The document outlines strategies for writing the introductory section of a thesis, including starting with a quotation, presenting statistics, or stating the researcher's rationale. It emphasizes the importance of clearly defining the problem, the significance of the study, and the theoretical framework. Additionally, it details the structure of the introduction, including background, scope, and definitions of key terms.
The document outlines strategies for writing the introductory section of a thesis, including starting with a quotation, presenting statistics, or stating the researcher's rationale. It emphasizes the importance of clearly defining the problem, the significance of the study, and the theoretical framework. Additionally, it details the structure of the introduction, including background, scope, and definitions of key terms.
faced by a thesis writer is how to start the introductory section. To help ease the problem, the following approaches are suggested. 1. Start with a brief but provocative quotation that us applicable to the theme of the study. 2. Commence with striking facts or statistics that objectively portray the existing problem situation. 3. Begin by presenting a very brief background or resume of events that truly depict the present state of the issue abroad, in the country and in the locality. 4. Begin with the researcher’s firm stand in the need to bridge the gap between existing bodies of knowledge and the prevailing problem situation. 5. Start with the researcher’s rationale concerning the need to replicate completed study 6. If a new theory is being envisioned for the study, commence by attacking some pertinent universally-held theories of psychologists, social scientists, or experts in the subject and giving the rationale behind the research undertaking. 1. Presentation of the problem. 2. The existence of an unsatisfactory condition, a felt problem that needs a solution. 3. Rationale of the study. 4. Historical background of the problem. 5. A desire to have a deeper and clearer understanding of a situation, circumstance or phenomenon. 6. A desire to find a better way of doing something or of improving a product. 7. A desire to discover something. 8. Geographical conditions of the study locale. 9. A link between the introduction and the statement of the problem. There should be a general problem and followed by the specific problems into which the general problem is broken up. This section discusses the importance of the study to society, the country, the government, the community, the institution, the agency concerned, and the thesis writer himself. It expounds on the study’s probable impact to education, science, technology, on-going researches, etc. It also gives the justification for the study in terms of its contribution to theory and practice. Lastly, it touches on the significance of the study to the researcher himself, what it does to his profession, and the difference it makes to his own professional growth. The rationale, timeliness and/or relevance of the study. Possible solutions to existing problems or improvement to unsatisfactory conditions. Who are to be benefited and how they are going to be benefited. Possible contribution to the fund of knowledge. Possible implications Explained in this section is the nature, coverage, and time frame of the study. It presents in brief the subject areas of investigation, the number of respondents or subjects involved, the place, the time period or school year covered, and the rationale behind delimiting the scope of the study. A brief statement of the general purpose of the study. The subject matter and topics studied and discussed. The locale of the study, where the data were gathered or the entity to which the data belong. The population or universe from which the respondents were selected. The period of the study. A theoretical framework is a conceptual model that: • Defines key concepts, variables, and their relationships within a study. • Serves as a roadmap for developing arguments in research. • Outlines relationships between variables, assumptions, and theories. • Compiles research findings to explain connected concepts. From the review of related literature and studies, the researcher may formulate a theoretical scheme for his research problem. This scheme is tentative explanation or theoretical explanation of the phenomenon or problem and serves as the basis for the formulation of research hypotheses. The conceptual framework consists of the investigator’s own position on a problem after his exposure to various theories that have bearing on the problem. Aparadigm is a diagrammatic representation of a conceptual framework. It depicts in a more vivid way what the conceptual framework wants to convey. INPUT – PROCESS - OUTPUT Under this main topical component are the operational and conceptual definitions of the terms that are found in the title of the study, including other unusual and technical terms. 1.1. Background of the Study 1.2 Significance of the Study 1.3 Statement of the Problem 1.4 Scope and Limitations 1.5 Theoretical Framework 1.6 Conceptual Framework 1.7 Definition of Terms