International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health
Verma P et al. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2021 Jul;8(7):3300-3304
http://www.ijcmph.com
Original Research Article
pISSN 2394-6032 | eISSN 2394-6040
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20212353
Prevalence of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis and factors associated
with treatment outcome in three districts of Himachal Pradesh, India
Pushpinder Verma1, Balbir Singh2*, Pramod K. Shridhar2, Gurmeet Singh1,
Sukhjinder Pal Singh2, Parth Rajdev2
1
Department of Community Medicine, 2Department of Respiratory Medicine, MMMC and H, Kumarhatti, Solan,
Himachal Pradesh, India
Received: 10 May 2021
Revised: 06 June 2021
Accepted: 11 June 2021
*Correspondence:
Dr. Balbir Singh,
E-mail: bsbhatoe@yahoo.com
Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under
the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the world and especially in India.
MDR TB has emerged as a major challenge in TB control in India. The prevalence of MDR TB is on the rise in India.
We did this study to see the prevalence of MDR TB in 3 districts of Himachal Pradesh and to study the factors
affecting treatment outcomes.
Methods: The period of the study was from January 2019 to December 2019. We collected data of MDR TB patients
from district TB offices of Solan, Bilaspur and Hamirpur. Information from patients was collected through
questionnaires while interviews were conducted with district project officer and other health officials and documents,
brochures, etc. were collected from Solan, Hamirpur and Bilaspur.
Results: Overall prevalence rate of MDR TB in our study was 3.14%. Among new TB cases, the prevalence rate of
MDR TB was 2.42% (81/3345), and among old treated cases was 9% (37/411). 31% MDR TB patients were old
treated while 69% patients had no previous treatment history. The default rate was low in our study (0.84%) while 8
(6.4%) patients had treatment interruption but for less than 15 days.
Conclusions: The prevalence in our study is comparable to the national drug resistance survey. Early detection,
timely treatment and contact tracing is vital in decreasing the MDR TB cases. Better supervision, constant
monitoring, proper counselling and timely identification and management of adverse effects of the drugs will improve
the treatment outcome among MDR TB patients.
Keywords: Multidrug resistant TB, Himachal Pradesh, Prevalence
INTRODUCTION
Tuberculosis (TB) is known to mankind since its
inception. TB is among the top 10 causes of death
because of a single infectious agent all over the world in
adults.1 The infectious agent was discovered and
described by the eminent German scientist Robert Koch
on 24th March, 1882. World health organization (WHO)
in the year 1993 took an unprecedented step and declared
TB to be a global emergency. 2 One million children (0-14
years of age) fell ill with TB, and 230 000 children
(including children with HIV associated TB) died from
the disease in 2017. 1 According to TB India report 2018,
in Himachal Pradesh there were 15715 notified patients
of TB and 1400 deaths were reported in 2017.3
Multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) is form of active TB
when the causative bacteria is found resistant to first line
anti TB drugs i.e., Rifampicin and Isoniazid. Multidrugresistant TB (MDR-TB) is emerging as a big health
hazard and major public health crisis in the recent years.
As per WHO reports there were 6 lacs in 2016, 5.58 lacs
International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health | July 2021 | Vol 8 | Issue 7
Page 3300
Verma P et al. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2021 Jul;8(7):3300-3304
in 2017 and 4.84 lacs in 2018 new Rifampicin resistant
TB cases which is the major first-line anti TB drug; out of
this 78% to 82% patients had MDR TB all over the
globe.1
TB is killing more people in India than any other
infectious disease. In India, every day approximately 2
deaths every 5 minutes (600 per day) are occurring and
more than 6000 are developing TB disease. India is
among the highest burden countries of both TB and MDR
TB. A national drug resistance survey (NDRS) was
conducted in India from 2014 to 2016, which showed the
real burden of DRTB cases. According to this survey,
2.84% patients were MDR TB cases among the newly
diagnosed TB patients, and 11.62% were MDR TB
patients from the previously treated TB cases. So overall,
6.19% patients from all the diagnosed TB patients were
MDR TB cases.4
districts. The patient data was collected using a standard
2-part questionnaire that was filled by the patient. The
questionnaire consisted of part A for collection of the
demographic and socio-economic status of the MDR TB
patients and part B for collection of information about the
contributing factors to MDR TB and factors that may
affect treatment outcome.
Treatment regimen
All the patients included in the study were started on
standard shorter regimen (9-11 months) for MDR TB as
prescribed under government of India’s guidelines for
programmatic management of drug resistant TB (PMDT
2019) in India.
Treatment outcome
As MDR TB is emerging as such a big challenge in our
fight to eliminate TB from India, we decided to do this
study to see the prevalence of MDT TB in our region and
to study the different aspects associated with its treatment
in districts of Solan, Hamirpur and Bilaspur of Himachal
Pradesh.
The outcome of the treatment was assigned by the
treatment supporter at the end of the MDR TB treatment
as per the PMDT guidelines. Treatment completed is
defined as a patient who has completed treatment
according to guidelines but does not meet the definition
for cure or treatment failure due to lack of
microbiological results.
METHODS
Statistical tools
We did this study of one-year duration in three major
districts of Himachal Pradesh; Solan, Hamirpur and
Bilaspur. The period of the study was from January 2019
to December 2019. The main objectives were to find out
the prevalence of MDR TB, to study outcomes of
different treatment regimens and any factors associated
with treatment outcome.
The values are summarized using averages, percentages,
frequencies.
Sample size
The population used for the present study was all the TB
cases diagnosed (n=3756) from January 2019 to
December 2019 in Districts Solan, Hamirpur and Bilaspur
of Himachal Pradesh. Out of 3756 TB patients, 118 were
diagnosed as MDR TB cases. Therefore 118 MDR TB
cases consisted of sample size. Inclusion criteria of the
study consisted of the presence of resistance to both
Rifampicin and Isoniazid in a patient’s sample by
molecular diagnostic method or by culture and DST. We
excluded cases of extensively drug resistant (XDR) TB
from our study.
The above data was collected from DTOs of the 3
districts. The primary data was collected through pilot
survey, personal interviews, questionnaires filled up by
118 confirmed MDR TB patients of Solan, Hamirpur and
Bilaspur districts and personal observations.
The documents confirming the MDR diagnosis, treatment
regimens and treatment outcome of the patients were
collected from the MDR TB registers and by interviews
with the DTO/DPO/health officials of the respective
RESULTS
Total TB cases registered during 2019 in Solan, Hamirpur
and Bilaspur districts during the year 2019 were 3756
including pulmonary as well as extrapulmonary cases.
Solan is leading with the total no. of 1947 TB patients
with 743 extrapulmonary cases and 1204 cases of
pulmonary TB. Bilaspur had a burden of 928 TB patients
with 653 pulmonary and 275 extrapulmonary cases
during year 2019. Hamirpur had 881 TB cases with 594
PTB and 287 EPTB cases (Table 1).
Table 1: Total TB case notification for year 2019 in
Solan, Hamirpur and Bilaspur districts.
Name of
district
Solan
Hamirpur
Bilaspur
Total
Pulmonary
TB
patients
1204
594
653
2451
Extrapulmonary
TB patients
743
287
275
1305
Total
TB
patients
1947
881
928
3756
The study showed that a very few patients were under the
age of 16 years and comprised merely 6% of the cohort.
Most patients were from age group 26-35 years and above
56-year group with 27 (22.8.%) patients from each group.
Among sex wise distribution, males were predominant
International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health | July 2021 | Vol 8 | Issue 7
Page 3301
Verma P et al. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2021 Jul;8(7):3300-3304
with 70.3% (83) and females were 29.7% (35) with male
to female ratio of 2.3 (Table 2).
Table 2: Age and sex wise distribution of MDR TB
cases.
Variables
Age (Years)
Less than 16
16-25
26-35
36-45
46-55
Above 55
Sex
Male
Female
Total patients,
(n=118)
Percentage
(%)
7
22
27
18
17
27
5.9
19.5
22.8
15.2
14.4
22.8
83
35
70.3
29.7
Total MDR TB cases in Solan, Bilaspur and Hamirpur
districts from 1st January, 2019 to 31st December, 2019
were 118. Out of which 21 are still on treatment. The 86
patients have completed their treatment and 9 patients
died during the treatment. One patient has defaulted
treatment and one patient has been switched to XDR
treatment. Death rate in our study was 5%, and default
rate was 0.84% during the study period as shown in the
Table 3.
Overall prevalence rate of MDR TB in our study was
3.14%. Among new TB cases, the prevalence rate of
MDR TB was 2.42% (81/3345), and among old treated
cases was 9% (37/411). 98.3% (116/118) of the MDR TB
cases were pulmonary and 1.7% were extrapulmonary
TB. So, the overall prevalence of MDR TB among
pulmonary TB cases was 4.73% and among EPTB cases
was 0.15% (Table 4).
Table 3: Status of treatment outcome of MDR TB cases in Solan, Hamirpur and Bilaspur.
Name of
district
Solan
Hamirpur
Bilaspur
Total
Total MDR
patients
63
33
22
118
On treatment
12
5
4
21
Completed
treatment
47
26
13
86
Died
Default
4
1
4
9
0
0
1
1
Switched to
XDR
0
1
0
1
*Source: Data collected from DTO’S of Solan, Bilaspur and Hamirpur (HP).
Table 4: Prevalence of MDR TB among new and old
treated TB cases.
Case definition
New
Old treated
Total
PTB
EPTB
Prevalence of
MDR TB
81/3345
37/411
118/3756
116/2451
2/1305
Percentage (%)
2.42
9
3.14
4.73
0.15
Among the MDR TB patients 37 (31%) had previous
history of anti TB treatment or treatment default, but a
majority of MDR TB patients 81(69%) had no prior TB
treatment history.
Our study showed that most of the patients were aware of
the disease and were regularly taking treatment. The 110
(93.2%) patients were taking their medicine regularly
whereas only 8 (6.8%) missed their treatment doses. Main
reason given by them for irregular treatment was
carelessness, depressive state of mind. Among other
factors for missed doses were side effects of drugs, pill
burden and long duration of the treatment. Most of the
patients resumed their treatment within 15 days after the
intervention of healthcare providers. Poor monetary
condition is not one of the factors because the treatment is
available free of cost in all the government hospitals.
Once the treatment started all the patients were taking
only allopathic treatment. None of the patient was taking
alternative form of medicine
homeopathic treatment.
like
ayurvedic
or
A number of patients had experienced side effects during
the treatment. There were 54 (45.7%) patients who had
one, two or more than two side effects. Most of the
patients had experienced gastrointestinal side effects, loss
of appetite and drowsiness. 32.1% of the patients had
gastrointestinal symptoms, 7.4% of the patients reported
having a ringing sensation in the ear, 1.2% reported
deafness, 9.9% had skin problems and 7.4% had
experienced many other kinds of side effects too. A very
few patients 2 (1.6%) who had already completed their
treatment complained of having persistent breathlessness
and weakness even after completion of treatment.
DISCUSSION
Tuberculosis has been a part of human experience for a
long time and now with the increasing trends of MDR
TB, it is becoming even more difficult to treat. Factors
that commonly play a role in spreading MDR TB are
socio-demographic, socio-economic, health seeking
behavior, exposure to TB patients, previous TB treatment
and other comorbid conditions. The present study was
undertaken to find prevalence and treatment outcome of
MDR TB in three districts (Solan, Hamirpur and
Bilaspur) of Himachal Pradesh. The study included all the
diagnosed MDR TB patients among TB patients from 1st
January 2019 to 31st December 2019.
International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health | July 2021 | Vol 8 | Issue 7
Page 3302
Verma P et al. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2021 Jul;8(7):3300-3304
The socio-demographic profile of our study population
revealed that 57% MDR TB patients were between age
group 16 years to 45 years. Similar pattern of age
distribution was observed by Mehari et al in their study
where approximately 64% MDR TB patients were
between age of 15 to 44 years.5 In our study we observed
that out of 118 MDR TB patients during 2019, there were
35 females (29.7%) and 83 (70.3%) were male patients.
Similar observation was made by Sinha et al in their
study.6
Overall prevalence of MDR TB in our study was 118 in
3756 newly diagnosed TB cases, which is 3.64%. Among
new TB cases, the prevalence rate of MDR TB was
2.42%, and among old treated cases was 9% in our study.
According to Sharma et al, the prevalence of MDR TB
among 177 cases of newly diagnosed pulmonary TB
patients in New Delhi in 2008-2009 was lower at 1.1
percent.7 In a recent study by Lohiya et al the prevalence
of MDR TB was 3.5%, among new and 26.7% among
previously treated cases respectively which is higher than
our study.8
Previous TB treatment factor was significantly correlated
with MDR TB. In this study, the patients who had
previously completed treatment or received anti-TB drugs
for more than or equivalent to one month, were classified
as previously treated. In our research, we had 31%
patients among MDR TB patients, who were previously
treated for the TB. Exactly the similar conclusions were
given by Rifat et al in their study, they found previous TB
treatment as one of the most common independent risk
factors in the community spread of MDR-TB.9 During
their research, 29.3% of MDR TB patients had the history
of previous TB treatment. Major factors of previous
treatment default were relief from major symptoms (fever
and weight loss), drug reactions or allergies to drugs.
Stosic et al observed that most of the MDR-TB patients
significantly reported previous TB treatment history
(OR=2.65; 95% CI = 1.14-6.16) and default from
treatment (OR=3.84; 95% CI=1.41-11.11) than controls,
which is quite similar to our observations.10
We observed in our research that primary MDR TB
patients were more than the secondary MDR TB patients.
There were 69% MDR TB patients out of total 118
patients who had no previous history of TB. These
interpretations were same as made by Royce et al in their
study where anti-TB drug resistance surveillance data
from 30 countries estimated to have more than 700
notified multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) cases.11 Out
of this new TB patients comprised a median of 54% of
the total MDR-TB cases. They observed that new MDR
TB cases number was in increasing trends, which was
clear signal of escalated community spread of MDR TB
infection. Ershova et al observed in their research that out
of 60 MDR-TB patients 44 patients were newly
diagnosed patients with no previous history of taking
anti-TB drugs, which was near about 73 percent of the
cohort.12 This is a clear-cut sign of escalating trends of
primary acquired MDR-TB in the community, which is
alarming for policy makers.
Only 1 patient in our study defaulted from the treatment
and the main factors in that case were the constant side
effects, depressive state of mind and the long duration of
the treatment.
Limitations
There are a lot of variables that we could not include in
our study like the information about the tobacco and
alcohol abuse, ease of approach to healthcare facility,
XDR TB cases and polydrug resistance cases which are
also important in understanding the true extent of the drug
resistance TB and associated factors. Further research is
also required to see the factors associated with increasing
primary drug resistance cases.
CONCLUSION
We found in our study that male sex, lower literacy level,
larger family size, poor socio-economic status were the
factors associated with prevalence of MDR TB.
Surprisingly, most of our patients did not have any
previous TB history. We found that the factors associated
with poor treatment outcome are the persistent side
effects, longer duration of treatment and large pill burden
along with carelessness of the patients.
In conclusion, in this study the prevalence is comparable
to the National drug resistance survey conducted in India
during 2014-2016. Early detection, timely treatment and
contact tracing is vital in decreasing the MDR TB cases.
Better supervision, constant monitoring, proper
counselling and timely identification and management of
adverse effects of the drugs will improve the treatment
outcome among MDR TB patients and will reduce noncompliance in patients.
Funding: No funding sources
Conflict of interest: None declared
Ethical approval: The study was approved by the
Institutional
Ethics
Committee
letter
noMMMCH/IEC/19/228
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis
report; 2018. Available at: https://apps.who.
int/iris/handle/10665/274453. Accessed on 1 Jan
2021.
World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis
Programme. TB: A global emergency, WHO report
on the TB epidemic. 1994. Available at:
https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/58749.
Accessed on 1 Jan 2021.
Central TB Division. TB India 2018. India:
Directorate General of Health Services MoHFW.
International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health | July 2021 | Vol 8 | Issue 7
Page 3303
Verma P et al. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2021 Jul;8(7):3300-3304
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
2018.
Available
at:
https://tbcindia.gov.in/
showfile.php?lid=3314. Accessed on 1 Jan 2021.
Central TB Division. First National Tuberculosis
Drug Resistance survey in India. India: Directorate
General of Health Services MoHFW. 2018.
Available at: https://tbcindia.gov.in/showfile.php?lid
=3315. Accessed on 1 Jan 2021.
Mehari K, Asmelash T, Hailekiros H, Wubayehu
T, Godefay H, Araya T et al. Prevalence and Factors
Associated with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis
(MDR-TB) among Presumptive MDR-TB Patients in
Tigray Region, Northern Ethiopia. Can J Infect Dis
Med Microbiol. 2019:2923549.
Sinha P, Srivastava GN, Gupta A, Anupurba S.
Association of risk factors and drug resistance
pattern in tuberculosis patients in North India. J
Global Infect Dis. 2017;9(4):139-45.
Sharma SK, Kaushik G, Jha B, George N, Arora SK,
Gupta D et al. Prevalence of multidrug-resistant
tuberculosis among newly diagnosed cases of
sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J
Med Res. 2011;133(3):308-11.
Lohiya A, Suliankatchi AR, Rath RS, Jacob O,
Chinnakali P, Goel AD. Prevalence and patterns of
drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in India-A
systematic review and meta-analysis. J Global
Antimicrobial Resistance. 2020;22:308-16.
9.
Rifat M, Milton AH, Hall J, Oldmeadow C, Islam
MA, Husain A. Development of Multidrug Resistant
Tuberculosis in Bangladesh: A Case-Control Study
on Risk Factors. PLoS One. 2014;9(8);e105214.
10. Stosic M, Vukovic D, Babic D, Antonijevic G, Foley
KL, Vujcic I et al. Risk factors for multidrugresistant tuberculosis among tuberculosis patients in
Serbia: a case-control study. BMC Public Health.
2018;18(1):1114.
11. Royce S, Falzon D, van Weezenbeek C, Dara M,
Hyder K, Hopewell P et al. Multidrug resistance in
new tuberculosis patients: burden and implications.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013;17(4):511-3.
12. Ershova JV, Volchenkov GV, Kaminski DA.
Epidemiology of Primary Multidrug-Resistant
Tuberculosis, Vladimir Region, Russia. Emerg Infect
Dis. 2015;21(11):2048-51.
Cite this article as: Verma P, Singh B, Shridhar PK,
Singh G, Singh SP, Rajdev P. Prevalence of multidrug resistant tuberculosis and factors associated with
treatment outcome in 3 districts of Himachal Pradesh,
India. Int J Community Med Public Health
2021;8:3300-4.
International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health | July 2021 | Vol 8 | Issue 7
Page 3304