Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2000, American Anthropologist
Philosophical psychology
Proving universalism wrong does not prove relativism right: Considerations on the ongoing color categorization debate.2013 •
For over a century, the question of the relation of language to thought has been extensively dealt with in the case of color categorization, where two main views prevail. The relativist view claims that color categories are relative while the universalistic view argues that color categories are universal. Relativists also argue that color categories are linguistically determined, and universalists that they are perceptually determined. Recently, the argument for the perceptual determination of color categorization has been undermined, and the relativist view has regained some ground. This paper argues that although the universalistic account of color categorization has been called into question, this is not enough to establish relativism. Color categories can still be said to be universal or particular, independent of the accounts of their universality or relativity. Because of its polarization, the debate has disregarded some issues that are key in our understanding of color categorization: The question of what a color category is and how to identify it.
2010 •
Philosophy Compass
Why do we name 7 colors in the rainbow? DOI: 10.1111/phc3.121312014 •
What makes it the case that we draw the boundary between “blue” and “green” where we draw it? Do we draw this boundary where we draw it because our perceptual system is biologically determined in this way? Or is it culture and language that guide the way we categorize colors? These two possible answers have shaped the historical discussion opposing so-called universalists to relativists. Yet, the most recent theoretical developments on color categorization reveal the limits of such a polarization.
Forthcoming in Derek Brown & Fiona Macpherson (eds.), Routledge Handbook on the Philosophy of Colour. Routledge (forthcoming)
American Anthropologist
Color Categories in Thought and Language:Color Categories in Thought and Language1999 •
Skusevich and P. Matikas (eds), Color Perception: Physiology, Processes and Analysis, chap. 6, Nova Science Publishers
Is colour composition phenomenal?",2009 •
2000 •
Studies in Language 32.56-92.
The basic colour terms of Lower Sorbian and Upper Sorbian and their typological relevance2008 •
Journal of Cognition and Culture
Culture and cognition: What is universal about the representation of color experience?1988 •
Derek Brown and Fiona Macpherson (ed.) Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Colour
Unique Hues and Colour ExperiencePhenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
A physicalist reinterpretion of 'phenomenal'spaces2006 •
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Language impairment and colour categories2005 •
2005 •
Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore
Color Entrenchment in Middle-School English Speakers: Cognitive Salience Index Applied to Color ListingCross-cultural Research
On the Role of Culture in Color Naming: Remarks on the Articles of Paramei, Kay, Roberson, and Hardin on the Topic of Cognition, Culture, and Color Experience2005 •
Master thesis, LMU München
Zur Semantik der Grundfarbadjektive im Russischen und Tschechischen2001 •
New Directions in Colour Studies
Colors and color adjectives in the cortex2011 •
2002 •
Color Research & Application
Differences in color naming and color salience in Vietnamese and English2003 •
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science
Constraints on Colour Category Formation2012 •
Embodiment in Latin Semantics, edited by Wm. Short, John Benjamins
Abstract and embodied colors in Pliny the Elder’s Natural History2016 •
International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction
On etymology and lexical categorization in the ancient Indo-European languages (2014)2014 •