Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Dr. Cheri Scott, Ph.D.
  • Cincinnati, OH
Environmental injustice has been found to have an adverse effect on poor urban and rural communities and is considered a social justice issue. It is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore environmental injustice in cases where poor... more
Environmental injustice has been found to have an adverse effect on poor urban and rural communities and is considered a social justice issue. It is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore environmental injustice in cases where poor communities suffer from disproportionate ecological burdens that threaten their livelihood.The following paper highlight the importance of investigating the effects of environmental and food injustice in connection to social disorganization within poor urban communities. Additionally, the paper examine if residents affected by food deserts are more at risk of being exposed to violent diets to see if there is any indication that poor diet plays a role in influencing the behavior of those who consume these diets.
This research study examines the Flint water crisis to determine if Flint residents were the target of a degenerative policy. The study employs critical ethnography to explore the development and implementation of environmental water... more
This research study examines the Flint water crisis to determine if Flint residents were the target of a degenerative policy. The study employs critical ethnography to explore the development and implementation of environmental water policy and investigate state-appointed legislator's decision to switch water sources in the city of Flint, Michigan, a predominantly low-income and minority community. In addition to using critical ethnography as a method, the study is interdisciplinary, integrating secondary data from news reports, governmental and nongovernmental documents, and budgets. The residents in Flint, Michigan water source was switched from Lake Huron (Detroit) a source used for more than 50 years to the Flint River. The water switch resulted in lead-contaminated water that poisoned more than 7,900 children and caused a widespread outbreak of Legionnaires' disease.
Case Abstract This case study explores issues of power relative to the intersectionality of race and gender in the judiciary. It illuminates structural and systemic issues, that when viewed through a race and gendered lens presents an... more
Case Abstract
This case study explores issues of power relative to the intersectionality of race and gender in the judiciary. It illuminates structural and systemic issues, that when viewed through a race and gendered lens presents an understanding of the level of resistance, obstacles, and challenges faced by African American women in particular who rise to leadership roles and seek to challenge the status quo. Judge Tracie Hunter is the first African American and the first Democrat to ever become a judge in the juvenile court in Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. Judge Hunter won her seat after a heated court battle and a series of appeals, spearheaded by Hamilton County Prosecutor, Joe Deters, who represented the Hamilton County Board of Elections, after Hunter sued the Board of Elections for voter suppression. Inevitably, the county was required to count more than 800 votes from majority black precincts, when it was found that poll-workers were responsible for sending voters to the wrong booth, which caused their votes to be disqualified. This case surrounds Hamilton County’s problem of a backlog of cases and background on the witch hunt that Judge Hunter faced in her first 18 months on the bench, and the tremendous injustices that are directed towards the children in the Hamilton County judicial system, which prompted Hunter to run for judge in the first place. Over 80% of the children served in Hamilton County are African American children who have for years been subjected to a school-to-prison pipeline. The case exposes the numerous violations of their civil, constitutional, and human rights; and presents an analysis of the collusion, strategic privatization of the juvenile detention facility, administrative policy changes, and political maneuvers on the part of Republican Party government officials in Hamilton County, to take the power of the judiciary and oversight of the $30,000,000 budget, the second largest budget in Hamilton County, out of the hands of elected Judge Hunter and putting it in the hands of the judge that she defeated in the 2010 elections.
Research Interests:
This case study explores issues of power relative to the intersectionality of race and gender in the judiciary. It illuminates structural and systemic issues, that when viewed through a race and gendered lens presents an understanding of... more
This case study explores issues of power relative to the intersectionality of race and gender in the judiciary. It illuminates structural and systemic issues, that when viewed through a race and gendered lens presents an understanding of the level of resistance, obstacles, and challenges faced by African American women in particular who rise to leadership roles and seek to challenge the status quo. Judge Tracie Hunter is the first African American and the first Democrat to ever become a judge in the juvenile court in Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. Judge Hunter won her seat after a heated court battle and a series of appeals, spearheaded by Hamilton County Prosecutor, Joe Deters, who represented the Hamilton County Board of Elections, after Hunter sued the Board of Elections for voter suppression. Inevitably, the county was required to count more than 800 votes from majority black precincts, when it was found that poll-workers were responsible for sending voters to the wrong booth, which caused their votes to be disqualified. This case surrounds Hamilton County’s problem of a backlog of cases and background on the witch hunt that Judge Hunter faced in her first 18 months on the bench, and the tremendous injustices that are directed towards the children in the Hamilton County judicial system, which prompted Hunter to run for judge in the first place. Over 80% of the children served in Hamilton County are African American children who have for years been subjected to a school-to-prison pipeline. The case exposes the numerous violations of their civil, constitutional, and human rights; and presents an analysis of the collusion, strategic privatization of the juvenile detention facility, administrative policy changes, and political maneuvers on the part of Republican Party government officials in Hamilton County, to take the power of the judiciary and oversight of the $30,000,000 budget, the second largest budget in Hamilton County, out of the hands of elected Judge Hunter and putting it in the hands of the judge that she defeated in the 2010 elections.
Research Interests:
The aim of this paper critically examines degenerative policy that allow hazardous facilities to occupy minority and low-income communities suffering from a disproportionate amount of environmental injustices. Research suggest minority... more
The aim of this paper critically examines degenerative policy that allow hazardous facilities to occupy minority and low-income communities suffering from a disproportionate amount of environmental injustices. Research suggest minority and low-income communities face a larger burden of toxic pollutants when it comes to the placement of hazardous waste facilities. This paper reveals how the health of community members are impacted by hazardous waste facilities.  Additionally, environmental hazards in underprivileged communities are a result of hazardous waste facilities centered in the locale of low-income neighborhoods resulting in various pollutants.  These hazardous facilities disportionately harm low income, minority communities and remains unresolved even after numerous complaints are filed with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (Hiar, 2011). It is ideal that social justice reflects the differences that constitute a democratic model that represents equality and equal participation for all citizens. However, a closer examination of environmental policy reveals “solid evidence of discrimination” (Cutter, 1995) in the form of environmental injustices constructed on class, race, and geographic locations.  All of the classifications mentioned above demonstrate differences that exclude certain voices from benefiting in a participatory democracy.
Research Interests:
The questions examined in this paper are what dynamics contribute to social disorganization in poor communities and how do mechanisms involving social disorganization lead to lower life expectancy among poor African-American populations.... more
The questions examined in this paper are what dynamics contribute to social disorganization in poor communities and how do mechanisms involving social disorganization lead to lower life expectancy among poor African-American populations.  Jensen (2003) suggest, social disorganization is the deterioration of communal structures which include “family, school, church, and local government.” Furthermore, the focus of social disorganization in this paper focuses on poverty-stricken communities affected by social disorganization. Social disorganization theory contends there are several structural influences that lead to social disorganization in destitute populations; structural influences include low economic status, ethnic heterogeneity, and residential mobility (Sampson & Grove, 1989) for marginalized citizens. Additionally, Sampson & Grove research suggest communities of color who experience social disorganization may experience a decline in their physical and mental health causing violent atmospheres.
Research Interests:
This paper highlights the methodology most policy analysts use when examining real world problems, a conventional positivist approach. Policy analysts using a positivist approach “believe the world is a fixed entity whose mysteries are... more
This paper highlights the methodology most policy analysts use when examining real world problems, a conventional positivist approach.  Policy analysts using a positivist approach “believe the world is a fixed entity whose mysteries are not beyond human comprehension” (O’Leary, 2007, loc. 1886). They believe that the social object can be studied scientifically. However, post-positivist social theorists criticize the positivist approach and “see the world as highly variable and ambiguous, and understand that knowing involves recognition of things like intuition, subjectivity, power, and worldview” (O’Leary, 2007, loc. 1890). Post-positivist proponents also reject the central tenets of positivism and believe that empirical methods used in social science is limited and inept of propagating “authentic accounts of a world that is constantly constructed through our actions and interaction” (O’Leary, 2007, loc. 1944).
The central theme of this paper is to assess the strengths and weaknesses found in both  positivist and post-positivist approach to environmental policy in order to reveal the advantages and shortcomings found in both perspectives. Additionally, an analysis of existing literature on the positivist and post-positivist continuum will help define the problems that are seen in the political struggles of environmental policy. This allows environmental racism to be examined within a framework to analyze and identify the problem definition, which will be discussed in the second section of this policy recommendation.
Additionally, the problem definition will outline how the problem with environmental racism is defined, what is missing in environmental policy, and finally a recommendation for a course of action that build on the scholarly work of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and other social justice advocates.
Research Interests:
This paper will chronicle low-income communities involvement, with environmental justice movements to see if there is a connection between Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Beloved Community” and grass-root environmental justice movements.... more
This paper will chronicle low-income communities involvement, with environmental justice movements to see if there is a connection between Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Beloved Community” and grass-root environmental justice movements. Three environmental justice matters will be examined in this paper to identify the following:
1. What a successful environmental grass roots movement look like.
2. How one community missed the opportunity to form an environmental grass roots movement.
3. How an environmental grass roots movement is emulating King’s vision of “The Beloved Community.”
These three narratives will explore whether or not Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s vision of the “Beloved Community” can transform communities into effective decision-making populations and act as a model to reverse environmental degradation.
Research Interests:
This case study explores issues of power relative to the intersectionality of race and gender in the judiciary. It illuminates structural and systemic issues, that when viewed through a race and gendered lens presents an understanding of... more
This case study explores issues of power relative to the intersectionality of race and gender in the judiciary. It illuminates structural and systemic issues, that when viewed through a race and gendered lens presents an understanding of the level of resistance, obstacles, and challenges faced by African American women in particular who rise to leadership roles and seek to challenge the status quo. Judge Tracie Hunter is the first African American and the first Democrat to ever become a judge in the juvenile court in Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. Judge Hunter won her seat after a heated court battle and a series of appeals, spearheaded by Hamilton County Prosecutor, Joe Deters, who represented the Hamilton County Board of Elections, after Hunter sued the Board of Elections for voter suppression. Inevitably, the county was required to count more than 800 votes from majority black precincts, when it was found that poll-workers were responsible for sending voters to the wrong booth, which caused their votes to be disqualified. This case surrounds Hamilton County’s problem of a backlog of cases and background on the witch hunt that Judge Hunter faced in her first 18 months on the bench, and the tremendous injustices that are directed towards the children in the Hamilton County judicial system, which prompted Hunter to run for judge in the first place. Over 80% of the children served in Hamilton County are African American children who have for years been subjected to a school-to-prison pipeline. The case exposes the numerous violations of their civil, constitutional, and human rights; and presents an analysis of the collusion, strategic privatization of the juvenile detention facility, administrative policy changes, and political maneuvers on the part of Republican Party government officials in Hamilton County, to take the power of the judiciary and oversight of the $30,000,000 budget, the second largest budget in Hamilton County, out of the hands of elected Judge Hunter and putting it in the hands of the judge that she defeated in the 2010 elections.
Research Interests: