Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd
Upload
17 views

Lecture 4 Formulation of Hypothesis

Uploaded by

Anwar shah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
17 views

Lecture 4 Formulation of Hypothesis

Uploaded by

Anwar shah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

FORMULATION OF HYPOTHESIS

AND TESTING
LECTURE 4

Department of Psychology
AWKUM
DEFINITION OF HYPOTHESIS
 The word hypothesis consists of two words –
Hypo+Thesis. „Hypo‟ means tentative or subject to the
verification. „Thesis‟ means statement about solution
of the problem.
 Thus the literal meaning of the term hypothesis
is a tentative statement about the solution of the
problem.
 Hypothesis offers a solution of the problem that is to
be verified empirically and based on some rationale.
 Again, ‟hypo‟ means the composition of two or more
variables which are to be verified and „thesis‟ means
position of these variables in the specific frame of
reference.
NATURE OF HYPOTHESIS
 (i) Conceptual: Some kind of conceptual elements in
the framework are involved in a hypothesis.
 (ii) Verbal statement in a declarative form: It is
a verbal expression of ideas and concepts. It is not
merely mental idea but in the verbal form, the idea is
ready enough for empirical verification.
 (iii) It represents the tentative relationship
between two or more variables.
 (iv) Forward or future oriented: A hypothesis is
future-oriented. It relates to the future verification
not the past facts and information.
 (v) Pivot of a scientific research: All research
activities are designed for verification of hypothesis.
FUNCTIONS OF HYPOTHESIS:
 (i) It is a temporary solution of a problem
concerning with some truth which enables an
investigator to start his research works.

 (ii) It offers a basis in establishing the specifics


what to study for and may provide possible
solutions to the problem.

 (iii) It may lead to formulate another hypothesis.

 (iv) A preliminary hypothesis may take the shape


of final hypothesis.
 (v) Each hypothesis provides the investigator with
definite statement which may be objectively tested
and accepted or rejected and leads for interpreting
results and drawing conclusions that is related to
original purpose.

 (vi) It delimits field of the investigation.

 (vii) It sensitizes the researcher so that he should


work selectively, and have very realistic approach to
the problem.

 (viii) It offers the simple means for collecting


evidences for verification.
IMPORTANCE OF A HYPOTHESIS:

 (i) Investigator’s eyes: Carter V. Good thinks that


by guiding the investigator in further investigation
hypothesis serves as the investigator‟s eyes in seeking
answers to tentatively adopted generalization.
 (ii) Focuses research: Without hypothesis, a
research is unfocussed research and remains like a
random empirical wandering. Hypothesis serves as
necessary link between theory and the
investigation.
 (iii) Clear and specific goals: A well thought out set
of hypothesis places clear and specific goals before the
research worker and provides him with a basis for
selecting sample and research procedure to meet
these goals.
 (iv) Links together: According to Barr and
Scates, “It serves the important function of
linking together related facts and information
and organizing them into wholes.”

 (v) Prevents blind research: In the words of


P.V. Young, ”The use of hypothesis prevents a
blind search and indiscriminate gathering of
masses of data which may later prove irrelevant
to the problem under study.“

 (vi) Guiding Light: ”A hypothesis serves as


powerful beacon that lights the way for the
research work.”
FORMS OF HYPOTHESIS:
 (i) Question form:
A hypothesis stated as a question represents the
simplest level of empirical observation. It fails to fit
most definitions of hypothesis. It frequently appears
in the list. There are cases of simple investigation
which can be adequately implemented by raising a
question, rather than dividing the hypothesis into
forms into acceptable / rejectable categories.

 (ii) Declarative Statement :


A hypothesis developed as a declarative statement
provides an anticipated relationship or difference
between variables. Such a hypothesis developer has
examined existing evidence which led him to believe
that a difference may be anticipated as additional
evidence. It is merely a declaration of the
independent variables effect on the
criterion variable.
 (iii) Directional Hypothesis :

 A directional hypothesis denotes an expected


direction in the relationship or difference between
variables. This type of hypothesis developer appears
more certain of anticipated evidence. If seeking a
capable hypothesis is the general interest of the
researcher, this hypothesis is less safe than the others
because it reveals two possible conditions. First that
the problem of seeking relationship between variables
is so obvious that additional evidence is scarcely
needed. Secondly, researcher has examined the
variables very thoroughly and the available evidence
supports the statement of a particular anticipated
outcome.
 (iv) Non –Directional Hypothesis or Null
Hypothesis:

 This hypothesis is stated in the null form which


is an assertion that no relationship or no
difference exists between or among the variables.
Null hypothesis is a statistical hypothesis
testable within the framework of probability
theory. It is a non-directional form of hypothesis.
 There is a trend to employ or develop null
hypothesis in research in most of the disciplines.
A null hypothesis tentatively states that on the
basis of evidence tested there is no difference.
 Statistical tests of significance are used to accept
and reject the null hypothesis. If it is rejected,
the general hypothesis is accepted.
FORMULATION OF TESTABLE
HYPOTHESIS:
 A poorly chosen or poorly worded hypothesis can
prevent the following:

 (i) The obtaining of enough pertinent data,

 (ii) The drawing of conclusions and


generalizations

 (iii) The application of certain statistical


measures in the analysis of the result.
DIFFICULTIES IN THE FORMULATION OF
USEFUL HYPOTHESIS:
 1. Absence of knowledge of a clear theoretical
framework.

2. Lack of ability to make use of the theoretical


framework logically.

3. Lack of acquaintance with available research


technique resulting in failure to be able to phrase
the hypothesis properly.
STEPS FOR HYPOTHESIS TESTING
 Step 1: State the hypotheses
Be sure to state both the null and alternative
hypotheses .

Step 2: Select a level of significance (1%, 5% or 10%)

Step 3: Calculate the test value

Step 4: Calculate the probability value

Step 5: Make a decision

Step 6: Summarize results

You might also like