Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-240103311
    This rubric evaluates student presentations in a class debate across 5 categories: use of facts and statistics, presentation style, organization, rebuttal of counter-arguments, and respect for the other team. For each category, students can earn a score of 1-4, with higher scores representing more effective or positive demonstration of the given category. The rubric provides descriptors of the skills and qualities associated with each score level to guide instructors in evaluation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-240103311
    15 views1 page
    This rubric evaluates student presentations in a class debate across 5 categories: use of facts and statistics, presentation style, organization, rebuttal of counter-arguments, and respect for the other team. For each category, students can earn a score of 1-4, with higher scores representing more effective or positive demonstration of the given category. The rubric provides descriptors of the skills and qualities associated with each score level to guide instructors in evaluation.

    Original Title

    rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This rubric evaluates student presentations in a class debate across 5 categories: use of facts and statistics, presentation style, organization, rebuttal of counter-arguments, and respect for the other team. For each category, students can earn a score of 1-4, with higher scores representing more effective or positive demonstration of the given category. The rubric provides descriptors of the skills and qualities associated with each score level to guide instructors in evaluation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    15 views1 page

    Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-240103311
    This rubric evaluates student presentations in a class debate across 5 categories: use of facts and statistics, presentation style, organization, rebuttal of counter-arguments, and respect for the other team. For each category, students can earn a score of 1-4, with higher scores representing more effective or positive demonstration of the given category. The rubric provides descriptors of the skills and qualities associated with each score level to guide instructors in evaluation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Class Debate Rubric !

    Category

    Student Name:__________________________

    Use of Facts/
    Statistics

    Every major point was


    well supported with
    several relevant facts,
    statistics and/or
    examples. All
    information was clear,
    accurate, and thorough
    information.

    Every major point was


    adequately supported
    with relevant facts,
    statistics and/or
    examples. Most
    information was clear,
    accurate, and thorough.

    Every major point was


    supported with facts,
    statistics and/or
    examples, but the
    relevance of some was
    questionable. Most
    information was clear
    and accurate, but not
    thorough.

    Every point was not


    supported. Information
    had several
    inaccuracies OR was
    not usually clear.

    Presentation Style

    Team consistently used


    gestures, eye contact,
    tone of voice and a
    level of enthusiasm in a
    way that kept the
    attention of the
    audience.

    Team usually used


    gestures, eye contact,
    tone of voice and a
    level of enthusiasm in a
    way that kept the
    attention of the
    audience.

    Team sometimes used


    gestures, eye contact,
    tone of voice and a
    level of enthusiasm in a
    way that kept the
    attention of the
    audience.

    One or more members


    of the team had a
    presentation style that
    did not keep the
    attention of the
    audience.

    Organization

    All arguments were


    clearly tied to an idea
    (premise) and
    organized in a tight,
    logical fashion.

    Most arguments were


    clearly tied to an idea
    (premise) and
    organized in a tight,
    logical fashion.

    All arguments were


    clearly tied to an idea
    (premise) but the
    organization was
    sometimes not clear or
    logical.

    Arguments were not


    clearly tied to an idea
    (premise).

    Rebuttal

    All counter-arguments
    were accurate, relevant
    and strong.

    Most counterarguments were


    accurate, relevant, and
    strong.

    Most counterarguments were


    accurate and relevant,
    but several were weak.

    Counter-arguments
    were not accurate and/
    or relevant

    Respect for Other


    Team

    All statements, body


    language, and
    responses were
    respectful and were in
    appropriate language.

    Statements and
    responses were
    respectful and used
    appropriate language,
    but once or twice body
    language was not.

    Most statements and


    responses were
    respectful and in
    appropriate language,
    but there was one
    sarcastic remark.

    Statements, responses
    and/or body language
    were consistently not
    respectful.

    You might also like