Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Jaco Gericke
  • 100 Deo Exulto
    10 Celery Street
    Annlin
    0082
    Pretoria
    South Africa
  • +27720247134
The aim of the conference is to critically investigate the paradigm of axial age and other theories that maintain that Second Order Thinking in the Mediterranean world only arose with classical Greek culture. We wish to discuss whether or... more
The aim of the conference is to critically investigate the paradigm of axial age and other theories that maintain that Second Order Thinking in the Mediterranean world only arose with classical Greek culture. We wish to discuss whether or not a kind of philosophical thinking was present before and concurrently with the Greeks in the cultures of ancient Egypt, Israel, and Mesopotamia, and if so, to determine the underlying systems that governed it. The conference schedule will include four main sections: (I) Philosophy and the Axial Age, (II) the discipline of Philosophy and the Hebrew Bible and the Ancient Near East, (III) Epistemology, (IV) Ethics and Metaphysics.
Research Interests:
Religion, Ancient Egyptian Religion, Comparative Religion, History, Ancient History, and 72 more
Dear Fellow SBL/AAR Scholars, I wanted to make you aware of the "Hebrew Bible and Philosophy" program unit which focuses on philosophical content in the biblical literature. You can find out more about this program unit and research in... more
Dear Fellow SBL/AAR Scholars,

I wanted to make you aware of the "Hebrew Bible and Philosophy" program unit which focuses on philosophical content in the biblical literature. You can find out more about this program unit and research in this field at our blog. In San Antonio, both sessions are on Monday, back-to-back. Please consider joining us and/or passing along this information to yours colleagues who might be interested.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
11/23/2015 9:00 AM to 11:30 AM Room: Inman (Atlanta Conference Level) – HyattTheme: Philosophical Criticism as a Form of Biblical Criticism Jaco Gericke, North-West University (South Africa) Analytic vs. Continental Varieties of... more
11/23/2015
9:00 AM to 11:30 AM
Room: Inman (Atlanta Conference Level) – HyattTheme: Philosophical Criticism as a Form of Biblical Criticism

Jaco Gericke, North-West University (South Africa)
Analytic vs. Continental Varieties of Philosophical Criticism (30 min)

Mark Sneed, Lubbock Christian University
A Response to Jaco Gericke’s Thesis in The Hebrew Bible and Philosophy of Religion (30 min)
Oliver Crisp, Fuller Theological Seminary
An Analytic Theologian’s Response to Jaco Gericke’s Thesis (30 min)

Craig Bartholomew, Redeemer University College
A Biblical Theologian’s Response to Philosophical Criticism (30 min)

Discussion (30 min)
Research Interests:
CFP Deadline: March 5, 2015 1) Our first session will consist of invited papers responding to the Jaco Gericke’s central idea found in The Hebrew Bible and Philosophy of Religion: Philosophical criticism as a form of biblical criticism.... more
CFP Deadline: March 5, 2015

1) Our first session will consist of invited papers responding to the Jaco Gericke’s central idea found in The Hebrew Bible and Philosophy of Religion:  Philosophical criticism as a form of biblical criticism. Those invited speakers include:

1. Jaco Gericke (North-West University, South Africa)
2. Oliver Crisp (Fuller Theological Seminary)
3. Mark Sneed (Lubbock Christian University)
4. Eleonore Stump (St. Louis University)

2) The second session is an open call for papers that propose to examine specific biblical texts or the Hebrew Bible as a whole for philosophical content:
The Hebrew Bible and Philosophy unit will be hosting two sessions: 1) invited papers from scholars of bible, theology, and philosophy examining the basis for philosophical criticism of Hebrew Bible, and 2) an open call for papers that propose to examine specific biblical texts or the Hebrew Bible as a whole for philosophical content. Preference will be given to proposals that consider neglected philosophical sub-disciplines in Hebrew Bible scholarship (e.g., metaphysics, logic/rationality, epistemology, philosophy of religion).
Research Interests:
HEBREW BIBLE AND PHILOSOPHY Jaco Gericke Andrew Johnson Description: This unit is concerned with the problems, potential, possibilities and prospects of philosophical perspectives on the Hebrew Bible. The aim is to discuss the... more
HEBREW BIBLE AND PHILOSOPHY
Jaco Gericke
Andrew Johnson

Description: This unit is concerned with the problems, potential, possibilities and prospects of philosophical perspectives on the Hebrew Bible. The aim is to discuss the relationship between the Hebrew Bible and Philosophy as well as textual contents related to various topics in previously largely neglected philosophical sub-fields, e.g. metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of religion, etc.

Call for papers: This unit is of the consultation type which will only have a regular call for papers before the general deadline in 2015-16. In 2014 the chairs and steering committee members will take initiative in organizing sessions with papers on a number of topics related to the Hebrew Bible and Philosophy as outlined in the description above.
Research Interests:
This book will have two faces. On the one hand, following in the tradition of theologies of the Old Testament it hopes to offer a larger perspective on themes related to Yahweh as represented in the biblical texts. On the other hand, it... more
This book will have two faces. On the one hand, following in the tradition of theologies of the Old Testament it hopes to offer a larger perspective on themes related to Yahweh as represented in the biblical texts. On the other hand, it will be the first philosophical theology of the Old Testament in that it will deal with specific  issues found in that discipline, to the extent that these were also presupposed to be problems in different forms in different Old Testament texts, e.g. the nature of Yhwh as well as issues related to divine power, knowledge, presence, goodness, eternity, creation, etc. Though the topics are borrowed from Christian philosophical theology, they will be discussed descriptively and philosophically with reference to what the related concepts in the Old Testament themselves involve. The aim is not to justify or criticize the associated biblical contents but to reconstruct the philosophical-type reflection that selected texts featuring these concepts can be shown to presuppose for them in order to have taken the form they did. This despite the fact that in their current rhetorical location the format is not as such philosophical anymore. So just as the Old Testament is not a textbook of theology and contain more than one theological perspective on related things, so it is not one of philosophical theology, even though the issues discussed in the latter discipline can be redescribed with reference to what, if anything, Old Testament texts themselves can be said to presuppose as similarly problematic. This not because such a publication is very urgent or considered important for any higher purpose but simply because it would have been considered impossible just a little while ago and also out of interest as to what might turn up if one tries to do it, with a discussion of the obstacle involved included. It should therefore be of interest, no matter the reader's own personal beliefs, although given how the latter influences one's view of what is (supposed to be in the Bible), they might differ as regards particular interpretations. Which is fine.
Research Interests:
Religion, Comparative Religion, Hebrew Literature, Mythology, Philosophy, and 43 more
In this book Jaco Gericke is concerned with different ways of approaching the question of what, according to the Hebrew Bible, a god was assumed to be. As a supplement to the tradition of predominantly linguistic, historical, literary,... more
In this book Jaco Gericke is concerned with different ways of approaching the question of what, according to the Hebrew Bible, a god was assumed to be. As a supplement to the tradition of predominantly linguistic, historical, literary, comparative, social-scientific and related ways of looking at the research problem, Gericke offers a variety of experimental philosophical perspectives that aim to take a step back from the scholarly discussion as it has unfolded hirtheto in order to provide a new type of worry when looking at the riddle of what the biblical texts assumed made a god divine. Consisting of a brief history of philosophical interpretations of the concepts of whatness and essence from Socrates to Derrida, the relevant ideas of each thinker are adapted and reapplied to look at some interesting metaphysical oddities arising from generic uses of elohim/el/ eloah as common noun in the Hebrew Bible. As such the study seeks to be a prolegomenon to all future research in that, instead of answering the question regarding a supposed nature of divinity, it aims to complicate it beyond expectation. In this way a case is made for a more nuanced and indeterminate manner of constructing the problem of what it meant to call something a god.
Research Interests:
Religion, Comparative Religion, Philosophy, Metaphysics, Philosophy Of Religion, and 47 more
This book will feature a collection of published and reworked essays on Qohelet in religion to metaphysics, axiology, epistemology, meta-ethics, comparative philosophy of religion, the history of philosophical exegesis of the book, the... more
This book will feature a collection of published and reworked essays on Qohelet in religion to metaphysics, axiology, epistemology, meta-ethics, comparative philosophy of religion, the history of philosophical exegesis of the book, the deconstruction of solar mythology in the text, etc.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
This study pioneers the use of philosophy of religion in the study of the Hebrew Bible. After identifying the need for a legitimate philosophical approach to Israelite religion, the volume traces the history of interdisciplinary relations... more
This study pioneers the use of philosophy of religion in the study of the Hebrew Bible. After identifying the need for a legitimate philosophical approach to Israelite religion, the volume traces the history of interdisciplinary relations and shows how descriptive varieties of philosophy of religion can aid the clarification of the Hebrew Bible’s own metaphysical, epistemological, and moral assumptions. Two new interpretative methodologies are developed and subsequently applied through an introduction to what the biblical texts took for granted about the nature of religious language, the concept of deity, the properties of Yhwh, the existence of gods, religious epistemology, and the relation between religion and morality.
In the book of Job, there are nine texts where the character of Job is depicted as using the words »I know« (Heb. ידעתי ). Job is moreover the only character constructed as making first-person knowledge claims of a very specific kind. The... more
In the book of Job, there are nine texts where the character of Job is depicted as using the words »I know« (Heb. ידעתי ). Job is moreover the only character constructed as making first-person knowledge claims of a very specific kind. The texts in question, however, are somewhat randomly distributed throughout the dialogues, appearing in contexts with variable contents and occur alongside numerous other configurations of the same verb in the words of both Job and other characters. This state of affairs partly explains why the associated religious language has up to now not been isolated and analysed from a comparative religious-epistemological perspective. Consequently, the original contribution of this article involves adopting the idiom of analytic epistemology of religion with the aim of clarifying some of the concepts that Job's claims to know have in common with current research on the epistemology of religious disagreement.
The concept of knowledge plays an important role in Qoheleth. Both linguistic and philosophical perspectives remain popular trends in current related research. Developments in the two auxiliary disciplines that remain largely ignored... more
The concept of knowledge plays an important role in Qoheleth. Both linguistic and philosophical perspectives remain popular trends in current related research. Developments in the two auxiliary disciplines that remain largely ignored include those associated with “Epistemic Contextualism.” The theory has been used as both a substantive-epistemological and a descriptive-semantic thesis, both of which concern the way variable epistemic standards are seen to supervene in different contexts of knowledge attributions. Initially offered as a solution to the challenges of radical scepticism, it has recently sought to show how an utterance affirming and denying a subject “knows” that something is the case could both be meaningful in virtue of changing propositional contents expressed in response to variable contextual stakes, interests, and needs. The original contribution of this study lies in constructing the relevant data set in Qoheleth and illustrating the possibilities and problems of applying the semantic format of the theory to discrepant propositional attitude reports in the world of the text.
The complex relations between Hebrew Bible interpretation and the discipline of the Philosophy of Religion were last discussed in detail a decade ago (Gericke 2012). In the years that followed, the associated literature was seen as... more
The complex relations between Hebrew Bible interpretation and the discipline of the Philosophy of Religion were last discussed in detail a decade ago (Gericke 2012). In the years that followed, the associated literature was seen as samples of a recent return to philosophy of religion as auxiliary discourse, albeit one that had yet to obtain a clear research profile (Schmid 2019). Shortly thereafter, evidence of a variety of philosophical approaches to the HB/OT as a distinct emergent current was provided (Keefer 2022). The original contribution of this article and its objective is to supplement and complement the related research by way of an update on the relations between the Bible and Philosophy with special attention to Philosophy of Religion.
In this article, a supplementary yet original contribution is made to the ongoing attempts at refining ways of comparative-philosophical conceptual clarification of Qohelet’s claim that הבל הכל in 1:2 (and 12:8). Adopting and adapting the... more
In this article, a supplementary yet original contribution is made to the ongoing attempts at refining ways of comparative-philosophical conceptual clarification of Qohelet’s claim that הבל הכל in 1:2 (and 12:8). Adopting and adapting the latest analytic metaphysical concerns and
categories for descriptive purposes only, a distinction is made between הבל as property of הכל and the properties of הבל in relation to הכל . Involving both correlation and contrast, the second-order language framework is hereby extended to a level of advanced nuance and specificity for restating the meaning of the book’s first-order language on its own terms, even if not in them.
Research Interests:
This study takes as its starting point the consensus in research on the relationship between divine attributes and suffering in Psalm 89 which holds that some of the beliefs expressed in verses 39-52 contradict those in 1-38(53). In an... more
This study takes as its starting point the consensus in research on the relationship between divine attributes and suffering in Psalm 89 which holds that some of the beliefs expressed in verses 39-52 contradict those in 1-38(53). In an attempt to address a related gap in the research in a new and supplementary way, a comparativephilosophical perspective is offered regarding the reasoning operative within the Psalm's associated religious language. As counterpart, the so-called "Logical Problem of Evil" (LPE) in analytic philosophy of religion was identified. Conceptual and correlation-relations in Psalm 89 are clarified through correlation and contrast. The study argues that the logical status of the beliefs involved, as contradiction, makes more sense if interpreted as part of the protocol when prayer and poetry have to satisfy the conditions of a possible atheodicy. Thus, restating the Psalm's associated content on its own terms, even if not in them, contributes to our understanding of why certain states of *
According to popular consensus, the ancient Israelites shunned natural theology and belief in Yahweh was based on revelation and not reason. In relatively recent times, this view has come under increasing pressure as the presence of... more
According to popular consensus, the ancient Israelites shunned natural theology and belief in Yahweh was based on revelation and not reason. In relatively recent times, this view has come under increasing pressure as the presence of natural theology in the Hebrew Bible has turned into a topic of sporadic interest. In this article, a contribution to this discussion is made by way of placing the topic in its proper framework within the philosophy of religion. In doing so, it provides a descriptive introduction to what will for the foreseen future remain a controversial issue.
Nietzsche’s writings on the Old Testament have been the subject of in-depth research in various academic disciplines. This article’s original contribution to the ongoing discussion lies in its exclusive focus on Nietzsche’s philosophical... more
Nietzsche’s writings on the Old Testament have been the subject of in-depth research in various academic disciplines. This article’s original contribution to the ongoing discussion lies in its exclusive focus on Nietzsche’s philosophical reception of Genesis 2:4b–3:24 in particular. The objective is to provide an extensive overview of the related data by way of thematically correlated representative samples in the philosopher’s German writings. As background, the relevant aspects of Schopenhauer’s reception of Genesis 2:4b–3:24 are noted before identifying two types of philosophical criticism discernible in Nietzsche’s consistent and frequent recourse to the text’s memorable mythological motifs. Based on the sheer quantity and quality of associated content involved, the study concludes that Nietzsche’s critical and creative interactions with Genesis 2:4b–3:24 represent
Research Interests:
Recourse to auxiliary disciplines has greatly contributed to the ways in which biblical scholars seek to elucidate various dimensions of meaning in textual constructions of dreams and dreaming in the Old Testament. The original... more
Recourse to auxiliary disciplines has greatly contributed to the ways in which biblical scholars seek to elucidate various dimensions of meaning in textual constructions of dreams and dreaming in the Old Testament. The original contribution this article hopes to make to the ongoing research on associated oneirocritic topoi is to propose the so-called philosophy of dreaming as a potential dialogue partner to supplement already available perspectives within the multidisciplinary discussion. At present, there is no descriptive philosophical approach exclusively devoted to the identification and clarification of the folk-philosophical assumptions implicit in oneirocritic materials as conditions of their possibility. By way of comparative-philosophical commentary, the article features a brief introduction to the related research within Old Testament studies, an overview of the history and problems of the auxiliary subject,
and an illustration of how the new approach might look when applied to texts involving ‘oneirophany’ (Gn 15:1–21, 20:3–6, 28:11–17 and 1 Ki 3:5–15). The study concludes with a few remarks on the limits of the proposal and suggestions for more extensive and in-depth future research in related and alternative areas.
This article seeks to clarify the concept of " philosophy " as it appeared within popular overviews of South African Old Testament scholarship published in the post-apartheid era. After providing a typology of related research, the... more
This article seeks to clarify the concept of " philosophy " as it appeared within popular overviews of South African Old Testament scholarship published in the post-apartheid era. After providing a typology of related research, the discussion proceeds with the identification of the words " philosophy " / " philosophical " in the associated colonialist scholarly discourses. The latter part involves a brief classification, commentary and critique of the meta-philosophical assumptions supervening on the associated intra-and cross-disciplinary contexts. " The secret of theory is that truth does not exist. " 1
Following 19th-century distinctions between Hellenism and Hebraism, many popular 20th-century histories of Western philosophy assigned the intellectual world of the Hebrew Bible to a twilight zone between late mythological and early... more
Following 19th-century distinctions between Hellenism and Hebraism, many popular 20th-century histories of Western philosophy assigned the intellectual world of the Hebrew Bible to a twilight zone between late mythological and early philosophical ways of thinking. Partly in response to this, research in Semitic languages during that time began to include comparative-linguistic arguments hoping to demonstrate radical structural incommensurability between Hebrew and Greek ways of thinking. In the latest trend in the associated research, a multidisciplinary dialogue has been initiated on the subject of " second-order thinking " within the ancient Near East " before " or " outside " Greek philosophy. In this article, the author aims to contribute to the ongoing discussion by suggesting that Biblical Hebrew as religious language already presupposes an intricate variety of transposed second-order thinking.
This article seeks to clarify the concept of " philosophy " as it appeared within popular overviews of South African Old Testament scholarship published in the post-apartheid era. After providing a typology of related research, the... more
This article seeks to clarify the concept of " philosophy " as it appeared within popular overviews of South African Old Testament scholarship published in the post-apartheid era. After providing a typology of related research, the discussion proceeds with the identification of the words " philosophy " / " philosophical " in the associated dominant scholarly discourses. The latter part involves a brief meta-philosophical classification, commentary and critique of assumptions supervening on associated intra-and cross-disciplinary contexts. " The secret of theory is that truth does not exist. " 1
Research Interests:
In Hebrew Bible/Old Testament scholarship, one encounters a variety of reductive perspectives on what exactly Yahweh as religious object is assumed to be. In this article, a clarification of the research problem is followed by an... more
In Hebrew Bible/Old Testament scholarship, one encounters a variety of reductive perspectives on what exactly Yahweh as religious object is assumed to be. In this article, a clarification of the research problem is followed by an introductory overview of what is currently available on this topic as is attested in the context of various interpretative methodologies and their associated metalanguages. It is argued that any attempt to describe the actual metaphysical nature and ontological status of the religious object in the jargon of a particular interpretative approach is forever prone to committing the fallacy of reductionism. Even so, given the irreducible methodological perspectivism supervening on heuristic specificity, reductive accounts as such are unavoidable. If this is correct, then it follows a fortiori that a unified theory (of everything Yahweh can be said to be) and an ideal metalanguage (with which to perfectly reconstruct the religious object within second-order discourse) are a priori impossible.
Against the backdrop of the problem of the meaning of life as constructed in contemporary analytic philosophy of religion, this article asks the question of what the supposed meaning(s) of the biblical character of Moses' life were... more
Against the backdrop of the problem of the meaning of life as constructed in contemporary analytic philosophy of religion, this article asks the question of what the supposed meaning(s) of the biblical character of Moses' life were assumed to be. By comparing a variety of contemporary philosophical perspectives on life's meaning with what appears to be related nascent metaphysical presuppositions in the world(s) of the biblical text, the pros and cons of reading with an anachronistic philosophical-theological metalanguage are clearly demonstrated. It is concluded that what Moses' life might have meant cannot be reduced either to a singular purpose or a unified teleology. Given the complex construction of his character's personal identity over time, the point of it all remains fragmented, plural and elusive.
Research Interests:
Fiction Writing, Religion, Comparative Religion, Ancient History, Comparative Literature, and 75 more
What has been called " the pneumatology " of the Hebrew Bible is generally held to be an unsolved problem. To this day, available research operates on the assumption of a " missing link " between theological, cosmological, and... more
What has been called " the pneumatology " of the Hebrew Bible is generally held to be an unsolved problem. To this day, available research operates on the assumption of a " missing link " between theological, cosmological, and anthropological domains distinguished within the metalanguage. This is indeed evident from a comparative-philosophical perspective in that the conceptual background for ‫-רוח‬type entities as encountered in scholarly discourse comes across as ontologically disjointed and metaphysically fragmented. In the present article, the author argues that the riddle of " The One and the Many " is a pseudo-problem generated by anachronistic Platonic dualism supervening on inquiries into the assumed nature of ‫רוח‬ as " Ursubstanz " and the mereology of ‫-רוח‬type entities in the world of the text. In addition, a unified theory is put forward with reference to the problem of part-whole relations as can be reconstructed from the perspective of more monistic conceptions of spirit in the associated history and philosophy of religion.
Research Interests:
Religion, Comparative Religion, History, Ancient History, Hebrew Literature, and 56 more
Within a literary ontology, YHWH in the Hebrew Bible is technically also a fictional entity or object. In Hebrew Bible scholarship, a variety of philosophical issues surrounding fiction have received sustained and in-depth attention.... more
Within a literary ontology, YHWH in the Hebrew Bible is technically also a fictional entity or object. In Hebrew Bible scholarship, a variety of philosophical issues surrounding fiction have received sustained and in-depth attention. However, the mainstream research on these matters tends to focus on the philosophical foundations of or backgrounds to a particular literary theory, rather than on metaphysical puzzles as encountered in the philosophy of fiction proper. To fill this gap, the present article seeks to provide a meta-theoretical overview of the main contemporary philosophical perspectives on the metaphysics of fictional objects. Three views (and their sub-currents) are discussed, namely possibilism, (neo-)Meinongianism and (literary) creationism. Each view’s theory is introduced and critically appropriated with reference to what is implied to be an answer to the question of what exactly the biblical character YHWH can meaningfully be said to be in the context of the metaphysics of fictional objects. In this way, the present study also goes beyond the traditional concern with the nature of God in Old Testament theology.
Research Interests:
Fiction Writing, Critical Theory, Religion, Hebrew Literature, Mythology, and 71 more
In the apocryphal text of the Letter (Epistle) of Jeremiah (Ep Jer), a long list of reasons is given by the implied author as to why certain entities alleged to be gods are not in fact such. Brief summaries of the author's various points... more
In the apocryphal text of the Letter (Epistle) of Jeremiah (Ep Jer), a long list of reasons is given by the implied author as to why certain entities alleged to be gods are not in fact such. Brief summaries of the author's various points characterise scholarly perspectives thereon. What has been overlooked in the research, however, and the topic of this article, concerns the converse fact that, in the construction of a negative identity for divinity, the text also assumes a lot about what a god must actually be like. Moreover, what is implicit in these " meta-theistic " presuppositions has never before been identified; hence the need for an attempted inferential reconstruction of what, according to the polemics of Ep Jer, makes a god divine.
Research Interests:
Religion, Comparative Religion, Philosophy, Philosophy Of Language, Epistemology, and 56 more
In Old Testament scholarship, a number of studies have attempted to answer in their own way the question of what an ‫אלהים‬ (a god in the generic sense) was assumed to be. This discussion is indirectly related to an older theme in OT... more
In Old Testament scholarship, a number of studies have attempted to answer in their own way the question of what an ‫אלהים‬ (a god in the generic sense) was assumed to be. This discussion is indirectly related to an older theme in OT theology, namely the " essence " of Yhwh's divinity in particular contexts. Whereas the relevant research has thus far only involved linguistic, literary, historical, comparative and theological approaches aimed at providing answers, none has paid closer attention to what exactly is meant by a question of the form " What is X? " itself. The originality and contribution of this study lies with its exclusive descriptive and meta-theoretical philosophical concern with the multiplicity of ways in which concepts of whatness and essence can be interpreted in relation to the concept of generic ‫אלהים‬ as common noun in the Old Testament. The aim is to provide a prolegomenon for future theory in service of a more nuanced manner of speaking. Abstrak In Ou Testamentiese navorsing het bestaan daar studies wat elke op eie wyse poog om die vraag oor wat n ‫אל‬ ‫הים‬ (n " god " in die generiese sin) is te beantwoord. Die betrokke akademiese gesprek hou indirek verband met n ouer tema in Ou Testamentiese teologie, naamlik rondom die essensie van Jhwh se goddelikheid in spesifieke kontekste. Waar die relevante navorsing tans beperk is tot linguistiese, historiese, komparatiewe en teologiese perspektiewe (wat almal poog om dit te antwoord), blyk daar skynbaar min belangstelling te wees in wat hoegenaamd bedoel word met n vraag van die vorm " Wat is X? " Die oorspronklikheid van die huidige bydrae bestaan in die eksklusief deskriptiewe en meta-teoretiese filosofiese fokus op die veelvoud van wyses waarop die konsepte van wat-heid en essensie geinterpreteer kan word in relasie tot die konsep van generiese godheid in die Ou Testament. Die doel is daarvan is om n prolegomenon vir toekomstige teorie daar te stel ter wille van n meer genuanseerde meta-taal.
Research Interests:
What, according to the Hebrew Bible, was a god assumed to be? In this article the author looks at data potentially relevant to any attempt at answering this question within a sub-type of ‫אל‬ theophory in the Hebrew Bible. These involve... more
What, according to the Hebrew Bible, was a god assumed to be? In this article the author looks at data potentially relevant to any attempt at answering this question within a sub-type of ‫אל‬ theophory in the Hebrew Bible. These involve personal names that can be rendered into English as " My god is x " , where x denotes a phenomenon the deity is prima facie wholly identified with. The approach adopted by the study is philosophical in general and descriptively metaphysical in particular. The objective is to provide an experimental clarification of this particular sub-type of proper names in Biblical Hebrew with the aid of technical conceptual distinctions found within mainstream interpretations of Aristotle's theory of predication.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
This article takes a closer look at how the so-called Analytic-Continental divide within meta-philosophy has manifested itself within various forms of " philosophical criticism " of the HB. It is argued that, based on data collected from... more
This article takes a closer look at how the so-called Analytic-Continental divide within meta-philosophy has manifested itself within various forms of " philosophical criticism " of the HB. It is argued that, based on data collected from recent related conferences, there is evidence of influence from both sides of the divide within both broad/narrow and expli-cit/implicit types of philosophical criticism. However, in contrast to tense relations elsewhere in generic philosophy, the interdisciplinary intersection of biblical scholarship, philosophy of religion and Jewish philosophy appears to display a general acceptance of methodological diversity.
Research Interests:
The book of Ecclesiastes (here 'Qohelet'), like many other books of the Hebrew Bible, is often discussed with reference to its supposed 'ethics'. Within biblical scholarship, such research is often characterized by a metalanguage filled... more
The book of Ecclesiastes (here 'Qohelet'), like many other books of the Hebrew Bible, is often discussed with reference to its supposed 'ethics'. Within biblical scholarship, such research is often characterized by a metalanguage filled with philosophically vague and fuzzy descriptive jargon, largely bereft of technical distinctions and nuance. One possible reason for this state of affairs may be the fact that Qohelet's assumptions about the nature of morality have never been studied against the backdrop of issues and theories in contemporary analytic meta-ethics. In response to this gap in the research, and with proposals for conceptual refinement in mind, this article offers the first ever meta-theoretical introduction to some of the semantic, ontological, epistemological and other related meta-ethical concerns and categories which may be of use in future analyses of the foundations of Qohelet's 'ethics'.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Much has been written on the concept of “the fear of Yhwh” in biblical wisdom literature. The scope thereof is said to include anything from sheer terror before the deity to pious respect for benevolence. In this article, a different... more
Much has been written on the concept of “the fear of Yhwh” in biblical wisdom literature. The scope thereof is said to include anything from sheer terror before the deity to pious respect for benevolence. In this article, a different necessary property of the basic disposition is identified. It is argued that if as many texts in the Hebrew Bible state a) wisdom involves the fear of Yhwh, and that b) possessing knowledge of some sort is a necessary condition for having wisdom, and that c) all knowledge is essentially paranoiac as Lacanian psycho-epistemology suggests, then it follows that d) the quest for wisdom itself is partly driven by paranoia.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:

And 22 more

What can be said about Israel and the Near East in the history of atheism? One way to approach this question is to take a step back and look at some of the presuppositions, problems, and perspectives involved in the genealogy of the... more
What can be said about Israel and the Near East in the history of atheism? One way to approach this question is to take a step back and look at some of the presuppositions, problems, and perspectives involved in the genealogy of the specific scholarly concepts, concerns, and categories in the associated research. In other words, the history of atheism in relation to Israel and the Near East is also itself an idea with a history, a more concise reconstruction of which is long overdue. This chapter offers a brief summary of a selection of assorted nuances characterizing the literature on the subject, with special attention to typologies of atheism in Old Testament/Hebrew Bible scholarship.
A new interpretation of the text that shows the problems with and alternatives to the dominant hypothesis according to which the author was alluding to Euhemerism.
Emergence and new concepts of God: examples from the Old Testament Gericke, Jaco URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10500/11944 Date: 2013-11 Type: Book chapter Abstract: In this article, the author looks at “emergence” in the context of new... more
Emergence and new concepts of God: examples from the Old Testament
Gericke, Jaco
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10500/11944
Date: 2013-11
Type: Book chapter
Abstract:
In this article, the author looks at “emergence” in the context of new concepts of God in the Old Testament. Within
biblical scholarship, various types of emergence are alluded to in various methodological reductions, i.e. via
theological, historical-comparative, sociological and literary-critical approaches to the text. From a philosophical
perspective on the Old Testament as a complex system, however, emergent properties of Yhwh are instantiated in
the paraconsistent logic operative in fictional discourse.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Much has already been written on Girard and the HB/OT in general and in relation to the Book of Job in particular, especially in reception histories from the 1990's onwards. In this contribution, the author attempts to offer a new... more
Much has already been written on Girard and the HB/OT in general and in relation to the Book of Job in particular, especially in reception histories from the 1990's onwards. In this contribution, the author attempts to offer a new perspective on Girard's reading of Job by showing its location at the intersection where his own anthropological literary criticism and the methods of HB/OT (Joban) scholarship on the one hand meet the turn to theology in Continental philosophy and the issues of interest in analytic philosophy of religion on the other. The complex and multi-dimensional meta-commentary is followed by a comparative-philosophical-critical clarification of what appears to be the paradoxical effect of attempting to restate Girard's reception of Job on his own terms in order to understand why he wrote about the Book of Job in the way he did, or why he wrote about it at all.