Lecture 1
Lecture 1
Lecture 1
Lecture 1
Foreword
1 Complex analysis is one of the most beautiful fields of mathematics. It has numerous connections with
the most of modern branches of pure and applied mathematics: algebraic geometry, number theory, physics
(electrostatics, hydrodynamics, heat conduction), probability, combinatorics.
Historically, complex numbers were introduced in 16th century as a way to interpret the Cardano formula for
the roots of cubic polynomial x3 + px + q = 0:
s r s r
3 q q 2 p 3 3 q q2 p3
x= − + + + − − +
2 4 27 2 4 27
To obtain all 3 roots of the cubic equation we have to interpret the cubic root as a multivalued function with
values in C.
For several hundred years after Cardano complex numbers remained an obscure topic. It took several centuries
and efforts of the best mathematicians of their time (Euler, Gauss, Weierstrass, Schwarz, Cauchy, Abel and
many others) to demonstrate the fascinating nature of complex numbers and complex analysis, and build the
ground for modern applications.
Definitions
Let i denote the imaginary unit defined by the property
i 2 = −1.
√
Sometimes element i is called the square root of −1 and denoted by −1. We define the complex numbers C by
adjoining element i to the field of real numbers:
Definition 1. Complex numbers C := R[ii ] is the vector space over R spanned by 1 and i , i.e., it is the set of all
linear combinations
a + i b, a, b ∈ R.
a and b are called real and imaginary parts of a complex number z = a + i b:
a = <(z), b = =(z).
(a + i b) + (c + i d) = (a + c) + i (b + d).
Moreover, using the defining property of i there is a unique way to turn C into a commutative ring by defining
multiplication as
(a + i b)(c + i d) = ac + i ad + i bc + i 2 bd = (ac − bd) + i (ad + bc).
Complex numbers of the form z = a+ii 0 are called purely real and are abbreviated as z = a. The neutral elements
in C with respect to addition is z = 0, and the neutral element with respect to multiplication is z = 1.
The key feature of C is that it is also a field, i.e., we can not only add up, subtract and multiply complex
numbers, but also can divide by nonzero elements:
!
1 a −ib a −ib a b
= = = +i − 2 .
a + i b (a + i b)(a − i b) a2 + b2 a2 + b2 a + b2
By the very definition of C, the quadratic polynomial x2 + 1, which is irreducible over R, now has two roots
over C: x = ±ii .
1 Large part of these notes is borrowed from the lectures by Antoine Cerfon.
Yury Ustinovskiy Complex Variables MATH-GA.2451-001 Fall 2019
Exercise 1. Prove that any quadratic polynomial with real coefficients has two complex roots (counting with
multiplicities).
Theorem 2 (Fundamental Theorem of Algebra). Any polynomial p(x) ∈ C[x] of degree n > 1 with complex coeffi-
cient can be factored as
p(x) = an (x − z1 )(x − z2 ) . . . (x − zn ),
i.e., p(x) has exactly n roots over C (with multiplicities).
There exist many proofs o the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, but the quickest and the most beautiful
proofs can be obtained with the use of complex analysis. We will discuss three of them later in this course.
Exercise 2. Let M ⊂ Mat2 (C) be the set of 2 × 2 matrices:
( ! )
a b
M= a, b ∈ R .
−b a
(a) Prove that M is closed under matrix addition and multiplication (+, ×).
(b) Show that (M, +, ×) is isomorphic to the field of complex numbers.
Conjugation
In computing the multiplicative inverse of z = a + i b we used the complex conjugate of z defined as
z := a − i b
• conjugations is involutive: z = z
• z · z is a positive real number, unless z = 0.
• conjugation is an additive and multiplicative automorphism of C:
z+w = z+w
z·w = z·w
Remark 3. As a corollary of the last property we conclude that if w ∈ C is a root of a polynomial p(x) =
xn + an−1 xn−1 + · · · + a1 x + a0 with real coefficients, i.e., p(w) = 0, then w is also a root:
This observation implies that all complex, not purely real roots a polynomial with real coefficients come in
conjugate pairs: w and w. Combining this observation with the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra we conclude
that any polynomial with real coefficients of degree n > 1 can be factored as a product of linear and quadratic
factors: Y Y
p(x) = an (x − xi ) · (x2 + pi x + qi ).
i
z+z z−z
<(z) = =(z) =
2 2ii
√
We define modulus |z| of z = a + i b by the identity |z|2 = zz. Clearly |z| = a2 + b2 . Properties of conjugation
imply that
|z1 · z2 | = |z1 | · |z2 |,
i.e., | · | : C → R>0 is a multiplicative homomorphism.
Yury Ustinovskiy Complex Variables MATH-GA.2451-001 Fall 2019
Complex plane
It is convenient to picture complex numbers z = a +ii b as points (or zero-rooted vectors) on the Cartesian plane
R2 with coordinate axes√ <(z) and =(z). This way the modulus of z = a + i b has a clear interpretation as
the Euclidean length a2 + b2 of the corresponding vector. Addition of complex numbers translates into the
addition of the underlying vectors.
= =
z1 z
z1 + z2 ρ(z)
ϕ(z)
< <
z2
Instead of Cartesian coordinates <(z) and =(z) on R2 we can consider polar coordinates (ρ(z), ϕ(z)) such that
for z = a + i b we have
a = ρ cos ϕ, b = ρ sin ϕ
z = ρ(cos ϕ + i sin ϕ).
Number ρ(z) = |z| is the modulus of a complex number and number ϕ(x) ∈ [0, 2π) is the argument. Of course
the choice of the range for the argument function is somewhat arbitrary and could be chosen to be, e.g., (−π, π]
instead.
Exercise 3. Prove that for angles ϕ and ψ we have
(cos ϕ + i sin ϕ)(cos ψ + i sin ψ) = cos(ϕ + ψ) + i sin(ϕ + ψ).
Topology on C
Complex plane has a natural topology, i.e., a collection of open subsets U ⊂ C:
Definition 4. Subset U ⊂ C is called open if for any z ∈ U there exists > 0 such that the open ball B (z) :=
{w ∈ C | |z − w| < } is contained in U .
Now, once we have endowed C with a structure of a topological space, we can define continuous functions
on C. We will make it explicit in our next class.
If z1 = ρ1 ei ϕ1 and z2 = ρ2 ei ϕ2 then z1 z2 = ρ1 ρ2 ei (ϕ1 +ϕ2 ) , i.e., under multiplication of two complex numbers their
arguments add up and their moduli multiply. A particularly useful consequence of this fact is de Moivre’s
formula. For n ∈ Z:
(cos ϕ + i sin ϕ)n = cos(nϕ) + i sin(nϕ)
Using de Moivre’s formula we can also find nth root of a complex number z. Namely, if z = ρei ϕ , then there are
precisely n numbers
ϕ 2πk
w = ρ1/n ei ( n + n ) , k = 0, . . . , n − 1
satisfying wn = z. A particular important case is z = 1 which yields n roots of unity:
2π
1, ω, ω2 , . . . , ωn−1 , ω := ei n .
Yury Ustinovskiy Complex Variables MATH-GA.2451-001 Fall 2019
=
ω2 n=9
ω3
ω1
ω4
ω0 <
ω5
ω8
ω6
ω7
b = C ∪ {∞}
Riemann sphere C
Instead of the complex plane C, we will often need to consider the one-point compactification of C.
Definition 5. Riemann sphere Cb as a set, is the complex plane C together with a point ∞ at “infinity”. We turn
C into a topological space by taking as open sets all the open subsets U of C together with V = (C\K) ∪ {∞},
b
where K ⊂ C is compact (closed and bounded).
b with two charts U1 ' C and U2 ' C such that U1 ∩ U2 = C\{0} and gluing them along the maps
We can cover C
C ← C\{0} → C
z →7 z 7→ z−1 .
The geometric intuition for considering the Riemannian sphere is provided by stereographic projection which
we ‘define’ using a picture:
proj(P )
S2
Namely, given a unit sphere S2 in R3 which intersects the complex plane {z = 0} in the unit circle we project any
point P ∈ S2 on the sphere onto the plane from the north pole N . Projection proj : S2 \{N } → C is well-defined
everywhere except for the north pole N . By adding a point ∞ to the complex plane, and setting proj(N ) = ∞,
we extend stereographic projection to a continuous bijective map between S2 and C. b
fb: C
b → C.
b