Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2014, Federal Governance
The paper is divided in three sections. In the first section, I question the use of the statist redistributive paradigm in federalism. In the second section, I argue that efficiency is a moral principle and that it has a strong normative appeal, especially in contexts of diversity. I show that adopting efficiency as a guiding principle to think of the role of the state, especially in contexts of pluralism, as in MNF, allows us to consider the division of competences in a way that is yet unexplored in political philosophy. Furthermore, I argue that embracing efficiency allows us to avoid the moral problems that other moral approaches encounter, especially as I will defend a non-utilitarian conception of efficiency. That also allows me to show that if one opts for the view that pictures federalism as an efficiency maximizing enterprise, it does not lead to a libertarian conception of federalism. Finally, I try to briefly sketch a possible connection between the principle of efficiency...
Economic Record, 1991
HELIOPOLIS, 2022
The purpose of this paper is to provide a definition of federalism by looking at some of those ethical qualities and philosophical principles that shape its essence. Since it rejects both synthetic and centrifugal dynamics, and wants to keep both alive and active, federalism reveals a dialectical and antinomic essence. Since its aim is to concretely maintain the coexistence in tension of the two opposing demands of unity and diversity, federalism is much more an ethics and a practice than an abstract political theory or an ideology. Thus, the best approach to understand it, is to look at its most successful realizations: the United States of America, which represent the first federal democracy in history, and Switzerland, the repository of the oldest federalist culture in the world. The paper explores the cultural and historical roots, the moral requirements, and the spirit that underlie American and Swiss federalism. Neither of them is the result of an organic and systematic doctrinal elaboration. In contrast, both were gradually built in a pragmatic and empirical manner, in response to the challenges and stresses posed by the geographical, economic, socio-political and cultural context. The Swiss and American experiences reveal then that the essence of federalism is not only anti-utopian but also anti-systematic and paradoxical, as it does not intend to build an ideal and rational political model, but, on the contrary, to find a concrete solution to the problem of coexistence of unity and diversity by avoiding any synthesis.
Crawford Journal of Politics (CRUJOP), 2020
Federalism remains the idea of two or more independent nations forming a union for political, economic, socio-cultural and security reasons. Beginning from the 17 th to the 19 th century, European philosophers: Johannes Althusius, Immanuel Kant, Baron de Montesquieu, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Alexis de Tocqueville and, John Stuart Mill laid the philosophical foundation of federalism in their respective magnum opus. In the 20 th century, K. C. Wheare, W. S. Livingston, W. H. Riker, C. J. Friedrich and, W. E. Oates propounded the legal-institutional theory, sociological theory, bargaining theory, process theory and the theory of fiscal federalism for the purpose of explaining the idea 'federalism'. This paper examines the philosophy and theories of federalism from the 17 th to the 20 th century. For this study, the qualitative method of secondary data collection was adopted. The paper conclude that the philosophy and theories of federalism are tools that assist analysts and readers with the normative and empirical perspectives of federalism, the conditions and preconditions for adopting federalism, the division of power in a federation and the economic functions of the levels of government in a federal state among other things.
Acta Politica, 2008
The portion of the issue with considering federalism is that it could be a microcosm of the issue with examining political science itself. Federalism bargains at the same time with crucial ethical questions as well as with flippant matter-of-fact issues. The previous, like social differences and person and collective characters, are profoundly charged enthusiastic questions for numerous individuals whereas the last mentioned include the routine pursuit of financial benefit and security and reflect for the foremost portion calculated and impartial self-interest.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Academia Letters, 2021
Bijdragen en Mededelingen betreffende de Geschiedenis der Nederlanden, 2001
The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 2024
Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan
Perancangan jalur Trans Jogja menggunakan penyelesaian GRAF, 2019
Expansion Hidden in Plain Sight: How the Hubble Parameter, Kappa Function, and Friedmann Equations Unveil the Growth of Matter and the Expansion of the Universe., 2024
Scientific Reports
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 2003
2015
Physical Review B, 2008
Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 2008
European Journal of Immunology, 2001
Abant Medical Journal, 2013