Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views

Midsem Model

1) The rocket uses two stages with efficiencies of 15% and specific impulses of 200s and 400s. 2) Using the constrained optimization method, the optimal staging ratios are found to be π1 = 0.00719 and π2 = 0.027. 3) With these staging ratios, the overall performance ratio π* is maximized at 0.00719.

Uploaded by

Saroj Shah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views

Midsem Model

1) The rocket uses two stages with efficiencies of 15% and specific impulses of 200s and 400s. 2) Using the constrained optimization method, the optimal staging ratios are found to be π1 = 0.00719 and π2 = 0.027. 3) With these staging ratios, the overall performance ratio π* is maximized at 0.00719.

Uploaded by

Saroj Shah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Mid-semester Examination AE 240/713/240M Thursday February 27, 2020

Weightage: 20% Time: 1100 – 1300 Hrs. Venue: LC301/LC302


Examination is closed Notes/Books. Only Calculator is permitted.
Model Solutions

Q.1 (a) Derive the expressions for V, (m/m0), ‘t’ and ‘x’ in respect of constant specific thrust (T = n0g)
gravity turn manoeuvre for the degenerate case of n0 = 1, using the following equations of motion. (Assume
constant sea-level gravity and zero drag. g0 = 9.81 m/s2). (4)

& 0 I sp
mg g sin θ dx
V& = − − g 0 cos θ ; θ& = 0 ; = V sin θ
m V dt

V& dV g0V (1 − cos θ ) dV cos θ 1


V& = g 0 (1 − cos θ ) → & = = → = − dθ +  dθ
θ dθ g 0 sin θ V sin θ sin θ

dV d (sin θ ) 1 sec
2 θ tan(θ 2)
 V = −  sin θ +  2 tan θ 2 dθ → ln V = ln cosecθ + ln tan(θ 2) + C ; V = k sin θ
2

V = k ' 1 + tan 2 θ  = k 'sec 2 θ ; k ' = V0 cos 2  0  ;


θ Vdθ 1 k 'sec
2 θ
( )
 ( )2  ( ) 2  2
2
 dt =  g0 sin θ + C = g0  sin θ dθ + C
k '  sec ( 2 )
 θ
2  θb
2ln ( tan (θ ) ) + sec (θ ) 
k' 
t=  + sec ( ) tan ( ) dθ + C → ∆t =
θ 2 θ 2
   2 
2g 0
 tan ( 2)
θ 2 2

2 g 2
0 θ0

 1 
dm 1 1  m0   1  m − ∆t
 I sp  dx
 m I sp 
= − dt → ln m = −
I sp
t + C ; ln   = 

 m   I sp 


∆ t ;
m0
= e  
;
dt
= V sin θ

1 k '2 k '2
 dx =
g0 
V 2
d θ =
g0 
sec 4 θ
2 ( )
d θ ; ∆ x =
g0 
( )
sec 2 θ 1 + tan 2 θ  dθ
2  ( )2 
k '2  2 θ 2
 = k '  2 tan θ + 2 tan 3 θ 
θb
∆x =
g0  
sec
2
d ( )
θ + tan 2 θ
2
sec 2 θ
2( ) ( )
d θ
θ0 g0  2 3 ( )
2  ( )
(b) A sounding rocket is launched at an angle of 60o from the local horizon with an initial velocity of 100m/s
and n0 = 1, and travels till it becomes parallel to local horizon of launch point. Determine the time taken and
the velocity achieved at this point. Also, how much fraction of propellant (mp/m0) having Isp = 250s will be
needed to complete the manoeuvre? (Use relations derived in (a) above as applicable.) (3)

V0 = 100m / s; θ 0 = 30o ; θb = 90o ; I sp = 300s; k ' = V0 cos2  0  = 100 × 0.93 = 93


θ

 2 
k' 93
( )
V = k 'sec 2 45o = 186m / s; ∆t =
2 g0
[2(0 + 0.549) + (2 − 1.333)] =
2 × 9.81
×1.765 = 8.36s

 1 
m0  ×8.36 mp
= e 250  = 1.034; = 0.033
mb m0

Q.2 A two-stage rocket is required to achieve a V* of 10000 m/s. Both stages use ε of 0.15. However, ‘Isp’
of stages I and II are 200s and 400s respectively.

(a) Determine πi’s of each stage, using the approximate constrained optimization method for maximizing π*
and also obtain its value. (Hint: Use following relations as needed. Use constraint to express π1 in terms of
π2. Also search for solution of π2 in the range of 0.025 and 0.030). (4)

ln π * = ln π1 + ln π 2 ; V* = − g 0  I sp1 ln (ε1 + {1 − ε1} π1 ) + I sp 2 ln (ε 2 + {1 − ε 2 } π 2 ) ; g 0 = 9.81m / s 2


10000
V* = 10000m / s; ε = 0.15; I sp1 = 200 s; I sp 2 = 400 s; ln [ 0.15 + 0.85π 1 ] = − − 2 × ln [ 0.15 + 0.85π 2 ]
200 × 9.81
0.00719
ln ( 0.15 + 0.85π 2 ) ( 0.15 + 0.85π 1 )  = −5.0968; π 1 =
2
− 0.1765
  ( 0.15 + 0.85π )
2
2

 0.00719  ∂π * 0.00719 0.0122


π* =  2
− 0.1765 × π 2 ; = 2
− 0.1765 − π 2 × 3
=0
 ( 0.15 + 0.85π 2 )  ∂π 2 ( 0.15 + 0.85π 2 ) ( 0.15 + 0.85π 2 )
3
0.00719 ( 0.15 + 0.85π 2 ) − 0.1765 ( 0.15 + 0.85π 2 ) − 0.0122π 2 = 0
15.08π 23 + 7.979π 22 + 2.246π 2 − 0.067 = 0 → π 2 = 0.0271; π1 = 0.0636; π * = 0.0017

(b) If the payload mass, m* is 2 Tons, determine the lift-off mass, m0, total mass of each of the two stages as
well as respective structural and propellant masses. (Hint: Use standard definitions of π and ε.) (3)

m*
π 2 = 0.028; π 1 = 0.061; π * = 0.0017; m0 = = 1161Tons
π*
mp 2 m p1 m*
+1 = + 1 = 6.667; 0.028 = → ms 2 + m p 2 = 69.4 → ms 2 = 10.4T ; m p 2 = 59.0T
ms 2 ms1 ms 2 + m p 2 + m*
71.4
0.061 = → ms1 + m p1 = 1099T → ms1 = 164.8T ; m p1 = 934.1T
71.4 + ms1 + m p1

Q.3 (a) Derive the expression for the propellant trade-off ratios, (δm*/δmpi) for both the stages of a two-stage
rocket. (3)
Hint: Use the following relations as applicable.
N N N m 
m0i = m* + m pi + msi +  (m sj + m pj ); m fi = m* + msi +  (m sj + m pj ); V* = g 0  I spi ln  0 i
 m fi 
j = i +1 j =i +1 i =1  

m01 m
V* = g 0 I sp1 ln + g 0 I sp 2 ln 02 ; m01 = m* + ms1 + m p1 + ms 2 + m p 2
mf 1 mf 2
m f 1 = m* + ms1 + ms 2 + m p 2 ; m02 = m* + ms 2 + m p 2 ; m f 2 = m* + ms 2
 ∂V* 
δ m*  ∂m pi   1 
=−
∂V*
; = g 0 I sp1  − 0
δ m pi  ∂V*  ∂m p1  m01 
 ∂m* 

∂V*  1 1   1 
= g 0 I sp1  −  + g 0 I sp 2  − 0
∂m p 2  m01 m f 1 
   m02 
 ∂V*   1 
  I sp1  
δ m* ∂m p1   m01 
|dV =0 − =−
δ m p1 *
 ∂V*   1 1   1 1 
 ∂m  I  −  + I  − 
 * sp1  m01 m f 1  sp 2  m02 m f 2
   

 ∂V*   1 1   1 
I sp1  −  + I sp 2  
 ∂m p 2   m01 m f 1 
δ m*     m02 
| =− =−
δ m p 2 dV* =0  ∂V*   1 1   1 1 
 ∂m  I  −  + I  − 
 * sp 1  m01 m f 1  sp 2
   m02 m f 2 
(b) Consider a two-stage rocket with the following configuration.

m p1 mp 2
= = 0.92; ms1 = 4450 kg ; I sp1 = 253s; ms 2 = 451kg ; I sp 2 = 280 s; m* = 2065kg
m p1 + ms1 m p 2 + ms 2

If the second stage fuel Isp is changed to 300s, how much additional payload can be carried, assuming ideal
burnout velocity to be constant? (Hint: all mass values remain same. Use the relations developed in (a)
above, as applicable). (3)

m p1 mp 2
= = 0.92; ms1 = 4450 kg ; I sp1 = 253s; ms 2 = 451kg ; I sp 2 = 280 s; m* = 2065kg
m p1 + ms1 m p 2 + ms 2
 1 1   1 
 ∂V*  I sp1  −  + I sp 2 
   
δ m* ∂m p 2   m01 m f 1   m02 
|dV* =0 = −  =− ; m p1 = 51175kg ; m p 2 = 5186.5kg
δ mp 2  ∂V*   1 1   1 1 
 ∂m*  I sp1  −  + I sp 2  − 
 m
 01 m f 1   m02 m f 2 
m01 = 63327.5kg ; m02 = 7702.5kg ; m f 1 = 12150.5kg ; m f 2 = 2516kg
δ m* 253 ( 0.000016 − 0.000082 ) + 280 ( 0.00013 ) 0.0197
|dV =0 I sp 2 = 280
=− = = 0.216
δ mp 2 *
253 ( 0.000016 − 0.000082 ) + 280 ( 0.00013 − 0.000397 ) 0.0912
δ m* 253 ( 0.000016 − 0.000082 ) + 300 ( 0.00013 ) 0.0223
|dV =0 I sp 2 = 300
=− = = 0.236
δ mp 2 *
253 ( 0.000016 − 0.000082 ) + 300 ( 0.00013 − 0.000397 ) 0.0945
δ m* = (0.236 − 0.216) × 5186.5 = 103.6kg

Note: Solutions, based on Isp related derivative or other consistent methodology, in the context of question,
are also admissible, as long as solutions are close to the above value.

PAPER ENDS

You might also like