Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
How to cite this article in bibliograhies / References
JJ Igartua (2013): “Attitudinal impact and cognitive channeling of immigration stereotypes
through the news”, at Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 68.
Attitudinal impact and cognitive
channelling of immigration stereotypes
through the news
JJ Igartua [CV] [ ] [
] Universidad de Salamanca. jigartua@usal.es
Abstract
Introduction: Based on research on the framing effect and research on the treatment of immigration,
the processes of reception and impact of news about crime are analyzed. Method: We conducted two
experimental investigations in which participants were exposed to a news story and later filled in a
questionnaire with self-report scales. Two independent variables were manipulated: the mention of
protagonists’ national/ geographic origin in the news story and the involvement with the topic.
Results: The study indicates that when the involvement with the news story is low, the presence of
information about the nationality of the protagonist exerted an indirect effect through attitudinal
impact. However, when involvement is high, the indirect effect is explained by the activation of
trains of thought which influence the formation and/or reinforcement of negative beliefs about
immigration. Conclusions: The results are consistent with a dual model of news framing effects and
reinforce the recommendations made by some organisations about not reporting the nationality of the
protagonists of a criminal act in news programmes.
Keywords: News framing effect; group cue; involvement; immigration; experimental research;
mediational analysis.
Contents: 1. Introduction. 1.1. Mechanisms of framing effects. 1.2. Objectives and hypotheses. 2.
Study 1. 2.1. Method. 2.2. Results. 2.3. Conclusions. 3. Study 2. 3.1. Methods. 3.2. Results. 3.3.
Conclusions. 4. Conclusions and general discussion. 5. List of references. 6. Notes.
1. Introduction
The Audiovisual Council of Catalonia was perhaps the first Spanish organisation to outline the way
the media should report about immigration. The specific recommendations directed to media
professionals included two that are relevant to the context of the studies presented here: 1) emphasis
on references to issues such as the nationality or skin colour of the protagonists of news stories often
does not add relevant information to the story, is not strictly necessary to understand the event and,
instead, reinforces prejudices and acts as an implicit interpretation cue with negative or
condemnatory intentions, and 2) similarly, and without having to systematically renounce to
collective naming, it is not acceptable to associate an ethnic minority or a concrete group of
immigrants with a particular illegal activity, which can end up being considered by the audience
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 599
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
almost as an attribute or characteristic of the group in question [1]. Moreover, OBERAXE (the
Spanish Racism and Xenophobia Observatory) has also stated that associations between immigration
and crime and negative activities should be avoided (Sendín and Izquierdo, 2008).
The two experimental studies presented in this article reveal the mechanisms (attitudinal and
cognitive mediating processes) that explain the impact of the reference to the nationality of the
protagonists of a news story about a criminal act on people’s stereotypical beliefs about immigration,
taking as a reference the research on framing effects and the role of the peripheral cues in the
processing of journalistic information. The results from both studies allow us to advance a theoretical
model on the socio-cognitive effects of news framing (a dual model for news framing effects) and to
empirically support the recommendation of not mentioning the nationality of the protagonists in the
reporting of criminal acts.
1.1. Mechanisms of framing effects
Tankard (2001) argues that framing a news story involves: a) addressing an issue in a certain way or
from a certain perspective; b) setting an agenda of attributes; c) choosing certain keywords to make a
discourse; d) manipulating the salience of certain elements or traits (giving emphasis to some of
them); and e) formulating a central organising idea. Entman (1993), on the other hand, believes that
framing “is to select some aspects of the perceived reality and to make them more prominent in a
communicative text, in a way that promotes certain definitions of problems, causal interpretations,
moral assessments and/or recommendations for the treatment of the issue described” (p. 52). Other
authors have pointed out that the study of news framing (and its effects), is directly linked to the socalled second-level agenda setting theory (McCombs, López-Escobar and Llamas, 2000; McCombs
and Reynolds, 2002). From this perspective, news framing manipulate the salience of certain
elements or attributes with respect to an issue or event (McCombs and Reynolds, 2002). In short,
framing information in a news story is related to two basic operations: selecting and emphasising
words, expressions and images, to attach a point of view, a perspective or a certain angle to a news
story (de Vreese, 2003).
News frames can play different roles, and particularly act as dependent and independent variables
(de Vreese, 2003; Scheufele, 1999). First, understood as dependent variables, frames are contained in
the news and are the result of their processes of production. As independent variables, frames are
conceived as properties of the news texts, capable of affecting the processes of reception and the
impact of those news texts. This line of research is linked to framing effects analysis (Iyengar, 1991;
de Vreese, 2003; Price and Tewksbury, 1997; Scheufele, 2000). Scheufele (2000) points out that
news framing can influence people’s thoughts (in their cognitive responses) and, therefore, can
influence people’s perception of the subject matters addressed in a news story; they can also have a
considerable effect on the way of thinking about the social world and produce a change or an impact
on perceptions and attitudes through subtle alterations in the definition of a problem in a news story.
Finally, news framing may influence emotional responses or reactions, i.e. the way an issue is
represented in a news story will induce different emotions towards this issue (Gross and Brewer,
2007; Gross and D'Ambrosio, 2004; Igartua, Moral and Fernández, 2011).
The current debate in this field focuses on analysing the explanatory mechanisms of news framing
effects [2] (Igartua and Cheng, 2009; Price and Tewksbury, 1997; Scheufele, 2000). Matthes (2007)
indicates that most of the theories about framing effects have been based on the concept of
accessibility (memory-based model). However, framing effect theory also contends that this effect is
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 600
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
linked to the applicability of the knowledge that is activated during news reception, i.e. with the
activation of "trains of thought" that spontaneously influence the formation of attitudes and beliefs,
thanks to the emphasis put on certain attributes in the news story (on-line model) (Price and
Tewksbury, 1997; Price, Tewksbury and Powers, 1997). A third position considers that the framing
effect is linked to the processes of persuasion and, in this context, it has been proposed that this
effect may be ruled by the heuristic processing (Igartua and Cheng, 2009; Igartua, Moral and
Fernández, 2011; Perse, 2001; von Sikorski and Schierl, 2012). This means that the impact of news
framing would be related to the activation of cognitive processes that do not involve a
comprehensive analysis of information, i.e., with the activation of mental shortcuts and attitudinal
modelling processes, so that the implicit attitude in the news is automatically assimilated, without
causing a reflection or elaboration processes on individuals. Thus, it is considered that when people
are not particularly motivated to process information (which could be the default position, given the
low rates of information retention; Machill, Köhler and Waldhauser, 2007) the presence of peripheral
cues in the news message can condition the socio-cognitive effects.
Perse (2001) has indicated that the framing effect could be explained with the Elaboration Likelihood
Model (ELM), by Petty and Cacioppo (1986), based on peripheral processing. The ELM proposes
that two different routes are responsible for attitudinal change: a central processing route and a
peripheral processing route. The central route means that the receiver of the message tries to perform
a critical and thorough evaluation of the message. This kind of systematic processing takes place
when people faces contents that arouse great interest in them or contents with which people maintain
a high involvement because they are considered to be important issues. The main mechanism of
attitudinal change in this context is the amount and type of cognitive responses made by individuals
(what and how much is reflected upon during the processing of the message). On the other hand, the
peripheral processing route is superficial and automatic, and is based on peripheral cues (who says
what, how is this said, etc.) and is activated when individuals are exposed to low-involvement
messages, i.e. messages dealing with issues that do not arouse interest or are considered to be little
relevant from a personal point of view. In this context, the heuristic processing (which operates
through the peripheral route) refers to the application of simple decision-making rules over noncentral aspects of the message (for example, “if the news story is published by a quality newspaper,
instead of a tabloid, it is more likely that the news will be true and verified”).
A peripheral cue in the context of the news about immigration is the allusion to the nationality of
immigrants (group cue) (Brader, Valentino and Suhay, 2008). In this context, Igartua and Cheng
(2009) observed that the incidental inclusion of the nationality of immigrants (Moroccans in
comparison to Latin Americans), in the context of a news story about the consequences of
immigration for Spain, worsens prejudice and reinforces negative attitudes and beliefs towards
inmigrants in general. These results converge with studies on the role of (textual and visual) cues on
the ethnicity or nationality of the protagonists of the news stories in the activation of stereotypes
(e.g., Gilliam, Iyengar, Simon and Wright, 1996; Peffley, Shields and Williams, 2001). It has been
observed that the manipulation of the ethnicity of a suspect (African-American versus white) in the
context of a news story about crime influences concern for crime and attributions about its causes
(Gilliam et al., 1996) and distorts the assessment of the suspect (Peffley et al., 2001). From this
cognitive framework, it is considered that news have a cognitive influence because most of the times,
in the interaction with journalistic content, people operate with low motivation and processing
capacity. Under these conditions, the heuristic processing ends up being dominant (in comparison to
the systematic processing). Therefore, one the main effects of news consumption is that it facilitates
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 601
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
the access to certain information and, thereby, it stimulates a more superficial processing (through
the application of heuristics) of the social world (Perse, 2001).
But what happens when involvement with the subject matter of the news story is high? What role do
peripheral cues play in this context? Firstly, it should be argued that if news were processed in a
systematic way (via the central route) the effects of the peripheral cues (such as the reference to the
nationality or ethnicity of the news’ protagonists) would be little relevant, since what is really
important in this context is the amount and type of reflection, which is in turn determined by the
quality of the information contained in the news story. Thus, when there is a systematic processing of
information, the impact of news framing is explained by cognitive mediation; i.e., cognitive
responses will perform a mediating role. However, being highly involved with a subject matter does
not guarantee an objective processing of the information. According to the ELM, involvement with
the subject matter of a news story determines not only the degree or intensity of reflection (how
much is reflected during the exposure to the message), but also affects the direction of the reflection
(Petty, Priester and Wegener, 1994).
It has been noted that there may be two types of cognitive processing: objective and biased. The
objective cognitive processing implies that the individual will carry out a thorough and critical
analysis, taking into account the evidence presented in the message. This type of processing will be
guided by data (bottom-up processing) since it is assumed that elaboration is relatively unbiased. On
the other hand, biased cognitive processing will be triggered in circumstances where the assessment
of the evidence included in the message does not constitute a central element for the individual. In
this way, people process communication guided almost exclusively by the schema, the attitude or
prior knowledge on the subject and aim to maintain consistency in their belief system and to defend
their initial attitudes (top-down processing). From this point of view, it can be assumed that the
presence of a peripheral cue in the context of a news story about a criminal act (for example, the
revelation that criminals are immigrants or belong to certain country) would promote a skewed
cognitive processing, producing a process of cognitive channelling. In this way, the peripheral cues
can influence the direction of cognitive responses and these, in turn, can induce a greater impact on
opinions or beliefs.
1.2. Objectives and hypotheses
The main objective of the two studies presented here is to compare the differential effect of the
inclusion of information on the nationality of criminals (group cue) in a news story about a criminal
incident in people with low and high involvement with the reported event. It is assumed that the
framing effect can be explained by taking into account the same mechanisms that explain the attitude
impact caused by persuasive messages. Thus, the presence of peripheral cues is considered an
element that is, routinely, used to build news stories that link immigration with crime, to such an
extent that it has become a characteristic feature of this type of news framing of immigration. In this
context, it can be hypothesised that the effect of the reference to the nationality of the criminals in a
news story about a criminal incident could be explained by different mechanisms that depend on
individuals’ degree of involvement.
Personal involvement refers to the intrinsic importance that a particular issue or event has for a
person (Johnson & Eagly, 1990). If individuals believe that the issue addressed in a news story may
have important consequences for their own life, we are talking about a message with high
involvement. On the other hand, if the issue or event does not affect individuals, this message will
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 602
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
lack relevance. Given that involvement with a subject is a situational variable, its experimental
manipulation is possible. In the two research studies presented here, involvement has been
manipulated by changing the context in which the events were narrated in the news story: close and
high involvement (the criminal incident occurred in the same city in which the individual lives) or far
and low involvement (the incident took place in a distant city, part of another autonomous
community). This manipulation of the involvement through subtle alterations in the text is the usual
procedure used in persuasion research (Igartua, Cheng and Lopes, 2003; Petty and Cacioppo, 1986).
In this way, individuals exposed to a low-involvement news story "would be led" by its peripheral
cues (the reference to the nationality of the criminals), and it would have a greater impact on their
attitudes, beliefs and emotions towards immigrants. Based on this premise, the following hypotheses
were formulated:
H1: In a news story about a criminal act, the inclusion of information about the nationality of the
criminals (defined as immigrants) will stimulate a more negative attitude towards immigration only
when low involvement is induced in participants (study 1).
H2: In a news story about a criminal act, the presence of information about the nationality of the
criminals (defined as immigrants) will produce a greater degree of agreement with the negative and
stereotypical beliefs about the consequences of immigration only when low involvement is induced
in participants (study 1).
H3: In a news story about a criminal act, the presence of information about the nationality of the
criminals (defined as immigrants) will cause a greater experience of negative emotions towards
immigrants and lower intensity of positive emotions, only when low involvement is induced in
participants (study 1).
The second objective of both studies is to analyse the mechanisms or mediating processes that
explain the impact of the reference to the nationality of the protagonists of the news story in the
formation and/or reinforcement of stereotypical beliefs about immigrants. We expected the effect of
the reference to the nationality of the protagonists of the news story to be different among people
with low and high involvement with the subject matter of the news story. In people with low
involvement, the reference to the nationality of the protagonists of the news story will act as a
peripheral cue, so that it will trigger a negative attitude towards immigration and this attitude will be
associated in turn to a greater degree of agreement with the negative and stereotypical beliefs about
immigration. In contrast, in people with high involvement, the presence of this information will
distort the information processing, i.e., it will have an effect that is based on the activation of a
cognitive channelling process which will in turn produce greater agreement with the stereotypical
beliefs about immigration. In this sense, the following hypotheses were formulated:
H4: The effect of the reference to the nationality of the protagonists of the news story on the
stereotypical beliefs on immigration will be mediated by the attitudes towards immigration, but only
when the involvement with the subject of the news story is low (study 1).
H5: In a news story about a criminal act, the presence (versus absence) of information on the
nationality of the criminals (defined as immigrants) will have an effect of cognitive channelling and
will produce more critical cognitive responses to immigration, but only when the involvement with
the subject of the news story is high (study 2).
H6: The effect of the reference to the nationality of the protagonists of the news story on the
stereotypical beliefs on immigration will be mediated by the cognitive responses raised by the
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 603
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
reading of the news story, but only when the involvement with the subject of the news story is low
(study 2).
2. Study 1
2.1. Method
Study 1 consisted of an experimental investigation, involving 237 students from the Miguel de
Cervantes European University (Valladolid [3]). The average age of the participants was 20.95 years
(DT = 2.52; 18 to 36 years) and 47.3% of them were women.
We used a 2 x 2 between-subjects design, based on two experimental manipulations applied to a
news story about a criminal incident. The first independent variable was associated with the
manipulation of the group cue, i.e., the reference in the news story to the nationality of the
protagonists of the criminal incident, establishing two conditions: “the nationality of the criminals is
not mentioned” versus “the immigrant nature of the criminals is mentioned”. The second
independent variable was the involvement with the subject of the news story: low (the criminal event
took place in Barcelona) or high (the criminal event took place in Valladolid, the city of residence of
the study participants).
The dependent variables were evaluated by means of a split-ballot questionnaire. The study was
carried out in several classrooms of the Miguel de Cervantes European University of Valladolid.
Participants were randomised to the four experimental conditions. The cover of the administered
questionnaire included information about the objectives of the study. The second page included the
experimental news story which had the same headline in the four conditions: “Woman in critical
condition after being brutally attacked by two thieves who raided her home”. The news story used in
the study was based on a real story that had been published with the same headline in the print
version of El País newspaper on 18 June, 2006 [4] (only 5.5% of the participants stated that they had
already read the news story before). After the experimental news story was read, participants had to
answer the questionnaire including the dependent, manipulation-check, and control variables:
Emotions felt during the reading of the news story (Igartua et al., 2003). We used a scale consisting
of 10 items referring to different emotions (interest, joy, surprise, sadness, anger, disgust, contempt,
fear, shame and guilt). Participants had to indicate to what extent the reading of the news story had
made them feel these emotions, ranging from 1 (“nothing”) to 5 (“a lot”).
Evaluation of the news story. We used a semantic differential comprised of 9 bipolar 7- point scales
with antonyms in their extremes: "clear-confuse", "easy to reading-difficult to read", "deepsuperficial", "objective-biased", "complex-simple", "contextualised-out of context", "impreciserigorous", "attractive-repulsive" and "entertaining-boring".
Interest aroused by the news story. Participants were asked to "assess the degree of personal interest
aroused by the news story" (from 0 "no interest" to 10 "great interest").
Attitude towards immigration. Participants were asked: "As you know, all developed countries
receive immigrants. Do you think that, in general terms, immigration is more positive or more
negative for Spain?" (from 0 "very negative" to 10 "very positive").
Beliefs about the consequences of immigration. Participants were asked to indicate their degree of
agreement or disagreement (1 = totally disagree, 5 = full agreement) towards 8 claims about the
consequences of immigration in Spain (Cea d'Ancona, 2004; Igartua and Cheng, 2009): 1)
"immigrants carry out jobs that Spaniards do not want to perform"; 2) "Spain still needs immigrant
workers"; 3) “the increase in immigration contributes to the increase in crime"; "4) “a society
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 604
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
without immigrants will find it difficult to function and advance"; 5) "there is a close relation
between immigration and insecurity"; 6) "the increase in immigrants favours the country's
economy"; 7) "when I think about immigrants I think of all the problems they cause"; and 8) "in
general, immigrants are contributing to the country’s development". Principal components factor
analysis (varimax rotation) extracted two factors (69.94% of the variance). The first factor (items 1,
2, 4, 6 and 8) alluded to the belief that "immigration is a necessary contribution to the country"
(α=.85); the second factor (items 3, 5 and 7) referred to the belief that "immigration contributes to
the increase in crime and public insecurity" (α=.79).
Emotions felt towards immigrants. This scale is based on the scale of affective subtle prejudice
created by Navas, García, Rojas, Pumares and Cuadrado (2006). Participants were asked to state the
extent to what immigrants inspired the following emotions in them: fear, admiration, mistrust,
insecurity, sympathy, discomfort and indifference (from 1 "nothing" to 5 "a lot"). A principal
component factor analysis with varimax rotation, was carried out and extracted two factors
explaining 66.97% of the variance: a) negative emotions of fear, mistrust, insecurity, discomfort and
indifference (α=.81), and b) positive emotions of admiration and sympathy (α=.76).
Interest in the subject of immigration. Participants were asked: "how interested are you in the issue
of immigration?" (from 1 "nothing" to 5 "a lot"; M=3.66, DT=0.85).
Participation in discussions about the issue of immigration. Participants were asked the following
question: "Have you ever actively participated, by giving your opinion, in conversations or
discussions on the issue of immigration?" (from 1 “never” to 5 “many times”; M= 2.98, DT= 1.26).
Level of contact with immigrants. Participants were asked whether they maintain or had maintained
(1=yes, 0=no) some kind of family, friendship, work, school or neighbourhood relation with
immigrants (Cea d'Ancona, 2004). An index of personal contact with immigrants was created from
the sum of the five dichotomous variables considered (M= 1.85, DT= 1.28).
The variables “emotions felt during the reading of the news story” and “interest aroused by the news
story” were used to compare the effectiveness of the experimental manipulation of the involvement
with the news story. The measurement of the evaluation of the news story was included to verify the
equivalence of the four versions of the news story. The variables “interest in the subject of
immigration”, “participation in discussions about the issue of immigration”, “level of contact with
immigrants”, along with the sex and age of respondents, were considered as control variables and
were included to assess the effectiveness of the randomisation of participants of the experimental
conditions. Finally, the variables “attitude towards immigration”, “beliefs about the consequences of
immigration” and “emotions felt towards immigrants” constituted the dependent variables of the
study.
2.2. Results
First, we carried out a one-way analysis of variance that included the experimental condition [5] as
the independent variable and the nine indicators of the evaluation of the news story as dependent
variables. The results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the four
versions of the experimental news story in any of the evaluation variables of the news story (in all
analyses p> .220). These results indicate that the four experimental news stories, despite containing
two manipulations, did not generate differences in terms of their general assessment and therefore
behaved as homogeneous stimuli. Significant differences were neither observed among the four
experimental groups according to sex, age, political self-positioning interest in the subject of
immigration, participation in conversations about the issue of immigration and the level of contact
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 605
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
with immigrants (in all analyses p> .250). Therefore, it can be concluded that the randomisation of
participants to the conditions was successful and led to the formation of four homogeneous groups in
relevant variables.
In order to compare the efficacy of the manipulation of involvement, we explored the effect of that
variable in the interest aroused by the news story and in the intensity of the experienced emotions.
There were no significant differences in the interest or the intensity of the emotions provoked by the
reading of the news story depending on the different levels of involvement (in all analyses p> .120).
As a result of these findings, it can be concluded that the manipulation of the involvement with the
news story did not produce the expected effect on participants, so that the news stories located in
Valladolid and Barcelona led to the same pattern of emotions and the same degree of interest.
Despite this, we proceeded to test the hypotheses.
Figure 1. Effect of information on the nationality of criminals and the involvement with the
issue of the news story on the attitudes towards immigration
To test hypothesis 1 we carry out a single factor analysis of variance for a 2 x 2 design of
independent measures, being “attitude towards immigration” the dependent variable. We observed a
statistically significant interaction effect between the two independent variables (F(1, 233)=4.36,
p<.038, ηp2=.018), which confirms H1 and shows that among participants with low involvement, the
effect of the mention about the criminals’ nationality (to highlight that they were immigrants) on
attitudes toward immigration was higher than among participants with high involvement (Figure 1).
However, with regards to the negative belief that "immigration contributes to the increase in crime
and public insecurity" there was no a significant interaction effect between the two independent
variables, so hypothesis 2 did not receive empirical support.
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 606
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
Figure 2. Effect of information on the nationality of criminals and the involvement with the
issue of the news story on the negative emotions toward immigrants
In terms of the impact on the emotions towards immigrants, there was a statistically significant
interaction effect between the two independent variables (F(1, 230) = 4.61, p< .033, ηp2 = .020) on
the negative emotions towards immigrants (fear, mistrust, insecurity, discomfort and indifference).
Participants with low involvement reported more negative emotions towards the immigrants when
they read a news story indicating that the criminals were foreign, in comparison to the participants
that read the news story that did not include this information (Figure 2).
To test hypothesis 4 we used the macro PROCESS (model 4, simple mediational model) for SPSS,
which was created by Hayes (2013) to estimate indirect effects on mediational models through the
bootstrapping method (Hayes, 2009). The hypothesised mediational model included the following
variables: presence or absence of information about the nationality of criminals (independent
variable, coded as dummy variable, being 1=the news story mentions that criminals are immigrants,
0=the news story does not mention the criminals’ nationlity); attitude towards immigration
(mediating variable); and degree of agreement with the negative and stereotypical belief
"immigration contributes to the increase in crime and public insecurity" (dependent variable). The
proposed mediational model was computed separately for the participants with high and low
involvement.
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 607
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
Figure 3. Mediational analyses (low involvement, n = 119, study 1): attitude towards
immigration as mediating variable in the relation between the reference to the nationality of
the protagonists of the news story and the negative stereotypical beliefs on immigration
Group cue -> Attitude towards immigration -> Immigration contributes to the increase in crime
B indirect effect = .44, SE = .19, 95% CI [.18, .74]
Note. The previous figure shows the non-standardised regression coefficients, B. The coefficient of
the direct effect is shown in parentheses. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001.
The mediational analysis applied between the low involvement participants revealed that attitudes
towards immigration mediated the relation between the presence of information about the nationality
of the protagonists of the news story and a greater agreement with the negative stereotypical belief
"immigration contributes to the increase in crime and public insecurity", since the indirect effect
(calculated by using 10,000 bootstrap samples) was statistically significant (B indirect effect = .44, SE =
.14, 95% CI [.18, .74]) [6]. Thus, the mentioning that the criminals were immigrants induced a more
negative attitude towards immigration (B = -1.62, p< .001) and this, in turn, was associated with a
greater agreement with the idea that "immigration contributes to the increase in crime and public
insecurity" (B = -.27, p< .001) (see Figure 3). However, the mediational analysis among high
involvement participants revealed that attitudes towards immigration do not mediate the relation
between the presence of information about the nationality of the protagonists of the news story and
greater agreement with the negative stereotypical belief "immigration contributes to the increase in
crime and public insecurity", since the indirect effect was not statistically significant (B indirect effect =
.03), SE = .09, 95% CI [- .15, .22]. Thus, hypothesis 4 did receive empirical support.
2.3. Conclusions
The results of study 1 corroborated three of the four hypotheses. It corroborated that the presence of
information about the nationality of the criminals had a significant effect on the negative attitudes
and emotions towards immigrants specifically when the involvement with the topic of the news story
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 608
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
was low. The results also corroborated that the process or mechanism of influence of the reference to
the nationality of the criminals in the activation of stereotypical beliefs was mediated by attitudes
towards immigration, but only among participants with low involvement. However, this does not
mean that people with high involvement are not susceptible to this type of peripheral information. As
hypothesised, in this case the process of influence is very likely to be related to cognitive mediation,
i.e., due to the activation of trains of thought. This hypothesis was confirmed in the second study.
3. Study 2
Study 1 presented an important limitation: there were no differences in the interest nor in the
emotional impact of the story among people exposed to a news story that alluded to an incident
occurred in his own city (Valladolid, high involvement) in comparison to people who read a news
story that chronicled the same event but located in another far city (Barcelona, low involvement). A
second limitation is that it did not collect information about reactions to the news story (cognitive
responses), since only self-report methods were employed. Therefore, a second experiment was
designed in order to address the aforementioned problems. The main objective of the second study
was to test a mediational model that included the cognitive responses raised by the reading of the
news story as mediating variables.
3.1. Method
Study 2 consisted of an experimental research which involved 276 students from the University of
Salamanca. The average age of participants was 19 years (DT = 2.49; 17-46 years) and 56.2% of
them were women.
As in study 1, this study used a 2 x 2 between-subjects design, based on two experimental
manipulations of a news story (group cue and involvement). We used the same news story used in
study 1 (only 4.7% of the participants stated that they had already read the news story before), with
the necessary modifications. Two conditions were created for the manipulation of involvement with
the subject of the news story: low (the criminal event takes place in Oviedo) or high (the criminal
event takes place in Salamanca, the city of the participants). The dependent variables were evaluated
using a split-ballot questionnaire. The experiments took place in several classrooms of the University
of Salamanca. In each classroom, participants were randomized to the four experimental groups.
After the experimental news story was read, participants had to answer the questionnaire including
the dependent, manipulation-check, and control variables:
Cognitive responses. These were evaluated with the "thought-listing technique" (Igartua and Cheng,
2009; Valkenburg, Semetko and de Vreese, 1999). Participants were asked: "write all thoughts, ideas
or reflexions you had while reading the news story, i.e. those ideas that came to your mind during the
reading of the news story". Four people [7] with training in content analysis conducted the coding
process. The first part of the analysis focused on counting the total number of cognitive response and
the total number of words written by each respondent. Then, the following criteria were evaluated
taking the ideas written down as units of analysis: a) Do they make any reference to the nationality of
the criminals, with expressions such as foreign or immigrant (or similar), or do they make a comment
about immigration and foreigners in general? (1 = yes, 0 = no); b) Do they show empathy, sympathy,
pity, or identification with the victims of the criminal act? (1 = yes, 0 = no); c) Do they manifest a
reaction of indignation, contempt, anger, rage or disgust for the situation reported in the news story,
or towards the criminals? (1 = yes, 0 = no); d) Do they demand punitive measures (such as more
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 609
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
severe prison sentences) or police measures (more surveillance or police effectiveness) to deal with
the type of events narrated in the news story? (1 = yes, 0 = no); e) Do they allude to the lack of
public security, or the feeling of insecurity or fear in society? (1 = yes, 0 = no); f) Do they use insults
or negative expressions such as "inhuman nature", "in col d blood", "brutality", "harshness",
"cowardice", "evil", "cruelty", "shameless", or other terms that allude to the character or personality
of the criminals of the news story? (1 = yes, 0 = no); g) Do they make a direct connection between
immigration and crime or insecurity? For example, when we say that immigrants are criminals or
that with the increase of immigration there are more crimes or insecurity? (1 = yes, 0 = no).
To assess the reliability of the encoding, 46 questionnaires were randomly chosen (16.66% of the
sample, 137 cognitive responses) and independently examined by two analysts based on the previous
criteria. Reliability was calculated with Krippendorff’s coefficient Alpha (using KALPHA macro for
SPSS; Hayes and Krippendorff, 2007). The results of the reliability are: number of written cognitive
responses (αk = .95), number of written words (αk= .99), reference to the nationality of criminals (αk=
1.0), expressions of empathy (αk= .82), expressions of revulsion (αk = .65), demands for punitive or
police measures (αk = .83), alluding to the lack of security (αk= .58), references to the character or
personality of criminals (αk= .54) and allusions to the existence of a relation between immigration
and insecurity (αk= .82). The mean of the written cognitive responses was 3.41 ideas per person
(DT= 1.46) and the mean of written words was 41.64 words per person (DT= 27.30). An aggregated
data file was created with the information from the encoding of cognitive responses (taking as
aggregation variable the number of questionnaire), so that the final database (which also contained
information about the rest of the variables) indicated the number and percentage of cognitive
responses that focused on each of the aspects identified for each participant.
Emotions felt during the reading of the news story. Participants had to indicate the extent to what
(from 1 "nothing" to 5 "a lot") reading of the news story had made them feel the ten different
emotions (see study 1).
Evaluation of the news story. We used a semantic differential comprised of 9 bipolar 7-point scales
with antonyms in their extremes: "clear-confuse", "easy to reading-difficult to read", etc. (see study
1).
Interest aroused by the news story. Participants were asked to "assesses the degree of interest
aroused by the news story" (from 0 "no interest" to 10 "great interest").
Beliefs about the consequences of immigration. Participants were asked to indicate their degree of
agreement or disagreement towards 8 claims about the consequences of immigration in Spain (see
items in study 1). Principal components factor analysis (varimax rotation) extracted two factors
(61.81% of the variance). The first factor referred to the belief that "immigration is a necessary
contribution to the country" (α =.73); while the second factor referred to the belief that "immigration
contributes to the increase in crime and public insecurity" (α =.86).
Political self-positioning. Participants were asked to answer to the following question: "in political
issues the expressions left and right are normally used. What number of the following scale would
represent best your political position? (from 1 left to 10 right)"; M= 5.23, DT= 2.38).
Media consumption. Participants were asked to answer to the following four questions: How many
hours do you watch TV in a normal weekday? Do you listen to the radio? Do you read the general
information press? Do you surf the Internet? A "general media consumption" indicator was created
from the simple sum of the four considered variables (M=396.96 minutes a day, DT=280.01).
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 610
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
News consumption. Participants were asked to answer to the following four question: "to what extent
(from 1 "nothing" to 5 "a lot") do you usually follow the news through the following media?" (Radio,
television, print media and Internet). An indicator of "news media consumption" was created from
the simple sum of the four considered variables (M=12.44, DT=2.40).
Interest in the subject of immigration. Participants were asked to answer to the following question:
To what extent are you interested in the subject of immigration? (from 1 "nothing" to 5 "a lot"; M=
3.60, DT= 0.75).
Participation in discussions on the subject of immigration. Participants were asked to answer to the
following four question: Have you ever actively participated, by giving your opinion, in
conversations or discussions on the subject of immigration? (from 1 'never' to 5 "many times";
M=2.94, DT=1.14).
Level of contact with immigrants. Participants were asked whether they have or had had maintained
(1=yes, 0=no) some kind of family, friendship, work, school or neighbourhood relation with
immigrants. An index of personal contact with immigrants was created from the simple sum of the
five dichotomous variables (M=2.32, DT= 1.25).
Experience with crime. Participants were asked to answer to the following questions: "Have you
ever, in the course of your life, been the victim of a robbery in which there was no physical assault?"
(1=yes, 0=no; 36.2% were affirmative answers) and "Have you ever been the victim of a robbery
involving physical violence?" (1=yes, 0=no; 4.0% were affirmative answers). An index of personal
experience with crime was created from the sum of the values of these variables (M=0.39, DT=0.52).
3.2. Results
First, we carried out a one-way factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) that included the experimental
condition (made up of four groups) as the independent variable and the nine indicators of the
evaluation of the news story as the dependent variables. The results showed that there were no
statistically significant differences between the four versions of the experimental news story in any
of the evaluation variables of the news story (in all analyses p> .296). These results indicate that the
four experimental versions of the news story, despite containing two types of manipulation, did not
generate differences in terms of their general assessment and therefore behaved as homogeneous
stimuli. No significant differences were neither observed between the four experimental groups
according to sex, age, interest in the subject of immigration, participation in conversations about the
issue of immigration, level of contact with immigrants, experience with crime, media consumption
and news consumption (in all analyses p> .330). Therefore, it can be concluded that the procedure of
randomisation of participants to the conditions was successful and led to the formation of four
homogeneous groups in relevant variables.
In the indicator of interest aroused by the news story, there were no statistically significant
differences between the participants who read the news story located in Salamanca (M=6.73,
DT=1.85) and those who read the news story located in Oviedo (M=6.55, DT=1.90) (t(274) =-0.81,
p=.419). With regards to the emotional impact of the news story, there was only one statistically
significant difference with respect to the emotion of surprise (t(270)=-2.66, p<.008). Participants
who read the news story located in Salamanca (M=2.66, DT=1.05) showed greater surprise than
participants who read the same news but located in Oviedo (M=2.33, DT=0.98). Based on these
findings, it can be concluded that the manipulation of involvement with the news story did not
produce the expected effect in terms of interest and emotions, which suggests that the procedure used
to manipulate the involvement with the news story is not entirely appropriate.
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 611
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
Figure 4. Effect of the reference to the nationality of criminals and effect of the involvement
with the subject of the news story on the total number of written CR
In order to test hypothesis 5 we carried out nine analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) for a 2 x 2
between-subjects factor design, including as covariates such variables as sex, age, political selfpositioning, interest in the subject of immigration, in conversations about the issue of immigration,
level of contact with immigrants, experience with crime, media consumption and news consumption.
With the inclusion of covariates we obtained information about the impact of the independent
variables, controlling for the influence of other relevant variables, which increases the statistical
power of the analysis (Hayes, 2005). The dependent variables considered were the different
indicators created from the cognitive responses (CR; see methods).
We obtained a marginally significant interaction effect in the "total number of CR" (F(1, 189) =
2.94, p<.088, ηp2=.015). There were no differences between participants with high and low
involvement when the nationality of the criminals was not mentioned. On the other hand, among the
students who read the news story mentioning that criminals were immigrants there were clear
differences depending on their involvement: participants with high involvement wrote more
cognitive responses (see Figure 4). A similar result was obtained with respect to the "total number of
written words" by participants (Figure 5). In this case, the marginally significant interaction effect
(F(1, 189)=3.40, p<.067, ηp2=.018) showed that participants with high and low involvement reacted
very differently depending on whether the nationality of the criminals was included or not in the
news story.
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 612
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
Figure 5. Effect of the reference to the nationality of criminals and effect of the involvement
with the subject of the news story on the total number of written words
In the variable "percentage of CR which allude to the nationality of the criminals", there was a
significant interaction effect between the two independent variables (F(1, 160)=4.02, p<.042,
ηp2=.026), being people with high involvement, in comparison to the people with low involvement,
the most affected by the news story that mentioned the nationality of the criminals (Figure 6).
Similarly, there was a statistically significant interaction effect in the comments written by
participants that linked immigration with the increase in insecurity (F(1, 160)=7.07, p<.009,
ηp2=.042): face with a news story mentioning the nationality of the criminals, it was people with high
involvement who wrote more cognitive responses that associated immigration with public insecurity
(Figure 7).
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 613
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
Figure 6. Effect of the reference to the nationality of criminals and effect of the involvement with the
subject of the news story on the percentage of CR alluding to the nationality of criminals
Figure 7. Effect of the reference to the nationality of criminals and effect of the involvement
with the subject of the news story on the percentage of CR with allusions to the existence of a
relationship between immigration and insecurity
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 614
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
To test hypothesis 6 we used the macro PROCESS for SPSS (model 4) created by Hayes (2013),
which tested a mediational model with multiple mediating variables (Preacher and Hayes, 2008),
since the seven indicators of cognitive responses obtained from the thought-listing techique (all
except the number of CR and the number of written words) were introduced as such variables, being
the independent variable the inclusion or not of the reference to the criminals’ nationality
(independent variable, encoded as dummy variable, being 1=the news story mentions the criminals
are immigrants, 0=the news story does not mention the criminals’ nationality), and the dependent
variable the degree of agreement with the negative and stereotypical belief that "immigration
contributes to the increase in crime and public insecurity". The mediational model was computed
separately for the participants with high and low involvement (calculated with 10,000 bootstrap
samples), and expected cognitive variables to only have a significant mediating effect on participants
with high involvement.
Figure 8. Mediational analysis (high involvement, n = 116, study 2): cognitive responses raised by
the reading of the news story as mediating variables in the relation between the reference to the
nationality of the criminals of the news story and the negative stereotypical beliefs about
immigration
Group cue -> CR about immigration = crime -> Immigration contributes to the increase in crime
B indirect effect = .21, SE = .11, 95% CI [.02, 47]
Note. The previous figure shows the non-standardised regression coefficients, B. The coefficient of
the direct effect is shown in parentheses. + p < .10, * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001
The mediational analysis applied to the low involvement participants revealed that none of the seven
variables related to the cognitive impact of the news story acted as a mediating variable and,
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 615
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
therefore, that there were no statistically significant indirect effects. On the other hand, the
mediational analysis applied to participants with high involvement revealed a statistically significant
indirect effect through the mediating variable "CR on the existence of a relationship between
immigration and the increase in public insecurity" (B indirect effect = .21, SE = .11, 95% CI [.02. 47];
Figure 8). Thus, the inclusion of the nationality of criminals in the news story induced a large
number of cognitive answers alluding to the relationship between immigration and insecurity (B =
.31, p< .001), which was associated in turn with a greater agreement with the stereotypical belief that
"immigration contributes to the increase in crime and public insecurity" (B = .69, p< .042).
3.3. Conclusions
The results obtained in the second study constitute a substantial support to the hypotheses
formulated. Consistent with hypothesis 5, involvement with the news story increased participants’
cognitive production (the degree of reflection and the number of written words) especially when it
mentioned that the criminals were immigrants. In addition, in the case of the news story mentioning
the nationality of the criminals, it was people with high involvement who largely wrote cognitive
responses that linked immigration and insecurity. The results of the mediational model are also
consistent with hypothesis 6. They confirmed that the cognitive responses (in particular, the
cognitive responses alluding to a relationship between immigration and public insecurity) explained
the effect of the reference to the nationality of the criminals in the activation of the stereotypes about
immigrants, but only when the involvement with the topic of the news story was high.
4. Conclusions and general discussion
The main objective of the two experimental studies was to identify the mechanisms or processes that
explain the socio-cognitive impact caused by the news story’s dominant framing of immigration
(which links immigration with crime and the increase in insecurity). Both studies were designed
based on the findings of framing effects research, the cognitive processing of persuasive
communications and the role of the (textual or visual) cues on the race or nationality of the
protagonists of the news story in the activation of stereotypes (e.g., Brader et al., 2008; Igartua and
Cheng, 2009; Igartua, Moral and Fernández, 2011; Peffley, Shields and Williams, 2001).
Using a news story about a criminal and very violent act, in which the information on the nationality
of the criminals (group cue) and the place where the event took place (involvement) were
manipulated, we confirmed that participants showed a more negative attitude towards immigration
and experienced more negative emotions towards immigrants when they read the news story that
labelled criminals as immigrants and had a low involvement, which confirmed hypotheses 1 and 3.
However, this same effect of interaction did not take place in relation to the impact on the negative
stereotypical beliefs ("immigration contributes to the increase in crime and public insecurity"), so
hypothesis 2 did not receive empirical support. However, there was an indirect effect in these beliefs,
since participants with low involvement showed a greater degree of agreement with the stereotypical
beliefs when the news story mentioned the immigrant status of the criminals and this effect was
mediated by attitudes towards immigration. Therefore, mentioning the nationality of the criminals
had an indirect effect on the activation of the stereotypes but only when the news story had aroused
little interest (low involvement) among participants, which corroborated hypothesis 4.
In study 2 we collected and analysed the cognitive responses produced by the reading of the news
story through the “thought-listing technique”. The results indicate that participants with high and low
involvement reacted very differently depending on whether the nationality of the criminals was
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 616
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
mentioned or not. Thus, involvement with the subject of the news story increased the cognitive
production of participants but only when the news story mentioned that the criminals were
immigrants. In addition, there was cognitive channelling and more critical cognitive responses
towards immigration among the participants with high involvement with the news story that defined
the criminals as immigrants or foreigners, which confirmed hypothesis 5. Hypothesis 6 was also
corroborated since the critical or negative cognitive responses that alluded to the existence of a
relationship between immigration and public insecurity explained the effect of the reference to the
nationality of the criminals on the activation of stereotypes about immigrants, but only when the
involvement with the subject of the news story was high.
The results are convergent with the theoretical proposal and with a dual model for news framing
effects. It was confirmed that the peripheral cues included in a news story (e.g. a news story about a
criminal act mentioning that the criminals are immigrants or foreigners, group cue) had significant
socio-cognitive effects on the cognitive responses, attitudes and beliefs and emotions experienced by
the reader. However, the mechanism that explains these effects is different depending on the level of
readers’ involvement with the narrated event. When the event occurs outside the context of the
reader (low involvement) the influence of the peripheral cues occurs because the group cue included
in the news story activates a kind of mental shortcut, an quick judgement of the object that has been
highlighted in the news story (in this case, the fact that the criminals of the story are immigrants or
foreigners), which produces a process of attitudinal modelling. In other words, the peripheral cue
activates a certain attitude and this in turn influences the activation, formation or reinforcement of a
certain belief or opinion. This mechanism is not triggered among people with high involvement with
the subject of the news story, which does not mean that they are not affected by the peripheral cues.
Thus, when people read a news story about an event that has taken place in their own local context
(high involvement), the peripheral cues influence the processes of reflection and activate a type of
biased cognitive processing, which leads to a process of cognitive channelling: the cognitive answers
written by readers have the same tone of the information that appears in the news story, which will in
turn determine its impact on opinions or beliefs.
This theoretical proposal on the news framing effects mechanisms has been tested in a specific
context: the treatment of immigration in the media. In order to verify its validity in a more general
context, future research should focus on other issues. In addition, future research should take into
consideration the effect of other peripheral cues in the construction of the news framing, beyond the
reference to the nationality of the protagonists of the story. On the other hand, new research studies
should be carried out to examine the long-term effects in conditions of high and low involvement
since, according to the Elaboration Likelihood Model, the attitudes formed or changed through the
central route show greater temporal persistence, greater behaviour prediction power and greater
resistance to counterarguments than the attitudes formed or changed through the peripheral route (Petty
and Cacioppo, 1986). Although these predictions have been proven in the field of persuasion there is no
empirical evidence to date about whether these processes also operate in relation to news framing
effects.
The two experimental studies had satisfactory levels of quality (randomisation of participants to the
treatments, homogeneous stimuli, adequate internal consistency of the scales), but they also had a
series of limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the procedure to manipulate the involvement
did not work properly. Anyways, the peripheral group cue did exercise a significant indirect effect in
the activation of the stereotypical and negative beliefs about immigration through the mediation of
attitudes (low involvement) and cognitive responses (high involvement). A second limitation is that
both studies involved college students, i.e. a very homogeneous group in terms of their attitudes
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 617
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
towards immigrants. It would be advisable to replicate this type of research with the general
population. Thirdly, another possible limitation refers to the type of dependent variables used (the
self-administered scales and the “thought-listing technique” task). Relevant effects could have been
more easily found through the use of implicit measures of attitudes (Briñol, Petty and McCaslin,
2009; Dovidio, Kawakami, Smoak and Gaertner, 2009).
This article is part of the research project funded by the Research Projects Support
Programme of the Education Council of the Government of Castile and León: Análisis y
efectos socio-cognitivos de los encuadres noticiosos de la inmigración en la prensa
regional de Castilla y León ("Analysis and socio-cognitive effects of the news framing of
immigration in the regional press in Castile and León"), reference nº SA040A06.
5. List of references
Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986): The moderator--mediator variable distinction in social
psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Brader, T., Valentino, N. A. and Suhay, E. (2008): What triggers public opposition to immigration?
Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 959-978.
Briñol, P., Petty, R. E. and McCaslin, M. J. (2009): Changing attitudes on implicit versus explicit
measures: what is the difference? In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, and P. Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights
from the new implicit measures (pp. 429–458). Nueva York, NY: Psychology Press.
Cea D’Ancona, M. A. (2004): La activación de la xenofobia en España. Madrid: CIS-Siglo XXI.
De Vreese, C. H. (2003): Framing Europe. Television news and European integration. Amsterdam:
Aksant.
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Smoak, N. and Gaertner, S. L. (2009): The nature of contemporary
racial prejudice: insights from implicit and explicit measures of attitudes. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio,
and P. Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 429–458). Nueva York,
NY: Psychology Press.
Entman, R. (1993): Framing: toward a clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of
Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
Gilliam, F. D., Iyengar, S., Simon, A. and Wright, O. (1996): Crime in black and white. The violent,
scary world of local news. Press/Politics, 1(3), 6–23.
Gross, K. and Brewer, P. R. (2007): Sore losers: news frames, policy debates, and emotions.
Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(1), 122-133.
Gross, K. and D’Ambrosio, L. (2004): Framing emotional response. Political Psychology, 25 (1), 129.
Hayes, A. F. (2005): Statistical methods for communication science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Hayes, A. F. (2009): Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium.
Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420.
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 618
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
Hayes, A. F. (2013): Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis. A
regression-based approach. Nueva York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Hayes, A. F. and Krippendorff, K. (2007): Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for
coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77-89.
Igartua, J. J. and Cheng, L. (2009): Moderating effect of group cue while processing news on
immigration. Is framing effect a heuristic process? Journal of Communication, 59(4), 726-749.
Igartua, J. J., Cheng, L. and Lopes, O. (2003): To think or not to think: two pathways towards
persuasion by short films on Aids prevention. Journal of Health Communication, 8(6), 513-528.
Igartua, J. J., Moral, F. and Fernández, I. (2011): Cognitive, attitudinal and emotional effects of the
news frame and group cues on processing news about immigration. Journal of Media Psychology,
23(4), 174-185.
Iyengar, S. (1991): Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: The
University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, B. T. and Eagly, A. H. (1990): Involvement and persuasion: types, traditions and the evidence.
Psychological Bulletin, 107(3), 375-384.
Machill, M., Köhler, S. and Waldhauser, M. (2007): The use of narrative structures in television
news. An experiment in innovative forms of journalistic presentation. European Journal of
Communication, 22(2), 185–205.
Matthes, J. (2007): Beyond accessibility? Toward an on-line and memory-based model of framing
effects. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research,32 (1), 51-78.
McCombs, M. E., Lopez-Escobar, E. and Llamas, J. P. (2000): Setting the agenda of attributes in the
1996 Spanish general election. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 77-92.
McCombs, M. E. and Reynolds, A. (2002): News influence on our pictures of the world. In J. Bryant
and D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects. Advances in theory and research (pp. 1-18). Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Navas, M., García, M. C., Rojas, A. J., Pumares, P. and Cuadrado, I. (2006): Actitudes de
aculturación y prejuicio: la perspectiva de autóctonos e inmigrantes. Psicothema, 18 (2), 187-193.
Peffley, M., Shields, T. and Williams, B. (2001): The intersection of race and crime in television
news stories: an experimental study. Political Communication, 13(3), 309-327.
Perse, E. M. (2001): Media effects and society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. (1986): Communication and persuasion. Central and peripheral routes
to attitude change. Nueva York: Springer-Verlag.
Petty, R. E., Priester, J. R. and Wegener, D. T. (1994): Cognitive processes in attitude change. In R. S.
Wyer and T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition. Volume 2: applications (pp. 69-141).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Preacher, K. J. and Hayes, A. F. (2008): Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and
comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879891.
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 619
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
Price, V. and Tewksbury, D. (1997): News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media
priming and framing. In G. Barnett and F. J. Foster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp.
173-212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
Price, V., Tewksbury, D. and Powers, E. (1997): Switching trains of thought. The impact of news
frames on reader’s cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24(5), 481-506.
Scheufele, D. (1999): Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103122.
Scheufele, D. (2000): Agenda-setting, priming and framing revisited: another look at cognitive
effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3(2-3), 297-316.
Sendín, J. C. and Izquierdo, P. (2008):Guía práctica para los profesionales de los medios de
comunicación: tratamiento mediático de la inmigración. Madrid: OBERAXE, Ministerio de Trabajo
y Asuntos Sociales.
Tankard, J. W. (2001): The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H.
Gandy and A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 95-106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Valkenburg, P. M., Semetko, H. A. and de Vreese, C. H. (1999): The effects of news frames on readers’
thoughts and recall. Communication Research, 26(5), 550-569.
Von Sikorski, C. and Schierl, T. (2012): Effects of news frames on recipients’ information
processing in disability sports communications. Journal of Media Psychology, 24(3), 113-123.
6. Notes
[1] See “Recomendaciones del CAC sobre el tratamiento informativo de la inmigración”
("Recommendations of the Audiovisual Council of Catalonia on the news treatment of immigration")
http://www.cac.cat/pfw_files/cma/recerca/quaderns_cac/Q12recomanacions_ES.pdf
[2] Media effects research is increasingly more focused on the analysis of the mediating processes
and mechanisms. The works of Baron and Kenny (1986) and, most recently, Hayes (2009) have
given researchers methodological tools to contrast the mediational processes and to gain deeper and
more advanced insights into the causal evidence of the media effects (Hayes, 2013). Research on
framing effects has been influenced by this strand of mediational analyses. In this context, the
objective is not only to determine whether a particular news approach or frame influences the
cognitive, attitudinal and emotional processes, but also to explain the responsible mechanism, i.e. to
determine why a certain influence occurs depending on how a news story is built.
[3] The field work was carried out with the collaboration of José Antonio Otero, Professor of the
University of Salamanca and member of its Observatory of Audiovisual Content.
[4] The online version of the news story is available at:
http://elpais.com/diario/2006/06/18/espana/1150581613_850215.html.
[5] The new “condition” variable (made up of four groups) was created from the combination of the
levels of the two independent variables.
[6] According to the bootstrapping method, an indirect effect is statistically significant if the
established confidence interval (CI at 95%) does not include the zero value. If the zero value is
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 620
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social # 068 – Pages 599 to 621
Research funded | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en | ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2013
included in said confidence interval, the null hypothesis that proposes that the indirect effect equals
0, i.e. that there is no association between the involved variables, cannot be rejected (Hayes, 2013).
[7] The coders were: Elena Palacios, Salvador Alvidrez, Socorro Palitó and Tania Acosta.
_____________________________________________
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE IN BIBLIOGRAHIES / REFERENCES:
JJ Igartua (2013): “Attitudinal impact and cognitive channeling of immigration stereotypes through
the news”, at Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 68, pages 599 to 621.
Article received on 22 July 2013. Submitted to pre-review on 24 July. Sent to reviewers on 26 July.
Accepted on 19 September 2013. Galley proofs made available to the author on 1 October 2013.
Approved by author on: 3 October 2013. Published on 4 October 2013.
_____________________________________________
http://www.revistalatinacs.org/068/paper/992_Salamanca/26_Igartuaen.html
Página 621