SAP2000-Steel Design-API RP2A PDF
SAP2000-Steel Design-API RP2A PDF
SAP2000-Steel Design-API RP2A PDF
for
The CSI Logo® and SAP2000® are registered trademarks of Computers and Structures, Inc.
The computer program SAP2000® and all associated documentation are proprietary and copyrighted
products. Worldwide rights of ownership rest with Computers and Structures, Inc. Unlicensed use of this
program or reproduction of documentation in any form, without prior written authorization from
Computers and Structures, Inc., is explicitly prohibited.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a
database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
CONSIDERABLE TIME, EFFORT, AND EXPENSE HAVE GONE INTO THE DEVELOPMENT
AND TESTING OF THIS SOFTWARE. HOWEVER, THE USER ACCEPTS AND UNDERSTANDS
THAT NO WARRANTY IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY THE DEVELOPERS OR THE
DISTRIBUTORS ON THE ACCURACY OR THE RELIABILITY OF THIS PRODUCT.
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Units 1
1.3 Symbols 1
2 Member Design 4
3 Joint Design 9
i
Steel Frame Design API RP 2A-WSD 21st Introduction
4 Supplements 2 and 3 14
5 References 17
Units ii
1 Introduction
This manual describes the steel frame design algorithms in the software for API Recommended
Practice 2A-WSD 21st Edition (American Petroleum Institute, 2000). The design algorithms in
the software for API RP 2A-WSD 21st cover allowable stress checks for typical structural
elements used in offshore steel structures, as detailed in this manual. Such elements are tubular
members and tubular joints. For other types of structural elements, the software uses AISC ASD
9th Edition. Requirements of the code not documented in this manual should be considered
using other methods.
This manual documents the design details for cylindrical sections having thickness t ≥ 6mm, D/t
< 300. Members of other section shapes are designed in accordance with AISC ASD 9th Edition
(American Institute of Steel Construction, 1989).
It is important to read this entire manual before using the design algorithms to become familiar
with any limitations of the algorithms or assumptions that have been made.
1.1 Units
The API RP 2A-WSD design code is based on kip, inch, and second units and as such, so is this
manual, unless noted otherwise. Any units, imperial, metric, or MKS may be used in the
software in conjunction with API RP 2A-WSD design.
1.3 Symbols
The following table provides a list of the symbols used in this manual, along with a short
Units 1
Steel Frame Design API RP 2A-WSD 21st Introduction
description. Where possible, the same symbol from the design code is used in this manual.
Symbols 2
Steel Frame Design API RP 2A-WSD 21st Introduction
Symbols 3
2 Member Design
This chapter provides the details of the structural steel design and stress check algorithms that
are used for cylindrical member design and checking at each output station in accordance with
API RP 2A-WSD.
Cylindrical members subjected solely to axial tension, axial compression, bending, shear, or
hydrostatic pressure are designed in accordance with API RP 2A-WSD Sections 3.2.1 to 3.2.5,
respectively. Cylindrical members subjected to combined loads without hydrostatic pressure are
designed in accordance with API RP 2A-WSD Sections 3.3.1 and 3.3.2. Cylindrical members
subjected to combined loads with hydrostatic pressure are designed in accordance with API RP
2A-WSD Sections 3.3.3 and 3.3.4.
Loading
𝑓𝑓𝑎𝑎
≤ 1.0 [API 3.2.1]
𝐹𝐹𝑡𝑡
Safety Factors 4
Steel Frame Design API RP 2A-WSD 21st Member Design
𝑓𝑓𝑎𝑎
≤ 1.0 [API 3.2.2]
𝐹𝐹𝑎𝑎
(𝐾𝐾𝐾𝐾 ⁄𝑟𝑟)2
⎧ �1 − � 𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦
⎪ 2𝐶𝐶𝑐𝑐2
⎪ for 𝐾𝐾𝐾𝐾 ⁄𝑟𝑟 < 𝐶𝐶𝑐𝑐
3(𝐾𝐾𝐾𝐾 ⁄𝑟𝑟) (𝐾𝐾𝐾𝐾 ⁄𝑟𝑟)3
𝐹𝐹𝑎𝑎 = 5⁄3 + 8𝐶𝐶 − [API Eq. 3.2.2-1]
⎨ 𝑐𝑐 8𝐶𝐶𝑐𝑐3
2
⎪ 12𝜋𝜋 𝐸𝐸
⎪
for 𝐾𝐾𝐾𝐾 ⁄𝑟𝑟 ≥ 𝐶𝐶𝑐𝑐
⎩23(𝐾𝐾𝐾𝐾 ⁄𝑟𝑟)2
where,
1⁄2
2𝜋𝜋 2 𝐸𝐸
𝐶𝐶𝑐𝑐 = � �
𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦
For members with D/t > 60, the yield strength, Fy, in the above equations is replaced by the
critical local buckling stress, defined as the minimum of Fxe or Fxc.
𝑓𝑓𝑏𝑏
≤ 1.0 [API 3.2.3]
𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏
Compression Check 5
Steel Frame Design API RP 2A-WSD 21st Member Design
𝐷𝐷 1500
⎧0.75𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦 for ≤
⎪ 𝑡𝑡 𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦
⎪ 𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦 𝐷𝐷 1500 𝐷𝐷 3000 [API Eq. 3.2.3-
𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏 = �0.84 − 1.74 � 𝐹𝐹 for < ≤
⎨ 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑦𝑦 𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦 𝑡𝑡 𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦 1a, 1b, and 1c]
⎪�0.72 − 0.58 𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦 𝐷𝐷 � 𝐹𝐹
⎪
for
3000 𝐷𝐷
< ≤ 300
⎩ 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑦𝑦 𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦 𝑡𝑡
𝑓𝑓𝑣𝑣
≤ 1.0 [API 3.2.4a]
𝐹𝐹𝑣𝑣
The maximum beam shear stress, fv, and the allowable beam shear stress Fv are defined as:
𝑉𝑉
𝑓𝑓𝑣𝑣 = [API Eq. 3.2.4-1]
0.5𝐴𝐴
𝐹𝐹𝑣𝑣 = 0.4𝑓𝑓𝑦𝑦 [API Eq. 3.2.4-2]
Shear Check 6
Steel Frame Design API RP 2A-WSD 21st Member Design
𝐿𝐿
𝑀𝑀 = (2 𝐷𝐷⁄𝑡𝑡)1⁄2 [API Eq. 3.2.5-5]
𝐷𝐷
2 2
�𝑓𝑓𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 + 𝑓𝑓𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏
𝑓𝑓𝑎𝑎 [API Eq. 3.3.1-2]
+ ≤ 1.0
0.6𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦 𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏
Members subjected to combined axial tension, bending, and hydrostatic pressure are checked
for the following condition:
where,
𝑓𝑓ℎ
𝐵𝐵 = (𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆ℎ )
𝐹𝐹ℎ𝑐𝑐
2 2
2 2
�𝑓𝑓𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 + 𝑓𝑓𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏
𝑓𝑓𝑎𝑎 [API Eq. 3.3.1-2]
+ ≤ 1.0
0.6𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦 𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏
where,
12𝜋𝜋 2 𝐸𝐸
𝐹𝐹𝑒𝑒′ = [AISC H1]
23(𝐾𝐾𝐾𝐾 ⁄𝑟𝑟)2
The reduction factors, Cmx and Cmy are calculated according to AISC H1.
𝑓𝑓
If 𝐹𝐹𝑎𝑎 ≤ 0.15, the previous two conditions are substituted by the following condition:
𝑎𝑎
2 2
+ 𝑓𝑓𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏
𝑓𝑓𝑎𝑎 �𝑓𝑓𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 [API Eq. 3.3.1-3]
+ ≤ 1.0
𝐹𝐹𝑎𝑎 𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏
Members subjected to combined axial compression, bending, and hydrostatic pressure are
checked for the following conditions:
𝑓𝑓ℎ
𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆ℎ ≤ 1.0 [API Eq. 3.3.4-2]
𝐹𝐹ℎ𝑐𝑐
where,
𝐹𝐹𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑥
F𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 =
𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑥𝑥
𝐹𝐹ℎ𝑒𝑒
𝐹𝐹ℎ𝑎𝑎 =
𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆ℎ
This chapter provides the details of the joint punching load check algorithms that are used for
tubular joints in accordance with API RP 2A-WSD Sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.2.
API RP 2A-WSD allows the joints to be designed on the basis of punching shear or nominal
loads in the braces. Both methods are available and documented in the following sections.
d Brace diameter, in
D Chord diameter, in
g Gap distance, in
t Brace thickness, in
T Chord thickness, in
θ Angle measured from the chord to the brace
Joint Geometry 9
Steel Frame Design API RP 2A-WSD 21st Joint Design
Brace
t
g Brace
T Chord
θ
D
𝑑𝑑 𝐷𝐷 𝑡𝑡
𝛽𝛽 = 𝛾𝛾 = 𝜏𝜏 =
𝐷𝐷 2𝑇𝑇 𝑇𝑇
where f is the nominal axial, in-plane bending, or out-of-plane bending stress. The acting shear
is kept separate for each stress type.
𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦
𝑣𝑣𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 = 𝑄𝑄𝑞𝑞 𝑄𝑄𝑓𝑓 ≤ 0.4𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦 [API Eq. 4.3.1-2]
0.6𝛾𝛾
The chord load factor, Qf, can be automatically calculated or user input. When automatically
calculated it is taken as 1.0 when all extreme fiber stresses in the chord are tensile, otherwise it
is defined as:
where,
̅ 2 + 𝑓𝑓𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼
�𝑓𝑓𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 ̅ 2 + 𝑓𝑓𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂
̅2
𝐴𝐴 =
0.6𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦
Table 2 – Factor, Qq
Brace Action
Joint Class Axial Axial In-plane Out-of-plane
Tension Compression Bending Bending
K overlap 1.8
0.3
for 𝛽𝛽 > 0.6
𝑄𝑄𝛽𝛽 = �𝛽𝛽(1 − 0.833𝛽𝛽) [API Table 4.3.1-1]
1.0 for 𝛽𝛽 ≤ 0.6
2 2
𝑣𝑣𝑝𝑝 𝑣𝑣𝑝𝑝
� � +� � ≤ 1.0 [API Eq. 4.3.1-3a]
𝑣𝑣𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 𝑣𝑣𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂
2 2
𝑣𝑣𝑝𝑝 2 𝑣𝑣𝑝𝑝 𝑣𝑣𝑝𝑝
� � + arcsin�� � +� � ≤ 1.0 [API Eq. 4.3.1-3b]
𝑣𝑣𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝜋𝜋 𝑣𝑣𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 𝑣𝑣𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂
where the arcsin term is in radians. The subscripts AX, IPB, and OPB correspond to axial, in-
plane bending, and out-of-plane bending, respectively.
𝑃𝑃𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝
≤ 1.0 [API 4.3.2]
𝑃𝑃 ⊥
where Pper is the brace axial load component perpendicular to the chord, defined as:
𝑃𝑃𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 = 𝑃𝑃 sin 𝜃𝜃
𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦 𝑇𝑇 2
𝑃𝑃𝑎𝑎 = 𝑄𝑄𝑢𝑢 𝑄𝑄𝑓𝑓 [API Eq. 4.3.1-4a]
1.7 sin 𝜃𝜃
𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦 𝑇𝑇 2
𝑀𝑀𝑎𝑎 = 𝑄𝑄𝑢𝑢 𝑄𝑄𝑓𝑓 (0.8𝑑𝑑) [API Eq. 4.3.1-4b]
1.7 sin 𝜃𝜃
The chord load factor, Qf, can be automatically calculated or user input. When automatically
calculated it is taken as 1.0 when all extreme fiber stresses in the chord are tensile, otherwise it
is defined as per Section 3.2.2 above.
The ultimate strength factor, Qu, is determined based on API Table 4.3.1-2.
Table 3 – Factor, Qu
Brace Action
The geometric factor, Qβ, and the gap factor, Qg, are defined in Section 3.2.2 above.
𝑀𝑀 2 𝑀𝑀 2
� � +� � ≤ 1.0 [API Eq. 4.3.1-5a]
𝑀𝑀𝑎𝑎 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 𝑀𝑀𝑎𝑎 𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂
𝑃𝑃 2 𝑀𝑀 2 𝑀𝑀 2
� � + arcsin�� � + � � ≤ 1.0 [API Eq. 4.3.1-5b]
𝑃𝑃𝑎𝑎 𝜋𝜋 𝑀𝑀𝑎𝑎 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 𝑀𝑀𝑎𝑎 𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂
where the arcsin term is in radians. The subscripts AX, IPB, and OPB correspond to axial, in-
plane bending, and out-of-plane bending, respectively.
𝑃𝑃𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝
≤ 1.0 [API 4.3.2]
𝑃𝑃 ⊥
where Pper is the brace axial load component perpendicular to the chord, defined as:
𝑃𝑃𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 = 𝑃𝑃 sin 𝜃𝜃
𝑙𝑙1
𝑃𝑃 ⊥= �𝑃𝑃𝑎𝑎 sin 𝜃𝜃 � + (2𝑣𝑣𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑡𝑡𝑤𝑤 𝑙𝑙2 ) [API Eq. 4.3.2-2]
𝑙𝑙
These supplements include changes to the joint punching checks as described in the following
sections.
This chapter provides the details of the API RP 2A-WSD 21st Supplements 2 (American
Petroleum Institute, 2005) and 3 (American Petroleum Institute, 2007), released in 2005 and
2007, respectively, which are considered when the supplement option is set to include these.
𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦 𝑇𝑇 2
𝑃𝑃𝑎𝑎 = 𝑄𝑄𝑢𝑢 𝑄𝑄𝑓𝑓 [API Eq. 4.3-1a]
𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹 sin 𝜃𝜃
𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦 𝑇𝑇 2 𝑑𝑑
𝑀𝑀𝑎𝑎 = 𝑄𝑄𝑢𝑢 𝑄𝑄𝑓𝑓 [API Eq. 4.3-1b]
𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹 sin 𝜃𝜃
𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝑃𝑃𝑐𝑐 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝑀𝑀𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖
𝑄𝑄𝑓𝑓 = �1 + 𝐶𝐶1 � � − 𝐶𝐶2 � � − 𝐶𝐶3 𝐴𝐴2 � [API Eq. 4.3-2]
𝑃𝑃𝑦𝑦 𝑀𝑀𝑝𝑝
14
Steel Frame Design API RP 2A-WSD 21st Supplements 2 and 3
2 2 0.5
𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝑃𝑃𝑐𝑐 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝑀𝑀𝑐𝑐
𝐴𝐴 = �� � +� � � [API Eq. 4.3-3]
𝑃𝑃𝑦𝑦 𝑀𝑀𝑝𝑝
where the safety factor, FS = 1.20 where the 1/3 increase is applicable. Pc is the nominal axial
load and Mc is the nominal bending resultant in the chord.
2 2
𝑀𝑀𝑐𝑐 = �𝑀𝑀𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 + 𝑀𝑀𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 [API 4.3.4]
The coefficients, C1, C2, and C3, are determined based on API Table 4.3-2.
Joint Type C1 C2 C3
K axial 0.2 0.2 0.3
T&Y axial 0.3 0 0.8
X axial 𝛽𝛽 ≤ 0.9 0.2 0 0.5
X axial 𝛽𝛽 = 1.0 -0.2 0 0.2
All joints moment 0.2 0 0.4
The ultimate strength factor, Qu, is determined based on API Table 4.3-1.
Table 5 – Factor, Qu
Brace Action
0.3
for 𝛽𝛽 > 0.6
𝑄𝑄𝛽𝛽 = �𝛽𝛽(1 − 0.833𝛽𝛽) [API Table 4.3.1-1]
1.0 for 𝛽𝛽 ≤ 0.6
Joint Design 15
Steel Frame Design API RP 2A-WSD 21st Supplements 2 and 3
𝜙𝜙 = 𝑡𝑡 𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦 ⁄�𝑇𝑇𝐹𝐹𝑦𝑦 �
𝑃𝑃 𝑀𝑀 2 𝑀𝑀
� �+� � +� � ≤ 1.0 [API Eq. 4.3-5]
𝑃𝑃𝑎𝑎 𝑀𝑀𝑎𝑎 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 𝑀𝑀𝑎𝑎 𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜
The subscripts IPB and OPB correspond to in-plane bending and out-of-plane bending,
respectively.
𝑃𝑃𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝
≤ 1.0 [API 4.3.2]
𝑃𝑃 ⊥
where Pper is the brace axial load component perpendicular to the chord, defined as:
𝑃𝑃𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 = 𝑃𝑃 sin 𝜃𝜃
𝑙𝑙1
𝑃𝑃 ⊥= �𝑃𝑃𝑎𝑎 sin 𝜃𝜃 � + (2𝑣𝑣𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑡𝑡𝑤𝑤 𝑙𝑙2 ) [API Eq. 4.3.2-2]
𝑙𝑙
Joint Design 16
5 References
American Institute of Steel Construction. (1989). Manual of Steel Construction - Allowable Stress Design
(9th ed.). Chicago, Illinois, USA: American Institute of Steel Construction.
American Petroleum Institute. (2000). Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing
Fixed Offshore Platforms - Working Stress Design (21st ed.). Washington, District of Columbia,
USA: API Publishing Services.
American Petroleum Institute. (2005). RP 2A-WSD Errata and Supplement 2 (21st ed.). Washington,
District of Columbia, USA: API Publishing Services.
American Petroleum Institute. (2007). RP 2A-WSD Errata and Supplement 3 (21st ed.). Washington,
District of Columbia, USA: API Publishing Services.
17