Gabriele Boccaccini, editors. The Library of Second Temple Studies 92. Lester Grabbe, editor. London: Bloomsbury T.&T. Clark, 2018. 75–87.
Research Interests:
This essay explores messiah traditions in Second Temple Judaism and their connection to messiah traditions of the early church. Much of the essay is given to a critique of Daniel Boyarin's book, The Jewish Gospels: The Story of the Jewish... more
This essay explores messiah traditions in Second Temple Judaism and their connection to messiah traditions of the early church. Much of the essay is given to a critique of Daniel Boyarin's book, The Jewish Gospels: The Story of the Jewish Christ (New York: New Press, 2012).
This paper explores examples of satire in the Hebrew Bible and how interpretation and meaning of these narratives changed over time.
Traces the development of Jewish ideas about judgment and afterlife, beginning with pre-exilic traditions in the Torah, apocalyptic ideations and other traditions during the Second Temple period, Rabbinic views from late antiquity into... more
Traces the development of Jewish ideas about judgment and afterlife, beginning with pre-exilic traditions in the Torah, apocalyptic ideations and other traditions during the Second Temple period, Rabbinic views from late antiquity into the medieval period, and today.
The Second Temple period witnessed a remarkable diversity of biblical (Torah) interpretation. This paper offers a brief survey of biblical history leading up to and including the Second Temple period. The paper then offers three examples... more
The Second Temple period witnessed a remarkable diversity of biblical (Torah) interpretation. This paper offers a brief survey of biblical history leading up to and including the Second Temple period. The paper then offers three examples of diverse biblical interpretations in Zadokite and Enochic priestly and scribal communities with an examination of texts that touch on the liturgical calendar from this period, the biblical figures Adam and Eve, and divergent traditions about the flood. This paper was the annual Philip Markowicz Lecture on Jewish Biblical Studies, a public lecture delivered at the University of Toledo's Law School auditorium on 25 October 2010. It was the second lecture in the 2010-2011 series from the UT Initiative for Religious Understanding.
Recent analysis has attempted to locate the Infancy Gospel of Thomas (IGT) in a context of developing Christian thought about Jesus’ childhood, and has suggested that the author(s) imitated a popular children’s stories genre of late... more
Recent analysis has attempted to locate the Infancy Gospel of Thomas (IGT) in a context of developing Christian thought about Jesus’ childhood, and has suggested that the author(s) imitated a popular children’s stories genre of late antiquity. The function of this genre, when applied to the infancy of Jesus, is to embellish the status of Jesus in terms of his power, wisdom, and authority. What appears to be an earlier strand of tradition in IGT, however, suggests an ideological stance that is much less complimentary of Jesus and raises a number of questions about its original context and purpose.
Research Interests: