Standard Method of Test for

Surface Resistivity Indication of

Concrete's Ability to Resist
Chloride lon Penetration

AASHTO Designation: TP 95-11

AASHO
TE VOoE Or TANOPOR ATION

1. SCOPE

1.1. This test method covers the determination of the electrical resistiviy of water-saturated concrete
to provide arapid indication of its resistance to the penetration of chloride ions. This test method
is applicable to types of concrete where correlations have been established between this test
procedure and long-term chloride diffusion procedurcs such as those described in ASTMC 1556.
Examples of such corelations are discussed in the reference shown in Section 15.2.
1.2. The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard.

1.3. This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, ifany, associated with its use.
It is the regonsibility ofthe user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and healh
practices and deermine the appicability ofrgulatory limüations prior to use.

2. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS
2.1. AASHTO Standards:
R39, Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory
T23, Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field
T 24M/T 24, Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete
T277, Electrical Indication of Concrete's Ability to Resist Chloride lon Penetration
2.2. ASTM Standards:

C670, Standard Practice for Preparing Precision and Bias Statements for Test Methods for
Construction Materials
C1202, Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete'sAbility to Resist
Chloride lon Penetration
C1556, Standard Test Method for Determining the Apparent Chloride Diffusion Coefficient
of Cementitious Mixtures by Bulk Diffusion
3. SUMMARY OF TEST METHOD
3.1. This test method consists of measuring the resistivity of 200-mm (8-in.) or 300-mm (12-in.)
nominal length and 100-mm (4-in.) or I50-mm (6-in.) nominal diameter cylinders or cores by use
ofa4-pin Wenner probe array. An alternating current (AC) potential difference is applied by the
surface resistivity apparatus at the outer pins of the Wenner array generating current flow inthe
concrete. The resultant potential di fference between the two innerTpins is measured. The current
used and resultant potential along with the affected sample area are used to calculate the resistivity

TS-3c TP 95-1 AASHTO

Copyright American Asanciation oStae Highway and Transpotaton Ofials 13 by the American Association of S ate Highway and Transportation Officials.
No reoroducbion or natworking pemited wwthout lceIe fron lHS All rights reserved. Duplication is aviolation of applicable law,
 of the concrete. The resistivity, in Kilohms-centimeters (k2-cm), has been found to be related to
the resistance of the specimen to chloride ion penetration.

4. SIGNIFICANCE AND USE

4.1. This test method covers the laboratory evaluation of the electrical resistivity of concrete samples
to provide a rapid indication of their resistance to chloride ion penetration. Wenner probe
measurements have shown good correlations with other clectrical indication tests such as the
T277 and the ASTM C 1202 tests. In most cases, the clectrical resistivity results have shown good
correlation with chloride exposure tests, such as ASTMC 1556, on companion cylinders cast from
the same concrete mixtures (see references in Sections 15.2, 15.4, and 15.5).

4.2. This test method is suitable for evaluation of materials and material proportions for design
purposes, as well as for rescarch and development.
4.3. The qualitative terms in the left-hand column of Table 1l should be used in most cases unless
otherwise noted by the specifying agency. The numerical results (resistivity, in kl-cm) from this
test method must be used with caution, especially in applications such as quality control and
acceptance testing.

Table 1-Chloride lon Penetration

Surface Resistivity Test
I00-mm x 200-mm (4-in. x &-in.) 150-mm x 300-mm (6-in, x 12-in.)
Chloride Lon Cylinder (kQ-cm) Cylinder (kl-cm)
Penetration a=15 a-1.5
High <12 <9.5
Moderate 12-21 9.5-16.5
Low 21-37 16.5-29
Very low 37-254 29-199
Negligible > 254 > 199
a=Wenner probe tip spacing8

4.4. The details of the test method apply to 100-mm (4-in.) and 150-mm (6-in.) nominal diameter
specimens. Other specimen diameters may be tested with appropriate changes to the Wenner probe
tip spacing and the correction factor in thc calculating equation. (See reference in Scction 15.3.)

TS-3c TP 95-2 AASHTO

Copyright American Associatin ol State Highway and Transportation Oticiats 13 by the American Association ofS ate Highway and Transportation Officials.
jino permited without license trom IHS All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law
 AC Current Applied
(I)

Potential
Measured

(V)

Surface
Concrete
Tested
to
be

Equipotential Lines Current Flow

Lines

Figure 1Four-Point Wenner Array Probe Test Setup

5. INTERFERENCES

5.1. This test method can produce misleading results when calcium nitrite has been admixed into a
concrete. The results from this test on concrete mixtures including calcium nitrite indicate lower
resistivity values, that is, lower resistance to chloride ion penetration, when compared to tests on
identical concrete mixtures (controls) without calcium nitrite. However, long-tem chloride
diffusion tests indicate the concretes with calcium nitrite were at least as resistant to chloride ion
penetration as the control mixtures.
Note 1Other admixtures might affect results of this test similarly. Long-term diffusion tests are
recommended if an admixture effect is suspected.
5.2. Sample curing condition is known to affcct the resistivity of the solution in the pore structure (see
Section 15.4). Limc-water curing on average reduces resistivity by 10 percent.
5.3. Because the test results are a function of the electrical resistance of the specimen, the presence of
reinforcing steel or other embedded electrically conductive materials may have a significant effect.
The test is not valid for samples containing reinforcing.
5.4. Sample age may have significant effects on the test results, depending on the type ofconcrete and
the curing procedure. Most concretes, if properly cured, become progressively and significantly
less permcable with time.

TS-3c TP 95-3 AASHTO

Copyvigh Anencan Association ol Siate Highway nd Tranuportalion Otlicats 13 by the American Association ofS ate Highway and Transportation Officials.
No roprndcton or nebworking pernitted wthout liconse trom IHS All ights reserved. Duplication is aviolation of applicable law.
 5.5 The degree of water saturation and concrete temperature may have a significant effect on the
electrical resistivity of concrete. A standardized conditioning procedure has been developed to
minimize this effect.

5.6. Factors that are known to affect resistivity as well as chloride ion penetration include
water/cement ratio, pozzolans, the presence of polymeric admixtures, air-void system, aggregate
type, and degree ofconsolidation.

6. APPARATUS

6.1. Surface Resistivity Apparatus-Apparatus neæds to be able to supply a flat-topped trapezoidal

wave at a frequency of about 13 Hz, and a pk-pk level with a nominal voltage limit of 25V pk-pk.
Use a Wenner probe capable of an adjustment of the probe tip spacing to 38.1 mm (1.5 in.).

Figure 2 Surface Resistivity Apparatus with 4-Pin Wenner Probe Aray

6.2. Specimen holder to prevent specimen rotation while under test. (See Figure 3 for example.)

TS-3c TP 95-4 AASHTO

Copyrigtt American Association oB State Hlghway and Transportabon Otficials 13 by the American Association ofS ate Highway and Transportation Officials.
obrkienparmilted wlthout licene from IHS All rights reserved. Duplication is aviolation of applicable law,
 Figure 3- Specimen Holder

7. REAGENTS AND MATERIALS

7.1. None required.

8. TEST SAMPLES

8.1. A set is composed of a minimum of three samples. Sample preparation and selection depends on
the purpose of the test. For evaluation of materials or their proportions, samples may be (a) cores
from structures or from larger diameter cast cylinders, (b) 100-mm (4-in.) diameter cast cylinders,
or (c) 150-mm (6-in.) diameter cast cylinders. Cylinders cast in the laboratory shall be prepared
following procedures in R 39. Unless specificd otherwise, moist-cure test samples for 28 days
prior to testing (Notes 2 and 3).
Note 2This test method may be used with various test durations and curing regimens to met
agency guidelines or specifications. Moist-cure in a 100 percent relative humidity moist room i
the preferred curing method. Curing by immersion in lime solution produces results that are
typically lower by a factor of 10 percent. Care should be excrcised when comparing results
obtaincd from specimens subjccted to differing conditions.
Note 3dccelerated Moist-Curing Provide7 days of moist-auring in accordance withR 39 for
specimens prepared in the laboratory or in accordance with the standard curing procedure ofT 23
for specimens prepared in the field. After 7 days of moist-curing, immerse the specimens for 21
days in lime-saturated water at 38.0 +2.0°C (100+3°F). The accelerated moist-curing procedure
has been found useful in providing an carlier indication of potential property development with
slower hydrating supplementary cementitious materials Because the two different curing methods
may not provide the same results, the specifier of the test may require a correlation between results
for extended moist-cured and accelerated moist-cured specimens and establish appropriate
acceptance criteria when the accelerated moist-curing procedure is used or permitted.

TS-3c TP 95-5 AASHTO

opynght Anerican Asaociation of Stte Hghway and Transpotaion Ofals 13 by the American Association ofS ate Highway and Transportation Officials.
All ights resererved. Duplication is aviolation of applicable l
No reproduction or networking penited veithout licanse trom iHS
 8.2. Transport the cores or field-cured cylinders to the laboratory in a moist condition in a scaled
watertight container. If samples must be shipped, they should be packed to be properly protected
from freezing and damage in transit or storage.
8.3 Immediately after removing the sample from the mold, make four indelible marks on the top
finished circular face marking the 0, 90, 180, and 270-degree points of the circumference.
Randomly assign one of the marks as 0 degrees, then counterclockwise assign the next mark as
90 degrees, and so on. Extend the marks onto the longitudinal sides of each sample. On the
longitudinal sides of the sample, mark the center of the sample to use as a visual reference during
testing. (See Figure 4 for example.)

Crcunferental Marks

Longitudinal
90 210 Center Marks
Top (Fhshed Face)

|180

Figure 4 Sample Marking

9. CONDITIONING

9.1. In order to saturate concrete cylinders with water, they must remain in a 100 percent relative
humidity condition (moist room) from the moment of mold removal to the moment of the test.

10. PROCEDURE

10.1. During the test, the air temperature around the specimens shall be maintained in the range of 20 to
25°C (68 to 77°F).
10.2. Remove the first sample from the moist room or water tank, blot off excess water, and transfer the
sample to the sample holder with the 0 mark on top. Do not leave the sample in the holder longer
than 5 min, as the concrete surface may start to dry.

10.3. Place the Wenner array probe on the longitudinal side of the sample, making sure the longitudinal
center mark is equidistant between the two inner probe pins. (See Figure 5.)

TS-3c TP 95-6 AASHTO

Otfiials 13 by the
Proiceci he l H S d t Higway and Transpartalon
Conwrioht Ameican Association of State Higtu

No reprodction or networkäng perrnitted without licanse form IHS All American Association ofS ate Highway and Transportation Officials.
s reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
 FLDOT

Figure 5 Wenner Array Placement

10.4. Record the measurement from the display unit after the reading becomes stablc. (See Table 2 in
Section 11.)

10.5. Rotate the sample from the 0 to the 90 degree mark, and repeat the steps in Sections 10.2 through
10.4.

10.6. Rotate the sample from the 90 to the 180 degree mark, and repeat the steps in Sections 10.2
through 10.4.
10.7. Rotate the sample from the 90 to the 270 degree mark, and repeat the steps in Sections 10.2
through 10.4.

10.8. Rotate the sample to the 0° mark and repeat the steps in Scctions 10.3 through 10.7 for the sample
in order to obtain a second set of readings at each degree mark. These will be used to obtain an
average of two readings at each location.
10.9. Repcat the steps in Sections 10.I to 10.8 for the other samples in the set.

TS-3c TP 95-7 AASHTO

Copyright American Asaociation ol State Higthwray and Transportation Olficiale l13 by the American Association ofS ate Highway and Transportation Officials.
Provided byy IHS under license with AASHTO
No reproduction or natworking pernitted without licenso trom IHS All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
 11. CALCULATION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS

Table 2 Sample Table for Recording the Surface Resistivity Readings

Surface Resistivity (SR) Readings, k-cm
Sample 0° 90° 1809 270 0 909 180 270° Average

A
B

Set average
Curing condition corection (x 1.| lime tank or L.0 for moist room)
Penetrability based on test

11.1. Calculate the average resistivity for each sample in the set.
11.2. Calculate the average resistivity of the set.
11.3. Ifthe samples were cured in a lime-water tank, multiply the set average by I.1. If the samples
were cured in a 100 percent relative humidity moist room, multiply the set average by 1.0.
11.4. Use Table 1, with the appropriate cylinder size, to evaluate the chloride penetration resistance
based on the resistivity. These values were developed from data on various types of concretes.

12 REPORT
12.1. Report the following. ifkonown:
12.1.1. Source of coreor cylinder, in terms of the particular location the core or cylinder represents;
12.1.2. Identification number of core or cylinder:

12.1.3. Type of concrete, including binder type, water/cement ratio, and other relevant data supplicd with
samples;
12.1.4. Description of specimen, including presence and location of reinforcing steel;
12.1.5. Curing history of specimen;
12.1.6. Test results, reported as the surface resistivity measured; and
12.1.7. The qualitative chloride ion penetrability cquivalent to the surface resistivity measured (from
Table l).

13. PRECISION AND BIAS'

13.1. Precision:

13.1.1. Single-Operator Precision The single operator coefficient of variation of a single test result has
been found to be 6.3 percent (Note 4). Therefore, the results of two propety conducted tests by the
same operator on concrete samples from the same batch and of the same diameter should not differ
by more than 21 percent (Note 4).

TS-3c TP 95-8 AASHTO

Copyrigit American Association ol State
PrOvKed by lHS under licarnse with AASHTOHigjrway and Trarnsportation OficGals 13 by the American Association ofS ate Highway and Transportation Officials.
No reproducton o Workng pernitted hat cernse ftram lHS All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
 13.1.2. Multilaboratory Precision The mulilaboratory coefficient of variation of a single test result has
been found to be 12.5 percent (Note 4). Therefore results of two properly conducted tests in
different laboratories on the same material should not differ by more than 35.2 percent (Note 4).
Note 4 These numbrs represent, repectively, the (1s percent) and (d2s percent) limits as
described in ASTM C 670. The precision statements are based on the variations in tests on three
different concretes, cach tested in triplicate in I1 laboratories. All specimens had the same actual
diameters, but lengths varied within the range 50 ±3 mm (2+0.125 in.).

The percentage cited represents the (d2s percent) limit based on the value for the multilaboratory
coefficient of variation.

13.2. Bias-The procedure of this test method for measuring the resistance of concrete to chloride ion
penetration has no bias because the value of this resistance can be defined only in terms of a
test method.

14. KEYWORDS

14.1. Chloride content; corrosion; deicing chemicals; resistance-chloride penetration.

15. REFERENCES

15.1. Chini, A. R., L. C. Muszynski, J. Hicks. Determination of Acceptance Permeability

Characteristics for Performance-Rdated Specifications for Portland Cement Concrete. Final
Report (Contract No. BC 354-41) submitted to Florida Department ofTransportation, Tallahassee,
FL, July 2003.
15.2. Hamilton, H. R., A. J. Boyd, E. A. Vivas. Permeabiliy of Concrete- Comparison of Conductive
and Diffusion Methods. Final Report (Contract No. BD 536) submitted to Florida Department of
Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, June 2007.

15.3. Morris, W., E. I. Moreno, and A. A. Sagüés. Practical Evaluation of Resistivity of Concrete in
Test Cylinders Using aWenner Array Probe. Cement andConcrete Research, Vol. 26, No. 12,
1996. ScienceDirect, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,December 1996, pp. 1779-1787.
15.4. Kessler, R. J., R. G. Powers, and M. A. Paredes. Resistivity Measurements of Water Saturated
Concrete as an Indicator of Permeability, Paper 05261. Corrosion 2005, conference held in
Houston, TX, sponsored by NACE International, April 3-7, 2005.

15.5. Kessler, R. J., R. G. Powers, E. A. Vivas, M. A. Paredes, and Y. P. Vimani. "Surface Resistivity
as an Indicator of Concrete Chloride Penetration Resistance." 2008 Concrete Bridge Conference.

Supporting data have been filed at ASTM headquarters (100 Barr Harbor Drive, Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959)
and may be obtained by requesting Research Report C-9-1004.

TS-3c TP 95-9 AASHTO

AnanABoGtion
AASHTO ighway and Transportation Olicials 13 by the American Association ofS ate Highway and Transportation Officials.
No reproducbion or networking pernited without licanse rom lHS All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.