To successfully face tourism and be able to be a strong enough canvas on which the West can project its longings, Balinese social and ceremonial structures needed to be strong – as they were and mostly still are. Drawing on my own...
moreTo successfully face tourism and be able to be a strong enough canvas on which the West can project its longings, Balinese social and ceremonial structures needed to be strong – as they were and mostly still are. Drawing on my own research on urban ceremonial practice in the south of Bali and previous research, notably on Lansing’s work on rice cultivation and Picard’s study of tourism, I argue that Bali’s long history of irrigated rice-field culture is an important key to understanding the island's social functioning and touristic success.
As we see from Lansing's insightful presentation of the Green Revolution in Bali's agriculture (1991), even well-functioning cooperation and solidarity systems can be challenged by interventionist external policies. In 1979, international experts came to Bali and banned its traditional agricultural water- distribution practices: as all important agricultural events were accompanied by ceremonies, experts assumed that they were entirely irrational. A wheat-style agricultural management was imposed on Balinese rice- farmers, setting short-term individual management and gain goals. The success of the first years and the subsequent spectacular crash of Bali's agriculture could be seen as a mythical tale about the clash of the Wheat-Worldview and the Rice-Worldview. Lansing's comprehensive presentation of this story shows how whole highly useful systems may stay invisible until they are erased and their lack causes a chain reaction of disturbances.
My investigation supports that Bali's ceremonial system is such a complex and highly useful system. Rice-field cultivation has shaped balinese ceremonial practices to make them strongly coherence- and cohesion-inducing. This appears to be true even today in urban settings, far away from rice culture. Balinese religious practice sustains strongly knit ceremonial and social solidarity networks, creates a multitude of ceremonial events, fosters ceremonial artistic and narrative performances, thus creates opportunities for the transmission of social, cultural and moral values. Regular ceremonial practice is still today Bali's social life's backbone and it's cultural continuity's lifeguard.
The lavish private and public ceremonies are an important part of Bali's touristic appeal. This luckily makes it is highly unlikely that an experiment similar to the Green Revolution one would take place again in Bali, targeting it's costly ceremonial practices, labelling them as irrational thus useless. The island attracts millions of tourists every year, making the tourism industry its main source of income and investments. While it does bring changes, touristic success contributes to the preservation of Bali's ceremonial practices, with all their visible and invisible benefits.To successfully face tourism and be able to be a strong enough canvas on which the West can project its longings, Balinese social and ceremonial structures needed to be strong-as they were and mostly still are. Drawing on my own research on urban ceremonial practice in the south of Bali and previous research, notably on Lansing's work on rice cultivation and Picard's study of tourism, I argue that Bali's long history of irrigated ricefield culture is an important key to understanding the island's social functioning and touristic success. As we see from Lansing's insightful presentation of the Green Revolution in Bali's agriculture (1991), even well-functioning cooperation and solidarity systems can be challenged by interventionist external policies. In 1979, international experts came to Bali and banned its traditional agricultural water-distribution practices: as all important agricultural events were accompanied by ceremonies, experts assumed that they were entirely irrational. A wheat-style agricultural management was imposed on Balinese rice-farmers, setting short-term individual management and gain goals. The success of the first years and the subsequent spectacular crash of Bali's agriculture could be seen as a mythical tale about the clash of the Wheat-Worldview and the Rice-Worldview. Lansing's comprehensive presentation of this story shows how whole highly useful systems may stay invisible until they are erased and their lack causes a chain reaction of disturbances. My investigation supports that Bali's ceremonial system is such a complex and highly useful system. Ricefield cultivation has shaped balinese ceremonial practices to make them strongly coherence-and cohesion-inducing. This appears to be true even today in urban settings, far away from rice culture. Balinese religious practice sustains strongly knit ceremonial and social solidarity networks, creates a multitude of ceremonial events, fosters ceremonial artistic and narrative performances, thus creates opportunities for the transmission of social, cultural and moral values. Regular ceremonial practice is still today Bali's social life's backbone and it's cultural continuity's lifeguard. The lavish private and public ceremonies are an important part of Bali's touristic appeal. This luckily makes it is highly unlikely that an experiment similar to the Green Revolution one would take place again in Bali, targeting it's costly ceremonial practices, labelling them as irrational thus useless. The island attracts millions of tourists every year, making the tourism industry its main source of income and investments. While it does bring changes, touristic success contributes to the preservation of Bali's ceremonial practices, with all their visible and invisible benefits.