Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2807565.2807707acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgenderitConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Culturally Responsive Making with American Indian Girls: Bridging the Identity Gap in Crafting and Computing with Electronic Textiles

Published: 24 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

The Maker Movement has been successful in refocusing attention on the value of hand work, but heritage craft practices remain noticeably absent. We argue that combining heritage craft practices, like those found in many American Indian communities throughout the United States, with maker practices presents an opportunity to examine a rich, if contentious space, where different cultural systems come together. Further, we argue that the combination of heritage crafts, maker practices, and computing provides an opportunity to address the "identity gap" experienced by many girls and individuals from non-dominant communities, who struggle with taking on the identity of a "scientist." In this paper, we focus on the experiences of twenty-six American Indian girls (12--14 years-old) who participated in a three week, culturally responsive e-textiles unit as part of their Native Studies class at a tribally-controlled charter school located just outside of Phoenix, Arizona. In order to understand if the combination of a tangible design element with computing and cultural knowledge would be a promising activity for attracting American Indian girls to computing, our analysis focused on students' initial engagement with e-textiles materials and activities, their agency in designing and making e-textiles artifacts, and the ways in which e-textile artifacts fostered connections across home and school spaces.

References

[1]
Akkerman, S.F. & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132--169.
[2]
Brayboy, B.M.J. & Maughan, E. (2009). Indigenous knowledges and the story of the bean. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), 1--21.
[3]
Buechley, L. (2013, October). Thinking about making. Keynote address at FabLearn conference. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
[4]
Buechley, L. & Hill, B. (2010). LilyPad in the Wild: How hardware's long tail issupporting new engineering and design communities. Proceedings of Designing Interactive systems (DIS) (pp. 199--207). Aarhus: Denmark: ACM.
[5]
Buechley, L. & Eisenberg, M. (2008). The LilyPad Arduino: Toward wearable engineering for everyone. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(2), 12--15.
[6]
Buechley, L., Peppler, K., Eisenberg, M. & Kafai, Y. (Eds.) (2013). Textile messages: Dispatches from the world of e-textiles and education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
[7]
Charmaz, C. (2000). Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509--535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[8]
Denner, J., Werner, L., & Ortiz, S. (2012). Computer games created by middle school girls: Can they be used to measure understanding of computer science concepts? Computers & Education, 58(1), 240--249.
[9]
Dewhurst, M., Keawe, L., MacDowell, M., Okada-Carlson, C.N.K., & Wong, A.K. (2013). Kaulana'ana i ka piko (In weaving you begin at the center): Perspectives from a culturally specific approach to arts education. Harvard Educational Review, 83(1), 136--146.
[10]
DiSalvo, B. & Bruckman, A. (2011). From interests to values: Computer science is not that difficult but wanting to learn it is. Communications of the ACM 54, 8, 27--29.
[11]
DiSalvo, B., Guzdial, M., Bruckman, A., & McKlin, T. (2014). Saving face while geeking out: Video game testing as a justification for learning computer science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(3), 272--315.
[12]
Eglash, R. (2007). Ethnocomputing with Native American Design. In L.E. Dyson, M. Hendriks, & S. Grant (Eds.), Information Technology and Indigenous People (pp. 210--219). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
[13]
Eglash, R. & Bennett, A. (2009). Teaching with hidden capital: Agency in children's explorations of cornrow hairstyles. Children, Youth, and Environments, 19(1), 58--73.
[14]
Eglash, R., Gilbert, J., & Foster, E. Broadening participation: Toward culturally responsive computing education. Communications of the ACM, 56(7), 33--36.
[15]
Eglash, R., Gilbert, J., Taylor, V., & Geier, S.R. (2013). Culturally responsive computing in two urban, after-school contexts: Two approaches. Urban Education, 48(5), 629--656.
[16]
Fields, D. & Enyedy, N. (2013). Picking up the mantle of "expert": Assigned roles, assertion of identity, and peer recognition within a programming class. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 20(2), 113--131.
[17]
Fields, D.A., Kafai, Y.B., & Searle, K.A. (2012). Functional aesthetics for learning: Creative tensions in youth e-textile designs. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 196--203).
[18]
Hill, S.H. (1997). Weaving new worlds: Southeastern Cherokee women and their basketry. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
[19]
Honey, M., & Kanter, D. E. (Eds.). (2013). Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of stem innovators. New York, NY: Routledge.
[20]
Kafai, Y.B. (1995). Minds in Play. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
[21]
Kafai, Y.B., Lee, E., Searle, K., Fields, D., Kaplan, E., & Lui, D. (2014). A crafts-oriented approach to computing in high school: Introducing computational concepts, practices, and perspectives with electronic textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1).
[22]
Kafai, Y.B., Searle, K.A., Martinez, C., & Brayboy, B. (2014). Ethnocomputing with Electronic Textiles: Culturally Responsive Open Design to Broaden Participation in Computing in American Indian Youth and Communities. SIGCSE '14: Proceedings of the 45th SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 241--246). Atlanta, GA: Association of Computing Machinery.
[23]
Kelleher, C. (2008). Using storytelling to introduce girls to computer programming. In Y.B. Kafai, C. Heeter, J. Denner, & J.Y. Sun (Eds.), Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New perspectives on gender and gaming (pp. 247--264). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[24]
Klug & Whitfield. (2003). Widening the circle: Culturally relevant pedagogy for American Indian children. New York, NY: Routledge.
[25]
Lameman, B.A., Lewis, J.E., & Fragnito, S. (2010). Skins 1.0: A curriculum for designing games with First Nations youth. In Proceedings of FuturePlay 2010 (pp. 105--112). Vancouver BC: ACM.
[26]
Lomawaima, K.T. & McCarty, T.L. (2006). To remain an Indian: Lessons in democracy from a century of Native American education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
[27]
Margolis, J. & Fisher, A. (2001). Unlocking the clubhouse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[28]
Margolis, J., Ryoo, J.J., Sandoval, C.D.M., Lee, C., Goode, J., & Chapman, G. (2012). Beyond access: Broadening participation in high school computer science. ACM Inroads, 3(4), 72--78.
[29]
Millner, A. & Baafi, E. (2011). Modkit: Blending and extending approachable platforms for creating computer programs and interactive objects. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '11) (pp. 250--253). ACM: Ann Arbor, MI.
[30]
Nasir, N.S. & Saxe, G.B. (2003). Ethnic and academic identities: A cultural practices perspective on emerging tensions and their management in the lives of minority students. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 14--18.
[31]
National Science Foundation (2014). Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. Retrieved on February 19, 2015 from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/content/etc/nsb1401.pdf.
[32]
Searle, K.A., Fields, D.A., & Kafai, Y.B. (in press). Is "Sewing a Girl's Sport"? Addressing gender issues in the Maker culture. In K. Peppler, E. Halverson & Y. Kafai (Eds)., Makeology. New York, NY: Routledge.
[33]
Star, S.L. & Griessemer, J.R. (1989). Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907--39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387--420.
[34]
Tan, E., Calabrese-Barton, A., Kang, H., & O'Neill, T. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1143--1179.
[35]
Varma, R. & Galindo-Sanchez, V. (2006). Native American women in computing. In, E.M. Trauth (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gender and information technology (pp. 914--919). IGI Global: Hershey, PA. Bowman, M., Debray, S. K., and Peterson, L. L. 1993. Reasoning about naming systems. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 15, 5 (Nov. 1993), 795--825. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/161468.16147.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Girls’ Reluctance and Intersectional Identities in STEM-Rich MakerspacesEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1406062814:6(628)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Appalachian Ingenuity and the Need for Rurally Sustaining Computational Thinking PathwaysProceedings of the 2024 on RESPECT Annual Conference10.1145/3653666.3656073(133-138)Online publication date: 16-May-2024
  • (2024)Broadening Computing Participation in the Navajo NationProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653551(695-700)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Culturally Responsive Making with American Indian Girls: Bridging the Identity Gap in Crafting and Computing with Electronic Textiles

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      GenderIT '15: Proceedings of the Third Conference on GenderIT
      April 2015
      68 pages
      ISBN:9781450335966
      DOI:10.1145/2807565
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      In-Cooperation

      • University of Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 24 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Electronic textiles
      2. Indigenous Communities
      3. K-12
      4. education

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      GenderIT '15
      GenderIT '15: The Third Conference on GenderIT
      April 24, 2015
      PA, Philadelphia, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 39 of 55 submissions, 71%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)29
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 03 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Girls’ Reluctance and Intersectional Identities in STEM-Rich MakerspacesEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1406062814:6(628)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Appalachian Ingenuity and the Need for Rurally Sustaining Computational Thinking PathwaysProceedings of the 2024 on RESPECT Annual Conference10.1145/3653666.3656073(133-138)Online publication date: 16-May-2024
      • (2024)Broadening Computing Participation in the Navajo NationProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653551(695-700)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
      • (2024)Ode to Barelas: Supporting Youth Agency Cultural Expression, and Community Engagement Through an Interactive MuralProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660752(2183-2197)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
      • (2024)Cultural-Centric Computational EmbroideryProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630818(673-679)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
      • (2024)DanceBits 'It tells you to see us': Supporting Dance Practices with an Educational Computing KitProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3633350(1-19)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
      • (2024)Interactive Murals: New Opportunities for Collaborative STEAM LearningProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641987(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)Towards inclusivity in AI: A comparative study of cognitive engagement between marginalized female students and peersBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.13467Online publication date: 23-Apr-2024
      • (2024)An unplugged remix of culturally responsive computing for early childhood educationFuture in Educational Research10.1002/fer3.41Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
      • (2023)Culturally Responsive Computing in teacher training: Designing towards the transformative learning of girls in STEMInternational Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools10.21585/ijcses.v6i2.1796:2Online publication date: 19-Oct-2023
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media