Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Gantry Girder Design Example

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 17

Class Room Teaching on an Undergraduate Topic : Design of Gantry Girder using

built-up-sections

Prepared by

Dr. Arghya Ghosh


B. E. (Civil Engineering) – Jadavpur University
M. E. (Structural Engineering) – Jadavpur University
Ph. D. (Engineering) – Jadavpur University
Applications of Gantry Girder
Arrangement of Gantry Girder in Factory Shed
Arrangement of Gantry Girder in Factory Shed
Loads on Gantry Girder
Problem statement on Design of Gantry Girder using built-up-sections.
Rail height = 145
600×40
• Truss column spacing = @ 5m c/c
40
• Gantry girder span = 15m B A
190×40 457.14
• Maximum load per wheel = 420 kN (assumed) 190×40
• Wheel base distance = 4.75m
Elastic N.A.
• Weight of crab = 140 kN
1200×8

1200
• Lifting load = 500 kN
• Wheels per girder = 2
8 822.86
• Crane span = 40m
• Total weight of crane = 400kN
• Minimum approach distance = 1.2m C
40
460×40
Crab + Lifting load = (140 + 500) kN = 640 kN 640 kN
1.2 m 400 kN (Total)
Maximum wheel load = RA = 200 + 640(40 – 1.2)/40 = 820.8 kN

Maximum load per wheel = 820.8/2 = 410.4 = 420 kN (assumed) 40 m
RA RB

Self weight of girder = Total load on girder X span (m)/180


= 420 × 2 × 15/180 = 70 kN = 70/15 kN/m = 4.67 kN/m.
420 kN 420 kN
4.75m 4.67 kN/m

Arrangement of maximum LLSF: 15 m


RA RB
Maximum LLSF = 420 + 420(15 – 4.75)/15 = 707 kN.
Considering 25% impact for EOT crane, LLSF = 1.25 × 707 = 884 kN [Cl. 6.3.a of IS: 875 (II) – 1987]
Shear force due to 70 kN of DL = 70/2 = 35 kN
So, Total SF = 884 + 35 = 919 kN.
Arrangement of maximum LLBM: 4.75/2 = 2.375m

420 kN 420 kN 4.67 kN/m (DL)


4.75/4 = 1.19m

6.31 m X
7.5 m 7.5 m
15 m
C.L.
420  42015  6.31  2.375  6.31  2231.47kN  m
Maximum live load bending moment =
15
Maximum live load bending moment with impact = 1.25 ×2231.47 = 2790 kN – m
Maximum dead load bending moment at the section of maximum LLBM
= 35 × 6.31 – 4.67 × 6.312/2 = 128 kN – m
Total maximum bending moment = 2790 + 128 = 2918 kN – m
Transverse load per wheel = (1/4)[(1/10)(140+500)] = 16 kN [due to braking of crab unit; Cl. 6.3.c.1 of IS: 875(II)]
Maximum transverse SF = (16/420)×707 = 27 kN
Maximum transverse BM = (16/420)×2232 = 86 kN – m.

Sectional properties:
Distance of
First area
C.G. from I = I0 + Ad2
Section Area, A (mm2) moment I0 (mm4) d (mm) Ad2 (mm4)
bottom (mm4)
(mm3)
(mm)
600×40 24000 1260 3024×104 320×104 437.14 4.59×109 4.59×109

190×40 7600 1220 927.2×104 2286.33×104 397.14 1.2×109 1.21×109

190×40 7600 1220 927.2×104 2286.33×104 397.14 1.2×109 1.21×109

1200×8 9600 640 614.4×104 115200×104 182.86 0.32×109 0.33×109

460×40 18400 20 36.8×104 213.33×104 802.86 11.86×109 11.86×109


Ixx =
Σ 67200 5529.6×104
19.2×109

y
 Ay 5529.6 10

4
 822.86mm; ryy 
I yy
 183mm I yy
compression  flange
 1.91 109 mm 4

wholesec tion A
A 67200
ryy  221mm
compression  flange

1 1 1 1 
I yy   40  6003   40  4603   1200 83  2   190 403  190 40  2802   2.24  109 mm 4
whole sec tion 12 12 12 12 
Design:

y=149
 Plastic N. A.

1131


Y
Capacity Md = 1.0 × 7.856 × 106 × 209.1 N – mm = 1643 kN – m
Limiting bending moment developed = 1.5 × 86 = 129 kN – m << 1643 kN – m (O.K.)
Now, interaction check: (cl. 9.3.1.1, pg 70)
Now, N = 1.5 × 42 = 63 KN; Nd = Agfy / γm0 =14050.9 kN [since, Ag = 67200 mm2, fy = 230 Mpa, γm0 = 1.1 (Table
5, pg 30)]
N/Nd + My/Mdy + Mz/Mdz = (63/14050.9) + (4377/5952) + (129/1643) = 0.818 < 1.0 (O.K.)
Steel grade used here as E250 (Fe410W)A, as tw = 8 mm and fy = 250 Mpa, so, εf = (250/fy)0.5 = 1.0 [from Table 1]

From Cl. 8.6.1.2 of IS: 800 – 2007, pg 64; d/tw =1200/8 = 150 < 345 (εf )2 = 345.
So, compression flange buckling will not occur.
Now, refer, Cl. 8.7.4, pg 67; Fw = (b1+n2)twfyw/ γm0
Let, b1 = 200 mm, n2 = 2 × 2.5 × 40 = 200
Local capacity of web at connection = Fw = (200+200) × 8 × 250/1.1 = 727.3 × 103 N = 727.3 kN
Factored reaction = 1.5 × 919 = 1379 kN > 727 kN
So, end stiffeners will be required.

150

150
20 tw= 20 × 8
40 = 160

 25

 75

75

20 tw= 20 × 8 = 160 20 tw= 20 × 8


= 160


Check for deflection:
From Cl.8.6.1., pg 63, c = 600 mm and d = 1200 mm.

Here, C < d; d/tw = 1200/8 = 150 < 270 εw = 270 × 1.0 = 270
So, deflection is O.K.
Thank You.

You might also like