Twentieth-Century Music 14/2, 305–333 © Cambridge University Press, 2017
doi: 10.1017/S147857221700024X
Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports
VICTOR SZABO
Abstract
In the liner notes to his album Ambient 1: Music for Airports (1978), Brian Eno (1948–) defined Ambient
music in contradistinction to Muzak’s ‘derivative’ instrumental pop arrangements. Ambient music’s historians and
critics have often followed Eno by describing Ambient music as an alternative to conventional ‘background’ or
‘programmed’ music for commercial spaces. Such descriptions can be misleading, however, given that Ambient
music’s dominant mode of reception is selective personal consumption, not public administration. This article
investigates the aesthetics of Eno’s Airports, and elucidates the organizing role of the Ambient genre, within their
primary reception context of personal recorded music listening. A comparison with The Black Dog’s Music for
Real Airports (2010) shows how Ambient music then and now reflexively affords atmospheric use by translating
a sense of physical dwelling and passage into mixed musical moods. By expressing ambivalence about the reality
of airports and air travel, these Ambient records characteristically convey apprehension about the technological
administration of human experience – a phenomenon that includes personal recorded music listening.
Music for real airports?
On 24 April 2010, electronic musicians Martin Dust, Richard Dust, and Ken Downie, together
known as The Black Dog, debuted music from their forthcoming LP, Music for Real Airports,
to a sold-out gallery audience in their hometown of Sheffield, England. The trio treated
the audience to a live mix of field recordings and musical snippets from the album, many
of which they originally made using smartphones, portable keyboards, and laptops while
travelling through real airports. A local visual design team, Human, mixed digital animations
in conjunction with the set.1 The images, reported one member of Human, were meant to
expressively ‘amplify’ the music’s implications, such as ‘the movement you might get from
a conveyer belt, or being orchestrated in line, or the feeling you get when you look out of
a window and see things moving beneath you’.2 The Black Dog concurred that the music
and field recordings, even without a visual accompaniment, should conjure something of
‘the journey and the emotions’ involved in air travel.3 Their efforts proved fruitful when the
group released Real Airports commercially two weeks later on Soma Quality Recordings, a
Glaswegian independent label, to critical and fan praise (Figure 1).4
Email: vlszabo@gmail.com
1 For a short video documenting the event, featuring a sampling of various tracks from the album, see Vimeo, ‘Music
For Real Airports – Launch Event – Millennium Gallery, Sheffield’. http://vimeo.com/11892866.
2 The Black Dog and Human, ‘Music for Real Airports’, Article Magazine, 22 April 2010, 59.
3 The Black Dog and Human, ‘Music for Real Airports’, 59.
4 Daniel Petry, review of Music for Real Airports (2010) by The Black Dog, Resident Advisor. www.residentadvisor.net/
review-view.aspx?id=7404; Robin Jahdi, review of Music for Real Airports (2010) by The Black Dog, FACT.
305
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
306 Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports
Figure 1 (Colour online) The Black Dog’s Music for Real Airports (2010). Thanks to Martin Dust for
permission to reproduce this image.
Despite its title, The Black Dog did not wish Music for Real Airports to be played at
or in actual airports. As album promotions asserted, ‘This record is not a utilitarian
accompaniment to airports, in the sense of reinforcing the false utopia and fake idealism
of air travel’.5 Rather than romanticize the flight experience (something commercial airlines
and airports do enough in selling their services, the group says), Real Airports coldly reflects
upon the calculative control and bureaucratic management airports impose on their public.
As one member put it, the group wanted to ‘create a really intense, enjoyable experience that
reminds people of how they’re actually being treated and what they are being subjected to,
and paying for’.6 The track titles accordingly paint the album’s progression from arrival to
www.factmag.com/2010/07/14/the-black-dog-music-for-real-airports/; Colin McKean, review of Music for Real
Airports (2010) by The Black Dog, The Quietus. http://thequietus.com/articles/04326-the-black-dog-music-forreal-airports-album-review.
5 The Black Dog, ‘Music for Airports – Please Wait Here’, Internet Archive. http://web.archive.org/web/201301
21072521/www.musicforrealairports.com/live/index.php.
6 The Black Dog and Human, ‘Music for Real Airports’, 58.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports 307
departure as a trudge through some of the least appealing, yet common fixtures of airport
experience, from information desks to passport control, strip lighting to sleep deprivation,
security lines to flight delays. The album’s successively apprehensive, nervy, tense, and weary
electronica delivers as disenchanting and dispiriting an experience as airports provide at their
antiseptic, authoritarian worst.
Take how ‘Empty Seat Calculations’, like most tracks on the album, slowly transitions
from one form of unpleasantness to another; here out of the plodding synth-string dirge
of ‘Wait Behind this Line’ into the sizzling granular techno of ‘Strip Light Hate’. The track
begins shortly after the A♭5 drone in ‘Wait’ moves a step up to B♭m11; staticky percussion
enters soon after, scraping along at a slightly slower 55 bpm. The B♭m11 drone builds in
volume, tentatively, almost imperceptibly, for nearly two minutes. Finally the strings swell
expectantly into a brief, hopeful G♭sus4 – only to return, deflated, back to the B♭m11. The
treble percussion then launches into a double-time diminution, joined by a syncopated halftime heartbeat-kick, as the front-loaded Aeolian pendulum continues, with embellishment,
in the bass.7 The trepid, gritted-teeth percussion break that ends the track only seems an
appropriate anticipation of the fizzy, laser-streaked aural patdown of ‘Strip Light Hate’. Any
hint of hope once audible in the affectively pregnant beginning of ‘Calculations’ has by now
buckled to the authority of the album’s forward march into anxious pressure.
Other lowlights include ‘Passport Control’, in which a lone, sad tom plods through a hollow
Fm7 choral patch as laser-high Bs sear the track’s overhead; and ‘Sleep Deprivation 1’, wherein
jarred kick-drum heartbeats flutter starkly atop a dial tone, and children’s incomprehensible
whines bounce off cold tile. The band’s description of airports in the album’s promotions
could just as well apply to the frazzled Ambient techno it advertises: ‘Airports promise travel,
exploration and excitement but endlessly break that promise with their stale, tedious pressure.
They are intense and overwhelming environments.’8 No wonder when asked whether the
album was made for listening in airports, Ken Downie half jokingly answered, ‘Being in an
airport is bad enough. Listening to Music for Real Airports in a real airport would make me
want to punch somebody.’9
While calling the album ‘for real airports’ partly reflects this facetious attitude, the title’s
wording chiefly refers – probably obviously to anyone acquainted with the Ambient genre of
music – to Brian Eno’s Ambient 1: Music for Airports (Editions E. G., 1978).10 Although Discreet
7 The term ‘Aeolian pendulum’, which I discuss in the following section, comes from Alf Björnberg, ‘On Aeolian
Harmony in Contemporary Popular Music’, trans. Philip Tagg (Department of Musicology, University of Göteborg,
1984). www.tagg.org/others/othxpdfs/bjbgeol.pdf.
8 The Black Dog, ‘Music for Airports – Please Wait Here’.
9 Chris Hobson, ‘Music by Real People for Real People (in Real Airports)’, MNML SSGS. http://mnmlssg.
blogspot.com/2010/06/music-by-real-people-for-real-people-in.html.
10 Here, as throughout this article, I use the proper adjective ‘Ambient’ to denote a genre of music, and the common
‘ambient’ to denote the reception condition of music played or heard as atmosphere. References to Eno’s Ambient
record series are italicized. Eno’s Ambient records are not limited to those in the Ambient series.
It should also be noted that Music for Real Airports was not the first album of The Black Dog’s to refer to Eno’s
Ambient work; in 1996, Ken Downie as The Black Dog released Music for Adverts (and Short Films) in a cheeky (and
less conceptually motivated) reference to Eno’s 1976 album Music for Short Films.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
308 Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports
Music (Obscure, 1975), by Eno’s own account, was the artist’s first solo Ambient album, many
now consider Music for Airports an equally important watershed in the development of the
genre. Not only did the album kick off a four-part series of Ambient LPs (1978–82) in which
Eno and collaborators sketched out several forms that Ambient music might take, but it
also included in the liner notes Eno’s now-famous ‘Ambient Music’ essay coining the new
term.11 Ambient music, it pronounced, would be music made for use as ‘an atmosphere, or
a surrounding influence: a tint’.12
As Eno has told it, the inspiration for the album arose during a stop at Flughafen Köln/Bonn
(the Cologne/Bonn Airport) on a clear, sunny Sunday morning in late 1977:
The light was beautiful; everything was beautiful, except they were playing awful
music. And I thought, there’s something completely wrong that people don’t think
about the music that goes into situations like this. You know, they spend hundreds of
millions of pounds on the architecture, on everything, except the music. The music
comes down to someone bringing in a tape of their favourite songs this week, and
sticking them in, and the whole airport is filled with this sound. So, I thought, it
would be interesting to start writing music for public spaces like that.13
Over the next several months, Eno produced four tape-loop-based tracks as solutions
for what he perceived to be a naı̈ve or thoughtless approach to music in airports. As Eno
asserted in the liner notes, these tracks would be aesthetically different from ‘conventional
background music’ and ‘canned music’ such as Muzak’s symphonic pop arrangements.14
Rather than merely ‘adding stimulus’ to the environment, Ambient music should ‘induce
calm and a space to think’. ‘Ambient music’, the essay concludes, ‘must be able to accommodate
many levels of listening attention without enforcing one in particular; it must be as ignorable
as it is interesting’.15
The Black Dog has described Real Airports as a riposte to Eno’s famous project: ‘Unlike
Eno’s Music for Airports, this is not a record to be used by airport authorities to lull their
11 Major collaborators included minimalist composer-performers Harold Budd (Ambient 2: The Plateaux of Mirror
(1980)) and Laraaji (Ambient 3: Day of Radiance (1980)), while various other performers and producers assisted
with the recordings on Eno’s Ambient 1: Music for Airports (1978) and Ambient 4: On Land (1982).
12 Brian Eno, ‘Ambient Music’, liner notes to Ambient 1: Music for Airports, Editions E. G., AMB 001, LP, 1978.
13 Brian Eno, ‘Opening Holland Festival’, interview by Martin Large, NOS (Netherlands Broadcasting Foundation), 5
June 1999, TV. Because of the date of this interview, it is unclear whether Eno’s characterization of airport music as a
tape of someone’s ‘favourite songs’ captures what he heard on that date in 1977, or what he was commonly hearing
in 1999.
14 On the history of Muzak, see Stephen H. Barnes, Muzak: The Hidden Messages in Music. Vol. 9: Studies on the
History and Interpretation of Music (Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1988); Jerri Ann Husch, ‘Music of the
Workplace: A Study of Muzak Culture’ (PhD diss., University of Massachusetts, 1984); Simon C. Jones and Thomas
G. Schumacher, ‘Muzak: On Functional Music and Power’, Critical Studies in Mass Communication 9/2 (June 1992);
Joseph Lanza, Elevator Music: A Surreal History of Muzak, Easy-Listening, and Other Moodsong (New York: Picador,
1995); Hervé Vanel, Triple Entendre: Furniture Music, Muzak, Muzak-Plus (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press,
2013), 46–83.
15 Brian Eno, ‘Ambient Music’.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports 309
customers.’16 The group’s provocation serves as a foil for my analysis and interpretation
of Eno’s landmark album, since their charge illuminates some common misapprehensions
regarding the modes of application and aesthetic significance of Ambient music records
such as Airports. Such misapprehensions are understandable, since the comparison between
Ambient music and Muzak was initially made by none other than Eno himself – and on
an album titled Music for Airports, no less. The comparison between Airports and Muzak,
however, is just as misleading as the album title when it comes to understanding Ambient
music’s import as a present-day genre of popular music. For although Airports appears to
have been made for public administration in actual airports – as Eno originally conceived
it – it landed far more influentially in the hands and ears of thousands of music consumers
as a commercial recording. Ambient music’s present significance as a genre is accordingly
best understood not within the reception context of public administration, but rather in
relation to personal practices of recorded music programming and listening. Eno’s general
claim to Ambient music’s superiority over Muzak, much like Music for Airports’s site-specific
title, obscures Ambient music’s most salient meanings and functions within this reception
context.
This article positions Eno’s Music for Airports as a point of departure for understanding the
organizing role of the Ambient genre, and the place of its commercial recordings, within the
sphere of everyday record consumption. An analysis of Airports’s conceptual, musical, and
visual design clarifies this role by showing how Eno’s album, like The Black Dog’s, preserves
uncertainties and anxieties that pervade the experience of air travel. As Eno once attested,
Airports needed to reflect the fact that travelling by plane always carries an element of ‘flirting
with death’.17 In illustrating the ways in which Airports subtly and ambivalently retains this
sense of danger, and by relating this expressive import to those of later Ambient albums such
as The Black Dog’s Real Airports, this analysis demonstrates how Eno’s Airports established
certain thematic and affective coordinates that surveyed Ambient music’s later expansion
as a genre. Ambient music, I argue, often followed Airports’s lead by providing consumers
what media scholar Paul Roquet calls ‘ambivalent calm’, a ‘form of provisional comfort that
nonetheless registers the presence of external threats’.18
I conclude with the observation that Ambient music’s unsettling atmospheric designs may
be understood as both anticipations of, and metaphors for, the transportive role of recorded
music within the everyday ecology of personal audio consumption. Within this ecology,
recorded music virtually conveys senses of place while also ‘taking place’ in actual spaces,
motivating ‘a continuous cycle of displacement and re-placement’ that consumers selectively
issue and navigate.19 As an organizing force within this ecology, the Ambient category is not
16
17
18
19
The Black Dog, ‘Music for Airports – Please Wait Here’.
Brian Eno, A Year with Swollen Appendices (London: Faber & Faber, 1996), 295.
Paul Roquet, Ambient Media: Japanese Atmospheres of Self (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016), 18.
Holly Watkins, ‘Musical Ecologies of Place and Placelessness’, Journal of the American Musicological Society 64/2
(Summer 2011), 405, 408.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
310 Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports
and never was, as Thom Holmes describes it, ‘a blank canvas’,20 nor have its possibilities
ever been, as Mark Prendergast claims, ‘endless’.21 Rather, the genre since Eno’s Airports has
expanded upon the album’s distinct expressive design and concept by indexing its producers’
and consumers’ ambivalence towards the technological mediation of space and movement –
a phenomenon that includes recorded music programming. Ambient music’s aesthetic and
cultural significance, from this perspective, has less to do with improving upon ‘conventional’
background music, and more to do with the ways it expressively addresses its own place in
our increasingly pre-programmed world.
Airports’s certain uncertainties and uncertain certainty
One can easily imagine how the gently paced and smoothly consistent recordings on Eno’s
Airports might be heard as lulling from a critical perspective such as The Black Dog’s. Each
track establishes early on an invariant instrumentation and texture, as well as a contained
repertory of pitches, gestural shapes, and motivic content that lasts throughout its entirety.
Each recording also sits within a narrow dynamic range and avoids timbral distortion. In
these ways, the atmospheres on Music for Airports can quickly instill certainty about how
they will continue to sound throughout, and can seem unchallenging for this reason. Perhaps
because of these consistencies, many of Music for Airports’s early reviewers derided the album
as bland. Rolling Stone’s Michael Bloom called the album ‘unfocused . . . aesthetic white
noise’, while New York Times’s Ken Emerson quipped that its ‘hues are as faint as the flavor
of those Japanese teas so delicate you’re never quite sure you aren’t just simply sipping hot
water’.22 NME’s Lynden Barber later suggested that the ‘simply ignorable’ album’s ‘white-tiled
atmosphere’ could have earned it the title ‘Music for Toilets’; and Robert Christgau registered
it, pointedly, ‘a bore’.23 Still, for purposes of environmental music design in public spaces,
such ‘boring’ consistencies make sense, as they would allow passers-by to enter and exit the
field of sound without leaving them feeling like they missed out on anything. The music’s
unobtrusive and predictable features would also assure airport auditors that the music will
continue similarly, thereby facilitating their attentional freedom.
Yet The Black Dog may have had a point – feelings of assurance are precisely what market
researchers in the 1950s and 1960s found to be conducive to consumer purchasing of services
and goods in commercial spaces.24 Public music programming of the time largely proffered
consumers this sense of security through the familiarity of well-known popular songs, which
20 Thom Holmes, Electronic and Experimental Music: Technology, Music, and Culture, 3rd edn (New York: Routledge,
2008), 402.
21 Mark Prendergast, The Ambient Century: From Mahler to Trance: The Evolution of Sound in the Electronic Age (New
York: Bloomsbury USA, 2000), 4.
22 Michael Bloom, ‘Ambient 1: Music for Airports’, Rolling Stone, 26 July 1979, 80; Ken Emerson, ‘Brian Eno Slips into
“Trance Music”’, New York Times, 12 August 1979, D22.
23 Lynden Barber, ‘Atmospheres in the Home’, Hyperreal Archives. http://music.hyperreal.org/artists/brian˙eno/
interviews/rvonland.html; Robert Christgau, ‘Brian Eno: On Land’, Village Voice, 31 August 1982.
24 Robert Fink, Repeating Ourselves: American Minimal Music as Cultural Practice (Berkeley: University of California
Press, 2005), 78; Adrian C. North and David J. Hargreaves, ‘Music in Business Environments’, in Music and
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports 311
signalled that the listener was ‘at home’ in public spaces of commerce.25 Today, following the
diversification of publicly programmed music during the 1970s and 1980s, familiar-sounding
music in commercial spaces works to foster a social sort of security by marking out areas
where consumers may find their identities recognized and affirmed.26 By contrast, while
Music for Airports too works to soothe (and perhaps even ‘lull’) its listeners, it accomplishes
this differently from most publicly programmed music – not so much by sounding familiar
as by reliably serving as a consistent feature of one’s auditory environment.
However, despite Music for Airports’s recordings being remarkable consistency over time,
various listener accounts give reason to question the extent to which Eno’s album ameliorates
anxiety, and proffers a sense of security, within real airports. When Eno’s music was first
installed at New York’s LaGuardia Airport in 1980, some airport workers and travellers
reportedly complained that the music induced unease.27 As one remarked, ‘It sounds like
funeral music’.28 The album’s later installation in Pittsburgh International Airport allegedly
garnered requests for the usual background music to be restored.29 And if that weren’t
enough, in 1984 the music sparked protest from employees at Berlin’s Tegel Airport who
were annoyed by the acoustic ‘interference’.30
How are these decidedly agitated reactions to be explained? A closer examination of
Music for Airports’s four recordings provides some clues. While these tracks promote an
overarching sense of stability by constraining the parameters of global, or long-term change,
a number of local, or short-term variabilities keep the music from resting on certain ground.
Although the sounds used in each recording remain within a single modal pitch collection,
the irregular, seemingly unmotivated oscillations between major and minor sonorities within
each collection lend the music an emotional mercuriality. And although the non-periodicity
of repeated sonic iterations relieves listeners of expecting their metric placement, these sound
events also overlap indiscriminately, and dissipate into indefinitely long echoes, creating a
bounty of micro-variations in timing and timbre. Within the tracks’ overall stable texture,
such irregularities generate just enough light turbulence to keep those on board with the
music from nodding off. Though seemingly weightless and placid at a distance, the music
remains astir and amiss, possibly fostering an uncanny sense that the music’s stability is a
ruse.
25
26
27
28
29
30
Manipulation: On the Social Uses and Social Control of Music, ed. Steven Brown and Ulrik Volgsten (New York:
Berghahn Books, 2006), 107–9.
Ronald M. Radano, ‘Interpreting Muzak: Speculations on Musical Experience in Everyday Life’, American Music 7/4
(Winter 1989), 456.
Tia DeNora, Music in Everyday Life (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 109; Jonathan Sterne, ‘Sounds
like the Mall of America: Programmed Music and the Architectonics of Commercial Space’, Ethnomusicology 41/1
(Winter 1997), 29.
David Sheppard, On Some Faraway Beach: The Life and Times of Brian Eno (Chicago: Chicago Review Press, 2009),
279.
George Rush, ‘Brian Eno: Rock’s Svengali Pursues Silence’, Esquire, December 1982.
Lanza, Elevator Music, 198.
Ursula Frohne, ‘Brian Eno: Tegel Airport, Institute Unzeit, Berlin’, FlashArt, May 1984, 43.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
312 Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports
Example 1 Transcription of ‘2/1’ (0:00–1:40). Open noteheads indicate the notes’ initiations; closed
noteheads indicate the notes’ endings; the bars in between indicate the length of the notes’ sustains. Open
noteheads in parentheses indicate overtones or ‘ghost’ notes; dotted lines indicate the length of the notes’
sustain.
Of all the Airports recordings, the ghostly ‘2/1’ probably contributed most to the discomfort
expressed by airport workers and patrons (Example 1). For this track, Eno recorded onto tape
three women singing ‘ah’, unison and non-vibrato, within an F Aeolian pitch collection. Eno
treated each of these tones with reverb and synthesizer, then separated them into different
tape segments, with long gaps of silent tape about twice the length of each pitch following
the end of each note. The final recording is almost entirely automated, with eight total tape
segments of uncannily lifeless vocals looping simultaneously.31 Due to the loops’ irregular,
uneven lengths, the voices overlap in slightly different configurations over the course of the
31 I say ‘almost entirely’ due to Eno’s editing in post-production. In addition to the added effects (slow decays, reverb),
he occasionally enhances overtones (often an octave above the F3 or A♭3), and drops notes (e.g., the C5 that
should sound around 2:55). As Eno commented in one interview, with reference to strict ‘systems’ or process-based
experimental composition: ‘A lot of the so-called systems composers have this thing that the system is always right.
You don’t fiddle with it at all. Well, I don’t think that . . . If for some reason you don’t like a bit of it you must trust
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports 313
Table 1 Approximate length of each voice loop in ‘2/1’.
f
a♭
c1
d♭1
e♭1
f1
a♭1
c2
24½˝
21˝
20˝
31½˝
16½˝
19˝
18˝
31˝
piece. (Table 1 shows the approximate length of each loop.) At times, this results in lengthy
silences arising unpredictably (and somewhat mournfully) between sounding patches of
voice; the durations of sounding material in the first two minutes, for example, proceed
as follows: 13˝–25˝–31˝–5˝–12˝–37˝. The pitch content also gives reason for the ‘funereal’
associations of one airport listener; while the overall composition mainly tends towards
F Aeolian due to the bass f notes, the occasional appearance of the d♭1 implies a major
subtonic triad or seventh chord (VI or VI7 ) before proceeding back to an implied tonic (e.g.,
0:48; 1:20). This i–VI Aeolian pendulum, as Philip Tagg has found, is often associated with
ominousness, resignation, or death in much European and American music (for instance,
an Aeolian pendulum famously starts Chopin’s Marche funèbre).32 Scott Murphy has more
recently illustrated a corollary to Tagg’s finding, as he has found the mirror-image triadic
pairing of I–iii frequently accompanying scenes of loss or grief in film and television scores;
this pairing might be observed in ‘2/1’ in the slow reversions from D♭ major back to F
minor, with D♭ acting as a temporary tonic.33 Through such compositional techniques and
affective-expressive codes, ‘2/1’ intimates human absence more overtly than any other track
on Music for Airports.
In all the tracks on Airports, added sixths, sevenths, ninths, and elevenths above the bass
also create mild harmonic dissonance and melodic irresolution, leading to an overarching soft
sense of tension. Take ‘1/1’, for instance, a track largely constructed through the recurring use
of two similar-sounding melodic themes in D Mixolydian (marked T1 and T2 in Example 2).
Both themes melodically elaborate a D major triad, with non-harmonic tones G and E
operating as incomplete neighbours or passing tones. These melodic lines alternate with
shorter melodic fragments and chords that utilize the g1 eleventh above the D bass. While the
use of g1 , in these instances, does not necessarily call for a resolution to the third below (f#1 ),
it does not necessarily persist independently of its potential to resolve downward either, due
to its proximity and similarity to the more ‘classically’ resolving T1 and T2. For this reason,
when the g1 does appear outside the context of the theme, as it does at 1:45, and between
your intuition on that. I don’t take a doctrinaire approach to systems.’ Glenn O’Brien, ‘Eno at the Edge of Rock’,
Interview, June 1978, 31.
32 Philip Tagg, ‘“Universal” Music and the Case of Death’, Critical Quarterly 35/2 (1993). Tagg borrowed the term
‘Aeolian pendulum’ from Björnberg, ‘On Aeolian Harmony in Contemporary Popular Music’.
33 Scott Murphy, ‘Scoring Loss in Some Recent Popular Film and Television’, Music Theory Spectrum 36/2 (2014).
Murphy gives some explanation for why I–vi does not carry similar associations, but barely comments on the more
closely related i–VI.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
314 Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports
Example 2
Reduction of ‘1/1’ (1:30–2:30).
Example 3
Pitch repertories used on Music for Airports.
2:00 and 2:15, it can seem expectant and unresolved, even without necessarily calling for a
‘proper’ contrapuntal resolution.
Such moments of irresolution as these may register more strongly with listeners who
otherwise expect more security in their environmental music. These listeners might find, as
mood music aficionado Joseph Lanza describes it, that Eno’s Ambient music produces ‘a kind
of sonic ambivalence that encourages grave contemplation of feelings of impending doom
. . . Behind all of Eno’s cold, metallic engineering is a frightening and moody world that is
anything but emotionally neutral.’34 Lanza’s intense descriptions of Eno’s music, along with
the comments of the airport listeners, contrast starkly with the unimpressed assessments
of The Black Dog and Music for Airports’s reviewers. While the latter hear Eno’s album as
neutrally utilitarian to the point of total blandness, the former are palpably discomfited by
Eno’s ambiences. Are they really all talking about the same music?
One possibility is that, simply, no – they are not talking about the same music exactly, but
rather responding chiefly to different tracks, and taking their particular global affects to be
representative of the whole album. Tracks ‘1/1’ and ‘2/2’ imply global D Mixolydian and A
Ionian modal areas, respectively, while tracks ‘2/1’ and ‘1/2’ globally imply the more dour
F Aeolian modal area (Example 3). Each track also enjoys different combinations of timbral
characteristics (Table 2). Generally, the combination in ‘1/1’ and ‘2/2’ of more uplifting global
34 Lanza, Elevator Music, 196.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports 315
Table 2 Timbral characteristics of Music for
Airports’s recordings.35
‘1/1’
‘2/1’
‘1/2’
‘2/2’
Temperature
Luminance
Warm & Cold
Cold
Cold
Warm
Bright
Dark
Bright & Dark
Dark
modes with warmer timbres can seem more inviting than the glummer global modes and
cold, dark timbres of ‘2/1’ and ‘1/2’.
Given their drastically divergent criticisms, Airports’s various naysayers probably found
different aspects of the music undesirable against different backdrops of expectation. To a
rock critic or countercultural musician, Music for Airports might offend with its generally
dispassionate pleasantness and overarching predictability, while failing to generate interest for
those features that undercut these auras of certainty. By contrast, for the average light-music
enthusiast or Top 40 listener in expectation of the extraverted, peppy, or familiar, Airports
might come off as icy, eerie, or depressed. Either way, for the album’s critics, the most salient
aspects of Airports’s ambivalent moods appear to counteract the moods they would prefer to
sustain – whether from antagonistic to complacent, or from assured to uncertain.
Ambivalent ambience
In perhaps the most overlooked sentence of his ‘Ambient Music’ essay, Eno identifies
ambivalence as essential to Ambient music: ‘Whereas conventional background music is
produced by stripping away all sense of doubt and uncertainty (and thus all genuine interest)
from the music, Ambient Music retains these qualities.’36 Eno’s description reveals, perhaps
more than anything else in the essay, the sort of ‘interest’ he had in mind with the phrase ‘as
ignorable as it is interesting’. It is also, perhaps, the essay’s vaguest claim. Just what would it
mean for a type of music to ‘retain’ a ‘sense of doubt and uncertainty’ – retain from what,
and doubt about what? How would it convey this sense of doubt? And what makes doubt
and uncertainty more ‘genuinely interesting’ than their absence, anyway?
On one level, ‘doubt and uncertainty’ seem to describe the sorts of feelings Ambient
music should elicit in the listener. On another, they seem to point to something inherent to
the recorded ‘production’. Eno has described his compositional activity in the studio as an
35 My determination of timbral characteristics is based on the tracks’ spectral frequency distribution. My use of
‘temperature’ and ‘luminance’ as axes of description are extrapolated from R. L. Pratt and P. E. Doak, ‘A Subjective
Rating Scale for Timbre’, Journal of Sound and Vibration 45/3 (1976). I do not include these authors’ third axis of
timbral description, wealth (described in terms of ‘purity’ versus ‘richness’), since this would be irrelevant to the
discussion at hand.
36 Eno, ‘Ambient Music’.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
316 Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports
experimental process of linking the two by discovering musical textures that bring out in
the listener a predetermined mood or feeling.37 ‘A composer, or any artist really, is a kind of
curator of feelings’, Eno once stated.38 The connection between musical texture and mood,
however, might seem too mysterious or subjective to substantively qualify. Possibly due to
this seeming vagueness, critics and scholars writing about Ambient music have often passed
over this distinction, focusing on chewier concepts such as attentional variability.39 But what
would it look like to more deeply investigate Eno’s claim that Ambient music evokes doubt
and uncertainty?
One could start with doubt and uncertainty themselves. Commonly, doubt and uncertainty
are delivered to experience as emotions rather than moods. As Noël Carroll explains the
difference, emotions are phenomenologically intentional, or ‘about’ particular objects or
scenarios, whereas moods are objectless affective frames through which cognition and
emotion operate.40 Doubt and uncertainty, as emotions, combine cognitive assurance about
a stated, expected, or ideal state of affairs with scepticism, distrust, anxiety, or fear that the
real state of affairs does not match this ideal. Doubt gets sparked when something seems
‘off’ about the thing or state of affairs at hand, and yet the cause for suspicion cannot be
detected or confirmed. Within the affective space of doubt lies a gap between what is expected
and what is given, a gap that cannot be totally bridged through observation. In short, doubt
involves the perception of a false or illusory appearance of stability in some statement, thing,
or state of affairs.
A musical evocation of doubt, then, might either indicate some sort of musicorepresentational or lyrical ‘object’ or state of affairs about which it conveys uncertainty,
or it might capture the affective shape or gist of uncertainty without any referent. To do
the latter, it seems that the music would have to convey stability or assurance, while at
the same time hinting that this assurance might be a false pretence. As the earlier analyses
indicate, Airports’s recordings do just this by establishing a global sense of stability (through
use of a limited range of melodic gestures, a narrow dynamic range, etc.), while remaining
inconstant on the local level (through unpredictable entrances, shifts in colour, changes in
harmonic quality, and so on). The album’s recorded design, in this sense, establishes ‘constant
inconstancy’ of musical texture as a quintessentially Ambient mode of setting a doubtful or
uncertain mood.41
But what makes doubt and uncertainty more ‘genuinely interesting’ than their absence,
anyway? One might chalk this up to the composer’s personal preference, as Eno has admitted
37 Lee Moore, ‘Eno = MC Squared’, Creem, November 1978, 67; O’Brien, ‘Eno at the Edge of Rock’, 31.
38 Robert Palmer, ‘Brian Eno, New Guru of Rock, Going Solo’, New York Times, 13 March 1981, C17.
39 See, for instance, Timothy Morton, Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics (Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press, 2007), 153–4; Mark Richardson, ‘As Ignorable As It Is Interesting: The Ambient Music of
Brian Eno’, Pitchfork Media. http://pitchfork.com/features/resonant-frequency/5879-resonant-frequency-17/.
40 Noël Carroll, ‘Art and Mood: Preliminary Notes and Conjectures’, The Monist 86/4 (2003), 526–30.
41 For more on the musical conveyance of mood, see Eldritch Priest, ‘Felt as Thought (or, Music Abstraction and the
Semblance of Affect)’, in Sound, Music, Affect: Theorizing Sonic Experience, ed. Marie Thompson and Ian Biddle
(New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013).
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports 317
on a number of occasions his predilection for affectively ambiguous art experiences, especially
those tinged with melancholy.42 Any departure from certainty, he mused in one interview,
calls ‘partly for celebration and partly for melancholy. It’s both exciting and unnerving.’43 Yet
Eno has also proposed that art creates a ‘safe space’ for both artists and audiences to deal with
disorientation. ‘Good art’, Eno summarizes, ‘forces people to either accept disorientation or
to retreat. If they retreat from life as they do from art, they eventually come to live in the
past.’44
Airports’s recordings, by establishing invariant parameters, produce across time ‘safe’ zones
wherein listeners might accept their more disorienting contingencies.45 The ambivalent
moods resulting from this mixture may be helpfully contrasted with those arising from
publicly programmed musics such as Muzak or ‘foreground music’, which, as mentioned
earlier, aim to mitigate anxiety by enhancing the familiarity of listeners’ surroundings.46
These forms of publicly programmed music accomplish this sense of familiarity through pop
songs and styles that represent a shared Anglo-American history, and that work to conjure a
sense of domestic well-being.47 The less assured moods of Ambient music, by contrast, reject
these idealizations of pop-culture comfort, while yet accommodating inhabitants with their
overarching unobtrusiveness. Such moods might even bring comfort to audiences who find
themselves more irritated than eased by Muzak’s or foreground music’s claim to consensus.
Since Airports’s release, Eno has observed affective ambivalence or mixture as a constant
across his oeuvre of solo recordings:
I suppose that one of the things I was often doing in music was trying to recreate that
sense of being wide-eyed in a surrounding that was both familiar and new, where
there was just enough unknown to stay alert, the consciousness of the passage of
time and change. These feelings are always going to be joyous and regretful at the
same time: but for me the interesting feelings are complicated ones, blends of bitter
and sweet, of familiar and strange, new and old.48
The complicated moods Eno describes here expand upon his original conception of
Ambient uncertainty in terms of affective mixture. Eno’s production design aids in this
affective complication; while emotionally poignant and lovingly crafted, Eno’s productions
42 Lester Bangs, ‘Eno’, Musician, Player & Listener, November 1979, 39; Stephen Demorest, ‘The Discreet Charm of
Brian Eno: An English Pop Theorist Seeks to Redefine Music’, Horizon, June 1978, 85; Ian MacDonald, ‘Another
False World: Part 2: How to Make a Modern Record’, New Musical Express, 3 December 1977, 33.
43 MacDonald, ‘Another False World’, 34.
44 Frank Rose, ‘Four Conversations with Brian Eno’, The Village Voice, 28 March 1977, 69.
45 Paul Roquet writes similarly of ‘ambient video’ as ‘providing immersive spaces of contained and “safe” complexity’;
see Roquet, Ambient Media, 115.
46 Foreground music is the industry term for songs with vocals, performed by original recording artists, programmed
as atmosphere in businesses. See Jones and Schumacher, ‘Muzak’, 162–5; Anahid Kassabian, Ubiquitous Listening:
Affect, Attention, and Distributed Subjectivity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013), 1–9 and 84–108; Sterne,
‘Sounds like the Mall of America’.
47 Radano, ‘Interpreting Muzak’, 454–6.
48 Sheppard, On Some Faraway Beach, 357.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
318 Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports
can also come off as distant, synthetic, only indirectly compassionate. (As Frank Rose put it
presciently in 1977, Eno’s music ‘reflects warmth but does not seem to generate it’.49 ) In many
ways, Eno’s blended moods set the tone for the genre’s development over the next several
decades into a less rosy alternative to New Age’s more straightforward uplift.50 During the
early 1990s, to give just one example, proponents of ‘ambient house’ such as The Orb’s Alex
Paterson and Spacetime Continuum’s Jonah Sharp used the term ‘Ambient’ to distinguish
their more ‘left-field’ chill out music from New Age.51 To this day, Ambient music more often
than not delivers technologized sounds to unpredictable mixtures of serenity and loneliness
and wakefulness and wistfulness, sponsoring detachment while triggering melancholy, and
vacillating unpredictably between shades of feeling.
You are now going to sit in space: interpreting Airports
In a 1999 interview, Eno amusingly explained why maintaining a musical sense of uncertainty
would be desirable in the context of air travel:
When you went into an airport, or an airplane, they always played this very happy
music, which is sort of saying, ‘You’re not going to die! There’s not going to be
an accident! Don’t worry!’ And I thought that was really the wrong way around. I
thought that it would be much better to have music that said, ‘Well, if you die, it
doesn’t really matter’. You know? And so I wanted to create a different feeling that you
were sort of suspended in the universe, and your life or death wasn’t so important.
So, rather than trivialize the thing, I wanted to take it seriously: the possibility that
you were actually, now, going to sit in space. Which is what you do when you travel
on an airplane.52
As Eno conceived it, Airports should enable nothing less than an existential epiphany for
the anxious air traveller. Rather than distracting or shielding listeners from their anxiety
(the standard approach to airport music, according to Eno), Airports maintains the tension
inherent to the prospect of flying, while yet diminishing the stakes at doubt. Rather than
dispelling irresolution, Eno’s recordings perpetuate and contextualize irresolution within
a broader stability that renders the unknown ‘not so important’ in the grand scheme.
The unpredictable soundings and silences on Airports’s recordings leave unknown listeners’
49 Rose, ‘Four Conversations with Brian Eno’, 72.
50 The complicated and ever-shifting dynamic between the overlapping ‘Ambient’ and ‘New Age’ genres of atmospheric
music cannot be fully accounted for here. For purposes of this article, it is worth noting that Eno has
dismissed New Age music as an ‘over-simplification’ of life as it is lived; see Andy Gill, ‘Brian Eno: Towards an
Understanding of Pop Past and Present’, Q, November 1993. www.rocksbackpages.com/Library/Article/brian-enotowards-an-understanding-of-pop-past-and-present. So has Ambient series composer Harold Budd; see Holmes,
Electronic and Experimental Music, 401.
51 Matt Anniss, ‘Ambient House: The Story of Chill Out Music, 1988–95’, Red Bull Music Academy, 17 February 2016.
http://daily.redbullmusicacademy.com/specials/2016-ambient-house-feature/; Jack Barrow, ‘The Orb’, booklet notes
to Trance Europe Express by various artists, CD, Total Record Co. via BMG (UK) Ltd., TEEX 1, 1993, 120–1.
52 Eno, ‘Opening Holland Festival’.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports 319
immediate futures – a state not unlike the prospect of flight delays, lost baggage, and plane
crashes, but one certainly less consequential. The global stabilities couching this constant
transience delineate a frictionless musical world wherein inhabitants may become accustomed
to consistent, low-stakes irresolution.
For Eno, musically preserving a modicum of uncertainty was a way of ‘taking seriously’
the existential suspension and loss of control both intensified and literalized by air travel.
Yet for this reason, Music for Airports cannot be thought of as strictly utilitarian – a
metaphorical suggestiveness about the reality of air travel, however idealized, persists
throughout. Christopher Schaberg, along these lines, contends that Eno’s airport installations
sparked protest because they ‘enhanced the peculiar feel of airport life: being in between’.53 The
music, in generating localized rhythmic and tonal tensions within a static global framework,
paradoxically conveys both movement and hesitation, and in doing so evokes what Schaberg
calls the ‘elimination of speed’ produced by airports, where one travels ‘even when standing
in barely moving lines, or waiting for baggage to appear’.54 Airplanes similarly suspend
passengers’ physical agency, even as they move these passengers over great distances, at great
speeds. Much like airplane passengers, the sounds of Eno’s album seem inert while being yet
carried along, both suspended and adrift, neither at home nor at their destination, but sitting
in space somewhere between.
In addition to its mixtures of stability and irresolution, Airports evokes a sense of airport
space by conveying an impersonal, functionalist distance from human affairs.55 It relates
this distance in a number of ways. For one, the incidental interactions of sound events on
its recordings replicate the transient sociality of airport travellers. Whereas the sounds of
‘conventional’ publicly programmed music normally consort cooperatively in homophonic
textures and commonly held meter, the motives and pitches of Airports loop independently
of one another, a loose aggregate rather than unified assembly of sound events. Second,
while most publicly programmed music stages its familiarity via popular song forms and
tunes, Airports’s recordings avoid such external referentiality, instead remaining internally
consistent through commonalities of musical material (pitch repertory, amplitude range, etc.)
and of technological origin (sequence lengths, looping system, synthesizer, etc.). And third,
whereas most musical programming in the English-speaking world relies upon conventional
pop orchestral or R&B/rock instrumentation, Airports’s electronic timbres defamiliarize the
pop orchestra. Whether sterilized by the synthesizer, or clouded and delicately mixed in
post-production, its sounds exercise an alien, uncanny mimesis of Western instruments and
natural voices.56 These elements place Airports at a windowed remove from Western music’s
most familiar musical conventions, supplanting this familiarity with the music’s smoothly
manufactured internal consistencies.
53 Christopher Schaberg, The Textual Life of Airports: Reading the Culture of Flight (New York: Continuum, 2012), 90.
54 Schaberg, The Textual Life of Airports, 102.
55 For a historical overview of functionalist aesthetics, see George H. Marcus, Functionalist Design: An Ongoing History
(Munich and New York: Prestel-Verlag, 1995).
56 Marc Augé, Non-Places: An Introduction to Supermodernity, 2nd edn, trans. John Howe (New York: Verso, 2008).
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
320 Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports
Eno’s design of the album’s front cover likewise conveys this sense of abstraction and
distance from the familiar world. The drawing depicts a magnified square section of a map
framing topographic regions and a river system, with one letter from the map intruding
upon the landscape. At the scale drawn, its beige, pale yellows, greenish browns, and light
blues recall the view of a landscape from an airplane window. Yet while replicating the
perspective of the airplane traveller hovering off the ground, the absence of colour gradation
and serifed ‘T’ reveal this perspective as that of a map viewer, and the ‘ground’ as human
artefact. The ambiguity of perspective enhances the sense of a map viewer’s dislocation from
authentic emplacement above the landscape, while the air traveller’s perspective too involves
an abstracting distance from earth. As when listening, Airports’s map viewers might imagine
or recall what it is like to travel by air – including the sense of disconnection from grounded
living air travel produces.
Through such conveyances of distance from both nature and human sociality, the
recordings of Music for Airports evoke something of what Marc Augé calls ‘non-place’: ‘A
world surrendered to solitary individuality, to the fleeting, temporary and ephemeral.’57
Functionalist architecture, vehicles of transport, and commercial venues comprise this
‘evacuated world’ of globalized circulation, consumption, and communication. The
transitory spaces of non-place, Augé explains, disperse the social relations or collective
histories that would otherwise be embedded in what he calls ‘anthropological place’.58 This
scattering or smudging of personal and collective pasts operates according to late capitalism’s
demand for abstraction and efficient transaction, and results in experiences of anonymity,
solitude, and empty passage throughout. Airports’s smooth, sterilized textures and distance
from conventional expressiveness promote the solitary experiences Augé describes.
Cecilia Sun, in a comparative analysis of Eno’s Airports with Bang on a Can’s live
arrangement, has likewise connected Eno’s Airports to Augé’s concept of non-place. My
understanding of Airports’s evocation of non-place differs from Sun’s, however. For Sun,
since non-places seem devoid of collective human significance, Music for Airports should
analogously be thought of as empty of meaning, a ‘non-piece’.59 She asserts, along these
lines, that Ambient music by definition ‘obviates questions of interpretation . . . it is
what it is’.60 Others have characterized Ambient music similarly; for instance, Eldritch
Priest calls Eno’s Ambient music one of only a few ‘un-thematic’ musical forms in the
Western world ‘that express only their own occurrence and do nothing but relay potential’.61
Such observations are understandable, since the generic name ‘Ambient’ appears neutrally
descriptive of the music’s atmospheric function, and thereby suggests an absence of expressive
or representational content. Yet while the genre label implies both value-neutrality and allpurpose functionality, the tendency to read Ambient music as semiotically vacuous and
value-neutral may be more inspired by the notion of a strictly functional musical technology
57
58
59
60
61
Augé, Non-Places, 64.
Augé, Non-Places, 102.
Cecilia Sun, ‘Resisting the Airport: Bang on a Can Performs Brian Eno’, Musicology Australia 29/1 (2007), 152.
Sun, ‘Resisting the Airport’, 136.
Priest, ‘Felt as Thought’, 53.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports 321
than reflective of Ambient music’s actual affective implications and investments. After all, as
various unsettled Airports listeners have suggested, the music’s ephemeral blankness is not
simply a neutral environmental frame or atmospheric tint; it is also expressively rich. Rather
than understanding Music for Airports’s evocation of non-place as obviating interpretation,
then, I read this evocation as precisely the music’s substance.
With this in mind, one may find that Eno’s album has more in common with Music for Real
Airports than The Black Dog purports. A comparison between Eno’s and The Black Dog’s
albums illuminates how different pieces of Ambient music script listening experience not due
to different utilitarian aims or reception locations, but rather according to the sorts of space
they aim to conjure, the sense of movement through space they evoke, and the moods they
bring to the journey. In The Black Dog’s Real Airports, rigid rhythmic repetitions, nervous
plodding, brittle percussion, and sprays of harsh high-frequency hiss palpably manifest the
anxieties of the passenger beholden to tedious bureaucracy and heightened airport security
throughout the experience of air travel. Such features of airport experience have progressively
intensified since the 1970s, especially following the events of 9/11. Listeners today may well
have reason to perceive Real Airports’s rattled anxiety and defeated exhaustion as more
‘real’ or experientially authentic than Eno’s subtle alienation, since calculative control is so
much more iconic of airport experience now than in the 1970s. As Peter Adey points out,
risk management has remained at the forefront of airport planning and design ever since
the eruption of international aviation terrorism.62 Post-1970s airport designs often openly,
blatantly reduce possibilities for movement in order to make inhabitants aware of the fact
that they are in a highly controlled environment, thereby ensuring compliance with airport
security.63 The oppressive moods invoked by these buildings, and The Black Dog’s album,
are hence likely more familiar to contemporary travellers than the elegant, staid openness of
older airports such as Flughafen Köln/Bonn.
As far as Eno’s architectural muse goes, such open-ended designs as the Cologne/Bonn
Airport exert what John Allen calls ‘ambient power’, a ‘soft’ power that works through
seduction rather than domination, and inclusion rather than exclusion.64 Conveying an aura
of detachment through visual transparency and spatial accessibility, such spaces appear to
offer many choices for movement while being yet limited in broadly scripted ways.65 Music for
Airports works similarly. Its recordings’ sparse, minimalist textures, long silences, and heavy
reverb convey spaciousness and evoke transparency, even while timbral and harmonic shifts
gently impose their own emotional agenda. Each recording promotes a feeling of stillness and
solitude in open space, virtually manifesting a ‘space to think’ via long and distant echoes.
Sleek and luminous, Airports invites listeners to dwell serenely and alone in a limbo where,
62 Peter Adey, ‘Airports, Mobility, and the Calculative Architecture of Affective Control’, Geoforum 39 (2009): 442.
63 Adey, ‘Airports, Mobility, and the Calculative Architecture of Affective Control’, Geoforum 39 (2009), 444–7.
64 John Allen, ‘Ambient Power: Berlin’s Potsdamer Platz and the Seductive Logic of Public Spaces’, Urban Studies 43/2
(February 2006): 443. Helmut Jahn, the architect who designed Allen’s chief case study, the Sony Center on Berlin’s
Potsdamer Platz, incidentally also designed the terminal extension to Flughafen Köln/Bonn completed in 2002.
65 Allen, ‘Ambient Power’, 445.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
322 Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports
as Eno’s collaborator David Byrne once described heaven, ‘nothing ever happens’.66 It locates
listeners within the experiential architecture of the airport, and of air travel more generally,
while yet giving them more ‘room’ to breathe and reflect than does your average modern
airport or airplane.
In this way, Eno’s audio productions on Airports idealize airports and airplanes as spaces
conducive to calm and contemplation. As Eno himself recalls, he created Airports while
imagining ‘this ideal airport where it’s late at night; you’re sitting there and there are not
many people around you: you’re just seeing planes take off through the smoked windows’.67 Yet
Eno’s designs neither contradict the anxiety-inducing reality in which inhabitants’ immediate
futures are suspended between architecture, automated machinery, ground control, and their
own thoughts. Rather, his recordings subtly acknowledge this reality while also aestheticizing
it, smoothing its intensities, and diminishing the stakes of its consequences.
Eno’s Airports recordings might hence be understood as mimicking the ‘softer’ ways in
which modern institutions of human management, such as airports and airlines, manage
risk and anxiety on a large scale. Their virtual arrays bolster listeners’ cognitive sense of
‘safety’ by predictably remaining within a constrained framework of possibility, a feature
that allows the recordings to recede outside listeners’ attentional fields. Eno’s sounds thus
mimic the manner in which infrastructural institutions such as airports attempt to stabilize
individuals’ phenomenological horizons. Anthony Giddens has most broadly theorized how
vast infrastructures such as public transportation, global capitalism, and public health aim
to ‘bracket’ and defer the possibility of high-risk consequence outside individuals’ subjective
worlds of experience, buttressing the positions from which each person ‘orders contingent
events in relation to risk and potential alarms’.68 On the face of these institutions’ facades
of safety and invisibility, however, openly lurks the reality that these systems regulate both a
heightened intensity and widened scope of disaster, the prevention of which lies outside any
one individual’s control.69 The contingency of one’s own security within these operations,
Giddens asserts, results in a generalized unease pervading the modern experiential world:
‘Radical doubt’, he writes, ‘filters into most aspects of day-to-day life . . . Living in a secular
risk culture is inherently unsettling.’70
Giddens’s analysis gives insight into another parallel between airport experience and Eno’s
Airports: even as the recordings’ monotony promises to assure listeners of future stability,
their reductionism can seem uncannily facile – over-certain, even, in light of their variably
fortuitous permutations. From the perspective of listeners such as The Black Dog, this mimesis
might seem like an extension of the ‘false utopia’ enacted through airports’ slick architectural
designs. Yet the hints of estrangement running through Eno’s album, as with The Black Dog’s
66 Talking Heads, ‘Heaven’, Fear of Music, Sire, SRK 6076, LP, 1979.
67 Jim Aikin, ‘Brian Eno’, Keyboard, July 1981, 62.
68 Anthony Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Cambridge: Polity Press,
1991), 128. For more on the phenomenology of infrastructure, see John Durham Peters, The Marvelous Clouds:
Toward a Philosophy of Elemental Media (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015), 30–8.
69 Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity, 130.
70 Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity, 181.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports 323
Table 3 Documented airport installations of Music for Airports.
Year
1980
1980
1982
1984
unknown
Airport
City
LaGuardia Airport
Minneapolis-St Paul International Airport
Greater Pittsburgh International Airport
Tegel Airport
Guarulhos International Airport
New York City, USA
Minneapolis, USA
Pittsburgh, USA
Berlin, Germany
São Paulo, Brazil
more overt malaise, give the lie to the security airports promise. Shades of loss and longing
undercut the music’s ongoingness, almost as if the recordings themselves felt melancholy
over the impermanence of their own playback.
Domestic departures
The fact that Eno’s Airports conveys a mixture of awe and apprehension characteristic of
airport dwelling and commercial air travel hides behind a number of fronts: by the ‘for’ in
the album title, by Eno’s comparisons with Muzak, and by the genre term ‘Ambient’. These
factors insinuate that the music is meant to be a tool of public management in airports, not
a depiction or evocation of what air travel is like.71 A slippage between the genre term and
colloquialism ‘ambient music’ hence arises easily and naturally, such as in Anahid Kassabian’s
claim that Ambient music was rendered obsolete in the 1980s when corporate music service
providers largely switched from ‘background music’ to vocal-pop ‘foreground music’.72 This
misapprehension of the ‘Ambient’ genre term as referring to publicly programmed music
(or ‘music not chosen’, as Kassabian calls it) ignores the contexts of commercial record
production, mass distribution, and personal consumption through which Eno’s Ambient
records, and most music categorized as ‘Ambient’ since, have primarily circulated.
Although Eno sold Airports in 1978 on the merits of its readiness to airport reception,
he did so mainly through the rock record market. Within its first year of release, Music for
Airports was publicized and reviewed as a crossover avant-rock record in periodicals such as
Melody Maker, Musician, New York Times, Rolling Stone, Village Voice, and Vogue.73 Airports
would eventually become programmed in real airports, but not for over a year after its
commercial debut. The documented instances of airport installations since then make up a
short list (Table 3). Given the record’s quarter-million sales numbers (and exceeding number
of YouTube plays, in 2016), one can soundly assume that at least as many people have listened
71 Such publicly programmed music has been termed, perhaps too generally, ‘functional music’ or ‘programmed
music’; see, for instance, Jones and Schumacher, ‘Muzak’; Sterne, ‘Sounds like the Mall of America’.
72 Kassabian, Ubiquitous Listening, 5.
73 See footnote 20; also Ian Birch, ‘Ambient 1/Music for Airports’, Melody Maker, 17 March 1979, 32; Lester Bangs,
‘Eno’, 44; Robert Christgau, ‘Brian Eno: Music for Airports’, Village Voice, 2 July 1979; David Sargent, ‘Recordings’,
Vogue, July 1979, 26.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
324 Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports
to Eno’s album intentionally as have had it imposed upon them in public. Eno admitted as
much in a 1984 interview when asked where he imagined his Ambient music being heard.
‘Initially public places’, he answered, ‘but when you make a record you are making it for a
living room’.74
Eno amended his conception of Ambient music shortly following the release of Airports.
Although he continued to use Ambient music in site-specific audiovisual installations, Eno
began regarding Ambient music as adaptable to different listening situations, with personal
listening imagined as its most likely mode of reception.75 It became evident to the jet-setting
avant-pop producer as he increasingly travelled long distances that this need not occur in
one’s ‘living room’: ‘When I was travelling a lot, I used to carry four or five cassettes that I
knew could reliably produce a certain condition for me’, Eno recalled in 1984. ‘I realized that
while I was living this nomadic life, the one thing that was really keeping me in place, or giving
me a sense of place, was music.’76 Due to this realization, developing musical atmospheres
became less about enhancing a given place for Eno, and more about delivering listeners into
‘more desirable’ worlds. ‘This is escapism in a sense’, Eno has reflected, ‘but it isn’t retreating
from one world so much as advancing on another.’77 (Ironically, portable listening devices
would also make more available to willing listeners the possibility of hearing Airports within
real airports, as Eno originally imagined.)
Eno reinforced his revised expectations for Ambient music in the liner notes to Ambient 4:
On Land, released in March 1982 as the fourth and final instalment of the Ambient series. With
this album, Eno sought to exploit the music recording’s ability to generate, for individual
listeners, a ‘sense of place that complements and alters your environment’.78 When Editions
E. G. re-released the album on CD in 1986, Eno reflected in the liner notes that he had been
exploiting this capability for quite some time already:
The idea of making music that in some way related to a sense of place – landscape,
environment – had occurred to me many times over the years preceding On Land.
Each time, however, I relegated it to a mental shelf because it hadn’t risen above being
just another idea – a diagram rather than a living and breathing music. In retrospect,
I now see the influence of this idea, and the many covert attempts to realise it,
running through most of the work that I’ve released like an unacknowledged but
central theme.79
74 Brian Eno, ‘Aurora Musicalis’, interview by Anthony Korner, Artforum 24/10 (Summer 1986), 77.
75 While most of Eno’s Ambient music records were not composed explicitly to be programmed in certain spaces,
Opal Records has issued, in limited quantities, several collections of Ambient music that Eno originally made for
site-specific audiovisual installations, including Extracts from Music for White Cube (1997), Lightness: Music for the
Marble Palace (1997), I Dormienti (1999), Kite Stories (1999), Music for Civic Recovery Centre (2000), and Compact
Forest Proposal (2001).
76 Eno, ‘Aurora Musicalis’, 78.
77 Mick Brown, ‘Life of Brian according to Eno’, Arts Guardian, 1 May 1982, 10.
78 Steven Grant, ‘Brian Eno against Interpretation’, Trouser Press, August 1982, 30.
79 Brian Eno, liner notes to Ambient 4: On Land, Editions E. G., EEGCD 20, CD, 1986.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports 325
Eno’s reflection gives reason to interpret Music for Airports as one such covert attempt to
relate to listeners, musically, a sense of place.
Eno’s revised conception of his music also gives reason to locate the affective and
associational aspects of Airports, and of Ambient music more broadly, within the times
and spaces of personal musical programming. To help demarcate Ambient music’s place
within this regime, I borrow from Steven Brown and Töres Theorell, who distinguish
self-programmed music from publicly administered music by calling the former ‘personal
enhancement background music’ (or PEBM), and the latter ‘milieu music’.80 Individuals
generally select PEBM themselves, and use it for emotional control and motivational
assistance.81 Eno’s ‘Ambient Music’ essay, in stating that Ambient music is ‘ostensibly (but
not exclusively)’ for specified public spaces, notably retains the possibility that Airports and
other Ambient music might be used as PEBM, despite their apparent site-specificity.82 His
references to ‘conventional background music’ in the essay notably encompass the light
classical arrangements found on ‘mood music’ records or easy-listening radio stations.83 Eno
hence distinguished Ambient music from ‘conventional background music’, it seems, not
simply to convince listeners of Ambient’s superior suitability for public environments, but
also to assert its preferability over most other music marketed as PEBM.
Eno additionally insisted that Ambient music need not remain in the ‘background’
of listeners’ perceptual fields. Though unobtrusive, Ambient music should be capable of
sustaining aesthetic interest within the fluidly more-or-less-attentive conditions of everyday
record listening. One may well use Ambient recordings to transform space and mood
while also, intermittently, contemplating the expressive forms guiding these sensuous
(dis)orientations. From this perspective, aesthetic listening sits aside Ambient music’s
other uses; the less specific ‘personal enhancement music’, or PEM, may hence be a more
apt description of Ambient music’s applicability within a regime of flexibly attentive or
‘ubiquitous’ listening.84
80 Steven Brown and Töres Theorell, ‘The Social Uses of Background Music for Personal Enhancement’, in Music and
Manipulation: On the Social Uses and Social Control of Music, ed. Steven Brown and Ulrik Volgsten (New York:
Berghahn Books, 2006), 126–8.
81 Brown and Theorell, ‘The Social Uses of Background Music for Personal Enhancement’, 128. Tia DeNora speaks of
these uses in the context of music as a ‘technology of the self’; see DeNora, Music in Everyday Life, 46–74. See also
Andrew Williams, Portable Music and Its Functions. Vol. 6: Music (Meanings) (New York: Peter Lang, 2007).
82 Much as The Black Dog titled Music for Real Airports after Eno’s album, Eno himself styled the title Music for Airports
after the easy-listening ‘theme albums’ that proliferated in the post-war years, beginning with Paul Weston and His
Orchestra’s Music for Dreaming LP (Capitol, 1945). On the history of the ‘theme album’, see Keir Keightley, ‘Music
for Middlebrows: Defining the Easy Listening Era, 1946–1966’, American Music 26/3 (Fall 2008), 317–21.
83 The use of light classical music for flexibly attentive personal listening had its earliest historical precedent in radio;
see Susan J. Douglas, Listening In: Radio and the American Imagination (New York: Random House, 1999), 6–8 and
27–30; David Goodman, ‘Distracted Listening: On Not Making Sound Choices in the 1930s’, in Sound in the Age
of Mechanical Reproduction, ed. David Suisman and Susan Strasser (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press,
2005); Keightley, ‘Music for Middlebrows’, 314–17.
84 I choose PEM rather than Anahid Kassabian’s ‘ubiquitous music’ in order to distinguish personal from public
applications, which Kassabian does not; see Kassabian, Ubiquitous Listening.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
326 Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports
Eno’s assertions that Ambient music should retain a sense of doubt, and that art should
provide a space for disorientation, also offer insight into how he might have imagined Ambient
music’s ambivalent moods as providing ‘personal enhancement’ for the record user. His
insistence on the primacy of art’s disorienting function recalls a range of aesthetic techniques
and theories, from Victor Shklovsky’s остранение (ostranenie or defamiliarization) to
Berthold Brecht’s Verfremdungseffekt (estrangement effect), Sergei Eisenstein’s montage
theory, Walter Benjamin’s ‘profane illumination’, and Guy Debord’s détournement, all of
which advanced the modernist avant-garde goal of shocking art’s audiences out of habitual
perception, and into an enhanced or altered awareness of everyday life.85 Eno’s Ambient
music, as Daniel Barbiero puts it, ‘sublimates’ this alienating shock of modernist art ‘into a
nuanced undertone’.86 In the form of PEM, this undertone may slip quietly into that realm of
habit, home, and routine called ‘everyday life’, where listeners might wake up to disorientation
and uncertainty on their own time.87
Future study of Ambient music may well expand upon the ways this ambivalence serves
listeners not just as a resource for personal enhancement on a day-to-day level, but
also as a resource for self-identity. Ambient music, anonymous as it might seem, may
nonetheless as PEM help listeners condition their private environments to reflect their
personal identities and ideals, a process that Tia DeNora calls ‘identity work’.88 By producing
moods involving melancholy, alienation, and uncertainty, Ambient recordings offer their
listeners the unconventional pleasure of electing to feel ambivalent – perhaps a more appealing
sort of mood enhancement for social critics, or sceptics of the idea that musical listening
should be entirely ‘easy’.
Ambient recordings as ambivalent places of passage
The preceding analysis of Music for Airports provides a blueprint for interpreting Ambient
music recordings as tools of personal enhancement whose conceptual, visual, and musical
designs promote affective mixtures of safety and uncertainty.89 Ambient recordings offer
listeners an everyday resource for relaxation, mood enhancement or adjustment, and
85 Viktor Shklovsky, ‘Art as Technique’, in The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends, 3rd edn, ed.
David H. Richter (1917; repr. Boston and New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2007); Berthold Brecht, ‘A Short Organum
for the Theatre’, in Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic, ed. and trans. John Willett (1947–48; repr.
New York: Hill and Wang, 2001); Sergei Eisenstein, ‘A Dialectic Approach to Film Form’, in Film Form: Essays in
Film Theory, ed. and trans. Jay Leyda (1931; repr. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace & Co., 1977); Walter Benjamin,
‘Surrealism’, in Walter Benjamin, Selected Writings, vol. 2, ed. Marcus Bullock and Michael W. Jennings (1929,
repr. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2004); Guy Debord, ‘A User’s Guide to Détournement’, in Situationist International
Anthology, rev. edn, ed. and trans. Ken Knabb (1956; repr. Berkeley, CA: Bureau of Public Secrets, 2006).
86 Daniel Barbiero, ‘After the Aging of the New Music’, Telos 82 (Winter 1989–90), 148. Thanks to Sumanth Gopinath
for this reference.
87 Rita Felski, ‘The Invention of Everyday Life’, New Formations 59 (1999).
88 DeNora, Music in Everyday Life, 62–74.
89 Thus far, the most sustained scholarship on Ambient music’s aesthetics along these conceptual lines can be found in
Eliot Bates, ‘Ambient Music’ (MA diss., Wesleyan University, 1997); Paul Roquet, ‘Ambient Landscapes from Brian
Eno to Tetsu Inoue’, Journal of Popular Music Studies 21/4 (December 2009); Paul Roquet, Ambient Media; Paul
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports 327
enhanced or altered awareness of their situations and surroundings. The preceding analysis
of Airports illustrates how predictable musical consistencies or invariants over long stretches
of time typically make these functions central to the Ambient aesthetic. Such invariants –
including drones and loops, as well as stable textures, dynamics, and pitch repertories –
produce indefinitely continuous experiential worlds that ground listeners’ cognitive security.
In so establishing stabilities to which listeners might become entrained or habituated, Ambient
recordings contour an extended virtual present that listeners might navigate and inhabit as
though it were spatial. Their indistinct evocations of other spaces provide listeners imagined
transport into an aestheticized time–space ‘in between’ the workaday and transcendent, a
place in time for reflection or gathering energy, or what Eno calls ‘the dream time, in your
daily life, times when things get sorted out and reshuffled’.90
As with Eno’s Airports or The Black Dog’s Real Airports, Ambient recordings might
accomplish these functions by evoking a sense of place or space associated with the mixed
moods they convey.91 Ambient music’s virtual spaces, in their unique makeup of stable and
unstable elements, may spark or stir experiential associations with various sorts of real places.
Listeners need not consciously reflect upon Ambient recordings’ space- and place-oriented
evocations to enjoy their atmospheres; such associations might even be beside the point of
Ambient music’s affective work while listening. Yet because PEM users normally program
recordings themselves, for themselves, these users’ aural experiences are often led by a spaceor place-oriented title and concept before the music gets selected, played, and heard. Placeand space-based themes can inform listeners’ intentions as programmers of experience, while
successful pairings of music and concept might also inspire listeners to return repeatedly to
these well-marked medial locations.
And yet, as scholars of ‘ubiquitous music’, ‘portable music’, and ‘music in everyday life’
have variously described, such functions are not unique to Ambient music recordings. PEM
users play music of many different kinds as part of a reflexive project of self-care that enhances
their daily living.92 By using music to establish stable spatial and temporal environments,
PEM users program and ‘colonize’ their own future comfort and mood much in the same
way that modern institutions plan, organize, and manage human experience to make it more
Roquet, ‘Atmosphere as Culture: Ambient Media and Postindustrial Japan’ (Ph.D. diss., UC Berkeley, 2012); and
Victor Szabo, ‘Ambient Music as Popular Genre: Historiography, Interpretation, Critique’ (PhD diss., University
of Virginia, 2015). Joanna Demers’s speculative philosophy on drone music emphasizes this affective quality of
several Ambient records, but abstracts their aesthetics from everyday personal use; see Joanna Demers, Drone and
Apocalypse: An Exhibit Catalog for the End of the World (Winchester, UK: Zero Books, 2015).
90 Kristine McKenna, ‘Eno’, Wet, July/August 1980, 44. Elisabeth Le Guin has likewise affirmed the value of Ambient
music along these lines as a feminist resource; Elisabeth Le Guin, ‘Uneasy Listening’, Repercussions 3/1 (Spring 1994).
91 For further discussion of Ambient music’s evocations of place and space in the context of electronic music aesthetics,
see Joanna Demers, Listening through the Noise: The Aesthetics of Experimental Electronic Music (New York: Oxford
University Press, 2010), 113–19.
92 Sam Binkley, Getting Loose: Lifestyle Consumption in the 1970s (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007); Michael
Bull, Sounding Out the City: Personal Stereos and the Management of Everyday Life (New York: Berg, 2000); Michael
Bull, Sound Moves: iPod Culture and Urban Experience (New York: Routledge, 2007); DeNora, Music in Everyday Life;
Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity; Kassabian, Ubiquitous Listening; Williams, Portable Music and Its Functions.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
328 Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports
reliable.93 Moreover, the Ambient recording is not alone in its ability to conjure a sense of
place or space. All sorts of recorded music can be understood as virtual sites of association
with real spaces by dint of their conceptual frames, aesthetic designs, and affective qualities.
So what makes Ambient music special here?
As I have alluded earlier, Ambient aesthetics point to the medial place of recorded music
design in everyday life. Various scholars in media theory and philosophy have provided
some conceptual tools for understanding this medial space. Media scholar Jody Berland, for
instance, has described music recordings as reconfiguring spatial situations into temporal
designs that operate within a ‘sociomusical “third space”’ or ‘time-outside-of-space’.94 In
playback, recordings disembed listeners from local space, while ‘“placing” listeners in their
affective and topographic worlds’.95 One might otherwise imagine this temporalized world
in terms of Augé’s ‘non-place’, or perhaps in terms of the virtual spaces-outside-of-place
that Foucault calls ‘heterotopias’.96 These designs’ mediating function, however, may best be
captured by Henri Bergson’s concept of the place of passage, ‘A connecting link between the
things which act upon me and the things upon which I act – the seat, in a word, of sensorimotor phenomena.’97 As Edward Casey theorizes it, a place of passage may simultaneously
act as an intra-place, an environing place (or mood) within which things move, and as an
inter-place, or a transportive place (or mood) that sends masses into motion.98 Recorded
music, like the listening bodies it both contains and is contained by, affectively stabilizes
physical spaces of reception at the same time as it unsettles them, disposing inhabitants to
departures from their given locations and arrivals at new moods. As active medial locations,
musical recordings structure and orient the terrain of the personal and habitual everyday,
while also opening this terrain to new possible corridors, vectors, passages, and paths.
Do these descriptions of recorded music’s place in personal listening seem reminiscent of
the discussions of airport space earlier? I should hope so. As Music for Airports illustrates,
Ambient music is not just well suited to evoking place, creating space, and altering mood, but
also aesthetically thematizes these functionalities of recorded music through its place-oriented
metaphors, spatializing techniques, and mixed moods. Hence, it is no coincidence that
Eno came to describe Ambient recordings’ functional flexibility in terms of the paradoxical
duality of predictability and uncertainty conveyed by Airports’s design. As Eno has attested,
the Ambient record provides a ‘reliable experience’ for its consumer; yet, at the same
93 Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity, 133.
94 Jody Berland, ‘Locating Listening’, in The Place of Music, ed. Andrew Leyshon, David Matless, and George Revill
(New York: Guilford, 1998), 131 and 139.
95 Berland, ‘Locating Listening’, 138. On the ‘disembedding’ function of recorded music, see also Bull, Sound Moves;
Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity, 146–7; Watkins, ‘Musical Ecologies of Place and Placelessness’, 408.
96 Augé, Non-Places; Michel Foucault, ‘Of Other Spaces, Heterotopias’, trans. Jay Miskowiec, Diacritics 16/1 (Spring
1986). For further discussion of heterotopia in music, see Nicholas Reyland, ‘The Spaces of Dream: Lutosławski’s
Modernist Heterotopias’, Twentieth-Century Music 12/1 (March 2015).
97 Henri Bergson, Matter and Memory, trans. N. M. Paul and W. S. Palmer (New York: Doubleday, 1959), 145; as
quoted in Edward S. Casey, Remembering: A Phenomenological Study, 2nd edn (Bloomington: Indiana University
Press, 2000), 195.
98 Casey, Remembering, 196.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports 329
time, it ‘generates unpredictability rather than repetition’ by variously adapting to different
listening scenarios.99 By summoning a sense of ‘being in between’ predictability and the
unknown, Airports aestheticizes the flexible applicability of recorded music within our
contemporary everyday auditory ecology. The planned openness rendered by Eno’s expressive
designs on Airports gives shape, weight, and texture to the idea of musical recordings as
transportive places, determinate in form and progression, but underdetermined with regard
to their personal uses and emplacements. The Ambient recording’s seemingly placeless
evocations of space and ambivalence are accordingly not simply atmospheric, functional,
or personally enhancing, but also express the intra-place/inter-place undecidability of the
Ambient recording’s mediation.
In short, Ambient designs interpret, metaphorize, and aestheticize the atmospheres and
transportations their recordings provide. The aesthetics of Ambient music are thus central, not
ancillary to the music’s typification as such. The genre name does not primarily communicate
that Ambient music can function as a transportive environment; rather, it communicates
that the music’s space- and transport-based aesthetics reflexively afford atmospheric and
transportive use.100 The Ambient genre name’s evocation of the motile atmospheric surround
may be understood as what John Frow calls a ‘metacommunication’ about the mediations
its recordings perform.101 Ambient recordings belong to the Ambient genre by reflecting
aesthetically upon their own environing and transportive functions.
What’s more, as the prior comparison of Eno’s and The Black Dog’s albums illustrates,
Ambient music’s mixed moods inflect these aesthetic reflections in particular ways. In so
far as it is seductively beautiful – and it is, often – Ambient music affirms the value of
personal withdrawal, solitude, and aesthetic reflection in everyday life, virtues that most
media scholars of ‘everyday’ music have, perhaps cynically, denied the modern everyday
subject.102 Yet Ambient music’s self-reflexively ambivalent aesthetics, I would venture, is what
makes Ambient music both useful as an everyday resource for living, and as ‘interesting’ as it
is ignorable (to paraphrase Eno). Its ambivalence reflects back upon the ease of its purposing,
rendering the isolating act of personal programming at once edifying and troubled. As Paul
99 Eno, ‘Aurora Musicalis’, 78; Rob Tannenbaum, ‘A Meeting of Sound Minds: John Cage & Brian Eno’, Musician,
September 1985, 69.
100 My use of the term ‘afford’ here is informed by James J. Gibson’s theory of affordances, which describes how
environmental features provide or ‘afford’ inhabitants particular abilities or behaviors; see James J. Gibson, The
Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986). Applications of Gibson’s
theory to recorded music listening can be found in Eric F. Clarke, Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the
Perception of Musical Meaning (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005); DeNora, Music in Everyday Life.
101 John Frow, Genre (New York: Routledge, 2005), 17.
102 David Hesmondhalgh has taken issue with this stereotypical presentation of ‘everyday life’ in music scholarship;
see David Hesmondhalgh, ‘Popular Music Audiences and Everyday Life’, in Popular Music Studies, ed. David
Hesmondhalgh and Keith Negus (London: Arnold, 2002). Another significant exception can be found in Adam
Krims’s re-description of everyday music listening and circulation in terms of an economy of design that brings
together ‘aesthetic and utilitiarian worlds under the rubric of the commercial’ (69); see Adam Krims, ‘The Changing
Functions of Music Recordings and Listening Practices’, in Recorded Music: Performance, Culture and Technology,
ed. Amanda Bayley (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
330 Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports
Roquet more generally observes of what he calls ‘ambient media’, works such as Airports
and Real Airports ‘hint’ that their own ‘mediated provision of calm may ultimately be a
fragile cover for larger social landscapes that are anything but relaxing’.103 Characteristically,
Ambient music’s more desirable worlds involve the inadequacy of our own, preserving as
part of their use a lingering trace of the inhumanity and social disconnection reinforced
by personal electronics. Tinged as they are with uncertainty, these atmospheres might
especially nourish those consumers who find the neoliberal technologization of the self both
alluring and potentially nefarious. They allow such listeners to externalize this ambivalence
by immersing themselves in a halo of vague, possibly unsettling reminiscence. One might
reasonably consider this use of recorded music of a piece with the Romantic quietism of what
Timothy Morton calls, after Hegel, ‘beautiful soul syndrome’; while its unsettling undertones
may also resonate with what Rita Felski calls the ‘suspicious sensibility’ of the social critic.104
Yet, at its best, Ambient’s doubtful moods all the same re-enchant the world that it holds in
doubt, deepening and sharpening listeners’ capacity to slow down and take it all in.
Eno’s Music for Airports may not have inspired a trend in programmed music for
public spaces, but it did establish a new aesthetic framework for experiential design and
programming in personal listening. Then and now, recordings described as ‘Ambient’ revive
the impersonality, transience, and alienation experienced in modern transportation, reproducing the experience of technologically administered passage as one equally inviting
and alienating, connective and isolating, futuristic and nostalgic, moving and grounding. Yet
because Ambient recordings not only reflect upon living with technologies of transport, but
also take part in it, one may just as well regard airport experience, and the experience of flight
more broadly, as metaphors for the equally pacifying and unsettling experience of Ambient
music listening.
Bibliography
Adey, Peter. ‘Airports, Mobility, and the Calculative Architecture of Affective Control’. Geoforum 39 (2009), 438–51.
Aikin, Jim. ‘Brian Eno’. Keyboard, July 1981, 42–66.
Allen, John. ‘Ambient Power: Berlin’s Potsdamer Platz and the Seductive Logic of Public Spaces’. Urban Studies
43/2 (February 2006), 441–55.
Anniss, Matt. ‘Ambient House: The Story of Chill Out Music, 1988–95’. Red Bull Music Academy, 17 February 2016.
http://daily.redbullmusicacademy.com/specials/2016-ambient-house-feature/ (accessed 18 February 2016).
Augé, Marc. Non-Places: An Introduction to Supermodernity, 2nd edn., trans. John Howe. New York: Verso, 2008.
Bangs, Lester. ‘Eno’. Musician, Player & Listeneri, November 1979, 38–44.
Barber, Lynden. ‘Atmospheres in the Home’. Hyperreal Archives. http://music.hyperreal.org/artists/brian˙eno/
interviews/rvonland.html (accessed 18 January 2014).
Barbiero, Daniel. ‘After the Aging of the New Music’. Telos 82 (Winter 1989–90), 144–50.
Barnes, Stephen H. Muzak: The Hidden Messages in Music. Vol. 9: Studies on the History and Interpretation of Music.
Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1988.
Barrow, Jack. ‘The Orb’, booklet notes to Trance Europe Express by various artists. CD, Total Record Co. via BMG
(UK) Ltd., TEEX 1, 1993. 120–4.
Bates, Eliot. ‘Ambient Music’. MA diss., Wesleyan University, 1997.
103 Roquet, Ambient Media, 18.
104 Morton, Ecology without Nature, 109–23; Rita Felski, The Limits of Critique (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
2015), 14–51.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports 331
Benjamin, Walter. ‘Surrealism’, in Walter Benjamin, Selected Writings, vol. 2, ed. Marcus Bullock and
Michael W. Jennings. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2004. 207–18.
Berland, Jody. ‘Locating Listening’, in The Place of Music, ed. Andrew Leyshon, David Matless, and George Revill.
New York: Guilford, 1998. 129–50.
Binkley, Sam. Getting Loose: Lifestyle Consumption in the 1970s. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007.
Birch, Ian. ‘Ambient 1/ Music for Airports’. Melody Maker, 17 March 1979, 32.
Björnberg, Alf. ‘On Aeolian Harmony in Contemporary Popular Music’, trans. Philip Tagg. Department of
Musicology, University of Göteborg, 1984. www.tagg.org/others/othxpdfs/bjbgeol.pdf (accessed 20 March
2015).
Black Dog, The. ‘Music for Airports – Please Wait Here’. Internet Archive. http://web.archive.org/web/
20130121072521/http://www.musicforrealairports.com/live/index.php (accessed 14 January 2014).
Black Dog, The and Human. ‘Music for Real Airports’. Article Magazine, 22 April 2010, 57–9.
Bloom, Michael. ‘Ambient 1: Music for Airports’. Rolling Stone, 26 July 1979, 80.
Brecht, Berthold. ‘A Short Organum for the Theatre’, in Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic, ed.
and trans. John Willett. New York: Hill and Wang, 2001. 179–208.
Brown, Mick. ‘Life of Brian according to Eno’. Arts Guardian, 1 May 1982, 10.
Brown, Steven and Töres Theorell. ‘The Social Uses of Background Music for Personal Enhancement’, in Music and
Manipulation: On the Social Uses and Social Control of Music, ed. Steven Brown and Ulrik Volgsten. New York:
Berghahn Books, 2006. 126–60.
Bull, Michael. Sounding Out the City: Personal Stereos and the Management of Everyday Life. New York: Berg, 2000.
———. Sound Moves: iPod Culture and Urban Experience. New York: Routledge, 2007.
Carroll, Noël. ‘Art and Mood: Preliminary Notes and Conjectures’. The Monist 86/4 (2003), 521–55.
Casey, Edward S. ‘How to Get from Space to Place in a Fairly Short Stretch of Time: Phenomenological Prolegomena’,
in Senses of Place, ed. Steven Feld and Keith H. Basso. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 1996.
12–52.
———. Remembering: A Phenomenological Study, 2nd edn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2000.
Christgau, Robert. ‘Brian Eno: Music for Airports’. Village Voice, 2 July 1979.
———. ‘Brian Eno: On Land’. Village Voice, 31 August 1982.
Clarke, Eric F. Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning. New York: Oxford
University Press, 2005.
Debord, Guy. ‘A User’s Guide to Détournement’, in Situationist International Anthology, rev. edn, ed. and trans.
Ken Knabb. Berkeley, CA: Bureau of Public Secrets, 2006. 14–20.
Demers, Joanna. Listening through the Noise: The Aesthetics of Experimental Electronic Music. New York: Oxford
University Press, 2010.
———. Drone and Apocalypse: An Exhibit Catalog for the End of the World. Winchester, UK: Zero Books, 2015.
Demorest, Stephen. ‘The Discreet Charm of Brian Eno: An English Pop Theorist Seeks to Redefine Music’. Horizon,
June 1978, 82–5.
DeNora, Tia. Music in Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Douglas, Susan J. Listening In: Radio and the American Imagination. New York: Random House, 1999.
Eisenstein, Sergei. ‘A Dialectic Approach to Film Form’, in Film Form: Essays in Film Theory, ed. and trans. Jay Leyda.
Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace, 1977. 45–63.
Emerson, Ken. ‘Brian Eno Slips into “Trance Music”’. New York Times, 12 August 1979, D22.
Eno, Brian. ‘Ambient Music’. Liner notes for Ambient 1: Music for Airports. LP. Editions E. G., AMB 001, 1978.
———. ‘Aurora Musicalis’. Interview by Anthony Korner. Artforum 24/10 (Summer 1986), 76–9.
———. Liner notes to Ambient 4: On Land. CD. Editions E. G., EEGCD 20, 1986.
———. A Year with Swollen Appendices. London: Faber & Faber, 1996.
———. ‘Opening Holland Festival’. Interview by Martin Large. NOS (Netherlands Broadcasting Foundation), 5
June 1999. TV.
Felski, Rita. ‘The Invention of Everyday Life’. New Formations 59 (1999), 15–31.
———. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
Fink, Robert. Repeating Ourselves: American Minimal Music as Cultural Practice. Berkeley: University of California
Press, 2005.
Foucault, Michel. ‘Of Other Spaces, Heterotopias’, trans. Jay Miskowiec. Diacritics 16/1 (Spring 1986), 22–7.
Frohne, Ursula. ‘Brian Eno: Tegel Airport, Institute Unzeit, Berlin’. FlashArt, May 1984, 43.
Frow, John. Genre. New York: Routledge, 2005.
Gibson, James J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986.
Giddens, Anthony. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press,
1991.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
332 Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports
Gill, Andy. ‘Brian Eno: Towards an Understanding of Pop Past and Present’, Q, November 1993. www.
rocksbackpages.com/Library/Article/brian-eno-towards-an-understanding-of-pop-past-and-present (accessed
15 July 2013).
Goodman, David. ‘Distracted Listening: On Not Making Sound Choices in the 1930s’, in Sound in the Age of
Mechanical Reproduction, ed. David Suisman and Susan Strasser. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press,
2005. 15–46.
Grant, Steven. ‘Brian Eno against Interpretation’. Trouser Press, August 1982, 27–30.
Hesmondhalgh, David. ‘Popular Music Audiences and Everyday Life’, in Popular Music Studies, ed.
David Hesmondhalgh and Keith Negus. London: Arnold, 2002. 117–30.
Hobson, Chris. ‘Music by Real People for Real People (in Real Airports)’. MNML SSGS. http://mnmlssg.
blogspot.com/2010/06/music-by-real-people-for-real-people-in.html (accessed 16 December 2013).
Holmes, Thom. Electronic and Experimental Music: Technology, Music, and Culture, 3rd edn. New York: Routledge,
2008.
Husch, Jerri Ann. ‘Music of the Workplace: A Study of Muzak Culture’. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts,
1984.
Jahdi, Robin. Review of Music for Real Airports (2010) by The Black Dog. FACT. www.factmag.com/2010/
07/14/the-black-dog-music-for-real-airports/ (accessed 15 May 2012).
Jones, Simon C. and Thomas G. Schumacher. ‘Muzak: On Functional Music and Power’. Critical Studies in Mass
Communication 9/2 (June 1992), 156–69.
Kassabian, Anahid. Ubiquitous Listening: Affect, Attention, and Distributed Subjectivity. Berkeley: University of
California Press, 2013.
Keightley, Keir. ‘Music for Middlebrows: Defining the Easy Listening Era, 1946–1966’. American Music 26/3 (Fall
2008), 309–35.
Krims, Adam. ‘The Changing Functions of Music Recordings and Listening Practices’, in Recorded Music:
Performance, Culture and Technology, ed. Amanda Bayley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 68–85.
Lanza, Joseph. Elevator Music: A Surreal History of Muzak, Easy-Listening, and Other Moodsong. New York: Picador,
1995.
Le Guin, Elisabeth. ‘Uneasy Listening’. Repercussions 3/1 (Spring 1994), 5–19.
MacDonald, Ian. ‘Another False World: Part 2: How to Make a Modern Record’. New Musical Express, 3 December
1977, 31–4.
Marcus, George H. Functionalist Design: An Ongoing History. Munich and New York: Prestel- Verlag, 1995.
McKean, Colin. Review of Music for Real Airports (2010) by The Black Dog. The Quietus.
http://thequietus.com/articles/04326-the-black-dog-music-for-real-airports-album-review (accessed 15 May
2012).
McKenna, Kristine. ‘Eno’. Wet, July/August 1980, 41–5.
Moore, Lee. ‘Eno = MC Squared’. Creem, November 1978, 67.
Morton, Timothy. Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 2007.
Murphy, Scott. ‘Scoring Loss in Some Recent Popular Film and Television’. Music Theory Spectrum 36/2 (2014),
295–314.
North, Adrian C. and David J. Hargreaves. ‘Music in Business Environments’, in Music and Manipulation: On the
Social Uses and Social Control of Music, ed. Steven Brown and Ulrik Volgsten. New York: Berghahn Books, 2006.
103–25.
O’Brien, Glenn. ‘Eno at the Edge of Rock’. Interview, June 1978, 31–2.
Palmer, Robert. ‘Brian Eno, New Guru of Rock, Going Solo’. New York Times, 13 March 1981, C17.
Peters, John Durham. The Marvelous Clouds: Toward a Philosophy of Elemental Media. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 2015.
Petry, Daniel. Review of Music for Real Airports (2010) by The Black Dog. Resident Advisor.
www.residentadvisor.net/review-view.aspx?id=7404 (accessed 15 May 2012).
Pratt, R. L. and P. E. Doak. ‘A Subjective Rating Scale for Timbre’. Journal of Sound and Vibration 45/3 (1976),
317–28.
Prendergast, Mark. The Ambient Century: From Mahler to Trance: The Evolution of Sound in the Electronic Age. New
York: Bloomsbury USA, 2000.
Priest, Eldritch. ‘Felt as Thought (or, Music Abstraction and the Semblance of Affect)’, in Sound, Music, Affect:
Theorizing Sonic Experience, ed. Marie Thompson and Ian Biddle. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.
45–63.
Radano, Ronald M. ‘Interpreting Muzak: Speculations on Musical Experience in Everyday Life’. American Music
7/4 (Winter 1989), 448–60.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X
Szabo Unsettling Brian Eno’s Music for Airports 333
Reyland, Nicholas. ‘The Spaces of Dream: Lutosławski’s Modernist Heterotopias’. Twentieth- Century Music 12/1
(March 2015), 37–70.
Richardson, Mark. ‘As Ignorable As It Is Interesting: The Ambient Music of Brian Eno’. Pitchfork Media.
http://pitchfork.com/features/resonant-frequency/5879-resonant-frequency-17/ (accessed 3 May 2017).
Roquet, Paul. ‘Ambient Landscapes from Brian Eno to Tetsu Inoue’. Journal of Popular Music Studies 21/4 (December
2009), 264–83.
———. Ambient Media: Japanese Atmospheres of Self. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016.
———. ‘Atmosphere as Culture: Ambient Media and Postindustrial Japan’, PhD diss., UC Berkeley, 2012.
Rose, Frank. ‘Four Conversations with Brian Eno’. The Village Voice, 28 March 1977, 69–72.
Rush, George. ‘Brian Eno: Rock’s Svengali Pursues Silence’. Esquire, December 1982, 130–2.
Sargent, David. ‘Recordings’. Vogue, July 1979, 26.
Schaberg, Christopher. The Textual Life of Airports: Reading the Culture of Flight. New York: Continuum, 2012.
Sheppard, David. On Some Faraway Beach: The Life and Times of Brian Eno. Chicago: Chicago Review Press, 2009.
Shklovsky, Viktor. ‘Art as Technique’, in The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends, 3rd edn, ed.
David H. Richter. Boston and New York: Bedford/St Martin’s, 2007. 775–84.
Jonathan Sterne, ‘Sounds like the Mall of America: Programmed Music and the Architectonics of Commercial
Space’, Ethnomusicology 41/1 (Winter 1997), 22–50.
Sun, Cecilia. ‘Resisting the Airport: Bang on a Can Performs Brian Eno’. Musicology Australia 29/1 (2007), 135–59.
Szabo, Victor. ‘Ambient Music as Popular Genre: Historiography, Interpretation, Critique’. PhD diss., University
of Virginia, 2015.
Tagg, Philip. ‘“Universal” Music and the Case of Death’. Critical Quarterly 35/2 (1993), 54–98.
Tannenbaum, Rob. ‘A Meeting of Sound Minds: John Cage & Brian Eno’. Musician, September 1985, 65–72 and
106.
Toop, David. Ocean of Sound: Aether Talk, Ambient Sound and Imaginary Worlds. London: Serpent’s Tail, 1995.
Vanel, Hervé. Triple Entendre: Furniture Music, Muzak, Muzak-Plus. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2013.
Watkins, Holly. ‘Musical Ecologies of Place and Placelessness’. Journal of the American Musicological Society 64/2
(Summer 2011), 404–8.
Williams, Andrew. Portable Music and Its Functions. Vol. 6: Music (Meanings). New York: Peter Lang, 2007.
Discography
Black Dog, The. Music for Real Airports. Soma Quality Recordings, CD083, 2010, CD.
Eno, Brian. Ambient 1: Music for Airports. Editions E. G. AMB 001, 1978, LP.
Talking Heads. Fear of Music. Sire. SRK 6076, 1979. LP.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 71.51.2.80, on 28 Jul 2017 at 18:02:23, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857221700024X