- I'm is researcher in The Indonesian Commission on Human Rights and focus at criminal law (reform law, terorisme, and ... moreI'm is researcher in The Indonesian Commission on Human Rights and focus at criminal law (reform law, terorisme, and security reform), human rights law (agrarian, bussines and human rights) and consitutional law (legal drafting, election)edit
The earthquake and liquefaction in 2018 in Palu City, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, caused thousands of casualties and property. This incident reminds us that we have forgotten the local wisdom of the Kaili Tribe, who have lived for... more
The earthquake and liquefaction in 2018 in Palu City, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, caused thousands of casualties and property. This incident reminds us that we have forgotten the local wisdom of the Kaili Tribe, who have lived for hundreds of years in disaster-prone areas with Toponym and Kayori. We use qualitative methods with interviews and questionnaires, observation, and literature studies. One hundred Kaili people in Palu City are respondents in interviews and questionnaires, using purposive sampling taken at random. Apart from that, for supporting data, the team obtained from journals, books, and laws and regulations. The first sub-section of the book chapter discusses the existence of the Kaili Tribe in Palu City, and the second sub-chapter explores community wisdom in the form of Kayori, Toponym, and traditional houses. Discussion of the third sub-chapter is regarding recognizing the Kaili Tribe in disaster management legislation and policies. This study concludes that the Kaili people have cultural values that are adaptive to natural disasters through Kayori (oral poetry), toponymy (regional naming based on historical records), and earthquake-resistant traditional houses on stilts. In formal recognition, cultural heritage has been regulated in regional regulations related to conventional institutions. Still, it has not been comprehensively adopted as a roadmap for policy or program-making in disaster mitigation. Keywords Toponym · Kayori · Disaster mitigation · Recognition · To Kaili local wisdom
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Pengaduan masyarakat ke Komnas HAM RI dari waktu ke waktu terus mengalami peningkatan, baik dalam aspek kuantitas dan kualitas. Jika sebelumnya aktor non – negara dalam hal ini korporasi tidak terlalu menonjol, justru dalam 5... more
Pengaduan masyarakat ke Komnas HAM RI dari waktu ke waktu terus mengalami peningkatan, baik dalam aspek kuantitas dan kualitas. Jika sebelumnya aktor non – negara dalam hal ini korporasi tidak terlalu menonjol, justru dalam 5 (lima) tahun terakhir pengaduan terhadap dugaan pelanggaran HAM oleh sektor ini memiliki tren yang meningkat, baik dalam industri pertambangan, perkebunan, kehutanan, minyak dan gas. Dengan semakin menguatnya peran korporasi dan di sisi lain negara semakin sulit melakukan kontrol terhadap entitas ini, maka pendekatan HAM untuk memastikan perlindungan dan pemulihan terhadap masyarakat, khususnya yang terdampak menjadi relevan – tidak sekedar menuntut penghormatan korporasi terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan semata.
Research Interests:
President Joko Widodo on November 2, 2020 signed Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, which is known to the public as the omnibus law. The omnibus law is a simplification mechanism for 79 (seventy nine) laws aimed at encouraging... more
President Joko Widodo on November 2, 2020 signed Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, which is known to the public as the omnibus law. The omnibus law is a simplification mechanism for 79 (seventy nine) laws aimed at encouraging investment and job creation. Various aspirations and objections from the public, in terms of substance and formality were not taken seriously by the government and parliament, instead there were arrests, detentions and suggested a judicial review at the Constitutional Court. The presence of the omnibus law will increase regulatory obesity because it imposes a delegation of 450 (four hundred and fifty) arrangements and further emphasizes the dominance of executive power. The research method used is qualitative with descriptive presentation. Primary legal materials are collected through inquiries from members of parliament and academics/experts, while secondary legal materials are based on reports, journals, books and regulations. This research conclude...
Research Interests:
The judicial system in Indonesia is dynamic and adaptive to the development of science and law, not least within the scope of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, one of which relates to the amicus curiae (friends of the... more
The judicial system in Indonesia is dynamic and adaptive to the development of science and law, not least within the scope of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, one of which relates to the amicus curiae (friends of the judiciary). In practice, amicus curiae are generally presented in cases or trials that get public attention and the livelihoods of many people, such as the environment, land, labor, and so on. Nevertheless, there is no regulation or Supreme Court Regulation on the application of amicus curiae in the trial, but various practices have occurred within the court. This paper will discuss: (a) how the concept of amicus curiae is in the justice system in several countries, (b) the practice and application of amicus curiae in the judiciary in Indonesia, and (c) the opportunity for the Supreme Court to issue regulations or circulars that seek to regulate the implementation of the amicus curiae as part of legal developments in Indonesia. This writing uses a qualita...
Research Interests:
This research aims to find an ethical relationship between corruption, corruption eradication and human rights in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. This research uses a qualitative approach. Data was collected through... more
This research aims to find an ethical relationship between corruption, corruption eradication and human rights in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. This research uses a qualitative approach. Data was collected through literature study and interviews. The findings of the research indicate that, corruption affects the fulfillment of basic needs of the community, in the context of the pandemic it has a deeper impact on the quality of meeting the basic needs of the community. Simultaneously, anti-corruption with the spirit of retributive justice that uses interception is considered quite effective. debate use of interception in the anti-corruption as a human rights violations, can be ravel by looking back at the principles of proportionality and legal protection. while to prevent of abuse of interception authority, appropriate mechanisms are needed. It can be seen that the spirit of retributive justice in anti-corruption reciprocates the impact of corruption on human rights. On other hand, human rights approach to prevent abuse of interception in anti-corruption.
Research Interests:
The complexities of land and natural resource cases involve multiple stakeholders ranging from the government and security forces to corporations. The conflicts that drive these cases are reflected in the Indonesian Commission on Human... more
The complexities of land and natural resource cases involve multiple stakeholders ranging from the government and security forces to corporations. The conflicts that drive these cases are reflected in the Indonesian Commission on Human Rights data and in complaints from civil society. One contributing issue is driven by regulatory factors in the agrarian sector that is not in line with international human rights principles and norms. The analysis of these problems will be described in three discussions: one identifying the meaning of agrarian followed by a model for internalizing human rights instruments and principles in domestic regulations, and one affirming the responsibilities of the State and of corporations in the business. This paper concludes that differences in agrarian terms in various laws cause problems in norms and practices that affect multiple conflicts. Second, it emphasizes the urgency with which key players must evaluate different sectoral rules related to land an...
Research Interests:
Development is part of the manifestation of human rights, including infrastructure development which need land on the implementation. Land acquisition for public interest giving consequences on the increasing of agrarian conflicts,... more
Development is part of the manifestation of human rights, including infrastructure development which need land on the implementation. Land acquisition for public interest giving consequences on the increasing of agrarian conflicts, usually triggered by unfair compensation received by land owners. This research aim to describe (1) how regulatory aspects of Law nr. 2/2012 concerning land acquisition for public interest related to formulation of its viability and fairness, and (2) how appraisal conducted the assessment (Public Assesor Agent), given the authority to conduct assessment of attributive replace losses from the perspective of human rights. This study use qualitative methods. Primary data collection was conducted by directed interviews and secondary data was gathered through study literature. The results show that Law Ne. 2/2012 is unclear in decribing the criteria of viable and fair compensation based on human right norm, as well as there is no standard instrument to assess ...
Research Interests:
In the history of Indonesia, civil-military relations changed in the reformasi era with the separation of the military and the police, resulting in the removal of the dual-function doctrine and military reform. Despite so, two decades... more
In the history of Indonesia, civil-military relations changed in the reformasi era with the separation of the military and the police, resulting in the removal of the dual-function doctrine and military reform. Despite so, two decades after reformasi has not formed a standard and ideal mechanism to govern civil-military relations within the framework of objective civilian control. This paper addresses issues regarding (a) how the dual-function concept and internal reform within the military; (b) regulatory issues that govern military operations other than war; (c) the ideal model of civil-military relations in Indonesia to ensure democratic life and an overview of the siyāsah sharʻiyyah aspects. Using descriptive qualitative method and conducting discussions with military and human rights experts, this paper demonstrates that military reform in Indonesia after the New Order has not yet been fruitful to accomplish the mission to form professional soldiers. The military is still invol...
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Pemerintah bersama DPR membentuk omnibus law melalui UU No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja, regulasi ini ditujukan untuk peningkatan ekosistem investasi dengan merubah, menghapus dan membentuk norma baru dari berbagai regulasi... more
Pemerintah bersama DPR membentuk omnibus law melalui UU No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja, regulasi ini ditujukan untuk peningkatan ekosistem investasi dengan merubah, menghapus dan membentuk norma baru dari berbagai regulasi sektoral. Proses penyusunan regulasi dinilai tertutup, publik baru mengetahui norma-norma ketika naskah akademik dan draf disampaikan kepada DPR pada 12 Februari 2020, ternyata substansi omnibus law berimplikasi pada potensi pemunduran dalam perlindungan hak ekonomi, sosial dan budaya. Berdasarkan pada hal tersebut, penelitian ini akan menjawab rumusan masalah: (1) bagaimana konsepsi progressive realization dalam pemenuhan hak ekonomi, sosial dan budaya; (2) bagaimana pandangan terhadap muatan omnibus law Cipta Kerja yang bersinggungan dengan hak asasi manusia. Metode penelitian yang dilakukan adalah kualitatif dengan penyajian deskriptif. Pengumpulan data primer dilakukan dengan permintaan keterangan anggota parlemen, akademisi/ahli, dan aktivis, sedang...
Presiden Joko Widodo telah melantik Anggota Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang diberikan mandat pengawasan dan perijinan penyadapan. Pembentuan Dewan Pengawas ini didasarkan pada Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun... more
Presiden Joko Widodo telah melantik Anggota Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang diberikan mandat pengawasan dan perijinan penyadapan. Pembentuan Dewan Pengawas ini didasarkan pada Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 yang merupakan revisi Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002, yang dalam proses politiknya memantik penolakan publik dan demonstrasi yang berujung kekerasan. Penyadapan dalam aspek penegakan hukum menjadi hal krusial karena berkaitan pembatasan hak asasi manusia terutama kebebasan pribadi ( privacy rights ) dan bagaimana meletakan posisi Dewan Pengawas dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, penelitian ini menjawab rumusan masalah: (1) bagaimana pengaturan pembatasan hak atas kebebasan pribadi ( privacy right) dalam prespektif hak asasi manusia dan relasinya dalam penegakan hukum pidana; (2) bagaimana muatan materi dalam UU Nomor 19 tahun 2019 mengenai penyadapan dan perbandingan dengan konsep ideal penyadapan dalam keran...
Research Interests:
The upsurge of terror attacks in various regions of Indonesia in 2018, gave rise to the government and parliament effort to immediately revise Law No. 15 of 2003, which was considered inadequate in eradicating criminal acts of terrorism.... more
The upsurge of terror attacks in various regions of Indonesia in 2018, gave rise to the government and parliament effort to immediately revise Law No. 15 of 2003, which was considered inadequate in eradicating criminal acts of terrorism. The awareness of all parties involved ultimately accelerates the dynamics of the legislation process. Finally, on June 21, 2018 President Joko Widodo passed Law No. 5 of 2018 as a stronger basis in eradicating criminal acts of terrorism and seeking to proportionally protect human rights. Against those backgrounds, this study will look at (a) the legislation process in the formation of Law No. 5 of 2018, and (b) review of the practice of human rights principles and norms of Law No. 5 of 2018. This study uses a qualitative method, with descriptive normative presentation. Primary data sources are based on interviews with the Chairperson of the Working Committee of Bill on Terrorism, human rights activists, and government representatives. The results of...
Keberadaan UU Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum memberikan legitimasi dan dukungan percepatan pelaksanaan proyek pembangunan infrastruktur yang sedang masif dilakukan pemerintah. Meskipun... more
Keberadaan UU Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum memberikan legitimasi dan dukungan percepatan pelaksanaan proyek pembangunan infrastruktur yang sedang masif dilakukan pemerintah. Meskipun demikian, secara empiris terdapat implikasi yang bersinggungan dengan hak asasi manusia terutama dalam aspek pengadaan tanah. Data pengaduan di Komnas HAM berkait kasus infrastruktur menjadi indikasi akan persoalan tersebut. Oleh karena itu penelitian ini dilakukan untuk melihat norma-norma yang terkandung dalam UU No. 2/2012 dari prespektif HAM dengan mendasarkan pada instrumen dan prinsip hak asasi manusia, termasuk tanggung jawab dengan korporasi/BUMN selaku pelaksana. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif, pendekatan deskriptif. Pengumpulan data primer dilakukan dengan wawancara terarah terhadap korban, pemerintah dan ahli, sedangkan data sekunder bersumber dari berbagai literatur. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan norma hak asasi manusi...
Keberadaan UU Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum memberikan legitimasi dan dukungan percepatan pelaksanaan proyek pembangunan infrastruktur yang sedang masif dilakukan pemerintah. Meskipun... more
Keberadaan UU Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum memberikan legitimasi dan dukungan percepatan pelaksanaan proyek pembangunan infrastruktur yang sedang masif dilakukan pemerintah. Meskipun demikian, secara empiris terdapat implikasi yang bersinggungan dengan hak asasi manusia terutama dalam aspek pengadaan tanah. Data pengaduan di Komnas HAM berkait kasus infrastruktur menjadi indikasi akan persoalan tersebut. Oleh karena itu penelitian ini dilakukan untuk melihat norma-norma yang terkandung dalam UU No. 2/2012 dari prespektif HAM dengan mendasarkan pada instrumen dan prinsip hak asasi manusia, termasuk tanggung jawab dengan korporasi/BUMN selaku pelaksana. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif, pendekatan deskriptif. Pengumpulan data primer dilakukan dengan wawancara terarah terhadap korban, pemerintah dan ahli, sedangkan data sekunder bersumber dari berbagai literatur. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan norma hak asasi manusi...
Tapping in a human rights perspective is a form of limitation of the right to privacy. As an effort to guarantee human rights protection, tapping as a part of The Interception of Communication Bill arrangements must be following the... more
Tapping in a human rights perspective is a form of limitation of the right to privacy. As an effort to guarantee human rights protection, tapping as a part of The Interception of Communication Bill arrangements must be following the principles of human rights restrictions. Some of the anomalies in The Interception of Communication Bill appear in vague forms and open up the broad ways of potential violations of individual rights. For this reason, the principles of legality and prudence as a form of control over government actions need to offset the urgency of tapping. Data collection methods use discussions and interviews to enrich and test secondary data findings. This research stipulates that The Interception of Communication Bill use tapping as an induced instrument in criminal law enforcement. At the same time, tapping is regulated regardless of the readiness of the legal apparatus; this naturally raises technical problems in the matter of implementation and opens the door to abuse of authority. Furthermore, based on the need for comprehensive regulation, it is necessary to look at a comprehensive regulatory scheme in the legal system. The
Research Interests:
The upsurge of terror attacks in various regions of Indonesia in 2018, gave rise to the government and parliament effort to immediately revise Law No. 15 of 2003, which was considered inadequate in eradicating criminal acts of terrorism.... more
The upsurge of terror attacks in various regions of Indonesia in 2018, gave rise to the government and parliament effort to immediately revise Law No. 15 of 2003, which was considered inadequate in eradicating criminal acts of terrorism. The awareness of all parties involved ultimately accelerates the dynamics of the legislation process. Finally, on June 21, 2018 President Joko Widodo passed Law No. 5 of 2018 as a stronger basis in eradicating criminal acts of terrorism and seeking to proportionally protect human rights. Against those backgrounds, this study will look at (a) the legislation process in the formation of Law No. 5 of 2018, and (b) review of the practice of human rights principles and norms of Law No. 5 of 2018. This study uses a qualitative method, with descriptive normative presentation. Primary data sources are based on interviews with the Chairperson of the Working Committee of Bill on Terrorism, human rights activists, and government representatives. The results of this study indicate that legally in the legislation process Law No. 5 of 2018 fulfills the established procedures, but the principles and norms of human rights have not become the main reference in the formation of legal material, especially the issue of arrest, detention, the changing from material to formal offences, interception, and inconsistency of criminal justice system through military involvement. Based on this, we need to encourage a limited revision of Law No. 5 of 2018, so that the eradication of terrorism is stronger and human rights principles are respected, as an embodiment of a democratic rule of law.
Peningkatan aksi teror pada 2018, mendorong pemerintah dan DPR melakukan revisi terhadap UU No. 15 Tahun 2003 yang dinilai tidak cukup memadai dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana terorisme. Kesadaran semua pihak telah mempercepat proses legislasi dan pada 21 Juni 2018 Presiden Joko Widodo mengesahkan UU No. 5 Tahun 2018. UU hasil revisi ini diharapkan lebih memperkokoh dasar pemberantasan tindak pidana terorisme dan melindungi HAM secara lebih proposional. Bertitik tolak pada hal tersebut, kajian ini akan melihat proses legislasi dalam pembentukan UU No. 5 Tahun 2018 dan meninjau penerapan asas dan norma HAM dalam UU No. 5 Tahun 2018. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan penyajian deskriptif normatif. Sumber data primer diperoleh melalui wawancara dengan Ketua Panja RUU Terorisme, aktivis HAM, dan perwakilan pemerintah. Hasil kajian menunjukkan, secara legal formal, proses legislasi UU No. 5 Tahun 2018 memenuhi prosedur yang ditetapkan, namun dari aspek substansial masih belum sepenuhnya selaras dengan asas dan norma HAM, terutama persoalan penangkapan, penahanan, perubahan delik materiil menjadi formil, penyadapan, dan inkonsistensi criminal justice system melalui pelibatan militer. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, revisi terbatas terhadap UU No. 5 Tahun 2018 perlu dilakukan agar penegakan hukum pemberantasan terorisme lebih kuat dan HAM dijunjung tinggi sebagai perwujudan negara hukum demokratis.
Peningkatan aksi teror pada 2018, mendorong pemerintah dan DPR melakukan revisi terhadap UU No. 15 Tahun 2003 yang dinilai tidak cukup memadai dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana terorisme. Kesadaran semua pihak telah mempercepat proses legislasi dan pada 21 Juni 2018 Presiden Joko Widodo mengesahkan UU No. 5 Tahun 2018. UU hasil revisi ini diharapkan lebih memperkokoh dasar pemberantasan tindak pidana terorisme dan melindungi HAM secara lebih proposional. Bertitik tolak pada hal tersebut, kajian ini akan melihat proses legislasi dalam pembentukan UU No. 5 Tahun 2018 dan meninjau penerapan asas dan norma HAM dalam UU No. 5 Tahun 2018. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan penyajian deskriptif normatif. Sumber data primer diperoleh melalui wawancara dengan Ketua Panja RUU Terorisme, aktivis HAM, dan perwakilan pemerintah. Hasil kajian menunjukkan, secara legal formal, proses legislasi UU No. 5 Tahun 2018 memenuhi prosedur yang ditetapkan, namun dari aspek substansial masih belum sepenuhnya selaras dengan asas dan norma HAM, terutama persoalan penangkapan, penahanan, perubahan delik materiil menjadi formil, penyadapan, dan inkonsistensi criminal justice system melalui pelibatan militer. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, revisi terbatas terhadap UU No. 5 Tahun 2018 perlu dilakukan agar penegakan hukum pemberantasan terorisme lebih kuat dan HAM dijunjung tinggi sebagai perwujudan negara hukum demokratis.
Research Interests:
In the history of Indonesia, civil-military relations changed in the reformasi era with the separation of the military and the police, resulting in the removal of the dual-function doctrine and military reform. Despite so, two decades... more
In the history of Indonesia, civil-military relations changed in the reformasi era with the separation of the military and the police, resulting in the removal of the dual-function doctrine and military reform. Despite so, two decades after reformasi has not formed a standard and ideal mechanism to govern civil-military relations within the framework of objective civilian control. This paper addresses issues regarding (a) how the dual-function concept and internal reform within the military; (b) regulatory issues that govern military operations other than war; (c) the ideal model of civil-military relations in Indonesia to ensure democratic life and an overview of the siyāsah sharʻiyyah aspects. Using descriptive qualitative method and conducting discussions with military and human rights experts, this paper demonstrates that military reform in Indonesia after the New Order has not yet been fruitful to accomplish the mission to form professional soldiers. The military is still involved in political and civilian life under the pretext that there is no military assistance law. As a consequence, the ideal model of civilian control that puts the military under the control of civilian authority according to siyāsah sharʻiyyah principle has not been fully successful and effective. Abstrak: Dalam sejarah Indonesia, relasi sipil militer berubah pada era reformasi dengan pemisahan militer dan kepolisian yang berdampak pada pencabutan doktrin dwifungsi dan reformasi militer. Meskipun demikian, dalam dua dekade era reformasi, tampaknya belum ada mekanisme yang baku dan ideal yang mengatur relasi sipil militer dalam kerangka kontrol sipil objektif. Tulisan ini akan menjawab permasalahan mengenai (a) bagaimana konsepsi dwifungsi dan reformasi internal di lingkup militer; (b) persoalan regulasi yang mengatur operasi militer selain perang; (c) bagaimana model ideal relasi sipil dan militer di
President Joko Widodo has appointed a member of the Supervisory Board of the Corruption Eradication Commission that has been given the mandate of supervisory and licensing of interception. The formation of the KPK Monitoring Board is... more
President Joko Widodo has appointed a member of the Supervisory Board of the Corruption Eradication Commission that has been given the mandate of supervisory and licensing of interception. The formation of the KPK Monitoring Board is based on Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the revision of Law Number 30 of 2002, which in its political process sparked public resistance and demonstrations. Interception in law enforcement is crucial because it relates to restrictions on human rights especially personal freedom (privacy rights) and how to position the KPK Supervisory Board in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. This paper addresses issues regarding (1) how to regulate
restrictions on the right to personal freedom (privacy right) in the perspective of human rights and their relations in the enforcement of criminal law; (2) how the material content in Law Number 19 of 2019 regarding interception and comparison with the ideal concept in the framework of law enforcement; (3) how to review the existence of the KPK Supervisory Board in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. This writing uses a descriptive qualitative method and conducting discussions with experts, law enforcement agencies, whilst the secondary data are from kinds of
literature. This study concludes that interception as a privacy right in law enforcement can be limited/reduced,
the conditions must be regulated by law. However, in Law Number 19 of 2019, the material is not ideal and has
the potential to violate human rights and the need for an evaluation of the existence of the Supervisory Board
restrictions on the right to personal freedom (privacy right) in the perspective of human rights and their relations in the enforcement of criminal law; (2) how the material content in Law Number 19 of 2019 regarding interception and comparison with the ideal concept in the framework of law enforcement; (3) how to review the existence of the KPK Supervisory Board in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. This writing uses a descriptive qualitative method and conducting discussions with experts, law enforcement agencies, whilst the secondary data are from kinds of
literature. This study concludes that interception as a privacy right in law enforcement can be limited/reduced,
the conditions must be regulated by law. However, in Law Number 19 of 2019, the material is not ideal and has
the potential to violate human rights and the need for an evaluation of the existence of the Supervisory Board
Research Interests:
Development is part of the manifestation of human rights, including infrastructure development which need land on the implementation. Land acquisition for public interest giving consequences on the increasing of agrarian conflicts,... more
Development is part of the manifestation of human rights, including infrastructure development which need land on the implementation. Land acquisition for public interest giving consequences on the increasing of agrarian conflicts, usually triggered by unfair compensation received by land owners. This research aim to describe (1) how regulatory aspects of Law nr. 2/2012 concerning land acquisition for public interest related to formulation of its viability and fairness, and (2) how appraisal conducted the assessment (Public Assesor Agent), given the authority to conduct assessment of attributive replace losses from the perspective of human rights. This study use qualitative methods. Primary data collection was conducted by directed interviews and secondary data was gathered through study literature. The results show that Law Ne. 2/2012 is unclear in decribing the criteria of viable and fair compensation based on human right norm, as well as there is no standard instrument to assess the compensation. These incompabilities were related to the term of viable and equitable for compensation as part of livelihood restoration of affected people both material and non-material. Intisari: Pembangunan merupakan perwujudan hak asasi manusia, termasuk pembangunan infrastruktur yang membutuhkan tanah. Implikasinya pengadaan tanah bagi kepentingan umum berdampak pada peningkatan konflik agraria, terutama dipengaruhi faktor ganti kerugian yang dinilai belum layak dan adil. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menggambarkan (1) bagaimana aspek regulasi dalam UU Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 yang mengatur pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum terkait rumusan kriteria layak dan adil, dan (2) bagaimana penilaian dilakukan oleh appraisal Kantor Jasa Penilai Publik (KJPP) yang diberikan kewenangan atributif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif. Pengumpulan data primer dilakukan dengan wawancara terarah dan data sekunder bersumber dari berbagai literatur. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan regulasi ganti kerugian layak dan adil dalam UU Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 belum jelas kriterianya dan sesuai dengan norma hak asasi manusia. Demikian halnya dalam aspek penilaian ganti kerugian belum ada standar dan instrumen baku. Ketidaksesuaian ini berkaitan dengan esensi layak dan adil yang memiliki unsur penggantian untuk upaya pemulihan korban terdampak, baik bersifat material dan imaterial agar mampu bangkit dan terpenuhi hak asasinya. Kata kunci: Pengadaan tanah, pembangunan infrastruktur, ganti kerugian, HAM, Indonesia. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan
Research Interests:
The Indonesian General Elections Commission (Komisi Pemilihan Umum/KPU) noted that the 2020 general elections covered 270 regions consisting of 9 provincies, 224 regencies and 37 municipalities. Based on the Final Voter List, there... more
The Indonesian General Elections Commission (Komisi Pemilihan Umum/KPU) noted that the 2020 general elections covered 270 regions consisting of 9 provincies, 224 regencies and 37 municipalities. Based on the Final Voter List, there were 101 million voters, with an additional 3 million (2.90%) of new voters, involving 3.3 million election officials 15 who served in 299 thousand polling stations. There are two perspectives in Indonesia in responding to the elections during the COVID-19 pandemic. First is to continue to hold it by implementating strict health protocols because regional elections are important that 270 regional leaders have ended their positions in February 2021 and the Government has difficulty in appointing temporary officials; and the holding of local elections is expected to stimulate a recession in the economic sector.1 Second is to focus on handling the spread of COVID-19, so that the right to public health is guaranteed and then it will allow regional head elections2; the reason for skipping the election is to avoid the politicization of government assistance by the incumbents to get votes at election time.