Ella 1
Ella 1
Ella 1
ELLA
Extended Live Load Analysis
ELLA Manual, Version 2016-0
Software Version SOFiSTiK 2016
c 2015 by SOFiSTiK AG, Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Copyright
SOFiSTiK AG
HQ Oberschleissheim
Bruckmannring 38
85764 Oberschleissheim
Germany
Office Nuremberg
Burgschmietstr. 40
90419 Nuremberg
Germany
Front Cover
Project: MILANEO, Stuttgart, Germany | Client: Bayerische Hausbau and ECE | Architect: RKW Rhode Kellermann Wawrowsky
| Structural Engineering for Bayerische Hausbau: Boll und Partner | Photo: Dirk Mnzner
Contents | ELLA
Contents
Contents
Task Description
1-1
Theoretical Principles
2.1
Bending Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2
Unit Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3
Load Introduction in Lanes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.4
Interpolation of the Influence Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.5
Transverse Influence Lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.6
Evaluation of the Influence Lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.6.1
Favourably and Unfavourably Performing Loads .
2.6.2
Unfavourable Load Position . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.7
Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2-1
2-1
2-1
2-1
2-3
2-6
2-7
2-7
2-8
2-9
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3-1
3-1
3-2
3-4
3-5
3-6
3-7
3-9
3-13
3-15
3-16
3-18
3-20
3-21
3-23
3-24
3-33
3-34
3-38
3-40
3-41
Input Description
3.1
Input Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2
Input Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3
ECHO Control of the Output Extent . . . . . . . . .
3.4
CTRL Control Parameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.5
Definition of the Lane Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.6
GAX Geometry of an Axis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.7
LANE Width of Traffic Lanes . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.8
LSEL Selection of a Defined Lane . . . . . . . . .
3.9
Calculation of Influence Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.10 CALC Evaluation of Influence Areas . . . . . . . .
3.11 LINF Influence Lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.12 APPL Control of the Loading Location . . . . . . .
3.13 SIZE Graphic Representation of Influence Lines
3.14 SHOW Representation of Influence Lines . . . .
3.15 ACT Definition of an Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.16 LC Train Load Loading Case . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.17 TRAI Load Train Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.17.1 Impact Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.17.2 Centrifugal Forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.17.3 Load Trains according to Eurocode . . . .
SOFiSTiK 2016
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
ELLA | Contents
3.18
3.19
3.20
3.21
3.22
3.23
4
ii
Output Description
4.1
Lane Geometry . . . . . . . . .
4.2
Influence Lines . . . . . . . . .
4.3
Load Trains . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.4
Superposition Combinations
4.5
Evaluation Results . . . . . . .
4.6
Program Statistics . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3-50
3-52
3-54
3-56
3-57
3-58
3-59
3-59
3-61
3-62
3-69
3-70
3-73
3-75
3-76
3-78
3-82
.
.
.
.
.
.
4-1
4-1
4-1
4-2
4-3
4-4
4-4
SOFiSTiK 2016
Task Description
ELLA is a program for the analysis and evaluation of imposed loads that acts
on spatial beam or shell structures in the form of load trains which move along
certain traffic lanes. The envelopes of the scalar variables for the entire structure are usually the result. In the case of simple statical systems and simple
load cases a traditional analysis of the system can be faster for a large number
of imposed load cases under circumstances. The evaluation of influence lines
or influence surfaces becomes necessary for an accurate analysis of larger systems, as they are usual particularly in the bridge construction. It is not so simple
to determine either the most unfavourable load position or the used parts of a
load in order to maximize the certain internal forces for important parts of the
structure outside its midspan. In addition, different load positions are critical for
the different internal forces and moments. The evaluation of the influence lines
reduces the extent of the input very significantly.
The entire surface of a structure at which imposed loads act gets divided into
straight or curved lanes of variable width. Any load trains can be assigned to
each lane. They can move independently or in relation to each other. The traffic
lanes are defined with axes which may contain circular segments or clothoids.
The loading refers always to the lane axis. An influence line is generated for
a vertical loading along the lanes axis for each lane as well as for a moment
loading about the same axis due to the eccentrical parts. Additional influence
lines for brake or centrifugal loading can be considered upon request.
The program evaluates influence lines only for corresponding traffic lanes even
in the case of plane structures. However, a satisfactory representation of the
two-dimensional effects can be achieved for the available element distribution
by partitioning the structure into multiple lanes. The influence surfaces can be
either transferred from the database or determined as a rule with a calculation
with an own static module of the influence line program.
In the second case, however, all the single element stiffnesses as well as the
stiffness matrix of the entire structure must be available. This requires that at
least one load case has been analysed with the programs ASE or STAR2 with
option CTRL SOLV 1 or 3, and the corresponding data is still available. Load
cases with settlement of support or non-linear load cases are not suitable for
this.
SOFiSTiK 2016
1-1
1-2
SOFiSTiK 2016
2
2.1
Theoretical Principles
Bending Areas
Influence lines can be calculated with two completely different methods. The first
method determines the deformations (e.g. bending line) due to an unit deformation for the searched internal force (e.g. a break for a moment). The bending
area is the result of a static analysis with an appropriate program. A load case
defines always one influence area. Corresponding areas are own load cases in
each case. This method should be preferred when only a few influence areas or
particular variables are to be calculated (e.g. support reactions, deformations or
sums of scalar variables).
When a large number of influence lines of the structure has to be calculated with
this method, an own load case will have to be analysed for each cross section
and for each internal force. This procedure exceeds usually the available CPU
time and memory capacities of the static programs.
2.2
Unit Loads
The second method works in opposite manner. A unit load is defined at each position (node or member cross section). The analysis determines all the other corresponding internal forces. The main advantage of this method is that the single
loads do not have to be applied at every loading location. The missing intermediate values can be calculated easily with an interpolation, if the known discontinuities at loading location (break, jump) are considered additionally. Therefore,
the number of load cases to be analysed can be reduced significantly.
In the case of plane structures the discontinuity is defined by means of a singularity. This singularity does not result from a finite element analysis in principal.
However we have a smooth approximate influence function which may be used
to derive the principal problem of precision in a Finite-Element-Analysis very
clearly (see Hartmann/Katz - Structural Analysis with Finite Elements, Springer).
This should be considered particularly in the case of shear forces!
2.3
The loaded traffic area is defined by lanes with constant width and a residual
area. Loads will be defined within a lane, but can move arbitrarily along the lane
and in many cases also across the lane.
In order to accelerate the evaluation, the loads are simplified within a lane by
SOFiSTiK 2016
2-1
a vertical loading and a torsional moment due to the eccentric position of the
vertical load. Thus the description by means of an eccentric lane or an eccentric
load is equivalent for single loads.
Most of the standard road loadings are
internally partitioned into loads at the left-hand side and at the right-hand side
of the shear centre. The location of which is automatically determined from the
influence values for torsional and vertical loading.
In the case of two girders and articulated load distribution the result is the same,
if the loading is placed centrically at lane 1 or eccentric with respect to lane 2.
The eccentricity moment offers the necessary correction for the distribution of
the loading at the longitudinal girders:
However, great differences are already available in this case for rigid load dis2-2
SOFiSTiK 2016
Lane 1
Lane 2
Lane 1:
Lane 2:
2.4
When the lane axis does not coincide with the defined nodes, the values of the
influence line must be interpolated. The program searches then for two series
of nodes in the direct vicinity of the lane and interpolates perpendicularly to its
SOFiSTiK 2016
2-3
moment M
load P
resulting force
2-4
SOFiSTiK 2016
axis.
The selection of a neighboring node series is trivial for plane structures. For
girders, however, it is in general a problem for the artificial intelligence. It is
extremely difficult for a program to develop the human ability of the general
overview. Therefore, this part of the program can not execute in a uniquely determined way. A specific constellation not being recognized correctly can occur
again and again. The user must take a proper action in such cases by defining
a sequence of nodes or beam elements.
For the interpolation perpendicularly to the lane axis a distinction must be done
very exactly between three variations that result from different types of the load
distribution:
INT = 0
Single lane
INT = 1
Articulated
load distribution
INT = 2
Rigid
load distribution
SOFiSTiK 2016
2-5
In the third case (INT 2) torsional moments result additionally from the fixed
constraint of the deck slab.
Following the inverse principle of influence lines it is also possible to view the
different methods as different interpolation grades of the transverse influence
line as shown in the following picture:
INT 1
INT 0
INT 2
2.5
For plate and shell structures this interpolation of the lane values may become
insufficient as local effects of the loads have to be neglected. If the use of
multiple synchronized lanes is not applicable the types 3,5,7 or 9 will create this
number of load points transverse to the lane.
In a first step the transverse influence line will be established, followed by an
immediate evaluation of the maximum effects for a uniform loading and a single axle with two wheels with a given distance. The obtained values will then
become the values of the longitudinal influence line at this position.
There are two problems to be dealt: First it might be possible that the extreme
2-6
SOFiSTiK 2016
load position is not the same for the maximum vertical effect and the maximum
torsional effect (e.g. wind). This is neglected by using the most adverse effect in
all cases.
The second problem is that we will have positive and negative influence lines
across the lane. While this is handled most accurately for the uniform loading
by integrating the contributions separately, the axle load will be applied always
with both wheels and only with is dominating contribution. It is therefore recommended not to place lanes centrically on the main girder, but eccentric at the
true position.
2.6
2.6.1
Since each load may use more than one influence line at the same time, a
quick evaluation of influence lines is possible only if some assumptions are made
about the load positions. ELLA uses also deductional loads, i.e. negative loads,
which describe gaps within an uniform traffic band.
Loads of the load trains are thus considered unfavourable, when a load in the
positive gravity direction (downwards) with the same eccentricity at the corresponding point of the influence line would also act unfavourably. Loads that act
at regions of the influence line with an opposite sign are considered favourable.
This classification decides about the appropriate dynamic factors, the possible
use of the reduction factors, and whether the load should be taken into account
at all. Horizontal loading will not be included in this decision. However all load
directions are considered for the determination of the most unfavourable load
SOFiSTiK 2016
2-7
If the brake load is taken over the total length in the same direction, the
contributions will cancel mostly. This kind of loading should be defined as
standard load case, but not within ELLA.
If the load train has a dedicated travelling direction, only those contributions
will be taken into account acting unfavourably, although the design code (e.g.
Eurocode) may define the load value by the total, but limited loading in the
lane and an overall loaded length. A modification of the load value depending
on the loaded length will not occur.
If the load train is allowed to travel in any direction, all contributions will be
summed up with their unfavourable sign. Thus the areas with the wrong
sign will either have traffic in the opposite direction or acceleration forces are
effective. Although the Eurocode specifies this possibility only for the total
load value, this approach will also compensate for the missing effect of the
adoption of the load value to the loaded length from the remark above.
2.6.2
For the load trains there are cases where the load train should be applied in total
only or where parts of the load train may be deactivated. This will be controlled
2-8
SOFiSTiK 2016
by a factor for favorable loading for every load element. The distinction between
the cases of a loading which is always present (e.g. cranes) and those where
the load may leave the system may not be decided in ELLA with ultimate precission. But as the resulting forces and moments have to be superimposed with
permanent loads, this decision may be postponed until then.
The most unfavourable load position is sought with a two-stage method. In a
first step the load train is placed at selected positions which either the program
selects itself or the user prescribes with POSL. Variable lengths or convoys of
loading are estimated separately with a simple method. The lengths of the positive loads are set always equal to their maximum value, whereas negative loads
are placed in such a way that their influence value at the end of the load is the
largest possible.
In a second step the most unfavourable value of all analyzed positions keeps on
being examined for local extreme values. That means the load train positions
and all lengths are varied until the most unfavourable position is found.
2.7
Limits
Some limits must be satisfied when using the program. The load direction
of all load trains is always in the direction of the gravity. The application of
ELLA for plane frames or shear walls provides so many possibilities for missunderstandings, that we do not support this feature currently.
coordinate system
right-handed
9999
unlimited
99
unlimited
The program uses a working memory which is used mainly for the storage of the
values needed for the influence lines. An analytical equation for the necessary
memory can not be given, yet the in fact used area can be printed with ECHO
STAT.
The program is executed mostly in a uniquely determined way. There are, however, two types of problems for which a unique solution does not exist or can not
be found by the program under circumstances. These are:
SOFiSTiK 2016
2-9
The algorithm for the selection of the nodes next to the lane It is to be expected that unexpected results arise at irregularities (e.g. kinematic constraints, double defined beam members etc.).
Load trains with variable length In the case of load trains with loads of variable length the whole problem may become very complex. One should use
so few changeable lengths as possible. In addition the user should define
first the lengths which have the most significant effects. In the case of doubt
it is better to define more evaluation cases with fixed load lengths.
2-10
SOFiSTiK 2016
Input Description
3.1
Input Language
The input is made in the CADINP language (see general manual SOFiSTiK:
FEA / STRUCTURAL Installation and Basics).
The geometric and statical model must have been already defined and stored in
the database. The geometric definitions of the lanes may be already available
in the database.
The input is articulated in blocks which are decollated with the record END.
Within every block one can:
The influence lines and load positions remain stored in a separate database
(.CDI) and are available for further evaluations.
The program is ended, when an empty block (END/END) occurs.
Three categories of units are distinguished:
mm
[mm]
[mm] 1011
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-1
by a corresponding identity number (shown in green). Valid categories referring to the unit length are, for example, geodetic
elevation, section length and thickness. The default unit for each
category is defined by the currently active (design code specific)
unit set. This input default can be overridden as described above.
The specified unit in square brackets corresponds to the default for
unit set 5 (Eurocodes, NORM UNIT 5).
3.2
Input Records
Items
ECHO
TYPE
VAL
CTRL
OPT
VAL
GAX
NO
NX
NY
NZ
TYPE
TITL
NO
TYPE
SA
SE
YCE
YRA
YLA
NO
INT
LSEL
LSEQ
CALC
TYPE
LINF
WR
WL
YCA
YRE
YLE
DX
DY
DZ
RSEL
RSEQ
LMAX
LMIN
FROM
TO
DELT
SYST
T1
L1
T2
L2
T3
L3
T4
L4
T5
L5
T6
L6
TITL
APPL
TYPE
TGEN
SIZE
TYPE
SC
MARG
FORM
HDIV
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
SHOW
SNO
TYPE
NO
ETYP
DSV
YMAX
ACT
TYPE
GAMU
GAMF
PSI0
PSI1
PSI2
PS1S
PART
SUP
TITL
NO
PSI0
PSI1
PSI2
PS1S
GAMU
GAMF
TYPE
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
P9
PFAC
WIDT
PHI
PHI2
PHIS
PHI4
XCON
DIR
LANE
LSEL
LC
TITL
TRAI
FUGA
3-2
SOFiSTiK 2016
Record
Items
DIRT
TRPL
PB
PW
PF
PFAC
DIST
DPOS
DMIN
DMAX
Y2
HW
ZW
HF
PHI
PB
PW
PF
PFAC
DIST
LMAX
LDEL
Y2
HW
ZW
HF
PHI
SAVE
LCB
TYPE
TITL
CASE
NO
GRP
POSL
NO
TRAI
FACT
OPT
SMIN
SMAX
DEL
SYNC
TYPE
L1
F1
L2
F2
L3
F3
L4
F4
L5
F5
L6
F6
L7
F7
L9
F9
L10
F10
TRBL
YEX
COMB
L8
F8
The records HEAD, END and PAGE are described in the general manual
SOFiSTiK: FEA / STRUCTURAL Installation and Basics.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-3
3.3
ECHO
Item
Description
Unit
Default
OPT
LT
FULL
LT
FULL
FULL
STAT
VAL
The record name ECHO must be input for every record so that the options are
not confused with other records with identical names. The volume of printed
data is also controlled with the record SHOW.
With ECHO IL the influence lines will be printed, in general as pictures, but with
option EXTR also as text. The small influence lines in transverse direction will
be shown with the Option +4. Without a SHOW selection the volume of pictures
may become quite large.
With the option LPOS the actual load positions of all evaluations will be saved
to the database and the graphical visualization of the influence lines will include
the loading and will be repeated for all evaluation cases.
ECHO EVAL YES prints only the generated load cases for the case of ECHO
RES NO. For the load train position ECHO EVAL FULL is needed and for the
detailed statistical data ECHO EVAL EXTR.
ECHO RES EXTR prints the intermediate results of all cases.
3-4
SOFiSTiK 2016
3.4
CTRL
Item
Description
Unit
Default
OPT
LT
VAL
Value of Option
V2
V3
V4
V5
V6
With CTRL SECT one can obtain evaluations only at certain beam sections. The
input options are:
CTRL SECT 0
CTRL SECT 1
With CTRL AGRL one can select how ELLA should cope with the aggregation
of loaded lengths. The load values as well as the impact factors may depend on
those values.
STEU AGRL 0
STEU AGRL 1
STEU AGRL 2
It has to be pointed out, that option 0 will be not be general applicable in case
of elastic supports, where strong discontinuities in the results may be obtained
and thus is not a mechanically sound procedure.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-5
3.5
The base of the moving load process is a lane geometry, described in the plan
view by straight, circular or clothoid segments and in the elevation as straight
or quadratic parabola. This can be taken from the database as defined by
SOFiMSHC or SOFILOAD or explicitly input with the record GAX. Each axis
may have up to nine separate lanes with the sub numbers 1 to 9 defined via
LANE. For the dynamic impact coefficients an effective length may be specified
and the extra width of the traffic area may be defined.
A lane axis already stored in the database (by SOFiMSHC or SOFiLOAD or
ELLA) can be activated with the record LSEL.
Each lane has two coordinate systems. There is a local system (x) at the lane
axis for real distances. However, the inputs for the positions along the lanes
are entered in a global system of stations (s) which defines an alignment of the
lanes to each other.
3-6
SOFiSTiK 2016
3.6
GAX
Item
Description
Unit
Default
NO
Axis identifier
LT4
A1
[m] 1001
[m] 1001
[m] 1001
[m] 1001
[m] 1001
NX
Direction vector
NY
NZ
LT
AXIS
LT32
TYPE
Type of axis
AXIS
general axis
LANE
traffic lane
Designation of lane
A general geometric axis with all details may be now defined in SOFIMSHC. For
SOFiLOAD / ELLA / GEOS only a simplified definition is provided as follows.
Definition with a length resp. station in the plan view For the first record of
an axis the start point (X,Y,Z) and the start direction (NX,NY,NZ), the length
S of the first segment and optional curvature and clothoidal parameter is
specified. All consecutive records contain only the next S-value and the
curvature parameters.
If a radius is defined, a transition element from the last radius to the current
value is generated. Positive values for R cause a curvature to the right-hand
side, whilst negative values a curvature to the left-hand side. If A is defined,
a clothoidal spiral transition curve is created where the curvature increases
for the positive values of A and decreases for the negative values. If the
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-7
The described elements will be automatically adopted from WinGRAF as dynamic axis. A graphical check is recommended with the programs WING or
WinGRAF.
The options to define the elevation or cross falls are now only available in
SOFiMSHC.
3-8
SOFiSTiK 2016
3.7
LANE
Item
Description
Unit
Default
NO
LT
TYPE
LT
WR
[m] 1001
WL
[m] 1001
-WR
SA
SE
YCA
[m] 1001
YCE
[m] 1001
YCA
YRA
[m] 1001
YLA
[m] 1001
YRE
[m] 1001
YRA
YLE
[m] 1001
YLA
Effective length of segment for impact coefficients and loaded length dependencies
CONT add to last segment
[m] 1001
HSA
[m] 1001
0.0
HSE
[m] 1001
HSA
INCA
[mm]
0.0
INCE
[mm]
INCA
HEFF
[m] 1001
BEFF
[m] 1001
DEFF
[m] 1001
INCD
0.25
ASL
[m] 1001
WREF
[m] 1001
1.435
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-9
The total loading area will be subdivided in up to 99 individual traffic lanes relative to a given geometrical axis. These may be created automatically by a predefined standard section or with explicit coordinates. One may subdivide each
segment with different widths and dynamic impact factors. All lanes have to be
defined together to an existing axis, any new definition will delete all previously
defined lane definitions.
The width of the lane is defined through the left and the right boundaries. The
lane can be widened or narrowed by different input data at different stations.
If the lane edges happen to intersect the lane, this should be defined only at
distinct points to allow for correct treating of torsional loading.
The width of the load train may be less than those of the lane. In that case
additional basic areas are established loaded by a constant load specified with
the load train. If the load train is larger than the lane width, reductions of the
applied loading are possible.
The lane 0 has to be defined always, for the following procedures two cases
have to be distinguished:
There is only lane 0, the width of the moving loading is defined only by the
load train.
There are other lanes within the curb stone limits. Then lane 0 defines the
total extend of the traffic load including pathways. The width of the moving
load is the maximum extend of the other lanes.
3-10
SOFiSTiK 2016
4.00
2.00
AXIS.1
T 0.00
101
2.00
4.00
M 1 : 70
Default constant sections are available via literals as follows. If such type (without blanc spaces) is given at the main lane, secondary lanes will be automatically created:
RQ7.5, RQ9.5, RQ10.5, RQ15.5,
RQ20, RQ26, RQ29.5
RQ33, RQ35.5
For the following types the definition of the curbstone coordinates is always required, which is constant along the total lane.
EC
BS
TMH7
CAN
IRC
JRA
AS
If the lanes have all the same width, they will be aligned from the right (positive
y-values) starting with number 1. However if this is not the case, lane 1 is always
the central lane with the total traffic area, more lanes with numbers 2 to 9 will
be created aside. together with lane 1. Additional lanes will be created right
adjusted starting with number 10 and left adjusted with number 20. For TMH7
lanes 11,12,13 resp. 19,18,17 with extrem eccentricity will be created.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-11
AXIS.11
T 102
2.00
4.00
AXIS.10
T 2.00
101
0.00
4.00
M 1 : 70
Figure 3.5: Two lanes adjusted to the right loaded and residual area
4.00
AXIS.20
T2.00
101
0.00
AXIS.21
T 1022.00
4.00
M 1 : 70
Figure 3.6: Two lanes adjusted to the left loaded and residual area
Residual areas are the areas between the edges defined by the width of the
load train and the edges of the lane itself. The pathways are thus only included
in lane 0. Gaps between the lanes are NOT treated as residual loading areas.
For the loading of the lane in SOFiLOAD it will be subdivided in the longitudinal
direction into segments (e.g. each span). If several lane-definitions should be
combined to one single segment, the definition of L is only possible for the first of
the definitions, while specifying for all the others the literal CONT at this position.
For railway bridges there are detailed tables available within EC1 or DIN FB 101
how to select the governing length. Further there are detailed descriptions how
to calculate the effective pressures from the load which needs the input values
HEFF to ASL however which are definable in SOFiLOAD only.
+ INC
INCD
YL
HEFF
BEFF
INCD
z
HS
y
YR
3-12
SOFiSTiK 2016
3.8
LSEL
Item
Description
Unit
Default
NO
Lane identifier
t8
INT
[m] 1001
99
DY
[m] 1001
99
DZ
[m] 1001
99
RSEL
LT
EDGE
LT
(RSEL)
/ Lt
DX
RSEQ
LSEL
LSEQ
[m] 1001
2.0
YMAX
maximum eccentricity
[m] 1001
0.0
YMIN
minimum eccentricity
[m] 1001
0.0
An already defined lane gets activated for evaluation with the record LSEL. At
NO one has to specify the axis identifier (4 chars) optionally appended by a dot
and a digit for the lane number (e.g. A1.3 but also with wild cards like A1.? or
A1.1?). Without a lane number all lanes of that axis are selected, which is not
always a good choice to minimze analysis time. At the same time parameters
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-13
3-14
SOFiSTiK 2016
3.9
Influence areas are calculated from unit load cases, when the record CALC is
input. In every case all the influence areas are produced for the corresponding
internal forces. The record CALC specifies for which elements and for which
scalar variables the evaluation of the influence area will be performed.
For each extreme value of any scalar variable a load case can be generated
and stored in the database. The corresponding values of the rest of the internal
forces are calculated automatically too.
As an alternate way one may read influence lines or areas which were stored
as load cases in the data base with the input option LINF. The values are then
interpolated to the defined lanes. The results, however, do not get stored in the
database.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-15
3.10
See also:
CASE
CALC
Item
Description
Unit
Default
TYPE
LT
FROM
/ Lt4
TO
/ Lt4
FROM
DELT
SYST
LT
LMAX
LMIN
PHI
If no input occurred for FROM, TO and DELT, all elements of the structure will
be selected. Multiple overlapping definitions are possible, the latest positive
definition is valid. Instead of the element numbers a group may be selected via
or FROM GRP group.
The parameter SYST can define a reduced influence line evaluation. This may
result in a significant reduction of the CPU time and the memory requirement
e.g. in the case of girders, if a three-dimensional model was defined due to
the prestress and the temperature, while the imposed loads are acting only at a
two-dimensional girder. The influence lines for the axial force as well as for the
transverse bending are not calculated or evaluated with the input SYST GIRD.
List of the Scalar Variables
1. Beam Elements
N, VY, VZ, MT, MY, MZ
3-16
SOFiSTiK 2016
TRUS
CABL
P, M
Bending moments
Shear forces
Membrane forces
4. Nodes
UX, UY, UZ
global displacements
PHIX, PHIY, PHIZ
global rotations
UXL, UYL, UZL
local displacements
UXXL, UYYL, UZZL
global rotations
local displacements may not be saved in the database
5. Result sets
Result sets will be selected with TYPE RSET:xxxxx, where xxxxx is
either the ID of the item within a set to be evaluated or a number if the
x-th item of all result sets should be evaluated. Supported are all forces
and moments of beam, truss and cable elements, forces and stresses
in the center of QUAD and BRIC elements and nodal displacements,
support forces and spring forces (but not resultant PT)
At FROM and TO the idents of the result sets may be specified in lexical
order (FROM may also contain wildcards, e.g. "SU*") .
The evaluation of the influence lines for nodal support forces is possible by an
import of a deflection area caused from a nodal displacement, as force of a
supporting spring or via the result sets.
The application of ELLA for plane frames or shear walls provides so many
possibilities for miss-understandings, that we do not support this feature.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-17
3.11
See also:
SHOW
LINF
Item
Description
Unit
Default
T1
LT
MAMI
L1
T2
LT
MAMI
L2
T3
LT
MAMI
L3
T4
LT
MAMI
L4
T5
LT
MAMI
L5
T6
LT
MAMI
L6
PHI
Impact factor or characteristic length for impact factor if given with a length unit
TITL
LT24
Influence lines or areas which were stored as load cases can be taken over for
the evaluation along the defined lane axis. However, results are only printed and
do not get stored in the database.
Up to six corresponding influence lines can be defined together.
For type T1 to T6 one can enter:
MAMI
MAX
MIN
ACC
Positive load case numbers are processed with the first set of impact factors
3-18
SOFiSTiK 2016
(bending), while negative load case numbers use the second set (shear).
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-19
3.12
APPL
Item
Description
Unit
Default
TYPE
LT
STAN
0.
TGEN
The CPU time for obtaining the influence lines can be reduced by using the
default value of APPL. The options TRAV and FULL are only useful for threedimensional systems with the corresponding loads.
The item TGEN specifies at which cross sections within a beam element the
additional loading locations are defined. A loading location is inserted, when the
difference of the reciprocal stiffness of two neighbouring cross sections is larger
than a multiple of TGEN.
1
1
1
> TGEN
E
E+1
E
(3.1)
The input of TGEN is recommended for structures with many similar cross sections, because the CPU time and the memory allocation are reduced then significantly. For instance, TGEN 1.E10 suppresses the insertion of any loading
locations at internal beam sections.
3-20
SOFiSTiK 2016
3.13
Item
Description
TYPE
Paper size
Positive value
Negative value
SC
Scale
0
SIZE
Unit
Default
-lp
Landscape format
Portrait format
format filling
Paper width
cm
Paper height
cm
MARG
Draws a border
OFF
does not draw a border
NO
draws only an inner border
YES
release of an additional border
FULL draws an additional border
around the sheet
LT
FULL
FORM
LT
ZTVK
HDIV
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
2001
Table continued on next page.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-21
Item
Description
C7
Unit
Default
2235
Graphic representations are only produced, when the record SIZE is input. If
a pen number is defined negatively, the corresponding line type does not get
plotted. The lines to be plotted are prescribed with the input of the record SHOW.
Without ECHO LPOS only the influence lines will be shown, with ECHO LPOS
the actual load position will be also visualized, which will need more pictures in
general.
The item causes a subdivision of the sheet into some strips, so that the corresponding influence lines can be plotted at the same drawing. Positive values
draw the lane axis along the paper width and subdivide the paper height; negative values have a contrary effect. The default is that three lines get plotted
parallel to the largest dimension of the paper.
3-22
SOFiSTiK 2016
3.14
Item
Description
SNO
Lane number
0
all
lit4
all lanes of axis lit4
lit4.n
only lane n of axis lit4
TYPE
Influence location
ALL
All types
LINF explicit bending areas (LINF)
BEAM Beam elements
TRUS Truss elements
CABL Cable elements
SPRI Spring elements
QUAD Plane elements
NO
SHOW
Unit
Default
LT
ALL
LT
ALL
ETYP
DSV
YMAX
1.E-6
With SHOW the lines which should be printed (record ECHO IL) and / or plotted
(record SIZE) are selected. The item DSV controls the distance between marked
positions in the output. Available values are shown then at least in this distance.
However, extreme values are output additionally in all cases.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-23
3.15
ACT
Item
Description
Unit
Default
TYPE
Designation of action
LT4
GAMU
GAMF
PSI0
PSI1
PSI2
PS1S
GAMA
PART
LT
LT
LT24
SUP
TITL
Designation of action
As type of the action one may use any literal with up to 4 characters, however
some combinations are reserved for special purpose. They are defined in the
3-24
SOFiSTiK 2016
corresponding INI-files and will follow the designation of the selected design
code as close as possible. An overview is given in the table below. Further it is
possible to subdivide each action with two characters in categories selected with
a character from A to Z, each having distinguished combination coefficients or
safety factors. The category will be appended with an underscore to the name
of the action.
Each category has its own combination values and its own load cases and a
default superposition rule within the action category,
Each Category comprehends all its categories, i.e. one may select either a
sub category on its own or all categories by the generic name of the category.
(Q selects all Q_?)
I N I - File/ EC- Default s
act ion G
loadcase
loadcase
act ion Q
act ion Q_A
loadcase
loadcase
act ion Q_B
loadcase
loadcase
Figure 3.9: Structure of the actions, their categories and their load cases
For example there are for road bridges in EC1-3 for the uniform life load UDL and
the movable double axle different combination coefficients. For simple cases
one will define a load case for every span of type L_U (UDL), to be superimposed conditionally, while the discrete load cases of different load positions of
the double axle will be defined as type L_T and exclude each other. All load
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-25
NONE
Gg
ZGg
SGq
dead load
G1g
Z1g
S1q
G2g
Z2g
S2q
Pg
ZPg
SPq
Cg
ZCg
SCq
ZQ
SQ
variable load
ZL
SL
ZW
SW
Sq
ZS
SS
Rg
ZR
SR
Fq
ZF
SF
ZT
ST
Temperature
ZA
SA
Accidental
ZB
SB
ZE
SE
Construction, Maintenance
(ZB = resistance of bearings, SB = Exchange of bearings)
Earthquake (ZE = Service, SE = Design)
The actions indicated in the table are used only as preset action, provided that
they are available in the INI-file of the selected design code.
The entries within one row with preceding Z for additional loading and S for
special loading may be treated in AQB as belonging to the same action.
3-26
SOFiSTiK 2016
Further there is an action GA for dead weight for the check of stability (Buoyancy,
overturning etc.) with = 1.10/ 0.90 instead of = 1.35/ 1.00.
For the action of earthquake there is in EC 8 an importance factor depending
on the importance class to be selected by the user explicitly:
Class factor Description
I
1.4
II
1.2
III
1.0
IV
0.8
Buildings whose integrity during earthquakes is of vital importance for civil protection, e.g. hospitals, fire stations, power
plants, etc.
Buildings whose seismic resistance is of importance in view
of the consequences associated with a collapse, e.g. schools,
assembly halls, cultural institutions etc.
Ordinary buildings, not belonging to the other categories
Buildings of minor importance for public safety, e.g. agricultural buildings, etc.
[0.70]
[0.50]
[0.30]
- Q_A
Housing
[0.70]
[0.50]
[0.30]
- Q_B
Offices
[0.70]
[0.50]
[0.30]
- Q_C
Assembly rooms
[0.70]
[0.70]
[0.60]
- Q_D
Sales rooms
[0.70]
[0.70]
[0.60]
- Q_E
Storage rooms
[1.00]
[0.90]
[0.80]
[0.70]
[0.70]
[0.60]
- Q_G
[0.70]
[0.50]
[0.30]
- Q_H
Roofs
[0.00]
[0.00]
[0.00]
Tandem Axle of LM 1
[0.75]
[0.75]
[0.20]
- L_U
UDL loading of LM 1
[0.40]
[0.40]
[0.20]
- L_C
[0.80]
[0.80]
[0.00]
- L_D
[0.80]
[0.80]
[0.00]
- L_E
[0.00]
[0.80]
[0.00]
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-27
Action
[0.70]
[0.70]
[0.60]
- L_G
[0.70]
[0.50]
[0.30]
- L_H
Roofs
[0.00]
[0.00]
[0.00]
[0.60]
[0.20]
[0.00]
[0.50]
[0.20]
[0.00]
[0.70]
[0.50]
[0.20]
1-60/ h
1-250/ h
1-1000/ h
[0.60]
[0.50]
[0.00]
[0.60]
[0.50]
[0.00]
F: Settlements
[1.00]
[1.00]
[1.00]
Other actions
[0.80]
[0.70]
[0.50]
The user should check the defaults in all cases. Deviations of the PSI-values
for wind and temperature especially for bridges or other non buildings are to be
expected as all values are "boxed values" depending on individual or country
dependant settings. For example you will find in OENORM B 4750 categories
with trucks between 30 and 60 kN with values augmented by 0.1 for 1 and 2 .
For all EN codes as well the SIA codes there are two defaults for the live load for
buildings with the categories F,G and H. The user can choose, whether the live
load for buildings should be in an own action L (with categories L_F, L_G and
L_H) or whether these categories should be a part of the action Q in addition to
the payloads for buildings (categories Q_A till Q_H).
Values GAMU to PS1S replace the predefined values which should be checked
by the user if not defined. With the specification of ACT all subsequent load
cases will then have this action type as default.
It might be possible to reinitialize an action, due to some changed parameters
of a design code. SOFiLOAD provides two possibilities: ACT INIT deletes all
actions, ACT TYPE INIT or a new parameter definition will reinitialize the action
TYPE with the current defaults. As such changes may have unforeseeable side
effects on existing definitions and results, this has to be done with extreme care.
PART defines, to which action of the selected superposition equation the input
action belongs. The actions in the superposition equations are distinguished
according to their temporal variances:
3-28
SOFiSTiK 2016
permanent actions:
variable actions
PART G
PART P
prestress
PART Q
PART Q_1
load group 1
PART Q_2
load group 2
...
PART Q_9
accidental actions
PART A
action earthquake
PART E
load group 9
Thus the item PART allows the correct classification of user-defined actions, but
also of special cases as for example PART G SUP ALEX (always but exclusive,
it means, that only one load case is always used). Exclusively the item SUP
controls, how the load cases which are a part of the actions are used for the
superposition (always, conditional, mutually exclusive).
Meant for example PART P, that the input action is used in the equation part
Pk for superpositions for ultimate and serviceability limit state (EC,DIN, DIN-FB,
see manual MAXIMA, chapter 2).
The item PART depends on TYPE for preset actions. For example PART G is
the default for the actions G, G1 and G2, PART P for the actions P and C, PART
Q for the actions Q and L, PART A for the action A and PART E for the action E.
The item PART has to be input for user-defined actions. Otherwise the userdefined actions get PART Q (default).
The item SUP defines the default treatment of multiple load cases within an
action. The default will be taken from the INI-File, but for free defined types of
actions it is EXCL in general, if the type of the action has a leading Q it will
become COND and for a leading G it will be PERM.
In MAXIMA one may overwrite this for any particular load case of an action or
recombine load cases (e.g. 0.7*LC_101(Ex)+0.5*LC_102(Ey)). Due to historic
reasons there are special literals at record LC in MAXIMA in addition to the
literals of SUP:
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-29
SOFiLOAD MAXIMA
Remark
ACT SUP
LC TYPE
PERM
PERC
PERC
COND
EXCL
A*
mutually exculsive
EXEX
Ano
UNSI
mutually exclusive but conditional inclusive categories (only within an action), MAXIMA record LC
only one alternative group number Ano
changing sign (e.g. earthquake)
USEX
X*
ALEX
AG1
Using SUP PERM the same safety factor is used for all load cases of a permanent action (e.g. ACT G). In this case the sum of the values of the single load
cases is decisive, whether the unfavourable (GAMU) or the favourable (GAMF)
safety factor is applied. In the contrast to that the safety factors are considered
load-case-wisely, if SUP PERC is defined. Here one load case of the permanent
action can get GAMU and another GAMF.
SUP EXEX excludes only categories against each other within an action
(no exclusion of different actions). If for example the categories X_1 and X_2
of the action X are defined with SUP EXEX, then only the most unfavourable load
case is used either from X_1 or from X_2 and also only, if it has an unfavourable
contribution. In the contrast to that an unfavourable load case from X_1 and an
unfavourable load case from X_2 are used for the input of SUP EXCL.
SUP ALEX defines a permanent alternative group (MAXIMA record LC TYPE
AG1). Only the load cases of an action or all load cases of the categories of
an action are used for the formation of a permanent alternative group. Here
only a load case is considered for the superposition, also if it has a favourable
contribution. Load cases of different actions do not exclude themselves mutually.
If SUP ALEX is input for some actions, a load case is considered per action.
In program MAXIMA it is additionally possible to assign load cases of an action or category to several permanent alternative groups. The input is done in
program MAXIMA with LC ... TYPE AG1 till AG99.
The total mechanism of the defaults for the action types is governed by the
3-30
SOFiSTiK 2016
following rules:
By selecting a design code within AQUA all definitions given in the associated INI-File in the [action] -section will become available. If no such file
is available, defaults in the program are available for all EC and newer DIN
(since year 2000). For all other cases there are exactly two predefined actions G and Q without any coefficients or factors.
When creating a load case, the factors are copied from the action definition
to the load case. However those factors may be modified for any individual
load case.
For special design purposes the factors may be changed temporarily when
using the load cases in AQB.
1.4 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.6 PART Q_1 SUP excl
1.3 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.5 PART Q_1 SUP excl
1.45 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.6 PART Q_2 SUP exex
1.35 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.5 PART Q_3 SUP exex
...
PROG MAXIMA
HEAD
COMB 1 desi TYPE desi BASE 2100
ACT XY_1
LC -1
ACT XY_2
LC -1
ACT XY_3
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-31
LC -1
ACT XY_4
LC -1
or
COMB 2 expl TYPE desi BASE 2200
ADD {QI} gamm
First of all three load groups Q_1, Q_2 and Q_3 are defined with PART in the
program SOFiLOAD. The categories XY_1 und XY_2 are a art of the load group
1. Their load cases are mutually exclusive only within the respective category
about the input SUP EXCL. The categories XY_3 and XY_4 are a part of the
load groups 2 and 3. All load cases of both categories are mutually exclusive
about the input SUP EXEX.
With one of the MAXIMA combinations then the superposition is done as follows:
First of all MAXIMA searches which load cases of the load group 1 are decisive
(possible one ore two or no load case = first intermediate superposition).Then
the decisive load case of the load groups 2 and 3 is determined (possible one
or no load case = second intermediate superposition). In the last step the final
superposition is done. Either the decisive load cases of the load group 1 or the
decisive load case of the goups 2 and 3 are here the final result.
3-32
SOFiSTiK 2016
3.16
Item
Description
NO
TYPE
PSI0
LC
Unit
Default
LT
PSI1
PSI2
PS1S
GAMU
GAMF
TITL
Title of loadcase
Lt24
The input of the loading occurs in the form of load trains identified by a load case
number, which must not be used for other cases, and the position of load trains
within lanes.
The record LC must be followed by the definition of a corresponding load train:
TRAI
TRPL,TRBL
The combination values may be taken from the action selected by the TYPE or
will be default to the values according to EC1 Part 3 Appendix C, or may be
specified explicitly. For the resulting load cases of the evaluation the maximum
value of all applied trains will be saved. These values will then be accepted from
the program MAXIMA.
Deviations of the PSI-values for wind and temperature especially for bridges ot
other non buildings are to be expected as all values are "boxed values" depending on individual or country dependent settings. For example you will find in
OENORM B 4750 categories with trucks between 30 and 60 kN values augmented by 0.1 for 1and 2.
Furthermore the DIN-Fachberichte supply different combination values for the
constant load an the heavy vehicle.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-33
3.17
TRAI
Item
Description
Unit
Default
TYPE
LT
CONS
P1
kN, m
P2
kN, m
P3
kN, m
P4
kN, m
P5
kN/ m2
P6
Wind loading
kN/ m2
P7
[m] 1001
P8
P9
[m] 1001
PFAC
1.0
[m] 1001
PHI
PHIS
FUGA
1.0
XCON
[m] 1001
[m] 1001
0.0
LT
YEX
DIR
Direction of train
B
= in both directions
R
= only to the right (positive)
L
= only to the left (negative)
N
= train does not move at all
[km/ h] 1203
3-34
SOFiSTiK 2016
Item
Description
Unit
Default
DIRT
LT
1/ sec
0.0
DAB
BOGI
/ kN
0.0
FRBO
1/ sec
DABO
0.0
WHEE
/ kN
0.0
FRWH
1/ sec
DAWH
0.0
The description of all available load trains can be found within the next pages.
If a value for the convoy distance is given (XCON), the specified train will be
applied multiple times with that given minimum distance between the last load
ordinate and the reference point of the consecutive loadtrain.
The entire, possibly variable, width of the lane is loaded by the basic area loading
P5. By contrast, the loading travel having a constant width. The basic area
loading is applied without dynamic factors and without centrifugal forces.
The wind loading is generally equal to P6 and acts horizontally upon a traffic
band with height P7. As there will be no traffic for strong winds, this is not the
maximum wind load on the structure itself. The sign of the wind load is defined
as positive if coming from the right in the moving direction, but option DIRT
allows a more specific definition. ELLA has the possibility in record POSL via
OPT to apply the wind load in the most unfavourable direction at its own, if DIRT
has allowed this. Both options are combined with a logical and-operation.
The load trains have a moving direction which is not only important for some of
the train loads but also for the direction of the braking load. Positive load values
are considered to be braking loads in traveling direction, negative load values
are accelerating loads in reverse direction. If DIR N is specified, no impact
factor will be applied and the brake and velocity and wind load will be preset to
zero.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-35
The meaning of value P8 is different for each loading type. The sign of the
braking load will be taken from the moving direction. A changing sign (DIR B)
will be only possible for ELLA to take care of. ELLA and SOFILOAD allow to
change the direction or deactivate the loading.
For an analysis with multi-body-dynamics it is possible to generate masses,
beams, springs and dampers via the record TREX. The mass of bogie and wheel
may be specified either as a positive absolute load value or as a negative fraction
of the total mass. For more information see record TREX.
Table of Standard Load Trains:
USER
LM1
LM2
LM3
SV,SOV
LM4
FLM1
FLM2
FLM3
FLM4
SLW
LKW
LKWD
LKWA
Austrian truck
NBR
HS
HT
HST
3-36
SOFiSTiK 2016
CAN
ONT
HA
HA according BS 5400
HB
HB according BS 5400
IRC
JRA
BRO1
BRO2
BRO3
BROF
AS_A
AS_M
AS_S
HLP
UIC
SW
SW/2
RFAT
HSLM
RL
ASRT
All load trains may be extended with TRPL and TRBL definitions. If none of
the standard load elements of the rain should be used, but other properties like
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-37
impact factors should be retained, the literal USER may be defined for P1. The
user should take care of:
The default live load P5 should be deducted for the areas loaded by the
defined loading.
The distance to the last load of a standard train may be not as expected due
to automatically generated loads of those type and should be checked.
The Eurocode load model allows the loading to be moved across the lane within
some limits, each load will have therefore a range of possible eccentricities for
ELLA.
3.17.1
Impact Factor
Two different dynamic factors are provided for bending or shear effects. The
values depend on the dynamic properties of the structure, the type of loading
and on an effective length, to be defined in general for every individual element
and result with record CALC. If that is not done, the value defined with the lane
geometry is used, but one can also specify an explicit value for each of those
four values. With the definition of PHI STEE, CONC, PRCO und COMP variants
of the formulas may be selected, if the design code supplies such variants.
Default formulas are:
DIN
UIC
UICB
BS
(3.4)
3-38
(3.3)
(3.2)
(3.5a)
(3.5b)
SOFiSTiK 2016
NA
SW/0
SW/2
AASH
(3.6)
(3.7)
CAN
IRC
(3.8a)
(3.8b)
JRA
AS
(T)
(L)
(3.9a)
(3.9b)
AS_M
(3.10a)
(3.10b)
Railway loading distinguishes between ballasted and direct fixing (input with LANE) and account for the reference length as
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-39
follows:
p
PHB = 1.0 + 2.16/ ( LPH 0.20) 0.27 ( > 3.6) (3.11a)
p
PHB = 1.0 + 2.16/ ( LPH 0.20) 0.17 ( > 2.0) (3.11b)
LPHI should be defined for the axis via LANE. However ELLA may also use
the distance of the zero values of the influence line as a good approach to the
effective length. If no input for LPHI is given, the dynamic factor will be set equal
to the value with a minimum length and the width of the lane will be set equal to
0.0.
Dynamic coefficients according to appendix E of DIN FB 101 are dependant on
the frequency of the structure and should be specified explicitly therefore.
3.17.2
Centrifugal Forces
In case of a curve, the mass of the loading, usually derived from the vertical
load, is used together with the speed of the train and the curvature of the lane
to compute the centrifugal load components.
The forces calculated according to the laws of physics with vin [ m/sec] are:
P = P
2
;
Rg
g = 9.80665 m/ sec2
(3.12)
(r < 200m)
Qtk = 40 Q / R
Qtk = 0
(200m r 1500m)
(r > 1500m)
(3.13a)
(3.13b)
(3.13c)
3-40
(3.14)
SOFiSTiK 2016
For FUGA you may however specify an additional factor explicitly. Negative
factors will enforce the laws of physic to all type of load trains.
In those cases where a constant horizontal centrifugal loading or horizontal
bumping has to be considered a horizontal loading PW/HW may be specified
with TRPL/TRBL.
3.17.3
The position of the loading according to Eurocode within the traffic lanes is free.
The synchronisation with secondary lanes should not be applied. The minimum
distance of 0.5 m between adjacent loading is not checked by ELLA but will be
satisfied in almost all cases if the width of the lane is at least 2.5 m.
The double axle should be applied only in total. Thus all loads of the axles will
be set to be applied even if favourable.
Load Model 1
There is one double axle with a spacing of 1.2 m. For the different lane classes
it is generally recommended to use three different load trains with individual
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-41
adjustment factors q. These factors are specified in national annexes and are
defined in the INI-files. (e.g. DIN Fachbericht with a value of Q = 0.8, SIA with
a value of Q = 0.9). Other values may be specified with a direct load value if
needed.
P1 = Class
P3 = reserved [ kN]
9.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
0.0
0.0
The brake loading is calculated according to the length of the total lane and
distributed as uniform load along the line:
Qk = 1.2 P2 + 0.10 P4 WDT L
180Q1 Qk 900kN
(3.15)
The upper limit is defined by the requests of the STANAG, it may be redefined
by a national annex or other means. This may be specified via a global variable
EN1991-2_QLMAX in the INI-file.
Load Model 2
This load model is a single axle taken from load model 1, but with a dynamic
impact factor and the wheels may act independently. As this load model is only
for local elements it should not be selected within ELLA, especially as it does
not work with influence areas (INT>2). A possible application is the accidential
load case of a vehicle on the pathway:
3-42
SOFiSTiK 2016
P1 = Basic Value
P3 = Rotation [ ]
80
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Load Model 3
This load model is for special cases of heavy load vehicles. We have to distinguish between the narrow version fitting within one lane (2 axles) and the
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-43
broader version for P2=240 (3 axles). For the latter case the loading of the
same load train in two synchronized lanes with special provisions of YEX should
be used. Parts of the load train not within the lane imits will be clipped automatically.
The three values of P1 to P3 define the loading as follows (Table A1):
600 / 150
4 150 kN
900 / 150
6 150 kN
1200 / 150
8 150 kN
1200 / 200
6 200 kN
1500 / 150
10 150 kN
1500 / 200
7 200 kN + 1 100 kN
1800 / 150
12 150 kN
1800 / 200
9 200 kN
2400 / 200
12 200 kN
2400 / 240
10 240 kN
15 200 kN
3000 / 240
12 240 kN + 1 120 kN
8 200 kN + 7 200 kN
3600 / 200
18 200 kN
3600 / 240
15 240 kN
3-44
6 200 kN + 6 200 kN
9 200 kN + 9 200 kN
SOFiSTiK 2016
The speed of the load train is a very important parameter, it does not only control
front and rear for some load trains, but it defines also if the load train is moving
slowly (v = 5 km/h) or with a regular speed (v = 70 km/h). This triggers if an
impact factor is applied or not.
Further there will be no loading witin a distance of 25 m before and behind
that vehicle, but then a load train LM1 with ist frequent load values (1 ) may be
applied, by specifying the load case number of a correspondig LM1 load train at
P4. To select the relative position to the vehicle before or behind the sign of the
P4 definition will be taken. A positive value will select a vehicel before, while a
negative value will select a value behind. The implemented algorithm does not
allow to select this automatically.
As the coefficients 1 are different for UDL and TS, we use from this load case
the value 1 for TS, but for UDL and the residual loding the default value of 0.4
of the EN will be taken.
Load Model 3 (NA BS)
NA to BS EN 1991-2:2003 defines different types of this load model. The distance to the residual loading in the lane has been reduced to 2.5 resp 5.0 m.
As every axle has a different dynamic amplification factor, these will be applied
directly if V is larger than 5 km/h.
Load trains of the Special Types General Order (STGO) will be selected with
TYPE SV, where P1 defines the class (80, 100 or 196), P2 and P3 are not used,
alle other remarks especially about P4 remain valid:
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-45
Load trains of the Special Order (SO) will be selected with TYPE SOV:
P1
= Class
250
350
450
600
P2
P3
Load Model 4
This is a pedestrian load model with a basic load area with a maximum value of
5.0kN/ m2 . For a loaded length greater 10 m the load value will be decreased:
q k = 2.0 +
3-46
120
L + 30
(3.16)
SOFiSTiK 2016
80 kN
40 kN
P3 = Distance of axles
3.00 m
For the application of this load model the definition of the loadgroup is mandatory: GR3 or GR4 for the area loading and GR0 for the service vehicle.
Load Model FLM1
This model is identical to LM1, but the Axle loads will be reduced by a factor of
0.7, and the distributed loading by 0.3.
Load Model FLM2
This selects via P1 the frequent truck models according Table 4.6 with the following axle load values:
SOFiSTiK 2016
P1 = 1
90 / 190 kN
P1 = 2
80 / 140 / 140 kN
P1 = 3
P1 = 4
P1 = 5
3-47
This is a complete truck with two double axles P1 with a distance of 6.0 m
designed for the fatigue design.
3-48
SOFiSTiK 2016
120
0.0
70 / 130 kN
P1 = 2
70 / 120 / 120 kN
P1 = 3
70 / 150 / 90 / 90 / 90 kN
P1 = 4
70 / 140 / 90 / 90 kN
P1 = 5
70 / 130 / 90 / 80 / 80 kN
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-49
3.17.4
Those classical load trains are used in several countries in Europe (DIN 1072,
OENORM B 4002, Spanische IAP and Brasilian NBR). National variants may
be selected with a country code. The width of the moving loading is 3.0 m
in general, for the OENORM it is 2.5 m and for the Spanish IAP a minimum
distance to the secondary truck suggests a width of 4.0 m. The rest of the traffic
band is loaded by P3, the remaining areas inside the lane are loaded with the
basic area loading P5. With DIR N one may select a secondary lane without any
dynamic factors.
The direct definition of a second load train beside with P2 und P4 can not be
supported for some of the recent features. It us strongly recommended to use
synchronized lanes instead, it is recommended to use two lanes with individual
3-50
SOFiSTiK 2016
P3 kN/ m2
SLW 30
100
5.0
3.0
SLW 60
200
5.0
3.0
LKW 3/3
20+10
3.0
2.0
2.0
LKW 6/6
40+20
4.0
2.0
2.0
LKW 9/9
60+30
4.0
3.0
3.0
LKW 12
80+40
4.0
3.0
3.0
LKW 12/12
80+40
4.0
3.0
3.0
LKW 16/16
100+60
5.0
3.0
3.0
LKWA
16/16
LKWA
25/25
NBR 45
110+50
4.0
3.0
3.0
170+80
5.0
3.0
3.0
150(SLW)
5.0
3.0
NBR 30
100(SLW)
5.0
3.0
NBR 12
80/40(LKW)
4.0(3.0)
3.0
NBR 36
120(SLW)
5.0
3.0
NBR 24
80(SLW)
4.0
3.0
P4 kN/ m2
P5 kN/ m2
P6 = 1.25 kN/m2
P7 = 3.50 m
Brake loading:
DIN 1072 defines a total brake loading with a maximum of 900 kN and a minimum of 30 % of the heavy load trains within the principal and secondary lane
or 25% of the total principal lane. As the brake loading is an other load class
than the standard life load it is not always possible to apply both loads within one
loadcase. IAP has a minimum of 140 kN and a maximum of 720 kN.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-51
3.17.5
Load train
P2 (H)
P2 (HS)
P3
P4
10
H10-44(M18)
40 kN
58 kN
4.7 kN/m
15
H15-44(M13.5)
60 kN
87 kN
7.1 kN/m
20
H20-44(M9)
80 kN
116 kN
9.4 kN/m
25
HL 98 (2005)
110 kN
9.3 kN/m
1.20
Wind loading:
P6 = 1.46 kN/m
P7 = 1.829 m (6ft)
Brake loading:
3-52
SOFiSTiK 2016
up to L = 50 m:
p = 336 L0.67
(3.17)
(3.18)
It is then possible that shorter loaded lengths could lead to higher forces. As
this can not be treated easily, ELLA uses an approximation by evaluating an effective length according to BD 37/01 figure 11. SBase
(3.19)
In Hong Kong (BS + Country code 852) the formulas are slightly different:
up to L = 70 m:
p = 400 L0.67
(3.20)
from L = 70 m:
p = 44 L0.15 < 14.85 kN/ m
(3.21)
Wind loading:
9 p 30
(3.22)
P6 = 1.25 kN/m
P7 = 2.50 m
The brake loading is also calculated according to the loaded length of the lane:
P8 = 200kN + 8.0 L 700kN
The loading NA (Bridge Design Code TMH7, South Africa 1981) is represented
by a uniform load P3 pu, with the magnitude depending on the length of the
p
loading and a concentrated load P1=144/ n kN (KEL). The value of P4 defines
the loaded length L as with the HA loading described above. P2 may be used
as with HA to generate a tandem loading.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-53
up to L = 36 m:
p = 36
(3.23)
from L = 36 m:
p = 6 + 180/ L0.5
Wind loading:
(3.24)
P6 = 1.25 kN/m
P7 = 2.50 m
The brake loading is also calculated according to the loaded length of the lane:
P8 = 100kN + 3.0 L 400kN
3.17.6
3-54
SOFiSTiK 2016
P3 = 2.000 ; P2 = 0.0
P3 = 1.333 ; P2 = +a/4
P3 = 1.333 ; P2 = -a/4
The Departmental Standard BD37/88 has other factors (Table 14). The default
value for P3 will be selected based on a nominal width bL of 3.048 m and the first
lane.
TMH7 applies the NB vehicle not combined with other life loads. Values P2 to
P4 will be ignored. The distance between the axis is 2.0 instead of 1.8 m.
Basic area loading:
P5 = 0.00 kN/m2
Wind loading:
P6 = 1.25 kN/m2
P7 = 2.5 m
Brake loading are % of the total load between first and second axle:
P8 = 0.25 (HB)
P8 = 0.20 (NB)
Hint
The basic area loading P5 is not deducted in the case of HA and HB loading. It always acts upon the full width of the lane.
TMH7 knows also a NC loading. As this is defined by two blocks of varying
width, length and distance. If the variation of this loading becomes t complex a
definition with individual block loads with TRBL may be useful.
P1 = 30.0
P2 = 5.0
P3 = 40.0
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-55
3.17.7
Figure 3.25: Load train HST (three axle truck, ed. 2002/2005)
The load train has a width of 3.048 m, the value of X can be between 4.267 and
9.144 m.
The values P2 and P3 are preset as follows:
3-56
P1
Load Train
P2 (H und HS)
P3
10
H10-44(M18)
90.0 kN
4.7 kN/m
15
H15-44(M13.5)
135.0 kN
7.1 kN/m
20
H20-44(M9)
180.0 kN
9.4 kN/m
US
HL 98 (2005)
9.34kN/m (640lb/ft)
SI
HL 98 (2005)
35 / 145 kN
9.3 kN/m
SOFiSTiK 2016
P5 = 0.00 kN/m2
Wind loading:
P6 = 1.46 kN/m2
P7 = 1.829 m
Brake loading:
The traffic band load P3 has been specified in the 2002 edition as an alternate
loading, with the load model HL 98 of the 2005 edition it is now active on the full
longitudinal length.
3.17.8
The Canadian standards define a truck load in several variants. The type CAN
is used for the default load train according chapter 14.9, while the type ONT is
used for the variation to be used in Ontario according Annex A14.4.
Axle no.
CL-W
1
0.04W
0.08W
3
2
0.1W 0.1W
0.2W 0.2W
4
0.14W
0.28W
25
50
62.5 62.5
125 125
87.5
175
CL-625
3.6 m
1.2 m
6.6 m
5
0.12W Wheel loads
0.24W Axle loads
75
150
Wheel loads, kN
Axle loads, kN
6.6 m
18 m
0.25 m
(Typ.)
0.25 m
(Typ.)
2.40 m
1.80 m
0.60 m
(Typ.)
The value P1 defines the level of the load train (CL1, CL2, CL3) or with MV the
maintenace vehicle according 3.8.11.
The value P2 defines the class of the load train (default 625).
If the value P3 is defined ( 9.0, 8.0 or 7.0 for class A, B or C and D) a constant
lane load will be defined with reduced load values of the load train without any
dynamic allowance. For this loading a braking load P8 of min(700,180+0.1*L)
will be applied. So P8 should become zero for secondary lanes.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-57
The height of the wind attack area P7 is 3.0[ m] , the zentrifugal force is acting
at P9=2.0[ m] aove the lane.
3.17.9
The provisions of the Indian Roads Congress has load trains acting always in
total. The type of the load train is always IRC, the subtype is given via P1. There
will be no other life load on the bridge (P5=0.0). How many lanes should be
loaded is given in table 2.
IRC AA - Heavy Loading for certain areas or highways This is a bogie of two
axles with a total weight of P2 (40t). There is only one lane loaded with this
train.
IRC AAT - Loading for certain areas or highways This is a tracked vehicle
with a total weight of P2 (70t). A convoy with a minimum distance of 90 m is
foreseen. There is only one lane loaded with this train.
IRC A - Loading for all permanent bridges This is a train with two trailers,
repeatable with a minimum distance of 18.5 m. The axle loading is P2 (27
kN), P3 (114 kN) and P4 (68 kN).
IRC B - Loading for timber bridges and temporary structures This is a train
with two trailers, repeatable with a minimum distance of 18.5 m. The axle
loading is P2 (16 kN), P3 (68 kN) and P4 (41 kN).
IRC nnR
All numbers refer to the hypothetical vehicles of appendix 1. An appended
R will select the wheeled trains, an appended S the four wheelers (only 3 to
24) and an appended T will select the tracked vehicle:
3, 5, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70
For the longitudinal effects of the loading the clause 208 establishes reduction
factor for multiple lanes. This effect should be taken into account during the
superposition of load cases.
The brake load with P8 (0.2 = 20 %) is defined as the fraction for the first load
train, while the other trains have only half of this value. P8 = 0.05 should be
applied in the case of more than two lanes to the other ones.
Wind loading:
P6 = 1.0 kN/m2
P7 = 3.0 m
3-58
SOFiSTiK 2016
JRAT B
Mult. Single Axis Class B for L < 15.0 m with Tab. 2.2.2.
P2
P4
P5
JRAL A
JRAL B
JRAL AS
JRAL BS
P3
P4
Load values P2 of JRAL are dependant on the length. In that case negative
values for P2 define factors to these basic values. Loads for pedestrian lanes
according to Tab. 2.2.4. have to be defined with type JRAL and P3=0.0.
3.17.11
The provisions of the Australian AS 5100 may be subdivided in two basic load
trains.
AS_A 160
and further a system with 12 axles and a variant length to be used with influence
lines.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-59
AS_M
AS_S
If more than one lane is loaded, the second lane shall be loaded with a lane
factor of 0.8 all subsequent lanes with 0.4. For fatigue 70 percent of the A160 or
M1600 load without uniform load value P3 should be used.
The "heavy load platform" is given in AS 5100.7. It is a load with 16 axles with
200 kN each for the HLP 320 and 250 kN for the HLP 400. The have either a
uniform distance of 1.8 m or a variable distance between 6 and 15 m between
two groups of 8 axles each.
HLP
3-60
SOFiSTiK 2016
3.17.12
The Swedish load trains have the special feature of variant distances between
the loads which are best treated using influence lines. However the short distance of 1.5m will be fixed to that minimum value, as there are hardly cases to
be expected not yielding the most unfavourable value with that short distance.
Most train types have different load values for primary and secondary lanes. The
parameter P1 is used to specify an enumeration for the most important lane, the
secondary lane etc.
BRO1
BRO2
P2
P3
12
P4
explicit distance
(minimum 6.0 m)
P5
9
3
6
2
0
0
BRO5
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-61
P1
Lane index
P2
250 170
P3
12
P4
explicit distance
(minimum 6.0 m)
P5
2
9
3
The second train has a distance with minimum of 50 m, the individual loads with a minimum of 10 m
BROF
3.17.13
Load trains of the railway are defined as axle loading in general. To get distributed loads more data is required, this is the dimension of the ballast with the
lane definition and here the distance of the sleepers and the gauge width. There
are hundreds of gauge widths, dependant on the country code the default is:
Spain, Portugal
3-62
SOFiSTiK 2016
all others
Defaults:
>0
6.4
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-63
Figure 3.32: Load train UIC = UIC 71 = RU (BS5400) - Constant Block Load
Wind loading:
P6 = 1.25 kN/m2
P7 = 3.50 m
Brake loading:
Centre of mass:
P9 = 1.8 m
Aerodynamic loading due to trains passing and derailing loading are not available.
Load train SW Schwerlastzug
3-64
SOFiSTiK 2016
Defaults:
Wind loading:
P6 = 1.25 kN/m2
P7 = 3.50 m
Brake loading:
Hint
load trains SW will act also if their contributions have favourable effects.
SOFiSTiK 2016
10
11
12
3-65
IC
ICE1
ICE2
ICE3
ICT2
ICT3
THAL
= French ( 878.4 t)
TGV
VIRG
EURO
TALG
AVE
ETRY
Defaults:
3-66
SOFiSTiK 2016
Defaults:
P1 = 200 kN
P2 = 50 kN/m
P3 = 25 kN/m
Wind loading:
P6 = 1.00 kN/m2
P7 = 3.7 m
Brake loading:
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-67
Figure 3.36: Load train ASRT = Railway Loading 300LA according AS 5100
The load train 300LA of the AS 5100 consists of a locomotive and as many
vehicles as necessary, each of them with a variant length between 12 and 20 m.
Unfortunately even with influence line it is hardly possible to deal with an infinite
number of variables, thus the load train has always a finite number of vehicles.
Defaults:
Brake loading:
For more than tow tracks, the loading in the third track is applied with a factor of
0.85, the fourth track with 0.70 and all other with 0.60.
For this load train different coefficients for dynamic allowances are specified, depending on the type of the rail fixing. (Ballast or direct fixing). These information
is taken from the LANE definition.
3-68
SOFiSTiK 2016
3.17.14
MLC Load trains of the STANAG are given in the sixth edition in appendix A.
There are the classes P1 = 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 30 up to 150. For every class
we have available:
P2 = 1 Values from column 4 (Single Axles)
P2 = 2 Values from column 2 (tracked vehicles)
P2 = 3 Values from column 3 (Wheeled vehicles)
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-69
3.18
Item
Description
TRPL
Unit
Default
[kN] 1190
0.0
PB
[kN] 1190
0.0
PW
[kN] 1190
0.0
PF
[kN] 1190
PFAC
0.0
DIST
LT
ABS
[m] 1001
0.0
DPOS
[m] 1001
0.0
DMIN
[m] 1001
0.0
DMAX
[m] 1001
0.0
[m] 1001
0.0
Y2
[m] 1001
HW
[m] 1001
0.0
ZW
[m] 1001
HW/2
HF
[m] 1001
0.0
PHI
[m] 1001
0.0
BW
[m] 1001
0.0
LW
[m] 1001
0.0
SNO
1/ sec
DAB
BOGI
/ kN
FRBO
1/ sec
DABO
WHEE
/ kN
FRWH
1/ sec
3-70
SOFiSTiK 2016
Item
Description
Unit
Default
DAWH
CONT
Contact node
A1
A2
> DPOS(4)
A3
A4
A5
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-71
PFSv2/gR
PW
hw
hs
Multiply longitudinal load value with value of design code (eg. EN),
16
the load is an area load, the total load value will be adopted to the
lane width
32
3-72
SOFiSTiK 2016
3.19
TRBL
Item
Description
Unit
Default
[kN/ m] 1191
0.0
PB
[kN/ m] 1191
0.0
PW
[kN/ m] 1191
0.0
PF
[kN/ m] 1191
PFAC
DIST
A
L
0.0
LT
ABS
[m] 1001
0.0
[m] 1001
0.0
LMAX
[m] 1001
LDEL
[m] 1001
0.0
[m] 1001
0.0
Y2
[m] 1001
HW
[m] 1001
0.0
ZW
[m] 1001
HW/2
HF
[m] 1001
0.0
PHI
[m] 1001
0.0
BW
[m] 1001
0.0
LW
[m] 1001
0.0
SNO
1/ sec
DAB
BOGI
/ kN
FRBO
1/ sec
DABO
WHEE
/ kN
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-73
Item
Description
Unit
Default
FRWH
1/ sec
DAWH
All load values will be treated as line loads in general. If the width of the load is
equal to the width of the train or option 16has been set, the load values will be
converted to a distributed load and applied on the current lane width. 12kN/m
distributed on 3m yield 4kN/m2, for a total lane width of 5m the resulting load
equals to 20kN/m. For standard load trains, the definition is taken from the code.
If the width B is smaller than the width, two line loads with the distance B will be
created. If only BW is defined, an area load is selected with a width BW less
than the width of the lane.
If only HW is specified a value for PW will be evaluated from the wind load given
with the load train wind definition.
Input values for multi-body-dynamics of line loads TRBL for record TREX will not
be used currently.
3-74
SOFiSTiK 2016
3.20
Item
Description
LCB
TYPE
TITL
SAVE
Unit
Default
Lt4
Lt32
The input of the loading occurs in the form of saving and evaluation cases. Each
saving case includes several evaluation cases CASE and optional superposition
rules of those evaluation cases COMB.
The value given here at LCB is added to the number of the case defined with
the record CALC.
Example:
CALC defines LMAX 12 and LMIN 11
1. Evaluation of the imposed loads in the construction stage (crane etc.)
SAVE 200
The load cases 211 and 212 are the result.
2. Evaluation of the imposed loads in the final stage
SAVE 250
The load case 261 and 262 are the result.
The action type and the designation of the resulting load cases may be specified
explicitly or be derived from the data saved with the load cases of the used load
trains automatically.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-75
3.21
Item
Description
NO
GRP
CASE
Unit
Default
Evaluation Case
Group of Loading
LT
The input of the loading within a saving case occurs in the form of evaluation
cases. Each case gets an identification number and contains the assignement
of load trains to individual lanes.
With the input of GRP one may specify literals for load groups according to the
EN 1991-2 or DIN Fachbericht. While without entry all loads are taken, the
possible values are:
GR0
GRU
GR1
GR2
GR2N
GR2F
GR2L
GR2T
GR20
GR3
GR4
GR5
GR11
...
GR17
GR21
...
GR27
GR31
The loading is generally done within the lanes only, but the load train may be
smaller than the lane or not all lanes will be loaded. Then we have the following
rules:
3-76
SOFiSTiK 2016
The residual loading area will be applied for a regular lane on the space
between the lane boundaries and the true traffic lane defined by the applied
load train. However for lane 0 all other defined lanes will be spared. An
automatic extension of the residual area is no longer applied.
A loading with group GR4 will apply the residual load on the total traffic area.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-77
3.22
POSL
Item
Description
Unit
Default
NO
Lane (lane_ident.nummer)
e.g. A1.3 = third lane of axis A1
Loadcase number of load train
LT
1.0
OPT
all
SMIN
SMAX
DEL
YEX
[m] 1001
TRAI
FACT
V
P
SYNC
Residual loading
default as spezified in TRAI
Synchronisation of load trains
ON
All trains move together
OFF
trains move individually
[km/ h] 1203
kN/ m2 1192
LT
*
*
OFF
With this record the loading within a lane for an evaluation case is defined. You
have to specify at TRAI the load case number of the defined load train and/or
the residual loading at P. Loadings outside of the defined lane width will not be
applied.
To specify the superposition of the loading for primary and secondary lanes
there are now the following possibilities:
The record CASE must be followed by the corresponding POSL records. Lanes
3-78
SOFiSTiK 2016
the load train can not stand in all positions of the influence line.
input of SMIN, SMAX but DEL not defined
In all other cases it is reasonable not to input any values for SMIN, SMAX, or
DEL. Only a single intervall may be used.
Load trains will be positioned at parallel locations in general. If independently
moving trains are required, this needs separate lanes in every case and either
separate geometries (eg. AXA.1 and AXB.1) or a special SYNC OFF definition. Variable load distances will then be applied as in the main lane. It should
be noted that for the case of favorable contributions of the synchronized load
trains, results may be on the unsafe side, especially for a classical load position
analysis.
For FE structures an eccentric loading (YEX) will produce accurate results only
in rare cases. It is strongly recommended to define an own lane for each load.
For lane 0 YEX is still used as an eccentricity for the total load train, but for all
other cases it is only used to define special effects of the loading like the position
of extra wide loadings or the load values of eccentric loaded railway trains.
Sometimes several further information is necessary for the evaluation and for
search of the extreme values. This is summarized in the item OPT.
OPT = OPTB + 4 OPTW + 16 OPTF + 32 OPT + 64 OPTE
+ 128 OPTS + 1024 OPTR
OPTB
0
1
2
3
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-79
OPTW
0
1
2
3
OPTF
0
1
OPTI
0
1
OPTE
0
1
OPTS
1
OPTR
0
1
Any loading may be eccentric within a given range within the lane. Especially for railway loadings this is a very important option to select the most
3-80
SOFiSTiK 2016
unfavorable eccentricity.
A loading may be subdivided in a right and left part based on the torsional
effect. For some evaluations (e.g. SLW) a single wheel may become effective
in those cases.
SOFiSTiK 2016
3-81
3.23
COMB
Item
Description
Unit
Default
TYPE
LT
L1
F1
1.0
L2
F2
1.0
L3
F3
1.0
L4
F4
1.0
L5
F5
1.0
L6
F6
1.0
L10
F10
1.0
...
The envelope of extreme values is calculated after the end of evaluation of all
the evaluating cases. Without COMB definitions each evaluation case is mutually exclusive. However for special cases it is possible to define intermediate
results with the COMB record which are then combined with variant superposition conditions.
Each intermediate result has a superposition rule assigned and is created from
3-82
SOFiSTiK 2016
up to ten basic evaluation cases with factors. If more than ten cases should be
combined, additional records with COMB F may be used for that purpose.
For the common case that a combination of multiple lanes is required with either
different type of load trains or with different global factors, an internal sorting
may be performed by specifying a range of case numbers "cmin:cmax". In that
case only loadings are considered not having loads in any already loaded lane.
Examples:
COMB A0 F1 1.0 F2 0.6 F3 0.4
Example:
A railway bridge with 3 tracks and 2 spans with 8.00 and 12.00 m length
has to be analyzed. According to DS 804 are to be examined:
2 tracks with UIC 71
100% or
71% or
2 tracks with SW
100% or
The following input is possible for the definition and the superposition of the four
combinations based on nine evaluation cases:
LC 1001
LC 1002
LC 1003
CASE 1
CASE 2
CASE 3
CASE 4
CASE 5
CASE 6
CASE 7
CASE 8
CASE 9
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
SOFiSTiK 2016
TRAI
TRAI
TRAI
POSL
PSOL
POSL
POSL
POSL
POSL
POSL
POSL
POSL
UIC
SW
SSW
1 1001
2 1001
3 1001
1 1002
2 1002
3 1002
1 1003
2 1003
3 1003
! UIC
! SW
! SSW
3-83
COMB
3-84
A0
A0
A0
A0
1:3 1.00
1 0.71 2
4:6 1.00
7:9 1.00
1:3 1.00
0.71 3 0.71
4:6 1.00
1:3 1.00
$
$
$
$
SOFiSTiK 2016
Output Description
The output of an influence line evaluation can become very extensive. Therefore
the use of the various ECHO options may be very helpful.
4.1
Lane Geometry
The geometry of the lanes can be controlled with ECHO LINE. The default output
results in a table for each lane with the following information in its headline:
DY
DZ
COORDINATES X,Y,Z
SECTION LENGTH
REMARKS
With ECHO LINE FULL one obtains a list of the neighbouring nodes at the lefthand side and to the right-hand side of the lane.
4.2
Influence Lines
PV-VALUE
SOFiSTiK 2016
PS-VALUE
PQ-VALUE
dPV/ds
Influence lines are plotted with a predetermined scale in the longitudinal direction and with a scale for the influence line values, which is determined by the
height of the drawing bands. Maximum and minimum values are printed at the
plot.
For the graphics of the transverse influence line, the sum of the influence values
of the the two wheels of the axle (Pv) and the integrals of the positive (p+)
and negative (p-) influence values are also given. The values r+ and r- are the
integrals of the residual areas outside the traffic lane.
4.3
Load Trains
The load trains are described in plain text with their parameters. The output of
the corresponding table can be suppressed with ECHO TYPL NO; with ECHO
TYPL FULL the table is expanded in order to show the generated loadings. This
table is also printed for user defined loadings by entering ECHO TYPL YES.
This table contains the following columns:
4-2
TYPE
Load type
E
Point load
E-0
Point load without dynamic factor
G
Distributed load
G-0
Distributed load without dynamic
factor
UDL
Distributed load with variable value
according to BS 5400
PV
PL
PW
SOFiSTiK 2016
PFUG
PFAK
Load position
LDEL
Load eccentricity
HW
HF
For loads with variable length the output of a second line with the maximum and
the minimum length and a possible subdivision length value in the column LDEL
follows.
The dynamic factors and the lane widths are output in an additional table. The
parameters therein mean:
4.4
STARTING
ENDING
PHIB
PHI2
PHIS
PHI4
LPHI
determinant length
YRA
YLA
YRE
YLE
Superposition Combinations
A table of the superposition combinations always appears when such combinations have been defined. A single line is printed for each combination containing
SOFiSTiK 2016
4-3
its type as well as the participated evaluation cases with their factors.
4.5
Evaluation Results
The evaluation results are controlled by the two ECHO options EVAL and RES.
When one of these two options is active, a line which contains the identification
of the position is printed for each position with corresponding influence lines.
As long as EVAL is active, the position of the load train as well as the possible
convoy distances or the variable lengths are output in a succeeding table.
If EVAL is set to FULL, the regions with different signs are printed then for each
evaluation case and for each lane together with the applied dynamic factors
PHI1/PHI2 for unfavourably/favourably acting loading and the positions of extreme values.
If RES is active, the extreme values of the internal forces or other parameters are
output in an additional table. The first columns contain the number, with which
the load case has to be stored, and a text for the designation the evaluation
rule.
4.6
Program Statistics
If the ECHO option STAT is used, one receives an output which shows the used
CPU time and the up to now needed memory allocation at the screen or in the
logfile for each part of the program. These values are important, in order to
allow an estimation of the memory and the CPU time requirements for larger
examples.
4-4
SOFiSTiK 2016