Pakistan Journal of Nutrition OPEN ACCESS ISSN 1680-5194 DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2017.200.206 Research Article Effect of Oil Palm Fronds and Setaria sp. as Forages Plus Sakura Block on the Performance and Nutrient Digestibility of Kaur Cattle Jarmuji, U. Santoso and B. Brata Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bengkulu University, Jalan Raya W. R. Supratman, Bengkulu, Indonesia Abstract Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of oil palm fronds as a substitute for Setaria sp., on dry matter and organic matter intake, weight gain and nutrient digestibility in Kaur cattle. Methodology: This study used a latin square design that consisted of 4 treatment groups with 4 replicates each. The 4 treatment groups were as follows: (1) Kaur cattle were fed 100% Setaria sp. + sakura block as the control (P0), (2) Kaur cattle were fed 25% oil palm fronds+75% Setaria sp. +sakura block (P1), (3) Kaur cattle were fed 50% oil palm fronds + 50% Setaria sp. + sakura block (P2) and (4) Kaur cattle were fed 75% oil palm fronds+25% Setaria sp. +sakura block. Results: Findings of the study showed that there were significant differences among the treatments (p<0.05) in all observed variables. Dry matter and organic matter intake and weight gains in P2 cattle were significantly higher (p<0.05) than the other treatments. Conclusion: It was concluded that the combination of 50% oil palm fronds and 50% Setaria grass plus sakura block resulted in the best performance of Kaur cattle. Key words: Oil palm fronds, Setaria grass, sakura block, performance, Kaur cattle Received: November 21, 2016 Accepted: January 25, 2017 Published: March 15, 2017 Citation: Jarmuji, U. Santoso and B. Brata, 2017. Effect of oil palm fronds and Setaria sp. as forages plus sakura block on the performance and nutrient digestibility of Kaur cattles. Pak. J. Nutr., 16: 200-206. Corresponding Author: U. Santoso, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bengkulu University, Jalan Raya W. R. Supratman, Bengkulu, Indonesia Copyright: © 2017 Jarmuji et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Competing Interest: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists. Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its supporting information files. Pak. J. Nutr., 16 (4): 200-206, 2017 To stimulate growth, supplementation with high nutrient supplements are needed. Our laboratory has produced a supplement called the sakura block. The sakura block is a type of urea multi-nutrient block that is formulated from local feedstuffs that supports energy, nitrogen and other nutrients13,14. The main objective of sakura block (a type of urea multi-nutrient block) supplementation is to provide a constant source of degradable nitrogen throughout the day and promote the growth of rumen microbes in ruminants fed poor quality forage15. Santoso et al.13 reported that using a sakura block increased weight gain, feed intake and feed efficiency in native goats. No study has been conducted to evaluate the combination of Setaria sp., oil palm fronds and sakura block as a beef cattle diet. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of oil palm frond and Setaria sp., grass combinations plus sakura block on the performances of Kaur cattle. It was hypothesized that the combination of oil palm fronds and Setaria sp., grass plus sakura block would result the highest performance of Kaur cattle. INTRODUCTION Kaur cattles are local cattle that have been maintained by the natives of the Kaur district, Bengkulu province, Indonesia for a long time (±20 generations) and have experienced natural selection in a tropical environment with the preservation of traditional ways. The Kaur cattle population is approximately 10,284 and is spread across all villages in the Kaur district1. Most local cattles are maintained in the field all day and therefore, consume only natural grass. Most Kaur cattles are maintained by natives because the cattles are more familiar with the local knowledge of the local culture. The maintenance system of Kaur cattle is currently done in the wild and Kaur cattle are more resistant to local diseases and parasites 2. The existence of Kaur cattle is especially important for increasing the incomes of the local indigenous people. However, the beef cattle business in the area of oil palm plantations have faced several problems, such as the decline of forage production in the areas of oil palm plantations3. MATERIALS AND METHODS Umiyasih and Anggraeny4 reported that dry forage derived from oil palm plantations, which is harvested every 30 days Animals: Four Kaur male cattle aged 10-12 months with from oil palm crops aged 1-2, 2-5 or 6 years is as much as an initial weight of 100±5.5 kg were used. This study was conducted from March-November, 2015 in the village of Pengubaian, South Kaur, Kaur district, Bengkulu province, Indonesia. 5-7 t of dry matter/ha/year, 1-5 t of dry matter/ha/year and 1 t of dry matter/ha/year, respectively. On the other hand, oil palm frond production increases with increasing age of the palm oil plants. Simanuhuruk et al.5 stated that there are 150 plants haG1 of oil palm plantation but in the field, Feeding treatments: Sakura blocks were made from a there are only 130 plants haG1. Each plant produces 24 fronds mixture of ingredients, which included 32% brown sugar, 28% rice bran, 15% grits, 15% sago, 5% urea, 2% salt, 1% TSP and 1% top mix (Table 1). Setaria grass and oil palm fronds were mixed in accordance with the treatments, while sakura blocks were given in the form of blocks. The grass (Setaria sp.) is commonly used by farmers. Oil palm fronds were obtained after oil palm harvesting, the bottom 1/3 of the fronds were discarded and the fronds were peeled, cut into quarters and then cut into small pieces at a 4-5 cm size. each year with an average weight of 3.44 kg per frond. Thus, in 1 year, a plantation area can produce as much as 10.7 t haG1 of fresh fronds, which is equivalent to 1.95 t of dry matter/ha/year6. Oil palm plantations produce as many as 1.07 million t of oil palm fronds7. However, this biomass has not been an important component in the feed system in ruminant livestock farming8 and its removal as waste has resulted in environmental problems. The use of oil palm fronds as forage for ruminants in an integrated beef cattle-oil palm system would be beneficial in reducing production costs and increasing income9,10. In addition, the forage under oil palm plantations could also be used by ruminants up to as much as 60-70%10. The nutritive values of oil palm fronds are suitable as a source of forage for ruminants. Astuti et al.11 reported that oil palm fronds contain 92.15% dry matter, 90.27% organic matter, 33.47% crude fiber and 4.84% crude protein. Akbarillah and Hidayat12 reported that oil palm fronds contain 4.07% crude protein and 3,293 kcal kgG1 gross energy. Table 1: Composition of sakura block Feedstuffs (%) Rice bran Brown sugar by-product Sago Yellow corn Urea Salt TSP Mineral mixture Top mix Total TSP: Triple superphosphate 201 Amount 28 32 15 15 5 2 1 1 1 100% Pak. J. Nutr., 16 (4): 200-206, 2017 The diet amounts were as much as 3.5% dry matter of cattle live weight to meet the nutrient substance needs of the animals. Feeding was done 2 times a day, namely, at 09:00 and 17:00, with drinking water available at all times. Daily gain and feed consumption were measured. Cattle were maintained for 5 months. The development of Kaur cattle is very fast compared with other breeds. Kaur cattles are more attractive for small farmers due to several advantages, such as high manure fertility, high work capacity, the utilization of less nutritious forages, higher carcass percentage, lean meat, higher positive heterosis in crosses, higher adaptability to the environment and lambing percentages may reach 80%. Male and female Kaur cattle have a white coat color that is slightly grayish, white, black and mixed black and white grayish. The bulls have an elongated head, a short neck, small ears that are straight to the top, big thighs and thick and hard skins. The wattle starts under the jaw and goes to the lower abdomen and they have a great gumba (hump) and big horns that are straight to the top, the female Kaur cattle have large bodies, which are long, deep and humped and have long horns that are rounded and positioned forward. These characteristics show that Kaur cattles are good worker cattle. These cattles have a high heat tolerance, are excellent worker cattle, are adapted to poor feed, have relatively fast growth and have a good carcass percentage. Digestibility trial: The cattles were maintained in individual Dry and organic matter intake: Experimental results cages so that a quantitative collection of feces could be made. Accurate records of feed intake and fecal output were kept and a sub-sample of each (10% of daily output in the case of feces) was collected for analysis. Samples were then dried, ground and stored before analysis. After grinding, feces were stored at -20EC until analysis. Feed and feces composition analyses followed AOAC16 standard procedures. The digestibility of nutrient was calculated as follows: showed that the treatments significantly increased (p<0.05) dry matter and organic matter intake. Kaur cattle that were given 50% oil palm fronds (P2) had 29.5% higher dry matter intake compared to P0 cattle. P1 or P2 cattles had 15.4 or 35.4% higher organic matter intake compared to P0 cattle, respectively. An increase in intake was due to the oil palm fronds (Table 2), which had a higher content of dry matter and organic matter compared to Setaria specie. The high water content of Setaria grass may also cause conditions where the cattle's rumen is fully loaded (bulky), thus causing the animal to stop consuming. The average consumption of oil palm fronds in P0, P1, P2 and P3 were 0, 3.05, 6.77 and 8.77 kg dayG1, respectively, whereas the average consumption of Setaria grass in P0, P1, P2 and P3 was 16.52, 14.21, 12.36 and 8.01 kg dayG1, respectively. Each cattle consumed sakura block up to as much as 0.4 kg dayG1 (Table 3). The dry matter intake of P0, P1, P2 and P3 were 3.19 (2.36% b.wt.), 3.55 (3.38% b.wt.), 4.13 (3.23% b.wt.) and 3.35 kg dayG1 (2.73% b.wt.), respectively (Table 3). These Experimental design: This study used latin square design, which consisted of 4 treatments replicated 4 times each. The four treatments tested were as follows: C P0: Kaur cattle were fed 100% Setaria sp.+0.4 kg sakura C block/head/day P1: Kaur cattle were fed 75% Setaria sp.+25% oil palm C fronds+0.4 kg sakura block/head/day P2: Kaur cattle were fed 50% Setaria sp.+50% oil palm C fronds+0.4 kg sakura block/head/day P3: Kaur cattle were fed 25% Setaria sp.+75% oil palm fronds+0.4 kg sakura block/head/day Nutrient digestibility (%) = Nutrient intake - Nutrient in feces x100 Nutrient intake Data analysis: The obtained data were analyzed using an analysis of variance17. If there were differences, they were then tested by Duncan's multiple range test. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Kaur cattle characteristics: The cattle used in the study were male Kaur cattle obtained from farmers in South Kaur, Kaur district. The observational results showed that nearly 80% of cattle maintained by the community of Kaur district were local livestock, particularly Kaur cattle. Kaur cattles are local beef cattle in Bengkulu that must be conserved and are considered animal genetic resources for Bengkulu Province, Indonesia. Table 2: Nutrient composition of the experimental rations (%) Feedstuffs DM Ash CP CF EE NFE Setaria 18.70 2.02 7.55 28.71 2.25 56.65 Oil palm fronds 23.76 5.51 3.38 36.64 1.27 37.88 Sakura block 81.19 7.55 17.36 5.49 3.36 50.79 DM: Dry matter, CP: Crude protein, CF: Crude fiber, EE: Extract ether, NFE: Nitrogen free extract 202 Pak. J. Nutr., 16 (4): 200-206, 2017 Table 3: Effects of the feed treatments on feed intake, body weight gain and nutrient digestibility in Kaur cattle Treatments ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Variables P0 P1 P2 P3 Oil palm frond intake (kg headG1 dayG1) 0.00±0.00 3.05±0.20 6.77±0.17 8.77±0.15 Setaria sp., grass intake (kg headG1 dayG1) 16.52±2.18 14.21±1.20 12.36±0.80 Dry matter intake (kg headG1 dayG1) 3.19±0.18a 3.55±0.20a 8.01±0.50 4.13±0.22b 3.35±0.25a Organic matter intake (kg headG1 dayG1) 0.65±0.06a 0.75±0/06b 0.88±0.05c 0.71±0.05ab Body weight gain (kg headG1 dayG1) 0.21±0.07a 0.34±0.07b 0.60±0.60c 0.22±0.03ab Dry matter digestibility (%) 44.77±5.38a 54.49±2.02b 55.48±3/13b 56.22±2.81b Organic matter digestibility (%) 52.72±6.02 66.50±4.04 66.75±2.63 68.50±3/15b a b b P0: 100% Setaria sp.+0.4 kg sakura block, P1: 75% Setaria sp., 25% oil palm fronds+sakura block, P2: 50% Setaria sp. +50% oil palm fronds+sakura block, P3: 25% Setaria sp. +75% oil palm fronds+sakura block. Different superscripted letters within the same row represents a significant difference (p<0.05) results agree with the observations of Orskov and Ibrahim18, P2 and P3 had 26.1, 26.6 and 68.5% higher organic matter than that in P0. An increase in dry matter and organic matter in P1, P2 and P3 suggested that the addition of oil palm fronds and sakura block provided a better balance of nutrients and a better environment for bacterial activity to ferment feed in the rumen. McDonald et al.22 stated that digestibility is influenced by several factors such as diet composition, the chemical composition of the ration, the physical form of the rations and animal genetics. The process of microbial fermentation in the rumen is very important for the nutrient supply in livestock, so it needed to maximize feed utilization by optimizing the growth of microbes in the rumen8. Supplementation with sakura blocks with a high nutrient content, especially energy, protein and minerals was an effort to optimize microbial growth in the rumen13. However, the higher levels of substitution of Setaria grass had no effects on the digestibility of dry matter and organic matter. It was assumed that not all oil palm fronds provided in the feed were consumed because the cattle preferred to consume Setaria sp., than oil palm fronds when simultaneously presented. To improve the quality of oil palm fronds, they could be fermented11,23,24. The data indicate that oil palm fronds, which have low costs due to the products being available throughout the year, could be more widely used as a roughage source for ruminants and other herbivorous livestock 25,26. who found that the consumption of dry matter in cattle ranges between 2-3% of the body weight. An increase in the consumption of dry matter may be partly due an increase in palatability and nutrient balance in the feed. The palatability is a major factor increasing feed intake19. The maximum feed intake depends on the balance of nutrients in the gastrointestinal tract20. Thus, oil palm frond is more palatable than Setaria sp., consumption causes diarrhea in Kaur cattle, causing lower palatability and the inclusion of palm fronds as a partial replacement of Setaria sp., removed the occurrence of diarrhea. However, the substitution of Setaria sp., in Kaur cattle diet more than 50% had a similar nutrient consumption as the control group. It appears that the combination of 50% Setaria sp., 50% oil palm fronds and sakura block provided proper nutrition for the growth of microbes. An increase in microbial growth rates occurred because the sakura block provided essential substances such as glucose, nitrogen, minerals, vitamins and other nutrients21. Urea in the block can meet the majority of an animal's protein requirements because urea is converted into proteins by rumen micro-organisms. This process required soluble energy sources such as brown sugar and corn. The sakura block is a feed supplement that is made from materials such as rice bran, brown sugar, sago, corn, urea, TSP, salt, mineral mix and top mix and it is a good source for energy, nitrogen, vitamins and minerals13. Body weight gain: The experimental results showed that Nutrient digestibility: As shown in Table 3, the experimental the feeding treatments significantly improved (p<0.05) body weight gain. The P1 and P2 cattles had a higher body weight gain than P0 cattle (p<0.05). The P1 cattles were 61.9% larger than the P0 cattles, whereas the P2 cattles were 190.5% larger than P0 cattles. The highest body weight gain in P2 cattle was partly caused by higher dry matter and organic matter consumption. results showed that the treatments significantly improved the digestibility of dry matter and organic matter (p<0.05). It was observed that P0 cattle had lower digestibility compared to the cattle receiving the other treatments (p<0.05). P1, P2 and P3 had 21.7, 23.9 and 25.6% higher dry matter digestibility than that in P0. In addition, P1, 203 Pak. J. Nutr., 16 (4): 200-206, 2017 The high dry matter content of the oil palm fronds CONCLUSION supplemented with sakura block in P2 may contain more suitable nutrition for the growth of micro-organisms in the It can be concluded that oil palm fronds could replace rumen compared to the other treatments. It is assumed Setaria grass as much as 50% and result in the highest that the crude fiber of the oil palm fronds plus the sakura average daily gain in Kaur cattle. block could be utilized as a source of energy by rumen microbes, resulting in higher growth of the cattle rumen micro-organisms. Multi-nutrient blocks (such SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT as sakura block) are potential sources of readily available energy This study demonstrated that oil palm fronds could be and nitrogen27. This condition causes Kaur cattle to better beneficial for substituting Setaria sp., grass. The combination utilize the nutrition28. of 50% Setaria sp. and 50% oil palm fronds produced the Subagyono6 reported that Bali cattle that were given oil highest average daily gain because of higher nutrient intake palm fronds up to a 60% substitution, with 18% oil palm and higher digestibility. Thus, farmers could use this formula sludge, 18% palm kernel meal and 4% rice bran were able for feeding their beef cattle that are maintained under oil to produce a weight gain of 0.58 kg/head/day with a feed palm plantations. This study will help researchers uncover conversion ratio of 13.92. Azmi and Gunawan29 reported the critical areas of the integrated beef cattle-oil palm that feeding oil palm frond up to a 55% substitution, with system (the combination of Setaria sp. planted under oil 30% natural grass and 15% solid, increased weight gain by palm plantations and the use of oil palm fronds as forage) as much as 226.66 g/cattle/day, while the cattle fed natural grass resulted in a weight that many researchers were not able to explore. Thus, a new gain of 215 g/head/day. theory on the integrated beef cattle-oil palm system may Astuti et al.30 reported that oil palm fronds could replace have been arrived at. field grass with a better average daily gain in Kacang goat. Islam et al.31 reported that oil palm fronds could support an ACKNOWLEDGMENT efficient rumen function in terms of NH3-N concentration and pH when given fronds at <50%. Nanda et al.32 reported The authors that feeding oil palm fronds at 60% to substitute field Jakarta, Indonesia for the present study under contract whereas field grass at 60% resulted in a daily gain at No. 044/SP2H/LT/DRPM/2016. 0.41 kg headG1. Suharyono et al.33 reported that feeding field grass plus urea molasses multi-nutrient resulted in a REFERENCES higher average daily gain (0.62 kg headG1) compared to feeding field grass (0.28 kg headG1) in Bali cattle. highest daily gain of Kaur cattle thankful for financial assistance from the Directorate General of Higher Education of grass resulted in a 0.42 kg average daily gain in Bali cattle, The are 1. fed BPS., 2016. Bengkulu province in figure 2016. Statistics of Bengkulu Province, Bengkulu, Indonesia. 50% Setaria sp.+50% oil palm fronds+sakura block may be 2. due to higher dry matter and organic matter consumption Jamuji, B. Brata, U. Santoso and A. Saputra, 2013. The supplentation of sakura block for beef cattle in Kaur district. and enhanced nutrient digestibility. This group reached a The Report of IPTEKDA, Jakarta, Indonesia. 3. daily gain of 0.60 kg headG1. However, feeding 75% oil palm Purwantari, N.D., B. Tiesnamurti and Y. Adinata, 2015. Availability of forage under oil palm plantation for cattle frond drastically reduced daily gain to 0.22 kg headG1. This grazing. Wartazoa, 25: 47-54. condition may result from a drastic decrease in dry matter 4. and organic matter consumption because dry and organic Umiyasih, U. and Y.N. Anggraeny, 2003. Integrated system of animal and plantation: A review of the forage availability matter digestibilities were comparable to the 50% oil palm for beef cattle in oil palm plantation area. Proceedings of fronds group. Thus, this study demonstrates that Kaur cattle the Seminar for Integrated Oil Palm-Beef Cattle System, fed 50% Setaria sp. and 50% oil palm fronds plus sakura (IOPBCS'03), Bogor, Indonesia, pp: 156-166. block performed better than those fed the control diet of 5. Setaria sp., plus sakura block. To optimize the daily gain Simanuhuruk, K., Junjungan and A. Tarigan, 2007. Utilization of oil palm fronds as basal feed for Kacang goats on growing in this group, oil palm fronds could be fermented11 and the phase. Proceedings of the National Animal Husbandry and quality of the sakura block could be improved by the Veterinary Seminar, August 21-22, 2007, Sungai Putih, Galang, addition of medical herbs13,34-36. Indonesia. 204 Pak. J. Nutr., 16 (4): 200-206, 2017 6. 20. Wilson, J.R. and P.M. Kennedy, 1996. Plant and animal constraints to voluntary feed intake associated with fibre characteristics and particle breakdown and passage in ruminants. Crop Pasture Sci., 47: 199-225. 21. Aye, P.A. and M.K. Adegun, 2010. Digestibility and growth in West African dwarf sheep fed Gliricidia based multinutrient block supplements. Agric. Biol. J. North Am., 1: 1133-1139. 22. McDonald, P., R.A. Edwards, J.F.D. Greenhalgh, C.A. Morgan, L.A. Sinclair and R.G. Wilkinson, 2010. Animal Nutrition. 7th Edn., Prentice Hall, Harlow, England. 23. Tanaka, K., B.S. Youn, U. Santoso, S. Ohtani and M. Sakaida, 1992. Effects of fermented products from chub mackerel extracts on growth and carcass composition, hepatic lipogenesis and on contents of various lipid fractions in the liver and the thigh muscle of broilers. Anim. Sci. Technol., 63: 32-37. 24. Santoso, U., Y. Fenita, Kususiyah and I.G.N.G. Bidura, 2015. Effect of fermented Sauropus androgynus leaves on meat composition, amino acid and fatty acid compositions in broiler chickens. Pak. J. Nutr., 14: 799-807. 25. Dahlan, I., 2 000. Oil palm frond, a feed for herbivores. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 13: 300-303. 26. Zahari, M.W., O. Abu Hassan, H.K. Wong and J.B. Liang, 2003. Utilization of oil palm frond-based diets for beef and dairy production in Malaysia. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci., 16: 625-634. 27. Purba, A., I.W. Mathius, S.P. Ginting and F.R. Panjaitan, 2012. Pakan lengkap berbasis biomassa sawit: Penggemukan sapi lokal dan kambing kacang. Proceedings of the Seminar Insentif Riset SINas, November 29-30, 2012, Bandung, pp: 57-61. 28. Doyle, P.T., C. Devendra and G.R. Pearce, 1986. Rice straw as a feed for ruminants. International Development Program of Australian Universities and Colleges, Canberra, Australia. 29. Azmi and Gunawan, 2005. Utilization of oil palm waste for beef cattle feed. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner, September 12-13, 2005, Bogor. 30. Astuti, T., U. Santoso and Y. Amir, 2017. Nutritional value of fermented palm oil fronds as a basis for complete feed for ruminants. Pak. J. Nutr., 16: 96-100. 31. Islam, M., I. Dahlan, M.A. Rajion and Z.A. Jelan, 2000. Rumen pH and ammonia nitrogen of cattle fed different levels of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) frond based diet and dry matter degradation of fractions of oil palm frond. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 13: 941-947. 32. Nanda, D.D., A. Purnomoadi and L.K. Nuswantara, 2009. Production performance of Bali cattle fed with various levels of oil palm frond. Agromedia, 32: 54-63. 33. Suharyono, H. Sutanto, Y. Purwanti, Martanti, A. Agus and R. Utomo, 2014. The effect of urea molasses multi-nutrient and medicated block for beef cattle, beef and dairy cow. Atom Indonesia, 40: 77-87. Chan, K.W., I. Watson and L.C. Kim, 1981. Use of oil-palm waste material for increased production. Proceedings of the Conference on Soil Science and Agricultural Development in Malaysia, May 12-14, 1980, Malaysian Soil Science Society, Kuala Lumpur, pp: 213-241. 7. Buharman, B., 2011. The use of feed technology of local based source to support the productivity of beef cattle in West Sumatra. Wartazoa, 21: 133-144. 8. Ginting, S.P., 2005. Synchrony of protein and energy in the rumen to maximize the production of microbial protein. Wartazoa, 15: 1-10. 9. Russelle, M.P., M.H. Entz and A.J. Franzluebbers, 2007. Reconsidering integrated crop-livestock systems in North America. Agron. J., 99: 325-334. 10. Devendra, C. and R.A. Leng, 2011. Feed resources for animals in Asia: Issues, strategies for use, intensification and integration for increased productivity. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 24: 303-321. 11. Astuti, T., Y. Amir, Irdawati and U. Santoso, 2016. Nutritional improvement of palm oil fronds for Ruminant Feedstuffs Using a local biotechnological approach. Pak. J. Nutr., 15: 450-454. 12. Akbarillah, T. and Hidayat, 2009. Effect of heated palm oil frond in a palm kernel cake and palm oil processing-based diet on the performance of heifer. J. Indonesian Trop. Anim. Agric., 34: 28-35. 13. Santoso, U., I. Badarina and Warnoto, 2005. The effect of urea-multinutrient supplementation on the growth of Kacang goat. J. Indonesian Trop. Anim. Agric., 30: 157-161. 14. Zarah, A.L., I.D. Mohammed and F.I. Abbator, 2014. Rumen degradation characteristics of multinutrient blocks in semi-arid region of Nigeria. Anim. Prod., 16: 25-30. 15. Bheekhee, H., B. Hulman, A.A. Boodoo, R.K. Ramnauth, R.L.H. Yuen, R. Fakim and B. Dobee, 2002. Development and field evaluation of animal feed supplementation packages. Proceedings of the Final Review Meeting of an IAEA Technical Co-operation Regional AFRA, November 25-29, 2000, Venna, Austria, pp: 111-119. 16. AOAC., 2012. Official Methods of Analysis. 19th Edn., AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD., USA. 17. Toutenburg, H. and H.T. Shalabh, 2009. Statistical Analysis of Designed Experiments. 3rd Edn., Springer Science, New York, USA., ISBN-13: 9781441911483, Pages: 615. 18. Orskov, E.R. and M.N.M. Ibrahim, 1991. Feed resources, livestock and livestock products with emphasis on crop-livestock farmers. Proceedings of the International Seminar, October 21-25, 1991, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia. 19. Rolls, E.T., 2007. Understanding the mechanisms of food intake and obesity. Obesity Rev., 8: 67-72. 205 Pak. J. Nutr., 16 (4): 200-206, 2017 36. Samad, A.P.A., U. Santoso, M.C. Lee and F.H. Nan, 2014. Effects of dietary katuk (Sauropus androgynus L. Merr.) on growth, non-specific immune and diseases resistance against Vibrio alginolyticus infection in grouper Epinephelus coioides. Fish Shellfish Immunol., 36: 582-589. 34. Santoso, U., S. Ohtani and K. Tanaka, 2000. Tu-Chung leaf meal supplementation reduced an increase in lipid accumulation of chickens stimulated by dietary cholesterol. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 13: 1758-1763. 35. Santoso, U., J. Setianto and T. Suteky, 2005. Effect of Sauropus androgynus (Katuk) extract on egg production and lipid metabolism in layers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 18: 364-369. 206