Luigi Alici

... senso 53 zione che la minaccia dell'insignificanza non grava mai sul partico-lare ... 54 Luigi Alici fronti dell'esistenza, sembra preferita oggi una cultura della "digres-sione ... diversi orientamenti speculativa da quello, tipico della cosiddetta tradizione "continentale", che, sulle orme di ...

Contemporary culture is shot through with a renewed openness to polytheism. This contribution seeks to listen in on a critical interlocution between Augustine and contemporary thought regarding this theme, re-reading according to a coherent continuity the first and second parts of De civitate Dei. The fundamental intent of this re-reading can be laid out in three key theses: a) The first thesis calls upon the anthropological pertinence of faith: unlike atheism, which can be considered a conspicuous variable of modern culture, but historically limited and rather elitist, the true alternative that is continually proposed to us by the Fathers, starting from the Scriptures, and by Augustine in particular, is not between believing and not believing, but between faith and idolatry. b) The second thesis concerns the difference – and therefore the absolute incompatibility – between monotheism and polytheism. In the era of multiculturalism, it seems that religions can only be liberated from the temptation to fundamentalism if they are willing to enter into the pantheon of compatible cults. Actually, hidden behind the drift of polytheism, which crosses through wide sectors of contemporary culture, is an idolatrous pulsion, to which, with Augustine, we could attribute the Weltanschauung of the civitas terrena. c) The third and final thesis concerns the ethical and political implications of this difference; according to Augustine’s teaching, faith in one, transcendent God is an alternative not only to idolatrous faiths, but also to all forms of violence in interpersonal relationships. It is not at all true that a monotheistic faith is an obstacle to all forms of peaceful coexistence, or that in the name of a single system of thought it introduces into the political sphere a factor of rigidity and intolerance. According to Augustine, the exact opposite is true: it is the civitas terrena, drawing its gods from the earth, that seeks an equivocal sacralization and in this way infects the fabric of coexistence with the destabilizing and nihilistic virus of deceit and violence

La riflessione agostiniana intorno al rapporto tra libertà e libero arbitrio è analizzata alla luce di due approfondimenti etico-antropologici: il rapporto tra bene ontologico e male morale; lo schema triadico essere /conoscere / volere che rilegge lo statuto antropologico alla luce dell'analogia trinitaria

Augustine’s account of the citizen’s life in human community is philosophically superior to what is found in his inheritance because Augustine transforms the latter in a twofold manner. In the first place, Augustine takes Cicero’s teaching through the criteria of a pagan Neoplatonic doctrine of participation but secondly, and more significantly, Augustine guides what results from the latter through the content of Christian wisdom. By this means a superior doctrine of participation is forged through considering not only the doctrine of creation, which is shared with pagan Neoplatonism, but, more importantly, the unique Christian Platonist doctrine of mediation by Christ, ‘The Word made flesh.’ On this basis, Augustine evinces that Christian citizens can enjoy a genuine unity of purpose and action that was impossible for pagans. How so? Since the absence of a doctrine of participation or the presence of a merely Neoplatonic doctrine of participation could mandate some opposition between love of God and love of neighbor (i.e. between love of self, community and God or between love of temporal and of eternal justice) the Christian transformation of the Neoplatonic teaching on participation unites each of these loves into a simultaneous love of God and neighbor. Taking his cue both from Augustine’s scholarship and from Rist’s, Alici argues his point in several stages. First, he considers Augustine’s handling of Varro’s Ciceronian account of man and society to show that Augustine prefers to analyze the question of man’s orientation and end, i.e. his pursuit of happiness, from a Platonic perspective since the Platonists, unlike Cicero and the Stoics, have awareness of human finitude in relationship to the realities of (i) the limited nature of this life and (ii) divine creation. Second, Alici maintains that Augustine’s focus on the universal quest for peace (in 19.10) represents a decisive turn towards Platonism since understanding peace as “the ordered form of participation in the order of the good” (II. Autonomy and Heteronomy) shows that the pursuit of virtue encompasses both this world (as Cicero and the Stoics would agree) and the afterlife or celestial world (as the Platonists would agree based on recognizing the soul’s immortality). Hence, the pursuit of earthly peace, which is horizontal, and enduring peace, which is vertical, are inextricably linked on the outside, i.e. in terms of ontology, and on the inside, i.e. in terms of human motivation, since virtue “is essentially a form of ordered love … that consists in adhering to the truth in order to live in justice” (ibid). Third, after arguing that citizens of the city of God on earth have a “kind of paradoxical citizenship” insofar as “they tend toward pax aeterna” on account “of grace” but “live in the pax terrena” because “of nature” (3. Civitas Dei peregrina), Alici asserts (4. Love and justice) that Augustine reforms coherently the aforementioned Neoplatonic account of participation by his account of Christ as Mediator. This is because both love, i.e. the motive beneath man’s quest for happiness, and justice, i.e. what community pursues in this world, have a common origin and end that can be partly attained in this life while fully attained in the afterlife—so long as man embraces Christ as the remedy for his waywardness. Therefore through considering, on the one hand, divine creation and, on the other hand, human redemption in Christ, Alici argues that “the paradigm of justice” and “the paradigm of love” are grounded in what is objective and essentially complementary. Most importantly, this transformation of the Neoplatonist teaching on participation means that the Christian, at least, can pursue at once true justice by true love and, contrariwise, true love by true justice. Hence, the Christian teaching on participation gives a unity to the life of the citizen that was missing from the pagan Neoplatonic teaching on participation insofar as the latter is clear about man’s origin but leaves open the matter of man’s end. Put differently, while the pagan’s love of God can, in varying ways, oppose love of neighbor and vice-versa, the Christian can, at least in principle, everywhere practice love of God and love of neighbor. Since the Christian is ordained by grace to a celestial community, his love for God and neighbor can never be opposed in any earthly community. Thus, by contrast with the rival Stoic and pagan Neoplatonist paradigms of thought and action, the Christian Platonist paradigm does not present any contradiction between horizontal love and vertical love or, looked at another way, between autonomy and heteronomy.

... le contact avec Augustin est inattendu et fécond quand bien même l'analyse de ces ... La puissance herméneutique de l'intuition augustinienne se manifeste aussi dans le large ... aux auteurs et courants philosophiques (voir les entrées : Descartes, Port-Royal, jansénisme, Arendt ...

La recherche montre une tension, interieure a la vision de Ricœur de la condition humaine, entre l'acceptation de la temporalite comme une limite et l'ouverture qui, des le commencement, fondamentalement dans la transcendance, et en suite essentiellement dans la transmission d'un temoignage entre les generations, permet de cultiver l'esperance. L'histoire peut etre lue a travers cette polarite, car elle reflet la condition humaine comme condition finie tout en se deployant dans un arc de temps ouvert au futur. L'histoire exerce une influence sur la comprehension des questions humaines, s'ouvre sur un horizon d'attente, la ou la volonte et la liberte doivent se mettre en jeu : ce qu'il n'a pas ete realise doit etre considere ce qu'il reste a accomplir et qu'on doit faire. Precisement a ce carrefour entre reflexion sur le passe, analyse des dynamiques politiques, du droit et des institutions, s'ouvre le champ de bataille ou s'aff...

ISBN 978-88-255-3387-3 L'umano e le sue potenzialità, tra cura e narrazione In alternativa agli intenti decostruttivi tipicamente postmoderni, lo Human enhancement assume i risultati della tecnoscienza, applicandoli al mondo della salute e della vita umana, collocandosi nella prospettiva del transumanismo e del postumano, di cui rappresenta una sorta di corollario applicativo. Nasce su queste basi il sogno di una “umanità aumentata", di cui vengono esplorate alcune forme diverse, tra possibilisti e detrattori, ed esaminati alcuni nodi teorici (limite e confine, possibilità e potenzialità, fine e risultato, normale e normativo, eccedenza e carenza, natura e artificio), entro un orizzonte fondamentale, identificato dal rapporto tra persona, coscienza e libertà

In un’epoca di fragilità globale, l’avventura fra- gile e preziosa della libertà si ripropone in forme nuove. Sul piano del costume, in uno scenario di globalizzazione ferita – dalla pandemia alla guerra – le rivendicazioni libertarie, affidate a un individualismo possessivo che reclama for- me di autonomia “slegata”, si scontrano con gli appelli alla responsabilità, che intendono affida- re a istituzioni pubbliche la salvaguardia della convivenza, pur in un sostanziale agnosticismo nei confronti del bene comune. Sul piano teorico questa oscillazione riemerge in una contrap- posizione tra nemici e falsi amici della libertà, quindi tra il paradigma biocentrico, che guarda con sospetto a ogni forma di antropocentri- smo dominativo, ritenuto il principale respon- sabile del degrado della biosfera, e il paradig- ma tecnocentrico, che al contrario vede nel digitale il punto di fusione di una nuova sta- gione transumanista di “libertà aumentata”. Il libro ricostruisce questi scenari in modo agile e insieme documentato, innestandovi un percor- so costruttivo, alla ricerca di un punto di equili- brio fra autonomia e responsabilità, fra “libertà grande” e “libertà piccole”, fra persona e comu- nità. Nel segno della trascendenza del bene, che restituisce alla libertà l’umiltà di percorsi possi- bili entro orizzonti aperti di fraternità universale.

Il dibattito intorno all’antropocene intercetta e rilancia una sfida nata nel cuore della mo- dernità con l’avanzare di una postura antropocentrica, che rivendica un primato dell’uomo sulla natura in nome di un sapere che è anche potere. Rispetto a questa sfida, riproposta su basi diverse dalla crescita impetuosa della tecnoscienza, il paradigma antagonista del biocentrismo rifiuta al contrario ogni dualismo di soggetto e oggetto, invitando a guardare anche l’umano con gli occhi della natura, ma rischiando in questo modo di smarrire il senso e il valore della “differenza personale”. Una svolta in questo altalenante “tiro alla fune” può venire soltanto dallo sguardo relazionale di cui è capace la persona umana, in modo da ripensare l’unità plurale del cosmo e accreditare un’articolazione unitaria e solidale delle differenze. Nella prospettiva di una “euristica della fragilità” possono dischiudersi autentici orizzonti di fraternità planetaria, che la coscienza personale riconosce e traduce nel primato della responsabilità e della cura.