PHYS3200Y
PHYS3200Y
PHYS3200Y
100
80
τ [P a] 60
40
20
0 100 200 300 400 500
γ̇ [s− ]
(a)
2.0
log G0 , G00 [P a]
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
(b)
Figure 1: a) Shows stress vs strain rate of carbopol where the black crosses represent the experi-
mental values and the blue line represents the Hershel-Bulkley Model fit. b) Shows the value of G’
and G” as a function of the deformation of the fluid. The red crosses represent G’ and the blue
crosses represent G”.
From 1a we can etxract the values of the yield stress, the consistency index and the flow index
of carbopol. The values extracted are
Name & Symbol Value Units
Yield Stress τ0 24 Pa
Consistency Index K 4.23 Pa·sn
Flow Index n 0.49 -
From Fig.1b we can see that after 10% deformation, signals the end of the linear elastic regime.
1
Single Bubble Oscillations
0.0002115 0.000160
0.000158
Radius [m]
0.0002110
0.000156
0.0002105 0.000154
0.000152
0.000150
0.000167
Radius [m]
0.000148 0.000166
0.000165
0.000146
0.000164
Figure 2
0.07
Oscillation Amplitude [%]
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
Figure 3
p
ρ0 R02
ζ= p (1)
4π π 2 (f02 − f 2 ) + β 2 f 2
2(3κ−1)Γ
3κp0 + R0 + 4G
f02 = (2)
4π 2 ρR02
2
We measure the resonance curve of bubbles in the linear regime. The graph shows a good agree-
ment between the experimental oscillation amplitudes measured at a constant pressure amplitude,
which are represented as black crosses in Fig.3, and the model predicted by Eq.1 and Eq.2, whose
fit is given by the red line in Fig.3. We can then extract, from the graph, the values of of the
pressure amplitude p and the damping parameter β. We retrieve p = 3.2 kPa and β = 6415.4.
Since we conducted this experiment at a constant pressure amplitude of 45.76 mV, we can say that
3.3 kPa ⇔ 45.76 mV.
0.00027
0.000290
0.00026
Distance between Bubbles (m)
0.00025
0.000286
0.00024
0.000284
0.00023
0.000282
0.00022
0.000280
0.00021
0.000278
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
Time (s) Time (s)
(a) (b)
Plotted in Fig.4 is the distance between two different bubble pairs as a function of time. We
have defined the distance between bubble pairs to be the distance between their centres. Fig.4a
demonstrates an attractive force between a bubble pair, where their initial separation is 2.7 x 10−4
m and their radii are 9.3 x 10−5 m and 9.9 x 10−4 m. Fig.4b indicates a repulsive force between
the bubble pair, where their initial separation is 2.7 x 10−4 m and their radii are 11.5 x 10−5 m
and 8.8 x 10−5 m.
Fig.5 plots the oscillations of two bubbles in different bubble pairs and the secondary Bjerknes
forces as a function of time. The oscillations of the bubbles tell us we are still in the linear regime.
From Fig.5a we see that magnitude of the secondary Bjerknes force is comparable to the obtained
value of the yield stress of carbopol.
3
×10−5
0.000120
9.6
0.000118
9.4
Radius [m]
0.000116
Radius [m]
rmax
9.2
rmin
0.000114
9.0 0.000112
rmax
0.000110
8.8 rmin
×10−5
8.95
0.000102 8.90
0.000100 8.85
Radius [m]
Radius [m]
rmax
0.000098 8.80 rmin
0.000096 8.75
τ0 = 24
−6.9
−10
−7.0
−20 −7.1
−30 −7.2
−7.3
−40
−7.4
−50
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
Time [s− ] Time [s− ]
(a) (b)
Figure 5: Plotted are the oscillations of two bubbles in different bubble pairs and the secondary
Bjerknes forces as a function of time.