Method of Sections
Method of Sections
Method of Sections
METHOD OF SECTION
When one desires to find the unknown forces in only a few bars, then the method of sections is often the preferred method. This method also follows the same steps pursued in any Statics problem, but differs from the method of joints in the choice of subsystems. When applying this method we make an imaginary cut through the truss dividing it into two parts, which are referred to as sections. The cut divides some of the bars into portions, but never runs through a joint. When drawing free body diagrams of a section of the truss, we must represent the load exerted by one portion of the bar on the other portion of the bar. Since each portion must be in equilibrium, the direction and sense of that internal force is consistent with the forces exerted by the pins on the bar. The internal force is similar to the tension in a cable, except that truss members could be either in tension or compression.
EXAMPLE: Drawing and Solving for a Given Section 1 Here is the truss; only forces in bars CE and CF are to be found. All dimensions are in feet.
Each section forms a planar rigid body. In this sense it is like the 2-D subsystems considered in unit "Single Body", with three independent equations of equilibrium, for example two force equations and one moment equation. To visualize it, let us draw only the outline shape of the subsystem the section as shown below.
Do we need to analyze both sections, and/or the truss as a whole? Remember that we are interested only in forces CE and CF.
Say that forces in bars EG and FG are needed. If we cut the truss as shown below, we would only have two unknown bar forces. Could the two unknown bar forces possibly satisfy three equations of equilibrium?
From the FBD, you can see that all forces pass through the joint G. So, summation of moments about that point is trivially satisfied. In fact, for this choice of cut, the method of sections is equivalent to the method of joints applied to joint G. Observation: * To form a solvable section cut through no more than 3 bars with unknown forces * In this example, the cut required to reveal the desired forces in the bars cuts the truss into two sections, such that one of them does not interact with any supports. In such cases only one subsystem (the section with no reaction forces) can be used to find the desired unknown bar forces
EXAMPLE: Drawing and Solving for a Given Section 2 In this truss, all applied forces are in kN. Only forces in bars CD, IJ, and DI are to be found. Neighboring joints are separated by 3 m horizontally (e.g., A and B) and 4 m vertically (e.g., B and H).
Now you will draw the free body diagram for a section. We try to solve for the unknown forces in the bars, we find that neither section is solvable there are 4 unknowns on the left section, and 5 on the right section. Unlike with the prior EXAMPLE 1, here the whole truss has to be solved first for the tension in the cable or for the pin reactions.
Let us use the left section to find the unknowns, since it has fewer forces acting on it. As you should remember from previous modules, we try to simplify the solution process by choosing an equilibrium equation in which the desired unknown is the only unknown. For example, we could take moments about a point through which many forces pass. This moment center can be at any point, either on or off the subsystem. Observation: * The cut required to reveal the desired forces in the bars cuts the truss into two sections, both of which interact with supports. In such a case neither subsystem is solvable by itself. * Two subsystems were needed: one of the truss as a whole to find support reactions, and then one section to find the desired bar forces. We have chosen to solve the left section because it has fewer forces acting on it * It is enough to find just the unknown reaction that is on the FBD of the section chosen as the subsystem, in this example the tension T, since the left section was chosen for analysis * Note that to find IJ we use as moment center point D, a point not in the left section, since this is the point through which the line of action of the remaining two unknowns passes Summary * The section interacts with the remaining parts of the cut bars, and may also interact with supports. Commonly, the unknown forces in the bars are assumed to be in tension. * Avoid common mistakes: do not include internal forces in free body diagrams (when two connected members are both part of the subsystem, the interactions at that connection are "internal to the subsystem") * Strictly obey Newton's 3rd Law, drawing equal and opposite interactions on the two sections, in case both are drawn * Three independent equations of equilibrium can be imposed on each section, so the unknown forces in three bars could be determined from equilibrium of a section, provided that all the other forces are known (support reactions might need to be found first e.g., from the equilibrium of the whole truss)
Consider these possible sections and revisit your solution earlier if it was not right. Look below for a discussion of the merits of these sections. Discussion on the merits of these sections Which section is preferable to find the forces in bars GI and GH? For Section a, one would need to find the support reactions at A and D analyzing the whole truss first. But supports do not interact with section b, so you should choose section b. To efficiently find GI, you could not use just one force summation since the other unknown forces GH and DH have horizontal and vertical components and so they would also contribute. Likewise, you could not find GH with just one force summation since GI also has a horizontal component. That leaves you with the moment summation. For a single moment equation, try to find a point through which the other forces pass, but the desired force does not. GH and DH pass through H, so it could be used to find GI. GI and DH pass through a point 3 m above K, which could be found. Moments about that point off the truss could be used to find GH.
Look below to see the equations used to find GI and GH. Equations used to find GI and GH
EXAMPLE: Solving Truss Problems with Method of Sections 2 Here is the same truss.
Consider these possible sections and revisit your solution earlier if it was not right. Discussion on the merits of these sections Which section is preferable to find the force in bars FG? The reaction at one support appears in the FBD of each section. So, no matter which one you would choose you would have to first find reaction(s) from the analysis of the whole truss. Sections d and f only
Consider these possible sections and revisit your solution earlier if it was not right. Discussion on the merits of these sections Which section is preferable to find the force in bar DK? The reaction at one support appears in the FBD of each section. The horizontal reaction is obviously zero, so each support has one unknown. If we think ahead to what equation we would use to find DK, we would choose moments about point G, since the other forces DE and JK act through G. This argues in favor of section b, since the reaction at G would not contribute to the moment about G anyway. Equations used to find DK
Find the force in bar DJ. There is no single section from which this bar force can be found. If you have some ideas, you can attempt to solve this entirely on your own. But, we will help point the way below. The correct answer is DJ = 86.7 kN Tension Solution to Example: Solving Truss Problems with Method of Sections 4 We clearly need to consider more than one subsystem (in addition to using the whole truss to find support reactions). One subsystem needs to cut through DJ. Sections c and d are such subsystems. Section c has too many unknown forces in bars, since it cuts through 4 of them. Notice that section d is equivalent to joint J there are 3 unknowns, but just 2 equations Can one of the unknowns acting on sections c or d, (besides DJ) be found from another subsystem, which in turn would enable you to find DJ from either section c or d?
If you have enough of a start to complete this problem, try to do so. If you want more discussion, continue to the section below. Discussion on the merits of these sections For Section c, if we took moments about A, then IJ and DE do not contribute, but DJ (desired) and DK do. So, we would need to find DK from a different subsystem.
Using Section d: After finding JK section d would become solvable. Using the same section b that you used to find DK in example 6, you could find JK by taking moments about D (through which DK and DE pass), but we need support reaction Gy.
You can see that the first method was more efficient, although we also need to recognize that DK was found earlier. Summary When using the method of sections: * Cut through bars with desired unknown forces * To have a solvable subsystem do not cut through more than 3 bars with unknown forces * If the cut required to reveal the desired forces in the bars cuts the truss into two sections, such that one of them does not interact with any supports, then use the section with no reaction forces to find the desired unknown bar forces * If the cut required to reveal the desired forces in the bars cuts the truss into two sections, such that both of them interact with supports, then neither subsystem is solvable by itself. Analyze the truss as a whole to find support reactions (or just those needed), and then one section to find the desired bar forces.