Eur J Plant Pathol (2009) 125:629–640
DOI 10.1007/s10658-009-9511-6
Flavonoid biosynthesis and degradation play a role in early
defence responses of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus)
against biotic stress
Janne J. Koskimäki & Juho Hokkanen & Laura Jaakola & Marja Suorsa &
Ari Tolonen & Sampo Mattila & Anna Maria Pirttilä & Anja Hohtola
Received: 14 November 2008 / Accepted: 2 July 2009 / Published online: 23 July 2009
# KNPV 2009
Abstract Bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) represents
one of the richest flavonoid sources among plants.
Flavonoids play variable, species-dependent roles in
plant defences. In bilberry, flavonoid metabolism is
activated in response to solar radiation but not against
mechanical injury. In this paper, the defence reaction
and biosynthesis of phenolic compounds of bilberry
was studied after infection by a fungal endophyte
(Paraphaeosphaeria sp.) and a pathogen (Botrytis
cinerea). The defence response of bilberry was faster
against the endophyte than the pathogen. All flavonoid biosynthesis genes tested were activated by each
infection. Biosynthesis and accumulation of phenolic
acids, flavan-3-ols and oligomeric proanthocyanidins
were clearly elevated in both infected samples.
Infection by the pathogen promoted specifically
accumulation of epigallocatechin, quercetin-3Janne J. Koskimäki and Juho Hokkanen have equally
contributed to this work.
J. J. Koskimäki : L. Jaakola : M. Suorsa :
A. M. Pirttilä (*) : A. Hohtola
Department of Biology, University of Oulu,
PO Box 3000, Oulu 90014, Finland
e-mail: am.pirttila@oulu.fi
J. Hokkanen : S. Mattila
Department of Chemistry, University of Oulu,
PO Box 3000, Oulu 90014, Finland
J. Hokkanen : A. Tolonen
Novamass Ltd,
Oulu, Finland
glucoside, quercetin-3-O-α-rhamnoside, quercetin-3O-(4”-HMG)-R-rhamnoside, chlorogenic acid and
coumaroyl quinic acid. The endophyte-infected plants
had a higher content of quercetin-3-glucuronide and
coumaroyl iridoid. Therefore, accumulation of individual phenolic compounds could be specific for each
infection. Quantity of insoluble proanthocyanidins
was the highest in control plants, suggesting that they
might act as storage compounds and become activated
by degradation upon infection.
Keywords Vaccinium myrtillus . Gene expression .
LC-MS . Flavonoid biosynthesis . Proanthocyanidin .
Pathogenesis-related
Abbreviations
CHS chalcone synthase
DFR dihydroflavonol 4-reductase
ANS anthocyanidin synthase
ANR anthocyanidin reductase
PR4
pathogenesis-related protein 4
MEA malt-extract agar
Introduction
Flavonoids are known to play a role in plant
defence against both abiotic and biotic stresses
(Dixon et al. 2002). Flavonoids are one among
several factors contributing to plant resistance
630
(Treutter 2005). Many flavonoid compounds can
function as passive or inducible barriers against
herbivores or microbial pathogens, and the flavonoid
content can increase or the flavonoid composition
can change in response to pathogen attack (Dixon
and Paiva 1995; Miranda et al. 2007; Carlsen et al.
2008). The involvement of flavonoids in plant
defence depends on the species. In annual grasses
that have low flavonoid content, flavonoids are less
significant in defence (Logemann and Hahlbrock
2002).
Bilberry, or European blueberry (Vaccinium myrtillus)
is one of the richest sources of flavonoids, having a
long history of use in folk medicine (Morazzoni and
Bombardelli, 1996). Leaves of bilberry contain high
quantities of proanthocyanidins, catechins, and the
flavonols quercetin and kaempferol (Jaakola et
al. 2004). Flavonoids may play a prominent role in
the defence of bilberry. When subjected to solar
radiation, the content of anthocyanins, catechins,
flavonols and hydroxycinnamic acids increases and
proanthocyanidins decrease in the leaves (Jaakola et
al. 2004). However, flavonoid biosynthesis is not
increased against mechanical injury and therefore
flavonoid compounds may represent passive defences
against herbivores in bilberry (Jaakola et al. 2008).
Economically, bilberry is one of the most
important wild berry species in Northern Europe
due to its high flavonoid content. Very little is
currently known of the pathogenesis of bilberry.
Some studies have concentrated on the ecology of
the parasitic fungus Valdensia heterodoxa on bilberry with respect to nitrogen fertilisation (Witzell
and Shevtsova, 2004). The multihost pathogen
Botrytis cinerea has been isolated from bilberry
(Vlassova et al. 2000) and is one of the most
significant pathogens found on cultivated blueberries
(Hildebrandt et al. 2001). After infection by B.
cinerea, leaves turn light-brown and grey mould is
sometimes found on the surface. Flowers turn brown
and shrivel up, and entire flower clusters can become
destroyed (Hildebrandt et al. 2001). In addition to
pathogen attack, bilberry has constant interaction
with other microbes in the field. Several species of
endophytic fungi that cause no symptoms of disease
are found inside the aerial parts of Vaccinium species
(Sauer et al. 2002). This work concentrates on the
activation of the flavonoid metabolism of wild
bilberry during biotic stress. We studied accumula-
Eur J Plant Pathol (2009) 125:629–640
tion of phenolic compounds and the defence reaction
of bilberry in response to infection by B. cinerea
and an endophytic fungus isolated from the bilberry
stem.
Materials and methods
Isolation of bilberry endophytes
Stem cuttings of healthy, symptomless bilberry plants
were surface-sterilised for 2 min in 70% ethanol and
for 20 min in 6% calcium hypochlorite. The cuttings
were rinsed three times 10 min with sterile water and
aseptically cut into 5 mm-long segments that were
further split in half. The stem pieces were placed onto
2% malt extract agar (MEA) plates and grown at room
temperature (RT) for up to 4 weeks. The plates were
checked every second day for fungal growth and
when detected, the fungal cells were removed and
transferred to a new plate with a cork borer. The
microbes were further subcultured until a pure culture
was obtained. The isolates were studied under a light
microscope for morphological characteristics, and
one representative of each morphologically-distinct
form was collected and maintained in 25% glycerol
at -70°C for further study.
DNA extraction, PCR, cloning, and sequencing
of the fungal 18 S rDNA
One endophyte isolate was selected for the study. For
identification, the isolate was transferred onto 2%
MEA plate topped with cellophane film and grown at
RT for one week. DNA was isolated from the fungus
according to Pirttilä et al. (2001). The 18 S ribosomal
DNA (rDNA) was amplified from the isolated fungal
DNA by PCR (PTC200, MJ Research, Waltham, MA)
in a reaction mixture of universal primers NS1 (5’GTAGTCATATGCTTGTCTC-3’, Saccharomyces
cerevisiae positions 20–38) and NS8 (5’-TCCGCA
GGTTCACCTACGGA-3’, positions 1788–1769)
(White et al. 1990), nucleotides (MBI Fermentas,
Vilnius, Lithuania), buffer, and PCR enzyme (Dynazyme, Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland), using the following PCR programme: 94°C 5 min, 3 cycles of 1 min
at 94°C, 1 min at 53°C, and 3 min at 72°C, followed
by 3 cycles with 51°C, and 30 cycles with 49°C as
annealing temperatures, and extension at 72°C for
Eur J Plant Pathol (2009) 125:629–640
5 min. The PCR products were cloned into pGEM-T
Easy vector with pGEM T-easy vector cloning kit
(Promega, Madison, WI), and transformed into
Escherichia coli DH5α. Plasmid DNA was isolated
and sequenced according to the manufacturer’s
instructions (Abi 3730 DNA Analyser, Abi Prism
BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit, Applied
Biosystems, Warrington, UK). The sequence was
aligned with all accessible sequences obtained
through the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool
(BLAST).
Molecular phylogenetic analysis
In order to further characterise the fungal isolate, the
phylogenetic position was determined. Based on the
alignment data, a phylogenetic analysis for the isolate
was performed with the 18 S rDNA sequences of
close relatives of Paraphaeosphaeria, with Phaeosphaeria nodorum as an outgroup. The sequences were
retrieved from GenBank and aligned by using
ClustalW 1.8.2. (Chenna et al. 2003) with the
following default parameters: gap opening penalty
15.0, gap extension penalty 6.6, and DNA weight
matrix identity. The gap positions were excluded
manually. A distance matrix was created with
DNADIST of Phylip (Felsenstein 1989), from which
the tree topology was built by the neighbour-joining
method in the programme NEIGHBOR. The confidence for individual branches of the resulting tree was
estimated by performing 1000 bootstrap replicates by
using the programmes SEQBOOT, DNADIST,
NEIGHBOR, and CONSENSE.
631
TYVACRAASTGGTAGTTGAC-3’) and ANRF (5’AGCTGAGAAAGCWGCDTGGA-3’) and ANRR
(5’-TCTTTTGYTVAGGAACTTTGC-3’) were
obtained and used in a PCR reaction ( 94°C for
4 min, then 6 times 94°C 1 min 15 s, 70°C 3 min, -0.1°C
s-1 to 38°C, 72°C 2 min, then 50 times 94°C 1 min,
53°C 2 min, 72°C 2 min, and finally 72°C for 5 min).
cDNAs isolated from B. cinerea-infected or from
healthy control leaves of bilberry plants were used as
the template. The products were cloned into pGEM TEasy vector (Promega), sequenced and submitted to
BLAST as described above. Full-length sequences
were isolated with SMARTTM RACE cDNA Amplification kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA).
Infection of bilberry plants with endophyte
and pathogen (Botrytis cinerea)
Plant material
Micropropagated plants were used for the study
because micropropagated plants typically are more
susceptible to infection. Micropropagated bilberry
clones representing the same origin (Botanical Gardens, University of Oulu, Finland) were grown on ½
MS agar medium supplemented with 2-isopentenyl
adenine (5 mg l-1) in sterile conditions for 2 months.
Plants were transferred to root-inducing ½ MS
medium containing indole-3-butyric acid (0.1 mg l-1)
and cultured for 2 months until roots were fully
developed (Jaakola et al. 2001a). Finally, plants were
maintained in plastic containers containing sterilised
soil for 6 weeks (16 h photoperiod, irradiance of
75 µmol m-2 s-1, temperature 22°C).
Isolation of pathogenesis-related gene 4
and anthocyanidin reductase gene (ANR) from bilberry
Fungal infection
The pathogenesis-related protein 4 (PR4) was chosen
to characterise the defence responses, because the
PR4 proteins are chitinases that specifically inhibit
growth of various fungal pathogens. PR4-genes of
Vaccinium vitis-idaea (Pehkonen et al. 2008), Hordeum
vulgare, Triticum monococcum and Prunus dulcis and
ANR-genes of Vitis vinifera, Camellia sinensis and
Medicago truncatula were aligned in the ClustalW
programme (Chenna et al. 2003), and the most
degenerated sequences in the alignments were selected
as primer targets. This way, primers PR4F (5’AARTATGGATGGACGGCVTT-3’) and PR4R (5’-
Botrytis cinerea (strain DSM 5145, DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany) was used in this study as the model
pathogen because it is a known pathogen of blueberry
(Hildebrandt et al. 2001) and widely used in pathogenesis studies. Pathogen and endophyte spores were
diluted in 50 mM HEPES buffer with an estimate of
1,100 spores µl-1;. Bilberry plants were infected by
B. cinerea and the endophyte by pipetting 10 µl of
spore suspension on leaf surfaces. Infected plants
were covered with film to keep the moisture at an
optimal level for fungal growth. Samples were taken
12 h and 24 h after infection. The plant leaves were
632
Eur J Plant Pathol (2009) 125:629–640
cut, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored subsequently
at -70°C.
Success of infection was tested by PCR using
primers specific for the fungal 18 S rRNA. Primers
BC-F (5’-GGCTAGCTTTGGCTGGTCG-3’) and
BC-R (5’-GTGGTGTTGCCACCTCCCTAA-3’),
were used to verify B. cinerea infection. Endophyte
infection was confirmed with primers EF-F (5’TCACTGAGCCATTCAATCGGTAG-3’) and EF-R
(5’-ACGAACGAGACCTTAACCTGCT-3’). The
infected plants were carefully surface-sterilised in a
laminar flow hood in 70% ethanol for 1 min and
rinsed three times in sterile deionised water prior to
DNA isolation. The template DNA was isolated from
the infected, surface-sterilised bilberry leaves according to Pirttilä et al. (2001), and PCR reactions were
carried out as described above with 55°C as the
annealing temperature.
Real-time RT-PCR
The expression of the flavonoid biosynthetic genes
chalcone synthase (CHS), dihydroflavonol 4-reductase
(DFR), anthocyanidin synthase (ANS) and anthocyanidin reductase (ANR) and the PR4 gene was studied
with Real-Time RT-PCR. The primers used to monitor
real-time amplification of each gene are represented in
Table 1. RNA was isolated from the plants according to
Jaakola et al. (2001b) after 12 and 24 h of infection and
reverse-transcribed to cDNA (Superscript II, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The Real-Time PCR analyses
were performed using LightCycler instrument (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) and
Table 1 Primers used for
Real-Time RT-PCR
LightCycler®SYBR Green I Master qPCR kit (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: Initial denaturation at 95°C for
10 min, followed by 45 cycles at 95°C for 10 s (ramp
rate 4.4°C s-1), 60°C for 20 s (ramp rate 2.2°C s-1) and
72 for 10 s (ramp rate 4.4°C s-1). Melting curve was
measured at 95°C for 0.5 s (ramp rate 4.4°C s-1), 57°C
for 15 s (ramp rate 2.2°C s-1) and 98°C for 0 s (ramp
rate 0.11°C s-1). Efficiency of the primers was tested
with various dilutions of uninfected bilberry leaf
cDNA. The uninfected leaf cDNA of the time point
0 h was also used for normalisation in each experiment, to which the expression of the same gene in
other samples was compared. PCR products were
analysed using melting curves, and agarose gel
electrophoresis was used to ensure single-product
amplification. Quantification of PCR products was
performed via calibration curve procedure using
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)
or actin as an internal standard. The equations were
performed with LightCycler software using standard
formulae for Real-Time PCR.
LC-MS analysis of flavonoids and phenolic acids
Sample preparation
Sample preparation was done according to Tolonen
and Uusitalo (2004) with minor changes. A total of
5 mg of powdered, freeze-dried bilberry leaves (24 h
after infection) were extracted using 500 µl of
methanol for 60 min in an ultrasonic bath. After
extraction, the samples were centrifuged for 10 min
Gene
Primers 5’>3’
GenBank No.
Chitinase (PR4)
Forward: GATAAGGTGGCCTTGTGCAT
GQ380568
Reverse: CAAGCTTCTTGTGGCAAGTG
CHS
Forward: CCAAGGCCATCAAGGAATG
AY123765
Reverse: TGATACATCATGAGTCGCTTCAC
DFR
Forward: GAAGTGATCAAGCCGACGAT
AY123767
Reverse: ATCCAAGTCGCTCCAGTTGT
ANS
Forward: TCTTCTACGAGGGCAAATGG
AY123768
Reverse: ACAGCCCATGAAATCCTGAC
Glyceraldehyde-3phosphate dehydrogenase
(GAPDH) primers were
used for the relative quantification of the PCR products
ANR
Forward: GCTGGTGTTTCTCCCACAAT
FJ666338
Reverse: AAATATATGGGCGCGACAAA
GAPDH
Forward: CAAACTGTCTTGCCCCACTT
Reverse: CAGGCAACACCTTACCAACA
AY123769
Eur J Plant Pathol (2009) 125:629–640
at 12,100g and diluted to 1/5 and to 1/100 with 10 %
methanol.
Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry
A Waters Acquity ultra-performance liquid chromatographic (UPLC) system (Waters Corporation, Milford,
MA, USA) with autosampler, vacuum degasser and
column oven was used. The analytical column used
was a Waters ACQUITY HSS T3, (2.1 × 50 mm,
1.8 µm, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA).
The eluents were 0.1% formic acid (A, pH 2.7) and
methanol (B). A linear gradient elution from 10% to
50% B in 12 min was employed, followed by 4 min
isocratic elution with 50% B, 4 min isocratic elution
with 90% B, and column equilibration for 2.5 min
with initial conditions. The flow rate was 0.5 ml min-1
and the column oven temperature was 35ºC. The flow
was directed to mass spectrometer (MS) via ACQUITY photo diode array detector. UPLC/TOF-MS
data were acquired with a Waters LCT Premier XE
time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) using positive (ESI+)
ionisation polarity. Leucine enkephaline was used as a
lock mass compound ([M+H]+ =m/z 556.2771).
Capillary voltage of 2.8 kV was used, while the cone
voltage was set to 80 V. Aperture 1 voltages of 5 V
and 50 V were used in two parallel data acquisition
functions, to obtain only molecular ions with the
lower voltage and more in-source fragmentation data
with the higher voltage. The mass range of m/z 100 –
1,100 was acquired. The W-mode ion optics and the
DRE (dynamic range enhancement) option were
used.
Concentration levels of each standard in calibration
solutions were 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1,000 and
2,000 ng ml-1 and each of them were injected in
duplicate. Also QC-samples were prepared by spiking
methanol to concentrations 400 ng ml -1 and
4000 ng ml-1 in duplicate and they were treated in
the same way as the samples (60 min extraction in
ultrasonic bath and 1/5 dilution). Calibration curves
for standard compounds were generated by plotting
the peak areas of standard compounds as a function of
concentration using quadratic fitting and 1/x weighting. Cyanidin was used as external standard for all
anthocyanins and anthocyanidins, quercitrin was used
as external standard for all flavonols, epicatechin for
all flavan-3-ols and trans-chlorogenic acid for all
633
phenolic acids. [M]+ ions were used for anthocyanins
and anthocyanidins, [M+H]+ ions for all flavan-3-ols
and flavonol glycosides, and [M+Na]+ ions were used
for phenolic acids. A m/z window of ±0.05 amu was
used for generating the extracted ion chromatograms
for standard compounds and all the detected phenolic
compounds in the samples. The detection limits for all
standard compounds were <5 ng ml-1. The linear
ranges were 5–2,000 ng ml-1 for cyanidin, transchlorogenic acid and epicatechin and 20 – 2,000 ng
ml-1 for quercitrin (R2 of the standard curves were
>0.997). The back-calculated accuracies were between
94–118% at the limit of quantitation (LoQ) and 94 –
108% above LoQ for all calibration compounds. The
precisions (relative standard deviation) were <15% at
all standard levels for all calibration compounds. These
estimates of accuracy and precision were considered
acceptable for the purpose. No disappearance/degradation for standard compounds was detected during the
extraction, as the recoveries from QC samples were
between 95% – 108% for all standard compounds at
both QC-levels.
LC-MS analysis of proanthocyanidins
Sample preparation
Sample preparation was performed according to
Määttä et al. (2001) and Jaakola et al. (2004) with
minor changes. The bilberry leaf samples (24 h after
infection) were ground to a fine powder using mortar
and pestle in liquid nitrogen. Powdered leaf samples
(0.125 g) were suspended in 5 ml of acidified (0.6 M
HCl) methanol and vortexed for 15 min. Samples
(1 ml) were then taken for the analysis of extractable
proanthocyanidins and filtered through a 0.45 μm
syringe filter (GHP Bulk Acrodisc 13; Pall Life
Sciences, New York, NY). The remaining suspension
was refluxed for 2 h at 60˚C for the analysis of nonextractable proanthocyanidins. Heating in acid
hydrolyses proanthocyanidins into cyanidin and delphinidin anthocyanins. Also the previously separated
samples were heated at 60˚C in a water bath for 2 h to
hydrolyse the extractable proanthocyanidins.
Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry
The HPLC apparatus was a Waters Alliance 2690
instrument (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and the
634
separations were done using a Waters Atlantis dC18
column (50 × 2.1 mm i.d., 3 μm). A 20-min linear
gradient from 5% to 60% MeOH in 1% formic acid was
used at flow rate of 0.3 ml min-1. Gradient was followed
by 5-min isocratic elution at 60% MeOH and returning
to initial conditions in 2 min and re-equilibration of the
column for 5 min.
The MS instrument used was a Micromass Quattro
II triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with ESI
Z-spray ion source. MS-detection from 150 to
600 Da was used for identification and quantification
of procyanidin and prodelphinidin. Positive ionisation
with capillary voltage of 3.5 kV, cone voltage of 47 V,
source temperature of 80˚C, desolvation temperature
of 350˚C, nebuliser gas flow of 0.3 l min-1 and
desolvation gas flow of 7 l min-1 was used. The
quantification was done by integrating the peaks from
ion chromatograms, created for cyanidin with molecular ion at m/z 287 (±0.5) and for delphinidin at m/z
303 (±0.5). The cyanidin chloride standard solution
concentrations were 0.2, 0.5, 2.0, 5.0, 20, 50 and
100 μg ml-1. Standard curve was generated using
linear fitting (R2 of the standard curve was >0.99).
The proanthocyanidins were quantified by the
weight of the phenolic unit of the molecule using
the response of cyanidin chloride standard solutions
on HPLC/MS. Anthocyanins were not detected in the
leaves, so the quantities of procyanidin and prodelphinidin originating from anthocyanins were assumed
negligible.
Eur J Plant Pathol (2009) 125:629–640
as a pathogen of bilberry, and no symptoms of disease
were visible after infection; the isolate was therefore
chosen for the analysis.
Isolation of pathogenesis-related gene 4 (PR4)
and anthocyanidin reductase (ANR)
The nucleic acid sequence of PR4 gene (GenBank
no. GQ380568) was 76% identical with PR4b genes
of Nicotiana tabacum (X58547.1) and Prunus persica
(AF362989.1). The protein sequence was 81 – 83%
identical and 84 – 87% similar to PR4 proteins of other
plant species. For ANR (GenBank no. FJ666338), a
high homology between the corresponding genes of
other plant species was detected at both amino acid
(87–93%) and nucleotide level (73–85%).
Infection of bilberry with Botrytis cinerea
and endophyte
Plants inoculated with the endophyte, as well as the
uninoculated plants, did not show any superficial
symptoms of disease during the course of the study.
When presence of the endophyte in the bilberry leaves
was examined with PCR, a product was obtained with
the species-specific primers (data not shown), confirming the infection. Plants infected with B. cinerea
had necrotic lesions in the young leaves after 12 h. At
Results
Isolation and identification of bilberry endophytes
Altogether 35 fungal isolates were obtained from
bilberry stems, of which 25 morphologically distinct
forms were selected and stored at -70°C. For identification, the 18 S rDNA was partially sequenced and aligned
with all accessible sequences of the GenBank. The
isolate No. 20 (GenBank No. GQ380569) showed the
highest similarity to Paraphaeosphaeria quadriseptata.
In the phylogenetic tree, the isolate grouped with P.
quadriseptata, P. filamentosa and P. conglomerata
(Fig. 1) and was classified as a Paraphaeosphaeria
species. Because members of this genus have earlier
been found as endophytes (Fukuhara 2002; Ganley and
Newcombe, 2006), there are no reports of this fungus
Fig. 1 Phylogenetic position of the endophyte isolate 20 from
bilberry stems. The 18 S rDNA sequences of the isolate,
Phaeosphaeria nodorum (outgroup), and close relatives within
the genus Paraphaeosphaeria, were analysed with the
neighbour-joining method. Values from 1,000 bootstrap repeats
are presented if support was >50%. The species names are
followed by GenBank accession numbers
Eur J Plant Pathol (2009) 125:629–640
the second stage of infection, after 24 h, the lesions
had become visible also in the fully-grown leaves.
However, the infection was not apparent throughout
the whole plant body.
635
Table 2 Relative expression of bilberry genes quantified by
Real-Time RT-PCR with SYBR-green as the fluorescent
reporter
Gene
PR4
LC-MS analysis of phenolic compounds in bilberry
samples
In all bilberry leaf samples the same flavonoid compounds were detected (Table 3). Three simple flavan-3ols; epicatechin, catechin and epigallocatechin, together
with four phenylpropanoid-substituted catechins, cinhonains, were detected. Eight conjugated phenolic
acids were detected in the leaf samples, including
trans- and cis-isomers of chlorogenic acid, two
different coumaroyl quinic acids, feruloyl quinic acid
and caffeoyl shikimic acid, together with two different
coumaroyl iridoids. Seven diverse flavonol monoglycosides were identified; quercetin-3-O-glucuronide,
quercetin-3-O-galactoside, quercetin-3-O-glucoside,
quercetin-3-O-arabinoside, quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside,
Time (h)
0
Expression of flavonoid biosynthesis and PR4 genes
of bilberry
Expression of the PR4 gene and flavonoid biosynthesis
genes chalcone synthase (CHS), dihydroflavonol 4reductase (DFR), anthocyanidin synthase (ANS), and
anthocyanidin reductase (ANR) was measured in
bilberry in response to infection by a pathogen (B.
cinerea) and the endophyte isolate. Glyceraldehyde 3phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and actin served
as the endogenous reference for normalisation. All
tested genes showed increased expression in the
infected samples. The PR4 gene of bilberry responded
markedly faster against infection by the endophyte than
the pathogen (Table 2). All flavonoid biosynthesis
genes responded faster against the endophyte infection
(Table 2). Expression of the CHS gene that begins the
flavonoid biosynthesis pathway increased with time in
both infected samples (Table 2). The flavonoid
biosynthesis genes DFR and ANS that lead to biosynthesis of leucoanthocyanidins and anthocyanidins,
respectively, had a similar expression profile, with the
highest expression 12 h after infection (Table 2). The
ANR gene responsible for biosynthesis of epicatechin,
the unit of a proanthocyanidin polymer, had increased
expression 24 h after infection by the endophyte but
decreased in pathogen-infected samples (Table 2).
Sample
CHS
DFR
ANS
ANR
12
24
Control
0.88±0.11
0.56±0.34
1.09±0.2
B. cinerea
0.68±0.07
3.95±0.92
2.84±1.13
Endophyte
0.76±0.01
4.49±0.98
5.66±0.24
Control
0.78±0.30
0.79±0.41
0.845±0.32
B. cinerea
0.83±0.21
1.38±0.28
2.87±0.66
Endophyte
0.83±0.16
2.17±0.74
3.73±0.28
Control
0.73±0.38
0.58±0.11
1.12±0.39
B. cinerea
0.54±0.10
2.13±0.08
1.8±0.91
Endophyte
0.94±0.04
3.65±0.64
3.06±1.63
0.59±0
Control
1.01±0.68
0.49±0.25
B. cinerea
0.89±0.46
11.17±2.08
6.31±2.77
Endophyte
0.88±0.21
18.02±1.8
4.33±0.85
Control
0.88±0.11
0.55±0.34
1.09±0.2
B. cinerea
0.68±0.07
3.95±0.92
2.84±1.13
Endophyte
0.76±0.01
4.49±0.98
5.66±0.24
Quantification of PCR products was performed via calibration
curve procedure (LightCycler Software Version 4.0, Roche
Applied Sciences) using glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as an internal standard. Data represent fold
differences in expression with the standard deviation from three
comparisons
kaempferol-3-O-glucuronide and quercetin-3-O-[4’’(3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaroyl)]-α-rhamnoside. Also
four different procyanidins (PCs) were detected;
trimeric PC with two A-type interflavan linkages
between (epi)catechin ((E)C) units (A-type PC
trimer), trimeric PC with one A-type linkage and
one B-type linkage between (E)C units (A/B-type PC
trimer), dimeric PC with B-type linkage between (E)
C units (B-type PC dimer) and dimeric PC with Atype linkage between (E)C units (A-type PC dimer).
Individual procyanidins were not quantitated, but
their relative responses were in good agreement with
the results obtained for the oligomeric proanthocyanidins (data not shown). Detailed information on the
identification of these compounds is described elsewhere (Hokkanen et al., submitted manuscript), except
for B-type procyanidin dimer, for which the exact
masses of fragment ions in positive ionisation mode
and proposed fragmentation reactions are presented in
Fig. 2.
636
Eur J Plant Pathol (2009) 125:629–640
Table 3 Flavonoid content of the bilberry leaf samples determined by LC-MS
Compound name
RT [min]
Calibration compound
Contenta in freeze-dried leaves (mg g-1 ±SDb)
Control
B. cinerea
Endophyte
Flavan-3-ols
Epigallocatechin
2.06
epicatechin
0.07±0.00
0.93±0.04
0.10±0.00
Catechin
2.09
epicatechin
0.05±0.00
0.16±0.01
0.13±0.01
Epicatechin
3.43
epicatechin
1.13±0.03
2.28±0.07
1.55±0.05
Cinchonain IIx (isomer 3)
3.58
epicatechin
0.10±0.00
0.29±0.00
0.15±0.00
Cinchonain IIx (isomer 4)
3.72
epicatechin
0.11±0.00
0.40±0.01
0.17±0.00
Cinchonain Ix (isomer 1)
4.41
epicatechin
0.04±0.01
0.26±0.04
0.10±0.02
Cinchonain Ix (isomer 2)
7.88
epicatechin
0.09±0.00
0.02
0.15±0.01
1.58±0.05
4.59±0.19
2.34±0.09
TOTAL
Flavonol monoglycosides
quercetin-3-glucuronide
6.40
quercitrin
1.32±0.00
1.36±0.00
1.40±0.00
quercetin-3-O-β-galactoside
6.41
quercitrin
0.27±0.01
0.26±0.01
0.21±0.00
quercetin-3-O-glucoside
6.59
quercitrin
0.05±0.00
0.08±0.00
0.06±0.00
quercetin-3-O-α-arabinoside
6.95
quercitrin
0.04±0.00
0.04±0.00
0.03±0.00
kaempferol-3-glucuronide
7.47
quercitrin
0.01±0.00
0.02±0.00
0.02±0.00
quercetin-3-O-α-rhamnoside (quercitrin)
7.54
quercitrin
0.11±0.01
0.16±0.01
0.11±0.01
quercetin-3-O-(4’’-HMG)-α-rhamnoside
9.00
quercitrin
0.21±0.01
0.30±0.01
0.24±0.01
2.02±0.02
2.22±0.03
2.07±0.02
9.85±0.43
TOTAL
Phenolic acids
trans-chlorogenic acid
2.50
t-chlorogenic acid
8.21±0.36
20.29±0.89
cis-chlorogenic acid
3.43
t-chlorogenic acid
0.75±0.03
1.65±0.07
0.81±0.03
Coumaroyl quinic acid (isomer 2)
3.53
t-chlorogenic acid
0.23±0.01
0.47±0.03
0.21±0.01
Caffeoyl shikimic acid
3.98
t-chlorogenic acid
0.03±0.00
0.05±0.00
0.03±0.00
Feruloyl quinic acid (isomer 1)
4.00
t-chlorogenic acid
0.03±0.00
0.04±0.00
0.02±0.00
Coumaroyl quinic acid (isomer 4)
4.46
t-chlorogenic acid
0.09±0.00
0.19±0.01
0.09±0.00
Coumaroyl Iridoid (isomer 1)
5.76
t-chlorogenic acid
0.05±0.00
0.06±0.00
0.07±0.00
Coumaroyl Iridoid (isomer 2)
6.21
t-chlorogenic acid
TOTAL
0.15±0.00
0.21±0.00
0.34±0.01
9.53±0.42
22.97±1.01
11.42±0.50
a
The absolute quantities for the compounds different than the standard compounds used (trans-chlorogenic acid, quercitrin and
epicatechin) may slightly differ from the quantities presented, due to the fact that LC/MS responses for different compounds may vary
even though the standard compounds are structurally highly similar. Nevertheless, this has very little effect on the comparison between
samples as the difference in the LC/MS response is the same in all samples as long as the quantities are on the linear range of the
method.
b
SD=standard deviation of three replicates
The isomer numbers shown in parenthesis refer to those given in Hokkanen et al., submitted manuscript
When content of phenolic compounds of the infected
samples was analysed, an increase was observed 24 h
after infection (Table 3). Both infected samples had
increased content of flavan-3-ols, specifically catechin
and epicatechin. The content of epigallocatechin
increased over ten-fold in pathogen-infected plants
whereas no significant increase was observed in
endophyte-infected plants (Table 3). The quantities of
quercetin-3-glucoside, quercetin-3-O-α-rhamnoside
and quercetin-3-O-(4’’-HMG)-R-rhamnoside increased
in pathogen-infected samples, and the content of
quercetin-3-glucuronide was increased specifically in
endophyte-infected plants (Table 3). The content of
conjugated phenolic acids, specifically chlorogenic
Eur J Plant Pathol (2009) 125:629–640
637
Fig. 2 Detected fragment ions with exact masses together with
proposed fragmentation pathway for B-type procyanidin dimer.
The retro Diels-Alder (RDA) fragmentation together with
quinone-methide (QM) cleavage of the interflavan linkage are
shown. Both of these fragmentation reactions are typical of
B-type proanthocyanidins
acid and coumaroyl quinic acid, was doubled in the
pathogen-infected samples (Table 3). The content of
coumaroyl iridoid was doubled in the endophyteinfected plants (Table 3).
The LC-MS analysis showed that both pathogenand endophyte-infected bilberry leaf samples had
almost no change in the quantity of total proanthocyanidins (Table 4). When the proanthocyanidin pools
Table 4 Proanthocyanidin
content of the bilberry leaf
samples determined by
LC-MS
Content in freeze-dried leaves (mg g-1 ±SD)
Compound name
Control
Insoluble proanthocyanidins
Extractable proanthocyanidins
TOTAL
B. cinerea
Endophyte
Procyanidin
0.33±0.02
0.20±0.01
0.08±0.004
Prodelphinidin
0.02±0.001
0.01±0.001
0.001±0.0001
Procyanidin
0.10±0.005
0.33±0.02
0.40±0.02
Prodelphinidin
0.02±0.001
0.05±0.002
0.04±0.004
Procyanidin
0.43±0.02
0.53±0.03
0.48±0.02
Prodelphinidin
0.04±0.002
0.06±0.003
0.04±0.002
638
were studied further, the quantity of insoluble proanthocyanidins was clearly the highest in the uninfected
control samples and the lowest in the infected samples,
especially in the endophyte-infected sample (Table 4).
In contrast, the quantity of oligomeric proanthocyanidins was the highest in both infected bilberry samples
and the lowest in the uninfected sample (Table 4). A
similar trend was detected among both procyanidins
and prodelphinidins (Table 4).
Discussion
Previously we found that flavonoid metabolism is not
activated in response to wounding in bilberry, suggesting that flavonoids represent mainly passive defences
against mechanical injury (Jaakola et al. 2008). The
current study concentrated on the biosynthesis of
phenolic compounds of bilberry in response to biotic
stress. Based on both the analysis of gene expression
and quantification of compounds, the endophyteinfected and pathogen-infected bilberry plants had
increased biosynthesis of phenolic compounds.
There are no earlier studies on biosynthesis of
phenolic compounds in response to endophyte
infection, although infection by rhizobia and mycorrhiza increase flavonoid biosynthesis moderately
and locally, and can be highly species-specific
(McKhann et al. 1997; Larose et al. 2002; Carlsen
et al. 2008). Infection of plant tissue by rhizobia and
mycorrhiza can induce production of chitinases and
defence proteins specific for the interaction (Pozo et
al. 1999; Salzer et al. 2004). PR genes are produced
equally, or to a less degree towards rhizobia and
mycorrhiza than promoted by a pathogen (Mohr et
al. 1998). Endophytes typically promote stronger
and faster defence responses than pathogens, characterised by production of H2O2, and elevated
activity of the phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL)
enzyme (Schulz et al. 1999; Laukkanen et al. 2000).
Based on these earlier findings, the faster activation
of the PR4 gene by endophyte infection than by
pathogen infection was expected in bilberry.
The content of phenolic compounds increased in
both infected samples. Infection by the pathogen
promoted specifically accumulation of epigallocatechin,
quercetin-3-glucoside, quercetin-3-O-α-rhamnoside,
quercetin-3-O-(4’’-HMG)-R-rhamnoside, chlorogenic
acid and coumaroyl quinic acid. The endophyte-
Eur J Plant Pathol (2009) 125:629–640
infected plants had a higher content of quercetin3-glucuronide and coumaroyl iridoid. Therefore,
accumulation of individual phenolic compounds
could be specific for each infection. Another
interesting detail was discovered in the proanthocyanidin pools of the test samples. The uninfected
samples contained high quantities of insoluble
proanthocyanidins, whereas the infected samples
had an abundance of less polymerised, oligomeric
proanthocyanidins. Meanwhile, the content of insoluble proanthocyanidins had dropped.
Our results suggest that flavan-3-ols, oligomeric
proanthocyanidins and phenolic acids are needed for
the defence of bilberry, and that the proanthocyanidins
might be stored in a polymerised form that becomes
activated by degradation. We obtained similar results in
our earlier experiments on bilberry plants responding to
stress caused by solar radiation (Jaakola et al. 2004).
Proanthocyanidin degradation in response to biotic
stress has not been reported to date in other plant
species, but polymerisation of catechins to oligomeric
proanthocyanidins and 2,3-cis isomerisation occurs in
tea (Camellia sinensis) during infection by the fungal
pathogen Exobasidium vexans (Punyasiri et al. 2004).
Whereas many phenolic acids fail to exhibit direct
antifungal activity, they can contribute to plant resistance via secondary mechanisms (Lee & Bostock 2007;
Muthuswamy & Vasantha 2007; Pandey et al. 2007).
In contrast, previous studies have shown that flavan-3ols, such as catechin and epicatechin, and oligomeric
proanthocyanidins have inhibitory and antifungal properties towards B. cinerea (Goetz et al. 1999; Hébert et
al. 2002) and other fungi (de Colmenares et al. 1998;
Veluri et al. 2004). Proanthocyanidin oligomers
specifically inhibit fungal enzymes such as protein
kinase and stillbene oxidase (Polya and Foo 1994;
Goetz et al. 1999). Due to their potent antifungal
properties, flavan-3-ols and oligomeric proanthocyanidins might function as an important growthlimiting factor towards endophytic and pathogenic
fungi, and play an important role in plant defence
against fungal pathogens.
Acknowledgements We thank Dr. P. J. Fisher (University of
Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK) for the advice on endophyte isolation
from the Ericaceae. This work was supported by the Ella and Georg
Ehrnrooth Foundation and Academy of Finland (No. 118569), and
is part of the Endis Network (Discovery and Development of
Antibacterials from Endophytes) at the University of Oulu.
Eur J Plant Pathol (2009) 125:629–640
References
Carlsen, S. C. K., Understrup, A., Fomsgaard, I. S., Mortensen,
A. G., & Ravnskov, S. (2008). Flavonoids in roots of
white clover: interaction of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
and a pathogenic fungus. Plant Soil, 302, 33–43.
Chenna, R., Sugawara, H., Koike, T., Lopez, R., Gibson, T. J.,
Higgins, D. G., et al. (2003). Multiple sequence alignment
with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids
Research, 31, 497–500.
de Colmenares, N. G., Ramirez-Martinez, J. R., Aldana, J. O.,
Ramos-Nino, M. E., Clifford, M. N., Pekerar, S., et al.
(1998). Isolation, characterisation and determination of
biological activity of coffee proanthocyanidins. Journal of
the Science of Food and Agriculture, 77, 368–372.
Dixon, R. A., & Paiva, N. L. (1995). Stress-Induced Phenylpropanoid Metabolism. Plant Cell, 7, 1085–1097.
Dixon, R. A., Achnine, L., Kota, P., Liu, C.-J., Reddy, M. S. S.,
& Wang, L. (2002). The phenylpropanoid pathway and
plant defence—a genomics perspective. Molecular Plant
Pathology, 3, 371–390.
Felsenstein, J. (1989). PHYLIP — Phylogeny Inference
Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics, 5, 164–166.
Fukuhara, M. (2002). Three Phaeosphaeria species and Paraphaeosphaeria michotii isolated from Phragmites leaves
in Osaka, Japan. Mycoscience, 43, 375–382.
Ganley, R. J., & Newcombe, G. (2006). Fungal endophytes in
seeds and needles of Pinus monticola. Mycological
Research, 110, 318–327.
Goetz, G., Fkyerat, A., Metais, N., Kunz, M., Tabacchi, R., Pezet,
R., et al. (1999). Resistance factors to grey mould in grape
berries: identification of some phenolics inhibitors of Botrytis
cinerea stilbene oxidase. Phytochemistry, 52, 759–767.
Hébert, C., Charles, M. T., Gauthier, L., Willemot, C.,
Khanizadeh, S., & Cousineau, J. (2002). Strawberry
proanthocyanidins: Biochemical markers for Botrytis
cinerea resistance and shelf-life predictability. Acta Horticulturae, 567, 659–662.
Hildebrandt, P. D., McRae, K. B., & Lu, X. (2001). Factors
affecting flower infection and disease severity of lowbush
blueberry by Botrytis cinerea. Canadian Journal of Plant
Pathology, 23, 364–370.
Jaakola, L., Tolvanen, A., Laine, K., & Hohtola, A. (2001a). Effect
of N6-isopentenyladenine concentration on growth initiation
in vitro and rooting of bilberry and lingonberry microshoots.
Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 66, 73–77.
Jaakola, L., Pirttilä, A. M., & Hohtola, A. (2001b). Isolation of
RNA from bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus). Molecular
Biotechnology, 19, 201–203.
Jaakola, L., Määttä-Riihinen, K., Kärenlampi, S., & Hohtola, A.
(2004). Activation of flavonoid biosynthesis by solar
radiation in bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) leaves. Planta,
218, 721–728.
Jaakola, L., Koskimäki, J. J., Riihinen, K., Tolvanen, A., &
Hohtola, A. (2008). Effect of wounding on chalcone
synthase and pathogenesis related PR10 gene expression
and content of phenolic compounds in bilberry leaves.
Biologia Plantarum, 52, 391–395.
Larose, G., Chenevert, R., Moutoglis, P., Gagne, S., Piche, Y., &
Vierheilig, H. (2002). Flavonoid levels in roots of Medicago
639
sativa are modulated by the developmental stage of the
symbiosis and the root colonizing arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungus. Journal of Plant Physiology, 159, 1329–1339.
Laukkanen, H., Soini, H., Kontunen-Soppela, S., Hohtola,
A., & Viljanen, M. (2000). A mycobacterium isolated
from tissue cultures of mature Pinus sylvestris interferes
with growth of Scots pine seedlings. Tree Physiology, 20,
915–920.
Lee, M. H., & Bostock, R. M. (2007). Fruit exocarp phenols in
relation to quiescence and development of Monilinia
fructicola infections in Prunus spp.: A role for cellular
redox? Phytopathology, 97, 269–277.
Logemann, E., & Hahlbrock, K. (2002). Crosstalk among stress
responses in plants: Pathogen defence overrides UV
protection through an inversely regulated ACE/ACE type
of light-responsive gene promoter unit. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, 99, 2428–2432.
Määttä, K., Kamal-Eldin, A., & Törrönen, R. (2001). Phenolic
compounds in berries of black, red, green, and white currants
(Ribes sp.). Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 3, 981–993.
McKhann, H. I., Paiva, N. L., Dixon, R. A., & Hirsch, A. M.
(1997). Chalcone synthase transcripts are detected in
alfalfa root hairs following inoculation with wild-type
Rhizobium meliloti. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 10, 50–58.
Miranda, M., Ralph, S. G., Mellway, R., White, R., Heath, M. C.,
Bohlmann, J., et al. (2007). The transcriptional response of
hybrid poplar (Populus trichocarpa x P-deltoides) to
infection by Melampsora medusae leaf rust involves
induction of flavonoid pathway genes leading to the
accumulation of proanthocyanidins. Molecular PlantMicrobe Interactions, 20, 816–831.
Mohr, U., Lange, J., Boller, T., Wiemken, A., & Vogeli-Lange,
R. (1998). Plant defence genes are induced in the
pathogenic interaction between bean roots and Fusarium
solani, but not in the symbiotic interaction with the
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. New
Phytologist, 138, 589–598.
Morazzoni, P., & Bombardelli, E. (1996). Vaccinium myrtillus
L. Fitoterapia, 67, 3–29.
Muthuswamy, S., & Vasantha, R. H. P. (2007). Fruit phenolics
as natural antimicrobial agents : Selective antimicrobial
activity of catechin, chlorogenic acid and phloridzin.
International Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 5, 81–85.
Pandey, M. K., Sarma, B. K., Singh, D. P., & Singh, U. P.
(2007). Biochemical investigations of sclerotial exudates
of Sclerotium rolfsii and their antifungal activity. Journal
of Phytopathology, 155, 84–89.
Pehkonen, T., Koskimäki, J. J., Riihinen, K., Pirttilä, A. M.,
Hohtola, A., Jaakola, L., et al. (2008). Artificial infection
of Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. and defence responses to
Exobasidium species. Physiological and Molecular Plant
Pathology, 12, 146–150.
Pirttilä, A. M., Kämäräinen, T., Hirsikorpi, M., Jaakola, L., &
Hohtola, A. (2001). DNA isolation methods for medicinal
and aromatic plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter,
19, 273a–f.
Polya, G. M., & Foo, L. Y. (1994). Inhibition of eukaryote
signal-regulated protein kinases by plant-derived catechinrelated compounds. Phytochemistry, 35, 1399–1405.
640
Pozo, M. J., Azcón-Aguilar, C., Dumas-Gaudot, E., & Barea, J.
M. (1999). β-1, 3-Glucanase activities in tomato roots
inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and/or
Phytophthora parasitica and their possible involvement
in bioprotection. Plant Science, 141, 149–157.
Punyasiri, P. A. N., Tanner, G. J., Abeysinghe, S. B., Kumar,
V., Campbell, P. M., & Pradeepa, N. H. L. (2004).
Exobasidium vexans infection of Camellia sinensis increased 2, 3-cis isomerization and gallate esterification of
proanthocyanidins. Phytochemistry, 65, 2987–2994.
Salzer, P., Feddermann, N., Wiemken, A., Boller, T., &
Staehelin, C. (2004). Sinorhizobium meliloti-induced
chitinase gene expression in Medicago truncatula ecotype
R108-1: a comparison between symbiosis-specific class Vand
defence-related class IV chitinases. Planta, 219, 626–638.
Sauer, M., Lu, P., Sangar, R., Kennedy, S., Polishook, J., Bills,
G., et al. (2002). Estimating polyketide metaholic potential
among non-sporulating fungal endophytes of Vaccinium
macrocarpon. Mycological Research, 106, 460–470.
Schulz, B., Römmert, A.-K., Dammann, U., Aust, H.-J., & Strack,
D. (1999). The endophyte-host interaction: a balanced
antagonism? Mycological Research, 103, 1275–1283.
Tolonen, A., & Uusitalo, J. (2004). Fast screening method for
the analysis of total flavonoid content in plants and
Eur J Plant Pathol (2009) 125:629–640
foodstuffs by high-performance liquid chromatography/
electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry
with polarity switching. Rapid Communications in Mass
Spectrometry, 18, 3113–3122.
Treutter, D. (2005). Significance of flavonoids in plant
resistance and enhancement of their biosynthesis. Plant
Biology, 7, 581–591.
Veluri, R., Weir, T. L., Bais, H. P., Termitz, F. R. S., & Ivanco,
J. M. V. (2004). Phytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of
catechin derivatives. Journal of Agricultural and Food
Chemistry, 52, 1077–1082.
Vlassova, T., Likhachev, A. & Blintsov, A. (2000). Accumulation of abscisic acid in culture filtrates of selected
species of genus Botrytis. (Paper presented at the XIIth
International Botrytis symposium (p. 23) Reims, France)
White, T. J., Burns, T., Lee, S., & Taylor, J. (1990).
Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal
RNA genes for phylogenetics. In M. A. Innis, D. H.
Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky & T. J. White (Eds.), PCR Protocols
(pp. 315–322). San Diego: Academic.
Witzell, J., & Shevtsova, A. (2004). Nitrogen-induced changes
in phenolics of Vaccinium myrtillus - implications for
interaction with a parasitic fungus. Journal of Chemical
Ecology, 30, 1937–1956.