Article
The Possibilities of Preservation, Regeneration and
Presentation of Industrial Heritage:
The Case of Old Mint “A.D.” on Belgrade Riverfront
Marko Nikolić, Boško Drobnjak and Irena Kuletin Ćulafić *
University of Belgrade‐Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73/II,
11000 Belgrade, Serbia; marko@arh.bg.ac.rs (M.N.); drobnjak.b@arh.bg.ac.rs (B.D.)
* Correspondence: kuletin@arh.bg.ac.rs
Received: 28 May 2020; Accepted: 25 June 2020; Published: 29 June 2020
Abstract: This paper aims to explore industrial heritage of Belgrade that is located in the city center
and therefore, has considerable potential for future architectural and urban development of the
Serbian capital. The whole Belgrade riverfront area along the Sava and the Danube Rivers has a
large number of abandoned industrial buildings that have significant value and need to be
preserved and revitalized. This paper represents a research project conducted by lecturers at the
Faculty of Architecture in Belgrade in the course History and Theory 1—Visual Culture in
Architectural Theory and Practice. In order to provide productive research, we have employed the
case study method based on the old Mint “A.D.”, which we have chosen as a characteristic example
of Belgrade’s industrial heritage architecture. An important goal of this research is to provide
professional information and raise public awareness about the importance and potential of
industrial heritage for the future economic, cultural, social and tourist development of the city. This
paper analyzes possibilities to comprehend the problems of the city’s industrial heritage protection
regarding its historical and urban context, its genesis, authenticity, identity, cultural, architectural,
economic, social, productive, creative and environmental values. According to that, the main goal
of this research is concentrated on the sustainable preservation of specific cultural tangible and
intangible values, spirit of the place, city identity and historic cityscape values that characterize
industrial heritage in the social, cultural, natural and built environmental systems.
Keywords: industrial heritage; Belgrade riverfront; protection; regeneration; sustainability;
educational projects; environmental approach to architecture and urban design
1. Introduction
Belgrade is one of the oldest cities in Europe, built on the confluence of the Sava and Danube
Rivers. It is the intersection of Western and Eastern Europe. Belgrade integrates layers of rich
historical and multicultural values, from prehistoric and ancient Roman times, through the Middle
Ages, Ottoman and Austro‐Hungarian influences to socialist and post‐socialist cultural heritage. In
this rich cultural setting, architecture and city planning were always carriers of significant cultural,
social and ideological values [1]. The area of Belgrade along the banks of the Sava and Danube
Rivers has a large number of abandoned industrial facilities that have significant monumental value,
which should be preserved and revitalized. Some steps in that direction have already been taken,
and some industrial buildings and plants represent significant sights in the tourist offer of the city. In
the last decade, the construction of new architectural and urban projects on the Belgrade riverfront
has resulted in negative impacts on the cultural heritage of Belgrade and the historic cityscape,
which contains a characteristic urban morphology and typology that is gradually declining. In order
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264; doi:10.3390/su12135264
www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
2 of 36
to stop this tendency and modify it in accordance with the principles of sustainable development, it
is necessary to redefine the approach to protection and revitalization of industrial zones by creating
a new approach to protection, conservation and construction in former industrial zones. This should
be done while taking into account various value parameters, yet with respect for the tradition,
authenticity and identity of these specific cultural spaces.
In that sense, in the master academic study programs in architecture and integrated academic
studies of architecture, in the course History and Theory 1—Visual Culture in Architectural Theory
and Practice, we started a research project exhibiting the discovery of adequate opportunities for
protection, revitalization and presentation of the Mint “A.D.” in Belgrade. Through various
conceptual solutions, the students emphasized the importance of the cultural‐historical, urban and
architectural values of the building and its ambience. The goal was to define sustainable solutions
that would protect all phases of development of the complex, while respecting the basic principle of
protection and revitalization, which is based on preserving the authenticity and monumental values
of each historic building. On the other hand, the proposals were aimed at a common goal—to
reactivate the complex and make it useful—as well as to integrate it into its immediate environment.
The students proposed a range of modern cultural, educational and artistic ways to use the complex,
which would be in line with its character and significance, as one of the successful ways to realize its
active future and inclusion in modern life.
Unlike the total architectural heritage, which spans to hundreds or even thousands of years, the
horizon of observing industrial heritage is narrowed to several centuries, even dozens of years. This
is influenced by the following two facts: (1) Industry began to develop only a few hundred years
ago, with an intensive rise in the second half of the 18th century, after the so called “industrial
revolution” in England, and especially in the last few decades, following the progressive and
accelerating development of new technologies in almost all areas of human activity; and (2) Industry
itself, due to its properties, is “self‐destructive”, i.e., in accordance with new technologies and new
methods of work, it constantly innovates processes and removes, changes, and even destroys
existing means of production and infrastructure, including buildings and the immediate
environment. However, in addition to that, it is clear that there is a general social interest in
preserving this time‐limited and specific form of heritage, as a witness to the development of
technologies and technical culture, for future generations. This interest is acknowledged all over the
world, and serious measures have been taken in recent years [2].
The Industrial Revolution is considered one of the most significant events in human history that
has strongly influenced human society. Therefore, all the material and intangible heritage related to
industrialization represent extremely significant historical evidence of the development of
technology and human society, which are part of the collective cultural history of mankind. In the
1950s, industrial archeology was formed as a systematic study of structures and artifacts as a means
of increasing human understanding of the industrial past [3].
In accordance with legal acts and protocols for the safeguarding of world cultural heritage, the
concept of industrial heritage is defined [2,4–8]. Industrial heritage consists of the remains of
industrial culture which are of historical, technological, social, architectural or scientific value. These
remains consist of buildings and machinery, workshops, mills and factories, mines and sites for
processing and refining, warehouses and stores, places where energy is generated, transmitted and
used, transport and all its infrastructure, as well as places used for social activities related to
industry such as housing, religious worship or education [2].
Serbia is one of the late industrialized countries that was affected by the process of
industrialization only in the mid‐19th century. In Serbia, industrialization was associated with the
process of creating an independent country liberated from centuries of Ottoman rule, which entered
the united state of the Yugoslav peoples at the beginning of the 20th century. The industrialization of
the country was one of the key pillars of economic progress of the young Yugoslav state between the
two world wars, and especially after the Second World War, when numerous and diverse industrial
productions were launched throughout the SFRY according to socialist principles of
self‐government [9,10].
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
3 of 36
At the beginning of the development of industrialization, industries were located on the very
outskirts of city centers. The wider area of the case study—Mint “A.D.” (Figure 1) —confirms this,
where numerous industries were located in the area stretching from Belgrade Fortress (the old
fortified city) to Ada Ciganlija (the Belgrade Lake).
Figure 1. Map of the Belgrade and the position of the Mint “A.D.” Source: Scribble Maps (redrawn by
authors).
By overcoming technologies, organization and work processes, these industries were left with
unresolved issues of ownership—abandoned, dilapidated and devastated. Until ten years ago,
industrial heritage was not recognized at all as a type of cultural heritage that constitutes an
important element of the identity and history of Belgrade. Industrial buildings were considered a
mockery, a disgrace, a meeting place of the aesthetics of the ugly in architecture. The public and city
authorities were not aware of the great potential of this specific type of heritage, which, with
adequate protection and renovation, could become a successful driver of economic, social, tourist
and cultural development. Through the engagement of non‐governmental organizations and private
initiatives in recent years, industrial spaces on the Sava and Danube riverbanks are being revitalized
and reused, filled with various creative purposes, which are becoming recognizable for tourists
outside the borders of Serbia. The area in the immediate vicinity of the Mint “A.D.” became one of
the most attractive parts of the city, due to the construction of the megalomaniac project “Belgrade
Waterfront”, which completely restructured and changed the centuries‐old appearance of the
Belgrade riverfront [11].
This is a privately funded project supported by the Government of the Republic of Serbia. The
project “Belgrade Waterfront” is a typical example of the so called globalist “Dubai style
architecture” with skyscrapers, towers and lamellas of residential, business, commercial content, as
well as mixed‐use spaces. The entire project, from the beginning of development of the first plans to
the final works, many of which are still ongoing, is experiencing great public criticism in the local
media and in public forums [12]. The main issue of the controversy over the “Belgrade Waterfront”
project is focused on the environmental and urban inadequacy of this project, which has
significantly endangered existing natural and historic structures, neglecting the potential for
protection of industrial heritage in this area. On the other hand, the project “Belgrade Waterfront” is
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
4 of 36
the largest architectural and urban endeavor with the aim of building a new modern center of
Belgrade.
Although the embodiment of globalist goals of the economy of liberal capitalism, this project
has the opportunity to revitalize this area with appropriate integration of existing industrial
structures and other cultural heritage, while at the same time, respecting the principles of
sustainability, environmental compatibility and protection of cultural heritage. Since the area of the
Belgrade riverfront in the central zone of the city will be built over a decades‐long period, all plans
for future construction should comply with item 4.9. of the Resolution 1924 for Industrial Heritage in
Europe (2013) and introduce measures to safeguard relevant disused industrial heritage sites from
destruction, particularly in urban areas where land values are high [4].
The main results of this research project consist of provided documentation and archives about
industrial heritage in Belgrade. Furthermore, through educational student projects, we elaborate on
different approaches in presentation and contemporary regeneration of old Mint “A.D.”, taking into
account the progressive touristic development of Belgrade, as the place famous for amazing
entertainment, gastronomy, hotel and restaurant services, and opulent social life. In this regard,
regenerative research projects of the Mint follow sustainable solutions, making this remarkable
industrial heritage active, useful once again, and reintegrated in a prosperous and inclusive
environment.
Since we are teaching at the University of Belgrade—Faculty of Architecture, we consider the
topic of preservation, regeneration and presentation of industrial heritage a very current and useful
research issue for our students’ education. To this end, our research also includes their educational
projects. We based our educational work on the crucial importance of environmental and
sustainability knowledge regarding architecture, urban development and heritage protection and
revitalization. Taking into account Serbia’s low level of involvement in sustainable and
environmental practices (Serbia is classified as a developing country regarding the implementation
processes of sustainable development), this research could be useful for Serbian governmental
institutions which are dealing with legal procedures and regulations in the domain of sustainable
development and global environmental goals [13].
Our paper aims to raise awareness among city authorities, cultural and touristic institutions,
investors, architects, city planners, local community inhabitants, creative stakeholders and
architecture students about the importance of industrial heritage and its preservation for integration
into the urban fabric and raising the level of environmental awareness and sustainable design in
architecture and urban planning. The paper is intended for these target groups as we believe that
this type of project research would contribute to expanding knowledge in terms of theoretical and
practical activities in modern Belgrade, with the main goal of sustainable architecture and respect for
principles and recommendations of international charters and efforts of institutions responsible for
cultural heritage. The research projects of the Mint “A.D.” presented in this paper try to highlight the
appropriate and adaptive reuse of industrial heritage as the first and very important step towards
sustainable architectural building and maintenance of the existing historical cultural heritage.
In today’s practice, the leading cultural institutions dealing with the protection of cultural
heritage give priority to other forms of cultural heritage, while the importance of industrial heritage
is marginalized. A major shortcoming is the lack of laws and legal procedures concerning industrial
heritage protection and revitalization. It is important to emphasize that this research project of the
industrial heritage of Belgrade emphasizes the fact that the industrial heritage of Serbia is part of
European scientific and cultural heritage. In this regard, without the connection and cooperation of
Serbian institutions with world institutions, it is not possible to achieve planned goals in the
conservation and preservation of Serbian industrial heritage. With this in mind, this paper examines
in detail the legal bases concerning various conventions, recommendations, acts, agreements, etc., on
the basis of which European and countries worldwide work in relation to industrial cultural
heritage.
In Serbia, the head of the Council for the Protection of Industrial Heritage and the main bearer
of the initiative for protection and preservation of industrial heritage is the Museum of Science and
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
5 of 36
Technology. In addition to numerous museum departments that have very important
documentation and material goods related to Serbian scientific and technological history, this
museum has a special department dedicated to industrial heritage. The Museum of Science and
Technology in Belgrade in cooperation with Republic Institute for the Protection of Cultural
Monuments of Serbia, Belgrade City Institute for the Protection of Cultural Monuments, academic
staff and experts, advocate for the adoption of a single legal act that would enable tangible and
intangible cultural property to be placed under integral protection in accordance with the existing
laws of the Republic of Serbia [14].
In order to promote the integral protection of industrial heritage on the territory of the Republic
of Serbia, many professional institutions, including the University of Belgrade—Faculty of
Architecture, prepare projects, studies and exhibitions aimed at researching, promoting and
popularizing Belgrade’s industrial heritage. These actions result in the further goal of recognizing
the industrial heritage of Serbia by global and European organizations dealing with the protection of
industrial cultural heritage, such as United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization (UNESCO), International Council of Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), International
Committee for the Conservation of the Industrial Heritage (TICCIH), Association for Industrial
Archaeology (AIA), Society for Industrial Archeology (SIA), European Route of Industrial Heritage
(ERIH), European Federation of Associations of Industrial and Technical Heritage (E‐FAITH),
International Committee for the History of Technology (ICOHTEC), United Nations World Tourism
Organization (UNWTO), Europa Nostra, and other organizations.
The focus of this paper is based on research into the importance of Belgrade’s industrial
heritage, its preservation, revitalization and presentation in accordance with the goals of
sustainability and environmental protection. In other words, the focus is on local sustainable
architecture which aims to create new social practices and new social relations [15], referring to the
fact that sustainable architecture absorbs a rather complex integration polygon of cultural, ecological
and natural factors in the material practice of shaping social reality [16]. Through the analysis of
student proposals for reactivation of the Sava riverfront with special emphasis on the industrial
complex of the Mint “A.D.”, a significant contribution was made to a critical review of current
approaches to protection, revitalization and presentation of Belgrade’s industrial zones, all in order
to find recommendations and guidelines for further urban development and preservation of
authenticity and identity of industrial heritage. The relation of the application of spontaneous or
imposed contents in the processes of reuse of industrial heritage is especially considered [17].
2. Materials and Methods
The case study method was chosen in order to best explain and show the causal connections in
practice on a concrete example of an empirical architectural study of the reconstruction and
protection of the Mint “A.D.”. The paper adopts the main methodological principle that theory
should produce a platform for practice, on the basis of which detailed analyses of the selected case
study have emerged. It is a reversible process in which theory informs practice, and practice informs
theory. Having in mind the extensive research conducted by professors from the University of
Belgrade—Faculty of Architecture and long‐term educational practice, it is important to emphasize
that, in research work on the subject, students are not only passive listeners, but are required to
participate in an inclusive and multidisciplinary way. They are encouraged to express their
theoretical knowledge acquired in the lectures in design practice through their projects of
presentation of reconstruction and protection of industrial architecture.
The method of content analysis was used in the initial stages of work in documentation
research, international legal policies, acts and conventions, foreign examples of successfully
performed adaptive reuse, analysis of plans, projects and industrial buildings on the researched area
of Belgrade riverfront stretching from Belgrade Fortress to Ada Ciganlija. Methods of classification,
comparative analysis, methods of abstraction, specification, concretization and generalization were
further used. Based on the analyzed data, mapping, identification and recording of current status,
formation of archives, photo documentation and databases were performed. In the final phase of the
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
6 of 36
work, synthesis, systematization and valorization were carried out, followed by proposals for
presentation solutions for conservation, renovation and reuse of the industrial zone included in the
Mint “A.D.”. As a final part of the paper, a table of valorization of the success of conservation
solutions was formed, where different evaluation criteria were determined in detail.
2.1. Industrial Heritage and Relevant Charters
In the research methodology through the selected case study, we were guided by the criteria of
systematicity and critical analysis. The entire research work is based on a detailed research of the
theoretical foundations on which the legal basis of protection, conservation, adaptive reuse of
industrial cultural heritage and architectural and urban design in the vicinity of this heritage are
based. The first phase of the methodological procedure included the consideration of numerous
charters, conventions, agreements and laws concerning industrial heritage and its sustainable
preservation.
One of the most important documents that defines the role and significance of industrial
heritage in the context of general world cultural heritage and universal human values is The Nizhny
Tagil Charter for the Industrial Heritage (2003) [2]. The Nizhny Tagil Charter aligned with the
propositions of the Venice Charter (1964); Convention Concerning the Protection of the World
Cultural and Natural Heritage (1972); Convention for the Protection of the Architectural Heritage of
Europe (1985); Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003) [5–8].
Industrial heritage includes all tangible and intangible evidence; documents, structures, human
settlements, as well as nature and the built environment related to industrial processes, starting from
the second half of the 18th century to the present day, but not neglecting earlier roots in the
pre‐industrial era [2]. It has been concluded that industrial heritage has great social value, as one of
the important proofs of the life of ordinary people and their identity. It also has technological and
scientific value related to the history of production, engineering and construction, but also
significant aesthetic value in relation to its architecture, construction and planning. Industrial
heritage is often neglected and thus, devastated, because its preservation is not considered as
important as other types of heritage [18]. Therefore, the world has accepted the view that it is
necessary to identify the entire world’s industrial heritage, in order to preserve it for future
generations. In addition, it is necessary to identify different types of industry and to create
appropriate registers (with descriptions, drawings, photographs and films of the reference movable
property). It is also necessary to include people’s memories, which are often an irreplaceable source
of data and as such, should be taken into account in order to cover various aspects of sustainability
[19].
The Nizhny Tagil Charter further states that appropriate programs should be established for
industrial heritage research, in the same way as for the heritage of other historical and cultural
periods, which should be supported by appropriate state policy [2].
International cooperation is of great importance for the research and evaluation of industrial
heritage, especially in the form of coordination, use and evaluation of common sources. Since
industrial heritage is an integral part of cultural heritage, it is necessary to protect it by special legal
acts due to its specifics. These acts should enable the protection of factories and machines, structures
below and above ground, complexes and ensembles of buildings and the industrial environment.
Industrial heritage conservation programs should be part of the general policy of economic
development at the regional and national level. Therefore, governments should establish a special
advisory body, which will give an independent opinion on the protection and revitalization of
industrial heritage [2]. It is considered that examples of industrial heritage with exceptional values
should be fully protected and that no interventions should be allowed on them, which would
jeopardize their integrity and authenticity.
Authenticity is one of the basic qualifying factors in assessing the value of cultural heritage. It is
the absolute value of a cultural asset that recommends it for inscription on the List of World Cultural
and Natural Heritage [6]. Authenticity refers to a large number of criteria, such as the concept of
spatial organization, structure of the building, stylistic elements on the building, applied materials,
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
7 of 36
method of execution, ambience and environment. Some parameters that relate to intangible values
are added to these ones, such as tradition, customs, spirit and sense of place. Authenticity cannot be
observed in relation to one of the given criteria, but should represent the necessity of forming a joint
critical judgement in relation to all criteria [20,21]. Proper understanding of authenticity plays a
fundamental role in all scientific studies of cultural heritage, in planning, protection and
revitalization projects.
Another important factor for the preservation of cultural heritage is the notion of integrity,
which is a measure of the coherence and wholeness of natural and/or cultural heritage and its
features. Both principles, authenticity and integrity, are focused on the ability of the observed
cultural good to convey its significance. In the case of authenticity, it refers to the significance and
cultural‐historical value, and in the case of integrity, to the management and maintenance of the site
so as to ensure its significance and cultural value over time. This means that a proper understanding
of the principles of authenticity and integrity in projects implies respect for the existing values of
historical complexes and buildings, as well as their adequate inclusion in the processes of
valorization and adaptive reuse in accordance with modern times. The main goal of the protection of
cultural goods is to transfer the value of the historical place and to include it in modern life in an
adequate, sustainable and economical way. In that sense, the students were guided by respecting
these principles of protection and revitalization, by preserving the spatial organization, construction,
stylistic elements, as well as by the intangible values of the Mint “A.D.” during their projects, which
will be discussed in more detail in the following sections.
For this reason, renovations with measure and reusability are recommended as a convenient
and cost‐effective way for the survival of industrial buildings, and this should be encouraged by
appropriate regulations, technical advice, incentive fees and patronage. The conservation of
industrial heritage also depends on the preservation of the functional integrity of the heritage, and
all possible measures should be taken to maintain it for as long as possible. The value and
authenticity of a factory will be significantly reduced if machines and other equipment are taken out
of it, as well as if auxiliary facilities that are part of the whole are destroyed. For this reason, in situ
conservation is a priority [2].
The Nizhny Tagil Charter largely emphasized the importance of ensuring an appropriate
positive public attitude towards industrial heritage. This signifies that the meaning and importance
of industrial heritage should be actively explained, through publications, exhibitions, media,
providing insight into the most important factories and other plants, with the promotion of
sightseeing tours. Industrial heritage has a special cultural and tourist significance in terms of
encouraging and activating the tourist development of urban areas in which it is located [22,23].
The next important document is Council of Europe Resolution 1924 for Industrial Heritage in Europe
(2013), which emphasizes the importance of tangible and intangible components of industrial
heritage through a common industrial heritage in all European countries [4]. Within this context of
common values and common European heritage, Serbia participates in connecting its industrial
heritage with other European countries, unlike non‐European countries, where the process of
industrialization took place in a different way [24].
For the research of the case study of the Mint “A.D.”, we especially considered the following
items of the Resolution 1924 (2013) which refer to: establishment of interdisciplinary research
methods and multidisciplinary teams (4.4., 4.8.), treatment of industrial heritage sites as part of a
wider social landscape interconnected with skills and local memory and identity (4.7.), measures to
guarantee compliance with the character and integrity of buildings, as well as the character of the
community (4.12.) regarding the partnership and interaction with other cultural resources and
cultural heritage sites (4.14.) [4]. In item 5.1., special attention was paid to the role of cooperation
between the European Union and UNESCO regarding the implementation of the Convention on the
Value of Cultural Heritage for Society and the European Landscape Convention [25,26]. It is especially
important to pay attention to environmental and sustainable aspects, and study which is the best
way to reconcile ecological measures, building standards and risk prevention norms with the
preservation of the integrity of industrial heritage (5.3.6) [4].
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
8 of 36
The European Urban Charter II (2008) points out that factories and machines from the
industrialization period are often a neglected part of urban heritage. Industrial heritage as part of
urban heritage is considered as an irreplaceable element of the urban fabric, essential for the city’s
identity. Therefore, adaptive reuse of old, industrial buildings and urban heritage can lead to
economic approaches that include innovative mechanisms and partnerships, and thus, lead to
successful urban economic regeneration [27].
One of the most important associations is International Committee for the Conservation of the
Industrial Heritage (TICCIH), which is an international body that includes historians, conservators,
curators, architects, archaeologists, students, teachers, and heritage professionals with an interest in
the development and conservation of industry and industrial society. Although TICCIH includes
both individuals and institutions, it is organized through national associations in those countries
where there is a recognized national body for industrial heritage [28]. The role of TICCIH is to
promote, protect and research the industrial heritage through research, publications and congresses.
Serbia has recently become a member of TICCIH, and through some industrial companies and NGO
initiatives in the last decade, Serbia has maintained regular contacts with TICCIH. Serbia
participated in the 2018 TICCIH 2018 Congress held in Santiago de Chile [29]. In 2014, an agreement
was signed between TICCIH and ICOMOS in order to form a general framework of cooperation
activities, events, meetings and information exchange [30]. In line with the efforts of TICCIH, the
role of the selected case study of the Mint “A.D.” contributes to the building of a national knowledge
fund on the protection of industrial heritage. With its methodology and materials on which the
research relies, this paper contributes through educational projects.
Due to the high concentration of industrial heritage on the Belgrade riverfront, the urban area,
stretching from the Belgrade Fortress to Ada Ciganlija Lake, can be treated as a kind of authentic
industrial landscape. Having that in mind, in our paper, we have relied on numerous conventions,
charters, declarations and recommendations, especially the ERIH Master Plan European Route of
Industrial Heritage (2001), the ERIH Declaration of Duisburg (2001), the TICCIH Nizhny Tagil Charter for
the Industrial Heritage (2003), the ICOMOS Charter on Cultural Routes (2008), the UNESCO
Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape (2011), The European Landscape Convention (2000);
Convention for the Protection of the Architectural Heritage of Europe (1985), etc., [2,7,31–39].
This methodology of work has enabled us to look at the wider area of the Mint “A.D.” in a
comparative way regarding cultural heritage and its social, environmental, economic and tourist
potentials, in its integrity and integration with the natural environment and new urban structures.
Therefore, in future development, the best protection of this area would be achieved if the industrial
heritage of the Belgrade riverfront was viewed not from the aspect of the single monument, but as a
unique industrial heritage site with significant relationships associated with its natural, cultural and
historical setting [33]. Something similar was done in Germany in the Ruhr area—the Route
Industriekultur was developed, which united 52 sites and 25 locations of industrial heritage. The
project was implemented in 1999 by the regional association Regionalverband Ruhr [40]. The ERIH
Executive Summary for European Route of Industrial Heritage begins with the words of a famous English
poet William Blake, “I see the Past, Present and Future existing all at once before me” [32]. This
profound thought best illustrates the pretensions of the European Route of Industrial Heritage
(ERIH), an international organization established in 1999 with the enlightening goal to promote
industrial heritage and culture through the networking of existing sites, with appropriate
interpretation, information and signposting to enhance their tourism potential [32]. At the turn of the
third millennium, the historical, cultural, intellectual‐educational and tourist‐recreational attitude
towards the industrial heritage of the past centuries has changed a lot, which is confirmed by the
ERIH Declaration of Duisburg. It emphasizes the importance of connecting European countries with
regard to the protection of Europe’s industrial heritage as a witness to European common history
and identity [32]. The Declaration of Duisburg especially stresses the urgency of implementing
sustainable redevelopment of industrial monuments and sites, advocating for a sustainable future in
spatial planning, cultural heritage tourism and recreation, creating both shared and individual
identities of nations [32].
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
9 of 36
The most important action plan of global effort regarding the common sustainable future of
people and the planet is the Agenda Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development [41]. The 2030 Agenda relies on other legal acts such as: Rio Declaration on Environment
and Development (1992), the World Summit for Social Development (1995), the Programme of Action of the
International Conference on Population and Development (1994) and United Nations Conference on
Sustainable Development Rio+20 (2012) [42–45]. The 2030 Agenda contains 17 Sustainable Development
Goals and 169 targets, which are based on the Millennium Declaration (2000) [46]. The 2030 Agenda
seeks to achieve what the Millennium Development Goals have failed to achieve. The 2030 Agenda
highlights economic, social and environmental as three key dimensions of sustainable development.
The 2030 Agenda is linked to the Paris Agreement (2015) and the Kyoto Protocol (1997, entered into force
in 2005), which represent the Framework Convention on Climate Change [47,48].
In terms of the essence of the Kyoto Protocol—carbon emissions and greenhouse effects—the
countries of Eastern Europe are having a hard time meeting the requirements of this Convention
with all their efforts. The Republic of Serbia ratified the Kyoto Protocol in 2007 [49]. The Kyoto
Protocol is linked to the Doha Amendment, which was adopted for a second commitment period,
starting in 2013 and lasting until 2020 [50]. Since 2010, Serbia has introduced the Clean Development
Mechanism (CDM), which helps developed countries meet their commitments to reduce emissions
and assist developing countries in achieving sustainable development.
The global climate has changed drastically in the last 200 years as a result of the industrial
revolution. The negative consequences of global warming have greatly changed the philosophy,
approaches and way of thinking in architectural construction, civil engineering and urban planning.
For architecture and urbanism, the standing point of the Kyoto Protocol is very important. It is based
on common but differentiated responsibilities, and emphasizes that each country has different
capabilities in combating climate change, primarily depending on the level of economic
development obligation to reduce GHG emissions.
In recent years, special attention from conservation institutions and experts engaged in the
research and protection of cultural heritage has been focused on intangible cultural goods.
Intangible aspects of industrial cultural heritage are also recognized in the Convention for the
Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003) [8]. In the methodology of researching the
possibilities of preservation and architectural and urban reuse of the Mint “A.D.”, we put special
emphasis on its intangible components, believing that human skills and production technologies
carried out by workers in obsolete industrial production are of key importance, and they need to be
adequately recorded, preserved and passed on to young generations.
The great wealth that lies in the intangible aspects of architectural heritage is often poorly used
when it comes to renovation and reuse of architectural heritage. Given that in architecture,
intangible heritage is inextricably linked to material tangible heritage, in this paper, we advocate an
integral approach that will provide the importance of both the tangible and intangible assets of
industrial heritage. The promotion of intangible components of industrial heritage in our case study
creates multifaceted opportunities for creative and economically progressive development.
Intangible heritage can be a very original management and branding tool for urban development,
tourism, culture, entertainment, recreation, catering, etc., [17,51,52]. Cultural content is a valuable
asset that can become a driving force if it is used to establish a “creative city”, in cases of urban reuse
[53].
In the management of the processes of urban reuse and planned development of the considered
zones of the Belgrade riverfront around the Mint “A.D.”, public, private and local community
interests were taken into account. Decision‐making strategies for urban development of the Belgrade
riverfront for the case study of the Mint “A.D.” are focused on bottom‐up approaches, and not on
top‐down approaches that favor only the economic level of greater profitability, while not caring for
authenticity, integrity, social, cultural, conservation, historical, symbolic, aesthetic and
environmental values of architecture [54,55].
In order to explain, as precisely as possible, the stages of the methodological process, we
created a diagram of values, principles and charters that regulate the system of protection,
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
10 of 36
revitalization and presentation of industrial heritage, which we used in our work. The diagram
(Figure 2) shows those charters that are most relevant for the research of industrial heritage as an
element of an authentic and integrative sustainable wholeness of the architectural, urban and
natural environment. The presented diagram illustrates the methodology of work on the course
History and Theory 1—Visual Culture in Architectural Theory and Practice, which concerns the selection
of those charters and legal regulations that are important for adaptive reuse and revitalization of
industrial heritage in practice. The theoretical work carried out by the teaching staff through lectures
is cyclically connected with the practical mentoring work on the development of revitalization
projects for the Mint “A.D.”. It is a cyclical methodological process that consists of the following
units: (1) theoretical teaching and acquisition of knowledge, (2) application of theoretical and
research knowledge in practice—project design, and (3) practice, i.e., the presented projects are
followed by information and new knowledge that serve to create new and revise existing theoretical
knowledge.
Figure 2. Diagram of the value of principles and international charters and recommendations in the
field of protection, revitalization and presentation of industrial heritage.
The mentioned charters on industrial heritage more closely determine the attitude towards the
preservation of industrial heritage, whose complexes and buildings have significant historical,
cultural, urban, architectural, memorial and technical values. Charters and guidelines related to the
interpretation of the main principles of protection and revitalization of cultural heritage can be
singled out, primarily the interpretation of the concept of preserving the authenticity of a monument
and its monumental values, through preserving the spatial organization, structure and stylistic
elements of the building. Charters have also been appointed that more closely define the approaches
to preserving the intangible heritage—the spirit of the place—because such spaces preserve
important evidence of social and sociocultural values, through elements of tradition, customs, and
people’s way of life. It is especially important to point out the charters and guidelines related to the
development of cultural tourism, as well as cultural roots of industrial heritage. The mentioned
charters and guidelines in the diagram are current and recent, and the students were introduced to
current international charters and recommendations in the field of preservation and protection of
industrial heritage through lectures, which was a good theoretical basis for their further work on the
conceptual solutions for the Mint “A.D.”. The diagram shows a relation between international
documents, the principles of protection and revitalization, as well as the monumental values of the
historic site. In this way, we would like to point out to all professionals and future researchers, that it
is necessary to use the guidelines given in these documents, as well as to respect and preserve
monumental values through valorization, with mandatory respect for the most important principles
of protection and revitalization based on preserving the authenticity and integrity of the historic site.
The ultimate goal should be the revival of the monument and its inclusion in modern life, while
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
11 of 36
always taking into account projects that will not violate these principles, which will enable the
cost‐effectiveness of such interventions.
2.2. Practical Framework—Methodology of work on the elective course History and Theory 1—Visual Culture
in Architectural Theory and Practice
For many years at the University of Belgrade— Faculty of Architecture, students of master and
integrated academic studies of architecture, within elective courses in the field of protection,
revitalization and study of architectural heritage, have the opportunity to expand their knowledge
acquired in basic academic studies in architecture history and art. Through various topics and types
of architectural heritage, students have the opportunity to apply their acquired knowledge in
projects of revitalization and presentation of historical spaces through concrete examples (Figure 3).
In addition to various topics related to the ancient and medieval heritage in Serbia, students are
given tasks and topics related to industrial heritage in Belgrade. During previous years, students
have given very important ideas related to the renovation, revitalization and presentation of
important buildings of industrial architecture, which are in very poor condition today, such as the
Foundry “Pantelić” in Zemun and the Art Foundry “Skulptura” in Belgrade [56,57].
In the fall semester of the school year 2019/2020, at the University of Belgrade—Faculty of
Architecture, we realized a course in the first year of master’s academic or fourth year of integrated
academic studies of architecture entitled History and Theory 1—Visual Culture in Architectural Theory
and Practice.
The topic of research on the subject in this school year was related to the study of industrial
heritage on the territory of the city of Belgrade, through the case study of the Mint “A.D.” and the
possibilities of its protection, revitalization and presentation.
The students started their work by site research, research of the literature and of internet
sources, in order to get better acquainted with the specifics of significant examples of industrial
architecture in the world and in Belgrade. After researching the location, the students performed
analyses of the cultural‐historical, urban, architectural and technical values of the Mint “A.D.” area
and its surroundings, as well as an analysis of the current approach to the protection and
presentation of this complex. Through lectures, students were introduced to the process of
valorization of industrial facilities, so after collecting data on the example that will be processed (the
Mint “A.D.”), they focused on the valorization of the complex. They conceptualized their own views
and ideas about this complex. After collecting basic data on the historical, urban and architectural
development of the industrial complex of the Mint “A.D.” and site research, students presented the
results of their research with special emphasis on valorization and highlighting its values that
should be incorporated into future proposals for renovation and revitalization of this important
industrial heritage. Based on the results of the research, they proceeded to work on the design of
proposals for modern interventions, i.e., defining the character of the future arrangement and
presentation of the Mint “A.D.” complex.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
12 of 36
Figure 3. Methodology of work on research, protection, revitalization and presentation of historical
sites and buildings.
3. Results
3.1. Industrial Heritage of Belgrade—Historical Overview
Belgrade is the capital of the Republic of Serbia, located in the southeastern part of Europe, at
the confluence of two important European rivers—the Danube and the Sava. Its position throughout
history has decisively influenced the historical, cultural and urban development of the city. It is one
of the oldest cities in Europe. The first settlements on the territory of Belgrade date from the
prehistoric Vinča culture, around 4800 BC. The settlement itself was founded by the Celts in the 3rd
century BC, before it became the Roman settlement Singidunum [1,58,59]. The close connection
between the rivers and the city is one of the main elements of the specific historical and cultural
identity of Belgrade, authentic urban morphology and special characteristics of the city landscape.
The urban development of Belgrade at the beginning of the 19th century, after the establishment of
the Serbian principality and partial political autonomy within the Ottoman Empire, was connected
with the development of trade and river traffic, as well as with the establishment of the first
production workshops. The political, economic and cultural center of the Serbian population was in
the area around the Cathedral on the slope of the Sava River, in the area of Kosančićev Venac (Figure
4), the port on the Sava River and in the new part of the city called Savamala [60]. The area of the
Sava port and the riverfornt was outside the fortified historical part of the city, which was
surrounded by ramparts and a moat. The main communication link between Belgrade (in Serbia)
with the city of Zemun (in Austro‐Hungarian Monarchy) was located in the area of the Sava port.
During the 19th century, new trade and transit roads were developed in this area, where important
houses of famous merchants, hotels, customs houses, warehouses, etc., were built. The southwestern
area of the city was undeveloped, predominantly swampy ground, called “Bara Venecija” (“The
Venice Pond”).
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
13 of 36
Figure 4. Belgrade from bird’s eye view. (a) View of the Belgrade Fortress, (b) View of the Beton Hala
and an urban neighborhood Kosančićev Venac. Source: Google Earth.
After the proclamation of the Kingdom of Serbia in 1882, stronger ties were established with
Europe, especially with the Austro‐Hungarian monarchy. More and more foreign capital was
invested in Serbia and the first industrial buildings were built (Figure 5). Thanks to that, Serbia has
had constant economic growth. This was especially accelerated by the construction of the railway
from 1881 to 1884 and the first railway bridge over the Sava River (that connected Belgrade and
Zemun). The development of the railway had a decisive influence on the future development of
Serbia, and Belgrade became an important trade center and connection between Europe, Sofia and
Istanbul [60]. The biggest changes took place around the former undeveloped area of “Bara
Venecija”, which was drained, and then, in 1884, the Main Railway Station was built. The railway
that was built ran parallel to the banks of the Sava and Danube Rivers; it connected the new
industrial areas on the Danube with the railway bridge on the Sava River, but in that way, the
connection between the historical part of the city and the rivers was broken [60]. The first industrial
slaughterhouse was built on the Danube bank in 1895 [61], and the Main Railway Station is still a
significant proof of the urban, architectural and technical development of Serbia in the 19th century
[62].
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
14 of 36
Figure 5. Belgrade from bird’s eye view. (a) View of an urban renewal development project
“Belgrade Waterfront”. (b) View from the Mostar interchange at the Blvd. Vojvode Mišića. On the
left are the Old Mill/Hotel Radisson Blu and State Printing House/“BIGZ” and on the right is the
“Milan Vapa” factory. Source: Google Earth.
After the First World War, Belgrade was the capital of the new Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and
Slovenes (later, the Kingdom of Yugoslavia) and developed rapidly. However, the city lost its
centuries‐old border position and large‐scale reconstruction was planned. One of the main goals of
the city’s government was the development of modern infrastructure. The first major urban plan
was completed in 1923, and one of the main highlighted problems was traffic, especially river and
rail traffic, with such traffic being vital to the city’s successful planning, growth and development in
the future. In order to connect Belgrade with the Pannonian Basin, new bridges over the Sava and
Danube were planned [63].
At the beginning of the 20th century, there were a total of 29 industrial buildings built along the
Sava and Danube banks. During the 1920s and 1930s, that number increased very rapidly, so that in
1941, there were a total of 206 registered industrial facilities in Belgrade [64]. We can say that this
industrial heritage is part of European heritage and identity, as a large number of industrial
buildings were built by architects from Central European countries, especially Hungary, Austria,
Germany and France. The architectural typologies of buildings were similar to European ones,
although specific local elements could be noticed. One of the main industrial buildings from this
period was the new City Power Plant “Snaga i svetlost” (“Power and Light”), erected in 1932 on the
banks of the Danube [65].
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
15 of 36
Many buildings along the riverbanks were severely damaged during World War II by the
German Armed Forces in 1941, as well as by the Allied Forces in 1944. Therefore, the period
immediately after the war was characterized by the loss of almost half of the industrial factories, so
the total registered number of facilities in 1950 was up to 90. With the establishment of a new
political framework and socialist state, significant changes took place in the industrial sector. In
addition to the process of planned economy, the industrial sector was shaped by the process of
homogenization of individual locations and production facilities. The spatial distribution of the
production plants themselves remained unchanged, with a larger share of factories on the banks
along the Danube. The period of the 1960s was characterized by a constant annual growth of
industrial production, with an attempt to relocate production to suburban areas, as part of new
processes of homogenization of industrial facilities. The period of the 1970s and 1980s was
characterized by the process of relocation of industry from central urban areas, but also the opening
of new facilities on the riverbanks [64]. The period of disintegration in the 1990s significantly
increased the negative trend in the industrial sector and accelerated the processes of degradation
and closure of numerous industrial complexes. This situation was underpinned by the effects of the
war conflicts in the former Yugoslavia and the disintegration of the state, as well as the significant
impoverishment of the newly independent states that emerged from the republics of the former
Yugoslavia. With the disintegration of the former state, the Republic of Serbia and Montenegro
became one state, only to finally separate, so that today, the Republic of Serbia is an independent
state. This process, as well as the poor strategy of industrial production, further increased market
fragmentation. Industrial production fell by 20%, and the negative trend that began in the 1980s
peaked. In urban development plans, the riverbank has never been considered an integral part of the
urban fabric, and a large part of the old industrial zone is today devastated and neglected [66].
3.2. Industrial Heritage in Belgrade and the Main Challenges
Preservation of industrial architecture in Serbia is often compromised due to disrespect for their
monumental values. Since most of these buildings and sites date from the 18th to the 20th century,
they are sometimes not considered old enough to be able to direct the attention of either heritage
conservation experts or citizens and users (Figure 6). They do not understand that industrial
buildings represent their everyday environment that possess significant monumental values.
Although some efforts are being made in Serbia to find a more adequate approach, to modernize
legal and administrative systems, to integrate heritage protection into the urban planning process
[67] and to achieve greater cooperation between the protection service and the urban institute, it is
increasingly difficult to protect the endangered urban heritage, whereas preserving its authenticity
and integrity becomes a major professional task. As the preservation of cultural heritage is
integrated into laws, with the aim of involving a large number of stakeholders and citizens, in
practice, through the process of urban planning, many problems and inconsistencies in the
application of these goals can be noticed [68].
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
16 of 36
Figure 6. The map of industrial and technical heritage on the bank of the Sava River in Belgrade.
Sources: Google Earth (redrawn by authors). The photos of the Sugar factory, the Belgrade Fair and
the Beton Hala, Source: Google Earth. Other photos were taken by the authors.
Regardless of the situation and neglect, the specific historical and urban identity of the Sava and
Danube banks have been preserved to this day. This area is a basic element of the historic cityscape
of Belgrade [69], and the banks of the Sava and Danube Rivers are the focus of interest of many
planners and investors. The most important area at the confluence of the two rivers is the Belgrade
Fortress, a cultural monument of exceptional importance, [70] as well as the area of Kosančićev
Venac, a spatial, cultural and historical ensemble of great importance [71].
In order to present the diversity of industrial heritage located on the Belgrade riverfront, we
have provided a graphic display of the current state of functional representation of industrial
complexes and buildings along the Sava and Danube riverbanks (Figure 7). In our research project,
we have included the analyses of the following industrial heritage: an old industrial building called
“Beton Hala” (“Concrete Hall”) [61,72], creative district “Savamala” [73,74], the Main Railway
Station [64], the building of the State Printing House—“BIGZ” [75], the industrial complex “Old
Mill” [74], the Paper Factory of the industrialist Milan Vapa [76], the Belgrade Fair [77], the “Rad”
Tool Factory, the Sugar Factory [78], the Textile Industry Factory “Beko” [79], the old cargo port of
Belgrade, and the old Thermal Power Plant “Snaga i Svetlost” (“Power and Light”) [80,81].
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
17 of 36
Figure 7. Graphic display of the current state of functional representation of industrial complexes
and buildings along the Sava and Danube riverbanks.
Industrial complexes and buildings located along the Sava and Danube riverbanks, according
to the current state of functional representation, can be divided into four groups (Figure 7). The first
group consists of complexes and buildings that are in good condition, whose primary function is still
active. The largest group consists of complexes and buildings that have been revitalized and whose
functions are mainly related to cultural and educational facilities, business and catering. These
complexes and buildings have partially preserved their authentic appearance, with certain
interventions, in order to adapt to the new purposes. The third group refers to industrial complexes
and buildings that are out of primary function and in very poor condition. They are ruined and
abandoned, but contain numerous values that should be preserved in future revitalization and
presentation projects. The last group consists of complexes and buildings that were demolished in
order to build new structures, thus, permanently losing the authenticity and integrity of these units.
3.3. Environmental and Sustainable Aspects of Adaptive Reuse Approach in Preserving Industrial Cultural
Heritage
The attitude of one of the world’s leading architects, Sir Norman Foster, is that an ultimately
sustainable building is a building that can be recycled [82]. Instead of demolishing it, the building
can be adapted to change. To that end, the great challenge of today’s architecture is to be sustainable,
to support change, and through modern technologies and techniques to protect and revitalize old
buildings, they manage to improve their performance. To this end, Foster and Partners propose a
special architecture evaluation method, the Building Research Establishment Environmental
Assessment Method (BREEAM), which is widely used in the UK and other countries [83].
The researched case study of the Mint “A.D.” is not characterized by high authenticity in an
aesthetic and specific architectural style sense, but it is highly authentic in terms of specificity of the
natural environment (estuaries, riverbanks of the Sava and Danube, Ada Ciganlija Lake). On the
other hand, the built environment is one of the most authentic parts of Belgrade (small fishing
cottages on the banks of the Sava and Danube; Belgrade Fortress—the Old Town; the oldest zone of
Belgrade—Kosančićev Venac; Belgrade Fair—a miracle of architectural construction technologies
from the 1950s, which was declared a cultural monument; as well as numerous industrial facilities in
the area). Based on the analysis of the current situation and insight into the General Urban Plan of
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
18 of 36
Belgrade (GUP), the location of Mint “A.D.” is not integrated into the planned urban development of
the wider area of this zone [84].
When forming adequate solutions for renovation and reuse of the Mint “A.D.”, we must keep in
mind that the aesthetic appearance and physical condition of the Mint is rather inconspicuous, with
very low aesthetic features in terms of architecture. Precisely for this reason, aesthetic and
architectural style criteria for the protection of this cultural property are quite low, so protection and
preservation should rely on emphasizing the intangible values of this building. It should also be
kept in mind that, with industrial buildings in the immediate vicinity, this building participates as
an integral and a significant element of the industrial landscape on the urban stretch from Belgrade
Fortress to the Ada Ciganlija Lake.
If the protection and preservation of the Mint “A.D.” is viewed from an environmental
standpoint as a single entity of the urban industrial landscape within which intangible values are
preserved and reuse and renovation are adequately applied, conditions will be created to preserve
the authenticity and integrity of this zone. This would save the Mint from a very probable
demolition. Therefore, designing an adequate presentation of intangible values of the Mint “A.D.”,
involving interesting storytelling, manifestations and cultural events, guiding through the exhibition
space that will evoke the historical side of the development of industrial production in Belgrade
between the two world wars, will create an incentive for adequate reconstruction, aesthetic and
visual integrity of the place. Preservation and renovation of the Mint as part of the historic urban
landscape fulfills the UNESCO Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape by including the Mint
“A.D.” in the broader urban context and its geographical setting, taking into account the historical
layering of cultural and natural values and attributes [85].
Sustainability in terms of culture and architecture as an important domain of culture, in our
case study of the Mint “A.D.”, is achieved through adaptive reuse. The concept of adaptive reuse of
architectural heritage represents a change in the use of exiting construction or structures according
to the needs of new or existing owners, with the aim of achieving improvements in environmental,
economic and social sustainability [86]. According to some authors, adaptive reuse represents a
change in the original purpose of the building, which achieves the goal of gaining space, thus,
achieving greater efficiency and cost‐effectiveness of the space itself, which receives a new purpose
[87]. Thus, urban regeneration prolongs the life of the building and avoids demolition and waste
generation, saves the mechanization and energy needed for a new building from the scratch, and
also produces numerous social and economic benefits for the community. Industrial heritage can
play a very important role in the economic regeneration of decayed or declining areas. Reuse of this
heritage may provide psychological stability for the local community [53]. The creative industries
contribute greatly to people wellbeing both socially and economically. In addition to economic
wellbeing, which is a financial category whose indicators show the level of economic growth, there
are also those aspects of valorization of cultural heritage that are difficult to assess economically and
fall into the social wellbeing category [88]. Indicators that point to wellbeing provide information on
quality of life, happiness, mental health and the fulfillment of certain needs of citizens. Citizen
engagement and participation in issues related to the development of their environment greatly
improves their wellbeing. Therefore, in architectural heritage reuse and preservation projects, it is of
great importance to achieve social fulfillment of human rights and needs, because mental health has
a very important role in the achievement of global Sustainable Development Goals [89].
In the work on the preservation and reuse of the Mint “A.D.”, we had in mind the Brundtland
Report, which views environment and development as two inseparable terms—“environment” as
the place where we all live, and “development” as what we all do in an attempt to improve our lot
within that abode [90]. We were guided by the idea that sustainability is a “shared territory” because
it interacts with diverse stakeholder groups, showing how different interests can be resolved in a
compromised way through creative and sustainable solutions [91]. Therefore, the presented projects
try to revive the spirit of the place and give it an additional new identity adapted to modern times
and needs. As significant experiences, we examined numerous examples from around the world
regarding to what extent certain industrial spaces have become the main artistic, cultural, social and
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
19 of 36
tourist meeting points of the city through the use of creative adaptive reuse and creative
management [92–96].
It is also very important to pay attention to the preservation of the natural environment of the
treated zone, given that the zone where the Mint “A.D.” is located is in a natural environment, near
rivers, with specific vegetation in the form of low and high greenery. One of the key conditions
imposed is the preservation of the natural integrity of the coastal zone. In order to harmonize and
sustainably fit into the built and natural environment with the aim of achieving the most adequate,
sustainable and high quality of new, preserved and natural assets, the preservation and reuse of the
Mint “A.D.” should focus on creative methods of conservation, development and inclusion of this
hitherto non‐functional industrial space in the development of a creative city. Applying the concept
of creative industries, this research points to new possibilities of the global post‐industrial society,
which develops on the principles of sustainable economy and environmental sustainable societies,
and thus, presents a new cultural basis of the future seen through the unity of economy, production,
culture, education and care for the environment for future generations [97].
Environmental Aesthetics and Ethical Positions in Preservation of Architectural Cultural Heritage
Architecture is a complex activity that covers very broad issues from sociological, economic,
artistic, technical, technological, aesthetic, ethical, psychological, health, historical to environmental,
ecological and sustainable aspects. Most often, priority is given to the aesthetic aspect of
architecture, since architecture is a visual art and technical discipline that is perceived through the
senses of sight, but also through the perception of the atmosphere in the environment that is built
through architecture. It should be noted that the aesthetic role of architecture in the context of
environmentalism includes the ethical role of architecture. Ethics of architecture is a very ambivalent
discipline that depends on the context and various factors. What we try to emphasize in the
valorization of preservation and protection of industrial heritage is focused on ethical issues of the
environment from the aspect of social inclusion, natural and economic ethics of the environment
which we may characterize as sustainable [98]. In that sense, instead of trying to conquer nature as
architecture indisputably does, man should strive to fit architecture into nature, that is, to adapt the
construction to the topography and climatic conditions of naturally created environments. In today’s
world, the economic imperative in architecture has priority. First of all, what is built must meet the
requirements of market profitability to the maximum. Economic values are usually in conflict with
the symbolic, aesthetic and ethical dimensions of architecture, but in planning and designing in a
sustainable way, all these aspects tend to be brought into a reasonable balance. Practical and
functionalist requirements of architecture that had priority in the era of modernism and
postmodernism even today, must be harmonized with the general and higher goals of
environmentalism and sustainability. Architecture needs to be reformed, and that is a new way of
architecture in its reevaluation and care for man, which should not, as it often was, stay only on
paper—utopia—but should harmonize with the economic imperatives of today. It is about the
survival of the human community in the way proposed by the Agenda for Transforming Our World:
the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, according to which, architecture should meet the
requirements for equality and a healthy environment, sustainable management of natural resources,
economic, social and technological prosperity in harmony with nature, for the sake of peaceful, just
and inclusive societies in which a solidary partnership of all stakeholders and all people is
developed [41].
Therefore, the ethical and aesthetic aspects of architecture must intertwine, as it is necessary to
identify the relevant shared values of both these disciplines [99]. Environmental aesthetics and
environmental ethics should be positions of significant importance for urban planning, design and
protection of architectural and cultural assets and urban units.
Respecting environmental goals, architects and conservators should act and design for
sustainable use and reuse of resources. With regard to the protection of large spatial units, it is
important to consult Declaration on the Conservation of the Setting of Heritage Structures, Sites and Areas
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
20 of 36
(2005), which prescribes the adequacy of care and management of cultural heritage structures
occupying large spatial frameworks (historic cities, landscapes, seascapes, cultural routes,
archeological sites), having in mind their protection in the time of accelerated changes and
development of townscapes and landscapes [36]. Considering that Belgrade’s industrial heritage on
the riverfront has a distinctive character that is related to the authentic natural environment located
on the banks of rivers and near the historic core of the city, this industrial heritage has a special
meaning and historic values. In that context, as a part of the industrial heritage of Belgrade, the Mint
“A.D.” possesses an authentic spirit of the place, as well as special symbolic and cultural values that
represent significant resources for creative, economic and cultural development [39].
3.4. Educational Student Projects of Preservation, Regeneration and Presentation of the Old Mint “A.D.”
3.4.1. Analysis of Cultural and Historical Values of the Mint AD, its Surroundings and Presentation
of the Location in the Strategic Plan of Spatial Development of Belgrade
Mint A.D. is located in the Belgrade municipality of Savski Venac. The municipality of Savski
Venac is one of the oldest municipalities in Belgrade, as its coastal parts were the first urban tissues.
When the first Serbian prince Miloš Obrenović (1780–1860) settled in Topčider, a part of the city
municipality of Savski Venac, in the 19th century, it was obvious that Belgrade would develop in
that direction [100]. With the establishment of this social construction, many first things in Belgrade
appeared in Savski Venac, namely the first hospitals, the first tram lines, the first theaters, cafés and
markets and the first ministry [100]. In the area of the municipality of Savski Venac, there are some
of the most important cultural institutions of the society, such as the Yugoslav Drama Theater,
Student Cultural Center, scientific and social institutions such as the Palace of Justice and the main
facilities of court infrastructure, a cultural monument—the State Printing House—“BIGZ”,
commercial facilities such as the Belgrade Beer Industry, the Banknote Production Institute, and
numerous hotels and restaurants. The proximity of natural resorts, Topčider and Košutnjak, as well
as good connections with other parts of the city, are important for the possibility of reviving
important facilities and connecting with significant historical areas which are located there, the
revitalization of which would contribute to the cultural development of the city and its revival [100].
During the Kingdom of Yugoslavia (1918–1945), a predominant part of the housing stock of the
settlement was built in this part of the city, and many Yugoslav post‐war architects took an
individual part in shaping this part of the city [101].
The Mint “A.D.”, which is located on Bulevar Vojvode Mišića Street, has a good connection
with the other side of the river, because it is located between two bridges—one is the “Bridge on
Ada” and the other is the “Gazela” bridge. Bulevar Vojvode Mišića Street continues to Savska Street,
which is a connection with the old part of the city with the center in Knez Mihailova Street. The area
of Mostar interchange and Bulevar Vojvode Mišića are important areas of Belgrade. The Mostar
interchange began to disappear with the construction of the modern Bulevar Vojvode Mišića Street,
then the large complex of the Belgrade Fair and finally, the construction of the “Gazela” bridge in
1968–1970, which brought the highway to the city along with noise, smog and pollution [58].
As opposed to the cultural‐historical context, there is the current planning strategic
framework—General Urban Plan of Belgrade. The General Urban Plan of Belgrade (GUP) is the main
urban plan that implements protocols and procedures and plans the effects of city development by
contextualizing urban‐architectural practice within institutions, society and everyday life.
The morphological peculiarity of the spatial whole of the city municipality of Savski Venac
determined this space for specific purposes—family and residential housing. The General Plan of
Belgrade notes that this whole area is characterized by a large number of architectural works that
have been declared cultural goods or enjoyed previous protection. There is the presence of clinical
and hospital institutions and large landscaped park and forest areas, of which the Topčider complex
is protected as a cultural asset of exceptional importance. In that whole area, certain tree lines and
individual trees are protected as natural monuments. According to the General Urban Plan, the
largest part of this whole area is defined as a permanent asset of Belgrade and as such, is unique for
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
21 of 36
the city. Parameters of a high degree of protection and ambient integrity mark all future
interventions and activities in this area [84].
According to the General Urban Plan of Belgrade, parts of the municipality of Savski Venac
(among which, Bulevar Vojvode Mišića Street is mentioned) represent an area where a large number
of cultural goods and units that enjoy protection are concentrated. In this regard, a “general
renovation” is envisaged for this area, which implies the application of integrative conservation,
urban renewal and spatial planning, which is harmonized according to the scope and new value of
architectural heritage [84].
3.4.2. Results of the Educational Projects for the Revitalization of the Old Mint “A.D.”
The architect of the Mint “A.D.” (Figure 8) is Bogdan Nestorović (1901–1975, Belgrade), a
Serbian architect, author of several books on the history of architecture and a university professor.
During his long and fruitful career, he designed some of the most important buildings, such as: the
Craft Home (1931–1933, today Radio Belgrade), the Privileged Export Joint Stock Company (1938,
today the Tanjug building), the Cathedral of St. Sava with prof. arch. Aleksandar Deroko
(1926–1927). He is the author of a large number of professional papers and books, ranging from
general to national history of architecture, some of the most important being the following:
Architecture of the Old Century (1952), Architecture of the New Century (1964) and Architecture of Serbia in
the 19th Century (published in 2006). In 1971, he received the Lifetime Achievement Award [101].
Figure 8. Drone view of the mint “A.D.” (photo: student Radojević Marko).
After the conditions for the construction of the Mint “A.D.” were met, in 1930, a joint stock
company erected the Mint building at 43 Bulevar Vojvode Mišića Street. The building was designed
in the modern spirit that Bogdan Nestorović applied to his other buildings from this period [102].
The Mint “A.D.” is dominated by the central corridor leading to all rooms within the building.
After passing through the part with auxiliary and administrative premises, you enter the part of the
production facility that extends from the left and right side of the corridor all the way to the
economic entrance in the south (Figure 9).
The students analyzed the available technical documentation and it was determined that the
building was built in a masonry construction and system of load‐bearing longitudinal walls. The
primary materials used in the construction are brick and concrete. As an adequate support, strip
foundations without a basement were formed. The roof is made of wood with a king post roof truss.
Several buildings can be recognized on the building plot, which were created later in the service
of the main building. Access to the main building is provided from Bulevar Vojvode Mišića Street
through the main entrance, or economically through the courtyard. Inside the courtyard, in addition
to the guard building which is drawn in the plans, there are annexes on the building, as an extension
of the main room, which bears the purpose of a mint. In addition to these two facilities, additional
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
22 of 36
rooms were built at the bottom, which served as offices and workshops for the later purpose of this
building, the public metal company “Titan”.
Figure 9. Current interior condition of the mint “A.D.” (photos: students Petrović Nevena, Jeremić
Teodora, Radenković Emilija and Jovančević Milica).
Review of student projects
Group 1—The Educational Museum Project originated from the intention to form a new
modern museum space with maximum preservation of the architectural heritage, along with spaces
intended for education, both for children and other citizens and tourists (Figure 10).
The interior space has been adapted to the future function through the planning of various
facilities, namely workshops, gardens, galleries, souvenir shops and cafés, which would further lead
to a permanent outdoor exhibition. Light and transparent materials would be a replacement for a
large part of solid walls. By replacing the internal massive walls with a glass surface, direct
communication of the observers with the exhibits is established.
A gallery is planned that would be completely passable and useful. The new steel roof structure
was raised to a higher height, which created a pleasant ambience of the gallery, becoming a
multifunctional space with variable purposes. The proposal is to organize lectures and workshops
on this floor, where visitors would be introduced to the history, functioning and process of making
money that took place at the mint.
There is a direct exit from the museum space to the inner garden. The idea is that the garden
contains a space for rest, regarding which a pergola is planned in the area of the garden and where
urban furniture is also planned. In the other part of the yard, there is an attractive exhibition of
permanent exhibits, which includes machines that are no longer in function.
In order to preserve the value of the original building, which is an important element in the
approach to the revitalization of industrial buildings, the project seeks to preserve the original
facade of the mint as well as the preservation of machines that participated in production. The goal
was to preserve the original appearance of the factory with changes in floor height, roof construction
and hollowing out of the facade for the purpose of additional lighting. In order to emphasize the old
facade and enclose the expanded space, the project envisages a curtain wall in the form of a “double
facade”.
In addition to tourists, the largest target group would be children and young people, whose
awareness of the importance of industrial architectural heritage is increased through lectures and
interactive workshops.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
23 of 36
Figure 10. (a) Floor plan; (b) Section; (c) Exploded axonometric of the revitalized condition of the
mint “A.D.” (authors: students Vićentijević Vanja, Luković Mila, Plećević Tamara and Ristić Milena).
Group 2—The project of a modern theater as the primary carrier of revitalization of this project
originated due to the significant height of the building (about 5 m) and its spaciousness. With the
aim of achieving a greater degree of ambience, scenicity was identified as a key character in forming
future identity (Figure 11).
Spatial reorganization would to some extent preserve the original organizational scheme of the
building. It is envisaged that the main corridor, which is the main carrier of the spatial organization,
would retain its primary communication function, and, along with the foyer, it would become part
of the exhibition and gain not only a communication, but also an educational character.
In other words, the foyer has the primary task of accepting the audience for the upcoming
show, and along the way, introducing them to the history of the mint through archival photographs
(in the form of an exhibition space) as well as video projections/holograms that testify to the way
man tempered his identity through the minting process. A support for this program is the gallery
space (existing), which provides additional information to users about coins, medallions and other
representative objects of numismatic association. The former premises of the workshop are united in
one large room, which is given the function of a theater. A ballet and stage rehearsal hall is planned
for the new purpose of the smelter.
The spatial capacity is expanded by adding an open‐air amphitheater that is connected to the
building by a passage.
Within the base of the floor, there is a gallery above the foyer, which is intended for sitting and
also forms part of the educational zone. In the room with the stage, a gallery space is added, which is
intended as a multimedia space. At the same time, parallel to the rear facade of the building, there
are workshops for costumes and scenography in the form of annexes.
The intervention in the construction was first reflected in the replacement of the massive wall of
the corridor with pillars, which led to the opening of space for the purpose of exhibition and
education. In order to form the theater stage and accompanying rooms, the partition walls of the
mint’s working spaces were demolished, which resulted in one larger room.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
24 of 36
The roof structure has been completely replaced by a steel structure, with the addition of a
lantern above the foyer. The construction of the newly created gallery above the foyer consists of a
combined ceiling with steel steps. At the external annex to the building, a glass narthex has been
added, which allows part of the space to be used in winter as well.
The main change that characterizes this spatial intervention refers to the hollowing of the wall
that forms the central horizontal communication, and the introduction of a series of pillars. The
intention that established such a spatial treatment was to integrate the recognized longitudinality
with the lateral segment, while forming the cooperation of the educational and exhibition zone.
The original facade of the building has been completely preserved with the necessary repairs.
Brick is the main material used. The roof covering is galvanized sheet metal. The windows were also
retained with the necessary repairs. A glass annex was formed on the south facade, which is
intended for a costume design workshop.
Figure 11. (a) Floor plan; (b) Section; (c) Exploded axonometric; (d) 3D model of the revitalized
condition of the mint “A.D.” (authors: students Petrović Nevena, Jeremić Teodora, Radenković
Emilija and Jovančević Milica).
Group 3—The basic idea of this project is the revitalization of the old mint building into a
cultural and catering space (Figure 12). The position of the main communication corridor has been
retained on the ground floor, with cultural and catering facilities added on the left and right sides.
The visual identity of the main corridor should point out to the visitors the historical significance of
the mint through the exhibition part that is located in it. That part of the building is actually an
introduction to an even larger exhibition space that is separated from the hall by movable walls. On
the other side of the hall, workshops are planned, where visitors will have the opportunity to get
acquainted with the way of making old crafts through expert guidance. Additionally, on the ground
floor, there is a catering space, a sanitary part and offices. The base of the gallery is intended
exclusively for visitors and contains a library and a space for sitting and reading.
Figure 12. (a) Urbanistic situation/Floor plan; (b) Depiction of the revitalized condition of the mint
“A.D.” (authors: students Savić Mima, Benić Ksenija, Bogunović Danica and Radojević Marko).
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
25 of 36
In the construction of the building, the aim was to keep it as much as possible even after the
revitalization for the sake of authenticity and to increase the visual attractiveness of the space itself.
This retained the entire structure, which consists of a system of concrete pillars and beams, as well as
all internal load‐bearing walls with brick infill. Partition walls have been completely removed in
many places, while in some parts, they have been replaced by prefabricated or movable walls, which
can be moved depending on the function to be performed in a certain part of the building. The roof
structure has been renovated with a steel grid construction, which lies on the basic structure of the
building—concrete pillars—and supports the roof. In that way, the load is transferred from the roof
to the steel grid, and then, it is transferred to the concrete foundations of the building through
concrete pillars and walls.
The facade itself remained unchanged in shape, as did all the openings, including the doors and
windows. What makes this space stand out, among other things, is the visual treatment of its
surfaces. Namely, by looking at the history and function of the building, that is, the fact that
industrial activity was performed in this building, it led to the idea of a black facade of the building.
Then, in the interior, a contrast was made in colors, black and white (Figure 13). In terms of
materialization, all materials used in the construction of the original building were retained, and
during the revitalization of the building, the walls retained concrete pillars and brick infill. The roof
structure has been renovated with steel grids that are visible and especially contribute to the
appearance of the entire space. A small part of the building was demolished and modernized with
glass walls that enable better lighting of part of the interior space and transparent reading of the
spatial organization.
Figure 13. (a) Interior model 1; (b) Interior model 2 (authors: students Savić Mima, Benić Ksenija,
Bogunović Danica and Radojević Marko).
Group 4—In terms of revitalization, this project was guided by the idea of creating an
interactive exhibition space (Figure 14). The basic idea is that, in addition to exhibition activities, the
space also includes various film, art, theater projections, performing arts and debates. The project
proposes the removal of partition walls and the opening of space. In that way, the functions were
networked, and the impression of a larger and more spacious interior was created.
The project envisages a gallery at elevation +2.50 from the level of the finished ground floor,
which received an administrative function and is connected to the courtyard of the building by an
external spiral staircase at the back of the building and to the ground floor by a steel interior
staircase. In the gallery itself, an administrative block is planned in the form of open office spaces
that can be separated by a glass accordion partition from the rest of the floor (toilet, kitchenette and
terrace), from which you can also access the floor, climbing the steel spiral staircase from the
courtyard.
The part of the building below the gallery is intended for projections and presentations and is
separated from the exhibition space by glass panels, which also enables communication and
interaction between functions, while the glass facade is open to the courtyard and thus, enables view
of greenery from the entire interior. As part of the new functions, there is also a café with a garden
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
26 of 36
that is visually separated from the street and the rest of the yard, while the auxiliary building has
been turned into a retail space.
The yard space is resolved with green areas and paved paths that lead to the parking space and
the rear entrance to the building. The idea to achieve the best possible connection between the
interior and the yard is achieved by enabling access to the outside space by using the main entrance
to the building and courtyard entrances, which enables direct contact with the environment.
The project largely retains the facade according to the existing condition, while the courtyard
facade has been changed in accordance with the concept. The street facade is mostly kept in its
current condition. In the zone of the fence, on the left side in relation to the main entrance to the
building, there is a green wall, that is, the greenery that enriches the space and emphasizes the
entrance zone to the courtyard. In this way, the facility is in touch with nature and greenery. The
courtyard facade suggested a new purpose of the space by installing a curtain wall that can be
opened in the warmer part of the year and enable easier movement through the exhibition space.
Since the massive facade walls in most of the building were kept in their original condition, the
window openings are also there. The side facade is enriched by placing higher and wider openings
in order to let as much light as possible into the interior of the building, which gives an additional
contribution to its ambience.
The materialization of the facade was maintained in accordance with the existing condition,
which is in the lower zone of the front facade with the finishing of plaster and stone slabs.
According to the project, the ambient connection of indoor and outdoor space was designed by
introducing a water surface that suggests flow and connecting functions. Thus, better
communication in the space was achieved.
Figure 14. (a) Floor plan; (b) Materialization and axonometric of the revitalized condition of the mint
“A.D.” (authors: students Stevanović Mia, Stojković Marija and Ašković Nevena).
Group 5—The concept of the Mint revitalization project is to give a new character to the
building and transform it into a new mini center of culture and education (Figure 15). The base is
divided into two key parts by a corridor, as a central communication space. The western part is
intended for the restaurant, administration and employees, and the economic space that is connected
to the underground floor, which has the function of a warehouse. The eastern part is intended for
educational content, and it houses a museum, a library, an exhibition of the history of the site and a
flexible space for lectures. That part of the building is directly connected to the garden, through
cracks in the facade that reduce the barrier between the interior and exterior space.
Using new functions, such as a museum and a modern library, meet the need for this content in
this part of the city. The smaller, accompanying building of the Mint “A.D.”, which once served as a
space for the keeper, was also repurposed in accordance with the whole concept and given the
function of a private greenhouse. Equally, through function and form, the conversion is read by
dividing it into existing and new structure, and on the courtyard facade itself, the division in the
interior and the functions inside is read.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
27 of 36
By looking at the axonometric view, the individual interventions performed on the facility are
best noticed. Primarily separating the planes of the gable roof and placing them in a new relation, so
that they pass each other, one roof plane merges with the facade plane, which overlooks the
courtyard space, and the openings from the facade extend to the roof. On the other hand, the second
one was turned into a single roof cover, which, following the geometry of the second plane, was
divided into green parts and parts with solar panels.
The new gable roof becomes an element, one side of which connects with the mentioned facade
and forms a structural element that follows its shape and division into transparent and full, and this
connection is transferred all the way to the ground floor. The second side of the roof, with a different
slope, covers the building and the first side, thus forming a canopy for the new gallery space in the
southern part of the building. The principles of sustainable architecture are implemented in the roof
in the form of solar panels that provide a renewable energy source for the entire building, together
with a green layer that performs the function of thermal insulation, and compensates for energy
consumption due to large glass openings.
The new roof design solution enabled its higher height and higher usability of space, primarily
by introducing a gallery floor that provides additional quality to the library/reading room ambience,
but at the same time and functionally, provides additional space where lectures, group discussions
or other similar activities can be held. At the same time, the cross‐sections read the way in which two
typologically different roof elements meet and the gap that occurs in the interspace. The gap
contributes to the solution of the lack of light in the space by becoming a lantern.
Figure 15. (a) Floor; (b) Sections; (c) Axonometric depict of the revitalized condition of the mint
“A.D.” (authors: Korica Una, Ćirić Teodora and Ćesarević Sara).
Parts of the roof on which solar panels are not mounted contain a layer of greenery as another
form of energy saving. According to some researchers, by reducing the roof temperature, the
amount of heat that is transferred to the outside air decreases. This would result in areas with lower
air temperatures slowing down urban smog formation and improving human health. Reducing the
roof temperature can also extend the life of the roof itself by reducing the heat wave [103]. Further
studies show that increasing the reflectivity of the surface and increasing the vegetative cover have
approximately the same cooling effect. Green roof infrastructure can reduce average temperature
areas in a city, averaging about 1.4°C if 50 percent of flat roofs are greened. This contributes to the
fact that green roofs can improve air levels and human health [104]. Green roofs can save energy
needed to cool and heat the building they are in, and they can also reduce energy demand and thus,
greenhouse gas emissions; green roof infrastructure can reduce average temperature fluctuations in
the city. In addition to reducing the heat island effect, green roofs can improve air levels and human
health. Some authors point to the importance of green infrastructure as an integral part of the
sustainable development strategy, focusing on green infrastructure protocols and procedures in
Belgrade [105].
Students came to form this approach to sustainable architecture through lectures, studying the
literature and researching examples of good practice in the world. The presented solution shows the
shape of the roof, which gives the impression of merging two different structures and gives a new
identity to this building, making: (a) contrast to the historical integrity of the industrial landscape,
(b) harmonization of modern adaptation with the surrounding coastal landscape (Figure 16). This
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
28 of 36
increases the attractiveness of the place with respect for this historic building and the authenticity of
the coastal part, with the possibility that this approach could be a guideline for planners and
architects in all future revitalization and presentation projects in the coastal area and beyond.
The division of the facade and the roof conditions the interior space, so that it is functionally
divided into two sectors—educational and administrative with catering. Within the educational
sector, the content is also divided to follow the division on the facade, and here, we recognize the
library as the most dominant space, and then, the museum with a souvenir shop and exhibition
space.
New transparent fields have been formed by gaps on the east facade, and the original parts of
the existing wall match them. That facade underwent major intervention, due to the opening of the
space towards the yard and additional lighting of the space, which in the past, received daylight
through the window openings.
In this way, it is physically connected to the outer space, which was not the case before. The
back facade, towards the courtyard, is also glazed in the restaurant area. The existing exit has been
preserved, as well as the rest of the former back wall, which now has an archeological function and
tells us about the original building. The main street facade is completely preserved.
Figure 16. (a) Axonometric view with materialization; (b) Diagram of the characteristics of the solar
panel; (c) Detail of hidden gutter and detail of a green roof; (d) Detail 1 (authors: Korica Una, Ćirić
Teodora and Ćesarević Sara).
4. Discussion
Forgotten industrial facilities are good training grounds for the development of various cultural
and artistic contents that enrich society itself. The Mint “A.D.” is located in the central part of the city
of Belgrade, in a zone rich in industrial heritage and represents an adequate place for the
development of various activities that would, again, draw attention to this neglected example of
industrial cultural heritage. Based on the conducted analyses of the Mint “A.D.”, the students
concluded that their solutions should be formed in accordance with modern needs that present the
historical development and production process of this complex. By forming such an approach,
students pointed out the importance of presenting tangible and intangible values, which contributes
to preserving the authenticity and integrity of the complex. With their solutions, the students tried to
keep the primary cultural and educational character of the complex through reactivation of the
complex, with new artistic, educational and catering contents, and thus, make it more attractive for
visitors. By carefully choosing new activities, the students breathed new life into this important
example of Belgrade’s industrial heritage. Through their projects of protection, revitalization and
presentation of the Mint “A.D.” complex, students envisioned small or partial changes in the spatial
organization of the building, construction and design of facades, thus, following the basic principles
of protection of architectural heritage based on preserving the authenticity and integrity of a historic
site. They retained the basic spatial and organizational structure of the building, as well as
significant stylistic elements on the facades. In their projects, the students paid special attention to
emphasizing and using important elements that make this space sustainable and cost‐effective, with
the use of natural materials, which are compatible with the existing materials. Through their
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
29 of 36
projects, they also strived to preserve the elements of intangible heritage through various
workshops, artistic and educational events which would revive old crafts, customs and the like, and
bring them closer to the citizens—the future users of this space (Figure 17).
Belgrade, as the capital and cultural center of Serbia and the former Yugoslavia, was an
important industrial center during the 19th and 20th centuries. Therefore, recognizing the role and
researching the industrial heritage of Belgrade is a very important undertaking primarily in terms of
affirmation and positioning of this specific type of heritage in the context of general national culture.
With this in mind, the teaching activities carried out at the Faculty of Architecture in Belgrade,
scientific research and final projects of the presentation, conservation and revitalization of the
industrial facility Mint “A.D.” have a special significance contributing to the diversity of Belgrade’s
cultural identity. In particular, by drawing the public’s attention to the creative proposals, the given
reuse of the Mint “A.D.” and the areas around it additionally contributes to the richness of various
contents of Belgrade as one of the very current tourist centers in Europe, whose number of tourists
has been constantly increasing in recent years.
Attractive and fresh educational student projects of conservation and revitalization of the Mint
“A.D.” contribute to the initiative to eliminate the common opinion of city authorities, the public and
the local community, that abandoned and obsolete industrial facilities in the city center should be
eliminated because they are an example of ugly aesthetics that distort the beauty of the space that is
usually planned as architecture built from the scratch, i.e., without any restrictions for new
construction. Conducting research of this type at the Faculty of Architecture in Belgrade educates
young people, who in the future, will be the bearers of advanced and sustainable initiatives. Public
presentation of project solutions informs the public about the potential of reuse and conservation of
industrial spaces as an important element in preserving the city’s history, as well as in creating a
new contemporary identity that is a driver of economic, social, cultural and tourism development.
Figure 17. Comparative analysis of student proposals for protection, revitalization and presentation
of the Mint “A.D.” complex according to sustainability criteria.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
30 of 36
As we have shown in the section dedicated to the results of the work, obsolete and abandoned
industrial sites form important zones for potential progressive economic development of the city
through the encouragement of tourism, culture, recreation, catering and other creative functions.
Therefore, urban regeneration is an important mechanism that aims to improve a particular area in
the city especially guided by sustainable development practice and goals. Industrial heritage is a
part of the architectural and urban memory of the city, as it testifies to the changes that have taken
place throughout history through its material and intangible aspects.
By destroying these ruined parts of the city, a part of the history of an urban space is lost, as
well as the continuity of culture and its development in a certain area. Therefore, revitalization and
conservation are vital steps in preserving industrial heritage and its cultural, architectural‐urban,
aesthetic and historical values in order to create the integrity of the development of the new in the
preservation of the old.
As proved by the presented student research projects, the benefits of revitalization are
numerous: preservation and renewal of industrial heritage, environmental, cultural, economic and
social revitalization of certain parts of the city and their reaffirmation, increasing the attractiveness
of these areas, increasing development in terms of attracting other functions located nearby. By
implementing adequate reuse and renovation, revitalized buildings and sites of industrial cultural
heritage can become the main driver of change that can fully revive and reaffirm the urban, natural
and social environment.
What is common to all countries in transition is that urban development is proceeding at a
much faster pace than in developed countries because there is a desire to rapidly modernize society
and accelerate the process of urbanization. In that sense, various participants and interest groups are
involved in the processes of protection and revitalization of urban units. All this often results in poor
proposals, ideas and projects that are very often destructively directed towards cultural heritage, or
very often excessive and inappropriate content is introduced into the environment of historical
monuments and sites. All this takes place under ambiguous political goals that are hidden behind
justifications such as more progressive and harmonized development of the society, the city, the
industry and the economy.
Laws and regulations in the field of cultural heritage preservation in Serbia did not follow the
changes in legislation in other developed European countries and were not harmonized with other
national laws, as a result of which, cultural monuments and protection services in Serbia were
placed in an unsatisfactory position. In that sense, it is necessary to change the attitude towards
cultural heritage, and prevent negative aspects that affect the development of the city, such as: (a)
inadequate consideration of the relationship between city development projects and the principle of
cultural heritage preservation, which often leads to bad plans and harmful impact on the natural and
cultural heritage, as well as on the way of life of the local population; (b) city development projects
based on inadequate understanding of complex and often conflicting important characteristics of a
particular historical area can lead to loss of its authenticity and identity; and (c) lack of adequate and
appropriate presentation of the importance of preserving cultural heritage to all members of society,
government, citizens, local communities and visitors, can lead to misunderstanding and poor
attitudes towards the cultural and historical heritage of a particular area in a broader sense.
Based on the above, it can be concluded that these problems are in line with the views of
modern protection methodology and that laws and strategies defining the field of urbanism and
architecture offer a framework for an integrative and self‐sustainable approach to cultural heritage
protection, which is also required in modern approaches to the protection, revitalization and
presentation of urban units, historical spaces and industrial complexes. It is necessary to devise
long‐term plans for the Belgrade riverfront, along the Sava and Danube Rivers, which will
increasingly include various governmental and civil initiatives that will make the space attractive for
investment, yet preserving the cultural‐historical character, urban morphology and historical
construction fund.
During future urban planning and architectural design, radical and destructive changes must
not be allowed, such as the demolition of old residential buildings, industrial buildings and
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
31 of 36
complexes, and the construction of new buildings of dominant heights that permanently destroy
spatial views. On the contrary, realistic and coordinated changes should be planned, that will take
into account the integrity of tangible and intangible urban and architectural heritage. In that way,
dynamic, colorful and creative historical spaces with their surroundings would be realized, which
would represent a combination of the old and the new in accordance with the modern needs of
society. By establishing monitoring, the plan for the protection, revitalization and presentation of the
Belgrade banks of the Sava and Danube Rivers will be consistently implemented. Monitoring should
consist of two segments: (a) monitoring the situation as a whole and (b) monitoring the
implementation of the plan. Adequately conducted monitoring is of great importance for urban
planners and city authorities.
5. Conclusions
In accordance with the recommendations of the Charter on the Preservation of Industrial Heritage
[2] and education in the field of protection of architectural heritage, it can be concluded that teaching
at the University of Belgrade—Faculty of Architecture fully follows the general direction and scope
that exists in other European countries. Through work on the course History and Theory 1—Visual
Culture in Architectural Theory and Practice, during a one‐semester course in the school year 2019/2020,
students were able to get acquainted with modern principles of protection, revitalization and
presentation of industrial heritage in the world and to apply the acquired knowledge on a specific
example of industrial heritage in Belgrade. Through work on specific topics related to research,
valorization, protection and revitalization of architectural heritage, students were able to develop
and enrich their knowledge in solving many contemporary problems in the protection and
revitalization of historic sites and environments. Accordingly, the students’ conceptual projects
involving the Mint “A.D.” were filled with numerous new contents, with the aim of improving the
historical, cultural and technical values that this complex possesses.
From the enclosed student conceptual projects of revitalization and presentation of the Mint
“A.D.”, a contribution was made to the research of the development of industrial architecture of the
city, but also to designing the possibilities of its reactivation through new cultural‐artistic,
educational and catering contents that would preserve this important example of technical culture.
The machines and elements of technical culture, which were found on the spot, are planned to be
part of the future revitalization and presentation in student projects, which is in line with the
recommendations on preserving industrial heritage. In that way, the dynamic concept of constant
enrichment of the authenticity of the historical place was followed, through the changes and
diversions brought by the historical time, with the necessary compliance with the guidelines from
international charters and recommendations.
In Serbia, the concept of sustainability is still not adequately represented neither in architectural
design planning, nor in business. This is why such research papers primarily aim to arouse interest,
encouraging young initiatives of future generations to raise and inform the public about the
importance of issues that are of existential significance for our future. The presented educational
projects provide practical and theoretical models of a new methodology of work that includes all the
differences and contradictions of our time and tries to include a variety of elements and factors, as
well as to provide maximum results through maximum care for the environment in pursuit of
universal goals of sustainable development.
Sustainability is not only in preserving the architecture of old industrial heritage and reducing
electricity consumption, but in such a way of architectural construction that will not disturb the local
range of resilience, as well as in the fact that architectural and urban interventions should not
endanger the health of ecosystems. Therefore, the preservation of architectural heritage and new
building construction should improve the health of the urban, natural and social environment, with
investment in sustainable architecture and urban planning being the best capital of the future.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
32 of 36
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, M.N., B.D. and I.K.Ć.; Methodology, M.N., B.D. and I.K.Ć.;
Validation, M.N., B.D. and I.K.Ć.; Formal analysis, M.N., B.D. and I.K.Ć.; Investigation, M.N., B.D. and I.K.Ć.;
Resources, M.N., B.D. and I.K.Ć.; Data curation, B.D.; Writing—original draft preparation, M.N., B.D. and
I.K.Ć.; Writing—review and editing, M.N., B.D. and I.K.Ć.; Visualization, B.D.; Supervision, M.N.; Project
Administration, I.K.Ć.; Funding acquisition, M.N., B.D. and I.K.Ć. All authors have read and agreed to the
published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments: We thank the anonymous reviewers who contributed suggestions to improve the quality of
the paper, the Academic Editors, all the MDPI staff for their valuable work, Faculty of Architecture University
of Belgrade, students and colleagues for their contribution.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Tasić, N.; Zotović, Lj.; Kalić, J.; Tričković, R.; Milosavljević, P.; Milić, D.; Maksimović, B.; Kojić, B.;
Milićević, J.; Gligorijević, B.; et al. Istorija Beograda; Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti: Belgrade, Serbia,
1995.
TICCIH (The International Committee for the Conservation of the Industrial Heritage). The Nizhny Tagil
Charter for the Industrial Heritage; TICCIH: Ceredigion, UK, 2003.
Palmer, M.; Neaverson, P. Industrial Archaeology. In Principles and Practice; Routledge: London, UK; New
York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 1–2.
Council of Europe Industrial Heritage in Europe; Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly: Brussels,
Belgium,
2013.
Available
online:
http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref‐XML2HTML‐en.asp?fileid=19512&lang=EN (accessed on 14
January 2020).
ICOMOS (International Council of Monuments and Sites). Venice Charter for the Conservation and Restoration
of Monuments and Sites; ICOMOS: Venice, Italy, 1964.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). Convention Concerning the
Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage; UNESCO: Paris, France, 1972.
Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of the Architectural Heritage of Europe; Council of Europe:
Granada, Spain, 1985.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). Convention for the
Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2003.
Petranović, B. Istorija Jugoslavije 1918–1988, Knjige 1,2,3; Nolit: Belgrade, Yugoslavia, 1988.
Ignjatović, A. Jugoslovenstvo u arhitekturi 1904–1941; Građevinska knjiga: Belgrade, Serbia, 2007.
Belgrade, W. Available online: https://www.belgradewaterfront.com/en/ (accessed on 22 January 2020)
Academy of Architecture of Serbia. Available online: https://aas.org.rs/tag/beograd‐na‐vodi/ (accessed on
22 January 2020).
National Sustainable Development Strategy [Nacionalna strategija održivog razvoja]. Offcial Gazette of the
Republic of Serbia [Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije] br. 57/2008; Službeni glasnik: Belgrade, Serbia, 3 June
2008.
Museum of Science and Technology. In Protocol for the Integral Protection of Industrial Heritage; MST:
Belgrade, Serbia, 2007.
Lalović, K.; Živković, J.; Radosavlejvić, U.; Đukanović, Z. An Integral Approach to the Modeling of
Information Support for Local Sustainable Development‐Experiences of a Serbian Enabling Leadership
Experiment. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2675.
Nikezić, A.; Marković, D. Place‐Based Education in the Architectural Design Studio: Agrarian Landscape
as a Resource for Sustainable Urban Lifestyle. Sustainability 2015, 7, 9711–9733.
Radosavljević, U.; Kuletin Ćulafić, I. Use of Cultural Heritage for Place Branding in Educational Projects:
The Case of Smederevo and Golubac Fortresses on the Danube. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5234.
Bottero, М.; D’Alpaos, C.; Oppio, A. Ranking of Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Abandoned Industrial
Heritage in Vulnerable Contexts: A Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Approach. Sustainability 2019, 11,
785.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
33 of 36
Coscia, C.; Lazzari, G.; Rubino, I.; Values, Memory, and the Role of Exploratory Methods for Policy‐Design
Processes and the Sustainable Redevelopment of Waterfront Contexts: The Case of Officine Piaggio (Italy).
Sustainability 2018, 10, 2989.
ICOMOS (International Council of Monuments and Sites). The Nara Document on Authenticity; ICOMOS:
Nara, Japan, 1994.
ICOMOS (International Council of Monuments and Sites). The Nara+20: On Heritage Practices, Cultural
Values and the Concept of Authenticity; ICOMOS: Nara, Japan, 2014.
ICOMOS (International Council of Monuments and Sites). International Cultural Tourism Charter: Managing
Tourism at Places of Heritage Significance; ICOMOS: Mexico City, Mexico, 1999.
World Summit on Sustainable Tourism. The 2015 World Charter for Sustainable Tourism +20; World Summit
on Sistainable Tourism: Victoria‐Gasteiz, Spain, 2015.
TICCIH (The International Committee for the Conservation of the Industrial Heritage). Taipei Declaration
for Asian Industrial Heritage. In Proceedings of the TICCIH Congress 15th Congress in Taipei, Taipei,
Taiwan, 5–8 November 2012.
Council of Europe. Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society;
Council of Europe: Faro, Portugal, 2005.
Council of Europe. European Landscape Convention; Council of Europe: Florence, Italy, 2000.
Council of Europe. Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe. Manifesto for a New Urbanity: European
Urban Charter II; Council of Europe: Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe: Strasbourg,
France, 2008.
TICCIH (The International Committee for the Conservation of the Industrial Heritage). Available online:
https://ticcih.org (accessed on 7 February 2020).
TICCIH (The International Committee for the Conservation of the Industrial Heritage). Available online:
https://ticcih.org/ticcih‐in‐chile‐congress‐xvii (accessed on 8 February 2020).
TICCIH (The International Committee for the Conservation of the Industrial Heritage). Memorandum of
Understanding between ICOMOS and TICCIH Regarding a Framework for Collaboration on the Conservation of
Industrial heritage; TICCIH: Aberustwyth, Ceredigion, UK, 2014.
ERIH (European Route of Industrial Heritage). European Route of Industrial Heritage: Executive Summary:
Our Common European Heritage; ERICH Secretariat Deutsche Gesellschaft für Industriekultur: Duisburg,
Germany,
2001.
Available
online:
https://www.erih.net/fileadmin/Mediendatenbank/Downloads/Masterplan___Infos/ERIH_I_summary.PD
F (accessed on 12 January 2020).
ERIH (European Route of Industrial Heritage). The Declaration of Duisburg; ERICH Secretariat Deutsche
Gesellschaft für Industriekultur: Duisburg, Germany, 2001. Available online: https://www.erih.de
(accessed on 12 January 2020).
ICOMOS (International Council of Monuments and Sites). The ICOMOS Charter on Cultural Routes. In
Proceedings of the 16th General Assembly of ICOMOS, Québec, QC, Canada, 29 September–5 October 2008.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). Recommendation on the
Historic Urban Landscape; UNESCO World Heritage Centre: Paris, France, 2011.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). Recommendation Concerning
the Safeguarding and Contemporary Role of Historic Areas; UNESCO: Paris, France, 1976.
ICOMOS (International Council of Monuments and Sites). Xi’an Declaration on the Conservation of the Setting
of Heritage Structures, Sites and Areas; ICOMOS: Paris, France, 2005.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). Vienna Memorandum on
‘World Heritage and Contemporary Architecture‐Managing the Historic Urban Landscape’; UNESCO World
Heritage Centre: Paris, France, 2005.
Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe. Manifesto for a New Urbanity: European Urban Charter
II.; Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2008.
ICOMOS (International Council of Monuments and Sites). The Québec Declaration on the Preservation of the
Spirit of the Place; ICOMOS: Paris, France, 2008.
Regionalverband Ruhr. Available online: https://www.route‐industriekultur.ruhr (accessed on 15 January
2020).
United Nations. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; United Nations: New
York, NY, USA, 2015.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
34 of 36
United Nations. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development; United Nations: Rio
de Janeiro, Brazil, 1992.
United Nations. Provisional Agenda; United Nations: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1995.
ICPD. Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development; ICPD: Cairo, Egypt,
1994; extended 2010.
United Nations. Resolution adopted by General Assembly, 66/288. The future we want. Final document of
the Rio+20 Conference. In Proceedings of the Rio+20 United Nations Conference Sustainable
Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 20–22 June 2012.
United Nations. United Nations Millennium Declaration; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2000.
United Nations. Adoption of the Paris Agreement; United Nations: Paris, France, 2015.
United Nations. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; United
Nations: Kyoto, Japan, 1997.
Law on Ratification of the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on climate
change [Zakon o potvrđivanju Kjoto protokola uz okvirnu konvenciju Ujedinjenih Nacija o promeni
klime]. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia [Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije] br. 88/07; Službeni glasnik:
Belgrade, Serbia, 2007.
United Nations. Doha Amendment the Kyoto Protocol; United Nations: Doha, Qatar, 2012.
Muminović, E.; Radosavljević, U.; Beganović, D. Strategic Planning and Management Model for the
Regeneration of Historic Urban Landscapes: The Case of Historic Center of Novi Pazar in Serbia.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1323.
Radosavljević, U.; Đorđević, A.; Živković, J.; Lalović, K.; Đukanović, Z. Educational Projects for Linking
Place Branding and Urban Planning in Serbia, European Planning Studies, 2019. Available online:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09654313.2019.1701296 (accessed on 14 Januray 2020).
Landry, C. The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators; Comedia Earthscan Publishing for a Sustainable
Future: London, UK; Sterling, VA, USA, 2008; pp. 166–167.
Radosavljević, U.; Đorđević, A.; Živković, J. Business Improvement Districts as a Management Instrument
for City Center’s Regeneration in Serbia. Facta Univ. Ser. Archit. Civ. Eng. 2015, 13, 11–22.
Lalović, K.; Radosavljević, U.; Đukanović, Z. Reframing Public Interest in the Implementation of Large
Urban Projects in Serbia: The Case of Belgrade Waterfront Project. Facta Univ. Ser. Archit. Civ. Eng. 2015, 13,
35–46.
Nikolić, M.; Pašić, D.; Milenković, A. Ispitivanje mogućnosti zaštite i revitalizacije livnice Panteliću
Zemunu. Nasleđe 2018, XIX, pp. 149–161.
Roter Blagojević, M.; Nikolić, M. Predlog revitalizacije umetničke livnice Skulptura. Nasleđe 2012, XIII, pp.
221‐234.
Vujović, B. Beograd u prošlosti i sadašnjosti; Izdavačka agencija Draganić: Belgrade, Serbia, 1994.
Janićijević, J.; Vujović, B.; Jovanović, M.; Kusovac, N.; Nemanjić, M.; Pantelić, N.; Srejović, D.; Stanić, D.
Kulturna riznica Srbije; Izdavačka zadruga IDEA: Belgrade, Serbia, 1996; pp. 233–269.
Roter Blagojević, M. The Modernization and Urban Transformation of the Belgrade in the 19th and Early
20th Century. In Planing Capital Cities: Belgrade, Bucurest, Sofia; Doytchinov, G., Đukić, A., Catalina, I., Eds.;
Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz: Graz, Austria, 2015; pp. 20–42.
Kulenović, R. Industrijsko Nasleđe Beograda; Muzej nauke i tehnike: Belgrade, Serbia, 2010.
Katalog Nepokretnih Kulturnih Dobara Na Području Grada Beograda (The Cultural Properties in
Belgrade). Available online: http://beogradskonasledje.rs/kd/zavod/savski_venac/zeleznicka_stanica.html
(accessed on 6 April 2020).
Vukotić‐Lazar, M.; Roter Blagojević, M. The 1923 Belgrade Master Plan–historic town modernization. In
Planning Perspectives, 2017; pp. 1–8. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2017.1408485
(accessed on 26 April 2020).
Petrović, D. Istorija Industrije Beograda. Razvoj I Razmestaj Industrije Beograda U XIX I XX Veku; Srpsko
geografsko društvo: Belgrade, Serbia, 2006.
Mihajlov, S. Nastanak i razvoj industrijske zone na desnoj obali Dunava u Beogradu od kraja 19. do
sredine 20. veka. Nasleđe 2011, XII, pp. 91–116.
Djukić, A.; Vaništa Lazarević, E.; Vukmirović, M. Planning framework, projects, urban competitions and
visions for development of Sava Amphitheatre. Izgradnja 2014, 3‐4, 103–121.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
35 of 36
Law on Cultural Property [Закон о културним добрима]. Official Gazette of the City of Belgrade [Službeni
list
grada
Beograda];
No.
71/94,52/2011,
99/11.
Available
online:
http://www.kultura.gov.rs/docs/dokumenti/propisi‐iz‐oblasti‐kulture/zakon‐o‐kulturnim‐dobrima.pdf
(accessed on 26 April 2020).
Obad Šćitaroci, M.; Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci, B. Heritage Urbanism. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2669.
Milinković, M.; Ćorović, D.; Vuksanović‐Macura, Z. Historical Enquiry as a Critical Method in Urban
Riverscape Revisions: The Case of Belgrade’s Confluence. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1177.
Katalog Nepokretnih Kulturnih Dobara Na Području Grada Beograda (The Cultural Properties in
Belgrade). Available online: http://beogradskonasledje.rs/kd/zavod/stari_grad/beogradska_tvrdjava.html
(accessed on 6 April 2020).
Katalog Nepokretnih Kulturnih Dobara Na Području Grada Beograda (The Cultural Properties in
Belgrade). Available online: http://beogradskonasledje.rs/kd/zavod/stari_grad/kosancicev_venac.html
(accessed on 6 April 2020).
Rosenfield, K. Beton Hala Waterfront Center / Sou Fujimoto Architects, ArchDaily. 2012. Available online:
https://www.archdaily.com/286381/beton‐hala‐waterfront‐center‐sou‐fujimoto‐architects/ISSN 0719‐8884
(accessed on 3 May 2020).
Vaništa Lazarević, E. Urban Regeneration Tools (City Branding) in Belgrade after the Democratic Change
in 2000–Social Frame. In Planing Capital Cities: Belgrade, Bucurest, Sofia; Doytchinov, G., Đukić, A., Catalina,
I., Eds.; Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz: Graz, Austria, 2015; pp. 174–187.
Roter Blagojević, M.; Nikolić, M. Dilemmas and Problems in Active Reuse of Belgrade Industrial
Architecture–The Case Study of the Sava River Area. In e‐Monographic Publication of ICOMOS Slovenia:
Protection and Reuse of Industrial Heritage: Dilemmas, Problems, Examples; Ifko, S., Stokin, M., Eds.; ICOMOS
Slovenia: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2017; pp. 25–35.
Katalog Nepokretnih Kulturnih Dobara Na Području Grada Beograda (The Cultural Properties in
Belgrade).
Available
online:
http://beogradskonasledje.rs/kd/zavod/savski_venac/zgrada_drzavne_stamparije.html (accessed on 19
April 2020).
Katalog Nepokretnih Kulturnih Dobara Na Području Grada Beograda (The Cultural Properties in
Belgrade).
Available
online:
http://beogradskonasledje.rs/kd/zavod/savski_venac/fabrika_hartije_milana_vape.html (accessed on 19
April 2020).
Katalog Nepokretnih Kulturnih Dobara Na Području Grada Beograda (The Cultural Properties in
Belgrade).
Available
online:
http://beogradskonasledje.rs/kd/zavod/savski_venac/hala_1_beogradskog_sajma.html (accessed on 19
April 2020).
Katalog Nepokretnih Kulturnih Dobara Na Području Grada Beograda (The Cultural Properties in
Belgrade).
Available
online:
http://beogradskonasledje.rs/kd/zavod/cukarica/fabrika_secera.html
(accessed on 19 April 2020).
Djukić, A.; Špirić, A.; Vujičić, T. Urban Design Competition and Megaprojects in a Context of Identity of
Cultural Heritage: Case Study Belgrade’s Riverfronts. In e‐Monographic Publication of ICOMOS Slovenia:
Protection and Reuse of Industrial Heritage: Dilemmas, Problems, Examples; Ifko, S., Stokin, M., Eds.; ICOMOS
Slovenia: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2017; pp. 59–71.
Katalog Nepokretnih Kulturnih Dobara Na Području Grada Beograda (The Cultural Properties in
Belgrade).
Available
online:
http://beogradskonasledje.rs/kd/zavod/stari_grad/termoelektrana_snaga_i_svetlost.html (accessed on 19
April 2020).
Drobnjak, B.; Nikolić, M. Bauhaus i njegova refleksija na formiranje umetničkih praksi na
eks‐jugoslovenskim kulturnim prostorima (Bauhaus and its Reflection on Forming of the Artistic Practices
in the Ex‐Yugoslav Cultural Region). Arhit. I Urban. 2019, 49, 7–17.
“BBC Dream Builders”‐Interview with Norman Foster. Interview conducted by Razia Iqbal (BBC World
Service,
16.06.2013,
London,
United
Kingdom);
Available
online:
https://www.fosterandpartners.com/media/1028028/NF‐BBC‐Dream_Builders_transcript.pdf (accessed on
15 January 2020).
Sustainability 2020, 12, 5264
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
36 of 36
Foster and Partners, 2020. Available online: https://www.fosterandpartners.com/expertise/sustainability/
(acessed on 4 January 2020).
General Urban Plan for Belgrade [Generalni urbanistički plan Beograda]. Official Gazette of the City of
Belgrade [Službeni list grada Beograda]; Službeni glasnik: Belgrade, Serbia, 2016.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). The UNESCO
Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape; UNESCO World Heritage Centre: Paris, France, 2019.
Available online: https://whc.unesco.org/en/hul/ (accessed on 22 January 2020).
Latham, D. Creative Re‐Use of Buildings; Donhead Publishing: Shaftesbury, UK, 2000; Volume 2.
Yung, E.H.K.; Chan, E.H.W. Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings:
Towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon cities. Habitat Int. 2012, 36, 352–361.
Nocca, F. The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as
Decision‐Making Tool. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1882.
World Health Organization. The WHO special initiative for mental health (2019–2023): Universal health
coverage for mental health;
World Health Organization, 2019. Available online:
https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/310981 (accessed on 26 January 2020).
United Nations. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and
Development—Brundtland Report; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 1987. Available online:
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our‐common‐future.pdf (accessed on 19
January 2020).
Evans, J.; Jones, P. Rethinking Sustainable Urban Regeneration: Ambiguity, Creativity, and the Shared
Territory. Environ. Plan. A 2008, 40, 1416–1434.
De Berardinis, P.; Rotilio, M.; Capannolo, L. Energy and Sustainable Strategies in the Renovation of
Existing Buildings: An Italian Case Study. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1472.
Günçe, K.; Mısırlısoy, D. Assessment of Adaptive Reuse Practices through User Experiences: Traditional
Houses in the Walled City of Nicosia. Sustainability 2019, 11, 540.
Radosavljević, U.; Đorđević, A.; Lalović, K.; Živković, J.; Đukanović, Z. Nodes and Networks: The
Generative Role of Cultural Heritage for Urban Revival in Kikinda. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2509.
Yoon, J.; Lee, J. Adaptive Reuse of Apartments as Heritage Assets in the Seoul Station Urban Regeneration
Area. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3124.
De Medici, S.; De Toro, P.; Nocca, F. Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development: Impact Assessment
of Two Adaptive Reuse Projects in Siracusa, Sicily. Sustainability 2020, 12, 311.
Howkins, J. The Creative Economy How People Make Money from Ideas; The Penguin Press: London, UK, 2001;
pp. 86–87.
Harries, K. The Ethical Function of Architecture; MIT Press: Massachusetts, NE, USA, 2000; p. 270.
Delancey, C. Architecture can Save the World: Building and Environmental Etics. In the Philosophical
Forum; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK and Malden, USA, 2004; Volume 35, pp.147‐159.
Gradska Opština Savski Venac (Municipality Savski Venac). 2016. Available online:
https://www.savskivenac.rs/cir/o‐opstini/ (accessed on 18 April 2020).
Bogunović, S. Arhitektonska Enciklopedija Beograda XIX I XX Veka (I); Beogradska knjiga: Belgrade, Serbia,
2005; pp. 355–356.
Pavlović, M. Nikola Nestorović; Orion art: Belgrade, Serbia, 2017; p. 46.
Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Inclusion of Solar Reflectance and Thermal Emittance Prescriptive
Requirements for Residential Roofs in Title 24; Pacific Gas and Electric Company: Sacramento, CA, USA, 2006,
p. 3.
Solecki, W.D.; Rosenzweig, C.; Cox, J.; Parshall, L.; Rosenthal, J.; Hodges, S. Potential Impact of Green
Roofs on the Urban Heat Island Effect. In Green Roofs in the New York Metropolitan Region; Rosenzweig, C.,
Gaffin, S., Parshall, L., Eds.; Columbia University Center for Climate Systems Research and NASA
Goddard Institute for Space Studies: New York, NY, USA, 2006; p. 21.
Simić, I.; Stupar, A.; Djokić, V. Building the Green Infrastructure of Belgrade: The Importance of
Community Greening. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1183.
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).