Spring Extension Lab Report
Spring Extension Lab Report
Spring Extension Lab Report
this lab report will discuss the experiment investigating Hooke’s law by observing the effect
of exerted force on the extension of a spring. Through the relationship between the force
exerted and the extension of the spring, the spring constant can be calculated using Hooke’s
Law. The graph of the relationship between the two factors can also be used to find the
elastic potential energy using the equation PE = 1/2(kx^2). According to Hooke’s Law, the
extension of the force caused by the exerted force is proportional to the exerted force and
the equation of Hooke’s law is written as Fₛ = kx (spring force = spring constant multiplied
by extension of the spring). k, the spring constant, “is a measure of the stiffness of a spring
up to its limit of proportionality or elastic limit.”1 During the experiment, different known
masses will be hung below the spring, pulling the spring downwards. This will be the
measure of force as mass is a factor of gravitational force based on Newton’s second law of
motion where force = mass multiplied by acceleration. In this case, the acceleration will be
the acceleration due to gravity (10m/s^2).
Research question: What is the effect of the force applied on the extension of the spring?
Hypothesis: it is predicted that as the force applied on the spring increases, the extension of
the spring also increases. The equation of Hooke’s law is written as Fₛ = kx (spring force =
spring constant multiplied by extension of the spring). the spring constant depends on the
qualities of the specific spring and remains constant up to the limit of proportionality. If the
spring constant remains constant, the equation shows that the force exerted on the spring
would be proportional to the spring extension and has a linear relationship. If the spring
constant equals to 1, the force would equal to the spring extension. Hence, the increase of
force exerted would equal to the spring extension.
Variables:
Apparatus:
1 x retort stand
1 x clamp
1 x spring
2 x 30cm long ruler
1 x 0.05kg mass hanger
11 x 0.05kg masses
Method:
1) Place the ruler vertically next to the spring and measure the length of the spring
before any additional masses are placed
2) Attach the 0.05kg mass hanger with an additional 0.05kg mass (total of 0.1kg mass
added) and measure the length of the spring
3) Repeat step 2 with 2 0.05kg masses for 5 more times
4) Repeat step 1 to 3 for 2 more trials
Diagram:
Calculations:
Below you will find the calculations for the weight of 100g pulling on the spring.
The initial length of the spring shown above is the length of the spring without any weights
pulling on the spring.
Force applied to the spring: mass x acceleration due to gravity
=0.1kg x 10m/s^2 (the acceleration of gravity of Earth) = 1N
Extension of the spring: final length – initial length = 19.6cm – 17.6cm = 2cm
Average extension of the spring: (2+1.5+1.4)/3 = 1.6cm
Uncertainty of the extension of the spring: (2-1.4)/2= 0.3cm
Graph Analysis
force applied on the spring (N) vs average extension of the
spring (cm)
7
6
f(x) = 0.350240980768331 x + 0.534626362828132
force applied on the spring (N)
R² = 0.998687139447984
5
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
average extension of the spring (cm)
As the graph is made to find the spring constant and the elastic potential energy stored in
the spring, the force applied on the spring was placed on the y-axis and the average
extension of the spring was placed on the x-axis.
The graph above shows that the correlation between the force applied on the spring and
the average extension is strong, positive, and linear for the data points studied. The linear
best-fit line has an equation of y = 0.3502x + 0.5346, which means that as the extension of
the spring increases by 1, the force exerted on the spring increases by 0.35. The R 2 value of
this graph is 0.9987, meaning that the best-fit line is a reliable representation of the data
which I have collected.
As the spring constant is the force exerted on the spring divided by the extension of the
spring, the spring constant would be the value of the gradient of the linear best-fit line
shown on the graph above. Hence, the spring constant is 0.35N/cm. as the equation of
elastic potential energy stored is PE = 1/2(kx^2) (k is the spring constant value and x is the
displacement/extension of the spring), the elastic potential energy stored in the spring
would be ½ (0.3502*15.8^2)=43.71J.
The aim of the experiment was to investigate the correlation between the force exerted on
the spring and the extension of the spring and using the processed data to find the spring
constant and the elastic potential energy of the spring. To find the correlation between the
force exerted on the spring and the extension of the spring, the length of the spring with
different known masses hung below, which were changed by a constant of 0.1kg, were
measured and recorded. After the data of the correlation between the masses hung on the
spring and the lengths of the spring was collected, the data was processed where the
masses were converted to weight and the initial length was subtracted from the final length
to find the extension of the spring. This data was used to determine the spring constant and
elastic potential energy stored.
The data which I have collected in this experiment strongly supports my hypothesis, since as
the mass hung on the spring increases, the length of the spring increases, therefore the
extension of the spring increases as the force applied on the spring increases and in my
hypothesis, I stated that as the force applied on the spring increases, the extension of the
spring also increases.
Although there were no limitations in the data analysis, there were some limitations of
human error in the experiment such as the inaccurate readings of the length of the spring
due to the misalignment of the ruler on the spring and short rulers placed one on top of
another vertically.
However, the uncertainty value in the raw data table were relatively small, meaning that the
trials had been controlled and the measurements were accurate to a large extent.
Furthermore, the R2 value was high with a value of 0.9987, meaning that the best-fit line of
the graph was a reliable representation of my data.
Evaluation
Although the R2 value of the data collected was high and the uncertainty value was relatively
small, there were several limitations and human errors during the experiment which may
have affected the data collected.