- Latin Epigraphy, Roman Economy, Instrumentum domesticum, Interregional Relations in roman time, Yenikapı Marmaray-Metro Excavation (İstanbul), Byzantine economy, and 6 moreArchaeology of Roman Dalmatia, Early Byzantine Pottery production, Globular Amphorae, Trade and Exchange during 7th and 8th c. A.D., Near Eastern Archaeology, Byzantine Amphorae, Amphora Stamps, Food in antiquity, and Hellenistic archaeologyedit
The standardization of transport amphorae provides a window into the scales, organizations, and technological practices behind ancient Mediterranean production, and thus also the coordination and complexity of past economic systems. As... more
The standardization of transport amphorae provides a window into the scales, organizations, and technological practices behind ancient Mediterranean production, and thus also the coordination and complexity of past economic
systems. As our greatest archaeological evidence for the packaging and distribution of bulk agricultural goods over
long distances, transport amphorae represent a fundamental technology that responded to and influenced logistics
and processes of Mediterranean exchange. This contribution sets forth the volume’s overall intellectual questions for
interrogating transport amphorae along with a framework – definitions, parameters, and contexts – through which
standardization (and variation) may be explored analytically, in the process introducing the individual case study
chapters that follow and their broader economic questions and intersections.
Approaching this material evidence requires a careful definition, and here we emphasize the concept of standardization as not a specific state of being but rather a process – i.e., a process of ›standardizing‹ – and related closely
in turn to the process of diversification. From an archaeological perspective, standardization can be reflected in
different aspects, such as formal features, volumetric homogeneity, production volumes and the related numbers and
structures of workshops, or the presence of epigraphic evidence. However, we also discuss the economic, social,
political, and other contexts in which different forms of standardized production may have appeared, as well as the
parameters behind and mechanisms that facilitated it. After introducing each of the case studies, which range from
pre-Roman to late Byzantine and from western Iberia to the Black Sea and Levant, we draw together certain themes
and questions that link the volume’s intellectual agenda and historical implications.
We examine the distinctly regional settings and shared production traditions that gave rise to different standard
shapes and sizes, as well as the coordination and mutual influence across regions that are particularly evident in the
Roman period. Questions emerge regarding how such containers communicated information and for what audiences;
how concerns over transmitting information intersected with practical logistics of container handling, shipment, and
exchange; what level of precision potters and merchants were able to (and cared to) achieve in controlling linear
dimensions and capacities; and what mechanisms were available to transmit techniques and knowledge of standardized production across regions and generations. No less important are questions surrounding how the standardization
of amphorae reflected the potential standardization of products – or origins and styles of products – they contained.
The chapter ends by exploring the broader questions of ancient economic history to which such analyses might
contribute, including complicating scholarly assumptions regarding singular notions of ›efficiency‹ in production
and exchange. Much work remains to be done in exploring the finer contours of potential links between standardization and scales of economic activity, ranging from small producers and local trade to the mass production and interregional shipment for large urban markets that characterized the Roman and Byzantine worlds. By identifying at least
some fundamental questions that remain among these chapters – not least the relative roles of institutions like state
and military supply versus market-based exchange in driving the different trajectories toward standardization and
diversification – we hope to highlight the wide range of productive questions and analytical paths open for future work.
systems. As our greatest archaeological evidence for the packaging and distribution of bulk agricultural goods over
long distances, transport amphorae represent a fundamental technology that responded to and influenced logistics
and processes of Mediterranean exchange. This contribution sets forth the volume’s overall intellectual questions for
interrogating transport amphorae along with a framework – definitions, parameters, and contexts – through which
standardization (and variation) may be explored analytically, in the process introducing the individual case study
chapters that follow and their broader economic questions and intersections.
Approaching this material evidence requires a careful definition, and here we emphasize the concept of standardization as not a specific state of being but rather a process – i.e., a process of ›standardizing‹ – and related closely
in turn to the process of diversification. From an archaeological perspective, standardization can be reflected in
different aspects, such as formal features, volumetric homogeneity, production volumes and the related numbers and
structures of workshops, or the presence of epigraphic evidence. However, we also discuss the economic, social,
political, and other contexts in which different forms of standardized production may have appeared, as well as the
parameters behind and mechanisms that facilitated it. After introducing each of the case studies, which range from
pre-Roman to late Byzantine and from western Iberia to the Black Sea and Levant, we draw together certain themes
and questions that link the volume’s intellectual agenda and historical implications.
We examine the distinctly regional settings and shared production traditions that gave rise to different standard
shapes and sizes, as well as the coordination and mutual influence across regions that are particularly evident in the
Roman period. Questions emerge regarding how such containers communicated information and for what audiences;
how concerns over transmitting information intersected with practical logistics of container handling, shipment, and
exchange; what level of precision potters and merchants were able to (and cared to) achieve in controlling linear
dimensions and capacities; and what mechanisms were available to transmit techniques and knowledge of standardized production across regions and generations. No less important are questions surrounding how the standardization
of amphorae reflected the potential standardization of products – or origins and styles of products – they contained.
The chapter ends by exploring the broader questions of ancient economic history to which such analyses might
contribute, including complicating scholarly assumptions regarding singular notions of ›efficiency‹ in production
and exchange. Much work remains to be done in exploring the finer contours of potential links between standardization and scales of economic activity, ranging from small producers and local trade to the mass production and interregional shipment for large urban markets that characterized the Roman and Byzantine worlds. By identifying at least
some fundamental questions that remain among these chapters – not least the relative roles of institutions like state
and military supply versus market-based exchange in driving the different trajectories toward standardization and
diversification – we hope to highlight the wide range of productive questions and analytical paths open for future work.
Research Interests:
This paper analyzes the development of amphora production in a specific region in the northern Mediterranean coastal corner of Hispania Citerior, ancient Layetania. The purpose is to search for the aims and reasons behind the achievement... more
This paper analyzes the development of amphora production in a specific region in the northern Mediterranean coastal
corner of Hispania Citerior, ancient Layetania. The purpose is to search for the aims and reasons behind the achievement of a high standardization level as seen upon analysis ranging from the first stages of production in the late 2nd century B.C. to its decline in the late 1st century A.D. The central Catalan coastal region must be regarded as a special case
study due to the current large archaeological knowledge based on the amphora epigraphy, the petrographical studies,
the large number of excavated kiln sites, as well as the presence of its amphorae in their most important import places
and shipwrecks. This large quantity of evidence provides the foundation for an in-depth analysis of the formal and
volumetric standardization achieved by Layetanian amphora production. However, we believe our study would be
unsuccessful if we were not to pay attention to the essential economic, social, and politic factors that were reflected and
determined the production and standardization level of these transport vessels. These factors were closely linked to the
development of the western Roman economy and were much broader than the geographical limits of central Catalonia,
including not only other regions in the Iberian Peninsula but Gallia Narbonensis and Thyrrenian Italy as well.
The observed standardization process of the Layetanian amphorae was not a lineal development but something
that we can perceive in two relevant moments. The first took place in the central decades of the 1st century B.C. when
the production of Italic or pre-Roman Iberian amphora types was gradually replaced by the first provincial amphorae.
These first amphorae seem to have lacked a formal and volumetric standardization and can be regarded as transitional
types that developed into the Pascual 1 type at the beginning of the Augustan era. The second moment of change took
place from late Augustan times and can be regarded as something exceptional when compared with the development of
amphora production in most of the Roman provinces during early imperial times. Even if the production of Pascual 1
continued for some decades, in the workshops around the recently founded colony of Barcino a ›new‹ amphora type,
the so-called Dressel 3-2, based once again in Italian types, started to be produced. We argue that this shift in the formal
production of transport vessels in Layetania was motivated by the introduction of new owners of Italian origin, who
settled in and around Barcino, and also by the mutation of the main import markets, which from now on would be
placed in the central area of western Italy.
We are persuaded that Layetanian amphora production and its standardization is one of the most suitable examples
for understanding the interconnectedness of the Roman economy of late Republican and early imperial times. Future
data will surely nuance the current state of research, but in the following pages, a general overview of the standardization process can be seen, with its causes, consequences, and general repercussions on the provincial economies.
corner of Hispania Citerior, ancient Layetania. The purpose is to search for the aims and reasons behind the achievement of a high standardization level as seen upon analysis ranging from the first stages of production in the late 2nd century B.C. to its decline in the late 1st century A.D. The central Catalan coastal region must be regarded as a special case
study due to the current large archaeological knowledge based on the amphora epigraphy, the petrographical studies,
the large number of excavated kiln sites, as well as the presence of its amphorae in their most important import places
and shipwrecks. This large quantity of evidence provides the foundation for an in-depth analysis of the formal and
volumetric standardization achieved by Layetanian amphora production. However, we believe our study would be
unsuccessful if we were not to pay attention to the essential economic, social, and politic factors that were reflected and
determined the production and standardization level of these transport vessels. These factors were closely linked to the
development of the western Roman economy and were much broader than the geographical limits of central Catalonia,
including not only other regions in the Iberian Peninsula but Gallia Narbonensis and Thyrrenian Italy as well.
The observed standardization process of the Layetanian amphorae was not a lineal development but something
that we can perceive in two relevant moments. The first took place in the central decades of the 1st century B.C. when
the production of Italic or pre-Roman Iberian amphora types was gradually replaced by the first provincial amphorae.
These first amphorae seem to have lacked a formal and volumetric standardization and can be regarded as transitional
types that developed into the Pascual 1 type at the beginning of the Augustan era. The second moment of change took
place from late Augustan times and can be regarded as something exceptional when compared with the development of
amphora production in most of the Roman provinces during early imperial times. Even if the production of Pascual 1
continued for some decades, in the workshops around the recently founded colony of Barcino a ›new‹ amphora type,
the so-called Dressel 3-2, based once again in Italian types, started to be produced. We argue that this shift in the formal
production of transport vessels in Layetania was motivated by the introduction of new owners of Italian origin, who
settled in and around Barcino, and also by the mutation of the main import markets, which from now on would be
placed in the central area of western Italy.
We are persuaded that Layetanian amphora production and its standardization is one of the most suitable examples
for understanding the interconnectedness of the Roman economy of late Republican and early imperial times. Future
data will surely nuance the current state of research, but in the following pages, a general overview of the standardization process can be seen, with its causes, consequences, and general repercussions on the provincial economies.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
The archaeological site of La Longarina in Ostia has been partially excavated in two different field campaigns. Excavations in Longarina 1 were carried out in 1975 and in Longarina 2 in 2005. The two work areas were situated very close to... more
The archaeological site of La Longarina in Ostia has been partially excavated in two different field campaigns. Excavations in Longarina 1 were carried out in 1975 and in Longarina 2 in 2005. The two work areas were situated very close to each other, in the vast lagoon of Ostia connected with the sea on one side and elsewhere with the salt flats. Research has revealed the existence of a reclamation system of the marshland by the drainage of groundwater and by reinforcing the lagoon banks with soils mixed with various clayey materials. With this aim, during the late 1 st century BCE and first moments of the 1 st CE, large quantities of earth mixed with different materials, mainly pottery, were interleaved with deposits of complete or almost complete amphorae. With this contribution we aim to report a first preliminary study about the Longarina 2 depot, based on a first small campaign developed in November 2021. This depot is formed by 47 amphorae (fig. 3, tab. 1). From a chronological point of view there is a striking homogeneity with all the amphora types dated in the central decades of the 1 st century BCE; from a geographical perspective, most amphorae came from the Italian regions, especially from the central and north Adriatic (34) with a smaller quantity of those produced in different Tirrenian areas (4). However, extra-Italian regions such as the Iberian Peninsula (7) and North Africa (2) are present as well. This preliminary publication is the first step in a larger study about the whole context included in a broad scientific collaboration between the Archaeological Park of Ostia Antica, the Austrian Archaeological Institute (ÖAI), the
Research Interests:
Ephesos was one of the most important cities of antiquity. Settled in the heartland of a very productive region, the city had good road networks with the Anatolian inland and a main harbour open to the Aegean. Archaeology has shown... more
Ephesos was one of the most important cities of antiquity. Settled in the heartland of a very productive region, the
city had good road networks with the Anatolian inland and a main harbour open to the Aegean. Archaeology has
shown evidence of the arrival of commodities from the entire ancient world at Ephesos and the intense commercial activity of the city, even with remote regions. On the other hand, the exportation of Ephesian and Asia Minor
commodities is attested due to the presence, in almost every ancient site, of non-perishable materials produced and
exported from Ephesos. This paper attempts a first approach to the extremely complex archaeological and historical
question of the trade interconnectivity of Ephesos with other major commercial centres, in this case with two other
major cities: Carthage and Alexandria. These cities also acted as focal points for the distribution of commodities
from their territories as well as redistribution hubs of further commercial routes. The analysis of the epigraphic,
numismatic and above all the pottery evidence will reveal the existence of close ties between these cities.
city had good road networks with the Anatolian inland and a main harbour open to the Aegean. Archaeology has
shown evidence of the arrival of commodities from the entire ancient world at Ephesos and the intense commercial activity of the city, even with remote regions. On the other hand, the exportation of Ephesian and Asia Minor
commodities is attested due to the presence, in almost every ancient site, of non-perishable materials produced and
exported from Ephesos. This paper attempts a first approach to the extremely complex archaeological and historical
question of the trade interconnectivity of Ephesos with other major commercial centres, in this case with two other
major cities: Carthage and Alexandria. These cities also acted as focal points for the distribution of commodities
from their territories as well as redistribution hubs of further commercial routes. The analysis of the epigraphic,
numismatic and above all the pottery evidence will reveal the existence of close ties between these cities.
Research Interests:
La denominada "cantina" ha sido la principal prioridad del estudio arqueológico de la Casa de Ariadna desde 2013 hasta 2015. En su estado actual, la denominada cantina fue la bodega de la casa de Ariadna (ambiente 58), al me
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
n 2012, two of the authors conducted research in the amphora collection of the National Museum of Roman Art (Museo Nacional de Arte Romano/MNAR) in Mérida (Spain). Their attention was attracted by one of the museum's finds. It was an... more
n 2012, two of the authors conducted research in the amphora collection of the National Museum of Roman Art (Museo Nacional de Arte Romano/MNAR) in Mérida (Spain). Their attention was attracted by one of the museum's finds. It was an almost complete Beltrán 72 amphora, the fabric of which showed its production place to have been within the Cadiz Bay area (Spain). It bore a red-ink inscription on the neck and upper part of the body. Taking a good graphic copy of the inscription, the authors discussed it with several epigraphic and linguistic specialists, arriving at the conclusion that it was written using two alphabets, a Semitic one for the two upper lines, and Latin for the lowest one.
Because of this exceptional piece, already presented to the general public in the exhibition catalogue Ars Scribendi (Almeida 2014), the authors decided to conduct a closer examination of this amphora typology, Hebrew inscriptions found on amphorae and known to them, and to establish the context of this find within the important Roman and late antique Jewish community of Augusta Emerita and the Iberian Peninsula
Because of this exceptional piece, already presented to the general public in the exhibition catalogue Ars Scribendi (Almeida 2014), the authors decided to conduct a closer examination of this amphora typology, Hebrew inscriptions found on amphorae and known to them, and to establish the context of this find within the important Roman and late antique Jewish community of Augusta Emerita and the Iberian Peninsula