Prater Vol 8 284 1958
Prater Vol 8 284 1958
Prater Vol 8 284 1958
ss Ltd
CHARLES D. PRATER
Socony Mobd 011 Company, Inc Research and Development Laboratory l’aulsboro, New Jersey, IJ.S A
Abstract-Heat of reactron ~111 cause a temperature drfference to occur between the tnslde
and boundary of a porous partmle durmg an Internal reactron An equatmn IS derrved relating
tlus temperature difference to the reactant concentratron dfference, and It IS shown to be
mdependent of the kmetlcs of the reactron and of the partmle geometry Examples are grven of
the apphcatron of thrs equatron to yclohexane dehydrogenatron and catalyst regeneratron.
R&mm&-La chaleur de reactron prodmra une difference de temperature entre la surface lumte
et l’mteneur de partmules poreuses, au tours de r&ctxons au sem de cette partrcule Une equation
est obtenue etabhssant la relation entre cette dlfferenee de temperature et la dlff’trence de concen-
tratron des composes reagrssant Elle est lnd~pen~n~ de la cmetrque de la r&u&on et de la
forme geometnque des partzcules Les exemples d’apphcatron de cette &matron sont don&
pour Is desydrogenatron du cyrlohexane et la regeneratron de eatalyseurs
Zusammenfassung-Die Reaktronswarme erzeugt eme Temperaturdrfferenz zwrschen dem
Inneren und der Aussenselte emes porosen Tedchens wahrend emer mneren Reaktlon Es wnd
eme Glerchung abgeleltet, urn drese Temperatunhfferenz auf dre Konzentrations&fferenz des
Reaktanten zu bezrehen und es wnd gezelgt, dass sre unabhanglg von der Reaktronskmetrk
und der Terlchengeometrre 1st Fur die Anwendung dleser Glelchung werden als Bersprele die
Dehytierung von Cyclohexan und die Regeneration emes Katalysators behandelt
235
C-ES D. PRATER
10 wt. per cent alumma and with an average neghgble w&h respect to further conslderatlon
particle radius of 0 12 m The beads are gradually of thermal damage to the catalyst.
fouled with carbonaceous materials m the reactor The next reaction to be consldered 1s the
and m 2030 mm require regeneration by burning dehydrogenaCon of cyclohexane over a commer-
m air. Durmg burning, the temperature m the cial platmum-alumma reformmg catalyst. This
kiln may reach ‘760°C It becomes Important to 1s an endothernuc reactlon with a A H of
know how much the temperature wlthm the + 52 54 x lo3 Cal/mole at POO’C. The condl-
beads can exceed the external temperature, tions are 400°C reaction temperature, 4 : 1
because the beads can be damaged by tempera- hydrogen to hydrocarbon ratio and 25 atmos-
tures much m excess of 76O’C. pheres total pressure The values of the constants
Coke burning wlthm catalyst particles differs for this catalyst are -
from the stationary state problem discussed
D, = 15 6 x lo-’ cm/sec2 (cyclohexane at
above m that the reaction zone moves with time
POOYZ)
mto the catalyst. However, it can be shown
that for most cases of mterest equation (1) still K = 5 3 X lOA cal/sec cm “C.
applies. The condltlons for this are (1) that the The value of the eqmhbrmm concentration of
amount of oxygen required to fill the pores of yclohexane 1s calculated from free energy data
the catalyst 1s small compared to that required given by ROSSINI et al. [5]. The calculated
to burn the coke and (2) that the time It takes maximum temperature drop possible 1s found to
for maximum possible transient temperature be 53°C which will be qmte important m kmetlc
differences to decay to a neghglble quantity 1s studies Thus further study to determme the
small compared to the time it takes to burn the actual temperature dlstrlbutlon m the partlcles
carbon on the catalyst. These condltlons are may be desirable.
satisfied for the case to be discussed. The value In the above dlscusslon, the problem of the
of ?e for oxygen at 760°C, determmed by the measurement of the particle boundary tempera-
gas flow method discussed by WEISZ and PRATE~ ture has not been consldered exphcltly. Conven-
PIP is 4 6 x 10-s cm2/sec. The value of K, tionally, the temperature measuring device 1s
taken from the studies of thermal conductlvlty located externally to the particle. The question
of various catalysts by SEHR [4], 1s 8 6 x lOA then arises as to how well the temperature
Cal/cm set “C. The heat of burning (A 2%) 1s measured by the device represents the actual
that observed m practical luln operation and temperature of the particle boundary. A con-
has a value of - 83 x 10s Cal/mole. Equation slderatlon of the particular condltlons exlstmg
(1) then yields a maximum possible temperature m a given experiment 1s needed to answer this
difference of 1 1°C. This temperature rise 1s question.
REFERENCES
r11 DAME~ELER G Z. Phys Che-m 1943A193 16
M WHEELER A Catalyszs Vol. II (Edlted by P H EMMETT) ReInhold Pubhshlng Co , New York 1955
161 ROSSINI F D , PITZER K S , ARNETT R. L , BRAUN R M and PIMENTEL G. C. Selected Values of Physwal and
Thermodynamu: Properkes of Hydrocarbons awd Related Compounds Carnegie Press, Pittsburgh 1953
286