Fishing For Answers
The Final Report of the
Social and Community
Benefits of Angling Project
Dr. Adam Brown
Dr. Natalie Djohari
Dr. Paul Stolk
Substance
January 2012
Authored by Adam Brown, Natalie Djohari and Paul Stolk
Published by:
Substance
3rd Floor Fourways House
Hilton St
Manchester M1 2EJ
www.substance.coop
All rights reserved.
Designed by Because Studio – www.becausestudio.co.uk
ISBN number: 978-1-906455-02-6
3
Contents
Foreword
4
Acknowledgements
5
Executive Summary
6
Introduction
9
1. Angling and Sports Participation
13
2. Angling and Health and Well-Being
28
3. Angling and the Natural Environment
40
4. Angling and Community Development
51
5. Angling Tourism and Rural Communities
63
6. Angling and Young People
77
Concluding Comments
91
4
Foreword
The Relevance
of a ‘Hidden’ Activity
Angling is in many ways a ‘hidden’ activity.
It is not something that commands great media attention (and income) like football, cricket or rugby even though it has as
many if not more participants. It is not often a part of the everyday ‘vista of life’, like seeing people cycling or running, although
it goes on all around us. Angling doesn’t generate much mainstream media hype around its celebrities, even though it has
them.
Angling isn’t visible in the way other activities are and for most people anglers are people they may see in odd locations
and on odd occasions – by the canal in the city centre or on the beach when on holiday, or in quirky adverts. Such a lack of
encounters generates a more general public ignorance of the activity: the widespread belief that it is entirely sedentary, and
probably involves sitting still, in the rain, under an umbrella, doing and catching little.
Even though it encompasses every shade of enthusiasm, from the person who stumbles onto a boat to catch some mackerel
once in a blue moon on holiday to the angler who dedicates their life to fishing – for many of those who have never taken part,
it remains a mystery. Indeed, the EA reported in 2004 that for over half the people surveyed who had never fished, doing so
simply had not occurred to them.
Whilst you can probably say this about many other sports, hobbies and leisure activities, it is unusual to be able to say so
of an activity that has over 4 million participants in the UK, worth in the region of £3bn to the economy, is so historically
rooted in the nation’s cultural practices, and involves such a diverse range of practices that impacts on the quality of life and
environment of both anglers and non anglers alike.
Our research suggests that the act of fishing embraces everything from sitting with a rod in hand by an urban pond a lone
carp, to climbing mountain peaks in pursuit of hill loch trout, to braving Britain’s coast chasing sea bass. This breadth in the
act of fishing, however, generates a much wider range of other actions with real social, environmental and economic impacts.
So our research also suggests that angling is about volunteering – to run clubs and associations. It is about business and
consumption - of the myriad magazines, websites and forums, tackle providers, TV programmes and DVDs. It is about working
to clean up the environment - along rivers and beaches, improving habitats so that biodiversity (including fish) can thrive.
Angling gets people involved in teaching and coaching - where young people learn not just about going fishing but also the
life cycles and habitats of species. It is about the engagement of excluded young people - leading to their ongoing personal
and social development. It involves travel and tourism - helping to sustain rural areas. And it involves family, friendships, social
interaction and debate. Lots of debate.
The title of this report, Fishing for Answers is deliberately aimed to provoke questions amongst a non-angling audience, and to
cause anglers to reflect on how they can successfully communicate the wider benefits of their sport to a non-angling public.
We cannot hope to include everything that this extensive project has encompassed in one report (and we have made all data
and interim reports available in response to this). But we do hope that this final report provides some substance about the
ways in which angling can deliver personal, social and community benefits – and how these can be improved, extended and
developed into the future.
Dr Adam Brown
Research Director of Substance
Angling Project Manager
5
Acknowledgements
This project would not have been possible without the contribution and participation of a huge number of people.
In particular we would like to thank the project’s Advisory Group who have spared invaluable time to support, comment
on, discuss and assist with the research project throughout the three years.
•Richard Wightman, National Angling Participation and Development Manager, Environment Agency
•Mark Lloyd, Chief Executive Angling Trust
•Jackie Sheldon, Senior Development Manager, Angling Development Board
•Jonathan Duncan, General Manager Get Hooked on Fishing
•Dr. Elisabeth Oughton, Principal Research Associate, Centre for Rural Economy, School of Agriculture, Food and Rural
Development, Newcastle University
•Dr. Paul Gaskell, Trout in the Town Project, Wild Trout Trust
•Eric Dawes, Business Development Manager, Angling Development Board of Scotland
•Naidre Werner, Director, Angling Trades Association
•Marion Lowe, former Chief Executive Get Hooked on Fishing (to December 2010)
•Ian Robertson, Scottish Country Sports Tourism Group, Scotland (2009)
Angling’s national organisations have given huge encouragement and assistance – the Angling Trust, Angling Development
Board, Angling Development Board of Scotland, Angling Trades Association, Scottish National Angling Association, Scottish
Sea Anglers Federation, Scottish Coarse Anglers Federation and others.
We would also like to thank those projects with whom we have worked most closely during the life of the project. These
include: all the projects trustees and managers of Get Hooked on Fishing; a wide range of other youth projects around the
country; the coordinators of all of the Trout in the Town projects; a number of Assynt organisations (Angling Club, Angling
Association, Crofter’s Trust, Foundation, Community Council); Visit Scotland; the Highland Council; Country Sports Tourism
Group and many more.
Finally we would like to extend our thanks to thousands of anglers, coaches, teachers, parents, young people and others who
have openly shared their experiences and views with us and without whom the research would not have been possible.
About Substance
Substance is a social research co-operative working in sport, youth and community development and beyond. Substance
helps projects and organisations delivering personal, community and social development to improve and demonstrate impact
and value.
This project has been undertaken by Adam Brown, Natalie Djohari and Paul Stolk but has also had invaluable input from David
Carpenter (websites) and associates Eva Serencisova (Assynt interviews), Loz Ives (Because Studio design), Fiona Mcgee
(proofing).
For more information see:
Project Websites:
www.resources.anglingresearch.org.uk
www.anglingresearch.org.uk
www.assynt.anglingresearch.org.uk
www.substance.coop
6
Executive Summary
Introduction
This report is the culmination of three years research into the social and community benefits of angling. The research was
funded by the Big Lottery Fund research programme from 2009-2011 and was undertaken by Substance, a research cooperative based in Manchester, UK.
The project has sought to provide in depth evidence about the different ways in which recreational angling can have positive
benefits for individuals and communities, particularly the people who take part in it and the communities in which it takes
place.
The Final Report is divided into six main sections which seek to summarise findings in areas that are the most important and
most relevant to current policy and practice developments. It is designed to inform and influence future developments in those
areas.
1. Sports Participation
The first section of this report describes angling’s contribution to sport participation outcomes. This incorporates: angling’s
role in encouraging very large numbers of people to participate in a sport incorporating a breadth of physical activity; and how
angling offers a distinctive alternative to other sports, including ‘life-long’ participation, green exercise and distinctive forms of
competition.
It evidences how angling:
•Gets millions of people involved in sport in the UK
•Provides opportunities for many different levels of physical activity for people of all abilities, including the less able
•Provides a national infrastructure of clubs and governing bodies
•Is a gateway for a wide range of positive social and environmental activities
•Provides opportunities for structured contests as well as distinctive informal competition
•Differs as a competitive sport in a number of respects, particularly in enabling accessible, integrated competition
•Has some barriers to participation that still need to be overcome.
2. Health and Well-Being
Section 2 of the report describes the positive role that angling plays in improving public health and well-being. Angling offers
specific health and well-being benefits: as an informal recreational activity that can build resilience against ill health through
opportunities for relaxation, relief from stress, improved physical activity and access to natural environments; and as part of
targeted intervention programmes that assist in the restoration and recovery from physical and mental ill health.
It evidences how angling:
•Contributes to preventative and restorative measures by increasing physical activity and providing programmes that assist
in recovery from physical illness
•Makes both a preventative and restorative contribution to mental health
•Introduces protective factors that promote good mental health
•Provides programmes that assist in the treatment and recovery from mental illness
•Helps build young people’s relationships and confidence
•Provides opportunities for ‘active ageing’.
7
3. The Natural Environment
Angling delivers benefits for the environment and for people accessing natural environments in two principal ways: by
delivering environmental benefits through angler engagement in conservation, ecosystem monitoring and raising environmental
awareness; and by acting as a ‘gateway’ for people to access green spaces and create connections with nature which
improves the well-being of people and their communities.
This section evidences how:
•Angling helps improve aquatic habitats
•Angling organisations assist habitat conservation that has wider community benefits
•Anglers can be the eyes and ears of the natural environment because they spend so much time in and around
aquatic habitats
•Angling contributes to public knowledge about freshwater and marine environments, both formally and informally.
•Angling is a gateway activity for people to make connections with nature.
4. Community Development
This section describes the positive role that angling and anglers can play in local communities in relation to: empowering
people to be active citizens through the development of new or renovated water based community assets; and creating
opportunities for greater cohesion and integration within communities.
It evidences how angling:
•Can be a means to empower people to become active citizens and bring people from different backgrounds together
•Organisations have been instrumental in developing, improving and maintaining community water assets that are accessible
to a range of people from different backgrounds
•Can build positive partnerships with local authorities and deliver local services that help local authorities and agencies meet
their community obligations
•Can assist in sustaining integrated and cohesive communities and embrace wider community needs and involve local people
5. Rural Communities and Angling Tourism
This section details the impact of angling in rural and remote communities. It illustrates: the valuable contribution that
angling tourism can make to rural communities in terms of economic impact and wider tourism development; and how the
development of good practice means angling can contribute to sustainable rural community development through employment
and the conversation of cultural heritage.
It evidences how:
•Angling tourism can be extremely important in terms of the economic contribution that visiting anglers make to rural areas
•Angling tourism can:
•Lengthen the tourist season
•Offset declines in other forms of tourism
•Contribute to ‘portfolio employment’
•Assist in sustaining the cultural heritage of rural communities
•Angling tourism can be developed through: provision and presentation of information using state of the art technology;
increased public access to angling; development of a broader outdoor tourism portfolio; the clustering of businesses and
co-operative competition; and community land ownership
•Angling tourism needs to be developed sustainably, maintaining a balance between ‘development’ and environmental and
social management factors.
8
6. Angling and Socially Young People
The last section of the report describes the positive role that angling can play in education, personal development and social
inclusion of young people. Compared to other positive activities, angling has a very distinctive offer to make in terms of:
providing personal and social development opportunities; raising attainment in education and employment; and diverting
young people from crime and antisocial behaviour.
It evidences how:
•The UK is a leader in the field of delivering personal and social development outcomes for young people through angling
•Angling has some distinctive attributes that make it a particularly useful tool for young people’s personal and social
development
•The best angling programmes take a holistic approach to tackling young people’s exclusion
•The most effective angling diversionary programmes establish exit routes into clubs and wider angling opportunities
•Angling programmes are particularly effective at addressing the need for young people to attain in education and training
•Angling is particularly suited to helping young people with additional welfare needs and behavioural or learning difficulties,
especially ADHD.
Conclusions and Recommendations
The final section of the report provides a series of recommendations for how the social and community benefits of angling can
be further developed in these six areas. A key aspect of this is a need for the ongoing generation of robust evidence about
angling’s social benefits, beyond the life of this project.
9
Introduction
The Social and Community Benefits of Angling Project Final Report
This report is the culmination of three years research into the social and community benefits of angling. The research
was funded by the Big Lottery Fund research programme from 2009-2011 and was undertaken by Substance, a research
co-operative based in Manchester, UK.
The project has sought to provide in depth evidence about the different ways in which recreational angling can have positive
benefits for individuals and communities, particularly the people who take part in it and the communities in which angling
takes place.
i) The Project Focus
The project has had three principal research areas:
Angling Participation: To understand more about what constitutes angling participation and how that participation can lead
to personal or wider community benefits.
Young People: To explore how angling can be used for positive youth development, particularly amongst those who are
socially excluded or who face additional life challenges.
Rural Communities: To research the role that angling can play in rural areas and in particular the ways in which angling
tourism can contribute to community development.
The project was based on research in England and Scotland specifically, and it is on those two countries that this report
is focused. However, we also considered examples of good practice occurring elsewhere, and the learning is applicable
across the UK.
ii) The Purpose of Big Lottery Funding
The Big Lottery Fund (BLF) research programme sought to enable third sector organisations to undertake and disseminate
evidence based knowledge:
‘to influence local and national policy and practice and, in the longer term, develop better services and interventions for
beneficiaries.’
Angling is on one level a very simple activity – the act of catching a fish with a rod and line. However, it is also complex,
multi-faceted, and a deeply historically rooted part of our culture. Its social effects are multiple and varied and not widely
understood.
Furthermore, over the last decade, there has been an increasing interest in angling practice and policy about how angling
can contribute to wider social and community development outcomes: from the allocation of public resources to increase
and develop participation, to specific programmes that have sought to use angling in instrumental ways for individual and
community development.
Our research has generated an enormous amount of evidence based knowledge about angling and has sought to help inform
and influence those policy and practice developments.
10
iii) The Policy and Practice Context
The research has been particularly timely.
On a national level the first decade of the 21st Century saw moves in both England and Wales and in Scotland to unify the
organisation and governance of angling. This included the formation of the Angling Development Board and Angling Trust in
England (who are due to merge in 2012); and the formation of the Angling Development Board of Scotland. This has been
followed by new funding streams to angling, from sports councils as well as environmental agencies.
On a local level, the last decade has seen an explosion of projects, initiatives, agencies, charities and facilities that have
sought to develop angling participation and use it for the purposes of social, economic and environmental benefit. These range
from projects to help clean up our rivers, to charities helping socially excluded young people, and tourism initiatives.
The changing policy landscape has seen a growing interest at governmental level in how activities in sport, culture and leisure
can deliver social benefits. Alongside this, agendas around health and well-being, environmental improvement, localism and
active citizenship, rural development and youth inclusion have all emphasised the importance of positive activities in delivering
wider social benefit.
Angling-related organisations have begun to articulate how angling can contribute to these agendas and have sought new
evidence to help them ‘make their case’; often finding however, that the evidence was not there. It is within this context that
the Social and Community Benefits of Angling project has taken place.
iv) The Research Context
The BLF research programme supports work that addresses particular evidence gaps. Despite the enormous volume of
angling literature, academically rigorous research into the social aspects of recreational angling in the UK has lagged behind
that of other sports and leisure activities. Whilst there is a developing body of research that has sought to understand the
behaviour of anglers - often referred to as the ‘human dimensions’ of fisheries science research - this has usually been
concerned with the impact of angling on fish and fisheries, rather than the impact of angling on people and communities. It is
with the latter that this project has been focused.
In the UK the relative absence of social science research about angling’s social impact stands in contrast to the significant
bodies of work, for instance in the sociology of sport and leisure studies, about comparable participation activities, including
‘mainstream’ sports and those with high media profiles like football, cricket and athletics. As such there has for some time
been an identified evidence gap in angling research.
In the last decade, interest in research into the social impacts of recreational angling has grown – including a number of
studies about the economic value of recreational angling; a series of reports commissioned and published by the Environment
Agency about participation and public attitudes to angling; and a handful of academic studies.
However, for the most part (and with some notable exceptions) this existing body of work has produced knowledge about
angling’s importance in general terms and on a national scale. Our research, in contrast, has sought to investigate how angling
affects people’s lives, the development of organisations, and particular local communities through a more in-depth focus.
11
Angling is the act of fishing with a rod, line, hook and bait or lure for recreational purposes (as opposed to
subsistence).
There are traditionally three ‘disciplines’ in the UK that are normally recognised within recreational angling and to
which we refer to in this report. They have been the basis around which national organisations have emerged and at
their most basic level describe the kind of fish being caught:
•Coarseishing–anglingpredominantlyforfreshwaterishthatyoudonotusuallyeat.
•Gameishing–anglingthatispredominantlyfortrout,salmon,seatroutandgrayling.
•Seaishing–catchingishthatliveinthesea.
However, such blunt distinctions mask a myriad of complexities in terms of method, practice, location, species,
cultural tradition and innovation. The terminology of both ‘coarse’ and ‘game’ fish hides some historically rooted
assumptions (and prejudices) as well as changing angling practices. Furthermore contemporary angling practices
suggest a blurring of boundaries that make such distinctions problematic – such as the growth in salt water fly fishing
by many game anglers. Also, the exponential growth in carp angling has seen it emerge as a distinct form of coarse
angling in its own right.
Millions of people take part in angling in the UK. Indeed it is often referred to as the most popular participation sport
or leisure activity in the country. However, this participation involves a diverse range of commitment, involvement,
frequency and practices. As such the definition of what makes ‘an angler’ can be varied and highly subjective.
v) Our Approach
To deliver such a wide ranging multi-faceted project across three years, our approach has necessarily used mixed
methodology. It has involved:
a) Large scale (national) survey work on angling participation involving over 2,400 anglers
b) More focused surveys, including those with over 200 young people, 54 youth projects and over 200 angling tourists
c) Nearly 700 in-depth semi-structured interviews and ‘light touch’ consultations with anglers, practitioners, policymakers and
community members
d) In-depth case study research with angling organisations amounting to over 185 fieldwork visits, over 430 hours of on-site
observation of youth intervention programmes, and action research with youth angling charity Get Hooked on Fishing
e) Case study research in the remote area of Assynt in of Sutherland, North West Scotland. This included repeat fieldwork
visits, consultation with 20 local organisations, surveys of over 300 anglers and visitors, and over 50 in depth angler
interviews
f) Development of bespoke on-line tools, including those for qualitative data submission and interactive digital mapping
amounting to over 280 individual online comment submissions and over 8,000 users of the Assynt Angling Research
website
g) Analysis of particular angling initiatives and events, including National Fishing Month and the Trout in the Town programme
h) Consultation with over 245 angling organisations.
vi) Our Outputs
Summarising such an extensive and complex research project into one report is an impossible task.
Recognising this, as well as the need to use evidence based knowledge to influence policy and practice as the project
progressed, we have sought to publish research throughout the project.
During the three years we published 17 Interim Reports on different aspects of angling and community benefit; 7 papers
for partner organisations that have been the focus of our research; three academic journal articles have been submitted for
peer review publications; 8 conference papers have been delivered; over 20 presentations have been made; and dozens of
meetings have been held with stakeholder groups.
Introduction
In Focus: What is Angling?
12
We also created and launched a bespoke Angling Research Resources website – www.resources.anglingresearch.org.uk
– which provides free, public access to:
•All Interim Reports
•Data visualisation, maps charts and graphs
•Interactive data dashboard
•Raw qualitative and quantitative data files
•Searchable directories of projects and research sites
•A unique, searchable on-line library of angling research.
vii) The Final Report
The Final report is divided into six main sections which seek to summarise findings in areas that are the most important
and most relevant to current policy and practice developments. It is designed to inform and influence future developments in
those areas.
These six sections of the Final Report are:
1. Sports Participation: How angling participation meets sports development outcomes, but also the ways in which angling
offers a distinction to other, more high profile, sports.
2. Health and Well-Being: How angling delivers physical and mental health benefits and the unique features of the activity
that lend itself to these outcomes.
3. The Natural Environment: Ways in which angling can lead to environmental improvement, protection and monitoring as
well as enable people to access ‘green spaces’.
4. Community Development: Evidence about the ways in which angling organisations contribute to community asset
development, active citizenship and community cohesion.
5. Rural Areas and Tourism: The contribution of angling tourism to social and economic development of rural communities
and how this can be encouraged further.
6. Excluded Young People: The instrumental use of angling as a tool for the engagement and personal development of
young people, particularly those who are socially excluded or disadvantaged.
The final section provides a summary of recommendations.
13
In Brief
The first section of this report describes angling’s contribution to sports and participation
outcomes. This incorporates:
•Angling’sroleinencouragingverylargenumbersofpeopletoparticipateinasport
incorporating a breadth of physical activity
•Anglingofferingadistinctivealternativetoothersports,including‘life-long’participation,green
exercise and distinctive forms of competition.
1.1 Introduction and Context
Getting people involved in sports and activities has been a very long-standing concern for national and local governments
and numerous charities and agencies in the UK. Increasing sport participation is a key aim of the national sports councils
in the UK, and sport-based funding has been one of the key sources of financial support for developing angling participation
in recent years.
•In England, angling participation is funded by both Sport England and the Environment Agency, with the Angling
Development Board (ADB), soon to merge with the Angling Trust, as the main delivery agency
•In Scotland, the Angling Development Board of Scotland (ADBoS) lead participation development, funded principally
by Sport Scotland
•Similar arrangements exist in Wales and Northern Ireland.
At times angling is considered somewhat sceptically as a ‘sport’ – usually based on ill-defined assumptions about physical
activity levels – yet angling does deliver key sports-based outcomes and meets some standard definitions of sport1: the active
participation of millions of people; competition that is both formal and informal, elite and community; a structure of governing
bodies, clubs and projects; and activities that attract support and resources from public agencies. However, angling offers
some distinctive features from other sports that mean it delivers added value in some areas of social and community benefits
from participation.
Our research into angling participation has been based on:
•An extensive, quantitative and qualitative, online survey of angling participation with over 2,400 anglers taking part2
•Semi-structured, in-depth interviews with over 150 anglers and angling stakeholders
•Website-based comment and feedback tools
•Site-based research at 12 key angling sites in England and Scotland, 36 young people’s projects, a case study in Assynt,
Scotland and numerous clubs, sites, projects and organisations.
1 Coakley, J. (2001) Sport in Society: Issues and Controversies, Boston: Mcgraw-Hill p 23
2 Stolk, P (2009) Angling Participation: Interim Report, Manchester, Substance http://resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/project_reports/
interim_reports_2009
1. Angling and Sports Participation
1. Angling and Sports
Participation
14
1.2 Angling’s Contribution to Sports Participation
1.2.1 Participation Numbers
Angling gets millions of people involved in sport in the UK.
Although estimates vary, it is indisputable that recreational angling in the UK has millions of participants and therefore must be
acknowledged as making a valuable contribution to getting people active in outdoor settings.
•The EA Public Attitudes to Angling (2010) report3 said that 9% of the population over 12 years of age in England and Wales
(equivalent to 4.2 million people) had been fishing in the last year.
•Sales of the EA Rod Licence (a legal requirement for anyone fishing in freshwater in England and Wales) increased by 35%
from 2000/01 to 1,431,981 in 2011
•In Scotland, sports participation statistics show that around 3% of adults (16+years) and 3% of children (8-15 years) took
part in angling during the most popular two months of each year 2006-20084
•Based on 2008 population figures for Scotland of 5,168,500, this equates to 155,055 participants (which has remained
fairly constant since 19875).
Sport England estimate that the numbers taking part in angling once per week stand at 134,000 with 980,000 taking part
once per month6. This makes angling the 16th highest participation sport in England in terms of weekly participation and
16th in monthly participation. However, because angling is classed as a low intensity activity, it ranks at only 29th in terms
of Sport England funding.
In Focus: The Angling Development Board www.anglingtrust.net/adb
In England, the Angling Development Board (ADB) is the main sports development organisation for angling. The
ADB’s Angling Whole Sport Plan 2009-2013 secured funding for angling from Sport England on the Sustain and
Excel outcomes; and from the EA on growing participation. The ADB will merge with the Angling Trust in April 2012
creating a single governing body for angling development.
The ADB’s achievements between 2008 and 2011 include:
•Growth from 2 staff to 13 full time and 5 part time staff
•Green rating Sport England business assurance
•The establishment of 29 County Angling Action Groups (CAAGs)
•Securing £232,000 funding additional to Sport England funding
•Attracting 13,021 participants in CAAG and club projects (11,233 Under 18)
•The development of a new recognised coaching standard; 1040 new coaches qualified; £75,000 in coach
training bursaries
•Approving 53 ‘Clubmark’ standard angling clubs
•Organising 86 flagship National Fishing Month events 2011
•Achieving a sports satisfaction rating of 84.5%
Mass Participation: Angling’s Distinction
Angling participation features some distinct characteristics compared to other sports, and it is these characteristics that
add value to the absolute participant numbers it delivers:
•Duration of activity is typically much longer (though less frequent) than other sports (as such the Sport England measure
of 3x30 minute segments of activity per week seems ill-suited to measuring angling participation)
•Participation can take place throughout the life course contributing to lifelong activity and ‘active ageing’
•The extent and nature of participation in angling goes far beyond the act of simply holding a fishing rod, delivering many
social and environmental benefits through a number of ‘associated activities’.
3 Simpson, D. and Mawle, G.W. (2010) Public Attitudes to Angling 2010, Bristol: Environment Agency
4 Sport Scotland (2008) Sports Participation in Scotland 2008, Research Digest no.110, Glasgow.
5 Sport Scotland (2002) A Profile of Angling in Scotland, Research Digest no. 91. Edinburgh.
6 Based on Sport England’s Active People Survey, statistics from ADB based on third quarter of 2011
15
1. Angling and Sports Participation
In Focus: The Angling Development Board of Scotland (www.adbscotland.org)
The Angling Development Board of Scotland (ADBoS) is a partnership between the three Scottish National
Governing Bodies for Angling; The Scottish Angler’s National Association (SANA), The Scottish Federation of
Coarse Angling (SFCA) and the Scottish Federation of Sea Anglers (SFSA). To date, ADBoS has been funded
by sportscotland to deliver work programmes that include the development of the UKCC-endorsed coaching
qualification for Angling at Levels 1 and 2, and the Club Angling package.
Since forming in 2010 ADBoS have:
•Launched the first ever licensed Coach Approval Scheme in Scotland with 15 approved coaches to date
•Launched UKCC approved Level 1 and Level 2 Coaching qualifications with 30 Level 1 and 10 Level 2
qualifications delivered per year; with an additional 4 coaches are currently working towards Level 3 qualifications
•Developed a Club Angling Programme to develop grass roots provision with over 220 young people participating
per year
•Assisted the three governing bodies to secure ‘fit for purpose’ approval from sportscotland and the Foundation
Equity mark.
ADBoS have secured sportscotland funding (one of a handful of non-Commonwealth Games sports to have done
this ) to support ongoing work to 2015 and will deliver:
•A 10% increase in Club Angling approved clubs
•10% increase in people participating in Club Angling
•50% increase in international level elite anglers
•Delivery of 72 Club Angling programmes by 2015
•Engagement with 60% of the new sportscotland Community Sports Hubs which will embed angling within broader
sport provision across all regions of Scotland.
ADBoS are also:
•DevelopingnewproposalsforsocialinclusionanglingdeliveryandaretargetingCashbackforCommunities
(proceeds of crime) funds to assist with this.
•Supportingcontinuedprofessionaldevelopmentofcoaches.
•WorkingwiththeSQAtolaunchasecondaryschoolsbasedanglingNationalProgressionAwardwhichwillsiton
theScottishCreditandQualiicationsFramework(SCQF)
16
1.2.2 Physical Activity
Angling provides opportunities for many different levels of physical activity for people of all abilities, including
the less able.
‘After a good day’s fishing on a boat I’m exhausted, especially if I’m fishing a competition!’
(Survey comment, 40 year-old male sea angler).
Ensuring the physical health and fitness of communities has become a strategic policy area for national governments. One
of five main policies listed under Healthy Weight, Healthy Lives: A Cross-Government strategy for England (2008) was
a commitment ‘to build physical activity into our lives’7. The Scottish national physical activity strategy, Let’s Make Scotland
More Active8, made a similar commitment when it was launched in 2003.
Whilst often regarded as a sedentary activity, data from the angling participation survey conducted for this research
demonstrates the variation in physical activity that is inherent in angling. The column chart below illustrates the data from the
relevant survey question, which asked respondents to assess the intensity of physical activity usually associated with their
angling participation. Respondents could choose from 3 categories of intensity: low, moderate or high.
Chart 1: Physical Activity Intensity by Type of Angling
7 Department of Health and Department of Children, Schools and Families (2008) Healthy Weight, Healthy Lives: a Cross-Government
Strategy for England, London: Cross-Government Obesity Unit
8 Physical Activity Taskforce (2003) Let’s Make Scotland More Active: A Strategy for Physical Activity. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
17
•While a similar proportion of coarse, sea and game angling respondents (approximately 20%) viewed their participation as
being low intensity physical activity, these were in the minority
•Most anglers viewed their participation as moderate, although this was noticeably less for game anglers than for coarse and
sea anglers.
•Many more game anglers (34.2% of the total) regarded their participation as high intensity physical activity.
It is also possible to contrast the physical activity associated with angling at some of the different settings in which we have
researched angling participation:
•Sitting by a canal in Manchester coarse fishing with bait having driven a car to the location (very low intensity)
•Young people’s GHOF angling event at Charlton’s pond, Billingham (low intensity)
•Fishing the hill lochs of Assynt, Scotland having walked several miles up steep hills to the loch (very high intensity and long
duration)
•The constant moving and casting involved in much fly fishing as observed at a Fishing for Everyone women’s fishing event
(moderate to high intensity)
•Wading in rivers or the sea and constantly casting and retrieving spinners, such as in salmon fishing in Scotland (high
intensity)
•Walking along beaches and clambering over rocks to go sea angling in Northumberland (intermittent moderate intensity)
•Rowing boats to go fishing on a reservoir (intermittent moderate intensity).
Data collected from surveys of, and interviews with, anglers in Assynt, in North West Scotland showed that in some instances
angling can be extremely vigorous. Two sets of survey data collected from anglers in 2009 and 2010 showed that angling
participation was rated as high intensity physical activity by more than 55% of the total sample (n=108). The rugged terrain
and large lochs in the area mean that just getting to a fishing spot (usually by walking or rowing) requires considerable effort.
As the angler describes below, angling can be a significant element of weekly physical exercise:
‘I trout fish on a long length of river. Contrary to popular perceptions of anglers “sitting on baskets” I often walk up to 6
miles in a day’s fishing over varied and sometimes challenging terrain. Whilst I partake of several other forms of exercise
I feel my weekly angling session contributes significantly to my fitness and overall health.’
(Web comment submitted 25/8/11)
However, the measurement of physical activity involved in sports tends to be ‘blanket’ - Sport England’s criteria has been the
number of adults participating in at least 30 minutes of sport at moderate intensity at least three times a week (“3x30”).9 As
such, angling has subsequently been classified as a low intensity activity, but such a classification does not take into account:
•The variation of activity in types and location of angling
•The often long duration but less frequent nature of angling activity
•The relationship of activity intensity to the ability of the individuals taking part
9 Sport England (2010) “One Million” Sports Participation Indicator http://www.sportengland.org/.../idoc.ashx accessed 18th November 2011
1. Angling and Sports Participation
The findings shows that:
18
Physical Activity: Angling’s Distinction
There are a number of ways in which the physical activity involved in angling offers something distinctive from other sports, and
when considered collectively these distinctions demonstrate that angling plays a key role in getting people active, particularly
those who might otherwise fall outside of ‘mainstream’ sports participation. The distinctions are summarised in Table 1 and
suggest that angling:
•Provides opportunities for activity for the less able that many other sports do not
•Needs to be understood in relation to the ability of participants
•Helps keep or encourage people to be active later in life
•Provides sustained duration of physical activity
•Provides opportunities for green exercise with inherent added health benefits.
Distinction
Description
Evidence
i) Angling provides
physical activity for the
less able
Angling can offer many ways to be active
for people with ability impairments.
•Of 128 coarse angling respondent comments
in our survey 33 explained that a disability
impaired their physical activity.
•SportEngland’sSQSEsurveyin200910
showed that 39% of the 1,469 surveyed
anglers had a long-standing illness, disability
or infirmity (80% with affected activity), double
the proportion of other sport respondents
(19%).
ii) Physical activity levels
are relative
Physical activity in angling needs to be
understood as relative and subjective
to the individual concerned – it can, for
example, make relatively inactive people
active.
•Some respondents revealed that angling was
an important part of their recovery from
ill-health; others disclosed that angling was
one of the few activities they could manage
given their physical limitations.
iii) Opportunities for older
people to be active
Compared to other sports, people can
readily participate (and compete) in
angling until late in life.
•The mean age of anglers surveyed in 2009
for our research was 48.9 years
•The average age of respondents in our Assynt
research was 53, with 20% in the 50-54 age
range and 14% aged 45-49 and 14% aged
55-59
•73% of anglers surveyed in the
aforementioned Sport England research were
aged 45 years or more (42% were 55+ years)
iv) Angling provides
sustained physical activity
Angling is often less intense, but longer
in duration than other sports, producing
similar energy use.
•When Pretty et al (2007) compared physical
exertion in angling to six other activities11,
angling was half as vigorous as activities like
mountain biking or horse riding but because of
the longer duration, the total energy used per
session was greater than any other activity.
v) Angling provides
physical activity in green
spaces
Exercise in ‘green spaces’ can have
added value in terms of mental and
physical health.
•Our interim reports have emphasised the
added benefits of activity in angling in terms of
socialisation and environmental awareness.12
•Other research highlighted in Section 2 has
emphasised the mental and physical health
improvements from green exercise.
Table 1: The Distinction of Angling in Providing Physical Activity Outcomes
10 11 12
10 Sport England (2009) SatisfactionwiththeQualityoftheSportingExperience(SQSE)Survey.
11 Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Hine, R., Sellens, M., South, N. and Griffin, M. (2007) ‘Green exercise in the UK countryside: Effects on health and
psychological well-being, and implications for policy and planning’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50: 2, 211 — 231.
12 See the series of project Theme Papers produced as interim reports in 2010 available at www.resources.anglingresearch.org.uk
19
In Focus: Does Angling Make Your Heart Beat Faster?
We were interested in identifying the potential effects that angling participation might have on the heart rate of an
angler. Using a wrist-watch heart rate monitor we asked ‘Thomas’, a member of the Upper Don angling club, to record
a session of fly-fishing on the river at Wharncliffe, near Sheffield. This involved:
•An experienced 37 year old game angler
•Prior benchmarking of heart rate: waking up (47 beats per minute); walking the dog (average of 114 bpm); and
running (163 bpm). Calorie expenditure for the walk was 222 C.
•A fishing session lasting 3 hours 50 minutes and 8 seconds that had a calorie expenditure of 1075 C with an
average heart rate of 102 bpm and a maximum of 151 bpm.
•Heart rates varied significantly dependent on activities - walking along the bank, wading in the river, casting, hooking
and landing fish, missing fish, and disentangling line.
Chart 2, below, shows the changes in heart rate over the first hour of the session.
Chart 2: Measurement of Heart Rate and Activity, Game Angler
Although a basic, one-off exercise, it demonstrates the differentiation of heart rate within one session of one particular
type of angling. For the record, Thomas landed and released a total of 54 fish (brown trout or grayling) during
the session.
1. Angling and Sports Participation
The lesson from this work is that when assessing angling as a source of physical activity there is a need to differentiate in
relation to: (a) the type/discipline of angling being practised; (b) the physical capacity of the individual, and (c) the context/
environment in which participation takes place.
20
1.2.3 Clubs and Sports Infrastructure
Angling provides a national infrastructure of clubs and governing bodies.
Angling has a very large infrastructure of clubs which help develop participation, manage waters, skills and competitions and
generate social value to individuals and communities.
•Our angling participation survey recorded a sample where 73% (n=1,704) of anglers were members of clubs. This is
significantly higher than Sport England’s Active People Survey data from the period 2007-2010 which
put membership at 15-19%13
•The Angling Trust has over 1,500 member clubs.
Membership of clubs varies in terms of motivation and type of angling:
•Our survey suggested that anglers ranked access to waters as the highest club membership motivation with 86% (n=1,994)
ranking it 1st.
•Club membership amongst sea angling respondents was 49% (n=175), with the most popular reason for joining a club ‘to
be around like-minded individuals’ (67%, n=229) – due in part to the lack of private fishing rights for seas and coasts.
As with other sports there has been a drive to improve the running of angling and the governance of the sport. The unification
of governing bodies in England (AT) and the creation of ADBoS in Scotland have improved national governance significantly.
At a club level the ADB have 53 clubs that have been awarded the Clubmark scheme in England.
Angling’s club structure offers a number of social and community benefits:
•Because angling takes place in natural environments, angling clubs frequently get involved in environmental improvement
work through working parties, something discussed more fully in Section 3
•Because of the nature of the sport, angling clubs can be a gateway to charitable, community and education work
•Angling clubs can also be a route to a wide range of other activities that form a broader scope of participation.
In Focus: National Fishing Month (www.nationalfishingmonth.com)
National Fishing Month14 is an annual event that promotes angling through the provision of hundreds of showcase
and local events designed to introduce people to fishing. It seeks to encourage people of all ages, and especially
families, to try angling regardless of the cultural or social background they come from.
We conducted bespoke research on both NFM 2010 and 201115. In the 2011 event:
•There were 15,000 people were engaged in 326 events
•The events brought together people of all ages from 2 year olds to pensioners
•46.7% of participants were in the 10-15 age range with over 10% over 40
•24.6% of participants were female (compared to around 5% nationally)
•14% of participants were from the top 20% most deprived areas
13 Sport England (2010) Active People Survey (APS) results for Angling. Period: APS3 (Oct 08/Oct 09) to APS4 (Oct 09/Oct 10). In
part the difference was a bias in our survey, which was promoted heavily to the memberships of the angling national governing bodies in
England and Scotland.
14 NFM is owned and run by the Angling Trades Association and supported by the Environment Agency, Angling Development Board,
Professional Anglers Association and Angling Trust.
15 Brown, A et al (2010) National Fishing Month 2010: Key statistics, Manchester: Substance; Brown, A et al (2011) National Fishing Month
2011: Key statistics, Manchester: Substance; both available at: www.resources.anglingresearch.org.uk
21
Beyond the act of going fishing, angling is a gateway for a wide range of positive social and environmental activities.
Through ‘unpicking’ what is involved in angling participation, we found that anglers were involved in a wide array of other
activities, not immediately associated with the act of fishing. Certain qualities of angling participation set it apart from
mainstream sports in terms of the scope of additional activities involved.
•The ownership of fishing rights by clubs means they take on additional responsibilities and provide opportunities for
anglers to undertake different tasks.
•Angling’s reliance on wildlife and nature means that anglers have a vested interest in maintaining the quality of the
angling environment.
•The social structures and cultures of angling lend themselves to widespread interchange about the activity – coaching,
teaching and debating on the internet.
•The accessibility of angling can lead to intergenerational learning and integrated participation.
Our angling participation survey asked anglers to comment about additional activities they undertook. Chart 3 indicates the
levels of participation in these activities, and the ‘word cloud’16 in Figure 1 is used to visualise thirty of the most-frequently
occurring roles: club themes were present in the highest number of comments (26), and activities involving writing about
angling was the next most frequently occurring theme (21 comments).
Theme
Activities
Tackle & Bait
Tying your own flies
Preparing and maintaining tackle and rigs
Game
Angling
Sea
Angling
Count (%)
Count (%)
Count (%)
136 (10%)
415 (68%)
61 (17%)
612 (26%)
1206 (85%)
319 (52%)
312 (87%)
1837 (77%)
857 (60%)
89 (15%)
200 (56%)
1146 (48%)
Buying/reading angling books and magazines
1183 (83%)
507 (83%)
290 (81%)
1980 (83%)
Watching angling-related television and
films
1100 (77%)
428 (70%)
277 (77%)
1805 (76%)
Reading and/or contributing to angling
blogs, internet discussion boards and
websites
824 (58%)
342 (56%)
240 (67%)
1406 (59%)
Contributing to environmental or aquatic
habitat conservation projects
291 (20%)
232 (38%)
70 (20%)
593 (25%)
Teaching and mentoring other anglers
282 (20%)
177 (29%)
71 (20%)
530 (22%)
Attending angling club meetings or
undertaking angling club business
609 (43%)
299 (49%)
135 (38%)
1043 (44%)
Paid employment in an angling-related field
87 (6%)
69 (11%)
21 (6%)
177 (7%)
I do not take part in any of these activities
19 (1%)
8 (1%)
3 (1%)
30 (1%)
Other (please specify in the text box below)
78 (5%)
51 (8%)
31 (9%)
160 (7%)
1422
612
358
2392
Collecting/preparing and maintaining
your own bait
Media
Voluntary
Economic
Coarse
Angling
Answered question
Chart 3: Cross Tabulation of Types of Angling and Additional Activities Undertaken
16 A word cloud uses the size of words to signify their frequency/importance.
Count of all
Responses
(%)
1. Angling and Sports Participation
1.2.4 Extended Participation
22
Figure 1: Word Cloud of Angling Participation ‘Activities’. Count of themes: club (26), writing (21), making (13), committees
(11), website (11) [...] youth (3).
Respondents also spoke about contributing to programmes and initiatives that have the potential to deliver wider community
and environmental benefits, such as pond development, running charity groups, environmental rehabilitation work and the
mentoring of other anglers:
‘My friend who is disabled requires lots of help with mobility as well as some tasks such as setting up rods, mixing
ground bait, some more difficult casting and help netting fish so I am part-mentor and part-helper.’
(Survey comment made by 62-year old male coarse angler)
1.2.5 Competition
Angling provides opportunities for structured contests as well as distinctive informal competition.
Like other sports, angling embraces local club, regional and national competitions. Organised competition helps to provide
structure to the sport of angling and is a pathway for talent and skill development. Competition development is a growing area
of work for the Angling Trust, and angling development agencies and projects find it very popular with young people. New,
emerging forms of angling, such as ‘street fishing’, are specifically designed around competition because it is attractive to
young people.
Some clubs are committed to providing as many competition opportunities for members as possible. For example, in 2009
Wakefield Angling Club – ‘one of the case study sites for this research’ – ran a general match programme for adult members
from March to December, and supplemented this with separate match programmes for juniors/intermediates, veterans, ladies,
disabled anglers, charity events, Monday evenings and a 3-day festival in August 17.
Part of the ADB’s funding is for the development of improving elite pathways and its work has involved:
•158 anglers involved in three pilot regional talent programmes in 2011
•Developing a process for the selection and training of competition coaches
•An agreed link for selection from the talent pathway into the national youth teams
•9 regional competitions and 3 super regional talent programmes scheduled in 2012/13
The data from our angling participation survey indicated that while formal competition was not the strongest motivation for
joining a club, it was still deemed important. As Table 2 below shows, a total of 636 respondents (approximately 25%) ranked
competition as either their 1st, 2nd or 3rd most important reason for joining an angling club.
17 Wakefield Angling Club (2009) Members’ Year Book, 1st January – 31st December 2009.
23
Count of Anglers
(n=2329)
1st
156
6.7%
2nd
270
11.6%
3rd
210
9.0%
Table 2: Ranking for Competition as Motivation for Joining Club
However, like other mass-participation activities such as cycling and walking (also formalised and codified into competition),
much angling participation appears leisurely or recreational rather than as competitive sport.
Angling’s Distinction as a Competitive Sport
Angling differs as a competitive sport in a number of respects, particularly in enabling accessible,
integrated competition.
i) Integrated Competition
Angling is one of the few sports where individuals with very different characteristics and abilities can genuinely compete on
similar terms against each other. Short or tall, male or female, able-bodied or disabled, young or old – angling is a sport that
truly is within the capabilities of many people. The reasons for this include:
•The simple physical mechanics of angling (which can be varied through the equipment used and the type of angling
discipline practised)
•The role that environmental conditions, and chance, can play in catching a fish or not which can effectively ‘level the
playing field’.
This is not to say that experience, skill level and elite training and development do not count in angling. However, because
angling supports a ‘mixed’ profile of individuals participating alongside one another, there are legitimate opportunities for:
•Families to participate in sport together (i.e. as a unit)
•Competitions that involve males and females
•Participation involving able-bodied and disabled people
•Greater intergenerational interaction
An example of the integrated sociability offered through mixed participation is illustrated in the quote below:
‘Fishing with [my dad] gave me time to learn about him as a man, his values and morals etc….. Since that time I have
taken my own children fishing, and now I take my grand-children too. Fishing gives us quality time together... Angling
is a family event in my own circle, but it can also bring together people of many and varied backgrounds and cultures,
able and less-able [bodied] people can mix and socialise on equal terms whilst fishing.’
(Online comment received 27th July, 2011)
In Focus: Helping Mates get to Matches
At Wakefield Angling Club, anglers over the age of 65 years participate in matches alongside anglers with a disability.
This policy has enabled anglers with a disability to receive assistance from able-bodied anglers to transport and
set up equipment. Six anglers were interviewed at one of these matches, four of whom were restricted by a mix of
disabilities that included knee replacements, gastro-intestinal illness and heart ailments. One of the able-bodied
anglers over 65 (and retired) explained his commitment to helping his peers:
‘One of the reasons I come is – as well as enjoying it – to give some of them [fellow anglers] a hand with the gear.
If they’ve got bad breathing, they can soon knacker themselves up ... I enjoy fishing and I can help someone who
might otherwise struggle.’
A similar response was made by a coarse angler in the general angling participation survey who, despite being over
60 years of age himself, assumed the role of an assistant to a fellow angler.
1. Angling and Sports Participation
Rank
24
ii) Informal Competition
The challenge of catching fish, the leisure context of angling and the sometimes slow/fast nature of participation often mean
that competition is more informal, involving friends and family.
‘It’s also nice to have competitions between friends and family for fun; [however] a lot of local/club matches I find are too
serious and involve having to stay silent and get more bait for those hours than what I’d normally use in a month, and to
me it’s not really enjoyable. Although, I do fish some [angling club matches] occasionally for something to do.
(Survey comment made by 18 year-old male coarse angler.)
‘Angling is a way of life to me, not simply a sport or a competition, and all I ask is for the right of quiet enjoyment.’ (Survey
comment made by 48 year-old male sea angler.)
ResultsfromSportEngland’sSQSEsurveyindicatethatthisviewofanglingasnon-competitiveisinfactwidespread–itwas
reported that 74% of 1,469 respondents (481 general participants and 988 affiliated club members) participated in ‘noncompetition social’ angling. Our interviews with anglers found this kind of ‘social angling’ often embraced informal competition
amongst friends, against one’s self, or with a particular fish species. The informal competitive appeal of angling can be
considered a driver of increasing sports participation – offering an alternative to hi-octane sports and appealing to those
seeking relaxation, those suffering mental health issues, and young people disenfranchised or alienated by other sports.
In Focus: Formal and Informal Competition - Attracting Young People
Recognising the difference between formal and informal competition in angling is particularly important for increasing
participation amongst young people.
On one hand formal club competitions and new forms of angling developing in continental Europe, like competitive
Street Fishing, are attracting young people to the sport. The ADB report that clubs and schools find formal
competitions engage some young people.
On the other hand some of our research has found that angling appeals to many young people precisely because it
allows them to escape the overt competitiveness of traditional school sports.18 This distinction can be seen in angling
clubs set up by young people themselves, such as Little Windsor Angling Club and Staffordshire Youth Anglers.19
Both clubs incorporate competitions into their activities, but they are keen to stress angling is primarily a social
activity, a chance for friendly matches as opposed to what they consider to be the pressures of more serious training
and competition in other angling clubs.
Because angling can appeal to both those seeking formal competition and elite pathways as well as those seeking
more informal social experiences, it is important that clubs accommodate both types of angler.
18 Djohari, N. (2010b) In Their Own Words: Young People’s Angling Experiences Part 2: Maximising the Benefits of Angling Participation,
Manchester: Substance. http://resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/sites/resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/files/young_people_Part2_
barriers_2010.pdf
19 ibid
25
Other distinctions in terms of angling competition include:
•The nature of the opposition: This can be another team or individual, but they are not fundamental to participation, and for
many participants angling competition is a contest with the fish and the elements.
•Definitions of success: Catching fish is an instantly gratifying demonstration of success. This can be particularly appealing
to young people, especially those with low confidence in their own abilities (see Section 6).
•Types of competition: Alongside catching fish, casting competitions (for example at Highland Games) provides a skill
challenge based on distance and accuracy akin to archery or target shooting.
•Chance: Because angling takes place in the natural environment and involves fish, it is subject to environmental influences,
there is a level of unpredictability which makes it accessible to the non-expert.
1.2.6 Barriers to Participation
Some barriers to angling participation still need to be overcome.
Despite very high participation numbers, a number of barriers exist to prevent even more people taking up angling. These have
been identified in other research20 and include:
•Not knowing what to do
•Not having equipment
•Not having someone to go fishing with
•Not being able to access fishing locations.
Such barriers can be overcome: for example the EA’s production and distribution of regional guides to fishing locations in
2008/09 led to a 12% increase in licence sales.
Young people face some particular barriers. In our survey of 219 young people, 96.3% said they would like to go fishing
more often, but only 52.7% agreed that it was easy for them to go fishing when they wanted to. Table 3 below illustrates some
of the most common barriers to angling participation identified in our Young Anglers’ survey and suggested remedies21.
Barrier
Recommendations
1. Lack of junior angling clubs and coaching events.
Increase high quality provision of junior clubs and coaching
events for non club members.22
2. Can’t travel to venue on their own, particularly when
fisheries are located out of towns.
Local Authorities should improve access to local waters and
make leasing of waters conditional on junior access.23
3. Clubs too dominated by match fishing and competitions.
Provide a diversity of club activities with formal competition
and informal participation.
4. Poor disability provision and lack of toilet facilities (cited
by girls in particular).
Develop accessible fisheries and provide access to toilets.
Arrange mixed participation angling events.
5. Non angling parents do not know how to take children
fishing and fisheries are not always welcoming to family
groups.
Encourage family friendly fisheries e.g. family tickets, fun
days and coaching or parent packs.24
222324
Table 3: The Top 5 Barriers to Young People’s Angling Participation
20 Environment Agency (2004) Our Nations Fisheries Bristol: Environment Agency
21 For more detail of our Young People Angling Survey see Djohari, N (2010b) op cit.
22 For example of good practice see Worksop and District Angling Association in Djohari, N (2009). Angling and Young People. Interim
Report 2009, Manchester: Substance p26 http://resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/sites/resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/files/Research_
Task_2_Angling_and_Young_People.pdf
23 For more detailed recommendations for Local Authorities see Brown, A., Djohari, D. and Stolk, P (2011) Making the Most of Community
Waters: Localism, Health and Angling, Manchester: Substance. http://resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/sites/resources.anglingresearch.
org.uk/files/Making_the_most_of_community_waters.pdf
24 Cob House in Worcestershire is an excellent example of this. Reviewed in Djohari, N (forthcoming, 2012) ‘Re-imaging the Role of the
Fishery: Angling Intervention work with young people’ paper presented to World Recreational Fishing Conference, Berlin August 3rd 2011.
Available from author.
1. Angling and Sports Participation
iii) Other Distinctions
26
The cost of participation: is an additional barrier to young people, particularly at the threshold between junior and adult
ages. Reviewing the numbers of young people holding junior EA Rod licenses that were eligible to transfer to adult licenses
in the upcoming 2009-10 season, we found only 34.4% renewed, amounting to a ‘drop-off’ of 65.6%.25 While the increase in
EA rod license fees from £5 for junior to £25 for adults cannot alone explain the drop off, young people told us that it was the
combined cost of Rod Licence fees, adult fees for club membership and adult day water charges that was prohibitive for those
turning 16.
‘I believe that membership prices for people still in education should be the same price as a juniors because they do not
work and therefore struggle to find the money they need. Another of my local clubs requested that because I am 16 I
need to pay £30 instead of the £6 I paid last year.’
(Survey respondent: Male, 16)
Reducing cost certainly has the potential to increase participation.
•The introduction of the £5 junior license fee in 2001 resulted in the dramatic increase of license sales to 12-16 yr olds
from 30,000 to 110,00026.
•The Angling Trust has sought to address cost as an issue by making junior membership free to ages 17 and under, and
by introducing a reduced cost young adult membership fee for 18-21 year olds.
1.3 Issues and Recommendations
1.3.1 Physical Activity
The benefits from physical activity in angling need to be better understood, measured in more sophisticated and nuanced
ways, and evaluated in terms relative to those taking part. The ‘blanket’ means by which sports are judged to qualify for
funding, i.e. based on short, intensive participation (the ‘3x30minutes’ assessment), is simply inappropriate for angling (as well
as other outdoor activities including sailing, mountaineering and canoeing), where participation is usually for longer duration
but often less frequency. Some assessments (such as Pretty et al) suggest that the long duration of angling participation
results in higher levels of calorie burn than other outdoor activities.
1.3.2 Participation Figures and Funding
Developments in the organisational structures that support angling participation – especially the changing role of the EA and
a new strategic plan for Sport England in 2012 – suggest that some uncertain times lie ahead. Currently, angling is ranked at
29 in terms of sports funding (0.4% of available funding) yet Sport England’s calculations place angling as:
•The 6th highest monthly participation sport (970,000)
•16th in weekly participation at moderate intensity (138,000)
•Having the 3rd most satisfied participants in all sports
More accurate and appropriate ways of determining participation levels, duration and benefits that reflect the distinction
that angling offers, should inform future funding decisions. Angling should remain within the funding framework of sports
participation as it offers many of the same benefits and routes as other sports.
In Scotland, angling is somewhat better placed with the ADBoS having secured funding from Sport Scotland to 2015.
However, all angling governing bodies also need to seek to broaden the base on which participation development is funded.
Utilising the outcomes and findings of this research, which highlights the range of social and community benefits angling can
deliver, should help inform those new approaches.
25 Djohari, N. (2010b) op cit
26 Mawle, G presentation to ADB workshop, Strelley Hall, Nottingham December 15th 2011.
27
Whilst angling delivers key sports participation outcomes, by analysing angling participation within a rigid sports/exercise
framework, many of the benefits that come from participation are unrecognised within formal funding structures and
assessments. Our research suggests that a broader notion of what constitutes ‘participation’ is required of the full range and
extent of social benefits from a sport such as angling are to be understood.
In order to help achieve this however, angling needs to be better at accounting for participation; at monitoring and evaluating
impact and at demonstrating how it meets sports based outcomes.
1.3.4 Young People
The fluctuating nature of angling participation – an angler’s ‘career’ – in which participation most frequently begins young,
may dip between the ages of 18–40 years of age, then return later in life, emphasises the importance of an early introduction.
With severe financial challenges for young people and the government’s commitment to increase the leaving age from
education and training to 18 by 2015, eliminating cost as a potential barrier to young people’s continued participation in
angling needs to be a priority. Overcoming barriers for young people to participate is an essential component of securing
future participation levels.
1. Angling and Sports Participation
1.3.3 Full Benefits of Participation Unrecognised
28
2. Angling and Health
and Well-Being
In Brief
This section describes the positive role that angling plays in improving public health and wellbeing. Angling offers specific health and well-being benefits:
•As an informal recreational activity that can build resilience against ill health through
opportunities for relaxation, relief from stress, improved physical activity and access to natural
environments.
•As part of targeted intervention programmes that assist in the restoration and recovery from
physical and mental ill health
2.1 Introduction and Context
Improving health and well-being is a priority across policy areas because it can positively impact on wider outcomes in
education, employment, and social exclusion. Two recent papers, No Health Without Mental Health27 and Confident
Communities: Brighter Futures28, call for a cross-departmental approach to improve the mental health and well-being of both
vulnerable individuals and the general population. These papers stress the need for an integrated approach to mental and
physical health that recognises the importance of:
•Connected communities
•Purposeful participation
•Building the strength and resilience of both people and communities
•A ‘whole life course’ approach to achieving health and well-being.
Angling makes a distinctive contribution to health and well-being in three ways:
i) It incorporates a range of physical activity levels and encourages activity amongst the inactive, those recovering from
illness and older age groups who may not participate in other sports.
ii) It incorporates therapeutic engagement and contact with ‘blue-green spaces’, and as a consequence helps maintain
positive mental health, provides stress relief and can support programmes for people experiencing mental illness.
iii) It provides a rich social world that facilitates the relationship building, connection and participation in social life essential
to securing well-being and active ageing.
Evidence our project has generated about angling’s contribution to health and well-being comes from our angling participation
survey, over 150 in-depth interviews with anglers, research visits to projects that employ angling as a tool to intervene in
physical and mental health, and an online comment facility that collected anglers’ personal interpretations of the health and
well-being benefits of their participation. Indeed, improved health and well-being has been one of the most cited personal
benefits of angling during the project, for young and old alike.
27 Department of Health (2011) No Health Without Mental Health: A cross government mental health outcomes strategy for people
of all ages, London DoH
28 Department of Health (2010) Confident Communities: Brighter Futures. A framework for developing well-being , London DoH
29
Well-being is a dynamic, multi-dimensional state relating to how people feel and function in life.29 It takes into
account:
•Subjective well-being (how people think and feel about the quality of their lives)
•Psychological well-being (the ability to cope with stress, self-esteem, sense of purpose)
•Physical health and sense of bodily wellness
•A sense of connection to people, communities and the environment.
Consequently, well-being is more than the absence of mental or physical illness, or the satisfaction of basic needs, as
it takes into account a wide range of domains that enable people to live happy, healthy, productive lives.
The UK public health white paper, Healthy Lives, Healthy People30 sets out an increased role for local authorities in
encouraging active ageing and the development of communities for well-being that facilitate greater access to green
spaces. Towards a Mentally Flourishing Scotland31 places particular emphasis on active citizenship, and calls for
the Third Sector in Scotland to innovate new approaches and interventions for health and well-being. Overall, both
the Scottish and English policies echo the findings of the 2010 Marmot Review into health inequalities, which drew
attention to the importance of combating social isolation, providing access to restorative local environments and the
role of positive social networks in improving health and well-being outcomes.32
2.2 Angling’s Contribution to Health and Well-being
2.2.1 Physical Health
Angling contributes to preventative and restorative measures by increasing physical activity and providing programmes
that assist in recovery from physical illness.
Although we have already discussed some aspects of angling and physical activity in Section 1, it is worth highlighting
the distinctive health benefits here.
i) Physical Activity and Health
The World Health Organisation (WHO) recognises physical inactivity as the fourth leading risk factor in global mortality33.
Only 39% of adults are meeting recommended physical activity targets in Scotland34, while in England 39% of men and 29%
of women35 are meeting them. Approximately 23% of adults in England36 and 28.2% in Scotland37 are considered obese.
Without intervention, by 2050 obesity is expected to rise to 60% for men and 50% for women and will cost society £49.9
billion per year.38 Crucially, for those who are inactive, the ability to gradually increase duration, frequency and intensity over
time is critical in order to reach activity goals.
29 Newton, J. (2007 ) Well-being and the Natural Environment. A brief overview of the evidence, University of Surrey
http://www3.surrey.ac.uk/resolve/seminars/Julie%20Newton%20Paper.pdf
30 Department of Health (Nov 2010) Healthy Lives, Healthy People: Our strategy for public health in England, London: DoH.
31 Scottish Government (May 2009) Towards a mentally Flourishing Scotland: Policy and Action Plan 2009-11, Edinburgh: Scottish
Government
32 Marmot Review (2010) Fair Society, Healthy Lives: A Strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010
33 World Health Organisation (2010) Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. To improve and maintain physical health, the
WHO recommends minimum targets of 60 minutes moderate to vigorous intensity activity a day for young people (aged 5-17 years), and
150 minutes of moderate aerobic activity throughout the week for 18-64 years and those aged 65 years or over.
34 Scottish Government. (2011) Scottish Health Survey 2010.
35 The Health and Social Care Information Centre (2010) Statistics on obesity, physical activity and diet: England, 2010.
36 NHS Information Centre (Dec2010) Heath Survey for England 2009: Health and Lifestyle Leeds: The NHS Information Centre
37 Scottish Government (Sept 2011) Scottish Health Survey 2010, Edinburgh: Scottish Government
38 Foresight (2007) Tackling Obesities: Future Choices Final Report
2. Angling and Health and Well-Being
In Focus: What is Well-Being?
30
Due to the variability of physical activity levels possible in angling, it is a sport that delivers a means by which inactive people
can become more active. Angling allows for gradual increases in participation frequency, duration and intensity as confidence,
fitness and skills develop. This characteristic makes it particularly accessible to individuals who are inactive or have underlying
disabilities with limited opportunities for physical activity and it is these individuals who are most at risk from poor well-being
due to low activity. By moderating technique or location, anglers are able to remain physically active long after their ability to
participate in other sports and leisure activities has declined.
In our participation survey, more than half of the sample (52%) rated their participation in angling as important, very important
or extremely important to them being physically active.39 It also offers opportunities to build up activity and for older people to
get active:
‘I broke my back in an accident. After a few operations I started to walk. I was told to try and get some exercise and build
slowly. I went with my brother salmon fishing. I only watched to start but after a year of doing this I started to fish myself,
two or three casts to start with, slowly building my stamina. I honestly believe that without the exercise I got from angling
I would be in a wheel chair. I am not alone - my surgeons think the same.’ (Web comment submitted 23/07/11)
[I have] walked more than eight miles in a fishing match, made a 600ft cliff descent and subsequent ascent and
weighed myself before and after a hard bait digging session and recorded a 4½ lb weight loss. Angling is as physical as
you want to make it.’ (Survey comment made by 61-year old male sea angler)
Furthermore, angling creates opportunities for physical exercise in ‘green’ or ‘natural environment’ settings. Research by the
University of Essex40 has emphasised that ‘green exercise’ can lead to:
•Improved psychological wellbeing by enhancing mood and self-esteem
•Improved recovery from physical illness
•The facilitation of social networking and creativity
Mental health charity MIND, the Countryside Recreation Network and research by Pretty et al (2006) have all identified these
additional benefits of taking exercise in natural/green spaces in their work.41
ii) Recovery from Physical Illness
While angling can help increase the physical health of the general population by raising levels of physical activity, it can also
have specific benefits for those recovering from ill health. A growing body of research has pointed to the positive effects of
green environments on physical recovery,42 and many hospital and outreach programmes now include green activities such as
horticulture to facilitate patient recovery.43
Recovery is both a physical and mental process. Reflecting this, angling provides opportunities to assist recovery from
physical health problems in three ways:
•Increased physical movement
•Psychological benefits of being in green environments
•Increased social connection
‘As an 82 year old man with cancer, I feel it an effort to get motivated to get out and about. However, when fly fishing
a still water I very much enjoy the technique involved in making high-quality casts, the thrill of the take of a fish, the
pleasure of being out of doors in a rural environment, and the kindness of strangers (mostly elderly men who feel as I
do) on the waterside.” (Web comment submitted 16/09/2011)
While people can access the restorative benefits of angling through their own recreational participation, many projects now
also offer targeted programmes of support.
39 Stolk, P. (2009) Angling Participation Interim Report 2009, Manchester: Substance, p30
http://resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/sites/resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/files/Research_Task_1_Angling_Participation.pdf
40 Pretty op cit
41 Mind (2007) Ecotherapy: The green agenda for mental health, Mind Week report May 2007; Countryside Recreation Network (2005) A
countryside for health and wellbeing: The physical and mental health benefits of green exercise; Pretty, J., Hine, R. and Peacock, J. (2006)
‘Green exercise: The benefits of activities in green places’, The Biologist, 53 (3), 143-148.
42 Newton, J. (2007) op cit
43 For example, see the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital’s therapy garden
http://www.rnoh.nhs.uk/clinical-services/rehabilitation-and-therapy/occup/therapy-garden
31
Angling is also being successfully used to work with people who have experienced strokes, where participation in angling is
an opportunity not only to improve motor function and dexterity, but also to reconnect with society and begin to focus on the
positive experiences in their lives.
In Focus: Angling and Stroke Recovery in Tameside
‘Sometimes when people have a stroke the world becomes a very small place – often the front room of their home
– and depression kicks in.’
Three years ago the Stroke Association’s Tameside and Glossop Information, Advice and Support Service,46
decided to ‘test the water’ and feature angling as an activity for people of working age. Joyce Booth from the Stroke
Association explained the impetus behind starting these sessions:
‘We want to engage people in as many activities as we can. The benefit of fishing would be to get out and about in
the fresh air, and to see something different...I also think it was just about offering something to people that wasn’t
focused on their disability, and to show them something that they could do, and could achieve, with as much or as
little support as they need.’
The decision proved to be far more successful than the service team thought possible. The Tameside and Glossop
service now works closely with Tameside angling organisation Friends of Catch Nature,47 and together they have
developed sites with facilities that meet the special needs of their client group. Demand for angling sessions amongst
those recovering from strokes has been consistently strong, prompting an increase in sessions from 3-4 outings per
year to one a week during the summer months.
The Tameside and Glossop team identify angling participation as providing particular benefits for stroke survivors.
These include physical improvements such as increased muscle strength, improved co-ordination and exercise,
along with improvements to mental and emotional well-being through skill development, socialisation and
opportunities to relax.
44 Casting for Recovery was founded in 1996 in Vermont, US. In 2007, Casting for Recovery UK/Ireland was established.
45 From data collected in interviews with members of Casting for Recovery.
46 See the Stroke Association website, http://www.stroke.org.uk/in_your_area/services_map/tameside_and_1.html accessed 5 December
2011.
47 See Friends of Catch Nature website, http://www.catchnature.co.uk/index.html accessed 5 December 2011.
2. Angling and Health and Well-Being
Casting for Recovery44 is a programme that encourages women who have experienced breast cancer to take part in fly
fishing. Physical activity is used to strengthen muscles and increase movement and confidence following surgery. However,
the benefits extend beyond the physiological; women find social support in their shared experiences and the camaraderie of
angling, as well as a positive mental focus on wellness and having fun.45
32
2.2.2 Angling’s Contribution to Mental Health
Angling makes both a preventative and restorative contribution to mental health.
Angling can assist mental health in two principal ways: by providing an activity that helps the development of positive mental
health in participants; and as an activity that is used in a targeted way to treat mental health problems.
i) Promoting Positive Mental Health
Angling introduces protective factors that promote good mental health.
Positive mental health describes a positive state of being rather than just the absence of mental illness.48 Developing
protective factors, such as resilience and coping skills, as well as a network of social support, helps to maintain positive
mental health.
Across the country many people already make use of angling to maintain positive mental health. In our survey of 2,400 anglers,
87% identified rest and relaxation as an important motivation for angling participation, with 30% citing rest and relaxation as
‘extremely important’.49 90% of surveyed anglers also claimed escaping crowds and noise was an important, very important or
extremely important part of their angling experience50.
48 World Health Organisation (2010) Mental Health: Strengthening our Response. Fact Sheet No 220
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs220/en/index.html
49 Stolk, P. (2009) op cit :30.
50 ibid
33
Feature
Benefit
Angler response
Escape and
‘Getting Away’
Fishing provides an opportunity to ‘take time
out’ and ‘get away’ from busy fast moving
lives. It removes people both physically and
mentally from the stresses of their day to day
environments.
‘Being in the country away from the hustle
bustle of fast track living is a great thing, even if
it is sitting on the banks of a canal as it passes
through a town or city. The noises and sounds
take you to another place and the speed of life
slows down.’
Attention and
Fascination
Angling ‘fascinates’ attention, allowing
people to concentrate for long periods of
time seemingly effortlessly. As they become
completely absorbed there is no room for
other thoughts and the singular focus serves
as a mental break.52
‘Fishing provides me with total escape from
other worries. I am 100% absorbed in the art of
casting, the movement of the water, the weather
and the environment around me. It’s a great
stress buster: there’s no space left for thinking
of other things.’
Relaxation and
Excitement
The relaxation of engaging in an enjoyable
repetitive activity is punctuated by moments
of excitement and the anticipation of catching.
This holds interest, encouraging people to
participate for longer, reaping the benefits
of taking time out to relax without becoming
bored.
‘Angling provides a distraction to the stresses
of modern living. It requires long periods of
concentration to adapt techniques to ever
changing conditions. Relaxation comes from
intense concentration whilst excitement arises
from the anticipation and the unpredictability of
catching.’
Access to Nature
Escaping into green spaces and feeling close
and connected to nature boosts feelings of
well-being, improving mood and enabling
people to find respite from life stresses.53
‘I cannot imagine anything else that allows such
an escape - it is the ultimate means of levelling
out from stress for me. Fresh air, exercise ,
stimulation and a feeling of being ‘at one with
nature ‘ all contribute to a very necessary
experience in today’s world.’
Achievement and
Purpose
Active learning and developing skills can
provide a sense of purpose and motivation,
increase opportunities for achievement and
boost self-esteem.
‘The only time I get to completely unwind is
when we are fishing. A day out with mates, a
laugh, being close to nature and sometimes a
few fish. Never anything big or record breaking
but it still brings a sense of achievement and
well-being. Can you put a price on this? I don’t
think so!’
5253
Table 4: Distinctive Features of Angling Contributing to Positive Mental Health
51 Kaplan, S. (2001) ‘Meditation, Restoration and the Management of Mental Fatigue’ In Environment and Behaviour Vol. 33, p482-506
52 This is a feature of restorative environments described as essential for mental restoration, ibid
53 This echoes research on the impact of green environments for improved mental health. Newton, J. (2007).
2. Angling and Health and Well-Being
Angling provides opportunities to escape from daily stress and moments for respite and restoration. Research suggests
mental restoration is best achieved through environments and activities that provide breaks from the effort of sustaining tired
cognitive patterns.51 Amongst the data from our angler interviews, online comments and survey, angling was clearly described
as having many of the distinct features of mentally restorative environments that contribute to the maintenance of positive
mental health as outlined in Table 4.
34
ii) Assisting Treatment and Recovery from Mental Illness
Angling provides programmes that assist in the treatment and recovery from mental illness.
a) Informal
At any one time, approximately 16% of adults and 10% of children are affected by common mental health disorders such as
depression and anxiety.54 The most recent estimates suggest this costs £105 billion per year in England once all the wider
impacts are considered.55 In Scotland recent estimates of the social and economic cost of mental illness are in the region of
£10.7 billion.56 Finding effective ways to assist in the recovery of people from mental ill-health is consequently an important
concern for the whole of society.
A significant body of work is emerging to explore how green environments, particular those that include water57, can improve
mood and self-esteem and stave off mild forms of depression and anxiety.58 Increased physical activity has also been shown to
have a positive effect on improving mood and reducing symptoms of mild to moderate depression and anxiety.59 Participation
in angling capitalises on both these benefit areas, while also incorporating a number additional benefits for those suffering
from mental ill-health. These include:
•Escape and respite from stressful environments
•Reduced isolation and reconnection with living things (fish, nature, other people)
•Increased access to blue-green environments that improve mood and self-esteem.
•Increased engagement in physical activity
•Opportunities to rebuild relationships with carers or families through positive, shared participation that does not focus
on illness
•Sense of achievement and independence from others
•Confirmation of capabilities and immediate sense of gratification and success
•Participation in a calming, therapeutic activity.
As one sea angler explained:
‘When my mental health deteriorates I am able to ”escape” and go fishing. The solitude of the sea shore, the sound of
the waves, and the need to concentrate on watching for a bite clears my mind of negative thoughts, fixing me back into a
happier frame of mind. Alternatively when I’m hyper manic the slow rhythm of fly casting and the need to carefully stalk
my quarry brings me back down into a calm state.’ (Web comment submitted 13/07/2011)
b) Targeted Intervention Programmes
While the aforementioned health benefits are accessible through angling participation more generally, organisations are
increasingly beginning to provide targeted intervention programmes for people experiencing mental ill-health.
The mental health charity MIND incorporated angling into their Get Active programme in Worthing, West Sussex60. The Get
Active programme aims to improve mental and physical health through a variety of exercise and physical activities. Stephen,
one of the regular Get Active participants, explained how the ‘peaceful, relaxing’ experience of going fishing ‘takes your mind
off [the passing of] time’. By contrast, a day at home presents certain mental challenges. Going fishing removes Stephen from
his usual domestic setting – a place where anxiety attacks can be triggered by a ringing telephone or knock at the door – and
delivers him to a tranquil environment where he has greater control over the amount of interaction he has with other people.
54 Foresight (2008) Mental Capital and Well-being: making the most of ourselves in the 21st Century.
55 Department of Health (Feb 2011) No Health Without Mental Health: A cross-government mental health outcomes strategy for people
of all ages London: DoH, p10
56 The Scottish Association for Mental Health (2011) What’s it worth now? The social and economic costs of mental health in Scotland
57 Pretty and J. Barton. (2010) ‘What is the Best Dose of Green Exercise for Improving Mental Health?’, in Environmental Science and
Technology, Vol. 44 (10) p 3947–3955
58 Newton (2007:23); Mind (2007) Ecotherapy: The green agenda for mental health.
http://www.mind.org.uk/campaigns_and_issues/report_and_resources/835_ecotherapy
59 Baker, L.A, Cahalin, L.P., Gerst, K. and Burr, J.A. (2005). ‘Productive activities and subjective well-being among older adults: the influence
of number of activities and time commitment’, Social Indicators Research 73, pp. 431-458.
60 Stolk, P. (2010) Interim Theme Paper 2:Angling and personal Health and Well-being, Manchester: Substance http://www.resources.
anglingresearch.org.uk/sites/resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/files/Theme_Paper_2_Angling_and_Personal_Health_and_Well-being.pdf
35
Both of these examples illustrate the potential role angling can play in supporting targeted mental health provisions.
Opportunities for this type of involvement would be greatly increased by developing stronger links between angling and mental
health organisations and institutions at local, regional and national levels.
In Focus: Working with Anxiety Disorders
In the UK, 4.4% or 195,000 young people aged 11-16 have an anxiety disorder.62 A further 3.6% of 16-24 year olds
are thought to have a generalized anxiety disorder.63 Anxiety can be complicated by low-confidence and self-esteem,
feelings of not fitting in, experiences of bullying, or isolation and limited friendship networks. In young people anxiety
can manifest as panic attacks, agoraphobia, or obsessive compulsive disorder, triggered by stressful social situations
such as meeting new people or going to school.
Youth intervention project Get Hooked On Fishing (GHOF), has found angling particularly effective for working
with young people with anxiety disorders because angling introduces them to a calming activity that can be used to
minimize anxiety during engagement sessions. As a result workers are able to discuss difficult issues or introduce
young people to social situations that would otherwise potentially trigger anxiety attacks.
‘Fishing relaxes me so much. I used to get panic attacks in year 7. And now I’m dead relaxed, it’s weird because I
used to have panic attacks at school, and then one day I just couldn’t breathe, and the next day I was with GHOF
again and I was fine. It happens when I have something on my mind to do, coming to school. Whereas tying a hook,
having something to do where I’m just sitting here, something to relax. It calms me down.’ (Male, 13)
Through an approach that combines the therapeutic aspects of angling with youth intervention work, young people
learn to manage their anxiety, overcome fears of social situations and develop social skills that give them greater
confidence in social interactions.
2.2.3 Angling’s Contribution to Improved Social Well-Being
The quality of people’s social relationships has been found to be one of the most robust predictors of well-being.64 The two
most significant determinants relate to:
•The quality of interpersonal relationships between close family and friends
•A sense of connection, belonging and contribution to a wider community
i) Family
Learning to fish has long been associated with social and family networks, with angling skills, techniques and information
often being passed to young people from parents, grandparents, friends or extended family.65 While the breakdown of family
networks may have disrupted some of this process, our data suggests that young people continue to go fishing predominantly
with family.
61 Scottish Herald. (May 2011) http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/health/fishing-on-the-nhs-for-mental-health-patients-its-a-good-senseof-achievement-when-we-catch-a-fish.13775733
62 Green, H., McGinnity, A., Meltzer, H., et al. (2005) Mental health of children and young people in Great Britain 2004. London: Palgrave.
63 McManus, S, Meltzer, H, Brugha T, Bebbington, P Jenkins, R. (2009) Adult Psychiatric Morbidity in England, 2007: Results of a
household survey, London: The Health and Social Care Information Centre
64 Raben, M, D. (2010) ‘The promotion of well-being: A primer for Policymakers: Working paper 10-25, Economic and Finance Working
Paper Series, London: Brunel University.
65 Wheelock, J., Oughton, E. and Whitman, G. (2009) ‘Well-being and the Values of Angling’, Research poster for the Angling in the Rural
Environment project.
2. Angling and Health and Well-Being
Another example can be found in Scotland, where nursing staff from two NHS mental health hospitals in Greater Glasgow
and Clyde, Leverndale and Dykebar, introduced angling in 2011 to help calm patients and increase their quality of life. The
majority of those engaged are in long term wards and angling offers them one of the few opportunities to change their routine
and get out to experience the natural environment.61
36
In our young angler survey, 76.4% of the sample indicated that a family member fished. However, only 49.7% said they most
often went fishing with family members, and the proportion of respondents was more heavily distributed amongst younger
age groups. Nonetheless, in qualitative interviews with young people and their families, spending quality time with family
members represented a significant part of their enjoyment, particularly when this gave an opportunity for bonding across
gender boundaries.66 As one young girl explained, angling was one of the few activities they could do as a whole family where
everyone could be equally proficient. For adults too, spending quality time with siblings, children and grandchildren, was cited
as an important aspect of angling participation.
‘It’s something me and my brothers tend to do together, we carry on the tradition that our father passed onto us.
Sometimes even though me and my brothers fish together there will be a moments of silence, but generally we have a
good catch up, there’s also that element of competition there.’ (Survey comment made by 39 year old male angler)
ii) Friends and Contributing to the Wider Community
Angling is also an important means of forming connections and meaningful relationships outside of the family unit. As alluded
to in Section 1, angling participation involves a wide variety of affiliated activities that support a rich social world, including
membership of clubs and associations, coaching and mentoring, contributing to websites and taking part in competitions.
Membership of formal social structures such as angling clubs and associations provides opportunities to engage in
democratic processes, take on responsibilities, join social events, engage in coaching or volunteering, and meet new people.
For older adults in particular, formal volunteering has been shown to be a protective factor in psychological well-being by
providing a sense of purpose and productive roles in later life.67 Volunteering opportunities build social capital, and facilitate
feelings of collective belonging, civil engagement and connectedness.68 Because angling promotes opportunities to build
meaningful relationships based on shared interest rather than religious, ethnic, or regional affiliation, it has the potential to
facilitate greater community integration (Section 4).
66 Djohari, N (2010) Young People’s Voices Part1: The Well-being Benefits of Angling Participation, Manchester: Substance. http://www.
resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/sites/resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/files/Young_People_Part1_wellbeing2010.pdf
67 Greenfield, E and Marks, N. (2004) ‘Formal volunteering as a protective factor for older adult’s psychological well-being’, in Journal of
Gerontology, Vol 95b (5) 258-264; see also Dolan, P., Peasgood, T. and White, M.P. (2006) Review of Research on the Influences on
Personal Well-being and Application to Policy Making, London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
68 For a detailed discussion of the benefits offered by club membership, see Putnam, R.D (1995) ‘Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social
Capital’, Journal of Democracy, 6:1, pp.65-78.
37
Angling addresses specific well-being issues for both young and older people.
Sustaining well-being is about encouraging healthy life choices at all stages of life, from early childhood development
through to old age. Angling, being open to participation across the generations, represents an excellent example for
understanding how a single activity, when adapted to different stages of life, can bring health and well-being benefits
throughout the life course.
i) Angling, Children and Young People
Angling helps build young people’s relationships and confidence.
Securing the well-being of children has become a particularly pressing concern for the UK in the wake of ranking last in
UNICEF’s 2007 table on young people’s well-being across 21 of the richest nations69. Among the UNICEF well-being
domains where the UK performed poorly were ‘family and peer relationships’ and ‘subjective well-being’.
Amongst the 188 young people we interviewed and the 219 who completed the Young People’s Angling Survey, angling
emerged as an important contributor to well-being in three distinct ways:
•Building strong supportive social relationships with adults and peers
•Boosting confidence and self-esteem
•Providing respite and escape from stressful situations
‘I do it to get away from anything bad happening, I can just come down here, I can escape from everything and it’s my
space to chill out in, relax and do what you want.’ (Male 15)
These benefits are clearly captured in responses to the Young People’s Angling Survey (see graphic in figure 2) and reveal
the important role angling can play in supporting young people to live happy, healthy lives. For young people who are socially
excluded or do not participate in other sports or recreational activities, the benefits of meeting supportive adults and peers
can be especially significant.70
75.7%
said angling
made them
“feel better
when
stressed or
upset”
8 out of 10
thought angling was
“something they were good at”
64.5%
had met
65.5%
had met people
they could
“share
problems
with and ask
for advice”
“friends they felt close to
“being peaceful, relaxed and less stressed”
was the top motivator for angling participation
Figure 2: Well-being Results From the Young People’s Angling Survey
69 UNICEF (2007) An Over View of Child Well-being in Rich Countries, Report Card 7.
70 More detailed qualitative accounts from young people can be found in the Djohari, N. (2010b) Young People’s Voices Part 1: The Wellbeing Benefits of Angling Participation, Manchester: Substance http://resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/sites/resources.anglingresearch.
org.uk/files/Young_People_Part1_wellbeing2010.pdf
2. Angling and Health and Well-Being
2.2.3 Angling Across the Life Course
38
ii) Angling Benefits for Older People
Angling provides opportunities for ‘active ageing’.
‘When I retired in 2003 aged 67, I found that carrying all the equipment for coarse angling was getting a bit much, and
a couple of years ago I took up fly fishing. I joined a Fly Dressing Group and made new friends. The group organises
fishing trips, we give demonstrations and teach children. In about a month’s time I will be 75. Fishing has given me good
friends, a meaningful existence, and a sense of worth I could easily have missed had I retired to the TV sport and old
folks’ organisations. Life is full and I enjoy every minute.’ (Online comment submitted 16/9/2011).
With an increasingly ageing population, and people expected to work longer before retirement, the Foresight Mental Capital
and Well-being report71 highlights two emerging social challenges:
i) How to maintain mental capital (cognitive capabilities, resilience, social skills) that will help older people maintain their
well-being and independence into old age;
ii) How to make more use of older people’s capabilities and reverse negative stereotypes.
Our research has found that angling is contributing to positive outcomes in both these areas by encouraging active ageing.
‘Active ageing’ refers to people’s continued participation in the social, political and cultural aspects of life. It focuses not only
on maintaining physical and mental health but also on creating an environment through which older people can maintain their
autonomy and independence, and engage in a fulfilling social life. Angling facilitates active ageing in four interconnected ways
which are outlined in Table 5.
Active Ageing Criteria
Angling’s Contribution
Life-long learning: a protective
factor against cognitive decline.72
•Encourages people to continue engaging in learning, through angling skill
development.
•Taking on new roles and responsibilities as coaches or within angling clubs.
Continued physical activity:
Can delay functional decline
and reduce the onset of chronic
disease.73
•Angling participation is not restricted by a person’s level of physical ability.
•Can be effective at keeping older people physically active long after their ability to
participate in other sports and recreation activities have declined.
•Older people can come to angling later in life, unlike many other sports.
Reducing isolation and
increasing social connection:
Can combat increased morbidity
and psychological distress in
older people.74
•Angling offers a rich social world in which to participate and meet new people.
•Participation in angling clubs leads to social networks, volunteering and
competitions.
•Informal interactions on the waterside also offer potential for developing friendships.
Making a meaningful
contribution to society:
Recognises and utilises the
wealth of experience and helps
share it with younger generations.
•Angling is one of the few sports where older people can continue to contribute long
past retirement age.
•Angling involves an intergenerational exchange of knowledge which is beneficial for
young and old alike.
•Across angling clubs and projects working with some of the most challenging
young people, we have found many retired people take up new opportunities as
volunteers and coaches. The ADB report approximately 37% of the 1040 newly
qualified UKCC coaches since 2009 were over 50.
Table 5: Angling’s Contribution to Active Ageing
727374
71 Foresight Mental Capital and Well-being Project (2008) Final Project Report: Executive Summary, London: The Government Office
for Science, p11.
72 ibid
73 World Health Organisation. (2002) Active Ageing: A policy Framework.
74 ibid; Cattan; M , Bond, J; Learmouth, A; White, M. (2005). ‘Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: a systematic
review of health promotion’. In Ageing and Society, Vol. 25, pp. 41-67.
39
2.3.1 Access
One of the greatest strengths of angling is that participation is not restricted by a person’s underlying physical ability.
Nonetheless, those with disabilities and restricted mobility can sometimes find fisheries ill-prepared to meet their needs. In
addition, young people face additional challenges to participation, being restricted to fisheries in urban centres or those they
can access on their own via public transport. More needs to be done to ensure everyone, regardless of age, physical ability
or status, is able to access the benefits provided through angling.
If angling is to develop its delivery of health and well-being outcomes, particularly to those suffering physical or mental health
problems, then there is a need to improve access to fisheries and fishing opportunities. Although much good work has been
delivered in recent years, supported by angling governing bodies and agencies such as the Environment Agency, more
needs to be done. Local authorities should commit to opening or maintaining access to fishing at accessible venues in
centralised locations that are close to public transport routes.75 Fisheries themselves should continue to improve disability
access and facilities.
2.3.2 Connections with Health Providers
Angling as a sector is not particularly well connected with health providers or policymakers, locally, regionally or nationally.
Although we have seen some very good examples of angling as a restorative health activity and some innovative projects,
this is the exception rather than the rule. Angling governing bodies at a national level in the UK, and ADB Regional Managers,
County Angling Action Groups (CAAGs) and angling clubs and projects, need to establish these links if the potential
is to be realised.
As such there is a need to strengthen links between angling and the health sector. Angling organisations should make
links with the health sector at a national, regional and local level. This should involve providing information on the benefits
angling can deliver and building relationships, pilots and joint projects with both national and local agencies in mental and
physical health work. Work being done with MIND and the Stroke Association are good examples of the fruitfulness
of collaborative projects.
•National policymakers and charities should meet angling governing bodies to discuss development of the health and
well-being benefits
•Regional managers should contact regional health forums, open dialogue and develop pilot projects.
•CAAGs and local angling clubs should contact PCTs, local authority public health officials and GP forums to provide
information on activities they can offer.
2.3.3 Evaluation
The benefits of angling for health and well-being are little known outside of the angling sector. In part this is due to an
absence of demonstrable data, with few intervention programmes effectively monitoring and evaluating their outcomes.
In order to successfully communicate with health care professionals, the future GP consortia expected to replace Primary
Care Trusts, and local authorities who will have responsibilities for public health, angling will need to be able to provide robust
evidence that programmes are delivering the intended health and well-being benefits.
There is a need for angling to work with health and research professionals to provide evidence of angling’s contribution to
health and well-being. This can be easily achieved through basic monitoring and evaluation of health and well-being outcomes
across angling programmes. For targeted interventions in particular, lessons can be learnt from horticulture and green exercise
programmes that have gained widespread recognition within health sectors because they have engaged in more robust
evaluations. Commissioning of more in depth specific health research should be explored.
75 See Brown, A et al. (2011) Making the Most of Community Waters: Localism, Health and Angling (2011), for more suggestions on how to
improve community access to angling. http://resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/sites/resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/files/Making_the_
most_of_community_waters.pdf
2. Angling and Health and Well-Being
2.3 Issues and Recommendations
40
3. Angling and the
Natural Environment
In Brief
Angling delivers benefits for the environment and for people accessing natural environments in
two principal ways:
•Delivering environmental benefits through anglers’ engagement in conservation, ecosystem
monitoring and raising environmental awareness.
•Acting as a ‘gateway’ for people to access green spaces and create connections with nature
which improves the wellbeing of people and their communities.
3.1 Introduction and Context
The current and future contribution of angling to accessing, improving and raising awareness of the natural environment means
that it is relevant to several key policy agendas.
• Valuing the ecosystems of the UK has emerged as an important cross-departmental agenda, contributing to both
personal well-being and economic prosperity.76 The environment white paper, The Natural Choice: Securing the value of
nature (2011), makes a commitment to ‘mainstream the value of nature’77 by:
• Supporting local actions that protect and enhance nature
• Creating a green economy
• Strengthening the connections between people and nature
• Showing international leadership on natural environment matters.
• The public health white paper, Healthy People, Healthy Lives78 specifically recognises the health benefits of green
spaces (discussed in the previous section) and sets out Local Authority responsibilities for facilitating greater access to
quality green spaces.
• The UK’s responsibilities to the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) include the protection, improvement and
sustainable use of all water bodies in the environment.
• Greener neighbourhoods can reduce crime and improve quality of life79. However there has been a noted decline in
the condition and accessibility of urban green spaces in the UK, particularly in deprived urban areas.80 Contemporary
initiatives to address this include the Localism Bill, the future Community Right to Reclaim Land, and the new ‘Green Area
Designations’ that will empower people to protect and improve the green spaces that are important to them.81
76 The UK National Ecosystem Assessment sets out in detail the economic and health benefits of the natural environment and its related
services (2011).
77 DEFRA (2011) The Natural Choice: Securing the value of nature, London: DEFRA
78 Department of Health (2010) Healthy Lives, Healthy People: Our strategy for public health in England, London: DoH
79 DEFRA (2011) op cit. See also Louv, R. and Frumkin, H. (2007) ‘The Powerful Link Between Conserving Land and Preserving Health’,
Land Trust Alliance Special Anniversary Report, 2007
80 United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (2011) The UK National Ecosystem Assessment:
Synthesis of the Key Findings, Cambridge
81 DEFRA. (2011) op cit. p49-50
41
3.2 Angling’s Contribution to the Natural Environment
Angling can help reverse downward trends in access to green spaces, contributing to environmental improvement,
developing quality green spaces, as well as providing opportunities for people to connect with nature.
3.2.1 Environmental Improvement Work
Anglers and angling organisations help improve aquatic habitats.
Anglers and angling organisations lead, or are partners in, a wide range of projects that aim to improve the quality of aquatic
and marine habitat. The rehabilitation of existing waterways, monitoring and improving fish and invertebrate populations, and
making structural improvements to waters – such as combating bank erosion in rivers – are common examples of the kind
of work anglers are involved in. In the vast majority of cases these activities are carried out by volunteers, although often in
conjunction with statutory agencies.
There are two principal ways in which angling contributes to the management and conservation of the natural environment:
• Improving Aquatic Habitats
• Monitoring ecosystems and environmental health
i) Improving Aquatic Habitats
Anglers’ involvement in assisting habitat conservation has wider community benefits.
‘Not only do anglers get a sense of personal achievement from carrying out this sort of voluntary work but, as this work is
usually carried out in the local area, this benefits the local community as well.’ (Online comment submitted 23/06/2010)
In our angling participation survey, 593 respondents (approximately 25% of the sample) said that they ‘contributed to
environmental or aquatic habitat conservation projects’.
Many angling clubs and associations encountered during our research - for example Salford Friendly Anglers’ Society and the
Shropshire Anglers’ Federation - regularly take part in conservation work which includes:
• Removal of invasive plants (such as Japanese knotweed)
• Removal of invasive species (such as signal crayfish)
• Planting of riparian vegetation to improve the function and appearance of natural habitats
• Removal of rubbish from rivers.
In another example, as part of the Trout in the Town project, Disley and New Mills Angling Club (DNMAC) members have been
working under the guidance of The Wild Trout Trust and the Environment Agency to improve the health of stretches of the
River Goyt. This has included a number of specific tasks, such as bank stabilisation to prevent erosion and the installation of
large woody debris to create pools, scouring and changes in water flow.
Although much angler-led habitat improvement takes place on rivers, the actions of anglers can also benefit still waters and
regenerate neglected urban green spaces. For example, after purchasing Walker’s Dam, Alverthorpe, in 2006, members of
Wakefield Angling Club have, with technical assistance from the Environment Agency, transformed the water from a neglected
state to a balanced coarse fishery managed by the club.
Similarly, at Charlton’s pond in Billingham and Hemlington Lake in Middlesbrough, improvements to angling waters have
included creating fish refuges, bankside planting and the construction of fishing pegs. The regeneration of these two urban
areas has helped to reduce the incidence of anti-social behaviour and fly tipping, and transformed previously neglected green
spaces into community assets. These areas now attract a broad range of community members interested in various forms of
outdoor recreation, such as bird watching, walking and picnicking – as well as fishing.
3. Angling and the Natural Environment
The data for our research in this area was collected using quantitative and qualitative survey work, through research at a
variety of angling projects and online qualitative submission forms. This included some in-depth work with Trout in the Town,
a project run by the Wild Trout Trust, which helps to improve urban river environments.
42
There is, however, potential for angling to play a much greater role in environmental improvement and regeneration of urban
green spaces:
• The Natural Choice white paper proposes new Green Areas Designations which offers scope for angling organisations
to work with other community groups82.
• The demand from anglers to be involved in such work is evidenced by our angling participation survey: 37% of game anglers
said they had joined, or would consider joining, an angling club to participate in environmental initiatives (26% for coarse
anglers, and 24% sea anglers).
• Work with young people to deliver conservation and ecosystem education is expanding, helping young people to learn
about the wider consequences of pollution and encourage environmental stewardship83. However, concerns about
health and safety need to be overcome to extend provision and young people’s involvement in river clean up and aquatic
conservation practices.
In Focus: Trout in the Town
Trout in the Town (TinTT) is a community-focused initiative of the Wild Trout Trust that is funded by the Esmée
Fairbairn Foundation. TinTT aims to:
‘improve the quality of river habitat in urban areas for the benefit of trout and wider biodiversity, and to raise
awareness of wild trout as a totem species for clean water and living rivers.’
The core principles of the Trout in the Town programme are habitat restoration and a commitment to increasing
awareness of, and education about, urban rivers. Currently TinTT has projects in both England and Scotland, centred
on Huddersfield Greenstreams, Colne Water (East Lancs.), Glazert. Water and the Rivers Wandle, Don, Goyt, Cray,
Erewash, Cole, Wye (Buxton) and Irwell84.
TinTT coordinator Dr Paul Gaskell says anglers and angling clubs make up around 90% of the Wild Trout Trust
membership and are therefore inevitably involved in running TinTT projects. Paul also believes that anglers place a
much greater emphasis on maintaining the health of urban rivers:
‘There might be plenty of people that use an urban river corridor, but it would be just as attractive to them if it…
wasn’t as biologically diverse...Whereas there is a particular value – a particular ecosystem value – that game
anglers, and coarse anglers as well, would [place on the river]. They would notice if it [the river] deteriorated, and
they’d also feel strongly about trying to protect it.’
Our research has identified TinTT as an example of good practice in terms of angling’s contribution to improving
urban aquatic habitats. Anglers who have committed to TinTT projects are involved in activities that deliver wider
community benefit, including volunteering, environmental rehabilitation, monitoring invertebrate and fish populations,
information sharing with community members and young people’s education. For more information see
www.urbantrout.blogspot.com/
ii) Monitoring Ecosystems and Environmental Health
Anglers act as the eyes and ears of the natural environment because they spend so much time in and around aquatic
habitats.
‘Anglers have long been the unpaid ’early warning system’ for any pollution problems. It is they who are on the frontline
and able to report any problems or incidents direct to the EA. Without them, our waterways would be a lot worse off.’
(Angler comment submitted online 16/08/2010)
Anglers spend huge amounts of time either in or alongside bodies of water, developing an intimate knowledge of particular
waterways, still waters and coastal stretches. They are often the first to report incidents of pollution and change in
ecosystems. This role as the ‘eyes and ears’ of aquatic habitats has been recognised by the establishment of telephone
hotlines and other reporting mechanisms specifically for anglers by both the Environment Agency (in England and Wales) and
SEPA (in Scotland). Angler feedback can include reports of signs of fish in distress, poaching or environmental pollutants.
82 DEFRA (2011) op cit.
83 Djohari, N. (2010c) Young People’s Voices Part 3: The Added Value of Angling Intervention Programmes, Manchester: Substance, p15
http://resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/sites/resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/files/young_people_intervention_2010.pdf
84 http://resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/data_visualisation/maps/titt
43
• Gathers knowledge of river conditions
• Provides ’hard’ ecological evidence valued by environmental agencies
• Extends the abilities of people and communities to actively participate in monitoring water quality.
These types of initiatives are not limited to inland waters. The Scottish Sea Angling Conservation Network (SSACN) charity
has introduced a number of conservation initiatives for the benefit of the marine environment. One of these is The Scottish
Shark Tagging Programmes (SSTP), which seeks to gather much needed statistical data on shark, skate and ray populations
that are becoming endangered. SSTP:
• Run fish tagging events, such as the Sharktag weekend on the Solway, where anglers are taught how to safely catch and tag
the relevant species and record data online.
• Have tagged 2390 fish
• Have to date involved 192 anglers.86
Sharktag events also helps to generate media interest and raise awareness about the plight of sharks around the
Scottish coast and encourage good conservation practices among those fishing for them. This is complemented by the
direct educational work SSACN do in schools, encouraging children to attend shark ‘eggcase hunts’ and identify them later
in classrooms.
85 Riverfly Partnership Angler Monitoring Initiative: http://www.riverflies.org/index/riverfly_monit.htm
86 SSACN (2011) Scottish Shark Tagging Programme. Progress Report Dec 2011. http://www.tagsharks.com/reading-room
3. Angling and the Natural Environment
However, anglers also provide an often untapped and ‘unofficial’ resource as repositories of aquatic history. Individual
knowledge about the life of rivers, canals, still waters and coastlines is developed, held and shared over many years –
sometimes decades – of angling experience. More formally, many angling clubs are actively involved in invertebrate and ‘kick’
sampling, as well as monitoring through projects such as the Riverfly Partnership’s Angler Monitoring Initiative85. This work:
44
In Focus: Angling Businesses as Champions of Environmental Monitoring
Angling-related businesses should be showing strong leadership in angling’s commitment to maintaining the health of
the natural environment. One example with good credentials in this area is The Arundell Arms.
The Arundell Arms is a historic fly-fishing hotel in Lifton, Devon that offers guided fishing on 20 miles of the River
Tamar and its tributaries. The hotel has been owned and managed by the same family since 1961, and is commonly
associated with former manager Anne Voss-Bark MBE, whose actions helped establish one of the first rivers trusts in
the UK.
Mrs Voss-Bark managed the hotel between 1961 and 2010, and developed a passion for both angling and the local
river catchment during that time. With the help of poet Ted Hughes and other colleagues, Mrs Voss-Bark began to
investigate the effect of farm fertilisers leaching into soil in vulnerable river catchment areas. This initial work was
formalised into the Tamar 2000 project, and later the Westcountry Rivers Trust (WRT).
The current manager of the Arundell Arms is Mrs Voss-Bark’s son, Adam Fox-Edwards. He sits as a director on the
board of the Westcountry Rivers Trust, and explained to our researcher that his mother and her colleagues were
‘among the first to say there needed to be a more joined-up approach’ to catchment management.
3.2.2 Raising Environmental Awareness
Angling contributes to public knowledge about freshwater and marine environments, both formally and informally.
Improving people’s understanding of the environment, and encouraging their involvement in monitoring and conservation, is
important to protecting green spaces both now and into the future. Angling participation is a gateway to an improved individual
understanding of the natural world, but also helps with the sharing of this knowledge with others, in formal and informal ways.
i) Informal Environmental Education
Our interviews with anglers and angling organisations consistently showed that many anglers had developed extensive
knowledge of the environment and local ecosystems through their angling participation. Our survey of young anglers (n=219)
found that 84.4% said that fishing had taught them more about caring for the environment.
As a part of everyday angling practice and discourse, anglers frequently share information about the quality of aquatic
environments, the life and behaviour of fish, encouraging sustainable practices and the effect of environmental change on
habitats and fish populations. This happens as a matter of course in clubs, on bank sides, in internet forums and pubs.
Because angling is about catching fish, as a practice it relies upon a knowledge of local aquatic habitats – even in the most
man-made, stocked urban settings. This marks it out from most mainstream sport and leisure pursuits (although bird watching,
flora and fauna monitoring, field sports etc. have some similarities). As such, angling provides a hugely valuable informal means
of circulating environmental knowledge that can generate improved environmental awareness and more sustainable practices.
In turn, environmental awareness can motivate anglers to participate in planned environmental work and become involved in
environmental education. As one angling coach explained about his reasons for teaching young people:
‘We are the eyes and ears of preservation; we are out there all of the time sitting by the side of the lakes and rivers. We
are seeing things going wrong and reporting them. There’s no substitute to being there. When we are gone, us older
guys, there has to be someone to take our place or all the passion that we provide for the environment will have dried
up.’ (Interview comment from angling coach and educator).
However, not all anglers behave in an environmentally responsible way, and often this is due to a lack of awareness. Problems
can include littering, not returning undersized fish, poor fish handling technique, and neglect of by-laws. It is important
therefore for anglers to be fully educated on their responsibilities.
• In Scotland, the Club Angling Candidate Pack developed by ADBoS for all new anglers, has been designed so that
learning around environmental safety and fish biology is given precedence over learning about tackle and angling equipment.
This includes the promotion of ‘catch and release’ in wild fisheries as part of sustainable fishing practices.
• The SSACN are promoting responsible fishing through their ‘Give Fish a Chance’ initiative, educating anglers on minimum
landing sizes and providing information on good fish handling practices to improve survival rates and breeding.
45
‘Now I know how to fish properly. When you understand fishing, you start to look at the welfare side of it; you want to
look after the fish, because if there’s no fish there’s no fishing.’ (Interview comment made by Male 18 years old, GHOF)
At Billingham Angling Club young people are encouraged to attend an initiation coaching course in order to get a reduced
rate for club membership (from £10 to £5 for 12-16 year olds and free for under-12’s). The induction focuses on teaching fish
welfare practices, environmental awareness and basic health and safety, encouraging sustainable angler practices from the
very beginning. We have recorded this sharing of environmental knowledge elsewhere as well:
‘The good thing about the fishing is getting the kids to sit down for a couple of hours and you can really engage with them and
you can talk about the environment and looking after the area, not littering. So it gives us a tool to work with them.’ (Interview
comment made by Recreation Manager at Hemlington Lake).
ii) Formal Environmental Education
Angling-related organisations also help deliver more formal environmental education, often incorporating opportunities for
student learning outside the classroom.
Both the National Curriculum in England and Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence87 incorporate an emphasis on the
importance and benefits of learning outdoors. Learning outside the classroom has the potential to develop young people as
active citizens and stewards of the environment88. Research suggests that an emotional affinity with nature and a desire
to protect it can be established in positive childhood experiences in the natural environment89.
The value of outdoor education, however, is not just in raising environmental awareness. Research shows that outdoor
education programmes have the potential to improve educational outcomes, encouraging experiential learning (which helps
students to build bridges between theory and reality), improve attitudes to learning, and decrease the risk of permanent
exclusion90.
Bringing learning outside – thereby providing access to the natural environment – also has the potential to remedy what
Richard Louv described as the ‘nature-deficit disorder’ afflicting young people in contemporary society.91 The importance of
outdoor learning for child development and education is also recognised in The Natural Choice White Paper, with an explicit
commitment made to support schools teaching outdoors by reducing unnecessary rules and barriers.
Within angling, we have found angling-related groups currently make a significant contribution to environmental education in
primary and secondary schools through programmes such as:
• Trout in the Classroom: Initially delivered by the Wandle Trust in south London in 2001, but now delivered throughout the
UK in partnership with numerous organisations.
• Mayfly in the Classroom: Delivered as part of the Trout in the Town programme.
• Salmon in the Classroom: Delivered in Scotland since 1991 by Galloway Fisheries Trust, now adopted by multiple
delivery partners across schools in Scotland.
• The Salmon Homecoming project delivered by the Wye and Usk Foundation
• The Brown Trout Book: A primary school educational publication delivered in Scotland through the Salmon and Trout
Association, including versions in Gaelic.
• Stickleback in the Classroom: Led by the EA and Leicester University in Leeds, and by Thames 21 in North London.
• Beachcombing: Educational activities regularly run by GHOF Easington in the North East of England.
• Fly-tying and Entomology: Taught variously through fly tying and fly fishing associations as well as GHOF Shropshire.
87 The Scottish Government Curriculum for Excellence: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Education/Schools/curriculum/ACE
88 See Council for Learning outside the Classroom. http://www.lotc.org.uk/
89 Kals, E, Schumacher, D and Montada, L (1999) ‘Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature’ Environment
and Behaviour, Vol. 31, No. 2; and Ballantyne, R, Packer, J (2002) ‘Nature-based Excursions: School Students’ Perceptions of Learning in
Natural Environments.’ International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 11 (3), pp. 218-236.
90 Fox, P and Avramidis, E. (2003) ‘An evaluation of an outdoor education programme for students with emotional and behavioural difficulties’,
in Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties 8 (4) 267–283; also see LOtC (2009) Learning Outside the Classroom Manifesto.
91 Louv, R (2005) Last Child in the Woods, Carolina: Algonquin Books.
3. Angling and the Natural Environment
Work with young people is particularly important for encouraging sustainable fishing practices. All the young people’s
angling projects we researched included education about fish anatomy and the role of fish within wider ecosystems in
order to help young people understand the science behind fish welfare handling practices. Angling-based youth intervention
projects, as discussed in Section 6, also use environmental learning to encourage young people to develop a sense of social
responsibility and ownership of their local environment.
46
In Focus: The Eel Project , Assynt
As part of our research in Assynt, Sutherland, we observed the delivery of the Eel Project. This was a partnership
project by the Culag Community Woodland Trust, the Highland Council Ranger Service and the West Sutherland
Fisheries Trust (WSFT).
The project was one of a series of indoor and outdoor classroom sessions with local schoolchildren to educate them
about the life cycle of the eel. It covered a whole range of issues from factors affecting eel population and local loch
water quality, to invertebrate life and other fish populations. Whilst trout and salmon dominate in north west Scotland,
educating local young people about the eel, whose numbers have been dropping all over the UK, helped to broaden
young people’s understanding of their local ecosystems.
One session we observed in May 2010 was delivered outside, in the rain, at two lochs on the Little Assynt Estate
which is owned by the CCWT (www.culagwoods.org.uk). With primary school children from Stoer, Lochinver and
Achiltibuie attending, it involved:
• Kick sampling with identification of invertebrate
• Electro fishing small burns
• Testing water quality and acidity
• Eel trapping
Electro fishing, inspecting eel traps and outdoor education with children from Assynt schools.
3.2.3 Connecting People with Nature
Angling is a gateway activity for people to make connections with nature.
‘I’ve had some amazing moments, I’ve seen a heron dive in and catch fish only metres away from me, seen huge carp
warming themselves in shallow water. Angling gets me outside, alone, and has given me the opportunity to experience
an evening beside a lake in summer, to watch the sun set and feel like the day could not have been better spent.’
(Online comment submitted by 15 year old male).
Increasing people’s access to nature is a core component of government policies for the environment, community and health
in both England and Scotland. Accessing green spaces is important for people because it has been found to generate:
• Increased levels of physical activity
• Improved health, particularly mental well-being92
• Improved environmental awareness and protection
• Wider community involvement and cohesion, (e.g. conservation volunteering)
92 Glasgow Centre for Population Health (2007) Briefing Paper 2: Health and the Physical Characteristics of Urban Neighbourhoods: A
Critical Literature Review, Glasgow: GCPH
47
• Angling allows people to access nature as part of the activity. In our angling participation survey, 93% of anglers claimed
that angling participation was either an ‘important’, ‘very important’ or ‘extremely important’ way for them to experience nature.
During angler interviews, connecting with nature was a recurring theme:
‘I like being close to nature. If you fish on your own with no disturbance you see a lot of animals/birds behaving naturally,
which you don’t see if there are a lot of people, noise, dogs or boats around.’ (Interview comment made by 52 year-old
male)
‘When fishing I am consumed by the experience, to the extent that I do not think of anything else for the hours I am at
the river/lake/sea. I am immersed in the experience and the natural world, relaxed and stress-free.’ (Survey comment
made by 56 year-old male)
• Angling can facilitate connection with nature, even in highly urbanised settings. This was highlighted in one research
visit to an urban pond in Leegommery, Telford and Wrekin, situated in a large housing estate. Despite not being a ‘green’
environment, local residents appreciated being by the water because it provided an opportunity to observe small changes in
pond life, local nesting birds and other wildlife.
• Angling provides these opportunities for a vast cross-section of the population because it is accessible both across the
life course and levels of ability, increasing access to nature for those who may have limited opportunities for outdoor
recreation otherwise.
• Angling can also be a route to participation in conservation volunteering, something DEFRA in particular is keen to
encourage through support of programmes such as Muck In4Life.93 Environmental organisations increasingly recognise that
people are an integral part of ecosystems with an essential role to play in solutions to environmental problems.94 However,
conservation volunteering also benefits both local communities (through sense of ownership, improved access and active
citizenship95) and individual participants (through improved health and wellbeing, reduced isolation and improved mood96).
Many anglers see their participation in conservation activities as having a positive impact on improving the quality of life in their
local community.
‘Stewardship of the environment is [also] stewardship of the community to some extent. The clubs with whom I have
membership maintain their local environments and promote access to them from the local communities. In this way the
environment is seen as a shared resource, which anglers, by dint of their special interest, make an effort to preserve and
share”. (Online comment submitted 10/6/10)
‘River and bank restoration combined with predator control on our river in the Derbyshire Dales has improved the
ecosystem for many birds and animals, especially water voles that live in and near the river. I get great pleasure from
positively improving the environment and from the excitement members of the public show when they see the voles,
dippers and kingfishers.’ (Online comment submitted 25/8/2011)
Anglers’ contact with nature as part of their sporting practice can also potentially lead to much wider community involvement.
One example of this we have researched in-depth is The Wandle Trust, where the experience of anglers in the river ultimately
led to the development of a community wide, volunteer based organisation delivering environmental improvement.
93 DEFRA (2011) op cit. p54
94 Ockenden, R. 2007. Volunteering in the natural outdoors in the UK and Ireland. A literature review, Institute for Volunteering Research, p10
95 Ibid: p19-20.
96 Greenfield, E and Marks, N. (2004) ‘Formal volunteering as a protective factor for older adults’ psychological well-being’, in Journal of
Gerontology. Vol 95b (5). 258-264; see also Dolan, P., Peasgood, T. and White, M.P.
3. Angling and the Natural Environment
Angling contributes to these outcomes in a number of ways.
48
In Focus - The Wandle Trust
The River Wandle flows through four boroughs in southwest London to join the River Thames at Wandsworth. In the
17th and 18th centuries the River Wandle was heavily industrialised and subjected to various forms of pollution and
modification97. By the 1990s, the continuing poor state of the river provoked a group of anglers to organise informal
river clean-up events. This eventually gave way to the establishment of the Wandle Trust in 2000 − an environmental
charity dedicated to restoring the health of the river and its surrounding areas.
The Trust now coordinates regular events to remove invasive plant species and improve existing, aquatic habitats. It
runs litter removal events every month, rotated along different stretches of the river to include all boroughs. Over the
last decade the Trust has also been working with local schools, delivering their ‘Trout in the Classroom’ education
initiative which sets up in-class aquariums to rear the fry of brown trout before they are eventually released into the
River.
The Trust has changed considerably over the years in terms of the size and composition of its volunteers and
supporters. Current river clean-up events typically attract between 40-50 volunteers, and according to The Trust
many of the volunteers are either non-anglers or have little knowledge of angling occurring on the river. Our interviews
with non-angler volunteers at a clean-up event illustrate volunteering for The Trust is helping individuals to initiate a
relationship with the river, to revisit childhood experiences, or to simply feel they are contributing to a better place to
live and work .
‘Well, I grew up on the Wandle. It has given something to me. It sounds corny, but it is about giving something back
to the river from what it gave me as a kid – all the fun I got out of playing in it as a kid.’ (Interview comment made by
41 year-old male volunteer)
‘It is nice to do something beneficial for the environment. It’s social, it’s fun. You get to feel smug at the end of the day
because you’ve done something good! I do a bit of conservation work – I live at Wandsworth – and it’s really nice to
be able to just walk here rather than having to travel.’ (Interview comment made by 40 year-old female volunteer)
Anglers are still a part of the volunteer work-force at clean-up events, and the Wandle Piscators, an angling club
founded in close alliance to The Trust in 2004, are committed to the conservation and restoration of the River Wandle
by virtue of their club constitution. To date, The Trust appears to have balanced the interests of angling, the natural
environment and the community very successfully. On 30th August 2011, the EA announced the River Wandle
as one of UK’s ten most improved rivers, citing a ‘huge local enthusiasm for the river which has resulted in a vast
improvement of water quality’ whilst noting that ‘the Wandle is now well known as one of the best urban coarse
fisheries in the country.’ (Environment Agency 2011).
97 Wandle Industrial Museum 2011, see http://www.wandle.org, accessed 3rd December 2011.
49
3.3.1 New Institutional Relationships
New institutional relationships at a national level offer the opportunity to further develop angling’s contribution to the natural
environment.
In England, the combination of a number of factors, including the changing role of the EA98, government spending cuts and
the ‘Big Society’ agenda, means that the EA, angling and fishery organisations are in a process of renegotiating the terms of
their relationships. The potential for such new relationships is enhanced by:
• The growth of the Association of Rivers Trusts from one trust in 1994 to 27 trusts in 2011, which has been supported
by EA investment over a number of years. Rivers Trusts provide a well-resourced national network of local expertise for
managing the health of rivers
• The creation of the Angling Trust and its forthcoming merger with the Angling Development Board in 2012,
representing over 1,500 clubs, 400,000 anglers and a regional network of County Angling Action Groups
• Ongoing development of existing partnerships between the AT and Association of Rivers Trusts, Riverfly Partnership,
Barbel Society, Wild Trout Trust and Get Hooked on Fishing.
• Recent examples of good partnership practice, including the Our Rivers campaigns in 2009 and 2010 (AT, Salmon and
Trout Association, the World Wildlife Fund and the Royal Society for Protection of Birds); and development of best practice
guides for anglers and fishery owners, which have been developed by the EA in conjunction with the Angling Trades
Association, Angling Trust and National Swan Convention.
In the marine environment, the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 led to creation of 10 Inshore Fisheries and
Conservation Authorities (IFCAs). These offer a new opportunity for recreational fishing representatives to work with
government agencies, local authorities, environmental groups, commercial fishing interests and marine research organisations
to promote ‘the sustainable management of inshore fisheries resources in their local area’.99 If run in an open and cooperative
way, IFCAs could be the basis of increased involvement of recreational sea anglers in marine environment improvement and
conservation.
In Scotland, the 42 District Salmon Fishery Boards (DFSBs), the Rivers and Fisheries Trusts of Scotland (RAFTS) and
ADBoS could work closer together on promoting sustainable fisheries and improved aquatic habitats. This could also be
furthered through SANA (Scottish Anglers National Association) and SFCA’s (Scottish Federation for Coarse Angling)
membership of the Freshwater Fisheries Forum, a stakeholder group that provides advice to the Scottish Government on all
aspects of freshwater fisheries management.100
Marine Scotland are already a co-funder of the work of ADBoS and the angling governing bodies. Their priorities around
sea fisheries include the sustainable management of Scottish sea fisheries, support for sea fisheries-dependent communities,
and ensuring the use of Scottish marine space balances the interests of fisheries with those of other marine users101. These
priorities should be the basis for developing the existing work done by recreational sea anglers, as exemplified by the SSACN
and others.
98 Environment Agency (2011) Corporate Plan 2011-15. Environment Agency, Bristol.
99 Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authorities (IFCAs) http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/marine/wwo/ifca/, accessed 1st December
2011.
100 See http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/marine/Salmon-Trout-Coarse/Forum for more information. The Freshwater Fisheries Forum was
responsible for the publication of the Strategic Framework for Scottish Freshwater Fisheries in 2008, the key strategy document for
future management of freshwater fisheries in Scotland.
101 Marine Scotland (2010) Strategic Plan 2010-2013, Edinburgh: MS. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/04/16154510/1
accessed 8th January 2012
3. Angling and the Natural Environment
3.3 Issues and Recommendations
50
3.3.2 Angling and Environmentalism
There is a clear vested interest for anglers and the angling sector to become involved in the conservation, preservation or
rehabilitation of aquatic habitats. In our research, this was referred to by some anglers as an ‘environmental ethic’ in angling:
‘To spend time in a beautiful environment, doing what we enjoy, is a privilege not a right. All outdoor environments are
under increased pressure, not least from the recreational lobby. If we want to retain our ability to enjoy these things we
need to show the rest of the world that we are responsible and care about all aspects of what we do.’
(Survey comment by 58 year-old male game angler)
However, some anglers’ behaviour can have a detrimental impact on the environment. Littering has been noted in other angling
research102 as well as ours (21 comments in our angling participation survey), although the dominant discourse has been
about ways of minimising this sort of negative impact.
The desire for environmental protection on the part of some fishery scientists can imply that the best way to protect fish stocks
is to not fish for them. Such a position tends to view humans as separate from nature rather than part of it; and it also tends
to ignore or diminish the importance of human (or in this case angler) engagement with nature as a vital way of observing,
understanding, valuing and, ultimately conserving nature.
Moreover, on occasions where anglers have been involved in habitat improvement work, critics have pointed out that such
efforts are merely constructing a particular version of the natural habitat that is good for fish and fishing.103 This point was also
made in the Angling in the Rural Environment (AIRE) project on river rehabilitation work for pearl mussels104. The AIRE project
researchers posed the question: ‘does angling enhance green spaces and therefore encourage health and well-being benefits
for communities; or does it force a particular version of green space to be protected/created/enhanced to benefit angling’?
The answer may be both, but as long as natural environments are developed as resources which need to be sustainably
managed – rather than wildernesses in which no human treads – then angling is well-placed to make a positive contribution.
3.3.3 Recommendations
i) New institutional responsibilities and relationships at a national and regional level in the UK offer an opportunity to create
new partnerships between angling organisations, environmental agencies and charities. This should involve organisations
like the Angling Trust and the Rivers Trusts taking on new roles within the context of devolved statutory responsibilities that
could include coordinated environmental improvement work; fishery management; responsible angling practice; and angling
regulation (such as policing rod licences).
ii) Angling national governing bodies in both England and Scotland should promote the work of angling in environmental
improvement, monitoring, access and awareness through: publicity, maintaining a public database of clubs and projects
working in this area and representation and advocacy of this work at a national level.
iii) National angling organisations and their regional divisions should help coordinate the development of partnerships between
angling clubs and young people’s projects and local environmental organisations (Rivers Trusts, Wildlife Trusts etc.). Public
agencies with responsibility for environmental improvement and stewardship should seek to fund such partnerships.
iv) There is a particular opportunity for the development of environmental improvement, monitoring and education work with
young people. The expanding number of young people’s angling projects outlined in Section 6 suggests that partnerships
between organisations such as Trout in the Town and Get Hooked on Fishing could be mutually beneficial. National bodies
should develop advice and guidance to clubs and associations on the range of activities young people can safely be
encouraged to participate in.
v) At both a national and a regional level there is a need for new strategic partnerships, increased cooperation and
transparency and a new openness between marine agencies and sea anglers and their organisations.
102 Angling in the Rural Environment was a study undertaken by Newcastle and Durham Universities and funded by the Rural Economy and
Land Use Programme, funded by UK research councils: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/cre/aire/pics/webpageOutline.pdf
103 Washabaugh, W., with Washabaugh, C. (2001) Deep Trout: Angling and popular culture, Cambrid ge: Berg
104 Bracken, L. (2009) Knowledge and Evidence in Angling in the Rural Environment, paper presented to Angling in the Rural Environment
Dissemination Conference, York, May 27th 2009.
51
In Brief
This section describes the positive role that angling and anglers can play in local communities in
relation to:
•Empowering people to be active citizens through the development of new or renovated
community facilities
•Creating opportunities for greater cohesion and integration within communities
4.1 Introduction and Context
Much of the focus of national and local policy over the last decade has been concerned with ways of improving the lives of
people within their local area. This has included drives to develop community cohesion, initiatives to give communities the right
to buy land (such as the Scottish Land Reform Act 2004) and new legislation to give communities a greater role in owning
and running facilities and services (epitomised by the Localism Bill in England).
More recently, the ‘big society’ agenda has come to represent this policy focus and has also been used to formalise efforts
around the promotion of volunteering, the introduction of a changing role for key non-governmental agencies, and a desire to
increase the role of ‘third sector’ organisations (co-operatives, charities and social enterprises).
Our research has found a number of ways in which angling is contributing to this agenda. There are opportunities for angling
to extend the community benefit from activities like volunteering, for angling organisations to take on new roles, as well as
for new partnerships between local authorities, angling and the Third Sector. In 2011, an Interim Report from our research,
Making the Most of Community Waters: Localism, Health and Angling105, set out some of the more detailed evidence about
how angling can contribute to local agendas.
105 Brown, A., Djohari, N. and Stolk, P. (2011) Making the Most of Community Waters: Localism, Health and Angling, Manchester:
Substance. http://resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/sites/resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/files/Making_the_most_of_community_
waters.pdf
4. Angling and Local Community Development
4. Angling and Local
Community Development
52
In Focus: The Localism Agenda
The emergence of the ‘localism’ policy agenda in 2010 and new priorities in public health provide possibilities for
local angling clubs, associations, groups and projects to play a wider, positive role in local communities. This policy
initiative is part of a wider drive to:
•Encourage decentralisation
•Create greater local involvement in the delivery of ‘public services’
•‘Empower communities’ to improve and increase the roles of social enterprises, co-operatives and ‘civil society
organisations’
•Encourage civil society organisations to increase ‘citizen involvement’, especially volunteering, and owning and
running community assets.
In England, the Localism Bill includes provisions to encourage communities to take over failing facilities that are
otherwise likely to close, or land and buildings that are already unused or derelict and which could be put to better
use by the community in which they are based.106
The Bill will also enable community interest groups (CIGs) to nominate land or buildings to be registered by the local
authority as ‘Assets of Community Value’ (ACV) and potentially bid for them.
These new provisions open a way for properly constituted community groups to own and manage local community
assets. This has the potential to include local waters currently owned by local authorities or privately. Given that many
Local Authorities already lease the rights to fish on local waters to local angling organisations, there may be new
opportunities for angling and community organisations to play a greater role, in partnership with Local Authorities, in
running or even owning local assets107.
4.2 The Contribution of Angling to Community Development
Angling can be a means to empower people to become active citizens and bring people from different backgrounds
together.
Angling contributes to community development in two broad ways:
i) As a means to empower people to become active citizens who are involved in improving their local areas – developing,
owning and managing facilities for community use, and working with local authorities.
ii) As a means to bring local people together and increase their participation in community life through the creation of
opportunities for community interaction and participation.
In doing this, angling organisations and individuals can play an important role in changing spaces into places; increasing
access to, changing perceptions of, and encouraging stewardship for local resources. The adoption of new organisational
structures may be needed to maximise these opportunities.
4.2.1 Empowering Communities through Community Assets
In its broadest sense ‘community assets’ can be understood as those factors, resources and environments that people feel are
valuable to maintaining their quality of life. They may be used in daily life to:
•Develop personal capabilities - such as use of leisure or cultural venues
•Build social capital – for example through club membership or volunteering
•Improve and maintain physical and mental health – through use of parks
•Facilitate access to other resources – e.g. through educational resources.
Many ponds, canals, stretches of river, lakes and reservoirs can be considered community assets. However, if they are to be of
maximum benefit to communities, they need to be adequately maintained and accessible to a diverse range of users.
106 House of Commons Library, ‘Localism Bill: Local government and community empowerment’ [Bill No. 126 of 2010-11] Research Paper
11/02, p48, available at: http://www.parliament.uk/briefingpapers/commons/lib/research/rp2011/RP11-002.pdf
107 For more detail on how local authorities can work with angling organisations, see Brown et al (2011) op cit.
53
Angling organisations have been instrumental in developing new facilities.
In the Breaking Barriers report on community cohesion (2010), it was noted that:
‘…poor urban architecture and decaying physical environments can exacerbate community conflict and create a lack
of cohesion. Access to venues can provide an ‘escape’ from this environment and provide a neutral space for new
interactions and bring people together from different areas, ethnicities and backgrounds.’108
Angling has played a particularly important role in relation to the construction of new ponds and new community facilities,
often in conjunction with local authorities. In many instances this role has helped ‘reclaim’ former industrial landscapes, and
contributed to urban regeneration. One example of this sort of contribution is CAST in Nottingham.109 Founded in 2001,
CAST is part of the Future Newstead community group that secured £433,140 of funding from the Big Lottery Fund’s Village
SOS project in order to transform 220 acres of land at the former colliery spoil heaps. The new development will see a
sustainable, eco-sensitive Country Park established at the site as well as the construction of a visitor centre with classrooms,
workshop facilities and angling lakes run by CAST.
CAST has successfully been using angling to engage disaffected young people: improving outcomes in education and
encouraging young people to become actively involved in community improvement work. The Newstead site development is
an extension of this work and has engaged young people and the local community in the creation of fishing platforms, planting,
hedge maintenance and care of the lakes.
Anglers are often explicitly involved in the regeneration of sites for the wider benefit of their local communities, not just for
anglers. In 2008, the Staffordshire Youth Anglers (SYA)110 began the conversion of a former railway embankment site at
Carney Pools Fishery into a wildlife asset for use by local young people, schools and families. They were actively involved in
the funding, planning and development of a wildlife pool, including the creation of disability friendly pathways, parking spaces,
a pond-dipping platform and extensive replanting. The site, now known as Railway Meadows Wildlife Ponds, incorporates
natural seating areas, a sensory garden, and the creation of another wildlife pond, making it a much-valued community asset,
involving young people and the wider community in conservation, work parties and encouraging use by local schools.
ii) Improving Existing Local Assets
Angling organisations can also play an important role in improving local assets, most notably through habitat
improvement works.
More common than creation of new assets, is the involvement of angling organisations and individual anglers in the
improvement of water-based community assets. This contribution is particularly important for communities that lack adequate
resources for site maintenance and/or where these sites are not prioritised for regeneration.
As already discussed in Section 3 of this report, anglers are involved in a diverse range of environmental improvement and
maintenance work. In our survey of more than 2,400 anglers, 24.7% said they participated in environmental conservation
work.111 At local ponds and reservoirs, through to stretches of river, we have found angling to be a motivator for environmental
improvement work that focuses on increasing public access and aesthetics, as well as increasing biodiversity and the quality
of natural habitat.
One example of this is Hemlington Lake in Middlesbrough, located in the heart of a housing estate. The quality of the
resource went into a steep decline around the turn of the century with fly-tipping and anti-social behaviour commonplace. The
‘Friends of Hemlington Lake’ (FHL) group formed by local residents worked with the local authority to create all-abilities paths
around the lake, education boards, pond dipping kits for local schools/families to use, and sculptures by local artists.
108 Crabbe, T and Brown, A (2010) Breaking Barriers: Community cohesion, sport, and organisational development, London: Active
Communities Network, p59.
109 For more details of our research visits see: http://www.resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/project_research_sites/site/7
110 http://www.resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/project_research_sites/site/8
111 Stolk, P. (2009) Angling Participation. Interim Report, Manchester: Substance http://resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/sites/resources.
anglingresearch.org.uk/files/Research_Task_1_Angling_Participation.pdf
4. Angling and Local Community Development
i) Developing New Community Facilities
54
Central to this rejuvenation was the improvement of angling at the site, including disabled and junior angling provision which
has helped reduce vandalism and provide a constructive activity for young people. Courses run by Get Hooked on Fishing
Teesside help young people ‘get to know’ the local community, build relationships with FHL, instil environmental respect and
provide young people with a fishing kit and a pass for free use of waters until they are 16 years old.
Developments are sensitive to wildlife and the environment and balance the needs of residents, anglers, model boaters and
canoeists with the needs of wildlife. As one member of the Friends of Hemlington Lake remarked:
‘Now you walk around [the lake] and residents say hello. You might find a carrier bag blowing around and it’s picked up
by people walking along. It’s because people have seen the improvements and they’re taking more pride in the lake itself
and the area.’ (Interview, 2010)
iii) Owning, Maintaining and Running Facilities
Angling organisations can help to initiate new forms of ownership and undertake maintenance of local assets.
Once facilities have been created they also need running and maintaining in order to be sustainable. The responsibility to
maintain local assets can help broaden community involvement through both formal and informal ‘ownership’ of assets and
involve the development of new ‘third sector’ angling organisations. This is particularly important in relation to both localism
and ‘big society’ agendas where co-operatives, charities and social enterprises are seen as key delivery agencies for greater
community management of local areas.
One example is the newly established social enterprise Get Hooked Ealing. In 2007, Northala Fields was developed into a
country park with lakes using rubble from the demolition of Wembley Stadium. Following consultation with Get Hooked On
Fishing and the Metropolitan Police, the local authority decided greater community benefit could be delivered through the
development of a self-sustaining angling youth intervention project at the site.
In 2010, Get Hooked Ealing was established on-site. Following a business model approach designed by GHOF North East in
Durham, the project seeks to be a self-sustaining social enterprise within three years. Project development has included:
•An environmentally sensitive visitors centre, which houses a café, toilet facilities, tackle shop, classroom and management
office for GHOF
•The lease of the waters and management of the building to GHOF Ealing for 3 years, enabling the project to generate its
own revenue
•Third party lease of the café securing maintenance costs for the entire building.
The establishment of a social enterprise in the GHOF model maximises the benefits of the local water by providing a thriving
local fishery, resident junior angling club, and targeted youth intervention work involving angling and business management.
iv) Local Authority Partnerships
Much of the good practice identified by this research has involved partnerships between angling organisations and
local authorities.
There are few local authorities in the UK that do not have access to rivers, waterways, or coastlines. Our interim report, Making
the Most of Community Waters112 highlighted how local authorities and angling organisations can work together to develop
and improve community assets, and by doing so address local authority priorities such as:
•Urban regeneration and improvement to the physical environment
•Public health and well-being by creating access to green spaces113
•Civic involvement and community safety
There is significant mutual benefit that can be generated in co-operative work on community assets. We have identified three
key approaches to successful joint working:
112 Brown et al (2011) Op cit
113 J. Pretty, J. Peacock, R.Hine, M. Sellens, N. South, M.Griffin. (2007) ‘Green exercise in the UK countryside: Effects on health and
psychological well-being, and implications for policy and planning’, in Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. Volume 50
(2). p 211-231; Richard Louv (2005) Last Child in the Woods: saving our children from Nature Deficit Disorder, Algonquin, Chapel
Hill N.C. Mind (2007) Ecotherapy: The green agenda for mental health. http://www.mind.org.uk/campaigns_and_issues/report_and_
resources/835_ecotherapy
55
In Focus: The Importance of Partnership - Hillingdon
The London Borough of Hillingdon stands out as an example of good practice in how Local Authorities can take
the lead in encouraging more active use of community waters. Many of Hillingdon’s waters had become neglected,
prone to incidents of anti-social behaviour and were inaccessible to young anglers. It undertook a number of
initiatives:
i) Development of a free and accessible family fishery
Transformation of the Little Britain Lake with volunteer help into a free, attractive community site. Improvements
included clearing paths, creating disabled-friendly fishing pegs, re-planting of a picnic area, and installation of street
lighting on the access road.
ii) Conditional leasing to encourage junior angling
Clubs renting council waters are now required to have a junior section as part of the renewal condition of their lease
and are given free CRB checks and other advice/guidance.
iii) Provision of free family fishing events
The council launched a free Family Fishing Fun Day, which in 2010 attracted 1040 participants of all age and
abilities.
iv) Encouraging wide use of angling facilities
Working with the support of Les Webber’s Angling Projects, the council runs a scheme to assist local Scout groups
achieve their angling badges. This involves classroom and bank side sessions, minibus provision and presentations
by the Mayor. The council is also working with schools to run vocational courses on site maintenance, construction of
new waters, fencing, path maintenance, and horticulture, as part of student training.
Hillingdon is successful because the council acts as the
hub for a network of current and potential anglers,
introducing those who would like to take up angling
o those who can provide it. Lyn Summers, angling
development coordinator, says:
‘It’s not as hard as people think, it’s about getting stuck
in and giving it a go and you’ll find that people start to
join in. People will start approaching you, like the Scouts,
the local teachers. But it wouldn’t be possible without
the effort and commitment of people like Les Webber
and the volunteers - we’d never find the volunteers
we need within the council alone. So it’s about building
that base of volunteers.’
4. Angling and Local Community Development
i) Local authority leadership: Agreeing conditional leases for waters; providing free CRB checks; and investing
in community ponds or piers.
ii) Development by a community group: Involving local community groups in maintenance and development of local
waters to access funds and assist communities to respond directly to their own needs.
iii) Establishment of a mutual, charity or social enterprise: To help realise the full potential of local waters by
developing co-operatives, social enterprises or charities to benefit local communities and embrace a range of interests.
56
v) Providing Local Services
Angling organisations can deliver local services that help local authorities and agencies meet their community
obligations.
Given reductions in local authority spending and moves to ‘farm out’ services to the third sector, angling organisations may
be able to assist local authorities to deliver aspects of leisure, education, health and young people’s services. As we discuss
in Section 6 of this report, angling-based youth intervention projects are often incorporated into the delivery of alternative
education provisions for young people.
Get Hooked On Fishing Liverpool have had a long standing relationship with both Stanley Park and Birkenhead Park,
providing regular angling coaching events throughout the summer holidays. In Hastings, the Fishing4u project has been
contracted as a provider of angling for the local council-run Active Hastings healthy lifestyle scheme.114
There is, however, greater scope for angling organisations to be involved in wider service provisions, particularly in relation to
public health. In much the same way as local Wildlife Trusts offer conservation volunteering opportunities, many of the local
angling clubs and river charities that hold regular conservation work parties and river cleans could be incorporated into wider
‘green exercise’ provisions.
4.2.2 Creating Integrated and Cohesive Communities
The way facilities are designed and used is vital to their role in creating integrated and cohesive communities.
The full value of angling organisations developing and running local assets can only be realised if the assets are utilised for
wider community benefit. It is the use of, and access to ‘spaces’ that constitute the means by which locations are
transformed into ‘places’ and subsequently attain special value and meaning within local communities.
Our research has shown that angling sites become recognised community assets when people are involved in the
maintenance of the site and a spectrum of community members (including non-anglers) are able to access the site for
diverse activities. Previous research by Substance has identified that the manner in which facilities are run is very important in
determining their cohesive potential. The work suggested facilities needed to be:
•Accessible – affordable, available and ‘open’ in the broadest sense of the word
•Comfortable – a place in which people can feel at ease
•Neutral – not perceived as being provided for a particular constituency
•Within reach – locally situated or via good transport links
•Positive in their contribution – minimizing negative impacts to local residents
•Connected – working with local agencies and organisations to engage people
•Professional – ensuring delivery is of high quality.115
i) Working With and In Communities
By working with local communities angling-related organisations can help embrace wider community needs and
involve local people.
For angling to realise its potential within local communities there is a need for angling organisations to develop organisational
structures, facilities and activities that include non-angling local people. Sample approaches include:
•Creating or improving community facilities that are designed for multiple users
•Adopting new organisational structures to embrace different local interests
•Hold activities and events that attract a wider spectrum of the local population
The work of two very different organisations - the Wandle Trust and Get Hooked on Fishing in Billingham - are instructive in
this regard because they show how wider community involvement can be generated using distinct approaches.
114 http://resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/project_research_sites/site/36
115 Crabbe, T and Brown, A (2010) Breaking Barriers op cit: 59
57
Trust Director Dr Bella Davies explained that engaging non-anglers is both a deliberate and essential strategy:
‘The Wandle Trust has a very, very community-oriented base/origin, and – rightly – completely recognises that to do
anything in an urban area you need the complete support of the community, or at least as much as you can get. To do
that, you need to have extensive consultation and involvement with people.’
Trustee Gideon Reeve identified that a key consideration for The Trust was to address the public perception of it as a
community organisation, not one that only represents the interests of anglers:
‘We didn’t want to be seen as a glorified fishing club that was trying to feather its own nest ... I realised it is very good
that we are closely associated with fishermen if they are the right kind of fishermen, such as the Wandle Piscators. In
their constitution they state they are an environmental and community-based mixed fishing club. So there is no elitism, it
caters to everybody, it is about the community.’
This balance of community and angling interests has been fundamental to the Wandle Trust’s success.
GHOF Teesside have been instrumental in assisting the development of Charlton’s Pond, a local water situated in a housing
estate in Billingham. Once a site for anti-social behaviour, it was re-established as a productive fishing venue through a grant
secured by GHOFT and the angling club with the support of the EA. Key characteristics make it stand out as an example of
community engagement:
•Location in the urban environment making it accessible.
•A ’safe space’ where young people know members of the community, feel comfortable fishing on their own and form a
network of informal surveillance.
•Exit routes are created for young people to the on-site angling club to enable them to access regular positive activity and
GHOF’s personal and social development support.
•Inter generational and intra-community relationships are developed
•Junior matches become community ‘rituals’ where the Saturday ’weigh in’ becomes an all-community social event, and
a public celebration of young people’s achievements, including a ‘community procession’ around the pond.
The pond is used by record numbers of angling club members as well as local residents as a recreational space for walking,
picnicking and watching the wildlife.
‘It’s the community engagement as much as anything. Once that’s caught up, things seem to flow from there, the interest
grows...Where you get a community working together, even if it’s just starting from such basic recreational interests, they
can go on from there.’ (Interview with Jean O’Donnell, Councillor for south Billingham)
ii) Designing Assets for Multiple Uses
By creating assets that are used for non-angling purposes angling can assist community cohesion.
For water resources to assist community cohesion, they must be able to accommodate a variety of uses. Creating exclusive
angling use does not allow a sense of wider community ownership to develop, nor does it permit opportunities for interaction
between people. Multiple use that truly ‘opens up’ the asset needs to:
•Be based on design principles that ensure optimal use of space and resources.
•Involve formal and informal activities with ‘targeted’ and ‘open-access’ provision.
Albrighton Trust Moat and Gardens is an example of how angling-focused green space can help improve the quality of life
for people with disabilities and special needs. Located near Telford, the Moat and Gardens is an initiative that aims ‘to provide
inclusive social, learning and recreational opportunities for people with disabilities’. The architect-designed site incorporates
a network of wheelchair-friendly paths that enable access to a moat stocked with coarse fish species, seven large fishing
platforms, a themed garden, and a resource and learning centre.
4. Angling and Local Community Development
The Wandle Trust is a successful example of an organisation that began with angling interests to the fore, but has become
much more associated with a broader community remit. It has changed considerably in terms of its size and the composition
of its volunteers – river clean-up events have grown from a handful of anglers to typically attracting between 40-50 volunteers.
According to the Trust, many of the volunteers are either non-anglers or have little knowledge of angling on the river.
58
The Moat and Gardens serves a varied clientele, from young people with a physical or mental disability through to groups of
the elderly or infirm. Significantly, however, angling is not the sole attraction of the site – there are 35 themed garden beds, a
horticulture greenhouse, a small putting green, a boules pitch, and numerous picnic spaces – but it is central to the enjoyment
of many visitors.
GHOF North Lincolnshire have established a nature trail and pond-dipping area around the council-owned waters in
Immingham. This includes a series of ‘interpretation boards’ that detail the insect, bird and plant life in the area. Local schools
and families are encouraged to use the site as a space for their own environmental lessons.
iii) Making Assets Accessible
Local waters must be accessible to a range of people from different backgrounds.
Water-based community assets need to be accessible to people. This means not just physically accessible, but also
accessible in terms of cost, location and being welcoming to people from different backgrounds.
In some ways salmon angling in Scotland might appear to be the most inaccessible type of fishing– often in remote locations,
sometimes with limits on angler numbers, and frequently expensive. However, Stirling Council has shown how such barriers
can be overcome.
In Focus: Stirling Council Salmon Angling
Stirling Council either owns or manages the fishing rights for salmon and sea trout on a four-mile stretch of the
River Forth adjacent to the city (rated as the top producing beat in 2010), and two stretches of the River Teith near
Callander. The Council has implemented a number of measures to create a facility accessible to the local community.
•Resident Friendly Permits: Season and roving permits to local residents at subsidised prices with further
discounts for concessions specifically designed so that local residents are not priced out of access to this valuable
community resource.
•Conservation: Promotion of fish conservation and responsible angling with tags provided for landed fish,
encouragement of catch and release (in 2010 70% of caught fish were safely returned) and council run ‘fish in the
classroom’ projects with local schools.
•Sustainability: Additional revenue generated through a range of fishery management services (fish surveys, river
clean-ups, bank rehabilitation) for partner organisations.
•Disabled Access: Disabled platforms installed (Craigforth section of the River Forth (2001) and at the Geisher
Pool on the River Teith (2010) for use by anglers and other community members; paths constructed to access the
platforms providing benefit to other users such as children from the local nursery, bird-watchers and dog-walkers.
Increasing accessibility is also possible in even the most remote rural settings. The Culag Community Woodland Trust116
owns part of the Little Assynt estate in Assynt, North West Scotland. It has developed an all abilities path that circumnavigates
two of the lochs on the estate, creating access for the first time for people with limited mobility. The path is used not just by
local people but also visitors, and user groups include anglers, bird watchers and local schools.
116 www.culagwoods.org.uk
59
iv) Developing Volunteering
Angling participation already involves huge numbers of volunteers – but this could be further developed.
Volunteering is an important part of both community development policy and practice, and can help to turn spaces into the
kind of places people want to spend time in. Large numbers of anglers are involved in voluntary activities. At a local level we
have seen numerous instances of angling organisations and projects delivering important work, based largely – if not entirely –
on voluntary labour, taking on roles in club management, coaching and the organising of matches/angling events.
In our angling participation survey:
•25% (n=593) of anglers surveyed volunteered to help with habitat improvement
•22% (n=530) took part in teaching or coaching activities
•44% (n=1043) took part in angling club business, such as club governance
Using local volunteers has been a feature of Trout in the Town (TinTT) projects. We conducted a survey of TinTT volunteers
to determine the kind of activities they were getting involved in and the results are presented in the bar chart below. Anglers
who have committed to TinTT projects are involved in environmental rehabilitation activities like clean-ups and removing
invasive species; monitoring of invertebrate and fish populations; information sharing with community members; and young
people’s education.
Chart 4: Participation by TinTT volunteers in project activities (n=71)
In Stirling, the salmon fishery profiled earlier in this section benefits from the dedication of a group of passionate volunteers,
who assist on a range of river maintenance tasks. In some cases they conduct highly technical work like habitat surveys
alongside Council and Forth Fisheries Trust staff. Several volunteers from the Forth Fisheries Angling Association maintain the
small-scale hatchery that the Council uses as part of the Fish in the Classroom programme.
Angling organisations frequently rely upon significant amounts of volunteering in rural communities which supports the
wider economic benefits that angling can bring through tourism. For instance in Assynt (see Section 5) a small number of
individuals dedicate many hours to it voluntarily, and this is a vital contribution to the local community as a whole.
Angling based youth intervention projects such as Les Webber’s Angling Project (London) and Angling for Youth
Development (across Scotland) rely completely on volunteers for the delivery of their work. Volunteering opportunities are
not limited to adults, and young people are also building skills and experience for angling–related volunteering.
4. Angling and Local Community Development
Other good practice we have identified includes the Liverpool Parks Lake Scheme which offers free fishing across 8
park waters upon registration for a permit. This makes fishing particularly accessible for young people in urban centres who
have difficulty reaching out of town commercial fisheries and have little disposable income. Registration also strengthens the
relationships and responsibilities between anglers and park managers.
60
In Focus: Young People Volunteering - The GHOF Liverpool peer mentors
Youth angling charity Get Hooked On Fishing (GHOF) use peer mentoring as part of their personal and social
development programme, encouraging young people to regularly volunteer to teach other young people and
members of the wider community to fish. There were 22 peer mentors between the ages of 13 and 17 registered with
the GHOF Liverpool project for the period January 2010 to November 2010. The majority completed over 50 hours
of volunteering, with one peer mentor totalling 147 volunteer hours.
In a year, GHOF Liverpool peer mentors have the opportunity to volunteer over the course of 9 weeks. This period
includes school holidays (excluding the Christmas break and spring half term), where they assist in taster days and
open sessions at local parks. To receive their V50 awards peer mentors averaged 22.2 hours a month, with the
maximum being 65.3 hours a month. To give this contribution some context, the 2008-2009 Citizenship Survey:
Volunteering and Charitable Giving Topic Report found young people between the ages of 16-24 engaged in formal
volunteering for an average of 7.4 hours in the four weeks prior to being surveyed.117
Among the 2010 cohort of GHOF peer mentors, two have since gone on to gain their angling coaching Level 1
qualification and now assist in the delivery of GHOF sessions in schools.
Given that current government policy is actively promoting volunteering (for example through the National Citizenship Service),
angling should be well placed to develop:
•National volunteering schemes
•New partnerships with other agencies in youth, conservation and wildlife
•Support for training and management of volunteers at a local level
•An angling volunteer database on a local or regional basis
viii) Social Integration
Angling organisations and events can be the nexus around which people from different backgrounds can interact.
Ultimately, community cohesion is about people from different backgrounds mixing, working, living and playing together. Some
angling projects have been particularly successful in being the nexus around which such integration can occur. This has been
particularly notable in terms of inter-ethnic connections and intergenerational exchange.
There has been considerable concern expressed over recent years about people who are recent immigrants to the UK
undertaking angling practices that are seen as contradictory to accepted practice. In particular, this concern has focused
around East European and especially Polish anglers now living in Britain. Anglers from these backgrounds have been
observed keeping coarse fish species (notably carp) rather than returning them, because that is accepted practice in their
country of origin.
Although at times the media debate around this issue has verged on the xenophobic, there have been some innovative
approaches taken by local and national angling bodies that suggest a much more positive way forward:
•When the practices of Polish anglers were identified as a ‘problem’ by other anglers, Thames 21 helped to get the Polish
anglers involved in their work, including taking up coaching roles. This led to better understanding and working together.
•The Angling Trust’s Building Bridges project,118 funded by the EA, is being piloted in the South West and East of
England to help educate migrant workers about acceptable angling practices. This has led to much improved communication
and positive relationships between Eastern European and British anglers, and activities have included:
•The distribution of free multi-lingual signs for fisheries
•21 educational articles published in the Eastern European Media
•11 angling clubs engaged in project activities
•3 educational meetings were organised
•3,000 multi-language leaflets distributed via tackle shops or angling clubs available to download from
the Angling Trust website.
117 Department for Communities and Local Government (2010) 2008-2009 Citizenship Survey: Volunteering and Charitable Giving Topic
Report, London: DCLG.
118 www.anglingtrust.net/page.asp?section=709%A7ionTitle=Building+Bridges+with+Migrant+Anglers
61
Staging, promoting and getting involved in events are also good ways for angling organisations to play a role in community
integration. National Fishing Month (NFM)119 has been a focus for involving national organisations such as the Angling
Development Board and local clubs and fisheries, in the delivery of hundreds of angling events, including events for: British
Blind Sport Participants; family intervention programmes; and black and minority ethnic communities.
4.3 Issues and Recommendations
4.3.1 New Organisational Relationships
At a national level, changes to the role of the EA and other agencies such as British Waterways present the opportunity for
new strategic partnerships between angling, government and non governmental organisations. While these examples relate
closely to environmental work (explored in detail in Section 3), other changes also related to the ‘big society’ agenda mean
that there are new organisational relationships possible for the angling sector.
Changes in the provision of public health (with responsibilities moving from PCTs to doctors and local councils) and the
delivery of local authority services offer commissioning possibilities at a more local level. In health, education, environment,
sport and leisure and young people’s services, angling can help provide some of the answers to community development.
Although the localism agenda offers some new possibilities for angling’s role in local communities, national angling
organisations need to help guide and inform local developments. Also local government spending cuts and a lack of resources
mean that the capacity of angling organisations in relation to the ‘right to provide’ and ‘right to buy’ legislation in the UK needs
to be addressed.
4.3.2 New Organisational Models
If angling organisations are to play a leading role in new models of community development, especially in relation to local asset
development, then new organisational models need to be explored, understood and supported.
Angling clubs are most often formed as membership clubs, often without being legally constituted bodies. Others are more
formally structured, especially if they own or lease significant amounts of waters. Some are formally constituted charities and
a few are social enterprises, but this is the exception rather than the rule. However, the localism agenda emphasises the role
that charities, co-operatives and social enterprises should play.
For angling organisations to take advantage of new opportunities in their locality around asset management or service delivery,
there is a need for improved knowledge of different corporate structures. This could involve:
•Distribution of advice and support about different organisational structures
•Work at a national level by angling bodies to develop relationships with organisations such as Co-operatives UK to provide
guidance and resources
•Work at a local level to adopt new organisational structures in order to take up new roles and facilitate wider community
engagement.
119 www.nationalfishingmonth.com NFM is owned and run by the Angling Trades Association and supported by the Environment Agency,
Angling Development Board, Professional Anglers Association and Angling Trust.
4. Angling and Local Community Development
Angling projects can also assist in bridging gaps between young people – often identified solely as a ‘problem’ in local and
national media – and other members of the community. As part of NACRO’s Reading Angling Project, a group of young
people not in education, employment or training (NEET) were encouraged to design and deliver an angling coaching event for
community members. Young people on the project identified elderly residents, many of whom were non anglers, as potential
beneficiaries and invited them to participate in an angling taster day they had organised. These types of events provide
opportunities for young people and community members to interact; and demonstrate to both young people themselves and
the wider community that young people can be valuable, active members of society. Local waters are emerging as key sites for
this type of community engagement.
62
In Focus: New Partnerships - The Scottish Canal Project
The Scottish Federation for Coarse Anglers (SFCA) has struck a landmark deal with British Waterways that will
now allow SFCA to offer free fishing to under 16s on the lowland canal system that runs across the central belt
of Scotland. Gus Brindle chairman of the SFCA explains that it is their intention to establish coaches and Angling
Induction Centres across the canal system to coordinate junior angling clubs, coaching and education.
To fish for free will require signing up for a free junior SFCA membership, and means young people are incorporated
into the angling network form an early age where they will receive the training and support they need to become
successful anglers. The Scottish canal system is an excellent resource as it passes through many deprived urban
centres. Encouraging fishing access on these waters maximises local resources to provide a positive activity that will
have a direct impact on young people and community well-being.
Taking the lead from SFCA and British Waterways it is important for local authorities and land owners to re-appraise
their waters and consider whether they could support the well-being of young people and their local communities
through angling provisions.
4.3.3 Local Authorities
Although our research has highlighted examples where local authorities work very positively with angling, at other times this
has not been the case and on occasion some local authorities have appeared hostile towards angler use of facilities.
The Angling Trust has already supported some local angling groups in addressing local authority measures – for example
lobbying to help reverse Rother council’s proposed bylaw to restrict sea anglers120. However there is a need to:
i) Make sure local authorities and the wider community understand the community benefits delivered through angling so that
they can make informed decisions about the use of local waters.
ii) Develop guidance and advice on how to successfully manage local waters for wider community benefit – including
information on how to encourage multiple use sites, manage user conflicts, and ensure accessibility to a broad section of
residents.
Further guidance on how local authorities and angling can work positively together can be found in our interim report
Making the Most of Community Waters121.
4.3.4 Maximising Angling’s Potential
Although our research has considered a number of examples where angling is directly addressing local agendas, and where
angling organisations are assisting in community asset and service development, much more could be done. This should
include national angling organisations, working with partners to develop:
•Volunteering opportunities including work with the National Citizenship Service, Muck in 4Life, and green exercise initiatives.
•Resources and support for local organisations to adopt new organisational structures
•New relationships between the Angling Trust and Local Government Association, to publicise existing work and broaden
angling’s involvement with local authorities
•Identification of new funding streams, such as the new Coastal Communities Fund across the UK122 to develop national,
regional and local projects in coastal areas.
•Best practice and practitioner guides, building on this research, in working with communities and working with local
authorities
•Exploration of new ways of raising capital finance such as community shares schemes123
At a regional level, the Angling Development Boards and County Angling Action Groups (CAAGs) can support local angling
organisations to make links with local government, health services, and community organisations.
120 Angling Trust (2011) Angling Trust Calls On All Councils To Follow Rother’s Lead And Back Sea Angling, Media Releas
121 Brown, A et al (2011) op cit.
122 http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/press_86_11.htm
123 www.communityshares.org.uk
63
In Brief
This section details the impact of angling in rural and remote communities. It illustrates:
•The valuable contribution that angling tourism can make to rural communities in terms of
economic impact and wider tourism development
•How development of good practice means angling can contribute to sustainable rural
community development through employment and cultural heritage.
5.1 Introduction and Context
‘The experience [of foot and mouth disease] clearly demonstrated how much people value the countryside and the
relationship between agriculture and other economic activities, especially tourism and recreation.’ 124
The importance of tourism to sustaining rural areas has been emphasised in the last two decades:
• In response to the Foot and Mouth outbreak in the UK in 2001, there was a push for greater diversification of rural
economies. In England and Wales the Environment Agency (among others) highlighted angling tourism as a potential source
of external income for rural areas. 125
• In Scotland there has been a growing interest in the contribution that ‘country sports’ in general, including angling, can
make to rural development; and of marketing tourism based on ‘distinctive regional opportunities’.126
• The Environment Agency in England and Wales, and recent reports from the Scottish Executive have calculated that
expenditure from participation in angling has a significant impact in rural areas.
• More generally there has been a desire to see: diversification of rural businesses; increased rural income and
employment development; and sustainable strategies for addressing rural exclusion issues (including housing, youth
unemployment, isolation, transport and seasonal economies).
The increased awareness and understanding of angling’s contribution to rural economies has led to the emergence of a
number of recent initiatives aiming to promote angling tourism and re-invigorate rural areas. They include:
• Fishing Wales, a partnership between the Environment Agency Wales and Wales Tourist Board which seeks to promote
Wales as ‘the premiere destination for game, sea and coarse fishing’. 127
• The promotion of angling within a broader portfolio of ‘country sports’ by the Scottish Country Sports Tourism Group,
including a pilot initiative in 2008 to promote wild brown trout angling in Assynt, Sutherland128.
• The promotion within English regions of angling tourism that includes work in Northumberland; an angling festival in the
124 DEFRA (2004) Review of the Rural White Paper: Our countryside: the future, London: DEFRA p22
125 Ibid; Environment Agency (2004) Our Nations Fisheries, Bristol: EA
126 TNS (2004) Country Sports Tourism in Scotland, Perth: Scottish Country Sports Tourism Group http://countrysportscotland.com/About.
asp ; Highlands and Islands Enterprise (2011) Operating Plan 2011-2014, Inverness: HIE http://www.hie.co.uk/about-hie/about-hie/
what-we-do.html
127 www.fishing.visitwales.com
128 www.countrysportscotland.com; Brown, A. (2009) Angling and Rural Areas: The Assynt Angling Study: Interim Report for the Social
and Community Benefits of Angling Project, Manchester: Substance. http://resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/sites/resources.
anglingresearch.org.uk/files/Research_Task_3_Assynt_Angling_Rural_Areas.pdf
5. Angling and Rural Communities
5. Angling and Rural
Communities
64
Lake District run in 2009, 2010 and 2011129; and the development of an ‘angling passport’ scheme for visitors and residents,
as implemented by the Wye and Usk Foundation and the Westcountry Rivers Trust130.
Yet despite the growing body of policy, research and practice based initiatives to promote angling in rural areas, little is known
about angling’s impact in particular rural communities, the different ways in which it involves local people and visitors, and the
ways in which it can contribute to the development of sustainable rural communities.
Our research focused on a case study of a small remote rural community, Assynt, in the county of Sutherland, far North
West Scotland. Our research involved both quantitative and qualitative data collection, and comprised: online and face to
face surveys of anglers and other visitors; semi-structured interviews with over 50 visiting anglers; visitor postcode mapping
and angling permit surveys; an action research initiative that explored the use of new technology for information provision;
and angler feedback. Findings from this work have informed broader recommendations about angling tourism and rural
development.
In Focus: Assynt
Assynt is an area of outstanding natural beauty and natural scientific interest and is historically significant in terms of
Highland development and land ownership. Assynt has around 1000 inhabitants131 living in 475km2 of mostly remote
mountainous landscape. Its nearest major population centre is Inverness, over 2 hours drive away.
Assynt faces challenges common to many remote and rural areas, such as:
• A seasonal tourist economy
• Declining owner occupancy and rising house prices (in two of its townships, Stoer and Clachtoll, over 50%
of homes are holiday homes)
• Although ward statistics132 show a spread of different employment categories, 30.2% of employment is in
distribution, hotels and restaurants, the second highest category after the public sector (32.4%)
• Average unemployment lies at 3.8%133, with seasonal peaks and troughs.134
5.2 The Benefits of Angling for Rural Communities
Angling can contribute to rural communities in diverse ways; in addition to the direct impacts on local economies
generated by angling tourism, there is a range of more nuanced impacts, such as reducing seasonality effects
and sustaining cultural heritage.
129 www.cumbriafishingfestival.co.uk
130 See http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org; www.wrt.org.uk/projects/anglingpassport/anglingpassport.html
131 The 2001 census said that the population of the Assynt Community Council area in 2001 was 953
132 Ibid
133 Source: Highland Council: http://www.highland.gov.uk accessed on 17.12.10
134 MacLeod, K (2007) Assynt Area Profile, Lochinver: Assynt Office Services for Assynt Crofters Trust
65
Angling tourism can be extremely important in terms of the economic contribution that visiting anglers make
to rural areas.
In 2001 Sharpley and Craven warned that in the UK ‘the scope of tourism in rural areas remains largely unrecognised.’135 This
situation has changed over the last decade, with the publication of some notable studies that have emphasised the importance
of outdoor recreation based tourism to rural economies:
• The Country Sports Tourism Group of Scotland report in 2004 estimated the value of country sports in Scotland at around
£200m, and that 67% of the value of game and coarse angling was attributable to visiting anglers.136
• Other studies have emphasised the contribution of angling to specific areas. Some have centred on specific river
catchments,suchastheSQWreportontheRiverTweedwhichestimatedaGVAof£7msupporting487FTEjobsfrom
angling; others have taken a regional focus, such as the Nautilus (2006) study estimating local resident spending of £110m
and visitor spending of £165m in the South West region of England.137
• The value of freshwater fishing (Radford 2007) and sea angling (Drew 2004, Radford 2009) to the national economy has
also raised the profile of angling as a driver of economic development.138
• In a broader sense, a recent study in Scotland has also sought to assess the ‘social value’ of natural spaces in Scotland.
The Scottish National Heritage’s 2010 report estimated the value of ‘nature based tourism’ at £1.4 billion, with 39,000
associated FTE jobs.139
Although diversification has been recognised as an increasingly important element in sustainable rural development, the
relative impact that angling can make is less often understood within particular communities, and in the wider context
of regional economies and employment figures.
In 2009 and 2010 we surveyed visiting anglers in Assynt (n=125) to determine the average expenditure by anglers in a
number of areas. We used estimates of total visiting angler numbers (at 1,200 and 1,500 per year) and standard multipliers to
estimate the economic contribution to the area:
• Between £887,000 and £1,109,000 contribution by visiting anglers annually
• A Gross Value Added of £345,840-£432,300
• Employment impact of between 25 and 31 Full Time Equivalent jobs
Whilst this is a study of just one remote rural area, there are some findings that have relevance for other rural communities:
• It suggests that angling tourism can play a significant role in bringing income into small rural areas, and can help
sustain employment in often economically fragile communities.
• Local, regional or national governments, or statutory and regional agencies, should consider investment in angling-based
tourism initiatives to increase economic benefits through increased numbers.
• Should the numbers of anglers visiting in a year increase, the benefit of this should also increase proportionately
across economic indicators (a 10% increase in the numbers of angler stays in Assynt could result in 3 FTEs and an
additional £100,000 economic contribution).
• In an internationally competitive market, where rural areas have a distinctive angling offer, this can assist in creating
a ‘USP’ to attract visitors.
135 Sharpley R, Craven B. (2001) ‘The 2001 Foot and Mouth crisis: rural economy and tourism policy implications: a comment’, Current
Issues in Tourism 4(6): p 527–537.
136 TNS (2004) op cit.: 2
137SQW(2006)Economic Impact from Angling on the Tweed River System; Nautilus (2005) The Motivation, Demographics and Views of
South West Recreational Sea Anglers and their Socio-economic Impact on the Region
138 Radford A., Riddington, G. and Gibson, H. (2009) The Economic evaluation of inland fisheries: The economic impact of freshwater
angling in England & Wales Bristol: EA Science Report SC050026/SR2; Drew Associates (2004) Research Into the Economic
Contribution of Sea Angling; Radford, A. Riddington, G. and Gibson, H. (2009) Economic Impact of Recreational Sea Angling in
Scotland, Edinburgh: Scottish Government
139 Bryden, D.M., Westbrook, S.R., Burns, B., Taylor, W.A., and Anderson, S. (2010) Assessing the Economic Impacts of Nature Based
Tourism in Scotland Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 398
5. Angling and Rural Communities
5.2.1 The Economic Contribution of Angling Tourism
66
5.2.2 Lengthening the Tourist Season
One particular way that angling can contribute to tourism in rural areas is that it can help ‘lengthen’ the tourist season and
thereby reduce the peaks and troughs associated with seasonality. For many rural areas, and in particular remote ones where
the length of travel tends to mean people stay for relatively longer periods (a week or two weeks according to our surveys),
tourist trade can be focused on relatively short periods in the year. Due to the varying seasonality of different types of angling
in different locations, this benefit will be at different times of the year in different places.
As part of our research in Assynt we mapped the sale of trout angling permits in 2009 and 2010. The graph below illustrates
how angling can encourage visitation outside the principal holiday periods – in this case (where game angling is most
prominent) on the ‘shoulders’ of the summer season in May, June and in September.
Assynt Angling Group Total
Assynt Crofters Trust Total
Chart 5: Trout Angling Rods per Day in Assynt 2010
As part of our work we have also suggested ways in which additional promotion of different angling opportunities in the Assynt
area could extend this impact further, such as:
• Specialist ferox140 angling in the early season/April
• Further promotion of trout angling in mid-late May
• Family angling offers for the July and Scottish summer holiday periods
• Offers for trout and salmon fishing ‘combo’ deals in September
Although our study was specific to one area, in other areas winter sea fishing, early season salmon angling, spring coarse
fishing or autumn grayling fishing might be a different focus.
5.2.3 Offsetting Declines in Other Forms of Tourism
Specialist outdoor activity based tourism, such as angling, can also help rural areas offset more general declines in visitor
numbers. Other studies have recognised the contribution of developing niche or special interest tourism in offsetting such
declines141 and the development of tourist loyalty and repeat visitation. This can be enhanced further by dedicated project and
promotional work (such as our project which emphasised information provision to niche markets).
Our surveys of visiting anglers in Assynt highlighted the ‘loyalty’ many had to the area – between 70% and 80% had visited
Assynt previously and a significant number of anglers interviewed had visited on multiple occasions. This suggests that angling
can assist in retaining visitors from one year to the next when more general tourism declines.
140 Ferox trout are predatory and cannibalistic brown trout that can grow very large.
141 Carson D and Schmalleger, D, Fishing ‘The Big Rivers in Australia’s Northern Territory: Market diversification for the Daly River’
in Prideaux, B. and Cooper, M. (eds.) (2009) River Tourism, CAB International pp131-149
67
• In 2010 there was an estimated 12% decline in all visitors to Assynt but a 25% increase in income from trout angling permits
for the Assynt Angling Association (AAA), with an additional 10% increase in permit income for the AAA in 2011
• In 2011 the Assynt Crofters’ Trust recorded a 10% increase in permit income gross takings since 2009.
This suggests that specialist work on angling – such as our project’s provision of centralised high quality information – can
help maintain and increase angler tourism even in the context of wider tourism downturns.
5.2.4 Contributing to ‘Portfolio Employment’
Angling tourism has a role to play in a portfolio of rural employment – an economic strategy that is often an essential part of
rural economies, enabling households and businesses to draw consistent income in an economy affected by seasonality.
The AIRE project undertaken by Newcastle and Durham universities in 2009 generated some important findings in relation to
angling and the economic development of rural communities in the North Yorkshire region. It found that:
• Different types of angling produce very different economic impacts
• Angling businesses in rural areas need to be appreciated within the context of a larger and sometimes complex
economic ‘jigsaw’
• Angling income can be small, but can also be very important - a difference between viability and non viability in some cases
• Angling tends to be ‘invisible’ in policy/development contexts and in England it is frequently not linked to rural development
initiatives because it falls ‘below the radar of development indicators’.142
The ‘small but significant’ role angling can play in household or business income is also reflected in our research into angling’s
impact in rural areas. In such areas, many people have a ‘portfolio of employment’ that involves different jobs at different times
of the year, reflecting seasonal variations in agriculture and tourism.
For example, in Assynt, angling helps to support the viability of families or businesses by adding extra income for example
through permit sales or tourism related services. In Yorkshire as the AIRE project found, this income is often not enough
to register on regional development employment measures, yet it can make an important difference at the household/small
business level.
5.2.5 The Cultural Heritage of Rural Communities
Angling is also an activity that can be an important element of the cultural heritage of rural areas, steeped in a cultural history
that defines communities and contributes to a collective identity. This is also an added attraction to visiting anglers and
something rural communities can help research, develop and display.
As part of our research in Assynt we began to collate an online archive of material including:
• Historic literature detailing visitors’ experiences dating back to the mid 19th century
• Digitally recording hotel angling records dating back to the 1880s
• Collecting old photographs and making old cine footage available.143
This material has been made available electronically on a project-specific website, as well as being displayed in the local
Tourist Information Centre at Lochinver. It is also being submitted to the Assynt Community Archive housed in the communityowned Lochinver Mission building. The ACA is an excellent example of good practice in the management of cultural heritage,
enabling community groups and individuals – from the area as well as elsewhere - to digitise and catalogue archive material.144
This kind of angling-specific archiving can sit alongside other community initiatives such as historical society projects and
helps a community to ‘know itself’ as well as preserve and communicate its history to visitors.145
142 Oughton, L, Wheelock, J, Whitman, G. (2009) ‘The Move to Still Waters: the rural development implications’ paper presented to Angling
in the Rural Environment, Dissemination Conference, York, May 27th 2009.
143 http://assynt.anglingresearch.org.uk/?q=angling_history
144 http://www.dspacedev2.org/index.php?option=com_content&catid=85&id=3558&view=article ; http://www.lochinvermission.org.uk/
145 Assynt demonstrates some very good practice in this regard – the voluntary work of Historic Assynt (www.historicassynt.co.uk) and the
Assynt Historical Society (www.normist.co.uk/mills.htm) has helped restore historic buildings in the area and provide information and
interpretation signage at key sites that are valued by visitors (not just anglers).
5. Angling and Rural Communities
In Assynt, during our research, there was a notable increase in angling tourism during the lifetime of our project:
68
5.3 Increasing the Impact of Angling Tourism
Our research has explored a number of ways in which angling tourism can be enhanced.
5.3.1 Provision and Presentation of Information
In some rural areas, especially where recreational angling is provided by more than one supplier/landowner, information
for visitors can be piecemeal, difficult to get hold of and sometimes confusing or outdated. In our research we sought
to address this through the:
• Design of a bespoke website to provide a one-stop information point as well as feedback tools for visiting anglers
• Online mapping of angling locations, utilising Ordnance Survey map technologies which are particularly suited to rural areas
• Use of the online map to collect angler feedback about their experiences fishing in particular locations and facilitate up
to date peer-to-peer advice
• Use of the website as a portal for local angling history, information on other forms of fishing, wildlife reports and other
activities
• Production of a booklet comprising summary information on all angling opportunities in the area distributed to
accommodation providers, tourist agencies and angling organisations
• Development of an angling ’hub’ using designated space in the tourist information centre, featuring poster displays, leaflets
and free use of a computer with access to the bespoke website.
Such initiatives are popular with visiting anglers and could be easily replicated to promote angling in other rural areas.
69
Part of our research took an action research approach to case study work. This included testing new technological
solutions to the provision of information and the generation of angler feedback.
The problem: No central point of information; a number of different angling providers producing their own
information; poor access to the internet in self-catering accommodation; and almost no solid data on visiting anglers
or what they caught.
The solution: The Assynt Information and Research website, and in particular the digital, interactive, online map,
based on Ordnance Survey’s OpenSpace API. The map included:
• Over 100 angling locations tagged by a map marker
• A ‘zoom-in’ feature providing precise topographical information about angling locations and routes
• ‘Click through’ facility giving location, access, permit and other details.
• A comment tool on each location allowing anglers to post feedback about their experiences and share them
with others
Making it work: Apart from providing the map we also publicised it on internet forums and in angling and
mainstream press146 to raise awareness; we reached an agreement with Visit Scotland to provide dedicated PC
access in the Lochinver Tourist Information Centre and distributed leaflets and posters locally.
Our map tool was recognised by the OS as an example of good innovative practice147 and has been very heavily
used by visiting anglers. The website visit statistics include:
• 22,098 visits
• 10,457 unique visitors
• 106,294 page views
• An average of 5 pages viewed per visit
146 www.assynt.anglingresearch.org.uk/press
147 Ordnance Survey (2010) ‘New Users Harness the Power of OpenSpace’, Media Release http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/
media/news/2009/october/osopenspace.html
5. Angling and Rural Communities
In Focus: Mapping the Rural Angling Offer – www.assynt.anglingresearch.org.uk
70
5.3.2 Increasing Access to Angling
Making angling accessible to visitors is not just about generating accurate information, but also about ensuring the angling
offer is easily understood, affordable and well-publicised.
Developments in several rural areas in the UK demonstrate the effectiveness of ‘angling passport schemes’. The first of these
was developed by the Westcountry Rivers Trust and Wye and Usk Foundation, and has been followed by similar schemes in
the Eden, Ribble and Tyne areas. These schemes help to bring together formerly disparate sources of information and permits
for angling and make it easy for visitors to access previously inaccessible angling.
The staging of angling festivals can also help to advertise angling in areas that might be better known for other activities or
attractions:
• The Cumbrian fishing festival which began in 2009 has helped to make the wide variety of fishing available in the Lake
District more widely known and attracted visitors in mid-May.
• The Bridlington ‘European Open’ sea angling festival brings large numbers of visitors from long distances to the area in
February and March each year, increasing tourism impact in low season
‘I annually attend the beach fishing comp at Bridlington, 280 miles from my home; it’s now called the European Open.
It’s a great 5 day stay and winter break. Four of us go up each year, and it’s the only competition we compete in.’
(Survey comment made by 45 year old male sea angler)
In Assynt, a number of changes since the early 1990s have assisted in increasing angler tourist numbers:
• The Assynt Crofters Trust buy-out of the North Assynt Estate made trout angling in the whole of that area available for
minimal cost to visitors
• The formation of the Assynt Angling Association in 2000 created a ‘mini-passport scheme’ bringing together all other trout
angling in Assynt under one banner
• Public access to angling was also increased as a result of the Assynt and Coigach Protection Order.
• The marketing of salmon and sea trout angling on the two primary rivers in the area from 2010 by CKD Galbraith, has
broadened the price range of rod days and made it available to all visitors (not just hotel guests).
71
One of the ways in which angling tourism can be developed is by positioning it within a broader outdoor recreation ‘offer’.
Our research suggests that the motivations for anglers are much broader than simply going fishing, and tapping into these
motivations can help ‘deepen’ the attraction of certain locations for anglers – whether in the South West of England, the Lake
District, Wales orother parts of Scotland.
We asked anglers in our Assynt Anglers Survey in 2010 to identify the most important things about angling in Assynt. The
results are presented in the bar chart below. Although the catch-related aspects of the angling experience – most notably the
quality of fish stocks – perhaps inevitably received a large number of 1st place rankings, the remoteness, fishing mountain
lochs, being able to fish without seeing others and the scenery in which people go fishing scored highest overall. These results
suggest that anglers who visit Assynt value the social isolation and the quality of the landscape at least as much as they do the
actual fishing.
Chart 6: Responses to ‘Please rank from 1 to 4 the four most important things to you about fishing in Assynt.’
(Assynt Anglers’ Survey 2010)
In qualitative interviews, anglers stressed the importance of hill walking in particular as an additional and associated activity.
‘It’s not just the fishing up there. One of the things I love is being out in the hills. We hike a lot, that’s one of the great
pleasures of it.’
Anglers also reported their interest in flora and fauna, organised walks put on by the Highland Council Ranger Service and
activities such as kayaking and mountain climbing.
More generally, these findings suggest that there may be an opportunity for rural areas to maximise the attractiveness of their
area by highlighting the range of outdoor activities on offer and even making links between the two. This is particularly relevant
to rural areas in the UK given the variable weather and water level conditions.
5. Angling and Rural Communities
5.3.3 Developing Angling within Outdoor Recreation Based Tourism
72
5.3.4 Clustering Businesses and Co-operative Competition
Some tourism studies contend that ‘clustering’ visitor-related services in remote rural areas can assist the production of
a greater overall economic benefit. Research by Jackson and Murphy at La Trobe University in Australia148 applied Porter’s
clustering theory to rural development, and as a result surmised that more benefit can be derived from activity-based
tourism by:
i) Understanding demand better and the local ‘USP’ in relation to other areas
ii) Working cooperatively and developing local networks
iii) Developing work between complementary businesses
iv) Using government support to assist new developments
v) Developing interdependent businesses in ‘cooperative competition’
vi) Support work by developing research and training
Clustering approaches have been developed, for instance, in relation to wine tourists where regional tours of vineyards,
wine purchases, food and accommodation providers all work together to create packages that create mutual benefits. Such
‘clustering’ and ‘cooperative competition’ can also operate on both an intra-regional basis (e.g. within a particular rural
community) and inter-regional basis (e.g. across wider areas or regions).
Our research in Assynt suggested that although such cooperation does occur, it happens on an ad hoc basis. In relation to
angling tourism, there is the potential to further develop co-operative approaches both in terms of ‘general’ tourists and visiting
anglers. This might include:
• Marketing of ‘accommodation and fishing’ packages in which small discounts might be offered and services such as
provision of permits and angling information are offered on arrival
• Packages to promote low demand periods of the year, such as multiple activities for families
• Developing ‘angler friendly’ schemes for accommodation and food businesses
• Cross-marketing and further development of other outdoor activities with fishing – walking, climbing, mountain biking,
kayaking, wildlife watching, guided ‘walk-and-fish’ tours
• Food initiatives such as ‘eat what you catch’ offers at local restaurants
• Signposting between businesses to ensure visitors use local services
5.3.5 Land Ownership and Community Benefit
One way in which rural communities can collectively benefit from angling is through common ownership of land and riparian
rights. Income earned directly from the sale of fishing permits can then be used for purposes that benefit either local
community organisations or collective angling organisations. This is not to say that other forms of land ownership do not allow
wider benefit from angling in rural areas, but rather that collective organisations can deliver added value in this regard.
In Scotland, the Scottish Land Reform Act 2004 has given communities the right to buy land if it comes up for sale,
provided a number of conditions are met. In England, the new Localism Act (2011) gives communities the right to
nominate land as assets of community value, something discussed in Section 4 of this report. These two pieces of legislation
provide opportunities for rural communities to generate direct economic benefit from angling held collectively for use by
the community.
Our research in Assynt allowed us to examine how angling is managed within different forms of rural business structure and
land ownership in the area. This helps to demonstrate how direct angling income from permit sales can help support the work
of community owned organisations:
• The Assynt Crofters Trust (ACT) is a cooperative trust of crofters who won an historic right to buy their land in 1993149.
Income from angling is the single biggest source of profit for the ACT, contributing to the work of the collectively owned trust.
ACT income increased from £6,102 in 2009, to £6,720 in 2011.
148 Jackson, J. and Murphy, P. (2002) ‘Tourism Destinations as Clusters: Analytical Experiences From The New World’, Tourism and
Hospitality Research, Vol.4, Nº1, pp. 36-52.
149 MacAskill, J. (1999) We Have Won the Land: the story of the purchase by the Assynt Crofters’ Trust of the North Lochinver Estate,
Stornoway: Acair
73
In addition, income from permit sales has been reinvested in improving the AAA fishing experience, particularly through the
increased provision of boats which are much valued by visiting anglers and help to generate ongoing revenue. Local angling
groups have also been supported in other ways. A guide booklet, Trout Fishing in Assynt compiled by local angling expert
Cathel Macleod, produced by the Scottish Country Sports Tourism Group in conjunction with our research, has helped raise
further funds for collective benefit.
5.4 Striking a Balance: Issues in Angling Tourism Development
One of the most important factors in promoting angling-based tourism in rural areas is balancing the desire for increased
visitor numbers and associated economic growth with the potential social, economic, cultural and environmental impacts
related to tourism development. This is a particular concern in rural areas where wild fish stocks may be more sensitive to
increased angling pressure than commercial or stocked fisheries. There are two related issues at stake:
• Whether developing angling tourism in rural areas creates too much ‘angling pressure’ and damages sensitive fish stocks
or the environment.
• What impact angling tourism has on the visiting angler experience, either through exceeding social carrying capacity
or ‘over development’.
Increasingly, rural industries have to operate within parameters that conserve the special qualities of rural areas150 – and
angling is no different. Angling tourism needs to function within the broader context of ‘ecotourism’, defined as supporting
environmental, economic and social/cultural sustainability,151 if it is to be considered a viable component of rural development.
Our research has highlighted some common dilemmas:
i) The need to implement sustainable management systems to protect fragile areas;
ii) The need to mediate between the at times different aims of conservation, preservation and local development;
iii) The need to encourage balanced, broad-based but community-focused economic growth.
5.4.1 Angling Pressure and the Environment
The effect of angling tourism on the ecology of the destination is one that is not confined to our study nor to the UK. Zwirn et
al’s study of the potential of angling tourism in Russia argued that:
‘When angling tourists reach threatened freshwater ecosystems… there is a risk of degrading the very fishery and
landscapes that attracted them, thwarting long term economic development prospects and reducing biodiversity… we
believe that angling can be legitimately considered a form of ecotourism that contributes positively to conservation,
science, and local or regional economic development.152
However, the AIRE project found that angling development can have a mixed impact on natural habitats and biodiversity153 and
our research in Assynt recorded the concerns of some anglers that any ‘development’ of angling or increase in angler numbers
would both harm fish stocks and mean that there were too many anglers.
‘Please do not ”develop” and ”improve” the angling to attract more visitors. The fishing pressure is about right and doing
anymore will damage the very point of wild trout fishing in wild places!’ (Online comment submitted August 2009)’
150 Sharpley, R. and Roberts, L. (2004) ‘Rural Tourism - 10 Years On’ International Journal Of Tourism Research, 6, 119–124: 119
151 Honey, M. (1999) Ecotourism and Sustainable Development: Who Owns Paradise? Washington, DC: Island Press quoted in Zwirn, M.,
Pinsky, M., and Rahr, G. (2005) ‘Angling Ecotourism: Issues, Guidelines and Experience from Kamchatka’, Journal of Ecotourism,4:1,1631: 22
152 Zwirn et al (2005) op cit
153 Lucas, M (2009) ‘Angling, Biodiversity and the European Context’, paper presented to Angling in the Rural Environment, Dissemination
Conference, York, May 27th 2009.
5. Angling and Rural Communities
• The Assynt Angling Association (AAA) is a collection of other landowners in the area that is responsible for the sale of
trout permits. Proceeds are distributed to a range of land owners, including some charities and local trusts:
• The Assynt Foundation, a community trust that owns the 40,000 acres Gelncanisp and Drumrunie estates. Income
from angling to the trust was £1,288 in 2009; £1,291 (2010) and £1,835 (2011)
• The Culag Community Woodland Trust, a charitable organisation that manages the Little Assynt estate and has
developed all abilities access as well as benefited from a new boat one of its lochs with income from the AAA
• The Assynt Angling Club is a long standing local angling organisation that receives significant income from the
AAA sales.
74
‘Please keep it wild. This is a precious resource and one of the last wildernesses in Europe. In the last few years I have
seen the first signs of unacceptable developments that if continued will begin to destroy the point of this area that brings
people who care.’ (Survey comment submitted June 2010)’
Part of the solution to such issues is having adequate ongoing monitoring both of angler numbers and of fish stocks. However,
this is neither straightforward nor easy for often poorly resourced rural communities and angling organisations. In the Assynt
case, although it is a historically renowned angling destination that attracts hundreds of anglers every year, there has been
almost no natural sciences research about the brown trout population154; minimal catch returns; and very little monitoring of
angler numbers and ‘angling pressure’.
Our research has explored a number of ways in which these shortcomings could be addressed at low cost:
• Development of a web site with interactive OS mapping that allows anglers to feedback information on their
experience and catches
• Use of online survey tools for catch returns
• A survey of permit sales (through analysis of permit stubs) in order to:
• Calculate total rod day numbers
• ‘Map’ angling pressure across a year
• Understand maximum, minimum and average rods fishing in Assynt on any one day
Our permit survey provided some particularly firm evidence on which to base debates about angler numbers in Assynt.
It showed that for an area of several hundred lochs and lochans, during the vast majority of the year angling numbers are
very low:
• On only 12% (n=21) of available days there were more than 30 rods fishing.
• On exactly half the total days (92 days) there were between 5 and 20 rods
• For 20% of the time (36 days) there are less than 5 rods fishing in Assynt
Chart 7: Trout Angler ‘Rods per day’ in Assynt, 2010
Irrespective of the specificities of our case study, the provision of accurate angling participation information to inform
developments is essential.
5.4.2 Social Carrying Capacity
The need to maintain the ‘rurality’ of rural areas155 has been a key objective of policy makers and rural development agencies.
This is in part because an absence of ‘development’ – particularly but not exclusively of the built environment – is something
that is important to residents and is attractive to visitors.
154 Stephen, A. (1986) The Brown Trout Project; and some work by the West Sutherland Fisheries Trust
155 Sharpley, R. and Roberts, L. (2004) op cit: p121
75
Our surveys of anglers in Assynt suggested that being able to fish alone, or with a small group, and not see other anglers was
an appealing feature of angling in the area. In our 2010 survey, although quality of fish stocks and the fishing were the main
motivators, the ‘feeling of remoteness’ and ‘being able to fish without seeing others’ followed close behind. This was also
referred to in several of the interviews we conducted:
‘Part of the attraction is spending a day in the hill and not seeing another living soul ! It would be good if the
management of this fishery was able to maintain this as much as possible, whilst still increasing visitor numbers. It
could be done.’ (Assynt angler interview 2011)
However, for others angling in Assynt there doesn’t appear to be any problem at all:
‘I’m wondering if there is any fisherman in Assynt?! I’ve been, in the last seven days, in more than twenty lochs, most
of them around two hours of walk from the first car park, and I haven’t met ONE fisherman. But lot of deers and,
sometimes, very nice trouts.’ (Comment submitted online by French angler July 2011)
Alongside monitoring the numbers of anglers (or rod days) and their distribution across the year, feedback from anglers
about their experience is required to continually inform communities about the social qualities of angler
experiences. The type of data gathering we developed makes it possible to identify when and where numbers could be
increased as well as managing where anglers fish.
5.4.3 Local Capacity
Although angling in rural areas can form part of a portfolio of income for local residents, the local angling offer is often
heavily reliant on a small number of people, many of whom are volunteers. The capacity of an area to maintain and
develop angling and increase community benefit from it can consequently be severely limited by the availability of personnel.
Within rural communities, the management of fisheries for community benefit requires attention to five key areas:
• Maintenance – for example dealing with boat problems especially where they are located in remote areas; or maintaining
boat engines
• Administration – dealing with permit distribution and income as well as club or association costs
• Membership – either declining, or inactive, membership of clubs or associations
• Advice provision – this is often given by a few people who get overburdened with ad hoc advice provision
• Coordination - angling permit income may not be sufficient to support specific appointments and need public support if
community-wide benefits are to be achieved.
It is important to recognise the valuable contribution individuals make to angling provision. Maximising the benefits of angling
for rural communities, however, requires greater attention to be paid to capacity building – such as funding development
and volunteer coordination. Given the benefits that angling tourism can bring to rural areas, it is important that
national and regional policy as well as funding and development agencies recognise the role it can play and
assist communities in building their capacity.
5.4.4 Summary of Recommendations
Development of angling-based tourism to rural areas can increase income to small community groups and generate wider
benefits through visitor expenditure. However, any development needs to complement the ecosystems of the area, local
community interests and the attractions for visiting anglers.
156 Graefe, A. R., J. J. Vaske, and F. R. Kuss. (1984) ‘Social carrying capacity: An integration and synthesis of twenty years of research.’
Leisure Sciences 6: pp395–432
5. Angling and Rural Communities
In relation to angling tourism, and indeed outdoor recreation more broadly, the absence of people is a key driver for visitors.
The ‘social carrying capacity’ of an area refers to the subjective valuation made by participants that includes visibility of
others but also encompasses factors such as the behaviour of others in any given context.156 Maintaining a balance between
increased numbers (that can generate additional income for rural communities) and the subjective experience of
anglers is vital in development of angling tourism.
76
In order to do this, angling clubs, community development agencies and public bodies (including tourism and regional
development) need to:
• Develop the local capacity to monitor angler numbers properly
• Develop ongoing data collection to better understand the visiting angler market, and angling experience
• Explore ways in which social research can be delivered alongside natural sciences
• Involve all stakeholders in the local community in a neutral way
The provision of accurate ‘one-stop’ information utilising web based technology can support local organisations with limited
capacity and should be seen as one way in which public agencies can assist.
Public agencies should help build local resources through part-subsidised posts, training and information dissemination to
help address low capacity such as the overburdening of volunteers. This is particularly important in remote rural areas.
Community land ownership, while not unproblematic, can mean that development of rural angling tourism has more direct
benefits to local organisations and people.
Local angling organisations, business and community groups, local authorities and other public agencies need to work
together to develop good practice in:
• Business clustering
• Development of local festivals and attractions
• Improving provision of information technology
• Angling Passport schemes
77
In Brief
This section describes the positive role that angling can play in education, personal
development and social inclusion of young people. Compared to other positive activities,
angling has a very distinctive offer to make in terms of:
•Providing personal and social development opportunities
•Raising attainment in education and employment
•Diverting young people from crime and antisocial behaviour
6.1 Introduction and Context
In the last twenty years national policy has increasingly focused on positive activities as a means of addressing youth
exclusion.157 The Department of Education’s (DfE) current vision, Positive for Youth,158 has continued with this approach,
outlining how youth services and targeted programmes for disadvantaged or ‘at risk’ groups will be expected to support young
people to:
•Achieve in education and training
•Reduce engagement in crime and risky behaviour
•Access opportunities for personal and social development
•Participate in volunteering programmes.
The riots in the UK in 2011, along with record rates of youth unemployment159, have placed disenfranchised youth firmly in the
spotlight.Questionshavebeenraisedaboutyoungpeople’ssenseofalienationfromsociety,theirmoraldevelopment,andthe
negative public attitudes towards them. New approaches to tackling these issues are needed to ensure all socially excluded
young people are adequately supported. In particular the government is looking to the Voluntary and Community Sector (VCS)
to play a greater role in the provision of sustainable youth services, with the National Citizenship Service in England and
Volunteering Action Plan in Scotland being examples of how this role might be fulfilled.
Our research has found that the UK has become a leader in the field of targeted angling provision for young
people, with a huge expansion of both national and local projects in the last decade.160 This development has coincided
with the emergence of specialist Angling-related Youth Intervention Projects (AYIPs) – organisations that are expert in the
application of angling for working with disadvantaged young people (Figure 2). These specialist projects, alongside more
general angling opportunities for young people by local angling clubs, river trusts and environmental charities, are contributing
to a broad array of high quality service provisions for tackling youth exclusion.
157 See summary of previous policy in Djohari, N. (2009) Angling and Young People Interim Report , Manchester: Substance
http://resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/sites/resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/files/Research_Task_2_Angling_and_Young_People.pdf ;
See also DCSF (2007) Aiming Higher For Young People: A Ten Year Strategy for Positive Activities, London: DCSF
158 Department for Education (2011) Positive for Youth. A new approach to cross-government policy for young people aged 13-19, London:
DfE
159 1.03 million young people (16-24) were unemployed in the 3 months to Oct 2011, the highest since comparable records began in 1992,
although calculations suggest the rate was higher in the mid 1980’s ONS Labour Market Statistics: Dec 2011
160 For a typological breakdown on key provisions and approaches see Djohari (2009) op cit p24.
6. Angling and Young People
6. Angling and Young People
78
Figure 2: The Rapid Expansion of Angling-related Youth Intervention Projects (AYIPs)
Our research is based on extensive fieldwork between May 2009 and Sept 2011 and included in-depth action research with
UK charity Get Hooked On Fishing (GHOF)161, 33 visits to other intervention projects, schools and angling events and over
400 interviews. It also included a survey of 219 young people and data submitted via online comment tools.
6.2 Angling’s Contribution to Tackling Youth Social Exclusion
The UK is a leader in the field of delivering personal and social development outcomes for young people
through angling.
In the past decade, the diversification of angling provision into more targeted youth work has created a distinct sector within
angling with a particular focus on improved social outcomes rather than increasing angling participation.162 The majority of the
work in this sector is carried out by Angling-related Youth Intervention Programmes (AYIPs) that make use of the distinctive
features of angling participation to:
•Provide personal and social development opportunities
•Improve achievement in education and employment
•Divert young people from crime and anti-social behaviour.163
161 http://www.ghof.org.uk/
162 Djohari, N. (2009) op cit, p24
163 It is worth noting, however, that angling clubs and associations, individual coaches, river trust, and environmental charities also provide
some services, particularly coaching for youth offending teams and environmental education courses in schools.
79
Angling has some distinctive attributes that make it a particularly useful tool for young people’s personal and
social development.
We identified five attributes that make angling distinctive as a tool for engaging socially excluded young people as detailed in
Table 6164. AYIPs make use of these distinctive aspects to deliver programmes for young people that focus on: (i) personal
and social development; (ii) diversion from crime and anti-social behaviour; and (iii) attainment in education and employment.
Attribute
Description
Relevance for youth intervention
1. Fascination and
excitement
•Angling is something out of the ordinary.
•There is an instantly gratifying ‘buzz’ from
catching fish.
•Young people often know of relatives
that fish.
•Angling is seen as part of the transition into
adult recreation.
The fascination and excitement of angling
serves as an incentive for participation,
drawing a diverse group of inquisitive young
people into supportive services.
2. Celebrating success
and mitigating failure
•Angling is ‘levelling’- it is possible for a wellcoached novice angler to catch a fish.
•The perceived ‘failure’ of non-catching
can be played down by referring to
environmental variables rather than personal
deficiencies.
•Angling is especially suited to working with
vulnerable young people who have low
self-esteem and avoid activities that have an
emotional risk of failure.
•It is particularly attractive for those who do
not participate in other mainstream sports
and avoid peer competition.
3. Opportunity for mixed
ability participation
•Angling enables mixed participation which
is unusual in mainstream sports provisions.
•Isolation from peers is reduced amongst
young people who are excluded from
participation in other sports or recreation.
•Mixed participation means greater
awareness, integration and toleration
across social divides.
3. ‘In-community’
delivery
•Angling intervention work is not restricted
to segregated environments
•It allows young people to be visible
participants in positive activities at venues
where adults from their community also
attend.
•Young people can make the transition into
adult spaces, learning responsible public
behaviour and having meaningful contact
with the community.
•Members of the community have an
opportunity to observe, speak to and reevaluate young people as positive members
of society.
4. Opportunities to
contribute to society
•Angling creates opportunities to participate
in conservation and community beach/river
clean-up work.
•Volunteering as peer mentors to deliver
angling to other young people and members
of the wider community is a key feature of
AYIP programmes.
•Young people learn self-awareness,
develop understanding of the wider
consequences of negative behaviour and
find opportunities to contribute to society.
•Peer mentoring is personally rewarding,
developing confidence and self-worth, as
well as encouraging empathy.
5. A varied and flexible
tool
•By adapting angling techniques, angling
•Angling consists of a diverse range of
projects can manage public encounters
practices across sea, coarse and game in a
with socially anxious young people; build
wide range of locations.
teamwork; facilitate 1-to-1 developmental
•This makes it distinctly flexible as a tool for
work; build young people’s concentration;
personal and social development; relationship
create new challenges; and inspire
building; and developing interests in learning.
learning in science and the environment.
Table 6: Angling’s Distinctive Attributes for Youth Inclusion Work
164 More detailed explanation is given in Djohari (2009) p15.
6. Angling and Young People
6.2.1 Angling as a Distinctive Tool for Youth Inclusion Work
80
6.2.2 Social Exclusion and Personal and Social Development Opportunities
The best angling programmes take a holistic approach to tackling young people’s exclusion.
‘In school, I would sometimes hang out with the wrong crowd, older boys than me, but now I don’t. If someone asks
me I just say I don’t want to do it. I’ve become more confident and listen to people when they’re trying to help me.
(Interview with Male 15, Inclusion Through Angling project (ITA)
Social exclusion describes a complex process where multiple factors coalesce to prevent young people participating in the
economic, social and political life of society.165 Tackling social exclusion requires a holistic approach that acknowledges
young people will require assistance on multiple fronts in order to re-integrate into society. Such an approach takes into
account the personal capabilities of young people (e.g. underlying physical, mental or emotional difficulties; poor social
development, education attainment); their social situation (e.g. living in care; parent in prison; a young carer); and structural
disadvantages (e.g. living in areas of high deprivation or experiences of discrimination).
The key providers of high quality targeted social exclusion work in angling:
i) Have expertise in working with challenging young people with a variety of complex needs
ii) Are committed to high quality long term provisions
iii) Are specialised in the delivery of personal and social development outcomes.166
iv) Often adopt a business model based around paid contracted work with schools, youth justice services and
local authorities.167
Key providers include: Get Hooked on Fishing (GHOF)168 in England, Scotland and Wales, CAST Angling Project169, and
Angling For Youth Development (AFYD)170.
Key aims and outcomes are best delivered by angling programmes that take a holistic approach to tackling social exclusion,
working on young people’s personal development by encouraging pro-social behaviour through activities such as volunteering.
Key outcomes of this long term engagement approach include:
•Reduced engagement in crime and anti-social behaviour
•Re-engagement with education
•Improved confidence, self-esteem and resilience
•Raised aspirations
•Improved relationships with society
AYIPs work with a diverse range of young people, taking referrals from across education and the youth justice sectors in an
attempt to have a lasting effect on transforming behaviour.
165 Duffy, K (1995) Social Exclusion and Human Dignity in Europe, Council of Europe; Klassen, S. (2000) Social exclusion, Children, and
education: conceptual and measurement issues OECD.
166 See Djohari, N. (2009) op cit., p 36 a for a more detailed explanation.
167 Notable exceptions include Les Webber’s Angling Project (London) and Angling For Youth Development (Scotland), who provide free
services run by volunteers.
168 http://www.ghof.org.uk/
169 http://www.castangling.co.uk/
170 http://www.afyd.co.uk/home.htm
81
The GHOF approach to social exclusion works simultaneously on the multiple barriers to social inclusion. While
GHOF concentrates on transforming behaviour at the level of the individual (developing confidence and self-esteem),
they also provide opportunities to strengthen young people’s close personal relationships, providing positive role
models, family bonding opportunities and introducing young people to new peer groups.171 These supportive
relationships give young people the confidence to develop their social and emotional skills further.
Figure 4: GHOF’s Holistic Approach to Social Inclusion
Through their voluntary peer mentoring scheme, GHOF encourage young people to coach others, in the process
developing empathy and important interpersonal skills.172 Peer mentoring at community events and local schools
provides opportunities for young people to actively contribute to their communities. In turn their positive behaviour
and visibility at these events and local fisheries, encourages the local community to interact with young people and
transform the negative perceptions they have of local youths. This model is effective at tackling youth social exclusion
because it facilitates a sense of belonging as well as equipping young people with the necessary skills to flourish.
6.2.3 Diversion From Crime and Anti-Social Behaviour
The most effective angling diversionary programmes establish exit routes into clubs and wider angling opportunities.
‘By the time I was really starting into fishing I was hanging around with the wrong sort of people. I had two choices, it
was either fishing or go out and start taking drugs. I chose fishing. It’s good to offer angling to young people. It gives
them options.’ (Interview with GHOF peer mentor, 18)
The key providers in this area of work have historically been the police and fire service. One of the most notable is the
annual East Cheshire Emergency Services Fishing Competition which attracted over 900 young people in 2010. More long
term engagement provisions include:
•The police run Bestwood Angling Interest Team (BAIT in Nottingham)173
•Fuzz Fishing Project (Boscombe)
•West Mercia and Humberside police forces working with GHOF.
The Angling Development Board of Scotland (ADBoS) are also developing new work in the Forth and Clyde area in
conjunction with the police working with young people involved in gangs as well as other social inclusion work with Barnardos.
171 See Djohari, N. (2010a) Young People’s Voices Part 1: The Well-being Benefits of Angling Participation, Manchester: Substance, p10;
and Djohari, N. (2011) The Added Value of Angling Intervention programmes Manchester: Substance, p12-13.
172 For more detail see Djohari, N. (2009) op cit: pp37-38; and Djohari, N. (2011).
173 Djohari, N. (2009): op cit p30 for case study. BAIT project website: http://www.bait-project.co.uk/homepage.php
6. Angling and Young People
In Focus: Get Hooked On Fishing’s Holistic Model
82
Local Authorities and housing associations also provide funding or commissions activities from angling clubs and AYIPs
to target ‘hot spot’ areas or provide diversionary activities during the school holidays. Amongst those we visited were King
William IV Angling Society174 in Manchester and Fishing4u in Hastings that delivers angling as part of the council’s Active
Hastings scheme, ‘nesting’ targeted intervention within open access provisions.175
Key aims and outcomes of diversionary approaches are to provide alternative activities for those at risk of engaging in
crime, anti-social behaviour, drug abuse and alcohol abuse.
However, providing temporary diversionary activities alone seldom proves to be a long term solution - the benefits only last as
long as the programme is active. More progressively, we have found that the most effective angling diversionary programmes
establish exit routes into clubs and wider angling opportunities, include personal and social development work to tackle
underlying causes, and seek to rebuild young people’s relationships with society. An example of these good practices can be
found in programmes that seek to strengthen relationships between the young people and the police.
In Focus: Building Relationships Between Young People and the Local Police
West Mercia Police have been working with GHOF Shropshire in Meole Brace (Shrewsbury) since the charity set up
locally in 2008. Meole Brace contains the second most deprived ward in Shropshire, falling within the top 14% most
deprived wards nationally.176 It has high levels of long term unemployment, poor health outcomes, and low levels of
education attainment. When the community policing team and GHOF began working in the area, Meole Brace was
classified as a priority ‘red area’, due to high levels of crime and anti-social behaviour and high fear of crime. Although
deprivation continues to be an existing challenge, Meole Brace was removed from the local police ‘red’ classification
in early 2010. Sergeant Darren Smith stressed that this success is not all down to the angling programmes he leads
with GHOF, but he does believe angling has changed the relationship between young people and the police.
‘We have seen huge reductions in anti-social behaviour, year on year…I think it’s more to do with the relationship
that’s been built than the few hours we keep them employed. The spin-off is they [local young people] all know us
very well and there is not a stigma attached to getting in touch and speaking to the police.’ (Sergeant Smith, West
Mercia)
The 2011 riots have highlighted a need for the police and young people to build stronger relationships and
understanding. As Sergeant Smith explained, angling is particularly well suited to this:
‘Angling gives you time to sit there and chat to young people. We do football sessions, but the difference with
football is that you are there with them for an hour, you’re running around, it’s a good laugh and they enjoy
themselves but there’s very little engagement. Whereas if you’re sat 5 or 6 hours next to some lad, trying to teach
them how to fish, you start talking about all sorts of things…They get to know a little about you, you get to know a
little more about them. A bit of mentoring takes place.’
174
175
176
http://www.heatonpark.org.uk/HeatonPark/Community_Groups/Anglers/
Djohari, N. (2009) op cit 45.
The English Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2007
83
Angling programmes are particularly effective at addressing the need for young people to attain in education
and training.
‘I’ve cut down my drinking a lot now and due to that I’ve done probably 5 or 6 qualifications in sports and fishing. I
wouldn’t have dreamed about it before. Now just from coming on one coaching course it’s made me want to be a coach,
and I’ve been offered a part time job with Sporting Chance.’ (Interview with Male, 17, CAST Nottingham)
Education and training outcomes are particularly important given, at the time of writing:
•Over one million 16-24 year olds are unemployed177
•An estimated 8.5% of 16-18 year olds are not in education, employment or training (NEET) in England.178
•13.7%.179 young people in Scotland are NEET
•The long term public finance costs of current NEET 16-18 year olds is £9.1 billion with resource costs of £16.8 billion.180
Boys from lower income backgrounds in particular are at higher risk of disengagement, with 19% eligible for free school meals
not achieving 5 or more GCSE’s181, and both permanent and fixed term exclusions disproportionately affecting this group in
England and Scotland.182 Angling programmes are particularly effective at providing solutions for re-engaging this cohort by
raising self-esteem, efficacy and aspirations alongside assisting them to meet basic levels of attainment183.
The key players delivering this sort of work are:
•Angling clubs, assisted by the Angling Development Board (ADB) and the Angling Development Board of Scotland
(ADBoS) who are increasingly offering enrichment opportunities by providing extra-curricular sports participation in schools.
•A growing number of schools and colleges, such as Lord Williams School (Oxford),184 Barony College (Dumfries), and
Sparsholt College (Hampshire) who offer vocational courses in fishery or land management.
•AYIPs who dominate the provision of more targeted educational support. Key amongst these are programmes offered by
GHOF, Inclusion Through Angling (ITA)185, CAST North West186, AFYD and Angling4Success187, that combine qualification
attainment with more targeted personal and social development work to support those most disengaged with education.
The key aims and outcomes of angling-related education programmes are:
•Keeping young people motivated and engaged in school
•Increasing education attainment
•Raising aspirations and progression to further education, employment or training
•Intervening early with those at risk of disengagement
•Improving wellbeing and social integration in schools
This is achieved through programmes offered as part of a whole school approach and more targeted early interventions.
Below we outline the four principal provisions:
i) Enrichment and extra-curricular activities
ii) Complimentary learning programmes
iii)Qualiicationattainmentthroughaccreditedcourses
iv) Welfare and additional student support
177 Office of National Statistics (2011) Labour Markets Statistics: Dec 2011, London ONS.
178 This number is significantly down on previous years where it was at 10.4% in 2008. DfE NEETStatistics,Quarter4 2010.
179 The Scottish Government (2011) Local Area Labour Markets 2010
180 Calculated from Audit Commission figures and current number of NEETs. Audit Commission (2010) Estimating the Lifetime Cost of
NEET: 16-18 yr olds not in education, employment or training, London: Audit Commission
181 Dept. for Education (2009) GCSE Attainment by pupil characteristic in England 2008/09, London: DfE
182 Dept. for Education (2010) Permanent and Fixed Period Exclusions from Schools in England 2009/10, London: DfE; Scottish
Government (2011) Exclusion Data Set 2010/11.
183 This is particularly the case because studies show young people who are statistically more likely to fail can quickly become demoralised
by a culture that prioritises academic success through streaming in schools. Perry, E and Francis, R. (2010) The social class gap for
education achievement: a review of the literature, RSA p11
184 Djohari, N. (2009) op cit.
185 http://www.inclusionthroughangling.co.uk/
186 http://www.castnw.co.uk/
187 http://www.energize-solutions.co.uk/angling4success/
6. Angling and Young People
6.2.3 Achievement in Education and Employment
84
i) Enrichment Provisions and Extra-Curricular Activities
Extra-curricular angling programmes run by angling clubs and intervention projects (such as GHOF, Les Webber’s Angling
Project and AFYD), are quality social, cultural and recreational learning opportunities outside of the classroom
that develop students’ personal interests, sense of achievement and self-confidence, making school life enjoyable. The ADB’s
‘school-club link’ programme in particular has led to greater involvement by local angling clubs in the delivery of angling
coaching and taster events in schools, with over 80 school-club events being delivered in 2010.188 In Scotland, 2011 saw the
launch of the first ADBoS ‘Club-Angling’ programme, linking Kinross Fishery with the local Community Sports Hub and
Portmoak Primary school, in order to deliver a children’s coaching programme and assist in the setting up of the first angling
after-school club in the area.
Angling is particularly effective as an extra-curricular, enrichment activity because it provides an opportunity to engage young
people who do not participate or achieve in the traditional school sports or arts offers. As one teacher from Thomas
Adams School (Shropshire) explained, it can be a challenge to find activities for boys who are not interested in sports such
as football. She goes on to explain:
‘Angling is a way really for children who do not excel necessarily academically, do not excel on the sports field, they
don’t fit into those areas in school where they get a lot of praise, it’s where they can actually achieve. But it’s where
any child can achieve, where even the brightest child can achieve, it really is equal for everybody which is why it works
so well.
A key feature of this type of provision is that it is offered as a mixed participation opportunity: it incorporates young people
who need extra incentives, are at risk of disengagement, and who benefit from more experiences of success. Interviews
with young people, teachers and coaches reveal this type of mixed participation approach removes the perceived stigma or
‘unfairness’ often associated with targeted programmes, and encourages young people to benefit from the influence of more
positive peers.
ii) Complementary Learning Programmes
Angling is also used to complement curriculum education by providing novel ways to engage young people in Science,
Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM)189 as well as environmental learning (see Section 3). Key examples
include:
•‘Fishing For Knowledge’, a programme delivered by Borderlines190 across 21 schools in Dumfries and Galloway
in partnership with District Salmon Fisheries Boards and Solway Heritage that introduces young people to their local
environmental heritage.
•Focus on Fishing (FoF)191, which develops interest in STEM subjects through activities built around fishing tackle design
and production using applied physics and maths.
Young people at the education project Inclusion Through Angling (Wales) identified two further features of complementary
angling education courses that encourage curriculum learning:
•Scheduled angling breaks provided an opportunity for mental restoration in between difficult learning sessions
•Coaches provide additional personalised support to understand some of the more complex academic content
As one young person explained:
‘In school I wouldn’t follow instructions; I didn’t use to listen as much as I do now. Now I’m much more focused…I can
sit in the class room [at the angling centre] and they go through it step by step and they don’t rush you on. You go at it in
your own pace in the whole class room.’ (Interview, Male 15, ITA)
188 Angling Development Board (2011) Talent Development Plan for Angling 2011-2015, Nottingham: ADB
189 The Wolf Report has raised particular concern that young people are not developing interest in STEM subjects. Dept of Education
(2011) Review of Vocational Education. The Wolf Report, London: DFE 00031-2011, p76
190 http://www.borderlines.org.uk/Fishing%20for%20Knowledge.html
191 http://www.fofacademy.co.uk/
85
Overrecentyearsnumerousaccreditedcourseshaveemergedinangling-relatedsubjects.TheseincludeGHOF’sAQA
fishing modules, the OCN Introduction to Angling and the Environment, NACRO’s Reading Angling Project’s E2E pilot192,
AFYD’s Game Angling course193, BTEC’s in fishery management, land based industries, and the BTEC in Game Angling
currently being developed by The Game Angling Instructors Association (GAIA), as well as numerous angling-related ASDAN
and Foundation Learning courses.194
Our observational visits and interviews with staff and young people suggest the importance of these courses is in developing
the soft skills needed to go into the workplace and encouraging confidence, self-belief and renewed interest in formal
learning, rather than in their GCSE equivalency credits. The exceptions to this, in terms of substantive qualification attainment,
are the BTECs (see In Focus feature).
The establishment of the Sports Leaders Award in angling (ages 14-16) and the progress of young people into Levels 1
and 2 UKCC Coaching qualifications also provide additional attainment opportunities. Our interviews with young people
found that although they were disengaged with education they often had a desire to complete further education or training, for
example in youth work and community sports provisions. In GHOF Liverpool in particular, the professional development of
these young people was encouraged further through access to volunteering opportunities and work related courses such as
first aid and child protection.
‘I’m looking into sports coaching or youth work now. Since I’ve been with GHOF, being a youth worker and seeing what
goes on, it looks interesting...I’ve been on a few courses, equality and diversity, child protection and I’ve done my first
aid. So gradually I’m getting to know it and my confidence is growing.’ (Male 18, GHOF)
However the diversity, and varying quality, of angling related courses and qualifications suggests a need for some
rationalisation and quality control by angling’s governing bodies. This will help to improve and clarify current provision for both
angling organisations seeking to deliver programmes and the education sectors wishing to commission them.
One example of good practice is a new partnership between ADBoS and Barony College, in a development funded by
MarineScotland.ThiscreatedanSQAapprovedprogressionawardforangling,whichschoolswillbeabletodeliver,creating
approved education pathways in natural sciences, fish husbandry, fishery management and other angling related areas.
In Focus: BTECs and employment in the land based industries
BTECs are substantive, specialist work-related qualifications through which young people gain employer-recognised
qualifications. Schools and AYIPs are beginning to offer angling-related BTEC courses (in fishery management and
land based industries) as supplementary options at Key stage 4 (14+)195, particularly (but not exclusively) amongst
those at risk of disengagement. When taken alongside core GCSEs in Maths and English, these BTECs offer clear
progression pathways into BTEC courses in further education and strengthen the feeder system into land-based
industries. We found students engaged in angling related courses, particularly the BTECs, expressed a desire
to move into broader land based industries including conservation, aquaculture, game and wildlife management,
horticulture, and fishery management.196
Projected estimates suggest the land based industries will need to recruit a further 232,000 employees across
England, Scotland and Wales within the next 10 years, with a particular emphasis on recruiting more young
people.197 Consequently, angling-related BTEC courses represent a viable route into further education, training and
employment, particularly amongst young people who may need encouragement and the incentive of personal interest
to raise their confidence and aspirations.
192 http://www.nacro.org.uk/services/thames-valley/nacro-reading-angling-project/
193CreditratedagainsttheScottishCourseQualiicationsFramework.
194 See Djohari, N. (2009) op cit p 33 for more detailed examples.
195 We visited three separate BTEC courses provided by GHOF Shropshire with Tudor Grange Academy (Worcester), GHOF Easington
with Easington Community Science College (County Durham); and Lord William’s School (Oxford).
196 Based on interviews with young people on BTEC courses as well as those engaged in wider education programmes run by GHOF,
CAST, and Inclusion Through Angling.
197 Lantra. Land Based and Environmental Industries. Fact sheet, 2010-2011 for England, Scotland and Wales: http://www.lantra.co.uk/
Factsheets.aspx
6. Angling and Young People
iii) Qualification Attainment through Accredited Courses
86
iv) Welfare and Additional Student Support
Angling is particularly suited to helping young people with additional welfare needs and behavioural or learning difficulties,
especially ADHD.
Young people suffering behavioural or learning difficulties, experiencing bullying, or bereavement, who have difficult family
circumstances, low attendance, or are experiencing difficulties making friends, can benefit from the additional personal
support provided by dedicated angling programmes.198 Angling also appears to have a very particular benefit for young people
with hyperkinetic disorders, such as ADHD.199
Interviews with teachers, parents and young people correspond with findings from our observational data that showed with
repeat angling sessions young people (both with and without ADHD) were able to hold concentration – despite distraction
– for longer periods of time200. Angling techniques combine prolonged focused attention with the instantly gratifying reward
of catching a fish. When allied with the beneficial tranquil setting of green environments201, angling appears to be effective in
assisting young people to strengthen their ability to concentrate and control impulsive behaviour. Experienced young anglers
eventually find less effort is required to maintain attention and angling subsequently becomes relaxing.202
‘Once they get that bug, I think it’s a combination of things, the environment they’re in, other like-minded people,
common interest. He’s in control of what he’s doing, and there’s a routine to things, which for kids with any sort of
cognitive issue, it seems to work. It’s also short bursts of concentration followed by a reward. It’s not landing fish all day,
it’s the peace that goes along with it. It’s repetitive. It’s a structure.’ (Mother of young angler with ADHD)
198 See Djohari, N. (2011) op cit;
199 See Djohari, N. (2011) op cit; and Djohari, N (2010) op cit.
200 Concentration requires both selective attention (ability to focus on stimuli while suppressing distractions) and sustained attention (ability
to maintain attention over a period of time). Brickenkamp,R and Zillmer, E. (1998) d2 Test of Attention. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe
and Huber.
201 Newton, J (2007: 28) Wellbeing and the Natural Environment. A brief overview of the evidence. http://www3.surrey.ac.uk/resolve/
seminars/Julie%20Newton%20Paper.pdf; Taylor, A.F., Kuo, F.E. & Sullivan, W.C. (2001) ‘Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to
green play settings’ in Environment and Behaviour, 33(1), 54-77
202 This experience echoes studies on ‘focused attention’ meditation that suggest improving attention can be the product of trainable
skill. Lutz, A; Slagner, H, Dunne,J; and Davidson, R. (2008). ‘Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation’ Trends in Cognitive
Sciences Vol 12 (4); Maclean et al. (2010). Intensive Meditation training Improves Perceptual Discrimination and sustained attention. In
Psychological Science, Vol 21 (6): p829-839.
87
As a pilot to determine the possibility of measuring angling’s impact on attention and focus we used the d2 test of
attention203 to measure before and after changes in 5 young people aged 14-15. The d2 test of attention measures
both selective and sustained attention
The pre-test baseline was established one week prior to the angling session at the same venue. The results showed a
dramatic increase for all 5 participants in both attention and inhibitory control (TN-E) and overall speed and accuracy
of concentration performance (CP) following an angling session.
Pre-test
Post-test
500
Test Score
500
300
200
100
0
A
B
C
D
E
Young Person
Chart 8: Pre- and Post-Test Scores for TN-E
Pre-test
Post-test
Test Score
200
150
100
50
0
A
B
C
D
E
Young Person
Chart 9: Pre- and Post-Test Scores for CP
The small sample size means these results are not conclusive in themselves, but they do demonstrate the potentially
significant impact angling has on improving young people’s concentration and focus. Measurement of the effect
within a controlled trial would give further quantitative weight to the qualitative findings from interviews with teachers,
parents and professionals working with young people with hyperkinetic disorders. We recommend future studies
focus on this particular aspect of angling and how improvement to attention may be beneficial for young people
with ADHD.
203 Brickenkamp, R and Zillmer, E. 1998. d2 Test of Attention. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe and Huber. This is principally a visual
cancellation test that has been used in both research and applied setting, including with young people with ADHD
6. Angling and Young People
In Focus: Getting the Measure of Attention in Angling
88
6.3 Issues and Recommendations
6.3.1 Youth Inclusion Work and Angling
The provision of angling projects targeting personal development outcomes (AYIPs) has seen rapid growth within the last
decade and represents the evolution of good practice in angling’s work with young people. However, more needs to be done
to raise the representation and knowledge of this exceptional work.
There is a need for raising awareness of the distinct offer angling can make to some of the most socially excluded young
people within our society, across the angling sector and beyond. The interim reports produced as part of the Social and
Community Benefits of Angling research project and the accompanying Angling Research Resources website
(www.resources.anglingresearch.org.uk) have attempted to address some of this deficit. However, angling governing bodies
need to work more closely with AYIP organisations and help advocate their work at the highest levels. The merger of the ADB
and Angling Trust in England, and the expanding work of ADBoS and GHOF Scotland, represent a timely opportunity for
this to happen.
In particular angling governing and development bodies should support angling’s contribution to tackling social
exclusion in the following ways:
i) Provide greater clarity and guidance on key differences and expected standards of delivery. Currently the Sport England
‘club mark’ classification is used to recognise high quality sports provision. Angling governing bodies should look to develop
a similar guidance system for educational and personal and social development programmes.
ii) Angling governing bodies should actively promote the work of angling organisations engaged in tackling social exclusion.
This can include:
•Assisting angling projects to establish links with education, youth justice, and wider youth services and charities
outside of angling, at local, regional and national level.
•Providing centralised, online information explaining the work of AYIPs and contact details of projects to assist those
seeking this type of service in their area.
•Help develop shared approaches to monitoring and evaluation, reporting and best practice guidance, using the
framework provided in Table 8 below.
89
The distinctive and innovative offer that angling has developed in the UK in relation to personal development work with
excluded young people needs wider recognition. One way that this could be achieved is through the creation of a network of
providers – possibly under the ADB and ADBoS – in order to help share good practice and key learning, particularly in the
development of education courses, which would also help to avoid duplication and unnecessary competition.
In England the establishment of ADB regional officers and County Angling Action Groups (CAAGs)204 has begun to address
some of the needed coordination and support of localised work. However, greater incorporation of AYIPs in particular is
needed to rebalance a focus that has traditionally centred on sports development. In particular there is a need to further
support angling’s educational work in the following ways.
i) Schools do not always have the necessary in-house expertise to offer high quality BTECs.205 Working with education
providers, the angling sector can support schools wishing to incorporate angling-related BTEC programmes by:
•Encouraging BTEC delivery by AYIPs with relevant expertise
•Provide high quality materials to complement BTEC components
•Facilitate partnering between schools and the fishery sectors
•Build on and share good practice developed by BTEC providers at the school level.
ii) The immense range of angling courses on offer can lead to confusion over what provisions mean in relation to content
and qualification attainment. A review is urgently needed of angling-related education courses, to provide a more unified
understanding within angling and clearer guidance for schools and education providers, parents and young people. The
review should focus on clarifying:
•The central purpose of courses (e.g. personal development or vocational training)
•The substantive value of accreditations achieved
•Potential routes for progression
•Content, subject level and methods of assessment
•The recommended level of staff expertise required to teach the course
204 http://www.anglingresearch.org.uk/node/236
205 Dept of Education (2011) Review of Vocational Education-The Wolf Report, London: DfE :95
6. Angling and Young People
6.3.2 Networking for Wider Recognition
90
6.3.3 Evaluating and Reporting
Across the sector, more needs to be done to effectively monitor, evaluate and report the outcomes achieved by disadvantaged
young people from participation in angling. Only a more rigorous outcomes-based approach, supported by evidence collected
from diligent monitoring, will support its ongoing development and wider recognition. This should follow the criteria of
successful projects provided in Table 8.
Essential
Desirable
Aims and objectives
Clarity of purpose with clearly
defined aims and objectives,
long term engagement and exit
routes.
Evidence of the link between
Provision of volunteering
opportunities and accredited programme type and
subsequent outcomes.
outcomes.
Staff
Knowledge of angling and
ability to work with challenging
young people. Opportunities
for professional development
and on- going training of staff.
Staff of mixed age
ranges will encourage
further intergenerational
engagement.
Staff of mixed gender
and ethnicity can unlock
participation amongst a
wider range of groups and
serve as important role
models.
Organisational
structure
Professional organisations
meeting all child protection
policies, with clear plans for
sustainability
Steering groups
incorporating key people
from the community and
young people.
Explore different
organisational structures
(e.g. mutuals and social
enterprises).
Evidence (Monitoring
and Evaluation)
Consistent monitoring and
evaluation that includes
number of participants as well
as hard outcomes achieved
(such as qualifications).
Soft outcomes and long
term progress- such as exit
routes. (e.g employment/
education)
High quality evidence of
programme success from
before-after trials/studies of
specific interventions.
Organisational
relationships
Working relationships with
local police, schools and
local authorities incorporating
referral and information sharing
systems.
Embedded within community
networks that include youth
services, police, education,
and CAF panels.
Partnerships in delivery,
training and knowledge
exchange with practitioners
across youth services.
Young people’s
engagement
Opportunities for young
people’s feedback to shape
delivery.
Young people involved
in decision making and
steering groups.
Young people developing
and running programmes.
Table 8: Criteria for Assessing Angling Based Youth Intervention Services
Good to have
91
The Social and Community Benefits of Angling research has generated a huge amount of evidence about the positive
roles that anglers and angling can play in people’s lives.
In doing so, and in line with the aims of the research funding, we have also sought to make recommendations about how
these benefits can be increased and how practice and policy can be developed to support that.
The merger of the Angling Trust and Angling Development Board in England and Wales and its development of a National
Angling Participation Action Plan (NAPAP) along with the expanding and diversifying work of the Angling Development Board
of Scotland demonstrate that angling has significantly improved its governance and delivery in recent years.
In part this process has been informed by a greater understanding of the social benefits that angling can deliver, something
this research has sought to support.
This research provides a framework for the ongoing development of angling and its social and community benefits in six
outcome areas:
1. Sports Participation
2. Health and Well-being
3. The Natural Environment
4. Community Development
5. Rural Communities and Tourism
6. Young People
In this final section we provide a summary of key recommendations in those areas.
Summary of Recommendations
1. Participation
There needs to be more appropriate ways of determining participation levels in angling that reflect the particularities of
the activity (duration, frequency) along with appropriate levels of sport development funding to match.
Sports councils and funding agencies need to have a more nuanced and sophisticated measurement of physical
activity as it relates to angling in order to account for the huge variation in activity levels across diverse angling practices. This
needs to reflect how angling activity is relative to physical ability, and as a result contributes to getting people of all ages and
abilities more physically active.
Angling participation needs to be better understood, beyond that generated by a rigid sport development framework, in order
to embrace the multi-faceted range of (beneficial) activities that extend beyond the act of catching fish itself.
Angling governing bodies, national and local policymakers need to work to overcome the barriers to angling
participation. This is particularly so in relation to overcoming cost barriers for young people.
Concluding Comments and Summary Recommendations
Concluding Comments
and Summary
Recommendations
92
2. Health and Well-Being
Angling governing bodies and development agencies need to work with fishery owners, environmental agencies and local
authorities to develop facilities that are accessible so that people of all abilities and ages can access the health and wellbeing benefit of angling participation. This should include access to centralised fisheries near to population centres.
The health departments of UK and devolved governments need to work with angling governing bodies to understand the
unique health and well-being benefits angling can bring.
Angling governing bodies and regional and local organisations should champion the health and well-being benefits
of angling more effectively and lead an approach to health policymakers and professionals. This should include work with
national mental and physical health charities and agencies such as Mind and the Stroke Association.
Regional and county based angling managers should develop networks involving angling clubs and charities along with
locally based health agencies and local authorities.
There is a need to develop more robust health based research, particularly around the mental health benefits of angling.
3. Natural Environment
Angling organisations need to coordinate and further develop approaches that involve anglers in environmental
education, improvement, monitoring and access. This could include extending the work of rivers trusts and the development of
a database of projects delivering this sort of work
This needs to be supported by better evaluation, reporting and publicising of the outcomes of angling’s contribution
in this area.
New institutional relationships offer some exciting new opportunities for both environmental protection agencies and
angling. This is particularly so in England where the role of the Environment Agency in relation to angling promotion and
regulation is changing.
The NAPAP (in England and Wales) and the angling governing bodies in Scotland need to make links between the work of
environmentally orientated angling-related bodies (Rivers Trusts, Wild Trout Trust etc.) and projects focused on education
and young people.
There is a need for a closer, more co-operative and transparent relationship between marine protection agencies and sea
angling organisations.
4. Communities
New national and local policy relationships brought about as part of the ‘big society’ agenda offer distinct opportunities for
angling to develop its work within local communities.
In particular this includes opportunities for angling clubs and projects to develop their role in developing, owning and
managing local waters.
At a national level angling governing bodies should work with organisations such as the Local Government Association,
Locality and government departments to promote the beneficial role that angling can play in local communities,
highlighting good practice that this research has described.
Local authorities need to work with angling organisations in their areas in order that the significant health, environmental and
community benefits of properly managed and run local waters and coasts can be realised.
In order to take advantage of new opportunities in relation to localism and the changing role of local authorities, there is a
need for angling bodies to work with national third sector agencies such as Coops UK, Social Enterprise Network
and the Charities Evaluation Service to provide advice, training and guidance to local angling organisations about appropriate
charitable, co-operative and social enterprise business models.
National and regional programmes of angling volunteering should be developed building on the extensive volunteering
that already takes place, with a particular focus on delivering benefits for both young people and older age groups.
93
National tourism agencies in the UK should work with angling governing bodies to promote and develop the benefits of
angling based tourism, with a particular focus on rural areas.
There is a need to work with regional development agencies and local authorities to promote angling tourism in order
that the significant economic benefits of angling tourism can be more widely felt.
This work should include:
•Development of information technology to support angling tourism
•Business clustering
•Development of local festivals and attractions
•Angling passport schemes
Angling tourism development should be undertaken in conjunction with sustainable management systems to encourage
balanced, broad-based but community-focused economic growth. To support this there is a need to:
•Develop local capacity to monitor angler numbers and feedback properly
•Develop ongoing data collection to better understand the visiting angler market, and angler experience
•Explore ways in which social research can be delivered alongside natural sciences
•Involve all stakeholders in the local community
6. Young People
Angling needs to promote the excellent work of angling based youth inclusion projects (AYIPs) in which the UK
is a leader in the field.
This should include:
•Providing centralised, online information explaining the work of AYIPs and contact details of projects to assist those
seeking this type of service in their area.
•Assisting angling projects to establish links with education, youth justice, and wider youth services and charities
outside of angling, at local, regional and national level.
•Development of consistent approaches to monitoring and evaluation, reporting and best practice guidance with
greater clarity and guidance on key differences and expected standards of delivery.
Education policymakers and practitioners need to work with angling to coordinate and develop a more coherent offer in terms
of angling-related educational qualifications and attainment.
Demonstrating Outcomes
This project has provided a wealth of evidence about the positive role that angling can play in social and community
development. If angling is to realise its potential in the six outcome areas outlined then it needs to convince non-angling
policymakers and practitioners on an ongoing basis about its delivery and impact.
This will require an agreed, more unified and robust research, monitoring and evaluation framework and the tools to undertake
that task. The research that this project has delivered provides a firm basis on which such a framework can be implemented
and Substance will work with the angling governing bodies and their partners to develop and implement it.
Concluding Comments and Summary Recommendations
5. Rural Communities
94
Authored by Adam Brown, Natalie Djohari and Paul Stolk
Published by:
Substance
3rd Floor Fourways House
Hilton St
Manchester M1 2EJ
www.substance.coop
All rights reserved.
Designed by Because Studio – www.becausestudio.co.uk
ISBN number: 978-1-906455-02-6