Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
...Read more
TO EVALUATE THE PO PREPARATION OF BAR Chakrad P.G. Department of Shalya, S. INTRODUCTION A number of people suffer from due to urinary stones (calculi). A 10.0% of men and 3.0% of w stone at least once, during their a Areas of high incidence of urin worldwide include the British Is navian countries, northern Austr Europe, northern India, Pakistan terranean Countries [2] [3] . Saura of Gujarat has higher prevalenc stones. According to an estimate 6, 00,000 Americans suffer fr stones [4] . In India, 12% of the p expected to have urinary ston which 50% may end up with los or renal damage. Also, nearly population of northern India s kidney stones [5] . Calcium ston common, comprising 75% of all culi [6] . Although, development Research Article Inter Objective:-Renal calculi are one after removal by surgery in mos Barley) is used to explore the su existing and recurrent Nephrolit patients. 10 patients of Group I indigenous drug called GCP Co studied by periodic ultrasonogr studies evaluating the use of th articles were then critically revie P - value of less than 0.05 wa significant difference observed in value were compared. Conclus calcium oxalate stone (Vataja A indigenous GCP Compound in su Keywords: Ashmari, GCP Comp OTENTIAL OF YAVA PANEEYA KSHAR RLEY) ON NEPHROLITHIASIS – A PILO dhar K. V., Dattatreya Rao. S .V. Ayurvedic Medical College, Tirupati, Andra m problems As much as women have adult life [1] . inary calculi sles, Scandi- ralia, central n and Medi- ashtra region ce of urinary e every year, rom urinary population is nes, out of ss of kidneys 15% of the suffers from nes are most urinary cal- t of modern techniques such as Extra wave lithotripsy (ESWL) [7 ous nephrolithotomy (PCN tionized surgical managem lem, yet not much progress towards the medical manag stone problem. Patients may comfort, soreness or pain site. A prescription for pain cation or extra strength of a recommended. Some patien comfort or pain as particles ureter. A large number of plants are being routinely u ners of Ayurvedic system o treatment of urinary ston Many plants have also been the world which is able t stones [7][8] [9][10][11] .Size of t very important disposing found that the stone ≤5 mm rnational Ayurvedic Medical Journal ABSTRACT e among such diseases which is associated with st of the cases. In this study, Yava Kshara (Alka upportive evidence of Litholytic activity in the thiasis. Method: - A comparative study was c recieved Yava Kshara and remaining 10 patien ompound for a period of 60 days. The size of r raphic assessmement in both groups. Mechani hese agents were identified using the Medline ewed and summarized. Results: - Statistical anal as seen in Group I from 0 to 60 days course n the stone size in Group II when the actual valu sion: - Yava Kshara can be used to reduce th Ashmari) and it is shown to have better result uch cases. pound, Paneeya kshara , Renal calculi, Yava ksh RA (ALKALI OT STUDY apradesh, India acorporeal shock 7] and Percutane- NL) have revolu- ment of the prob- s has been made gement of kidney y experience dis- at the treatment n relieving medi- acetaminophen is nts also show dis- pass through the Indian medicinal used by practitio- of medicine in the ne disease [6][7] . reported all over to inhibit kidney the stone is also a factor. It was m in size sponta - ISSN:2320 5091 h recurrence even ali preparation of e management of conducted on 20 nts were given an renal calculi was istic and clinical e data base. The lysis showed that e. There was no ue and calculated he recurrence of t than the use of hara
Chakradhar K. V. & Dattatreya Rao. S to Evaluate the Potential of Yava Paneeya Kshara (Alkali Preparation of Barley) on Nephrolithiasis – A Pilot Study 31 www.iamj.in IAMJ: Volume 1; Issue 6; Nov– Dec2013 neously passes through the urine, whereas the size more than it is to be treated prop- erly. Most of the time, greater than 10 mm size of stone has been treated surgically. Lo- cation of the stone is also an important fac- tor [12] from treatment point of view. Acute renal colic has symptoms like intermittent colic pain radiating toward lower abdomen, backache, etc. and often associated with symptoms like nausea, vomiting, etc.; lower urinary symptoms like urgency in micturi- tion, dysuria and frequency may also be pre- sent [13] . Management of renal calculi is de- pendent upon size and location of the stone; unbearable pain for the calculi more than 10 mm requires strong analgesics and surgical measures as drugs dissolving such stones have so far been unsuccessful. However, the stones less than this size have been treated successfully using herbal medicines which have posses diuretic, anti-inflammatory, an- timicrobial [2][3] and antispasmodic activities [14][15] . An alarming rise in the incidence of urolithiasis coupled with a motivation pro- vided by W.H.O. (World Health Organiza- tion) to explore the possibility of discover- ing cure on traditional line has created an impetus for further research in the light of Ayurvedic knowledge. So, here an attempt has been made to evaluate the potential of Yava Paneeya Kshara on nephrolithiasis. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 1. To study the Litholytic activity of Yava Kshara (Alkali preparation of Barley). 2. To study the disease Renal Calculi in terms of its etiopathogenesis, clinical ma- nifestations with possible correlation to the description available in modern and Ayur- veda medicine for Urolithiasis. 3. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Ayurvedic formulation in patients with uro- lithiasis by assessing the symptomatic relief, reduction/expulsion of renal stones, urinary biochemical parameters. Grouping: All the patients in the present study have been divided into two groups, containing 10 patients in each group. Group I: 10 patients (Yava Paneeya Kshara) EXPERIMENTAL GROUP Group II: 10 patients (GCP Compound) CONTROL GROUP MATERIALS AND METHODS Total 20 patients were taken up for study from P.G. Department of Shalya, consider- ing selection criteria based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.10 patients were given Yava Kshara (Alkali preparation of Barley) 400mg twice in a week internally mixed with 200 ml of sterile water, before meal in the morning for a period of 6 weeks. Re- maining 10 patients were given GCP Com- pound (An indigenous compound prepared out of Gokshuradi guggulu, Chandraprabha Vati, Punarnavadi mandoora in equal quan- tities) internally with dosage of 500 mg BID schedule for a period of 6 weeks. Renal stones were diagnosed by X-ray kidney, ureter and bladder (KUB) and ultrasonogra- phy. Both the groups were subjected for a subjective parameters (Pain, Burning mic- turition, Dysuria, Tenderness at renal angle) and Objective parameters (X-ray KUB, USG KUB) following a standard proforma [13] . USG for KUB determines size, consistency and location of calculus and it play an im- portant role in assessing objective criteria. In both the groups all the patients were in- structed to follow their normal dietetics and to maintain regular intervals in between the two meals. All the patients were advised to resist from all the diets which are directly or indirectly contributory to the formation of stone. Further all the patients were in- structed to take plenty of water [14]. 4.2. Drug Study: Kshara (alkali) preparation of Barley (Yava Kshara Nirma a Vidhi): This is an alkali substance, which is being prepared from the breads of Barley by adopting pro- cedure of Kshara Nirmana Vidhi as per text. Dry Yava Panchanga should be divided into
Research Article Intern ternational Ayurvedic Medical Journal ISSN:2320 I 5091 TO EVALUATE THE POTENTIAL OF YAVA PANEEYA KSHARA (ALKALI PREPARATION OF BARLEY) ON NEPHROLITHIASIS A PILOT STUDY Chakradha adhar K. V., Dattatreya Rao. S drapradesh, India P.G. Department of Shalya,, S.V. A Ayurvedic Medical College, Tirupati, Andrapr ABSTRACT Objective:-Renal calculi are one among such diseases which is associated with recurrence even after removal by surgery in most ost of the cases. In this study, Yava Kshara (Alka Alkali preparation of Barley) is used to explore the suppor supportive evidence of Litholytic activity in the management of existing and recurrent Nephrolit olithiasis. Method: - A comparative study wass conducted c on 20 patients. 10 patients of Group oup I rrecieved Yava Kshara and remaining 10 patient ents were given an indigenous drug called GCP Com ompound for a period of 60 days. The size of renal r calculi was studied by periodic ultrasonogra ographic assessmement in both groups. Mechanis nistic and clinical studies evaluating the use of the these agents were identified using the Medline ine data base. The articles were then critically review viewed and summarized. Results: - Statistical anal nalysis showed that P - value of less than 0.05 wa was seen in Group I from 0 to 60 days course ourse. There was no significant difference observedd in tthe stone size in Group II when the actual value and calculated value were compared. Conclusi usion: - Yava Kshara can be used to reduce the recurrence of calcium oxalate stone (Vatajaa As Ashmari) and it is shown to have better result ult than the use of indigenous GCP Compound inn suc such cases. Keywords: Ashmari, GCP Compound, ompound, Paneeya kshara , Renal calculi, Yava a kshara kshar INTRODUCTION A number of people suffer from rom problems due to urinary stones (calculi). ). As much as 10.0% of men and 3.0% of wom women have stone at least once, during their ir aadult life [1]. Areas of high incidence of urina urinary calculi worldwide include the Britishh Isl Isles, Scandinavian countries, northern Austra Australia, central Europe, northern India, Pakistan tan and Medi[2] [3] terranean Countries . Sauras urashtra region of Gujarat has higher prevalence nce of urinary stones. According to an estimate ate every year, 6, 00,000 Americans suffer from urinary stones [4]. In India, 12% of the popul population is expected to have urinary stone tones, out of which 50% may end up with loss oss of kidneys or renal damage. Also, nearlyy 15% of the population of northern India suf suffers from [5] kidney stones . Calcium stone ones are most common, comprising 75% of all urinary calculi [6]. Although, development nt of modern techniques such as Extracorporeal Extrac shock [7 [7] wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCN NL) have revolutionized surgical manageme ment of the problem, yet not much progress ess has been made towards the medical manage nagement of kidney stone problem. Patients may ay experience discomfort, soreness or pain n at the treatment site. A prescription for pain ain relieving medication or extra strength of acetaminophen a is recommended. Some patient ents also show discomfort or pain as particles es pass through the ureter. A large number of Indian I medicinal plants are being routinely used us by practitioners of Ayurvedic system of medicine in the treatment of urinary stone tone disease [6][7]. Many plants have also been r en reported all over the world which is able to inhibit kidney stones [7][8] [9][10][11].Size of the stone is also a very important disposing ng factor. It was m in size sponta found that the stone ≤5 mm Chakradhar K. V. & Dattatreya Rao. S to Evaluate the Potential of Yava Paneeya Kshara (Alkali Preparation of Barley) on Nephrolithiasis A Pilot Study neously passes through the urine, whereas the size more than it is to be treated properly. Most of the time, greater than 10 mm size of stone has been treated surgically. Location of the stone is also an important factor [12] from treatment point of view. Acute renal colic has symptoms like intermittent colic pain radiating toward lower abdomen, backache, etc. and often associated with symptoms like nausea, vomiting, etc.; lower urinary symptoms like urgency in micturition, dysuria and frequency may also be present [13]. Management of renal calculi is dependent upon size and location of the stone; unbearable pain for the calculi more than 10 mm requires strong analgesics and surgical measures as drugs dissolving such stones have so far been unsuccessful. However, the stones less than this size have been treated successfully using herbal medicines which have posses diuretic, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial[2][3] and antispasmodic activities [14][15] . An alarming rise in the incidence of urolithiasis coupled with a motivation provided by W.H.O. (World Health Organization) to explore the possibility of discovering cure on traditional line has created an impetus for further research in the light of Ayurvedic knowledge. So, here an attempt has been made to evaluate the potential of Yava Paneeya Kshara on nephrolithiasis. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 1. To study the Litholytic activity of Yava Kshara (Alkali preparation of Barley). 2. To study the disease Renal Calculi in terms of its etiopathogenesis, clinical manifestations with possible correlation to the description available in modern and Ayurveda medicine for Urolithiasis. 3. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Ayurvedic formulation in patients with urolithiasis by assessing the symptomatic relief, reduction/expulsion of renal stones, urinary biochemical parameters. Grouping: 31 www.iamj.in All the patients in the present study have been divided into two groups, containing 10 patients in each group. Group I: 10 patients (Yava Paneeya Kshara) –EXPERIMENTAL GROUP Group II: 10 patients (GCP Compound) – CONTROL GROUP MATERIALS AND METHODS Total 20 patients were taken up for study from P.G. Department of Shalya, considering selection criteria based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.10 patients were given Yava Kshara (Alkali preparation of Barley) 400mg twice in a week internally mixed with 200 ml of sterile water, before meal in the morning for a period of 6 weeks. Remaining 10 patients were given GCP Compound (An indigenous compound prepared out of Gokshuradi guggulu, Chandraprabha Vati, Punarnavadi mandoora in equal quantities) internally with dosage of 500 mg BID schedule for a period of 6 weeks. Renal stones were diagnosed by X-ray kidney, ureter and bladder (KUB) and ultrasonography. Both the groups were subjected for a subjective parameters (Pain, Burning micturition, Dysuria, Tenderness at renal angle) and Objective parameters (X-ray KUB, USG KUB) following a standard proforma [13]. USG for KUB determines size, consistency and location of calculus and it play an important role in assessing objective criteria. In both the groups all the patients were instructed to follow their normal dietetics and to maintain regular intervals in between the two meals. All the patients were advised to resist from all the diets which are directly or indirectly contributory to the formation of stone. Further all the patients were instructed to take plenty of water [14]. 4.2. Drug Study: Kshara (alkali) preparation of Barley (Yava Kshara Nirmaņ a Vidhi): This is an alkali substance, which is being prepared from the breads of Barley by adopting procedure of Kshara Nirmana Vidhi as per text. Dry Yava Panchanga should be divided into IAMJ: Volume 1; Issue 6; Nov Dec2013 Chakradhar K. V. & Dattatreya Rao. S to Evaluate the Potential of Yava Paneeya Kshara (Alkali Preparation of Barley) on Nephrolithiasis A Pilot Study small pieces, ignited by sesam samum stalks (Tila) with pebbles of limestone one. When the fire has burnt out, the ash and nd the slake lime was collected separately. Thenn one Droņ a (10.24KGs) of the ash shouldd be di dissolved in six Droņ ās of water and filtere ered 21 times and should be treated on fire in a big pan, while it is slowly stirred by a ladl ladle. When it becomes clear, red, sharp and slimy, it should be filtered through a wide piece of fine cloth and the filtrate should hould be placed again on fire after removing ng the separated residue [16]. 4.3. GCP Compound: A com ompound prepared out of Gokshuradi guggul guggulu - 50gms, Chandraprabha Vati - 50 gms,, Punar Punarnavadi mandoora - 50gms in equal quant quantities. Both the test drugs were prepa epared at the Pharmacy of S.V. Ayurveda Pha Pharmacy, Tirupati. 5. Parameters 5.1.1. Subjective Parameters: s: Assessment of the therapy is done according ng to the relief observed in the signs and symptom ptoms with the help of scoring pattern whichh is prepared according to classical Ayurveda da aand modern texts. 5.1.2Objective Parameters: Bas ased on various investigations like urine,, bl blood, biochemical examination, X-Ray (KUB (KUB), USG (KUB) are carried before and nd after treat.[17] ment 6. Inclusion Criteria 6.1. Age: Between 15 to 60 years ars 6.2. Sex: Either sex 6.3. Radiological evidence of stone tone (up to 10 mm) in Kidney, Ureter and Urina inary Bladder. 7. Exclusion Criteria 7.1. Patients with age below ow 15 years and above 60 years. 7.2. Stone size more than 10 mm. m. 7.3. Impacted stone. 7.4. Gross Hydronephrosis. 7.5. Pyelonephritis. 7.6. Uncontrolled Diabetic Mellit llitus and Hypertension 7.7. Malignancy. 7.8. Impaired Renal Function. 32 www.iamj.in ng Kidney. 7.9. Poorly Functioning Kidne ruction in urinary 7.10. Patients with obstruc passage. wn metabolic abnor7.11. Patients with known m tion. mality for calculus formation. tion of calculus. 7.12. Any other complication ng treatment for any 7.13. Patients undergoing tr other serious illness. 8. Follow Up: under this All the patients who were studied st letion of treatment clinical trial after completi to have for prescribed period weree instructed ins of 7 to 15 regular check up at the interval inte days for the period of 3 months mont (90 days). udy period patients During this follow up study hly for the recurwere examined thoroughly rence of either signs and symptoms of stones. parameters Statistical Analysis: Urinary Urina lyzed by Wilcoxon and calculi size were analyz ical parameters by signed-rank test, biochemica of calculi paired-test and complete expulsion expul ues were expressed by Fisher's exact test. Values as mean ± SD for calculi size, siz relief of clinind biochemical pacal symptoms, urine, and xpulsion of renal rameters. Complete expul he incidence of ocstones was expressed as the treated currences in Ayurvedic formulation form vel of significance groups. The minimum level was fixed at p < 0.05. howed that P-value of Statistical analysis showed less than 0.05 was seen in the first group from 0 to 3 month. There was wa no significant ize within group II difference in the stone size when the 1st month and 3rd month visit was t. compared with initial visit. RESULTS • Out of 28 patients, 10 in each group were completed the thera herapy & follow up period. So, in this study udy, general observations were made on 20 patients as mentioned in Table 1. Analytical Ana study of both the drugs is ment entioned in Table 2 and Results were made de on o 20 patients as shown in Tables 3 to o 4. • Patient satisfaction: At 4 weeks of follow-up, all patients were we asked to ex- IAMJ: Volume 1; Issue 6; Nov Dec2013 Chakradhar K. V. & Dattatreya Rao. S to Evaluate the Potential of Yava Paneeya Kshara (Alkali Preparation of Barley) on Nephrolithiasis A Pilot Study press their degree of satisfaction about treatment outcome in terms of 'cured' / ' markedly improved’ / ‘improved’ /'unchanged' / 'worsened'. In group I (Yava Paneeya Kshara Group), 83.33% patients reported as 'Cured' and 16.67% as ' markedly improved ' while in group II (GCP Compound Group), 66.67% patients reported as ‘improved’ and 33.37% as ‘unchanged’. This difference of patient satisfaction was significant statistically at P < 0.05 using Chi-square test, with Group I patients reporting a higher degree of satisfaction at 04 weeks. • In group I, Statistically highly significance (P<0.001) is noted in the result outcome of Nabhi vedana, Mutradharasanga and Atiavilamutratha while in group II, Statistically highly significance (P<0.001) is noted in the result outcome of Basti Vedana (Bladder pain). DISCUSSION Urolithiasis is a complex process that results from a succession of several physicochemical events including super saturation, nucleation, growth, aggregation and retention within the kidneys. Treatment of urolithiasis involves either conservative therapy or interventional procedures. The primary agents in medical management for urolithiasis, has been investigated with calcium channel blockers, steroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and α 1adrenergic receptor antagonists [18]. Although calcium channel blockers with or without steroids and/or NSAIDs have shown to be successful in the treatment, α -blockers, with their high success rates have become the leading candidate in medical therapy [19]. However, these treatment regimens are not free from side effects. The endoscopic stone management have allowed kidney stones to be treated using minimally invasive techniques, which have increased success rates and decreased treatment-related morbidity. These advances include shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy, and percuta- 33 www.iamj.in neous nephrostolithotomy [6]. Although these approaches are less invasive than the traditional open surgical approaches, they are expensive and have inherent risks .Due to the high cost and adverse effects of minimally invasive techniques and recurrence, alternative treatment modalities with phytotherapeutic agents have become the mainstay of medical therapy. In the present study, an Ayurvedic formulation containing principal herbs useful in the treatment of urinary calculi was evaluated for its safety and efficacy. Levels of urinary super-saturation correlate with the type of stone formed, and lowering of super saturation is effective for preventing stone recurrence and reduces the relapse risk [3]. In vitro crystallization systems are widely used to study the processes of crystal nucleation growth and agglomeration, which in turn helps in exploring the patho-physiology of renal stone disease. In vitro and in vivo studies on crystallization showed an inhibition of the matrix bound mineral phase formation and its subsequent growth with the Yava Paneeya Kshara[20][21]. The findings of the study showed beneficial effects of Ayurvedic formulation (Yava Paneeya Kshara) as revealed by the improvement of various clinical symptoms, increased stone expulsion rate and the time required for expulsion as well as urine microscopy (WBC and RBC), which correlated well with the experimental findings. The observed beneficial effects in the management of urolithiasis following an Ayurvedic formulation treatment in this trial could be due to the prevention of urinary supersaturation, inhibition of mineralization of stone-forming constituents, normalization of cellular function in renal oxidative stress, correction of crystalloid-colloid balance as well as the beneficial effects such as anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, diuretic, antispasmodic, litholytic, and anticalcifying activities of individual ingredients. Study involving larger population of patients will be necessary to confirm the findings of this study. Urolithiasis (Mutrashmari) in IAMJ: Volume 1; Issue 6; Nov Dec2013 Chakradhar K. V. & Dattatreya Rao. S to Evaluate the Potential of Yava Paneeya Kshara (Alkali Preparation of Barley) on Nephrolithiasis A Pilot Study Ayurveda is described as a painful disease which needs to be addressed early. In the beginning stages, disease can be effectively managed with medical intervention, while in the later stages with enlarged stones, the only successful measure would be lithotripsy. The medical management would include the administration of lithotriptic herbs and substances besides the measures to manage the bio-energies that control the disease manifestations. With this line of treatment, Ayurveda envisages that the stone forming substances are controlled, which prevents recurrence of the stone. Role of Yava Kshara YAVA KSHARA -Alkali preparation of Barley Latin name: Hordeum vulgare Family: Gramineae Properties: • Rasa: Kaţ u • Guņ a: Laghu, Snigdha • Virya: Uşņ a • Vipāka: Kaţ u • Doşaghnatā: Kapha Vāta Śāmaka Pharmacological Action: This drug is useful in the pathogenesis like Amlapitta, Aśmari, Mūtrakŗ ccra, Udaraśūla, Gulma, Arśa. Chemical Constituents: The substance contains potassium chloride, potassium sulphate, potassium bicarbonate and potassium carbonate. Yava Kshara (Alkali preparation of Barley) is having pH 11.73. Thus it helps to neutralize the acidic media and prevents stone formation. As the Yava Kshara is alkaline in nature which changes the pH of the urine, this helps in preventing the hyper-concentration of the urine. As it changes the pH of the urine by its alkali nature, it helps in the dissolution of the calculi. Yava Kshara has REFERENCES 1. Coe FL, Parks JH, Asplin JR. The pathogenesis and treatment of kidney stones. New Engl J Med 1992; 327:1141-52. [PUBMED] 34 www.iamj.in undergone clinical trials that support its impact on Calcium Oxalate crystallisation. Preliminary clinical trials have evaluated the role of GCP Compound in the prevention of Urolithiasis and as a method of stone expulsion, yet the treatment effect and mechanism of action remains to be elucidated. CONCLUSION Haematological and biochemical investigations reveal that both groups having statistically non-significant effect on all the parameters. However, it was noticed that the variation in all the parameters were observed within normal range. Both the drugs were found more effective on Vataja Ashmari (Calcium Oxalate Stones), moderately effective on Pittaja Ashmari and least effective on Kaphaja Ashmari in the present Clinical Study. Overall effect of therapy shows that Yava Paneeya kshara group (Experimental Group) --- 40% of patients were cured, 20% markedly improved, 20% improved and 20% remained unchanged. In GCP Compound (Control Group), 10% patients were cured, 10% were markedly improved, 40% improved and 40% remained unchanged. The results of the present study indicated that the Ayurvedic formulation (Yava Paneeya Kshara) is safe and effective in the treatment of urolithiasis, with significant improvement in symptoms associated with renal stones. This Ayurvedic formulation has also shown to facilitate stone expulsion rate. It has significantly reduced concomitant symptomatic treatment with pain killers. Hence, this Ayurvedic formulation appears to be an effective and safe phytotherapeutic agent and could be useful in the alternative management of urolithiasis. 2. Alexander H, Nestor S. Phyllanthus niruri inhibits calcium oxalate endocytosis by renal tubular cells: Its role in nephrolithiasis. Nephron. 1999;81:393–7. [PubMed] 3. Freitas AM, Schor N, Boim MA. The effect of Phyllanthus niruri on urinary inhibi- IAMJ: Volume 1; Issue 6; Nov Dec2013 Chakradhar K. V. & Dattatreya Rao. S to Evaluate the Potential of Yava Paneeya Kshara (Alkali Preparation of Barley) on Nephrolithiasis A Pilot Study tors of calcium oxalate crystallization and other factors associated with renal stone formation. BJU Int. 2002;89:829– 34. [PubMed] 4. Grases F, March JG, Ramis M, CostaBauz´a A. The influence of Zea mays on urinary risk factors for kidney stones in rats. Phytother Res. 1993;7:146–9. 5. Grases F, Ramis M, Costa-Bauza A, March JG. Effect of Herniaria hirsuta and Agropyron repens on calcium oxalate urolithiasis risk in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 1995;45:211–4. [PubMed] 6. Yasui T, Fujita K, Sato M, Sugimoto M, Iguchi M, Nomura S, et al. The effect of Takusya, a Kampou medicine, on renal stone formation and osteopontin expression in rat urolithiasis model. Urol Res.1999;27:194– 9. [PubMed] 7. Dar A, Behbahanian S, Malik A, Jahan N. Hypotensive effect of the Methanolic extract of Mimusops elengi in normotensive rats. Phytomed. 1999;6:373–8. 8. Koti BC, Purnima A. Diuretic activity of extracts of Mimusops elengi Linn. Bark. Int J Green Pharmacy. 2010;4:90–2. 9. Atmani F, Slimani Y, Mimouni M, Hacht B. Prophylaxis of calcium oxalate stones by Herniaria hirsuta on experimentally induced nephrolithiasis in rats. BJU Inter. 2003;92:137–40. 10. Mitra SK, Gopumadhavan S, Venkataranganna MV, Sundaram R. Effect of Cystone, a herbal formulation, on glycolic acid-induced urolithiasis. Phytotherapy Res. 1998;12:372–4. 11. Medeiros DM, Mustafa MA. Proximate composition, mineral content and fatty acids of cat fish (Ictalurus punctatus rafinesque) for different seasons and cooking methods. J Food Sci. 1985;50:585–7. 35 www.iamj.in 12. Fiske CH, Subbarow Y. The colorimetric determination of phosphate. J Biol Chem. 1925;66:375–400. 13. Hodgkinson A, Williams A. An improved colorimetric procedure for urine oxalate. Clinica Chimica Acta. 1972;36:127– 32. 14. Caraway WT. Uric acid. In: Seligson D, editor. Standard methods of clinical chemistry. Vol.4. London: Academic Press; 1963. pp. 239–47. 15. Ellman GL. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1959;82:70–7. [PubMed] 16. Shastri Ambika Dutt. Sushruta Samhita. 11th ed. Vranasi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthan; 1997. Sushrut. Ksharpaakavidhi; pp. 34–5. 17. Takahara S, Hamilton BH, Nell JV, Ogubra TY, Nishimura ET. Hypocatalasemia: A new genetic carrier state. J Clin Invest. 1960;39:610–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 18. Ohkawa H, Ohish N, Yogi K. Assay for lipid peroxidase in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid. Anal.Biochem. 1979;95:351–8. 19. Anand R, Patnaik GK, Kulshreshtha DK, Dhawan BN. Antiurolithiatic activity of lupeol, the active constituent isolated from Crateva nurvala. Phytother Res. 1994;8:417–21. 20. Park HK, Jeong BC, Sung M, Park M, Choi EY, Kim BS, et al. Reduction of oxidative stress in cultured renal tubular cells and preventive effects on renal stone formation by the bioflavonoid quercetin. J Urol. 2007;179:1620–6. [PubMed] 21. Tugcu V, Kemahli E, Ozbek E, Arinci YV, Uhri M, Erturkuner P, et al. Protective effect of a potent antioxidant, pomegranate IAMJ: Volume 1; Issue 6; Nov Dec2013 Chakradhar K. V. & Dattatreya Rao. S to Evaluate the Potential of Yava Paneeya Kshara (Alkali Preparation of Barley) on Nephrolithiasis A Pilot Study juice, in the kidney of rats with nephrolithiasis induced by ethylene glycol. J EnTable 1: No. of Patients Group I dourol. 2008;22:2723–31. [PubMed] Group II Total Registered 15 13 Completed 10 10 LAMA* 05 03 *LAMA – Left Against Medical Advice Table 2: Analytical Study of the Drugs Yava Paneeya Kshara 28 20 08 GCP Compound Specific Gravity 1.019 1.016 pH 11.73 6.38 Table –3: Effect of therapy on clinical features (Acc. to Ayurveda) in 10 patients of Renal calculi by using Yava Paneeya Kshara (Group – I: Experimental group): Clinical features Mean Mean % SD SE ‘t’ P B.T. A.T. Nabhivedana 2.20 1.00 54.55 0.78 0.25 4.80 < 0.001 Bastivedana 1.30 0.60 53.85 0.82 0.26 2.69 < 0.01 Sevanivedana 1.10 0.60 45.45 0.53 0.17 2.94 < 0.01 Mehanvedana 0.80 0.40 50.00 0.70 0.22 1.81 < 0.05 Mutradharasanga 2.10 1.10 47.62 0.66 0.21 4.76 < 0.001 Sarudhiramutrata 0.70 0.30 57.14 0.52 0.16 2.50 < 0.01 Gomedaprakasa 0.70 0.10 85.71 0.84 0.27 2.22 < 0.05 Atiavilamutrata 2.00 0.90 55.00 0.99 0.31 3.55 <0.001 Table –4: Effect of therapy on clinical features (Acc. to Ayurveda) of 10 patients of Renal calculi by using GCP COMPOUND (Group – II: Control Group) Clinical Mean Mean % S.D. S.E. ‘t’ P features B.T. A.T. Nabhivedana Bastivedana Mehanvedana Mutradharasang Sarudhiramutrata Gomedaprakasha Atiavilamutrata 2.20 1.70 0.40 1.10 0.80 0.50 1.60 1.70 0.70 0.10 0.40 0.30 0.10 1.00 22.73 58.82 75.00 63.64 62.50 80.00 37.50 0.53 0.82 0.67 0.82 0.71 0.84 0.70 0.17 0.25 0.21 0.26 0.22 0.27 0.22 2.94 4.00 1.43 2.69 2.27 1.48 2.73 CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Dr. Chakradhar K.V, Final Year P.G. Scholar, P.G. Department of Shalya, S.V. Ayurvedic Medical College & Hospital,SVIMS Road, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. Source of support: Nil, Conflict of interest: None Declared 36 www.iamj.in IAMJ: Volume 1; Issue 6; Nov Dec2013 < 0.01 <0.001 <0.05 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.05 < 0.01
Keep reading this paper — and 50 million others — with a free Academia account
Used by leading Academics
James Quesada
San Francisco State University
Denise L Spitzer
University of Alberta
Amlan Ray
Annamalai University
Veena Das
Johns Hopkins University