Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
  • I spent the academic year 2019-2020 as a Fulbright U.S. Scholar in Russia. Living in Moscow, I taught a seminar, "Dem... moreedit
's violent end has engendered impassioned, unending debate: « how to tell a tyrant from a just king; how to tell envious murderers from heroic republicans; how and when to justify assassination 1 .» But any notion that his killing had the... more
's violent end has engendered impassioned, unending debate: « how to tell a tyrant from a just king; how to tell envious murderers from heroic republicans; how and when to justify assassination 1 .» But any notion that his killing had the potential of being an act of conciliation or intermediation appears to be absurd. Even the site of the murder, the Senate chamber in Pompey's theater complex in the Campus Martius, seems to preclude it, suggesting furious retribution. Indeed, Plutarch underlines the irony of the location of Caesar's slaughter: Pompey's
Readers of history judge historians for what they say. But what about historians' silences, what they have left unsaid? Giving attention to this dimension of an historian's writing can pay rich dividends. By looking at specific omissions... more
Readers of history judge historians for what they say. But what about historians' silences, what they have left unsaid? Giving attention to this dimension of an historian's writing can pay rich dividends. By looking at specific omissions we may gain understanding about what historians wanted us to believe, how they attempted to manipulate their readers, and how they arranged their narratives to achieve their objectives. In this chapter, I pursue this line of inquiry concerning the history of the Greek historian Polybius. As a political hostage at Rome, Polybius necessarily offered a foreigner's perspective on Roman imperial power. Despite his well-deserved reputation as an ancient historian of the first order 1 , several bewildering aspects of his treatment of Rome, especially in the sixth book, have
T HE SPEECHES IN POLYBIUs' HISTORIES provide important insights into what is perhaps the most controversial topic in Polybian studies: the Greek historian's attitudes towards Rome. A great deal of modern scholarly debate has... more
T HE SPEECHES IN POLYBIUs' HISTORIES provide important insights into what is perhaps the most controversial topic in Polybian studies: the Greek historian's attitudes towards Rome. A great deal of modern scholarly debate has revolved around mutually exclusive interpretations that Polybius was essentially either pro-Roman or anti-Roman.' A close reading of the Histories suggests a more nuanced approach to the question of Polybius' views on Rome. Viewing Polybius' barbarian category in relation to his representations of the Romans provides a key to the historian's stance(s) on Rome, and here his speeches are of the utmost importance. The objectives of the present study are to analyze Polybius' "barbarology" vis-'a-vis Rome, with a special focus on the medium of the reported speech, and to explore its implications regarding the political predicament of Greek statesmen of the second century in the face of Roman power. In only one passage in the Histories (12.4b.2-3, discussed in Section II below), does the Achaean historian say in his own voice that the Romans were a barbarian people. Yet in three reported speeches, Polybius allows his historical agents Agelaus, Lyciscus, and a Greek ambassador, probably the Rhodian statesman Thrasycrates, to call the Romans "barbarians."2 Without discounting the historicity of these ambassadors' charges against the Romans, I shall argue that Polybius employs these speeches as a vehicle for indirect expression of hostility towards Rome, a hostility conforming to widespread Greek public opinion at the time of composition of the Histories.3 I refer to this Greek view of the Romans as fdpfa3pot, according to
Ancient historians have paid scant attention to political scientists in general, and what has come to be called International Relations (IR) Theory in particular. In terms of classical antiquity and international relations, Adcock and... more
Ancient historians have paid scant attention to political scientists in general, and what has come to be called International Relations (IR) Theory in particular. In terms of classical antiquity and international relations, Adcock and Mosley's 1975 study deserves mention, but the first part of the book (written by Adcock) was historical narrative and the second (written by Mosley) was an analytical account of the forms and institutions of ancient diplomacy. Neither paid any attention to general theories in political science.
Review Article: BMCR 2023.01.08: J. Mackey, Belief and Cult: Rethinking Roman Religion (Princeton 2022)
This is a pre-publication draft. There is time for suggestions for improvement, which I welcome.
Paper published in Polybius and His Legacy: Tradition, Historical Representation, Reception
Review discussion on recent scholarship on POLYBIUS (to 2022)
A study of the Academic philosopher Carneades and the "philosophical embassy" to Rome in 155 BCE. It considers Carneades' career as both philosophy and diplomat, and how he reconciled his two callings. Keywords: Carneades, Academic... more
A study of the Academic philosopher Carneades and the "philosophical embassy" to Rome in 155 BCE. It considers Carneades' career as both philosophy and diplomat, and how he reconciled his two callings.

Keywords: Carneades, Academic philosophy, skepticism, Stoicism, Greek and Roman diplomacy
A survey of the question of peace movements in the ancient Greek and Roman worlds.
Review of collected essays (in German) on the topic of the notion of "state" and "statehood" and their applicability to the study of ancient Rome.
Research Interests:
Book Review of collected essays by K.-J. Hoelkeskamp.
Research Interests:
Study of Greek perceptions of Roman generals and statesmen in the second century BCE.
Research Interests:
Study of Polybius' influence on Livy.
Research Interests:

And 1 more

Paper delivered at the Symposium, The Roman Legacy, at the University of Minnesota, 21 April 2017
This is chapter 2.5 of the forthcoming Oxford History of the Roman World. It is at the copy-editing stage, not yet in press. This means there is a little time to solicit feedback: comments, criticisms, suggestions for improvement. I... more
This is chapter 2.5 of the forthcoming Oxford History of the Roman World. It is at the copy-editing stage, not yet in press. This means there is a little time to solicit feedback: comments, criticisms, suggestions for improvement. I invite you to comment.
A conference presentation on the assassination of Julius Caesar. The paper focuses on the exact location of Caesar's murder: the Senate chamber in Pompey's theater complex in the Campus Martius, arguing that the "liberators" decision to... more
A conference presentation on the assassination of Julius Caesar. The paper focuses on the exact location of Caesar's murder: the Senate chamber in Pompey's theater complex in the Campus Martius, arguing that the "liberators" decision to assassinate Caesar there was highly charged symbolically, according to the dictates of "pomerial ideology."
Research Interests:
Edited volume on Roman Imperialism.
A monograph on ancient Roman religion published in 2017 by the Princeton University Press.
Monograph on the Greek historian Polybius, published in 2004 by the University of California Press.