SEI

Estudo da aplicação, no âmbito da gestão de documentos, da metodologia de identificação
arquivística, fundamentada na teoria diplomática, para subsidiar a implantação do Sistema Eletrônico
de Informações (SEI) na Universidade Federal Fluminense. A diplomática é a ciência que estuda a
estrutura formal dos documentos. A identificação arquivística e sua metodologia, que envolve o estudo
do órgão produtor e da tipologia documental, verifica a materialização da informação nos documentos
de arquivo, produzindo conhecimento sobre a relação dos documentos com o seu contexto de
produção. No âmbito dos arquivos universitários das Instituições Federais de Ensino Superior, a
gestão de documentos deve obedecer ao disposto na política estabelecida pelo Conselho Nacional de
Arquivos, que deve ser observada no momento da implantação de sistemas informatizados para a
produção e gestão de documentos e processos administrativos. Nesta perspectiva, discorre sobre a
implantação de sistemas informatizados de gestão arquivística de documentos, que perpassa o
mapeamento ou modelagem de processos nas instituições, analisando o Sistema Eletrônico de
Informações (SEI) no que tange ao seu ambiente de produção de documentos e processos
administrativos perante a legislação vigente e a pertinência dos estudos sobre a gênese do documento
para garantir a produção em sistemas que façam a gestão, preservação e acesso aos documentos de
arquivo. Metodologicamente, a pesquisa se desenvolveu por meio de um estudo de caso com adoção
de questionários, estudos documentais e de instrumentos de identificação arquivística. De caráter
exploratório, apresenta a aplicação da metodologia de identificação arquivística na Coordenação de
Curso de Graduação em Arquivologia, por meio dos estudos de órgão produtor e do tipo documental
“processo de dispensa de disciplinas”, além de processo mapeado. Como resultado, vem contribuir
para as discussões sobre as metodologias para a implantação de sistemas informatizados, destacando
os resultados obtidos pela identificação arquivística para otimizar o trabalho conjunto entre
arquivistas, administradores e analistas de tecnologia da informação.




It deals with the application, in the records management scope, of the methodology of archival
identification, based on diplomatic theory, to endow the implementation of the Electronic Information
System - SEI at the Federal Fluminense University. Diplomatics is the science that studies the formal
structure of documents. The archival identification and its methodology, which involves the study of
the producer and the record type, verify the materialization of the information in the archival
documents, with the production of knowledge about the relation of these with its production context.
In the scope of the archives of the Federal Institutions of Higher Education, the records management
must comply with the established by the National Council of Archives policy, which must be observed
at the moment of computerized systems installation for the production and records management and
administrative processes. It discusses the implementation of computerized records management
systems, which encompasses the mapping or modeling of processes in institutions, as well as the need
for these systems to meet management, preservation and access requirements for digital archival
documents and their metadata. It analyzes the Electronic Information System (SEI) in relation to its
environment of production of documents and administrative processes before the current legislation
and presents pertinent concepts. Methodologically, the research was developed through a case study
using questionnaires, documentary studies and archival identification tools. With an exploratory
character, it presents the application of the methodology of archival identification in the Course
Coordination of Archives Administration, through the studies of a producer and the record type
"dispensing of disciplines process", besides a mapped process. As a result, it contributes to the
discussions on the methodologies for the implementation of computerized systems, highlighting the
results obtained by archival identification to optimize the joint work between archivists, administrators
and information technology analysts.

High-maturity software development processes, making intensive use of metrics and quantitative methods, such as the Personal Software Process (PSP) and the Team Software Process (TSP), can generate a significant amount of data that can be periodically analyzed to identify performance problems, determine their root causes and devise improvement actions. Currently, there are several tools that automate data collection and produce performance charts for manual analysis in the context of the PSP/TSP, but practically no tool support exists for automating the data analysis and the recommendation of improvement actions. Manual analysis of this performance data is problematic because of the large amount of data to analyze and the time and expertise required. Hence, we propose in this paper a performance model and a tool (named PSP PAIR) to automate the analysis of performance data produced in the context of the PSP, namely, identify performance problems and their root causes, and recommend improvement actions. The work presented is limited to the analysis of the time estimation performance of PSP developers, but is extensible to other performance indicators and development processes.

It deals with the application, in the records management scope, of the methodology of archival identification, based on diplomatic theory, to endow the implementation of the Electronic Information System - SEI at the Federal Fluminense University. Diplomatics is the science that studies the formal structure of documents. The archival identification and its methodology, which involves the study of the producer and the record type, verify the materialization of the information in the archival documents, with the production of knowledge about the relation of these with its production context. In the scope of the archives of the Federal Institutions of Higher Education, the records management must comply with the established by the National Council of Archives policy, which must be observed at the moment of computerized systems installation for the production and records management and administrative processes. It discusses the implementation of computerized records management systems, ...

Software Capability Evaluation (SCE) is a method for evaluating the software process of an organization to gain insight into its process capability, Saiedan and Kuzara (1995). SCE provides a snapshot of an organization’s past process implementation, current process activities, and future process potential, Gray and Smith, (1998). Many issues arise with the implementation of SCE in a company. No doubt SCE has its benefits and the goal of it seems attractive. However, companies that wish to adopt this method have to evaluate the pro and contra’s of it fits towards the strategic fit and strategic stretch of the company. The long term solution of software to an organization’s primary goals, objectives and mission statements are one that is often neglected and often needs to be re-evaluated by the company for lack of attention to this particular observation in SCE. Organizations also are inclined to consider the maturity of software’s capability in a longer term in order to minimize costs and productivity of the organization a notion supported and documented by CMU/SEI-94-TR-06, June 1994. In this paper, we try to bring out the issues related to this and look into recommendations as a stepping stone for a more dynamic approach to software solution selections and SCE methods. We bring forward that the implementation of SCE can be a problem, more often on a large scale than not, if not conducted in proper manner or in a timely manner. This paper also outlines out the competitive method for Software Capability Evaluation as opposed to CMM-SCE Based Assessment for Internal Process Improvement (CBA-IPI).

This chapter presents the findings from studies which address the following research questions: How do classroom teachers of ELLs view SEI policies and practices? How much information and guidance have they received, and how is SEI being implemented in their schools? How effective is SEI instruction in meeting the linguistic and academic needs of ELL students? Methods used to answer these questions include a state-wide survey of 3rd grade ELL teachers, and case studies conducted in two 3rd grade SEI classrooms.