-
The Straw Tracking Detector for the Fermilab Muon $g-2$ Experiment
Authors:
B. T. King,
T. Albahri,
S. Al-Kilani,
D. Allspach,
D. Beckner,
A. Behnke,
T. J. V. Bowcock,
D. Boyden,
R. M. Carey,
J. Carroll,
B. C. K. Casey,
S. Charity,
R. Chislett,
M. Eads,
A. Epps,
S. B. Foster,
D. Gastler,
S. Grant,
T. Halewood-Leagas,
K. Hardin,
E. Hazen,
G. Hesketh,
D. J. Hollywood,
T. Jones,
C. Kenziora
, et al. (32 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Muon $g-2$ Experiment at Fermilab uses a gaseous straw tracking detector to make detailed measurements of the stored muon beam profile, which are essential for the experiment to achieve its uncertainty goals. Positrons from muon decays spiral inward and pass through the tracking detector before striking an electromagnetic calorimeter. The tracking detector is therefore located inside the vacuu…
▽ More
The Muon $g-2$ Experiment at Fermilab uses a gaseous straw tracking detector to make detailed measurements of the stored muon beam profile, which are essential for the experiment to achieve its uncertainty goals. Positrons from muon decays spiral inward and pass through the tracking detector before striking an electromagnetic calorimeter. The tracking detector is therefore located inside the vacuum chamber in a region where the magnetic field is large and non-uniform. As such, the tracking detector must have a low leak rate to maintain a high-quality vacuum, must be non-magnetic so as not to perturb the magnetic field and, to minimize energy loss, must have a low radiation length. The performance of the tracking detector has met or surpassed the design requirements, with adequate electronic noise levels, an average straw hit resolution of $(110 \pm 20) \,μ$m, a detection efficiency of 97% or higher, and no performance degradation or signs of aging. The tracking detector's measurements result in an otherwise unachievable understanding of the muon's beam motion, particularly at early times in the experiment's measurement period when there are a significantly greater number of muons decaying. This is vital to the statistical power of the experiment, as well as facilitating the precise extraction of several systematic corrections and uncertainties. This paper describes the design, construction, testing, commissioning, and performance of the tracking detector.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2022; v1 submitted 3 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
The fast non-ferric kicker system for the Muon $g-2$ Experiment at Fermilab
Authors:
A. P. Schreckenberger,
D. Allspach,
D. Barak,
J. Bohn,
C. Bradford,
D. Cauz,
S. P. Chang,
A. Chapelain,
S. Chappa,
S. Charity,
R. Chislett,
J. Esquivel,
C. Ferrari,
A. Fioretti,
C. Gabbanini,
M. D. Galati,
L. Gibbons,
J. L. Holzbauer,
M. Incagli,
C. Jensen,
J. Kaspar,
D. Kawall,
A. Keshavarzi,
D. S. Kessler,
B. Kiburg
, et al. (17 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We describe the installation, commissioning, and characterization of the new injection kicker system in the Muon $g-2$ Experiment (E989) at Fermilab, which makes a precision measurement of the muon magnetic anomaly. Three Blumlein pulsers drive each of the 1.27-m-long non-ferric kicker magnets, which reside in a storage ring vacuum (SRV) that is subjected to a 1.45 T magnetic field. The new system…
▽ More
We describe the installation, commissioning, and characterization of the new injection kicker system in the Muon $g-2$ Experiment (E989) at Fermilab, which makes a precision measurement of the muon magnetic anomaly. Three Blumlein pulsers drive each of the 1.27-m-long non-ferric kicker magnets, which reside in a storage ring vacuum (SRV) that is subjected to a 1.45 T magnetic field. The new system has been redesigned relative to Muon $g-2$'s predecessor experiment, and we present those details in this manuscript.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2021; v1 submitted 15 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Beam dynamics corrections to the Run-1 measurement of the muon anomalous magnetic moment at Fermilab
Authors:
T. Albahri,
A. Anastasi,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey,
D. Cauz,
R. Chakraborty,
S. P. Chang,
A. Chapelain,
S. Charity,
R. Chislett
, et al. (152 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper presents the beam dynamics systematic corrections and their uncertainties for the Run-1 data set of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment. Two corrections to the measured muon precession frequency $ω_a^m$ are associated with well-known effects owing to the use of electrostatic quadrupole (ESQ) vertical focusing in the storage ring. An average vertically oriented motional magnetic field is fe…
▽ More
This paper presents the beam dynamics systematic corrections and their uncertainties for the Run-1 data set of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment. Two corrections to the measured muon precession frequency $ω_a^m$ are associated with well-known effects owing to the use of electrostatic quadrupole (ESQ) vertical focusing in the storage ring. An average vertically oriented motional magnetic field is felt by relativistic muons passing transversely through the radial electric field components created by the ESQ system. The correction depends on the stored momentum distribution and the tunes of the ring, which has relatively weak vertical focusing. Vertical betatron motions imply that the muons do not orbit the ring in a plane exactly orthogonal to the vertical magnetic field direction. A correction is necessary to account for an average pitch angle associated with their trajectories. A third small correction is necessary because muons that escape the ring during the storage time are slightly biased in initial spin phase compared to the parent distribution. Finally, because two high-voltage resistors in the ESQ network had longer than designed RC time constants, the vertical and horizontal centroids and envelopes of the stored muon beam drifted slightly, but coherently, during each storage ring fill. This led to the discovery of an important phase-acceptance relationship that requires a correction. The sum of the corrections to $ω_a^m$ is 0.50 $\pm$ 0.09 ppm; the uncertainty is small compared to the 0.43 ppm statistical precision of $ω_a^m$.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2021; v1 submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Search for a muon EDM using the frozen-spin technique
Authors:
A. Adelmann,
M. Backhaus,
C. Chavez Barajas,
N. Berger,
T. Bowcock,
C. Calzolaio,
G. Cavoto,
R. Chislett,
A. Crivellin,
M. Daum,
M. Fertl,
M. Giovannozzi,
G. Hesketh,
M. Hildebrandt,
I. Keshelashvili,
A. Keshavarzi,
K. S. Khaw,
K. Kirch,
A. Kozlinskiy,
A. Knecht,
M. Lancaster,
B. Märkisch,
F. Meier Aeschbacher,
F. Méot,
A. Nass
, et al. (13 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This letter of intent proposes an experiment to search for an electric dipole moment of the muon based on the frozen-spin technique. We intend to exploit the high electric field, $E=1{\rm GV/m}$, experienced in the rest frame of the muon with a momentum of $p=125 {\rm MeV/}c$ when passing through a large magnetic field of $|\vec{B}|=3{\rm T}$. Current muon fluxes at the $μ$E1 beam line permit an i…
▽ More
This letter of intent proposes an experiment to search for an electric dipole moment of the muon based on the frozen-spin technique. We intend to exploit the high electric field, $E=1{\rm GV/m}$, experienced in the rest frame of the muon with a momentum of $p=125 {\rm MeV/}c$ when passing through a large magnetic field of $|\vec{B}|=3{\rm T}$. Current muon fluxes at the $μ$E1 beam line permit an improved search with a sensitivity of $σ(d_μ)\leq 6\times10^{-23}e{\rm cm}$, about three orders of magnitude more sensitivity than for the current upper limit of $|d_μ|\leq1.8\times10^{-19}e{\rm cm}$\,(C.L. 95\%). With the advent of the new high intensity muon beam, HIMB, and the cold muon source, muCool, at PSI the sensitivity of the search could be further improved by tailoring a re-acceleration scheme to match the experiments injection phase space. While a null result would set a significantly improved upper limit on an otherwise un-constrained Wilson coefficient, the discovery of a muon EDM would corroborate the existence of physics beyond the Standard Model.
△ Less
Submitted 17 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Muon (g-2) Technical Design Report
Authors:
J. Grange,
V. Guarino,
P. Winter,
K. Wood,
H. Zhao,
R. M. Carey,
D. Gastler,
E. Hazen,
N. Kinnaird,
J. P. Miller,
J. Mott,
B. L. Roberts,
J. Benante,
J. Crnkovic,
W. M. Morse,
H. Sayed,
V. Tishchenko,
V. P. Druzhinin,
B. I. Khazin,
I. A. Koop,
I. Logashenko,
Y. M. Shatunov,
E. Solodov,
M. Korostelev,
D. Newton
, et al. (176 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Muon (g-2) Experiment, E989 at Fermilab, will measure the muon anomalous magnetic moment a factor-of-four more precisely than was done in E821 at the Brookhaven National Laboratory AGS. The E821 result appears to be greater than the Standard-Model prediction by more than three standard deviations. When combined with expected improvement in the Standard-Model hadronic contributions, E989 should…
▽ More
The Muon (g-2) Experiment, E989 at Fermilab, will measure the muon anomalous magnetic moment a factor-of-four more precisely than was done in E821 at the Brookhaven National Laboratory AGS. The E821 result appears to be greater than the Standard-Model prediction by more than three standard deviations. When combined with expected improvement in the Standard-Model hadronic contributions, E989 should be able to determine definitively whether or not the E821 result is evidence for physics beyond the Standard Model. After a review of the physics motivation and the basic technique, which will use the muon storage ring built at BNL and now relocated to Fermilab, the design of the new experiment is presented. This document was created in partial fulfillment of the requirements necessary to obtain DOE CD-2/3 approval.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2018; v1 submitted 27 January, 2015;
originally announced January 2015.
