STRATEGIC PLAN 2016-2020: Modernization of The Philippine Geodetic Reference System
STRATEGIC PLAN 2016-2020: Modernization of The Philippine Geodetic Reference System
STRATEGIC PLAN 2016-2020: Modernization of The Philippine Geodetic Reference System
2/23/2016
PHILIPPINE GEODETIC REFERENCE SYSTEM
STRATEGIC PLAN 2016-2020
Contents
Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Existing Systems .............................................................................................................................................................. 4
Horizontal Control Network .................................................................................................................................... 4
Vertical Control Network .......................................................................................................................................... 6
Gravity Control Network .......................................................................................................................................... 6
The International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) and the International Terrestrial
Reference Frame (ITRF)............................................................................................................................................... 6
Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................................................................... 7
Strategies ........................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Densification of the PageNET ................................................................................................................................ 8
Development and Maintenance of the Philippine Geocentric Datum of 2016-- Alignment to the
ITRF/Migration to a Semi-Dynamic/Dynamic Geocentric Datum ............................................................ 8
Development, refinement and validation of the deformation model ..................................................... 9
Development and Maintenance of the Philippine Geodetic Vertical Datum 2020 (PGVD2020) 10
Strengthening of core competencies on geodetic reference frame development and
maintenance .............................................................................................................................................................. 10
Issues ................................................................................................................................................................................ 11
Implementation of Strategies.................................................................................................................................. 11
TIMELINE........................................................................................................................................................................ 13
Strategy for the densification of the PageNET ............................................................................................ 14
Strategy for the Alignment to a GGRF/Migration to Geocentric Datum............................................. 17
Strategy for the development, refinement and validation of the Deformation Model ................. 18
Strategy for the development and maintenance of the Philippine Geodetic Vertical Datum
2020 (PGVD2020).................................................................................................................................................... 20
Strategy for the legal and IEC requirements and Strengthening of core competencies on
geodetic reference frame development and maintenance ..................................................................... 20
Introduction
The National Mapping and Resource Information Authority (NAMRIA), as the key
agency mandated to establish and maintain the country’s geodetic control network, is
currently undertaking the modernization of the Philippine Geodetic Reference System.
The program is one of the core initiatives identified by the Agency as part of its strategic
objective to help create a geospatially empowered Philippines by 2020.
Meanwhile, the global community have seen a shift on how geospatial information
is acquired, managed and exchanged. There has been an increasing demand for a global
geodetic reference frame (GGRF) that will underpin all geospatial information. At the
same time, the past decades have seen the development of positioning technologies,
such as Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), that make possible the accurate
definition of, and easy utilization and connection to a GGRF. It is because of these
developments that the 69th session of the United Nation’s General Assembly approve
Resolution No. A/RES/69/266 calling on all member states to adopt and contribute to the
development of this GGRF in support to sustainable development.
These changes have made the modernization of the Philippine Geodetic Reference
System the next logical step for NAMRIA to effectively respond to the needs of the
changing times.
Existing Systems
At present, the geodetic reference primarily in use is the PRS92 and local definition
of World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84) for geometric positioning, and the mean sea
level (MSL) and Philippine Geoid Model 2014 (PGM2014) for elevation measurements.
PRS92 is a local geodetic datum established using the Global Positioning System
(GPS) under the Geodetic Survey Component of the Natural Resources Management and
Development Project (NRMDP), an undertaking in partnership with the government of
Australia. It was designed to be the reference framework for all surveying and mapping
that will replace the primary triangulation network of the country established by the US
Coast and Geodetic Survey from 1901-1927, whose accuracy was found by NRMDP to be
less than third order based on the current standards.
The PRS92 comprised of 471 1st to 3rd order stations, 84 of which were common
to the triangulation network. It retained most of the parameters of the old Luzon Datum
of 1911 to minimize the changes in the coordinates, and introduced a geoid-spheroid
separation at the origin in Balanacan, Marinduque.
A local definition of WGS84 in its original state (WGS84 Doppler) was used to
facilitate the processing of the GPS baselines and adjustment of the network. The local
definition of the WGS84 is estimated to approximate WGS84 to within six meters in
latitude, longitude and height (Jones, 1991). To relate the WGS84 to the modified Luzon
Datum (PRS92), a set of transformation parameters were likewise developed using
twenty-nine common stations.
The adoption of PRS92 as the standard reference system for surveying and
mapping activities was mandated through Executive Order No. 45, series of 1991. This
law was subsequently amended, the latest being Executive Order No. 321 series of 2004,
extending the deadline for the full adoption of the new system until 2010. However,
problems with integrating existing land survey datasets into PRS92 have resulted to users
still referring to the old Luzon Datum for their surveying and mapping. Regional
environment and natural resources offices, which are mandated to undertake the data
integration, have experienced difficulties in integrating the old cadastral datasets due to
the inconsistencies and errors in the old surveys.
Complicating the matter is the presence of active ground deformations that affect
the integrity of the national geodetic control network. The Philippines is located in a
tectonically-active region that is subject to an average crustal drift of 2cm/year, not to
mention the local distortions brought about by earthquakes. PRS92, being a local and
static datum, fails to account for this distortion.
This limitation has constrained the applicability of PRS92 to meet the requirements
of all sectors. As a result, different thematic information is still referred to different
systems which are, in turn, inconsistent with the whole concept of PRS92: a standard and
homogeneous reference system for surveying and mapping activities in the country.
The vertical control network is referred to the mean sea level and its bench marks
(BMs) are propagated using geodetic levelling techniques. Started by the US Coast and
Geodetic Surveys in the early 1900s, the level network was subsequently densified in the
following decades with intermittent levelling campaigns carried out throughout the
islands. Most of the bench marks were originally reckoned from the primary tide gauge
bench mark located in Manila Harbor (i.e. BM-66), but other tidal bench marks were
established throughout the country to serve as reference for the level network.
During the PRS92 Campaign from 2007 to 2012, 22,851 Benchmarks were
established along major roads nationwide. These first order level networks were
connected to their respective reference tidal BMs to provide local MSL elevation.
With the advent of GNSS, it has become much easier to estimate MSL elevations
using a geoid model. Applying a geoid model in GNSS surveys will eliminate the conduct
of levelling. On October 28, 2014 with the assistance of Denmark Technical University
(DTU-Space) and National Geospatial Intelligence Agency (NGIA), a preliminary geoid
model has been computed for the country (Philippine Geoid Model of 2014, PGM2014)
with an accuracy of 0.30meters.
SLR/LLR. It is closely aligned to the World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84) to within
the centimetre level. Throughout the years, different ITRF realizations have been made,
the latest being ITRF2014. The differences in the coordinates between realizations are
attributed mainly to crustal deformations and tectonic plate motions.
Strategies
To achieve these goals and objectives, NAMRIA has come up with the following
strategies:
In line with the modernization of the Philippine Geodetic Reference System, more
stations are targeted for establishment in order to improve the quality, availability and
reliability of positioning services being provided to PageNET’s stakeholders.
A geocentric reference system such as the ITRF is deemed better suited to meet
the positioning needs of the public and private sector in the country. While it is the
consensus that going geocentric is the next step, considerable discussion has taken place
on the specific type of datum to be adopted i.e. static, semi-dynamic or dynamic. A static
datum is where the coordinates are fixed at a reference epoch and does not take into
account the effects of plate tectonics. It is the simplest of the three types of datum,
however, the integrity of the datum degrades over time since the coordinates do not
change in tandem with the real world conditions.
Like the static datum, a semi-dynamic datum is also fixed to a reference epoch but
makes use of a deformation model to incorporate the effects of plate tectonics and ground
deformation on the coordinates. The resulting coordinates are propagated back to the
fixed reference epoch for seamless integration into the old spatial data. In this datum
type precision of spatial data analysis and its control network is maintained. Dynamic
datums, meanwhile, have reference coordinates that change continuously. It overcomes
the limitations of unmodelled deformation in positioning but still have to make use of a
deformation model to integrate spatial data acquired over a long period of time.
Both semi-dynamic and dynamic datums are dependent on the accuracy of the
deformation model. It requires all coordinates to be time-tagged and may cause
confusion to users, particularly laymen.
Based on the consultation with stakeholders, the choice was pared down to two
options:
1. Migrate to geocentric datum and stay static for the next three (3) to five (5) years.
In the meantime, develop a deformation model that would best fit the geodynamic
behaviour of the country. After this period, decide to go semi-dynamic or fully
dynamic.
2. Adopt a fully dynamic geocentric datum and update the coordinates whenever a
new ITRF realization is published.
After due deliberation, Option 1 was deemed to be the best choice for the
migration to geocentric datum.
With the advent of GNSS, ellipsoidal heights can be reduced to MSL elevations
using a geoid model. In October 2014, a new preliminary geoid model for the Philippines
has been computed from airborne and land gravity data, supplemented with marine
satellite altimetry data, and data from the newest GOCE mission. The Philippine Geoid
Model 2014 (PGM2014) has a general accuracy of about 30 cm on average across the
country. This model can be refined into a 10-cm geoid by establishing additional land
gravity stations, re-computation and validation. The recomputed geoid (PGM2020) will
be fitted to the levelling benchmarks in order to be consistent with the existing vertical
datum. This MSL-based geoid will be called Philippine Geodetic Vertical Datum 2020
(PGVD2020).
With the shift in how geodetic control networks are realized and maintained, there
is a need to enhance skills set on geodetic reference frame development and
maintenance. This holds true not just for NAMRIA’s technical personnel, but also the
direct implementers of the new reference system, as well as for other stakeholders, such
as the academe and the private sector.
Issues
Implementation of Strategies
1. Academe
University of the Philippines – Department of Geodetic Engineering
Feati University – Department of Geodetic Engineering
2. Government
National Mapping and Resource Information Authority
Lands Management Bureau
National Mapping and Resource Information Authority
P a g e | 11
NAMRIA Five-Year Strategic Plan 2016-2020
In light of this, a five-year implementation plan (figure 1) has been prepared for
the migration of the primary geodetic reference system with the application of a semi-
dynamic/dynamic correction.
TIMELINE
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Onwards
Development and Maintenance of the Philippine Geodetic Vertical Datum 2020 (PGVD2020)
Amendment of
Revision of surveying and related regulations
enabling law
Research And Development, Preparation and publication of technical manuals and guidelines
The assignment of the stations to different tiers takes into account the zonification
(figure 3) of the archipelago based on the crustal velocity field defined by Rangin, et. al.
The additional stations to be established after 2016 (figure 4) are intended to improve
the development of the deformation model, and at the same time, enhance the quality
of the real time positioning service of the PageNET.
1. By 2020, surveyors can use the 200 Active Geodetic Stations as reference in
Network RTK Surveys nationwide
2. PageNET stations can be used in Geodynamic applications starting 2018
Alignment of the country’s geodetic reference system to the ITRF at epoch 2016
will start with the processing of one-month GNSS data gathered from the PageNET. The
solution will be constrained using at least six IGS sites surrounding the archipelago, see
figure 5 for the process workflow.
The sixty four (64) zero-order control points has been re-observed in 2015. This
will update the original observations conducted in 2008-2009 and align the network to
ITRF by using the PageNET stations as reference.
First and second order GCPs will be unified and re-observed to relate the
horizontal control network to ITRF. Lower-order (3rd-4th order) and all GCPs used as
reference in Cadastral surveys will be re-observed by DENR regional survey and mapping
divisions and later adjusted using the first and second order GCPs as reference.
1. New updated 4D coordinates of Zero, First and Second Order GCPs in ITRF
has been computed by 2018
2. Transformation parameters relating PRS92 and the ITRF has been computed
and published by 2018
3. New accuracy standards on geodetic networks will be employed in the GCP
certifications starting 2018
other special cases such as localized events (e.g. earthquakes and presence of structures
within a defined block) are also subject for research.
The appropriately placed active geodetic stations will define the crustal blocks of
the detailed deformation model. Close coordination between NAMRIA and Phivolcs is
needed to ensure the optimum design of the network, and guarantee the accuracy and
reliability of the computed model, and ultimately the results of future surveys.
Check points shall also be established in strategic locations all over the country.
These points shall serve as validation sites to assess the accuracy of the computed model.
Deformation of these check points, within and across blocks, have to be ascertained to
verify the definition of the block boundaries. The model is deemed acceptable if the
surveyed coordinates of the check points is within 5cm of the model.
In terms of implementation, it has been agreed that Phivolcs shall provide NAMRIA
with an annual velocity map for the whole Philippines. NAMRIA, for its part, shall process
the coordinates of all its AGS, and furnish Phivolcs with the final daily solutions for
incorporation into the deformation model. Based on the velocity map provided, NAMRIA
shall assess and publish, if needed, the updated coordinates of all its GCPs. The academic
partners, on the other hand, shall undertake research studies on topics relevant to crustal
deformation and its impact to surveying and mapping, and to the modernization of the
PGRS as a whole. A Memorandum of Understanding among the participating
organizations shall be drafted to cover this agreement.
1. There are Active Stations established at each crustal block boundaries per province
by 2019
2. Check points have been identified for deformation model validation by 2018
3. Research paper topics have been identified by 2017
4. Validated Velocity Map and Corrections have been published by 2020
More land gravity stations are targeted for installation in order to develop
PGVD2020. The aim is to cover the 1635 cities and municipalities in the country, with
around 25 gravity stations established for each city/municipality from 2015 – 2020. These
land gravity stations will be levelled to provide elevation and surveyed by gravimeter and
GNSS to position the points. The data from the GNSS/Levelling survey will be used to fit
the geoid to the local MSLs of the country. This will keep the existing vertical datum of
the country and establish the Philippine Geodetic Vertical Datum 2020 (PGVD2020).
1. By 2020, 25 gravity stations at each of the 1635 cities and municipalities have
been established and surveyed by gravimeter and GNSS nationwide
2. There is an annual recomputed Philippine Geoid from 2016 until 2020
3. The PGVD2020 have been developed which is a refined MSL- based geoid model
with 10cm or better accuracy by 2020
Strategy for the legal and IEC requirements and Strengthening of core
competencies on geodetic reference frame development and maintenance
There is a need to amend Executive Order No. 45, which mandates the adoption
of PRS92 as the standard for surveying and mapping in the country as early as 2016.
This enabling law will be the first step towards standardizing the use of ITRF as the
geodetic reference system.
Starting 2017, training courses for the DENR regional offices and other
stakeholders need to be conducted to educate them on the new concept of a geocentric
and semi-dynamic/dynamic datum and how it will affect their survey operations.
Information campaigns are also necessary to disseminate and discuss issues relevant to
the modernization.
For the long term, it is recommended that the curriculum for Geodetic Engineering
and allied disciplines be revised.