Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Research Interests:
Diplomatic History, International Relations, Austria (European History), Early Modern History, Habsburg Studies, and 48 more
Resumen Atendiendo al título del presente ensayo, surgen los siguientes interrogantes: ¿en qué medida reflejó el empleo y difusión de la lengua castellana en la corte imperial el influjo de la política española? ¿Qué impacto tuvo su... more
Resumen
Atendiendo al título del presente ensayo, surgen los siguientes interrogantes: ¿en qué medida reflejó el empleo y difusión de la lengua castellana en la corte imperial el influjo de la política española? ¿Qué impacto tuvo su presencia en las relaciones bilaterales a mediados del siglo XVII? ¿Constituyó la lengua un rasgo distintivo de la identidad común de los Habsburgo durante la Edad Moderna? Este artículo pretende dar respuesta a estas y otras cuestiones desde un enfoque esencialmente político. Se plantean como objetivos principales formular algunas reflexiones y profundizar acerca del ascendiente lingüístico proyectado por las dos cortes principales de la Casa de Austria en sus relaciones bilaterales alrededor de la crisis dinástica derivada de la Paz de Westfalia en 1648.

Résumé - «Esto me suena a tudesco» : la langue comme mesure d’influence réciproque dans les relations bilatérales entre Madrid et Vienne au milieu du xviie siècle.
Cette contribution entend répondre aux questions suivantes : dans quelle
mesure l’emploi et la diffusion de la langue castillane au sein de la cour impériale reflètent-ils l’influence de la politique espagnole ? Quel fut l’impact de la présence de cette langue dans les relations bilatérales entre le Saint-Empire et la monarchie espagnole au milieu du xviie siècle ? La langue constitue-t-elle un trait distinctif de l’identité commune des Habsbourg à l’époque moderne ? Ces questions seront examinées depuis une perspective essentiellement politique. Notre objectif principal est d’approfondir l’examen des phénomènes d’ascendant linguistique dans les relations entre les deux cours principales de la Maison d’Autriche autour de la crise dynastique issue de la paix de Westphalie en 1648.
La repercusión que la Paz de Westfalia tuvo sobre los vínculos dinásticos entre España y la línea secundaria del Tirol no ha llamado hasta el momento la necesaria atención de los historiadores modernistas. El análisis de los puntos clave... more
La repercusión que la Paz de Westfalia tuvo sobre los vínculos dinásticos entre España y la línea secundaria del Tirol no ha llamado hasta el momento la necesaria atención de los historiadores modernistas. El análisis de los puntos clave que jalonaron estas relaciones desde 1648 resulta clave a la hora de abordar y comprender las motivaciones y expectativas de la corona española respecto del Tirol en un contexto de aguda crisis dinástica y divergencias político-estratégicas. Esta tensión dominante, nutrida por la marginalización de los intereses de la casa archiducal por Madrid y Viena, solo se disiparía con el advenimiento en 1659 de la Paz de los Pirineos.

The impact that the Peace of Westphalia had on the dynastic bonds between Spain and the secondary Tyrolean line has not yet drawn the necessary attention of Early Modern historians. The analysis of the focal points that marked these relations since 1648 is key when it comes to addressing and understanding the motivations and expectations of the Spanish crown with respect to the Tyrol in a context of acute dynastic crisis and political-strategic divergences. This dominant tension, nourished by the marginalization of the archducal house’s interests by Madrid and Vienna, would only dissipate with the advent in 1659 of the Peace of the Pyrenees.
To some extent, the Thirty Years’ War began as a challenge to the authority of the House of Austria, and such a crisis of power was immediately felt at the Imperial Court. As the war marked the severe economic and political weakness of... more
To some extent, the Thirty Years’ War began as a challenge to the authority of the House of Austria, and such a crisis of power was immediately felt at the Imperial Court. As the war marked the severe economic and political weakness of Ferdinand II (1619-1637), his three main allies -- the Duke of Bavaria, the Spanish King and the Pope held a very influential position at the Viennese Court. Contemporary Protestant propaganda and traditional German historiography since Schiller have blamed the Emperor because he was unable to carry out a “national policy”. Instead, Ferdinand II was controlled by foreign interests and was a pawn of the larger plans of Catholic imposition and Spanish hegemony. Nuncios and especially Spanish bribed the ministers of Ferdinand II and Ferdinand III (1637-1657) as a means of monitoring imperial policy-making. Viennese high courtiers developed a crucial role as chief advisers and maintained fluid contacts with other Catholic courts. Notwithstanding, the real mechanics of decision-making were more complex. The courtiers were not only concerned with the choices of foreign policy; they also had more powerful family, religious, and regional constraints. Consequently, underneath the general label of a Catholic or Spanish faction, the courtiers built dynamic groupings whose nature and methods of self-preservation will be analysed here.
At the time of the arrival in Vienna of Emperor Leopold I's bride, Philip IV's young daughter Margarita Teresa, in 1666, Spanish diplomatic influence at the Imperial court had irredeemably lost the weight it had enjoyed in earlier... more
At the time of the arrival in Vienna  of Emperor Leopold I's bride, Philip IV's young daughter Margarita  Teresa, in 1666, Spanish diplomatic influence at the Imperial court had irredeemably lost the weight it had enjoyed in earlier times. Nevertheless, the Imperial Court witnessed a significant revival of Spanish influence through culture. The appeal of Spanish culture thanks to the magnetism of  the new empress was reflected in many spheres of court life such as theater, literature, and even architecture. Moreover, there was  renewed, widespread  interest in learning the language of the senior line of the Habsburgs  among the court aristocracy.
All these manifestations were, in parallel to the diplomatic dimension, another tangible reflection of Vienna’s continued expectations for a Habsburg succession to the Spanish throne.
With the arrival in 1631 of Emperor Ferdinand III’s bride to Vienna, the infanta Maria Anna, the “Spanish party” at the Imperial court gained a remarkable momentum. At the time, Philip IV’s interests found a key ally in the person of his... more
With the arrival in 1631 of Emperor Ferdinand III’s bride to Vienna, the infanta Maria Anna, the “Spanish party” at the Imperial court gained a remarkable momentum. At the time, Philip IV’s interests found a key ally in the person of his sister, who, along with her influential confessor Diego de Quiroga, exerted an indisputable influence over the direction of Imperial issues for the following decades. Nevertheless, the empress’s untimely death, as well as the consequential return of Quiroga to the Peninsula, seriously undermined Spain’s interests and had a negative impact on the outcome of the Peace of Westphalia. In addition, the situation was further exacerbated by a sharp drop in the means to fund a long list of pensioners
and collaborators of the Spanish Crown. With a weakened party lacking leadership, the Spanish ambassador, within his recovered prominence, promoted the rise of a new figure as guarantor of Madrid’s interests: the count of Auersperg, a powerful minister which would hold a leading position in Ferdinand III’s government. Madrid, however, risked a great deal by focusing his support on a too ambitious a candidate with plenty of enemies. The rupture in 1656 between Auersperg and the Catholic ambassador implied a serious jeopardy for the Madrid’s position, in a very sensitive period regarding the survival of the Spanish Monarchy.
Research Interests: