Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 866 views

    #406 Maintenance On Main Engine

    Uploaded by

    Tolias Egw
    This risk assessment document evaluates the risks associated with routine maintenance on the main engine of a ship. It identifies 5 potential hazards: 1) immobilization of the main engine, 2) lack of knowledge and skills, 3) lack of spares, 4) wrong assembly after overhauling, and 5) slips, trips, and falls. For each hazard, it analyzes the potential risks, existing controls to mitigate the risks, resulting risk rating, additional recommended controls if needed, and residual risk rating after implementing all controls. The overall goal is to reduce all risks to as low as reasonably practicable.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    #406 Maintenance On Main Engine

    Uploaded by

    Tolias Egw
    866 views3 pages
    This risk assessment document evaluates the risks associated with routine maintenance on the main engine of a ship. It identifies 5 potential hazards: 1) immobilization of the main engine, 2) lack of knowledge and skills, 3) lack of spares, 4) wrong assembly after overhauling, and 5) slips, trips, and falls. For each hazard, it analyzes the potential risks, existing controls to mitigate the risks, resulting risk rating, additional recommended controls if needed, and residual risk rating after implementing all controls. The overall goal is to reduce all risks to as low as reasonably practicable.

    Original Description:

    #406 Maintenance on Main Engine

    Original Title

    #406 Maintenance on Main Engine

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This risk assessment document evaluates the risks associated with routine maintenance on the main engine of a ship. It identifies 5 potential hazards: 1) immobilization of the main engine, 2) lack of knowledge and skills, 3) lack of spares, 4) wrong assembly after overhauling, and 5) slips, trips, and falls. For each hazard, it analyzes the potential risks, existing controls to mitigate the risks, resulting risk rating, additional recommended controls if needed, and residual risk rating after implementing all controls. The overall goal is to reduce all risks to as low as reasonably practicable.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    866 views3 pages

    #406 Maintenance On Main Engine

    Uploaded by

    Tolias Egw
    This risk assessment document evaluates the risks associated with routine maintenance on the main engine of a ship. It identifies 5 potential hazards: 1) immobilization of the main engine, 2) lack of knowledge and skills, 3) lack of spares, 4) wrong assembly after overhauling, and 5) slips, trips, and falls. For each hazard, it analyzes the potential risks, existing controls to mitigate the risks, resulting risk rating, additional recommended controls if needed, and residual risk rating after implementing all controls. The overall goal is to reduce all risks to as low as reasonably practicable.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    AKRON RISK ASSESSMENT R/A NO : 406

    TYPE OF ACTIVITY: ROUTINE / NON- DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY : MAINTENANCE ON MAIN ENGINE


    ROUTINE

    RISK ASSESSMENT GUIDE : RISK MUST BE REDUCED TO AS LOW AS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE (ALARP)
    STEP 1 : CONSIDER SEVERITY OF HARM (S) STEP 2 : CONSIDER LIKELIHOOD (L) STEP 3:CALCULATE RISK
    1: NEGLIGIBLE: Near Miss or Simple First Aid/ Simple Repairs by ship staff/ Spill within spill trays 1: IMPROBABLE-Event not expected to occur RISK RATING RR = S x L
    2: MINOR : Injury require Medical Treatment; MTC/ Repair need external assistance / Spill on deck < 1 m3 2 : RARE: Expected to occur in exceptional situations RR RISK CATEGORY
    MODERATE: Serious injury or multiple minor injuries; LTI / Repairs affecting seaworthiness of ship leading to CoC / Spill on
    3: 3: POSSIBLE: May occur at some time / occurred in the past
    deck > 1 m3 1- 5 L - LOW
    CRITICAL : Single fatality, Serious injuries, permanent disability / Requires lay up repairs or extensive drydockings, 3rd
    4: 4: LIKELY : Possibility of occurrence of isolated incidents
    party claims/ Spill overboard < 100L 6 - 10 M - MEDIUM
    CATASTROPHIC : Mutiple Fatalaities or Long Term disabilities/ Total Loss of ship or immediate layup/dry-docking for major
    5: 5: CERTAIN: Is expected to occur in most situations
    repairs / Major overboard spill > 100 L 11 - 25 H - HIGH

    NO HAZARD DESCRIPTION RISK EXISTING CONTROLS RISK RATING RISK ADDITIONAL CONTROLS RESIDUAL RISK RESI-
    (WITH CONTROLS IN CATEG (IF NOT REQUIRED, WRITE "N". RATING DUAL
    PLACE)
    L/M/H IF REQUIRED, LIST OUT THE ADDITIONAL (WITH ADDIT'L RISK
    CONTROLS ) CONTROLS)
    CAT.
    ( S x L= RR) (S x L = RR) L/M/H
    S L RR S L RR
    1. Immobilization of Main Engine 1. Main Engine 1. Main Engine immobilization to be only done in 4 2 8 M As far as practical carry out the 4 1 4 L
    cannot be used in calm weather and area away from busy traffic route. maintenance at anchorage
    an emergency if 2. In Port or at anchor, permission from port
    required. authorities to be taken prior immobilisation.
    3. Port requirements to be complied with.
    4. Weather forecasts to be regularly taken.
    2. Lack Of Knowledge & skills 1. Improper 1. Competent crew on board. 2 2 4 L N
    Maintenance.
    2. Damage to 2. Follow Makers instructions for over haul..
    machinery
    3. Injury to crew 3. Pre work meeting to be carried out.
    4. Senior Engineer in attendance through out the
    maintenance
    5. Sufficient manpower available.

    FORM NO: S-20 / REV. 0 / 01 MAR 2010 Page 1 / 3 R/A NO :406


    NO HAZARD DESCRIPTION RISK EXISTING CONTROLS RISK RATING RISK ADDITIONAL CONTROLS RESIDUAL RISK RESI-
    (WITH CONTROLS IN CATEG (IF NOT REQUIRED, WRITE "N". RATING DUAL
    PLACE)
    L/M/H IF REQUIRED, LIST OUT THE ADDITIONAL (WITH ADDIT'L RISK
    CONTROLS ) CONTROLS)
    CAT.
    ( S x L= RR) (S x L = RR) L/M/H
    S L RR S L RR
    3. Lack of spares 1. Improper or 1. Minimum spares for critical machinery available 2 2 4 L N
    Incomplete on board at all times.
    Maintenance
    2. Maintenance carried out only when spares
    available on board.
    4. Wrong Assembly of equipment after 1. Damage to 1. Manuals referred prior commencing the job and 2 2 4 L N
    overhauling. machinery execution closely monitored by Senior staff of
    /Delays/AE engine room.
    Failure
    5. Slips, Trips & Falls 1. Injury to 1. Proper PPE to be used by all personnel. 2 2 4 L N
    Personnel
    2. Sufficient lighting available in the area.
    3. Area free of any tripping hazards. / oil.
    4. Sufficient manpower available for the job.
    5. Lock out / Tag out procedures to be followed.
    6. Pre work meeting to be carried out.

    FORM NO: S-20 / REV. 0 / 01 MAR 2010 Page 2 / 3 R/A NO :406


    NO HAZARD DESCRIPTION RISK EXISTING CONTROLS RISK RATING RISK ADDITIONAL CONTROLS RESIDUAL RISK RESI-
    (WITH CONTROLS IN CATEG (IF NOT REQUIRED, WRITE "N". RATING DUAL
    PLACE)
    L/M/H IF REQUIRED, LIST OUT THE ADDITIONAL (WITH ADDIT'L RISK
    CONTROLS ) CONTROLS)
    CAT.
    ( S x L= RR) (S x L = RR) L/M/H
    S L RR S L RR
    6. Use of Lifting Appliances 1. Damage to 1. Thorough visual inspection of E/R crane, chain 3 1 3 L N
    machinery. blocks, wire slings & shackles prior use.
    2. Injury to 2. Qualified & trained operator to handle the crane.
    personnel.
    3. A signalling man will be used who should be in
    direct line of sight with the crane operator.
    4. Pre work meeting to be carried out.
    7. Crew Fatigue 1. Injury to 1. Rest hours as prescribed by company and STCW 3 1 3 L N
    crew/accident. complied.

    Final Asesssment : Provided no deviations from the recommended control measures, the residual risk assessed is As Low As Resonably Practicable (ALARP).
    Supplementary measures include correct use of PPE & Tool Box talks that ensure all workers are fully aware of the control measures.

    Residual risk - HIGH : If RR is "High" category, written instructions for conducting the job and approval shall be obtained from the shore office to commence the operation.
    Residual risk - MEDIUM: If RR is "Medium" , a constant monitoring of events shall be maintained and ensure all identified preventative and mitigating measures are always in place.

    PREPARED BY: TECH. DEPT , S & Q DEPT. APPROVED BY: S & Q MANAGER
    01 03 2010

    FORM NO: S-20 / REV. 0 / 01 MAR 2010 Page 3 / 3 R/A NO :406

    You might also like