DIRANA Application Guide - Measuring and Analyzing Power Transformers
DIRANA Application Guide - Measuring and Analyzing Power Transformers
DIRANA Application Guide - Measuring and Analyzing Power Transformers
Application Guide
Measuring and Analyzing the Dielectric
Response of a Power Transformer
2/33
Contents
1 Using This Document ............................................................................................................ 5
1.1 Operator Qualifications and Safety Standards ................................................................... 5
1.2 Safety Measures................................................................................................................ 5
1.3 Related Documents ........................................................................................................... 5
2 Preparing the Transformer .................................................................................................... 6
2.1 Disconnection from the Network ........................................................................................ 6
2.2 Gathering Transformer Data .............................................................................................. 6
2.2.1 Insulation Temperature................................................................................................. 6
2.2.2 Nameplate Data ........................................................................................................... 7
2.2.3 Oil Tests....................................................................................................................... 8
2.2.4 Environmental Conditions............................................................................................. 9
2.2.5 Other Information ......................................................................................................... 9
3 Connecting DIRANA to the Transformer .............................................................................. 9
3.1 Basic Measurement Circuit Guarding Principle ............................................................... 9
3.2 General Procedure .......................................................................................................... 10
3.3 Wiring Diagram for Various Winding Set-Ups .................................................................. 12
3.3.1 Two Winding Transformer .......................................................................................... 12
3.3.2 Three Winding Transformer........................................................................................ 12
3.3.3 Autotransformer.......................................................................................................... 13
3.3.4 Shunt Reactor ............................................................................................................ 13
3.4 Which HV Devices Can Be Left Connected? ................................................................... 14
4 Setting Up the Software....................................................................................................... 16
5 Performing the Measurement.............................................................................................. 18
5.1 Development of the Dissipation Factor Curve .................................................................. 18
5.2 Measurement Errors ........................................................................................................ 19
6 Interpreting the Dielectric Response in Frequency Domain ............................................. 21
7 Moisture Analysis Using DIRANA....................................................................................... 24
7.1 Principle of Moisture Analysis .......................................................................................... 24
7.2 Step by Step Guide for Moisture Analysis ........................................................................ 25
7.3 Analysis of a Measurement with Limited Frequency Range ............................................. 27
3/33
4/33
IEEE 510 "Recommended Practices for Safety in High-Voltage and High-Power Testing"
Moreover, additional relevant laws and internal safety standards have to be followed.
Description
5/33
Top winding
Hot spot
Top oil
72C
Average
oil
92C
98C
Cooling
system
Average
winding
83C
63C
Figure 1: Exemple of
Ambient
20C
Bottom oil
temperature distribution in
54C
74C
Bottom winding
6/33
7/33
voltage ratio help to check the consistency of the subsequent moisture analysis. Taking a
photograph of the nameplate, again, helps in the documentation process.
2.2.3 Oil Tests
The Operators of power transformers depend heavily on the periodic sampling of the oil. The
screening consists of several parameters that are of particular interest with regard to the dielectric
response measurement:
Acidity
High acidity reflects paper and oil aging and often increases the oil conductivity. It takes a
certain quantity of an alkaline material to neutralize these acids. A standard method that is
used to find this quantity neutralization number, is to mix potassium hydroxide (KOH) with
the acid/oil until it is neutralized, and is measured in milligrams of KOH per gram of oil.
[ASTM D974, D664, D1534]. New oils have an acidity below 0.05 mg KOH / g oil. It
increases with aging to 0.5 and above. The conductivity of oil is influenced by acids and
given in Siemens per meter, that is S / m or 1/ / m. New oils have around 0.05 pS/m and a
conductivity of above 20 pS/m at ambient temperature points on a progressed aging state.
Water in oil
Since the water content in oil in ppm strictly depends on temperature, no levels of permitted
moisture concentration based on ppm can be given. By applying the water content in oil
(ppm) and the sampling temperature (C) to a moisture equilibrium diagram (Figure 3) a
very rough estimation of moisture content in paper can be made. Since aging of oil and
paper shifts the equilibrium curves, this method overestimates moisture in paper. This
especially applies if the acidity and / or oil conductivity are high. To overcome the influence
of oil aging, water saturation in oil (%) instead of water content in oil (ppm) can be used [3].
Moisture in cellulose / %
20
50
80
5
0C
20C
30C
40C
4
260
60C
500
80C
880
100C
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
8/33
6
5
4
3
21C
2
40C
60C
80C
0
0
10
20
30
40
Moisture relative to saturation / %
9/33
ISur
IVol
Insulation
under test
ISur
IVol
Insulation
under test
ISur
A
IVol + ISur
IVol
Figure 5: A dielectric response measurement without guarding (left) and with guarding (right)
Figure 6 illustrates the guarding principle for a power transformer. Here the currents over dirty
bushings will not be measured by the instrument. Additionally, the transformer tank and the
Instrument
=
A
Current sense 1
IVol
ISur
ISur
Guard
CL
CHL
LV
IVol
CH
HV
10/33
2. Next, connect all HV bushings to each other. Do the same for all LV bushings.
3. After this, connect the cable for the voltage output (yellow) to the HV bushings and the
cable for the input channel (red) to the LV bushings.
4. Connect the guard of both measurement cables to the transformer tank. Insure a good
connection, avoid lacquered surfaces or corroded metal.
11/33
Output
CH1
A
CH2
CHL
CL
CH
Output
V
CH1
A
CH2
CLT
CHL
CHT
dual channel mode
CH1: UST-A CHL - Measurement of the insulation LV- HV
CH2: UST-B CLT - Measurement of the insulation LV- TV
CT
CL
CH
12/33
3.3.3 Autotransformer
For an autotransformer, the measurement voltage should be connected to the (internally
connected) HV and LV winding and the input channel to the tertiary winding. In case, the tertiary
winding cannot be reached, use the same connection as for the shunt reactor, p. 13.
Output
V
CH1
A
CH2
A
CHT
CT
CH
13/33
Output
CH1
A
CH
CH2
Figure 10: Measurement set-up for a shunt reactor or an autotransformer without tertiary winding
Disconnect voltage transformers and neutral point impedances as they cause a short circuit
to ground.
Avoid overloading of the instrument due to high currents, e.g. long cables.
The still-connected devices should have low capacitances and losses compared to the
transformer insulation; otherwise high guard currents may cause a negative dissipation
factor (p. 19).
Avoid electromagnetic field coupling since the still-connected devices might act as
antennas.
14/33
If these requirements are fulfilled, the instrument can attain the same accuracy as that of a
complete disconnection. Figure 11 illustrates the effect of a still connected HV device CExt which is
connected to ground / guard.
Voltage source
~
Current input
A
Guard/
Ground
CT
CLT
CHL
CH
CExt
LV
MV
HV
still connected
A
Voltage source
~
Guard
CT
CLT
CHL
CH
CExt
Ground
LV
MV
HV
Voltage transformers
15/33
Short PE cables
3. By clicking the drop-down-list, choose the configuration that fits to your measurement
specimen. You may also refer to the corresponding wiring diagram in order to connect
DIRANA to the transformer.
4. Click the settings tab and then enter 100 Hz as stop frequency. The section below will
explain the required frequency ranges.
5. After this, close the dialog field "Configure Measurement" by clicking on "OK".
16/33
Dissipation factor
high
1
low
insulation
geometry
0,1
high
low
0,01
high
oil
conductivity
low
0,001
0,001
0,01
100
1000
Frequency [Hz]
The position of the area influenced by moisture in cellulose and, consequently, the frequency
range required for the specific insulation depends on the condition of the insulation. Dry or cold
insulations require measuring down to very low frequencies, i.e. 100 Hz. For hot or highly
conductive insulations, the stop frequency can be much higher; e.g. 0.1 Hz.
As the condition of the transformer to be measured is unknown in most cases, set the stop
frequency to the lowest value, i.e. 100 Hz. Then, observe the dissipation factor curve during the
measurement and stop the measurement when the "hump" and the point of inflexion on its lefthand side appear. See also the measurement example below.
Note that for elevated temperatures the "hump" will not be as distinct as in Figure 13. The
dissipation factor trace does not show such a clear local maximum, but rather, a slight point of
inflexion (Figure 24).
17/33
cables since the piezoelectric effect may cause disturbing charges. The dissipation factor curve will
appear, starting at the high frequencies, and developing toward the low frequencies.
During the measurement, DIRANA can be disconnected from the computer and the measurement
will continue offline. After reconnection to the computer, the measurement results are loaded into
the DIRANA software and displayed in the graphical view pane.
18/33
The measurement can be stopped when the "hump" and the point of inflexion on its left-hand side
are measured; please refer to the explanations for Figure 13.
If capacitive currents cause an overload (typical for long cables), decrease the output
voltage or start the measurement at lower frequencies than 1000 Hz; i.e. at 100 Hz.
Input Overflow
In case the software displays an input overflow error, check that the transformer and the DIRANA
have the same reference potential. Usually this error appears when the transformer tank is on a
floating potential. Connect the transformer tank to the ground terminal on the rear panel of the
DIRANA (p. 10).
Negative Dissipation Factor
The dissipation factor curve may turn negative at high frequencies, see Figure 17. Reasons for this
problem may be at first a high guard impedance, at second a small measured capacitance in
conjunction with a large guard capacitance, at third high guard currents (dirty bushings) and at
fourth the inductivity of coils.
DF
1.000
0.500
CHL
0.100
0.050
0.0100
0.005
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
f/Hz
Connect all guards of measurement cables and if possible an additional wire from the
triaxial connectors at the DIRANA front plate to the transformer tank.
19/33
Try to decrease the guard currents (clean bushings, disconnect all devices which are
possibly still connected to the transformer).
Ensure a proper connection of the DIRANA housing to the reference potential, usually the
transformer tank.
0.010
0.007
0.0001
0.0010
0.0100
0.1000
1.0000
10.0000
100.0000
f/Hz
Depolarize the dielectric by connecting the terminals of the HV and the LV bushings to each
over and to the transformer tank. The depolarization time should be at least as long as the
polarization time (duration, for which the voltage was applied), however this also depends
on the applied voltage. After this, the DIRANA measurement can be repeated.
Measure the dielectric response using DIRANA at first prior to the resistance test of the
dielectric.
20/33
disturbances in dissipation factor for the low frequencies. Generally, the disturbances in time
domain will appear in frequency domain depending on their frequency spectrum.
DF
I/A
HV+LV to tank
HV+LV to tank
0.0000030
2.000
0.0000020
1.000
0.500
0.200
0.0000010
0.100
0.0000007
0.050
0.0000005
0.020
2
10
20
50
100
200
500 1000
t/s
0.0010
0.0100
0.1000
1.0000
10.0000
f/Hz
Figure 19: Time domain current with disturbances at around 1000 s (left) and its transformation in
frequency domain with disturbances at the low frequencies (right). The reason for the disturbances was
that guarding was not applicable for this CL-measurement.
21/33
0.200
2%
0.100
0.050
1%
0.020
0.010
0.005
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.0
10.0
100
f/Hz
Figure 21 shows the dissipation factor of only oil with a conductivity of 1 pS/m measured at 20C.
Note, that the losses are much higher as for pressboard and that the dissipation factor is just a line
with a slope of 20 dB / decade.
DF
10.0
1.00
0.10
0.01
0.001
0.0001
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.00
10.00
100.00
f/Hz
The dielectric properties of pressboard and oil are superimposed together with interfacial
polarization. Interfacial polarization is typical for non-homogeneous dielectrics with different
permittivity or conductivity. Here charge carriers such as ions accumulate at the interfaces, forming
clouds with a dipole-like behavior. This kind of polarization is effective only somewhere below ten
Hertz.
22/33
Pressboard
Oil
conductivity
Insulation
Geometry
Pressboard
0.30
0.10
0.03
0.01
DF
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
100.000
f/Hz
(insulation geometry)
Figure 22 displays the dissipation factor of pressboard having 1 % moisture content and oil
together with the interfacial polarization effect (insulation geometry). The insulation geometry (ratio
of oil to pressboard) determines the interfacial polarization effect. The frequency range of 100010 Hz is dominated by the pressboard. Oil conductivity causes the steep slope at 1-0.01 Hz. The
interfacial polarization (insulation geometry) determines the local maximum or "hump" at 0.003 Hz.
Finally, the properties of pressboard appear again at the frequencies below 0.0005 Hz. The
frequency limits correspond to Figure 22, but will vary in a wide range with moisture, oil
conductivity, temperature and amount of conductive aging by-products.
Moisture especially increases the losses in the low frequency range of the dielectric response of
pressboard. Thus, data on the left-hand side of the area dominated by interfacial polarization
(insulation geometry) are required for a reliable moisture determination. The point of inflexion on
the left hand side of the area dominated by insulation geometry must be reached.
Since pressboard also dominates the high frequency area above 10 Hz in Figure 22, it might
appear that it is sufficient to measure this frequency range. However, moisture especially affects
the low frequency branch of the dissipation factor curve. Figure 20 illustrates, that the high
frequency part of the dissipation factor curve is very similar for different moisture contents, but the
low frequency part differs. Consequently, if the measurement range is restricted to the high
frequencies, the accuracy of water determination will be very low allowing only for a rough
discrimination between wet and dry.
If geometry data of the transformer are known, it is not necessary to measure down to these low
frequencies. For example, for Figure 22, the measurement could be stopped at 0.001 Hz.
Influence of Moisture and Temperature
For increasing moisture content and oil conductivity, the curve shifts toward higher frequencies, but
the shape remains similar. Figure 23 depicts the dissipation factor over frequency for 3 % moisture
content and 10 pS/m oil conductivity. Figure 24 illustrates the influence of temperature on the same
23/33
insulation system. At 50C the losses of pressboard along with the oil conductivity increase while
the shape of the curve remains similar.
DF
1.00
0.20
0.10
0.01
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
100.00
f/Hz
DF
10.00
5.00
1.00
0.50
0.10
0.05
0.01
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.00
100.00
f/Hz
43 pS/m
For the measurement as shown in Figure 23, sufficient data for subsequent moisture analysis was
available at 0.0021 Hz, corresponding to a measurement time of 14 minutes. At this frequency the
only properties of pressboard appear, which is the prerequisite for accurate moisture analysis.
Finally, for the elevated temperature of 50C of Figure 24, the measurement could have been
stopped at 0.01 Hz.
24/33
Measurement
Data base
Temperature
Oil
XY-model
Comparison
DF
moisture content,
oil conductivity
1.00
0.50
0.20
0.10
0.05
0.02
0.01
0.005
f/Hz
0.01
44C
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.0
Model Curve
2. Enter Variables
For
temperature
temperature
into
compensation,
the
type
corresponding
the
field.
insulation
For
this
The oil conductivity will also be calculated automatically. If the oil conductivity is known, it can be
entered taking into account the measurement temperature. Using the "Enter Conductivity at
Different Temp." button, the conductivity can be recalculated to the insulation temperature.
25/33
In this example, the automatic curve fitting gives the result of 1.7 % moisture content, 9.3 pS/m oil
conductivity, 20 % barriers and 14 % spacers.
4. Optimizing the Moisture Analysis by Hand
As the low frequencies on the left-hand side of the "hump" reflect moisture, a good fitting of this
area should be observed. In this respect, Figure 26 leaves some room for improvements. Since
insulation geometry causes the hump, decreasing the amount of barriers to 12 % gives a better
fitting of this area. Consequently, the moisture content must be adjusted to 1.5 %.
The automatic assessment gave a different result than the optimization by hand because the lower
limit for barriers was set to 20 %. By setting the limit for barriers to 10 % in the "Advanced Limits
for Automatic Assessment" tab, the automatic assessment comes to the same result as the
optimization by hand.
26/33
0.200
0.100
0.050
0.020
0.010
0.005
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.0
100.0
f/Hz
To analyze such a measurement, some estimation of the geometric conditions will help. Set the
geometry condition to fixed values of X = 30 % and Y = 20 %. The amount of barriers to oil X
typically ranges from 15 to 55 % and of spacers Y from 13 to 24 %. Usually, older transformers
contain a higher ratio of pressboard to oil (Figure 29). To estimate the ratio of solid to liquid
insulation, one may also look at the high frequencies of 100-1000 Hz.
After this, perform the automatic assessment and, if necessary, some optimization by hand as
described above. For the example of Figure 28, the assessment result is then depicted in Figure
30.
27/33
Barriers X in %
70
60
50
22 kV
110 kV
65 kV
220 kV
400 kV
500 kV
autotransformer
40
30
20
10
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
Year of manufacture
depending on year of
manufacture.
Moisture content in %
Dry
below 2,2
Moderately wet
2,2-3,7
Wet
3,7-4,8
Extremely wet
above 4,8
Color
28/33
IEC 60422 provides categories for moisture contamination of power transformers based on
moisture saturation. Moisture saturation can be converted into moisture content using sorption
isotherms (Figure 31). The IEC rates moisture saturations of more than 6 % as "moderately wet",
which is equivalent to a moisture content of approximately 2.2 %. In this area the water molecules
become more and more active, increasing the dangerous effects of water. At this level,
maintenance actions such as drying should be considered, taking into account the importance and
future operation of the transformer. Figure 31 shows the relationship between moisture content and
moisture saturation and illustrates the categories of IEC 60422 in order to assess the results
analyzed by DIRANA.
5
C
2 1
C
80
4
3
2
on
e
ur nati
t
s
i
i
Mo ntam
co
Moderately
wet
Wet,
> 30 %
extremely
wet
Figure 31: Moisture sorption isotherm for a
Dry
0
10
20
30
Moisture saturation [%]
29/33
On-Line Drying
Here on-line drying systems dry the oil through continuous circulation. The transformer can be left
in service and the oil will regain its dielectric withstand strength very quickly. As the oil contains
only a very small amount of water, typically half of 1 % of all the water in the transformer, this
method of drying the solid insulation will take the long time of months up to years. Additionally,
there is a risk that the inhibitors in the oil may be inadvertently removed.
DIRANA can validate the efficiency of drying methods. Drying methods will at first affect the outer
layers of the cellulose insulation and thus cause an inhomogeneous moisture distribution. In order
to obtain a more realistic moisture distribution for moisture analysis by DIRANA, the transformer
should be in operation and reach at least a top oil temperature of 50C. This procedure causes a
homogenous moisture distribution and a reliable moisture analysis result.
Measurement data on the left-hand side of the "hump" are available (Figure 22). This
makes the analysis independent from the geometric setup and the oil conductivity of the
specific insulation. The software will calculate the insulation geometry; the user doesn't
have to enter the data.
No "direct" oil connection between the windings, at least one winding must be fully covered
with paper/pressboard. This condition is surely fulfilled at voltages above 20 kV. In the other
case the large influence of the oil gap might hide the properties of pressboard and paper. If
this occurs, the dissipation factor curve will not have the specific shape of Figure 22.
30/33
Low temperature:
Temperatures below 10C involve the problems of a reliable temperature measurement and
of the temperature dependent behavior of the cellulose materials used in the particular
transformer.
Sampling procedure
During paper sampling and transportation to the laboratory, moisture from the atmosphere
easily increases the moisture content of the sample. A few minutes of exposure to air
31/33
makes the test useless. Therefore the sampling conditions may lead to an overestimation of
moisture content.
Sample position
The temperature distribution inside a power transformer causes a moisture distribution. The
cold insulation structures (construction elements) accumulate water and the hot structures
(winding paper) are drier. DIRANA will indicate an average moisture content of the barriers
and spacers operated at oil temperature and the winding paper.
support@omicron.at
Phone: +43 5523-507-333
Fax: +43 5523-507-7333
techsupport@omicronusa.com
Phone: +1 713 830-4660 or 1 800 OMICRON
Fax: +1 713 830+4661
Asia/Pacific
support@asia.omicron.at
Phone: +852 2634 0377
Fax: +852 2634 0390
9 Literature
[1] T. V. Oommen: Moisture Equilibrium Charts for Transformer Insulation Drying Practice
IEEE Transaction on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-103, No. 10, Oct. 1984, pp.
3063-3067.
[2] M. Koch, S. Tenbohlen, D. Giselbrecht, C. Homagk, T. Leibfried: Onsite, Online and Post
Mortem Insulation Diagnostics at Power Transformers, Cigr SC A2 & D1 Colloquium,
Brugge, Belgium 2007
32/33
33/33