Cristina Cordos
Romanian Academy, Iasi Branch, Institute of Archaeology Iasi, Department Member
- Archaeometry, Ethnoarchaeology, Lithic Technology, Neanderthals (Palaeolithic Archaeology), Paleolithic Europe, Upper Paleolithic, and 11 moreHunter-Gatherers (Anthropology), Hunter-Gatherer Archaeology, Middle Paleolithic, Ancient History and Archaeology, Human Evolution, Paleolithic, Hunter-Gatherers, Animal domestication, Archaeology, Bronze Age Europe (Archaeology), and Rock Carvingsedit
Processing of osseous materials was an important component of the repertoire of technological innovations throughout the Palaeolithic. The study of hard animal materials assemblages therefore provides crucial information regarding hominin... more
Processing of osseous materials was an important component of the repertoire of technological innovations throughout the Palaeolithic. The study of hard animal materials assemblages therefore provides crucial information regarding hominin adaptational ranges and cultural evolution. In contrast to the wide array of studies published on this topic in western and central Europe, the Palaeolithic osseous industries from Romania received comparatively limited attention. The organic industry recovered from Cotu Miculinți, a Late Glacial Maximum (LGM) site located in the Prut Valley (northeastern Romania), provides a case at point. The present study proposes a throughout reassessment of the collection of osseous artifacts from this site, covering several key aspects – raw materials, chaîne opératoire, and the functionality of the assemblage – in an attempt of setting the site’s osseous industry into the wider context of LGM cultural adaptations in the area east of the Carpathians. The results of our analysis reveal an assemblage predominantly made of reindeer antler and document a standardization of the technical transformation scheme, by use of both segmentation and extraction. This resulted in the production of two types of blanks: segmentation produced massive pieces that were transformed into hammers or perforated batons, and extraction by grooving led to standardized rods on flat blanks used to produce barbed points or smoothers. The finished pieces were used in domestic activities (processing of hides, bark, and wood) and for hunting. The assemblage of osseous artifacts from Cotu Miculinți displays many features in common with contemporaneous sites in the area, in particular Cosăuți (Moldova), which is strongly indicative for a similar cultural and adaptive background.
Research Interests:
The Bistricioara-Lutărie III (BL III) Upper Paleolithic site belongs to the dense network of multilayered sites located along the Bistrița Valley, Eastern Romanian Carpathians. Its Gravettian layer with shouldered points (ca. 27 ka cal... more
The Bistricioara-Lutărie III (BL III) Upper Paleolithic site belongs to the dense network of multilayered sites located along the Bistrița Valley, Eastern Romanian Carpathians. Its Gravettian layer with shouldered points (ca. 27 ka cal BP) opens a succession of Gravettian and Epigravettian cultural layers covering the entire timespan of the Last Glacial Maximum. The layer preserves a consistent lithic assemblage almost entirely knapped in allogenous Cretaceous flint, together with poorly preserved faunal remains and in situ habitation/ occupation features. Chronologically, this assemblage fits well within what was defined as a specific cultural package i. e., the shouldered points horizon, generally framed between 29 and 27 ka cal BP. This also seems to apply to several archaeological layers at other multi-layered sites in the region, located along the Bistrița (Poiana Cireșului, Buda, and Lespezi), Prut (Mitoc Malu Galben) and Dniester (Molodova V and Doroshivtsi III) river valleys...
Research Interests:
A paper summarizing recent non-invasive investigations and excavations on a Bronze Age tell settlement in the Eastern Carpathian Basin. In print.... more
A paper summarizing recent non-invasive investigations and excavations on a Bronze Age tell settlement in the Eastern Carpathian Basin. In print. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339178356_The_Bronze_Age_Tell_Settlement_at_Toboliu_Bihor_County_Romania_A_Brief_Outline_of_Recent_Investigations DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28359.44966
Research Interests: Prehistoric Archaeology, Settlement Patterns, Bronze Age Europe (Archaeology), Prehistoric Settlement, Prehistoric Europe (Archaeology), and 5 moreFortified Settlements (Archaeology), Settlement archaeology, Prehistoric Archeology, Bronze Age of the Carpathian Basin, and Early Bronze Age Archaeology
Research Interests: Geography, Archaeology, Prehistoric Archaeology, Settlement Patterns, Bronze Age Europe (Archaeology), and 9 moreBronze Age Archaeology, Balkan prehistory, Fortified Settlements (Archaeology), Prehistory, Settlement archaeology, Bronze Age, Bronze Age of the Carpathian Basin, Bronze, and Human Settlement
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Stone artefacts are in many cases the sole survivors in Palaeolithic sites. Although an overwhelming percentage is represented by knapped lithics, other types of stone objects are also known, related to both common and rather special... more
Stone artefacts are in many cases the sole survivors in Palaeolithic sites. Although an overwhelming percentage is represented by knapped lithics, other types of stone objects are also known, related to both common and rather special contexts. Several such artefacts were revealed at Mitoc-Malu Galben over the years, consisting mostly of small stone hammers, as well as a spectacular incised stone pendant. In 2018, a new non-knapped stone artefact was discovered in the Gravettian III layer, showing several intriguing features which clearly point towards its usage. While detailed microscopic analyses are still underway, its size, shape and macroscopic traces might already offer some hints in regards to its function.
Research Interests:
Archaeological evidence is seldom straightforward, the way in which it reveals itself depending on a multitude of factors and variables. The age of the agents (creators of cultural material) may well be one of these variables, but in many... more
Archaeological evidence is seldom straightforward, the way in which it reveals itself depending on a multitude of factors and variables. The age of the agents (creators of cultural material) may well be one of these variables, but in many instances the discourse is solely centred on adults, while children are totally of partially ignored. The concept of archaeology of children reunites various approaches, centred on identifying the traces left by children in archaeological contexts, as well as on understanding the role and impact they had in past communities. Some of these approaches are mentioned here, in an attempt to raise awareness and challenge Romanian researchers to approach more often such issues.
Research Interests:
The archaeology of children has come a long way over the past decades and many related aspects were investigated, yielding significant results. However, worldwide the subject still remains a peripheral one and furthermore, if we exclude... more
The archaeology of children has come a long way over the past decades and many related aspects were investigated, yielding significant results. However, worldwide the subject still remains a peripheral one and furthermore, if we exclude the mentioning of children in funerary contexts, it was generally overlooked by Romanian archaeologists so far. Nevertheless, children represent an important segment of any society, past or present, not only in terms of percentage, but also if we consider their role as successors.