Study On Different Techniques of Partial Discharge (PD) Detection in Power Transformers Winding: Simulation Between Paper and EPOXY Resin Using UHF Method
Study On Different Techniques of Partial Discharge (PD) Detection in Power Transformers Winding: Simulation Between Paper and EPOXY Resin Using UHF Method
Study On Different Techniques of Partial Discharge (PD) Detection in Power Transformers Winding: Simulation Between Paper and EPOXY Resin Using UHF Method
I. INTRODUCTION
Partial discharges (PD) are one of the main causes of
deterioration of insulating material in power transformer
windings. Many researches already had been done to find PD
mechanism, the PD detection techniques, the relationship
between PD and the damage they cause to insulating materials
and insulating system, the location of PD sources and the
57 | 7 1
A.
B.
The acoustic method is very attractive alternative for online partial discharge detection in power transformers. The
transformer tank is grounded; therefore the sensors can be
placed in a safe way, over any point of any wall of transformer
tank in order to detect the acoustic emission of partial
discharges [5].
Acoustic signals from a PD source are immune from
electromagnetic noise. An acoustic signal from mechanical
vibration of PD can be detected by piezoelectric transducers,
fiber optic acoustic sensors, accelerometers, condenser
microphones and sound-resonance sensors usual using
frequency band as between 10 kHz and 300 kHz. Acoustic
emission detection has been successfully used in order to
localize the PD source inside of the test object due to the fact
that acoustic signal is strongly dependent upon the geometry of
the test object. This method is very efficient for localizing PD
source because of its immunity against electromagnetic noise
[7].
The primary problem with acoustic detection is the
complex nature of the acoustic wave propagation. Because
power transformers are not homogeneous devices, the waves
do not travel in perfect spherical wave fronts because the
source of PD is so small, it can be seen as an acoustic point
source. Due to the nature of wave propagation, point sources
lead to spherical wave fronts. Another difficulty with acoustic
detection is the required sensitivity. Classically, due to the
many attenuation mechanisms, received acoustic signals have
very low intensity and so sensors must be very responsive to
small changes in signal amplitude in order to detect a PD [8].
C.
58 | P a g e
TABLE II.
Advantages
Immunity against
electrical noise
Identification of PD
source
Complex design
UHF sensors
RF sensors
Antennas(Hilbert,
monopole, loop antenna
etc)
Optical
Immunity
against
electrical noise
Easy to measure
Provide critical
information
Go/No Go
decision
No information
about
magnitude of
PD
Disadvantages
High electromagnetic
interference
Advantages
Disadvantages
Possible
sensors
Main
application
area
Possible
sensors
Acoustic
High sensitivity
Immunity
against
electrical noise
Very efficient
for localization
of PD
Low signal
intensity
Piezo-electric
transducers
Inductive
Condenser
microphones
Transformers
GIS
Capacitive
Optical fiber
UV detector
Photomultiplier
tube
Transformer
GIS
Cables
Winding
Main
application
area
Antenna (Probe)
59 | P a g e
TABLE III.
From (mm)
To(mm)
57
80
-70
60
82
-75
V. RESULT
According to the above table, a short dipole antenna with
UHF Gaussian excitation is placed in a supposed PD location.
Then, the electromagnetic (EM) wave propagation from the
paper insulation of winding is simulated and recorded by the
probe position, which is placed at the position of the detecting
antenna. Typical location of antenna is listed in Table III and
Table IV. The electric field signals recorded by the probe for
supposed PD location at (x,y,z) coordinates (0,-150,-110) mm.
A.
Paper insulation
B.
Epoxy Resins
60 | P a g e
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
61 | P a g e